Search

Aim: Data on ablation for atypical recurrent atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and long-term follow-up are generally sparse. Furthermore, the rate of recurrence and safety of cryoablation for atypical AVNRT has not been established. We compared patients cryoablated for atypical AVNRT and typical AVNRT during long-term follow-up., Methods: All patients (n = 2612) who underwent catheter ablation for AVNRT at the Karolinska University Hospital between January 2009 and August 2019 were analyzed. A total of 91 patients undergoing first-time cryoablation for atypical AVNRT were included. A control group with first-time cryoablation for typical AVNRT was matched in a 1:1 ratio. Patients were followed-up for recurrences for a median of 5.0 years (interquartile range: 3.1-7.5 years)., Results: After 5 years, AVNRT recurrence occurred in 10 patients (11.0%) in the atypical AVNRT group and in 8 patients (8.8%) in the typical AVNRT group (hazard ratio: 1.31 [95% confidence interval: 0.52-3.32]; p = 0.568). The duration of the index procedure was significantly longer for atypical compared to typical AVNRT ablation (132.1 ± 49.2 min vs. 110.1 ± 38.8 min; p = 0.001). Transient AV blocks occurred in a similar fashion in the atypical compared to typical group (11 [12.1%] vs. 4 [4.9%]; p = 0.103). However, no ablation induced persistent AV block developed in either group., Conclusion: Cryoablation for atypical AVNRT showed similar rate of recurrences and safety compared to typical AVNRT during long-term follow-up., (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation represents a standard of care for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). In this setting, cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as alternative therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF remain a matter of debate., Methods and Results: We searched electronic scientific databases for studies of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF. Aggregate data were pooled to perform a meta-analysis. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia and procedure-related complications, respectively. A total of 6473 participants from 10 studies (CB, n = 2232 vs. RF, n = 4241) were studied. After a median follow-up of 16 months, the risk of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio, RR 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.01 [0.90-1.14], P = 0.83) and procedure-related complications (RR [95% CI] = 0.92 [0.66-1.28], P = 0.61) were comparable between CB vs. RF ablation. Cryoballoon ablation led to a higher risk of persistent phrenic nerve palsy (RR [95% CI] = 13.60 [3.87-47.81], P < 0.01) and a lower risk of cardiac tamponade (RR [95% CI] = 0.48 [0.25-0.89], P = 0.02) compared with RF ablation. There was a trend of statistically significant interaction between the type of CB and the duration of ablation (P for interaction = 0.09)., Conclusion: In patients with paroxysmal AF, ablation therapy with CB is associated with efficacy and safety comparable to that of RF. Second-generation CB catheters seem to reduce procedure duration. Further studies are warranted to disclose the impact of second-generation CB catheters compared with RF for ablation of paroxysmal AF., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: This study evaluates the incidence of procedural complications related to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) to assess the potential feasibility and safety of same‐day discharge in a large cohort. Methods: We performed an analysis of prospectively collected data of complications of all patients staying overnight after undergoing AF ablation between 2001 and 2020 at a tertiary center. Using medical records, we analyzed complications occurring intraprocedurally until 6 h postablation and between 6 h postablation and discharge the day after the ablation procedure. Results: In 5414 AF ablations, we identified a total of 108 (2.0%) major complications occurring intraprocedural or before discharge. Most major complications occurred intraprocedurally or within 6 h after the procedure (n = 96, 1.8%). Twelve (0.2%) major complications occurred between 6 h Postablation and discharge. The most common of these major complications were congestive heart failure (n = 6) and transient ischemic attack (TIA, n = 4). During this time span, 61 (1.1%) minor complications occurred. Factors independently associated with major complications intraprocedurally and until discharge were body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 (p =.009), significant valvular disease (p =.001), cardiomyopathy (p <.001), prior stroke or TIA (p =.014), first‐time procedure versus repeat procedure (p =.013), cryoablation versus radiofrequency (p <.001), and procedure duration (p <.001). Conclusion: After AF ablation, very few complications occurred between 6 h postprocedure and discharge the next day. Therefore, same‐day discharge is a safe option for a majority of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Radiofrequency (RF) ablation represents a standard of care for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). In this setting, cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as alternative therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF remain a matter of debate.Methods and Results: We searched electronic scientific databases for studies of CB vs. RF ablation in patients with paroxysmal AF. Aggregate data were pooled to perform a meta-analysis. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia and procedure-related complications, respectively. A total of 6473 participants from 10 studies (CB, n = 2232 vs. RF, n = 4241) were studied. After a median follow-up of 16 months, the risk of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio, RR 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.01 [0.90-1.14], P = 0.83) and procedure-related complications (RR [95% CI] = 0.92 [0.66-1.28], P = 0.61) were comparable between CB vs. RF ablation. Cryoballoon ablation led to a higher risk of persistent phrenic nerve palsy (RR [95% CI] = 13.60 [3.87-47.81], P < 0.01) and a lower risk of cardiac tamponade (RR [95% CI] = 0.48 [0.25-0.89], P = 0.02) compared with RF ablation. There was a trend of statistically significant interaction between the type of CB and the duration of ablation (P for interaction = 0.09).Conclusion: In patients with paroxysmal AF, ablation therapy with CB is associated with efficacy and safety comparable to that of RF. Second-generation CB catheters seem to reduce procedure duration. Further studies are warranted to disclose the impact of second-generation CB catheters compared with RF for ablation of paroxysmal AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]