Search

Cataract is among the leading causes of visual impairment worldwide. Innovations in treatment have drastically improved patient outcomes, but to be properly implemented, it is necessary to have the right diagnostic tools. This review explores the cataract grading systems developed by researchers in recent decades and provides insight into both merits and limitations. To this day, the gold standard for cataract classification is the Lens Opacity Classification System III. Different cataract features are graded according to standard photographs during slit lamp examination. Although widely used in research, its clinical application is rare, and it is limited by its subjective nature. Meanwhile, recent advancements in imaging technology, notably Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography, have opened the possibility of objective assessment of lens structure. With the use of automatic lens anatomy detection software, researchers demonstrated a good correlation to functional and surgical metrics such as visual acuity, phacoemulsification energy, and surgical time. The development of deep learning networks has further increased the capability of these grading systems by improving interpretability and increasing robustness when applied to norm-deviating cases. These classification systems, which can be used for both screening and preoperative diagnostics, are of value for targeted prospective studies, but still require implementation and validation in everyday clinical practice., Competing Interests: TY reports personal fees from Alcon and non-financial support from Johnson & Johnson that are unrelated to the submitted work. GA reports grants, personal fees, non-financial support, and consulting fees from Johnson & Johnson and Alcon, grants, personal fees, non-financial support from Carl Zeiss Meditec, Hoya, Kowa, Oculentis/Teleon, Rayner, Santen, Sifi, Ursapharm, grants and personal support from Biotech, Oculus, EyeYon, grants from Acufocus, Anew, Contamac, Glaucoma, Physiol, and Rheacell, all of which are unrelated to the submitted work. RK reports grants, personal support, non-financial support from Alimera, Alcon, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, Hoya, Novartis, Physiol, Rayner, and Roche, grants from Chengdu Kanghong, personal grants and non-financial support from Allergan, Carl Zeiss, Kowa, Heidelberg Engineering, Oculentis/Teleon, Oculus, Santen, Sifi, and Acufocus that are not related to the submitted work. LM, GL and IB report that they have no conflicts of interest. This study received no financial support whatsoever., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To show clinical outcomes after bilateral implantation of either a hydrophobic FineVision POD F GF or a hydro-philic FineVision POD F intraocular lens (IOL) (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc)., Methods: A total of 110 patients with cataract were randomized to receive either POD F GF or POD F IOLs and followed up for 2 years. The measurements included refraction, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected distance (UDVA and CDVA), intermediate (UIVA and DCIVA), and near (UNVA and DCNVA) visual acuities, defocus curve, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, photic phenomena, and patient-reported outcomes., Results: The mean spherical equivalent was similar in both groups and stable across visits (< 0.25 diopters [D]). At 2 years, 81.8% and 90.5% of eyes were within ±0.50 D in the POD F GF and POD F IOL groups, respectively (100% for ±1.00 D in both groups). At 2 years, 100% and 90.5% of the patients presented a binocular CDVA of 20/25 or better; 93.9% and 85.7% of patients a DCIVA of 20/25 or better and 87.5% and 70% of patients a DCNVA of 20/25 or better, for the POD F GF and POD F IOL groups, respectively. The defocus curve showed continuous visual acuity, being 20/32 or better in both groups over a 4.50 D range. Both groups presented good contrast sensitivity for photopic and mesopic conditions, and the size and intensity of halo and glare phenomena were similar between the two. Both groups also included a high percentage of patients who reported that they had stopped wearing glasses and greater than 80% satisfaction and recommendation levels., Conclusions: This study showed comparable long-term visual and refractive outcomes of both IOL models after cataract surgery. [ J Refract Surg . 2023;39(12):798-807.] .

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in patients who underwent intrastromal femtosecond laser treatment of presbyopia (INTRACOR)., Methods: This was an interventional case series of 8 patients (10 eyes) who presented for cataract surgery 6.1 ± 3.2 years (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) after INTRACOR (Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH) treatment. A monofocal IOL was implanted in 9 eyes (7 patients) and a small-aperture IOL was implanted in 1 eye. The IOL power was calculated without adjustments using biometry obtained after the INTRACOR treatment. For additional calculations, keratometry obtained before the INTRACOR treatment was used. Postoperative examinations included visual acuity testing, manifest refraction, defocus curve, ocular biometry, corneal tomography, aberrometry, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and slit-lamp examination., Results: After the cataract surgery, the mean ± SD uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.37 ± 0.17 logMAR, the corrected distance visual acuity was 0.10 ± 0.10 logMAR, and the manifest refraction spherical equivalent, adjusted to infinity, was +0.39 ± 0.63 diopters (D). Intermediate and near visual acuity, both uncorrected and distance-corrected, and distance-corrected defocus curves varied considerably among patients. Using biometry performed after INTRACOR, the traditional IOL power calculation formulas produced hyperopic outcomes, with the mean ± SD prediction error ranging from +0.72 ± 0.34 to +0.96 ± 0.41 D. Although the mean ± SD prediction error decreased (range: -0.34 ± 0.56 to -0.15 ± 0.53 D) when using keratometry obtained before INTRACOR, the accuracy remained low due to high variability., Conclusions: In patients with cataract who had previous INTRACOR treatment, IOL power calculation could be inaccurate, with a tendency toward hyperopic outcomes. These results require confirmation in more extensive studies. [ J Refract Surg . 2023;39(10):676-682.] .

In this meta-analysis and systematic literature review of refractive outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), the extent of the refractive shift and an overview of reasons for refractive shift after DMEK are provided. The PubMed library was screened for articles containing the terms "Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty," "DMEK," "Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with cataract surgery," "triple-DMEK" combined with "refractive outcomes," "refractive shift," and "hyperopic shift." The refractive outcomes after DMEK were analyzed and compared using a fixed and random effects model. The overall mean change of the spherical equivalent outcome when compared with the preoperative value in cases of DMEK or when compared with the preoperative target refraction in cases of DMEK combined with cataract surgery was +0.43 diopters (D) (95% CI, 0.31-0.55). When DMEK is combined with cataract surgery, a target refraction of -0.5 D is recommended to achieve emmetropia. Changes in the posterior corneal curvature are identified as the main cause of the refractive hyperopic shift., (Copyright © 2023 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Purpose: To study the distribution of spherical aberration (SA) in astigmatic corneas in a cataract population and the relationship between magnitude of corneal astigmatism and fourth-order corneal SA., Methods: Data routinely collected using a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with a minimum age of 60 years were included. Total corneal SA (from anterior and posterior corneal surface) was obtained for a 6-mm cor-neal area aligned with the pupil center. Exclusion criteria were insufficient measurement quality, total deviation index (Belin/Ambrósio Deviation) greater than 1.60, and corneal thickness at the thinnest point of less than 490 μm. One eye per patient was chosen randomly. Eyes were divided into low (≤ 1.00 diopters [D]), moderate (> 1.00 to ≤ 2.00 D), and high (> 2.00 D) astigmatism groups according to the Scheimpflug measurements., Results: A total of 528 eyes were included in this analysis. Low astigmatism was found in 129 patients, moderate astigmatism in 265 patients, and high astigmatism in 134 patients. Mean astigmatism was 0.68 ± 0.24, 1.45 ± 0.28, and 2.91 ± 0.95 D in the low, moderate, and high astigmatism groups, respectively. Mean corneal SA in patients with moderate and high astigmatism was higher than in the low astigmatism group. The difference reached the significance level for the comparison of low and high astigmatism groups ( P = .023). The fourth-order SA increased gradually with the magnitude of astigmatism with a slope of 0.015., Conclusions: SA was significantly larger in the cataract population with high corneal astigmatism. The increase of positive sign SA with the magnitude of astigmatism suggests that patients with moderate to high astigmatism may benefit more from intraocular lenses with negative sign SA correction. [ J Refract Surg . 2023;39(8):532-538.] .

Background: Due to its invasive nature, cataract surgery can lead to inflammatory processes in the posterior segment, which can result in prolonged recovery times, reduced functional outcomes, and late-onset complications. The aim of the current study was to identify wherever phacoemulsification parameters play a role in choroidal thickness change following cataract surgery., Methods: This prospective single-center study enrolled 31 patients (31 eyes) scheduled to undergo routine cataract surgery. Patients with previous ocular surgeries, pathologies or general disorders affecting vision were excluded. Patients were examined preoperatively, as well as 1, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) as well as cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), ultrasound time (UT), and fluids used during surgery were recorded. Subfoveal choroidal thickness was measured manually by two masked independent experts using enhanced depth imaging (EDI) optical coherence tomography (OCT). Furthermore, cataract density was automatically calculated using a custom MATLAB script and an anterior segment OCT., Results: Subfoveal choroidal thickness increased significantly (p < 0.001, Student's paired sample t-test) and continuously during the 12-week-long follow-up period. Both the nuclear lens density and the improvement in CDVA correlated significantly with this increase (r = 0.413, p = 0.021 and r = 0.421, p = 0.018, respectively). Neither the CDE (r = 0.334, p = 0.071), the UT (r = 0.102, p = 0.629), the amount of fluid used (r = 0.237, p = 0.27) nor the decrease in IOP (r = - 0.197, p = 0.288) showed any significant correlation with the choroidal swelling., Conclusion: Cataract surgery leads to an increase in subfoveal choroidal thickness. While no statistically significant correlation to the phacoemulsification parameters could be established, this might be because of a selection bias due to the technological constraints of the OCT. Nevertheless, the choroid might play a central role in early- and late-onset complications., Competing Interests: L. Mackenbrock, J. Weindler, G. Labuz and I. Baur have nothing to disclose. G. Auffarth and R. Khoramnia disclose honoraria for lecture from Heidelberg Engineering and Zeiss., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Das IVCRC wird von den Firmen Alcon, Johnson & Johnson, Santen, Teleon und Carl Zeiss unterstützt.

Smaller corneal incisions in cataract surgery are linked with a better visual outcome and less frequent postoperative endophthalmitis. The insertion of intraocular lens (IOL) injector systems into the anterior chamber of the eye to implant an IOL is associated with incision enlargement (IE) impeding these positive effects. The aim of this study was to compare manufacturers' recommended incision sizes (IS) of 13 different intraocular lens injector systems in regard of intraoperative IE and postoperative IS. In total, 499 corneal incisions in ex vivo porcine eyes were analyzed. The preoperative ISs depended on the recommended IS of the examined injector system. The IS was measured right before and after IOL injector insertion with an incision gauge set. There was intraoperative IE in 87% of the incisions with a mean IE of 0.26 ± 0.18 mm. IE was often significantly larger in small IS compared to larger IS concerning an injector system (P < 0.05). Five injector systems needed to have a significantly larger IS than the manufacturers' recommended IS with an average difference of 0.3 mm when applying study criteria (P < 0.05). Thus, the present study shows that IS recommendations require to be critically analyzed by ophthalmic surgeons to enable evidence-based practice., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: This study evaluated the 5-year effectiveness and safety of iStent inject ® trabecular micro-bypass with or without cataract surgery (Combined or Standalone, respectively) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG)., Methods: This prospective longitudinal case series included consecutive iStent inject cases from a single surgeon at a large German academic hospital. Intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, safety, and indicators of disease stability through 5 years were assessed in the Overall cohort and in subgroup analyses stratified by usage (Combined or Standalone)., Results: Preoperative mean IOP in the Overall cohort (n = 125) was 23.5 ± 6.2 mmHg on 2.68 ± 1.02 mean medications, reducing to 14.1 ± 1.8 mmHg on 0.77 ± 0.82 medications at 5 years (40% and 71% reductions, respectively; both p < 0.001). All but 1 eye (> 99%) were on medication(s) preoperatively, but 46% were medication-free at 5 years (p < 0.001). In Combined eyes (n = 81), mean IOP decreased by 39% (22.6 mmHg to 13.8 mmHg, p < 0.001) and medications by 69% (2.52 to 0.78, p < 0.001). In Standalone eyes, mean IOP reduced by 42% (25.3 mmHg to 14.6 mmHg, p < 0.001) and medications by 75% (2.98 to 0.74, p < 0.001). At final follow-up, 83% of eyes had achieved ≥ 20% IOP reduction, and all but 1 eye (> 99%) had the same or lower IOP versus preoperative; all eyes (100%) maintained or reduced their medication burden versus preoperative. Favorable safety included 0 intraoperative complications and 0 filtration surgeries through 5 years. Long-term indicators of disease stability (visual fields, retinal nerve-fiber layer thickness, and cup:disc ratio) were unchanged over the course of 5-year follow-up., Conclusions: iStent inject produced significant and durable 5-year reductions in IOP (nearly 10-mmHg reduction) and medications (nearly 2-medication reduction), with stable disease parameters over time. Combined and Standalone subgroups had similar outcomes., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Relative anterior microphthalmos, nanophthalmos and high-grade hyperopia are small eyes with different characteristic morphological relationships between the anterior segment and axis length. This article discusses the intraoperative challenges and surgical approaches to solutions for cataract operations in patients with one of the three named morphological alterations. Additionally, the article addresses possible comorbidities including glaucoma and preoperative planning., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 2 enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). The TECNIS Eyhance IOL (Model ICB00) was compared with a standard monofocal IOL (TECNIS Monofocal, Model ZCB00)., Setting: European multicenter study., Design: Prospective, bilateral, randomized, comparative/evaluator-masked, controlled study., Methods: Adult subjects scheduled to undergo bilateral, primary phacoemulsification cataract extraction and posterior IOL implantation were randomized to receive the enhanced monofocal ICB00 IOL or the monofocal ZCB00 IOL in both eyes. Monocular endpoints at 6 months included distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), photopic corrected distance visual acuity, and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA). Binocular visual acuities, monocular corrected distance contrast sensitivity (first eyes), patient-reported outcomes, and safety were assessed at 6 months., Results: Overall, 139 patients were bilaterally implanted with the enhanced monofocal IOL (n = 67) or standard monofocal IOL (n = 72) and available for the 6-month visit. The enhanced monofocal IOL significantly improved mean monocular and binocular DCIVA and UIVA by at least 1-line logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution vs the standard monofocal IOL (all P ≤ .0001). Distance vision for the enhanced monofocal IOL was 20/20 or better and comparable with that of the standard monofocal lens at 6 months. Contrast sensitivity, photic phenomena outcomes, and rates of adverse events were similar between the 2 groups., Conclusions: In patients undergoing cataract surgery, TECNIS Eyhance IOL Model ICB00 provided enhanced intermediate vision and similar distance performance and photic phenomena compared with a standard monofocal IOL, along with improved functional performance in daily life., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Purpose: To determine safety and visual outcomes in eyes with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) implanted with a novel intraocular lens (IOL) that delivers an optimized retinal image to all macular areas within 10 degrees of retinal eccentricity., Methods: This was a consecutive case series of 244 eyes with dry/stable wet AMD and logMAR visual acuity ≥0.3 implanted with iolAMD Eyemax mono TM (London Eye Hospital Pharma), a single-piece, injectable, hydrophobic acrylic IOL sited in the capsular bag. Primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes were changes in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) (logMAR)., Results: Mean age at surgery was 80 years. Mean duration of follow-up was 3 months (range 1-16 months). No eyes had worsening of CDVA. Frequency of perioperative complications was equivalent to standard IOL implantation. Postoperative refractive outcomes were within ±1 D of the target refraction in 88% of cases. Mean preoperative CDVA improved from 1.06 to 0.71 postoperatively (mean of differences -0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.3886 to -0.3223; p<0.0001), equating to an approximate Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study gain of 18 letters. Mean preoperative CNVA (N-point; logMAR conversion) improved from 1.36 to 0.88 postoperatively (mean of differences -0.48; 95% CI -0.53 to -0.44; p<0.0001)., Conclusions: This novel IOL appears safe in the short to medium term. Improvements in postoperative CDVA and CNVA exceed those observed with standard implants.

Background: Clinical evaluation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) regarding visual performance at various distances, reading performance on an electronic reading desk, and depth of focus on the defocus curve., Methods: In this prospective study, 30 eyes of 15 patients who received the Tecnis Symfony IOL (Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Santa Ana, CA) were examined 3.60 ± 1.54 months postoperatively. Uncorrected and corrected distance (UDVA and CDVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate (UIVA and DCIVA), and uncorrected and distance-corrected near (UNVA and DCNVA) visual acuity were determined. The defocus curve was performed with distance correction. Furthermore, the reading acuity at the preferred near and intermediate distances was measured with consideration of the reading distance, speed, and print size. A subjective questionnaire was also administered., Results: Results showed a median UDVA of 0.03 logMAR or 20/21.43 Snellen (range: 0.44 to -0.18 logMAR or 20/55.08 to 20/13.21 Snellen), UNVA of 0.20 logMAR or 20/31.70 Snellen (range: 0.46 to 0.00 logMAR or 20/57.68 to 20/20 Snellen), and UIVA of -0.03 logMAR or 20/18.67 Snellen (range: 0.14 to -0.18 logMAR or 20/27.61 to 20/13.21 Snellen). The improved performance at intermediate distance was confirmed by an uncorrected reading acuity of 0.09 logMAR or 20/24.61 Snellen (range: 0.36 to 0.00 logMAR or 20/45.82 to 20/20.00 Snellen) at a preferred intermediate distance of 64.10 cm (range: 52.0 to 75.0 cm). The defocus curve showed an extended range of visual acuity of 0.10 logMAR or better between 1.00 and -1.50 diopters., Conclusions: The EDOF IOL design provided a wide range of improved visual and reading function between far and intermediate distances and also improved near visual acuity. Patients reported a high rate of satisfaction and spectacle independence at the various distances. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(10):664-669.]., (Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.)

Background: Laboratory analysis and optical quality assessment of explanted hydrophilic intraocular lenses (IOLs) with clinically significant opacification after posterior lamellar keratoplasty (DMEK and DSAEK)., Methods: Thirteen opacified IOLs after posterior lamellar keratoplasty, 8 after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), 3 after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and 2 after both DSAEK and DMEK were analysed in our laboratory. Analyses included optical bench assessment for optical quality, light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (EDS)., Results: In all IOLs the opacification was caused by a thin layer of calciumphosphate that had accumulated underneath the anterior optical surface of the IOLs in the area spared by the pupil/anterior capsulorhexis. The calcifications lead to a significant deterioration of the modulation transfer function across all spatial frequencies of the affected IOLs., Conclusions: The instillation of exogenous material such as air or gas into the anterior chamber increases the risk for opacification of hydrophilic IOLs irrespective of the manufacturer or the exact composition of the hydrophilic lens material. It is recommended to avoid the use of hydrophilic acrylic IOLs in patients with endothelial dystrophy that will likely require procedures involving the intracameral instillation of air or gas, such as DMEK or DS(A)EK.

We present the case of a 56-year-old woman with moderate myopia and bilateral cataract who had cataract extraction and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Due to the patient's desire for spectacle independence, a trifocal IOL with toric correction for astigmatism was implanted. During the follow-up, it became obvious that the implanted IOL had rotated and tilted due to insufficient fixation in the large capsular bag of the myopic eye. An IOL explantation was therefore performed, and the original IOL was exchanged for a bifocal toric IOL with a larger overall diameter. Stable fixation of the IOL in the capsular bag was achieved, and after surgery in the second eye, the patient recovered good bilateral vision. This case illustrates the need for careful selection of IOL diameter and sizing even in patients with moderate myopia due to the potentially larger ocular dimensions in these patients., (Copyright © 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the visual, refractive, and aberrometric outcomes of a bitoric intraocular lens (IOL) and its stability and alignment within the capsular bag., Methods: A retrospective study including 41 eyes of 24 patients with preexisting corneal astigmatism of 0.75 diopters or greater undergoing cataract surgery with implantation of the bitoric IOL AT TORBI 709M (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up period. The misalignment between intended and real axis and the levels of corneal, internal, and ocular aberrations (KR-1W; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) were also evaluated., Results: A total of 76% and 97% of eyes had a postoperative spherical equivalent within ± 0.50 and ± 1.00 diopters of emmetropia, respectively. Likewise, a total of 86% and 95% of eyes had a postoperative absolute value of refractive cylinder of 0.50 or less and 1.00 or less diopters, respectively. Mean postoperative corrected distance visual acuity was 0.00 logMAR (20/20 Snellen). Mean values of postoperative monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity were 0.10 and 0.00 logMAR (20/25 and 20/20 Snellen), respectively. The aberrometric analysis confirmed that the magnitude of ocular higher-order aberrations was mainly due to corneal optics and that the corneal astigmatism correction was sufficient with the toric IOL. Mean absolute IOL misalignment was 3.5° with values ranging from 0° to 10°., Conclusions: The bitoric IOL AT TORBI 709M is able to provide a predictable correction of corneal astigmatism with low postoperative levels of ocular higher-order aberrations., (Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.)

Background: We investigated long-term safety and efficacy of sealed capsule irrigation (SCI) during cataract surgery to prevent posterior capsule opacification (PCO)., Methods: One eye of each of 17 patients (mean age: 70.1+/-9.7 years) who presented with bilateral cataracts was randomly chosen for SCI treatment. After phacoemulsification, the capsular bag was vacuum sealed with the PerfectCapsule device (Milvella) followed by SCI using distilled water for two minutes. No vacuum loss occurred during irrigation. Each patient's fellow eye served as a control. One hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens model was implanted in all eyes. Five patients had to be excluded due to deep anterior chamber, small pupil or unilateral surgery. Follow-up examinations took place one day and one, three, six, 12 and 24 months after surgery. We evaluated safety parameters, anterior capsule (AC) overlapping and PCO., Results: Postoperatively, mean best corrected visual acuity, pachymetry, endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure, AC overlapping and PCO showed no statistically significant difference between SCI and the control group (p>0.05, Wilcoxon test)., Conclusion: SCI is a safe procedure and enables the specific pharmacological targeting of lens epithelial cells inside the capsular bag. Using distilled water, however, it is not possible to reduce PCO development significantly. Thus, alternative substances should be evaluated.

Background: Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) is still a major long-term complication of modern cataract surgery. We evaluated the impact of sharp-edged intraocular lenses (IOLs) with different haptic designs made from the same hydrophobic acrylic material on posterior and anterior lens capsule opacification., Setting: Eye clinic of Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania. Prospective randomised clinical study., Methods: Seventy-four eyes of 74 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were included in a prospective randomised clinical study. Thirty-seven eyes of 37 patients received a three-piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, MA3OBA, Alcon) IOL; and thirty-seven eyes of 37 patients received a one-piece acrylic hydrophobic (AcrySof, SA3OAL, Alcon) IOL. Visual acuity, anterior capsule opacification (ACO), capsular folds, capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) were evaluated. ACO was assessed subjectively. PCO values in the entire IOL optic area and in the central 3 mm optic zone were assessed using a photographic image-analysis system (EPCO2000). Follow-ups were performed postoperatively at 1 day, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years., Results: There were no significant differences in best corrected visual acuity, grade of ACO and capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping between IOL types during the follow-up period. Patients in the one-piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group more frequently presented with capsular folds behind the IOL optic area than those in the three-piece IOL group. In the three-piece acrylic hydrophobic IOL group, PCO values (mean (SD)) of the entire IOL optic area were significantly lower six months postoperative (three-piece: 0.002 (0.009); one-piece: 0.007 (0.017); p=0.04), one year postoperative (three-piece: 0.004 (0.016); one-piece: 0.026 (0.041); p=0.001) as well as one year postoperative in the central 3 mm optic zone (three-piece: 0.000 (0.0002); one-piece: 0.019 (0.049); p=0.001). However, two years postoperative, the PCO values of the groups did not show significant differences (entire IOL optic area: three-piece, 0.136 (0.223); one-piece, 0.154 (0.190); p=0.18; central zone: three-piece, 0.023 (0.065); one-piece: 0.020 (0.039); p=0.44)., Conclusion: The 2 year follow-up after cataract surgery showed no significant difference in ACO and PCO development between three-piece and one-piece acrylic hydrophobic intraocular lenses.

Purpose: To compare the rate of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with the single-piece hydrophilic acrylic foldable Rayner Centerflex 570H intraocular lens (IOL), which has a sharp optic edge design excluding the optic-haptic junction, and the Rayner C-flex 570C IOL, which has an improved 360-degree sharp edge., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany., Methods: As part of a multicenter U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) study, 42 patients who had implantation of a C-flex IOL in 1 eye after uneventful phacoemulsification were enrolled. Six and 12 months postoperatively, PCO was evaluated by retroillumination photographs using Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 image-analysis software. The data were then compared with those in a matched group of patients with a Centerflex IOL who participated in a previous FDA study., Results: The mean age of the patients with the C-flex IOL was 71.5 years +/- 8.2 (SD) There was a statistically significant difference in EPCO scores between the C-flex group and Centerflex group. Six months after surgery, the mean EPCO value (total IOL optic) was 0.07 +/- 0.17 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.20 +/- 0.20 in the Centerflex group (n = 36) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). By 12 months, the mean had increased to 0.16 +/- 0.20 in the C-flex group (n = 37) and 0.35 +/- 0.22 in the Centerflex group (n = 31) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test)., Conclusions: The C-flex IOLs showed good functional results and significantly lower PCO formation than the earlier model Centerflex IOL. The enhanced edge of the C-flex IOL seemed to improve PCO prevention clinically.

Purpose: To evaluate the use of the Perfect Pupil system (Milvella Pty. Ltd.) in 3 eyes in cataract surgery with iridoschisis., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany., Methods: Patient 1 was an 83-year-old man with a nuclear cataract, pseudoexfoliation syndrome, and iridoschisis. He was also having systemic anticoagulation therapy. Preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.05 in the right eye and 0.08 in the left eye. Patient 2 was a 73-year-old mentally retarded man with a brunescent cataract in the right eye. Preoperative BCVA was 0.1., Results: In the first patient, cataract surgery was performed under topical anesthesia in both eyes through a clear corneal incision. Intraoperative pupil size was 3.0 mm. The Perfect Pupil device was inserted manually and fixated at the iris rim, leading to pupil dilation of 6.0 mm. Uneventful cataract surgery was performed without damage to the iris. Hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) were implanted with forceps. Postoperative BCVA was 0.5 in the right eye and 0.4 in the left eye. The second patient was operated on under general anesthesia. Pupil dilation was successfully achieved. The brunescent cataract was removed and a hydrophobic acrylic IOL was implanted with an injector, resulting in postoperative uncorrected visual acuity of 0.3., Conclusion: In iridoschisis patients, there is risk of aspiration of iris fibers during cataract surgery. In these 2 patients, this was prevented using the Perfect Pupil system.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of Nd : YAG laser capsulotomy after cataract surgery according to the type of intra-ocular lens material (PMMA, silicone, hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic) implanted in four European countries (France, Italy, Germany, Spain)., Design: A retrospective record review., Participants: A review of 1525 patients (first operated eye), aged 50 to 80 years, operated on for cataract in 1996 or 1997 in 16 surgical centers (4 per country)., Methods: The study employed a retrospective cohort design. Charts were reviewed to collect information during at least a three-year period following cataract surgery to identify patients who underwent Nd : YAG laser capsulotomy postoperatively., Main Outcome Measures: Data on the type of intra-ocular lens implanted was extracted from the patient notes, as was the date and outcome of the Nd : YAG laser intervention. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis with the time to Nd : YAG laser was performed on the data. RESULTS A total of 1525 patients (first operated eye) were available for the study (n = 294 for hydrophilic acrylic, n = 384 for PMMA, n = 421 for hydrophobic acrylic, n = 426 for silicone). There was a highly statistically significant difference between the IOL groups for the incidence of posterior capsule opacification (p < 0.001) and for Nd : YAG laser treatment (p < 0.001). The mean delay of Nd : YAG laser treatment from the date of cataract operation was 2.48 years (+/-1.70, ranging from 0 to 5.88 years). The rate of Nd : YAG laser capsulotomy over the follow-up period was lowest in the hydrophobic acrylic group (7.1%), followed by silicone (16.2%), PMMA (19.3%) and hydrophilic acrylic (31.1%), respectively., Conclusions: A low incidence of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) and Nd : YAG laser treatment was detected in hydrophobic acrylic IOLs in comparison to three other types of IOLs implanted in a large cohort of persons with age-related cataract. Choice of IOL type may reduce the need for Nd : YAG laser treatment, although further research on the reasons for this is needed.

Aim: To evaluate and to compare the preventive effect of different intraocular lenses from different material with a round or sharp optic edge design on posterior capsule opacification., Methods: Our clinical study included 165 patients. Mean follow-up was 12.4+/-0.9 months, mean patient age was 67.5+/-7.8 years. Patients in the group 1 (n=46) were implanted acrylic three-piece hydrophobic intraocular lenses, sharp optic edge (AcrySof, MA3OBA, Alcon), in the group 2 (n=38)--acrylic hydrophobic single piece intraocular lenses, sharp optic edge (AcrySof, SA3OAL, Alcon), in the group 3 (n=39)--silicone three-piece intraocular lenses, sharp optic edge (CeeOn 911A, Pharmacia), and in the group 4 (n=42)--polymethyl methacrylate single piece intraocular lenses, round optic edge (Crystal, 5T, Alcon). The posterior capsule opacification was evaluated for the entire optic and in the central 3-mm zone using EPCO 2000 Software., Results: Posterior capsule opacification values of the entire optic were 0.002+/-0.001 in the AcrySof MA3OBA group, 0.007+/-0.002 in the AcrySof SA3OAL group, 0.002+/-0.001 in the CeeOn 911A group, 0.029+/-0.008 in the polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens group 6 months after surgery. The values were 0.011+/-0.005, 0.025+/-0.006, 0.014+/-0.005 and 0.122+/-0.021, respectively, one year after surgery. The intraocular lenses types with sharp-edge design (acrylic and silicone) showed significantly lower posterior capsule opacification values than round-edge optic design polymethyl methacrylate lenses (p<0.05). Posterior capsule opacification values of the central 3-mm zone were 0.000+/-0.000 in the AcrySof MA3OBA group, 0.001+/-0.001 in the AcrySof SA3OAL group, 0.000+/-0.000 in the CeeOn 911A group, 0.002+/-0.001 in the polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens group 6 months after surgery. The values were 0.0001+/-0.0001, 0.018+/-0.007, 0.004+/-0.002 and 0.028+/-0.009, respectively, one year after surgery. Posterior capsule opacification values differences between AcrySof MA3OBA and polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lenses' groups and between CeeOn 911A and polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lenses' groups one year after cataract surgery were established (p<0.05)., Conclusions: The sharp-edge foldable intraocular lenses types (AcrySof MA3OBA, AcrySof SA3OAL, CeeOn 911A) showed statistically significant difference in posterior capsule opacification values in one-year follow-up time. The effect of these foldable lenses for prevention of posterior capsule opacification is mainly a result of rectangular, sharp-edged optic design, which creates a sharp capsular bend. A role of material of intraocular lenses (hydrophobic acrylate and silicone) in prevention of posterior capsule opacification during one-year follow-up was not established.

Purpose: To quantitatively evaluate and compare intraocular lenses (IOLs) with a round or sharp optic edge design for posterior capsule opacification (PCO)., Study Design: Prospective comparative observational case series. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS: Photographs from 174 eyes were analyzed for PCO at the Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany., Main Outcome Measures: Part I: 121 eyes of 121 patients were analyzed for quantification of PCO. IOLs evaluated were Corneal ACR6 (n = 21), Alcon Acrysof (n = 20), Allergan AR40 (n = 27), Pharmacia 811 one-piece polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) IOL (n = 24), and Pharmacia 911A silicone IOL (n = 29). Mean follow-up was 14.01 +/- 2.81 months; mean patient age was 73.2 +/- 7.3 years. The morphologic PCO formation was evaluated for the entire optic and in the central 3-mm zone. Part II: In 53 eyes of 46 patients aged 73.4 +/- 10.8 years with an Alcon Acrysof IOL, PCO formation and capsulorrhexis/optic overlapping were analyzed 34.2 +/- 4 months after cataract surgery using EPCO Software., Results: Part I: The PCO values of the entire optic were for Corneal ACR6, 1.93 +/- 0.62; PMMA, 0.64 +/- 0.63; AR40, 0.55 +/- 0.28; Alcon Acrysof, 0.145 +/- 0.27; and 0.161 +/- 0.181 for the Pharmacia 911A IOL (P < 0.01). The PCO values of the central 3-mm zone were for Corneal ACR6, 1.64 +/- 0.96; PMMA, 0.49 +/- 0.39; AR40, 0.22 +/- 0.32; Alcon Acrysof, 0.08 +/- 0.21; and 0.06 +/- 0.11 for the Pharmacia 911A IOL (P < 0.01). Part II: Average overlapping of capsulorrhexis and Acrysof IOL optic was 40.5% +/- 12.4%. There was a significant correlation between PCO values and overlapping (r = -0.69, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: The sharp-edge IOL types (Alcon Acrysof and Pharmacia 911A silicone IOL) resulted in statistically significantly lower PCO values for analysis of the entire optic area and central 3-mm zone. There was no statistically significant difference in PCO values between the two sharp-edge optic IOLs. An overlapping of capsulorrhexis rim and the anterior IOL optic surface of more than 20% resulted in significantly lower PCO values with the Acrysof IOL.

Cataract surgery can lead to inflammatory processes in the retina due to its invasive nature, resulting in prolonged recovery times and reduced functional outcomes. The aim of the current study is to explore the impact that phacoemulsification parameters have on macular thickness following surgery. This prospective single-center study enrolled 46 healthy patients (46 eyes) who underwent uneventful cataract surgery. Retinal thickness was assessed using optical coherence tomography (OCT) preoperatively, as well as 1, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery. The macula was divided into a central (CMT), inner (IMT), and outer ring (OMT). Cataract density was automatically determined using an anterior segment OCT and a custom MATLAB script. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) as well as cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), ultrasound time (UT), and fluids used during phacoemulsification were recorded. Retinal thickness and volume increased significantly following cataract surgery, reaching its maximum 4 weeks post-operatively. Statistically significant correlations were found between the CDE and IMT, OMT and retinal volume change (rIMT = 0.356, rOMT = 0.298, rvolume = 0.357 with p < 0.05) as well as between the ultrasound time and IMT, OMT, and retinal volume change (rIMT = 0.369, rOMT = 0.293 and rvolume = 0.409 with p < 0.05). Changes in CMT did not correlate with any surgical metrics. Additionally, no correlation was found to the amount of fluid used, whether CDVA or IOP. However, a link between nuclear cataract density and changes in OMT (r = 0.310, p < 0.05) was established. How ultrasound energy impacts the choroidea, and to what extent retinal metabolism changes after surgery, needs to be explored in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Preoperative and postoperative diagnostics play an important role in ensuring the safety of patients with phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs). The risk of endothelial cell loss can be addressed by regularly measuring the endothelial cell density using specular microscopy and considering the endothelial cell loss rate and the endothelial reserve in accordance with the patient's age when deciding whether to explant a pIOL. The anterior chamber morphometrics, including the anterior chamber depth and the distance between the pIOL and the endothelium, measured using Scheimpflug tomography and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), can help to assess the risk of the endothelial cell loss. In patients undergoing posterior chamber pIOL implantation, accurate prediction of the vault and its postoperative measurements using AS-OCT or Scheimpflug tomography are important when assessing the risk of anterior subcapsular cataract and secondary glaucoma. Novel approaches based on ultrasound biomicroscopy and AS-OCT have been proposed to increase the vault prediction accuracy and to identify eyes in which prediction errors are more likely. Careful patient selection and regular postoperative follow-up visits can reduce the complication risk and enable early intervention if a complication occurs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study is to quantitatively assess lens opacity, using a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) device for anterior segment assessment, and establish the correlation with Scheimpflug imaging, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and cumulative dissipated energy (CDE). This prospective cross-sectional single-center study enrolled 51 patients (51 eyes) with crystalline lens opacity. Patients with previous ocular surgery, pathologies or general disorders affecting vision were excluded. Eyes were scanned with an SS-OCT device, and lens densitometry was automatically analyzed using a custom MATLAB script which examined lens density, nuclear density and linear density. The same analyses were performed on Scheimpflug images. Preoperative CDVA and CDE during phacoemulsification were recorded. Spearman's (ρ) and Pearson's (r) correlation coefficients were assessed according to data normality. Statistically significant correlations were established between SS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging using lens analysis (ρ = 0.47, p < 0.001), nuclear analysis (ρ = 0.73, p < 0.001) and linear analysis (r = 0.44, p < 0.001). A significant correlation with CDE was found with all the SS-OCT methods (r = 0.57, p < 0.001). Only the nuclear analysis of the SS-OCT scans (Tb = −0.33, p < 0.01) and Pentacam Nucleus Staging (Tb = −0.26, p < 0.05) showed a statistically significant correlation with CDVA. Good inter-device agreement in lens densitometry was found. However, SS-OCT yielded improved lens imaging compared with the Scheimpflug device and a higher correlation with clinical parameters. Thus, high-resolution SS-OCT has the potential to become a preferable option for automatic cataract grading and preoperative planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using a new optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer and compare the results with those obtained with a partial coherence interferometry (PCI) optical biometer. Setting: International Vision Correction Research Centre, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Methods: Biometry measurements in eyes of cataract patients were performed by the same examiner with an OLCR biometer (Lenstar LS 900/Allegro Biograph) and a PCI optical biometer (IOLMaster). After determination of axial length (AL), corneal radii values by keratometry (R1 and R2), and anterior chamber depth (ACD), power calculation for an AcrySof MA60AC IOL was compared between the 2 devices using 4 formulas and the corresponding IOL constants. The target was emmetropia. Results: One hundred eyes of 100 cataract patients (mean age 70.0 years ± 10.6 [SD]) were measured. Of the biometry parameters, the only statistically significant differences between the 2 devices were in R2 (mean difference 0.02 ± 0.05 mm), (R1 + R2)/2 (mean difference 0.01 ± 0.04 mm), and ACD (mean difference 0.05 ± 0.11 mm) (P<.01, Wilcoxon test). The mean differences in IOL power calculations using the 4 formulas were not statistically significant between the 2 devices (P>.01, Wilcoxon test). Conclusion: The OLCR biometry device provided precise and valid measurements and thus can be used for the preoperative examination of cataract patients. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]