Search

Introduction: In the United States, a total of 268,490 men were found to have prostate cancer in 2022, thus making it the most common cancer in men, accounting for 27% of all cancers in the male population. Among all cancers in men, it was the fifth leading cause of death, with 34,500 deaths and a mortality rate of 11%. In 2019, the total number of cases was 94,748, making it the leading cancer in males, accounting for 11% of all male cancers. In terms of mortality, it ranked seventh, with 13,217 deaths and a mortality rate of 1.6%. However, new treatment options for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) have emerged. Docetaxel has been shown to be effective for both mCSPC and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Upfront docetaxel has not been approved in Japan, nor has it been validated in large-scale studies. Furthermore, several agents can be used after docetaxel treatment, but it is unclear which is the most effective. We used a large Japanese health insurance database to determine which agent would be the most effective as a next-line therapy in patients who had received docetaxel. Materials and Methods: We used data from medical institutions using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC), which provides a comprehensive evaluation of medical classifications. The Medical Data Vision database covers approximately 23% of DPC hospitals in Japan. This study analyzed 2938 patients with mCSPC who received docetaxel, followed by CRPC, between April 2008 and December 2021. The study focused on three agents: enzalutamide, abiraterone acetate, and cabazitaxel. Other agents were excluded due to the small number of patients. The following data were analyzed: age, date of CRPC diagnosis, presence of bone metastasis, drug type, and prognosis. Results: This study included 1997 patients with CRPC after upfront docetaxel therapy for mCSPC (enzalutamide [ENZ] group, n = 998; abiraterone acetate [ABI] group, n = 617; and cabazitaxel [CBZ] group, n = 382). The overall survival (OS) time from drug initiation was 456 days in the enzalutamide group, which was significantly longer than that in the cabazitaxel group (p = 0.017, HR 0.94) (ENZ: ABI p = 0.54, HR 0.94; ABI: CBZ p = 0.14, HR 0.75). OS was also compared for the third-line drug in the group that received enzalutamide as the second-line drug, the group that used abiraterone acetate as the third-line drug (ENZ-ABI group), and the group that used abiraterone acetate as the second-line drug. OS from the start of the third-line drug was compared between the ENZ–ABI group and the ABI–ENZ group, which received enzalutamide as the third-line drug, but showed no significant difference (269 vs. 281 days, p = 0.85; HR 1.03). Conclusion: ENZ was shown to prolong OS relative to cabazitaxel after the cessation of docetaxel. ENZ was associated with a longer duration of drug use than ABI and CBZ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the widespread availability of medication choices for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), biomarkers to predict the efficacy of each mCRPC treatment have not yet been established. This study developed a prognostic nomogram and a calculator to predict the prognosis of patients with mCRPC who received abiraterone acetate (ABI) and/or enzalutamide (ENZ). Methods: In total, 568 patients with mCRPC who underwent ABI and/or ENZ between 2012 and 2017 were enrolled. A prognostic nomogram based on the risk factors was developed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model and clinically important factors. The discriminatory ability of the nomogram was assessed according to the concordance index (C-index). A 5-fold cross-validation was repeated 2000 times to estimate the C-index, and the means of the estimated C-index for the training and validation sets were determined. A calculator based on this nomogram was then developed. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 24.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that the time to CRPC, pre-chemotherapy, baseline prostate-specific antigen, baseline alkaline phosphatase, and baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels were independent risk factors for OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.521, 1.681, 1.439, 1.827, and 12.123, p = 0.001, 0.001, < 0.001, 0.019, and < 0.001, respectively). The C-index was 0.72 in the training cohort and 0.71 in the validation cohort. Conclusions: We developed a nomogram and calculator to predict OS in Japanese patients with mCRPC who received ABI and/or ENZ. Reproducible prognostic prediction calculators for mCRPC will facilitate greater accessibility for clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis. The prevalence of mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway genes, including BRCA1/2, as well as treatment patterns and clinical outcomes, are not well characterized among Japanese men with mCRPC. Methods: This multicenter, noninterventional cohort study enrolled Japanese men with mCRPC from 24 institutions between 2014 and 2018. Mutations in the 15 HRR‐related genes were assessed using archival primary or metastatic tumor samples. Patterns of sequential therapies for mCRPC were investigated. Patients were followed up for survival evaluation including prostate‐specific antigen progression‐free survival (PSA‐PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 143 patients analyzed, HRR‐related mutations were detected in 51 patients (35.7%). The most frequently mutated genes were CDK12 (N = 19, 13.3%), followed by BRCA2 (N = 18, 12.6%), ATM (N = 8, 5.6%), and CHEK2 (N = 3, 2.1%). The most common type of first‐line therapy for mCRPC was next‐generation hormonal agents (NHA, 44.4%), followed by first‐generation antiandrogens (FGA, 30.3%), and taxanes (22.5%). Commonly prescribed first−/second‐line sequential regimens included FGA/NHA (17.6%), NHA/NHA (15.5%), and NHA/taxanes (14.1%). The median PSA‐PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 5.6 and 26.1 months, respectively. Patients carrying BRCA1/2 mutations had numerically shorter PSA‐PFS (median 3.3 vs. 5.9 months) and OS (median 20.7 vs. 27.3 months) than those without mutations. Conclusions: In conclusion, approximately one‐third of Japanese patients with mCRPC carried mutations in HRR‐related genes in this study. The real‐world outcomes of mCRPC are poor with conventional therapy, warranting an expansion of treatment options based on genetic abnormalities of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures can provide valuable information in evaluating patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Post hoc analysis of the AFTERCAB study was conducted to evaluate the HRQoL benefit of enzalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to flutamide plus ADT for the treatment of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in Japan. Methods: The open-label AFTERCAB study was conducted from November 2016 to March 2020 in Japanese men aged ≥ 20 years with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic CRPC. Patients received enzalutamide plus ADT or flutamide plus ADT, respectively, as first-line alternative androgen therapy (AAT). HRQoL was analyzed through the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate, EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level instruments, Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form, and Brief Fatigue Inventory. The longitudinal changes in HRQoL, HRQoL deterioration based on minimally important difference (MID), and time to HRQoL deterioration were evaluated for first-line AAT. Results: Overall, HRQoL between the enzalutamide and flutamide groups was similar during first-line treatment. No statistically significant HRQoL difference in change from baseline to week 61 (least square mean difference; p value) was observed. Furthermore, proportions of pain progression, symptom worsening, and HRQoL deterioration based on MID, were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: The results were similar in all subscales of each PRO, demonstrating similar HRQoL deterioration based on MID criteria between the enzalutamide and flutamide groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The ALSYMPCA trial revealed radium‐223 (Ra‐223) to be a life‐prolonging agent for bone metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, only 2.8% of enrolled patients in that clinical trial were Asian, and no Japanese patients were enrolled. Several retrospective studies have been published concerning Japanese bone metastatic CRPC patients receiving Ra‐223. However, no study has yet reported the correlation between Ra‐223 induction and the survival in Japanese bone metastatic CRPC patients. This study investigated the effect of Ra‐223 as a life‐prolonging agent in a large Japanese healthcare fee database. Methods: A total of around 410 000 prostate cancer patients were extracted from this database, and 25 934 were diagnosed with CRPC. In these patients, the age, date of the CRPC diagnosis, date of Ra‐223 induction, and prognosis were analyzed. Results: A total of 1628 patients received Ra‐223, and 6693 patients were diagnosed with bone metastasis CRPC, with the remaining 17 613 patients diagnosed with CRPC without bone metastasis. The patients who completed six courses of Ra‐223 showed a significantly more favorable overall and cancer‐specific survival than those who received ≤5 courses (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). For time from CRPC diagnosis date to death, the Ra‐223 induction group showed a significantly more favorable prognosis with regard to both the overall and cancer‐specific survival than the bone metastatic CRPC patients without Ra‐223 (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions: Bone metastatic CRPC patients who received Ra‐223 showed a significantly better prognosis than bone metastatic CPRC patients who did not receive Ra‐223. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of the study is to evaluate real-world effectiveness and safety of enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in Japan. Methods: This was a retrospective evaluation of medical records from men in Japan who started enzalutamide treatment from November 1, 2014, to March 31, 2018, and received androgen deprivation therapy throughout. The primary endpoint was time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression. Secondary endpoints included PSA response rate, time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy, time to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy, and enzalutamide treatment duration. An exploratory analysis of metastasis-free survival (MFS) was also performed. Adverse events (AEs) were analyzed to assess safety. Results: Based on data from medical records of 205 men in Japan, median time to PSA progression was 27 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 19–not reached [NR]), with 82.5% and 52.0% of men achieving PSA response rates of ≥ 50% and ≥ 90%, respectively. Median time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy was 36 months (95% CI 27−NR) and median enzalutamide treatment duration was 13 months (interquartile range: 7–24). Median time to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy was NR (95% CI 41−NR). Median MFS was 29 months (95% CI 23−35). In total, 51.7% of men experienced AEs, with malaise (18.5%), decreased appetite (10.7%), and nausea (4.9%) the most frequently reported. Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate the real-world effectiveness and safety of enzalutamide in men with nmCRPC in Japan, further informing healthcare providers about available treatment options for this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We evaluated the predictive factors for completion of all six cycles of radium-223 (Ra-223) treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We also developed a novel prediction model for Ra-223 treatment completion using these predictors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 122 patients with mCRPC who were treated with Ra-223. The predictive factors for the completion of six cycles of Ra-223 treatment were evaluated. Statistically significant predictive factors were then used to develop a prediction model for treatment completion. Finally, using this prediction model, we classified the overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort into three groups. Results: We identified three significant variables as the predictive factors for treatment completion: baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level, baseline hemoglobin (Hb) level, and baseline pain. The three groups generated using the prediction model were: group 1 (patients with three predictive factors, i.e., ALP < median, Hb ≥ median, and no pain), group 2 (patients with one to two predictive factors), and group 3 (patients without any predictive factors). The treatment completion rates differed between the three groups significantly. Furthermore, the OS also differed among the groups significantly. Conclusion: Our study suggested that the baseline ALP level, baseline Hb level, and baseline pain were the predictive factors of completion of all six cycles of Ra-223 treatment in patients with mCRPC. Our prediction model consisting of these factors could predict not only the completion of Ra-223 treatment, but also the post-treatment survival. This model can thus be useful for selection of patients for Ra-223 treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Darolutamide, an oral androgen receptor inhibitor, has been approved for treating nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), based on significant improvements in metastasis-free survival (MFS) in the ARAMIS clinical trial. Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in Japanese patients are reported here. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 1509 patients with nmCRPC and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time ≤ 10 months were randomized 2:1 to darolutamide 600 mg twice daily or matched placebo while continuing androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was MFS. Results: In Japan, 95 patients were enrolled and randomized to darolutamide (n = 62) or placebo (n = 33). At the primary analysis (cut-off date: September 3, 2018), after 20 primary end-point events had occurred, median MFS was not reached with darolutamide vs. 18.2 months with placebo (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11–0.70). Median OS was not reached due to limited numbers of events in both groups but favored darolutamide in the Japanese subgroup. Time to pain progression, time to PSA progression, and PSA response also favored darolutamide. Among Japanese patients randomized to darolutamide vs. placebo, incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 85.5 vs. 63.6%, and incidences of treatment discontinuation due to TEAEs were 8.1 vs. 6.1%. Conclusions: Efficacy outcomes favored darolutamide in Japanese patients with nmCRPC, supporting the clinical benefit of darolutamide in this patient population. Darolutamide was well tolerated; however, due to the small sample size, it is impossible to conclude with certainty whether differences in the safety profile exist between Japanese and overall ARAMIS populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apalutamide + androgen deprivation therapy versus androgen deprivation therapy alone in Japanese patients with metastatic castration‐sensitive prostate cancer from the phase 3, randomized, global TITAN study. Methods: Men with metastatic castration‐sensitive prostate cancer randomly (1:1) received 240 mg apalutamide + androgen deprivation therapy or matching placebo + androgen deprivation therapy. The primary efficacy endpoints were radiographic progression‐free survival and overall survival. Secondary efficacy endpoints were time to cytotoxic chemotherapy, pain progression, chronic opioid use, and skeletal‐related events. Safety was also assessed. Results: Of the 1052 patients included in the TITAN study, 51 (4.85%) were Japanese (apalutamide group, n = 28; placebo group, n = 23). In all, 81.8% of patients in the apalutamide and 71.8% in the placebo group did not experience radiographic progression or death, and the hazard ratio for radiographic progression‐free survival favored treatment with apalutamide (hazard ratio 0.712, 95% confidence interval 0.205–2.466; P = 0.59). At 24 months, 85.7% of patients in the apalutamide group and 81.5% in the placebo group were alive, and the hazard ratio for overall survival favored apalutamide (hazard ratio 0.840, 95% confidence interval 0.210–3.361; P = 0.805). In the interim analysis, the median radiographic progression‐free survival and overall survival were not reached in the apalutamide group and time to cytotoxic chemotherapy was delayed following apalutamide treatment. The safety profile of apalutamide in the Japanese subpopulation was comparable with that of the global population, except for skin rash. Conclusions: The results of the present analyses suggest that apalutamide + androgen deprivation therapy in Japanese patients had favorable efficacy compared with androgen deprivation therapy alone, and these findings are comparable to those in the overall population. Apalutamide + androgen deprivation therapy can be considered as one of the therapeutic options for a broad spectrum of metastatic castration‐sensitive prostate cancer regardless of prior treatment and disease extent in Japanese patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Apalutamide, a nonsteroidal potent androgen receptor antagonist, was safe and effective in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and metastatic-CRPC (mCRPC) in global studies. In this phase 1 study, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of apalutamide were evaluated in Japanese patients with mCRPC. Methods: In this open-label, multi-center study, patients received apalutamide 240 mg (once-daily, orally) for first 1 week (PK week) during which PK parameters were assessed. 1 week later (Cycle 1 Day1), after reassessing safety, continuous daily dosing (4 weeks/cycle; once-daily orally) was initiated. Endpoints evaluated were: safety, tolerability, PK and antitumour efficacy of apalutamide. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were evaluated during PK week and Cycle 1. Results: All six patients received apalutamide. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were abdominal discomfort, nasopharyngitis, dysgeusia, rash, and hot flush [2/6 patients (33.3%) each]. No death or DLTs were reported. Grade 3 TEAEs were spinal-cord compression and renal disorder (1/6 patient each). In continuous daily dosing period, PK steady-state of apalutamide was reached approximately by week 4. A significant accumulation of apalutamide was observed (mean accumulation index 3.55), based on AUC0–24. Median (range) serum prostate-specific antigen level decreased from 54.42 (8.92–310.11) ng/mL at baseline to 11.70 (0.37–47.74) ng/mL at week 12 with ≥ 50% reduction in 4/6 (66.7%) patients and 90% reduction in 2/6 (33.3%) patients. Conclusion: Apalutamide had manageable safety profile, without any DLT or any new safety signals, and favourable efficacy in Japanese mCRPC patients. Thus, it was ascertained to be an adequate dosage regimen in Japanese mCRPC patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02162836. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Automated bone scan index (aBSI) change (ΔBSI) after treatment and survival in men with prostate cancer remains unclear. We evaluated the correlation between ΔBSI after cabazitaxel and overall survival (OS) in men with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 32 men with bone metastatic CRPC who had received cabazitaxel. The correlation between ΔBSI from baseline to 16 weeks after starting cabazitaxel and OS was analyzed by multivariate analysis. Results: Median age and time to CRPC were 70.7 years and 9.5 months, respectively. The median cycles of docetaxel before cabazitaxel were eight. Ten (31.2%) patients had visceral metastases at baseline. Median baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 123.0 ng/mL. The median aBSIs at baseline and 16 weeks after cabazitaxel were 3.2 and 4.4%, respectively. Improvements in aBSI and PSA after 16 weeks of cabazitaxel occurred in 7 (21.9%) and 12 patients (37.5%), respectively. There were no correlations between ΔBSI and OS (p = 0.55), but PSA change was significantly correlated with OS (p = 0.03) by multivariate analysis. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that ΔBSI from baseline to16 weeks after starting cabazitaxel was not correlated with OS among men with bone metastatic CRPC. Further prospective studies may be warranted to confirm the limited utility of aBSI in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

GnRH antagonist and GnRH agonist are widely used as androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer. A previous report demonstrated that patients with PSA levels of >20 ng/mL using GnRH antagonists showed favorable outcomes in comparison to those using GnRH agonists. An 82-year old male patient with edema, a stony hard nodule on his prostate, and an initial PSA level of 6,717 ng/mL was referred to our hospital due to suspected prostate cancer. He received prostate needle biopsy and was diagnosed with prostate cancer with bone metastasis, with a Gleason Score of 4 + 4 = 8. He was then treated with a GnRH agonist (leuprorelin acetate) and bicalutamide from July 2015. Although his PSA level decreased to 582.0 ng/mL in December 2015, his PSA level gradually increased and CRPC developed. He indicated that he did not wish to take 2nd generation anti-androgen drugs or receive systemic chemotherapy. We introduced a GnRH antagonist (degarelix) in February 2015; his PSA level did not change and his CRPC was controlled. We herein report a case in which changing a GnRH agonist to a GnRH antagonist contributed to CRPC control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Radium-223 is a first-in-class targeted alpha therapy to prolong overall survival (OS) in castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases (mCRPC). The aim of the present analysis was to assess the long-term safety with radium-223 in Japanese patients with mCRPC. Methods: Patients with symptomatic mCRPC, ≥ 2 bone metastases and no known visceral metastases received up to 6 injections of radium-223 (55 kBq/kg), one every 4 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) considered to be related to radium-223 were reported until 3 years after the first injection. Pre-specified conditions, such as acute myelogenous leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, aplastic anemia, primary bone cancer, or other primary malignancies, were reported regardless of causality. Results: Of the 49 patients enrolled in the study, 44 (89.8%) entered the survival follow-up period and 33 (67.3%) died. Throughout the entire study, there were no reports of second primary malignancy or other pre-specified conditions. Eight patients (16.3%) experienced post-treatment drug-related AEs, which were all hematological (anemia and decreased lymphocyte, platelet, and white blood cell counts). No serious post-treatment drug-related AEs were reported. Updated median OS was 19.3 months (95% CI: 14.2, 28.5). Conclusions: In Japanese patients with symptomatic mCRPC and bone metastases, radium-223 had a favorable long-term safety profile with no second primary malignancies reported. Taken together with median OS, which was comparable to that in the pivotal phase III ALSYMPCA study, these results support continued benefit from radium-223 in Japanese patients with mCRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dysgeusia is an adverse effect caused by enzalutamide said to affect 1–5% of patients. The reported management strategies include a temporary drug holiday, the prescription of herbal medicine, and changing the timing of enzalutamide intake from morning to before sleep at night. Case 1: A 72-year-old man developed castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and was administered enzalutamide. After six weeks of enzalutamide installation, he showed taste alternation, and consequently his dysgeusia increased to grade 2; we therefore changed the medicine intake time from morning to night just before sleep without dose reduction. Four weeks after changing the timing, his dysgeusia had improved. Case 2: A 63-year-old man had developed bone metastatic CRPC, so the combination of Ra-223 and enzalutamide (160 mg/body) was introduced. His serum PSA level had gradually decreased, but dysgeusia appeared, so we changed the timing of enzalutamide intake from morning to night just before sleep without dose reduction. One month after changing the timing, his dysgeusia had improved. We herein report two cases of enzalutamide-induced dysgeusia successfully treated by changing the timing of drug intake from morning intake to just before sleep. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While the overall survival of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has been prolonged by enzalutamide, a considerable number of patients suffer from enzalutamide-induced nausea and fatigue. An 86-year-old male patient who started enzalutamide (160 mg) for CRPC treatment, experienced nausea and vomiting approximately 2 weeks after the start of treatment. Enzalutamide treatment was stopped for two weeks, then restarted enzalutamide at a half-dose (80 mg); the dose was then increased to 120 mg. He remained free from any adverse events and showed good CRPC control for 53 months. We herein report the case of a patient with enzalutamide-induced nausea and vomiting, whose symptoms were overcome and in whom long-term CRPC control was achieved following a temporary drug holiday. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Low-molecular-weight protein tyrosine phosphatase (LMW-PTP) expression affects carcinogenesis in various cancers and has been associated with determining the overall survival among men with metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC). In this study, we analyzed the value of LMWPTP for prediction of time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) for men with mHNPC. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 45 men with mHNPC who were diagnosed from 2003 to 2009. All patients had received androgen deprivation therapy as first-line treatment. Prostate cancer tissues (pre-treatment needle biopsies) were immunohistochemically stained for LMW-PTP. Multivariate analyses (Cox proportional hazard model) were used to correlate baseline clinical factors of age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason scores, T stage, N stage, extent of disease on bone scan (EOD), LMW-PTP expression and time to CRPC. Continuous variables were classified as dichotomous. Results: Median age and PSA were 70.0 years and 87.8 ng/mL respectively. Median time to CRPC was 40.2 months. Median time to CRPC was significantly shorter in the high LMW-PTP group (14.8 months) than that in the low LMW-PTP group (86.3 months, p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, age ≥70 years and high LMW-PTP expression were significant predictors of time to CRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A computer-assisted diagnostic system for analyzing bone scans (BONENAVI) calculates the automated bone scan index (aBSI). Here we evaluated the aBSI as a prognostic imaging biomarker for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with cabazitaxel.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients who received cabazitaxel for mCRPC and evaluated the ability of the aBSI to predict overall survival (OS). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the associations between baseline aBSI at cabazitaxel treatment and OS with the clinical variables as follows: age, number of cycles of docetaxel, serum prostate-specific antigen, hemoglobin (Hb), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and alkaline phosphatase. We determined the C-index to evaluate the discriminatory ability of our models when we included or excluded the aBSI from the analyses.Results: The median OS after cabazitaxel treatment was 10.0 months, and patients with aBSI ≤1% achieved significantly longer OS compared with patients with aBSI ≥1%. Multivariate analysis showed that age, Hb, LDH, and aBSI were independent prognostic factors of OS. Adding aBSI to the base model increased the C-index from 0.78 to 0.80.Conclusions: The aBSI may serve as a useful imaging biomarker for predicting OS among men with mCRPC treated with cabazitaxel. Prospective studies are required to establish the value of aBSI as prognostic imaging biomarker. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message: Lenalidomide has been developed as the derivative of thalidomide that has fewer side effects. We herein report a rare case of castration‐resistant prostate cancer successfully maintained using lenalidomide for multiple myeloma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In most cases, prostate cancer metastasizes to the lymph nodes, bone, and liver. In very rare cases, it metastasizes to the ureter. Due to the difficulty in making a preoperative diagnosis, ureteral metastasis from prostate cancer is typically diagnosed after nephroureterectomy.Case Presentation: A 77-year-old Asian Japanese man with right hydronephrosis and hydroureter was referred to our hospital to undergo further examination due to the suspicion of ureteral cancer. He had been diagnosed 2 years previously with prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 4+5=9. He received radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. A nephroureterectomy was performed for suspected right ureteral cancer. On the basis of a histopathological examination, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma was suspected, and the tumor cells were positive for prostate-specific antigen immunohistochemically.Conclusions: We herein report a rare case of ureteral metastasis in castration resistant prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Persistent androgen synthesis under castration status in adrenal gland, testes and tumor cells is thought to be one of the major causes of development and progression of castration-resistant prostate cancer ( CRPC). Abiraterone acetate ( AA), the prodrug of abiraterone, which is an inhibitor of androgen synthesis enzymes, was evaluated for pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, preliminary efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with CRPC in a phase-1, open-label and dose-escalation study. Chemotherapy-naïve Japanese CRPC patients ( N = 27) received one of four AA daily doses (250 mg [ n = 9], 500 mg [ n = 6], 1000 [1 h premeal] mg [ n = 6] and 1000 [2 h postmeal] mg [ n = 6]) continuously through 28-day treatment cycles. In the first cycle, AA monotherapy was given on days 1-7 for pharmacokinetics, and AA plus prednisone (5 mg twice daily) from days 8 to 28. Of 27 patients, 9 continued treatment with AA until the data cut-off date (18 July 2013). Over the evaluated dose range, plasma abiraterone concentrations increased with dose, with median tmax 2-3 h. At each dose level, mean serum corticosterone concentrations increased, while testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations rapidly decreased following a single AA dose and were further reduced to near the quantification limit on day 8 regardless of the dose. At least 3 patients from each dose-group experienced ≥50% prostate-specific antigen reduction, suggesting clinical benefit from AA in Japanese CRPC patients. AA was generally well-tolerated, and, therefore, the recommended AA dosage regimen in Japanese CRPC patients is 1000 mg oral dose under modified fasting conditions (at least 1 h premeal or 2 h postmeal). This study is registered at : NCT01186484. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prostate cancer is the most common disease in elderly Japanese men.1,2 A geriatric assessment is therefore required for prostate cancer patients. At our institution, we assessed the G8 score for 76 localized prostate cancer patients, and the mean score was 15.2 for patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, 14.1 for those who underwent radiotherapy and 13.6 for those who underwent androgen deprivation therapy. In that study, the mean G8 score for localized prostate cancer was 14.5, the G8 score for those who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was 15.0, radiotherapy was 14.0 and androgen deprivation therapy was 12.0. [Extracted from the article]

In June 2018, the form of ENZ was changed from a 40-mg capsule (21 × 10 mm in size) to a 40-mg tablet pill (10.1 mm in diameter) or an 80-mg tablet pill (17.2 × 9.1 mm) in Japan and Germany. For the 25 CRPC patients, the mean number of drugs administered was six, with a total of 11 capsules and/or tablet pills. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Inflammatory cytokine markers, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, play important roles as prognostic markers in several solid malignancies, including prostate cancer. We previously reported the NLR as a poor prognostic marker in bladder cancer, upper-urothelial carcinoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, penile cancer, and prostate cancer. This study examined the importance of the NLR as a prognostic marker for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients who received abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide.Methods: A total of 805 prostate cancer patients developed in CRPC status were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 449 received abiraterone acetate (ABI; 188 cases) or enzalutamide (ENZ; 261 cases) treatment, and the pre-treatment NLR values of these patients were obtained. We investigated the prognosis in those with higher and lower NLR values.Results: The median NLR was 2.90, and a receiver operating characteristics analysis suggested a candidate cut-off point of 3.02. The median overall survival (OS) was 17.3 months in the higher NLR group (≥3.02) and 27.3 months in the lower NLR group (< 3.02) (p < 0.0001). This trend was also observed in both the ABI and ENZ groups (ABI: 29.3 vs. 15.1 months; ENZ: NR vs. 19.5 months; p < 0.0001 and < 0.0001, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed that a higher NLR was an independent risk factor. The NLR value was thus shown to be correlated with the prostate cancer progression.Conclusions: A higher NLR was associated with a poorer OS for CRPC patients who received ABI or ENZ. The NLR was positively correlated with prostate cancer progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A correction to the article "Patient preferences for treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer in Japan: a discrete-choice experiment" in the previous issue is presented.

The phase 3 SPARTAN study evaluated apalutamide versus placebo in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and prostate-specific antigen doubling time of ≤10 mo. At primary analysis, apalutamide improved median metastasis-free survival (MFS) by 2 yr and overall survival (OS) data were immature. We report the prespecified event-driven final analysis for OS. A total of 1207 patients with nmCRPC (diagnosed by conventional imaging) were randomised 2:1 to apalutamide (240 mg/d) or placebo, plus on-going androgen deprivation therapy. After MFS was met and the study was unblinded, 76 (19%) patients still receiving placebo crossed over to apalutamide. OS and time to cytotoxic chemotherapy (TTChemo) were analysed by group-sequential testing with O'Brien-Fleming-type alpha spending function. At median 52-mo follow-up, 428 deaths had occurred. The median treatment duration was 32.9 mo for apalutamide group and 11.5 mo for placebo group. Median OS was markedly longer with apalutamide versus placebo, reaching prespecified statistical significance (73.9 vs 59.9 mo, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.64–0.96]; p = 0.016). Apalutamide also lengthened TTChemo versus placebo (HR: 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49–0.81]; p = 0.0002). Discontinuation rates in apalutamide and placebo groups due to progressive disease were 43% and 74%, and due to adverse events 15% and 8.4%, respectively. Subsequent life-prolonging therapy was received by 371 (46%) patients in the apalutamide arm and by 338 (84%) patients in the placebo arm including 59 patients who received apalutamide after crossover. Safety was consistent with previous reports; when adverse events were adjusted for treatment exposure, rash had the greatest difference of incidence between the apalutamide and placebo groups. Extension of OS with apalutamide compared with placebo conferred impactful benefit in patients with nmCRPC. There was a 22% reduction in the hazard of death in the apalutamide group despite 19% crossover (placebo to apalutamide) and higher rates of subsequent therapy in the placebo group. With data presented herein, all primary and secondary study end points of SPARTAN were met; findings demonstrate the value of apalutamide as a treatment option for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Apalutamide increased overall survival and delayed time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy versus placebo in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prior analyses had demonstrated clinically impactful improvement in metastasis-free survival, time to symptomatic progression, and second progression-free survival with apalutamide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]