Search

Background: We evaluated the risk factors for pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and elevated depressive symptoms among patients undergoing high-grade cartilage defect surgery. We hypothesized that cartilage patients would demonstrate high scores on pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and depression testing prior to surgery., Methods: Two hundred and ten patients undergoing surgery for high-grade cartilage defects (56% chondroplasty, 36% microfracture, 22% autologous chondrocyte implantation) completed a preoperative survey before undergoing surgery. Outcome scores assessed were: International Knee Documentation Committee-Symptom (IKDC-S) score, Tegner activity score, Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), Tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK-11), and Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-9). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine what pre-operative factors predicted pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and elevated depressive symptoms., Results: The mean pre-operative Tegner score was 5.8 (SD 2.4) and IKDC-S score was 44.7 (SD 11.1). Prior to surgery, 19% had abnormal pain catastrophizing (PCS ≥ 20 points), 14.4% had moderate-severe depression (PHQ ≥ 10), and 49.0% had high kinesiophobia (TSK-11 ≥ 25). Lower pre-operative Tegner scores predicted moderate-severe depressive symptoms (per point decrease, OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06, 1.76; p = 0.008). Predictors of elevated pain catastrophizing were lower pre-operative IKDC-S scores (per 5-point decrease, OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08, 1.51; p = 0.002) and symptom duration >6 months (OR 2.20 CI 1.14, 4.32; p = 0.02). A lower pre-operative IKDC-S score (per 5-point decrease, OR 1.17, CI 1.03, 1.33; p = 0.02) predicted elevated kinesiophobia., Conclusion: Low self-reported function, low activity level and symptom duration greater than six months are associated with poor preoperative psychological status., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess potential risk factors, including time delay until implantation, for knee cartilage defect expansion or new high-grade defect formation between biopsy and Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) or Matrix Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI)., Study Design: Consecutive knee ACI and MACI cases by a single surgeon ( n = 111) were reviewed. The relationship between time between biopsy and staged implantation and (1) progression in primary cartilage defect size and (2) development of a new high-grade (Outerbridge grade ≥3) cartilage defect were determined with adjustment for demographics, body mass index, smoking status, coronal alignment, initial cartilage status, and prior surgery., Results: Average size of the primary defect at time of biopsy was 4.50 cm 2 . Mean time to chondrocyte implantation was 155 days. Defect expansion increased 0.11 cm 2 (standard error = 0.03) per month delay to implantation ( P = 0.001). Independent predictors of defect expansion were male sex, smaller initial defect size, and delay to implantation (adjusted mean = 0.15 cm 2 expansion per month). A total of 16.2% of patients ( n = 18/111) developed a new high-grade defect. Independent predictors of a new secondary defect were Outerbridge grade 2 changes (vs. 0-1) on the surface opposing the index defect and delayed implantation (per month increase, adjusted odds ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.44; P = 0.036)., Conclusions: Patients undergoing 2-stage cell-based cartilage restoration with either ACI or MACI demonstrated long delays between stages of surgery, placing them at risk for expanding defects and development of new high-grade cartilage defects. Patients who were male, had smaller initial defect size, and longer time between surgeries were at greater risk for defect expansion., Level of Evidence: III, retrospective comparative study.

Objective: To determine whether there are differences in symptomatic knee cartilage defects and rates of tobacco use among age-matched athletes versus nonathletes undergoing initial arthroscopic knee surgery who meet demographic and radiographic criteria for cartilage restoration surgery., Design: Age-matched athletes ( n = 186) and nonathletes ( n = 159) age 40 or less with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m 2 or less (mean 26.8 SD 4.1) and <50% joint space narrowing on weight-bearing radiographs were included. All patients had a symptomatic Outerbridge grade 2 or higher cartilage defect visualized during knee arthroscopy. Relationship between athletic status and chronicity of knee symptoms prior to surgery and tobacco use status, cartilage defect Outerbridge grade, size, and location at time of surgery were characterized., Results: Nonathletes were more likely to smoke ( P < 0.001) and had higher BMI ( P = 0.005). Duration of symptoms prior to surgery was shorter among athletes ( P < 0.001). Grade 4 defects were equally prevalent ( P = 0.96) as were multicompartment grade 3-4 lesions ( P = 0.12). Mean grade 3-4 defect size was similar in lateral ( P = 0.96) and medial compartments ( P = 0.82). There was a trend toward larger anterior compartment defects in nonathletes ( P = 0.07)., Conclusions: Among age-matched athletes and nonathletes with symptomatic cartilage defects who meet demographic criteria for cartilage restoration, nonathletes were more likely to smoke and have a longer duration of symptoms prior to treatment. Athletes tended to present earlier but with similar size defects compared to nonathletes, supporting accelerated treatment of defects in athletes and caution toward allowing continued athletic participation in patients with known cartilage defects.

Objective: To determine whether there are differences by sport or competitive level in symptomatic knee cartilage defects among recreational, high school, or collegiate competitive athletes undergoing initial arthroscopic knee surgery who meet criteria for cartilage restoration surgery., Design: Three hundred recreational ( n = 172) and high school or collegiate competitive athletes ( n = 128) younger than 40 years and body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m 2 (63% male, mean age 24.3 years, SD 7.1; mean BMI 25.7 kg/m 2 , SD 3.7) with Outerbridge grade 2 or higher symptomatic cartilage defects who underwent arthroscopic knee surgery were identified. The independent relationship between sporting activity or competitive level and cartilage defect location, size, severity, and symptom chronicity were assessed by multivariate regression analysis., Results: Full-thickness defects were present in 24% of competitive athletes and 31% of recreational athletes ( P = 0.21). There was a trend toward an independent association with competitive level and high-grade (3 or 4) multicompartment disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.99, 95% confidence interval 0.84-18.8; P = 0.08) or isolated anterior compartment defects (aOR 2.00, 95% CI 0.86-4.62, P = 0.10) but not isolated medial or lateral defects. High-grade defect size was similar among recreational and competitive athletes ( P = 0.71). High-grade lateral defect prevalence differed by sport (running 24%, basketball 23%, soccer 18%, football 5%; P = 0.02) but not medial or anterior defect prevalence., Conclusions: Among recreational and high school or collegiate competitive athletes with symptomatic cartilage defects who meet criteria for cartilage restoration, competitive athletes may have higher risk of high-grade anterior and multicompartment defects but no difference in defect size.

Purpose: To determine whether articular cartilage damage noted at the time of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) affects the likelihood of achieving ≥ 90% symmetry for isokinetic extension strength at 6 months after surgery or risk of recurrent ACL injury., Methods: Five hundred and eight patients underwent primary ACLR and diagnostic arthroscopy. All identified cartilage lesions were graded using the Outerbridge system. All patients underwent isokinetic strength testing. The association between cartilage Outerbridge grade and a ≥ 90% Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) and recurrent ACL injury risk at mean 38.7 month follow-up (SD 31.8) was evaluated via multivariate regression analysis., Results: Grade 2 or higher damage was present in 394 (77.5%) of patients, grade 3 or higher in 143 (28.1%) and grade 4 in 83 (16.4%) at time of ACLR. Ipsilateral ACLR graft rupture occurred in 31 (6.1%) of patients. Contralateral ACL injury occurred in 19 (3.7%). Patients with grade 2 or higher damage were significantly less likely to meet an LSI goal of ≥ 90% for fast (300°/s) isokinetic extension. There was no association with slow isokinetic extension. Cartilage lesion severity at or beyond grade 2 had a similar effect on isokinetic testing results regardless of compartment involvement or performance of microfracture. Patients with grade 2-4 cartilage damage were less likely to sustain a second ipsilateral ACL injury or a contralateral native ACL injury., Conclusions: Cartilage damage seen at time of ACL reconstruction is common and associated with lower likelihood of achieving ≥ 90% symmetry for isokinetic extension strength at 6 months after surgery. However, lower recurrent ACL injury rates are seen in patients with concurrent cartilage damage. These data may inform future clinical decisions regarding operative managment of recurrent ACL injuries., Level of Evidence: III.

Background: Cartilage lesions of the knee are difficult to treat. Lesion size is a critical factor in treatment algorithms, and the accurate, reproducible sizing of lesions is important. In this study, we evaluated the interrater and intrarater reliability of, and correlations in relation to, various arthroscopic sizing techniques., Methods: Five lesions were created in each of 10 cadaveric knees (International Cartilage Repair Society grade 3C). Three orthopaedic surgeons used 4 techniques (visualization and use of a 3-mm probe, a simple metal ruler, and a sliding metallic ruler tool) to estimate lesion size. Repeated-measures data were analyzed using a mixed-effect linear model. The differences between observed and gold-standard (plastic mold) values were used as the response. Intraclass and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values for intrarater and interrater reliability were computed, as were overall correlation coefficients between measurements and gold standards., Results: The mean lesion size was 2.37 cm (range, 0.36 to 6.02 cm). Rater, lesion location and size, and measurement method all affected the cartilage defect measurements. Surgeons underestimated lesion size, and measurements of larger lesions had a higher percentage of error compared with those of smaller lesions. When compared with plastic molds of lesions, 60.5% of surgeon measurements underestimated lesion size. Overall, the correlation between measurements and gold standards was strongest for the simple metal ruler method and weakest for the visualization method., Conclusions: Several factors may influence arthroscopic estimation of cartilage lesion size: the lesion location, measurement tool, surgeon, and defect size itself. The intrarater and interrater reliability was moderate to good using a 3-mm probe, sliding metallic ruler tool, or simple metal ruler and was fair to moderate using visualization only., Clinical Relevance: There is a need for more accurate methods of determining the size of articular cartilage lesions.