Search

Background and Purpose: Internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms may present with cranial nerve dysfunction. Therapeutic ICA occlusion, when tolerated, is an effective treatment resulting in improvement or cure of symptoms in most patients. When ICA occlusion is not tolerated, selective endovascular aneurysm occlusion can be considered. We compare recovery of cranial nerve dysfunction in patients treated with selective coil occlusion and with therapeutic ICA occlusion., Materials and Methods: In 16 patients with 17 large or giant (11-45 mm) unruptured ICA aneurysms presenting with dysfunction of cranial nerves (CN) II, III, IV, or VI, selective coil occlusion was performed. From a cohort of 39 patients with ICA aneurysms treated with ICA occlusion and long-term follow-up, we selected 31 patients with aneurysms presenting with cranial nerve dysfunction. Clinical recovery at follow-up from oculomotor dysfunction and visual symptoms was compared for both treatment modalities., Results: Of 17 aneurysms treated with selective coiling, symptoms of cranial nerve dysfunction resolved in 3, improved in 10, and remained unchanged in 4. In 9 of 17 patients, additional coiling during follow-up was required. Of 31 aneurysms treated with carotid artery occlusion, cranial nerve dysfunction resolved in 19, improved in 9, and remained unchanged in 3. These differences were not significant. There were no complications of treatment., Conclusion: Recovery of ICA aneurysm-induced cranial nerve dysfunction occurs in most patients, both after ICA occlusion and after selective coiling. In patients who cannot tolerate ICA occlusion, selective aneurysmal occlusion with coils is a valuable alternative.

Objective: Several studies have reported on approaches to increase exposure of the distal cervical internal carotid artery (ICA), but these studies have neither systematically addressed the anatomic aspects nor quantified the additional exposure of each maneuver. We describe surgical steps to expose the ICA region, quantify the additional exposure of each operative step, and discuss ways to minimize surgical morbidity., Methods: The ICA was exposed in 10 formalin-fixed cadaveric heads using the following four steps: 1) anterior sternocleidomastoid approach, 2) retroparotid dissection and division of the digastric muscle, 3) section of the styloid apparatus, and 4) mandibulotomy. After completion of each step, the most distal level of ICA exposure was marked with a hemoclip and segment lengths were measured between each clip., Results: Sectioning of the digastric muscle and sectioning of the styloid apparatus provided the most significant exposure of the ICA (14.15 and 15.08 mm, respectively) with minimal risks. Mandibulotomy added 10.20 mm in length and 20.65 degrees in width, but is a maneuver that must be weighed against the heightened risk of morbidity., Conclusion: Surgical exposure of the distal cervical ICA is associated with relatively high morbidity that increases with higher levels of exposure. Staged maneuvers have been shown to increase ICA exposure, especially in our systematic approach. The number of steps required varies depending on the level of lesion. Complete understanding of the surgical anatomy is essential to minimize surgical morbidity and to develop surgical expertise.