Search

Purpose: Caregivers, or proxies, often complete patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on behalf of patients with stroke. The objective of our study was to assess the validity and responsiveness of proxy-responses compared to patient-responses across multiple domains of health., Methods: Stroke patients and their proxies were recruited to complete PROMs between 7/2018-11/2019. PROMs included Neuro-QoL cognitive function, PROMIS physical function, satisfaction with social roles, anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance, Global Health, and PHQ-9. Internal consistency and convergent validity were compared between patient- and proxy-reported measures. Known-groups validity was assessed across levels of stroke disability. Internal responsiveness was evaluated using paired t-tests for a subset of patients who attended rehabilitation following stroke. Analyses were stratified by patients ≤ 3 vs > 3 months from stroke., Results: This cross-sectional study included 200 stroke patients (age 62.2 ± 13.3, 41.5% female) and their proxies (age 56.5 ± 13.9, 70% female, 72% spouses). PROMs had high internal consistency and were significantly correlated for patients and proxies. Patient- and proxy-reported measures worsened with increasing stroke disability. For 34 (17%) patients who attended rehabilitation, patients self-reported improvement on 5 domains whereas proxies reported no improvement. Compared to patient self-reports, validity was worse for proxy-reports on patients ≤ 3 months but better > 3 months from stroke., Conclusions: Both patient- and proxy-reported PROMs demonstrated strong validity. Only patient-reported PROMs were responsive to change, and proxies had worse validity for patients ≤ 3 months from stroke but better validity for patients > 3 months from stroke. These findings justify the utilization of proxy responses in stroke patients > 3 months from stroke.

Objectives: To quantify the extent and variability of bias introduced when caregivers, or proxies, complete patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) on behalf of stroke patients., Design: Cross-sectional survey study conducted between July 2018 and November 2019., Setting: Ambulatory clinic of a cerebrovascular center or rehabilitation unit., Participants: A consecutive sample of stroke patients (N=200) and their proxies who were able and willing to complete PROMs. Proxies completed PROMs as they believed the patient would answer., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: PROMs included Neuro-QoL cognitive function, PROMIS physical function, social role satisfaction, anxiety, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 translated to PROMIS Depression, and PROMIS Global Health., Results: The study included 200 stroke patients (age, 62.2±13.3; 41.5% women) and their proxies (age 56.5±13.9; 70% women, 72% spouses). Proxies reported worse functioning and more symptoms across all PROM domains compared with patients (average difference, 0.3-3.0 T score points). Reliability between dyad responses was moderate across all domains (intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1), 0.49-0.76) and effect sizes were small (d=0.04-0.35). Cognitive function, anxiety, and depression had the lowest agreement, whereas physical function, pain, and sleep had the highest agreement based on the Bland-Altman method. At the individual level, a large proportion of dyads had meaningfully different scores across domains (range, 40%-57%; dyads differed >5 T score points). Few predictors of disagreement were identified through multinomial regression models., Conclusions: At the aggregate level, small differences were detected between stroke patient-proxy pairs, with lower agreement on more subjective domains. At the individual level, a large proportion of dyads reported meaningfully different scores on all domains, affecting the interpretability of proxy responses on PROMs in a clinical setting., (Copyright © 2020 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)