Search

Objective: The aim of this study was to measure the impact of different risk factors in middle-aged women on longevity evaluated after three decades of an initial health screening., Methods: Women who received an annual check-up between 1990 and 1993 were recruited. Anamnesis and physical examination were recorded. Blood samples for the measurement of glycemia and lipids were taken. Data are reported as of December 2021., Results: A total of 1,158 women aged 40 to 60 were studied. At 30.9 years of follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier overall survival was 75.6% (95% confidence interval, 72.6-78.3). The main causes of the 260 deaths observed were the following: cancer ( n = 88; 33.8%), cardiovascular disease ( n = 55; 21.2%), and infectious disease ( n = 41; 15.8%). The following hazard ratios were found with the flexible parametric survival model: personal history of fracture (hazard ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-5.02; P = 0.007), type 2 diabetes mellitus (2.14; 1.18-3.88; P = 0.012), personal history of heart disease (1.85; 1.09-3.13; P = 0.022), chronic arterial hypertension (1.65; 1.25-2.17; P < 0.001), postmenopausal status (1.60; 1.13-2.26; P = 0.008), unskilled jobs (1.56; 1.17-2.07; P = 0.002), cigarette smoking (1.51; 1.17-1.94; P = 0.002), age (1.06; 1.03-1.09; P < 0.001), body mass index (1.04; 1.01-1.07; P = 0.004), multiparous (0.72; 0.56-0.93; P = 0.012), and active sexual intercourse (0.68; 0.52-0.87; P = 0.003). Lipid disorders did not reach statistical significance as a risk factor., Conclusions: In this cohort, it was observed that most of the classic risk factors for mortality were present. However, a history of fracture appears in middle-aged women as a strong predictor of mortality, surpassing diabetes and arterial hypertension. Multiparity, on the other hand, was a protective factor., Competing Interests: Financial disclosure/conflicts of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest and are alone responsible for the writing and content of this document., (Copyright © 2022 by The North American Menopause Society.)

The hormonal deficit of post menopause is not only linked to the classic hot flashes, but also to a higher risk of chronic diseases. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) adequately treats climacteric symptoms and can prevent some chronic diseases such as osteoporosis. The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study, which indicated risks of MHT in elderly postmenopausal women, caused a massive withdrawal of this therapy. But, in recent years the results of the WHI have been challenged by methodological problems and by several studies indicating that, if MHT is initiated early and the non-oral route is preferred, the risks could be minimized and it could improve not only the quality of life but also reduce the risk of chronic diseases. However, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends against the use of MHT for the prevention of chronic diseases, a position that has been challenged by publications of the North American Menopause Society and the International Menopause Society. This controversy persists so far. We report data that suggest a preventive role of MHT in perimenopausal women.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different risk factors on long-term mortality in middle-aged women., Methods: Women who received preventive health care control between 1990 and 1993 were recruited. Anamnesis and physical examination were recorded. Blood samples for the measurement of glycemia and lipids were taken. Data are reported as of December 2017., Results: We studied 1197 women aged between 40 and 60 years. We observed 183 deaths (survival 84.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 81.7-86.1, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis). The main causes of death were cancer (39.9%; 95% CI, 32.7-47.1), cardiovascular disease (22.9%; 95% CI, 16.8-29.1), infectious disease (13.7%; 95% CI, 8.6-18.7), other causes (7.1%, 95% CI, 3.4-10.9), and unspecified cause (6.6%; 95% CI, 2.9-10.2). The final Cox regression model showed the following hazard ratios for mortality: diabetes mellitus 2.51 (95% CI, 1.40-4.51), history of fracture 2.47 (95% CI, 1.15-5.30), history of heart illness 2.06 (95% CI, 1.15-3.72), arterial hypertension 1.51 (95% CI, 1.08-2.11), age 1.07 (95% CI, 1.04-1.10), body mass index 1.06 (95% CI, 1.02-1.09), and sexual intercourse 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98). Lipid disorders did not reach statistical significance as a risk factor., Conclusion: Diabetes, a history of fractures, and cardiovascular risk factors, except lipids, are markers of long-term mortality in middle-aged women. Physicians should pay special attention to these risk factors.

The health of many women is affected in the climacteric period, either by symptoms that deteriorate their life quality (QL) or by chronic diseases that affect their life expectancy. Therefore, it is mandatory to evaluate these two aspects, having as core objectives for any eventual therapeutic intervention, the improvement of QL and the reduction of cardiovascular risk and fractures. To evaluate QL it is mandatory to follow structured interviews that weigh systematically climacteric symptoms such as the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). The paradigm of the metabolic syndrome constitutes a suitable frame to evaluate cardiovascular risk. Age, a low body weight, a history of fractures and steroid use are risk factors for fractures. A proper evaluation will allow the detection of patients with a low QL or a high risk for chronic disease, therefore identifying those women who require therapy. The clinical management should include recommendations to improve lifestyles, increase physical activity, avoidance of smoking and to follow a low calorie diet rich in vegetables and fruits. Hormonal therapy is the most efficient treatment to improve the QL and its risk is minimized when it is used in low doses or by the transdermal route. Tibolone is an alternative, especially useful in patients with mood disorders and sexual dysfunction. Vaginal estrogens are also a good option, when urogenital symptoms are the main complaint. Some antidepressants can be an effective therapy in patients with vasomotor symptoms who are not willing or cannot use estrogens. The effectiveness of any alternative therapy for menopausal symptoms has not been demonstrated. Dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity and insulin resistance should be managed according to guidelines. Calcium and vitamin D have positive effects on bone density and certain tendency to reduce vertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates decrease the risk of vertebral fractures.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of obesity and other cardiovascular risk factors (RF) in middle-aged women, to correlate them with each other, and to describe the prevalence of such a RF and their changes with aging, menopause and Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) in a cohort of Chilean workers., Material and Method: In 1991-1992 cardiovascular RFs were assessed in 467 women between 40 and 59 who were not taking HRT at that time. Five years later these women were re-evaluated., Results: Sedentarism (87.2%), dyslipidemias (71.5%), high blood pressure (13.5%), obesity (13.1%), smoking (12.4%) and diabetes (2.8%) were the more prevalent RF. These RF become more prevalent with age. In the second control, 5 years later, hypertension (20.9%), obesity (27.3%), smoking (20.8%) and diabetes (5.9%) were observed increased. Dyslipidemia did not changed, although triglyceride levels rose from 125.9+/-56.4 to 136.8+/-63.5 mg/dl (P<0.01). Sedentarism dropped to 58.8%. Menopause did not deteriorate any of these RF. The use of HRT increased during the 5-years follow-up from 3.8 to 35%, and related to its use a decrease in LDL-cholesterol and an increase in HDL-cholesterol levels were detected., Conclusion: Middle-aged women included in this cohort have a high prevalence of RF; these deteriorate with age, but no with menopause. HRT improves the lipid profile.

Background: It is generally accepted that menopause significantly modifies cardiovascular risk. The effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on this risk remain controversial., Aim: To study the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (RF) in middle-aged women and their changes with aging, menopause and hormone replacement therapy (HRT)., Material and Methods: Cardiovascular risk factors were assessed in 576 women aged 40 to 59 years in 1991-92. Five years later, 467 of these women were reassessed., Results: Sedentarism (87.2%), dyslipidemias (71.5%), high blood pressure (13.5%), obesity (13.1%), smoking (12.4%) and diabetes (2.8%) were the most prevalent RF. Five years later, the prevalence of hypertension increased to 20.9%, the prevalence of obesity increased to 27.3%, smoking increased to 20.8% and diabetes to 5.9%. The prevalence of dyslipidemia did not change, although triglycerides levels rose from 125.9 +/- 56.4 to 136.8 +/- 63.5 mg/dl (p < 0.001). Sedentarism dropped to 58.8%. Menopause did not deteriorate any of these RF. The use of HRT increased during the 5 years follow-up from 3.8% to 35%. Women on HRT experienced 3% decrease in LDL-cholesterol and 9% increase in HDL-cholesterol levels., Conclusions: Middle aged women included in this cohort have a high prevalence of RF. There is a deterioration with age, but not with menopause. HRT improves the lipid profile.

Objective: To evaluate the influence of menopause and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on weight and the effect of weight gain on coronary risk factors., Design: From 1991 to 1992 cardiovascular risk factors were assessed in 271 premenopausal women between the ages of 40 and 53 years. The women were not receiving HRT at that time. Five years later, these women were reevaluated., Results: Weight and body mass index (BMI) increased steadily with age. During the observation period there was an average increase of 4.0 kg +/- 4.6 (p < 0.0001). Women who experienced menopause and those who did not experience menopause had a similar weight increase (3.8 +/- 4.4 kg vs. 4.3 +/- 4.8, p = 0.37). Likewise, weight gain was similar in those who did or did not use HRT (nonusers, 4.3 +/- 4.6 kg; users, 3.5 +/- 3.7 kg; ex-users, 3.4 +/- 5.8 kg). At their first checkups, overweight women and obese women already had significant differences in their risk factors, including higher systolic pressure (p < 0.02), diastolic pressure (p < 0.01), glucose (p < 0.02) and triglycerides (p < 0.0001), and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.004) as compared with women of normal weight. Unexpectedly, women of normal weight who became overweight or obese during the monitoring period did not show any deterioration in their risk factors., Conclusions: During the perimenopausal period there is a weight gain that does not seem to depend on the menopause or HRT. Being overweight or obese during the menopausal transition is not necessarily associated with deterioration in coronary risk factors. This seems to imply the existence of different metabolic populations within this group of women.

Background: Several studies have suggested that women who choose to use hormone replacement therapy (HRT) already, before starting this therapy, have a better cardiovascular risk profile than those who do not use it. Some of these studies contain factors of confusion and biases, such as HRT users' greater educational achievement or physical activity, which could have led to wrong conclusions., Aim: To study a cohort, without confounding factors in order to analyse whether the cardiovascular risk profile is different in women who choose to use HRT., Material and Methods: Coronary risk factors of 387 women between 45 and 64 were studied. This study was carried out at the Unit for the Preventive Medical Examination of the South Metropolitan Health Service in Santiago (Chile) during the annual check-up. The first evaluation was in 1991-1992; with a second evaluation 5 years later. Of all the women, 174 (45%) never received hormones (Group A), 124 (32%) were HRT users at the time (Group B), and 89 (23%) were former-users (Group C)., Results: No differences were found between the three groups for age, body mass index (BMI), educational background, alcohol consumption, smoking or physical activity. Blood pressure was similar in the three groups. No significant differences were found in total cholesterol (A, 221.7+/-42.2; B, 228.2+/-47.0; and C, 227.3+/-44.9 mg/dl); high density lipoprotein (HDL, A, 53.5+/-13.2; B, 51.8+/-12.8; and C, 54.0+/-12.4 mg/dl); low density lipoprotein (LDL, A, 141.7+/-38.9; B, 148.5+/-43.1 and C, 148.3+/-43.8 mg/dl); triglycerides (A, 134.5+/-67.9; B, 141.0+/-66.1; and C, 127.3+/-68.5 mg/dl) and glucose plasma levels (A, 90.5+/-32.2; B, 87.7+/-15.3; and C, 85.0+/-8.8 mg/dl)., Conclusions: Our results suggest that women who choose to use HRT have a cardiovascular risk profile, before starting the therapy, similar to those who do not use it.

Transdermic estrogens share many of the oral estrogens cardiovascular effects, but so far there are no studies proving that they have a cardioprotective effect neither in animals nor in human beings. The doubt is outlined moreover, when most of the investigations performed with oral estrogens in animals show an antiatherogenic effect, while the few experimental studies that hare been carried out with estrogen patches show contradictory results. We will have to wait for more extensive clinical trials to be able to know if the transdermic estrogens are really cardioprotective, however if we want to achieve some cardiovascular risk improvement with the current knowledge we will probably have to support the use of oral estrogens.