Search

In this perspective, we discuss new evidence relating to current dietary recommendations to reduce SFA intake to modulate an individual's global risk of CVD. Although it is well established that lowering dietary SFA intake has a beneficial effect on LDL cholesterol concentrations, findings increasingly indicate an opposite effect on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations. In recent years, many studies have firmly established a role for an elevated Lp(a) concentration as a genetically regulated, causal, and prevalent risk factor for CVD. However, there is less awareness of the effect of dietary SFA intake on Lp(a) concentrations. This study discusses this issue and highlights the contrasting effect of reducing dietary SFA intake on LDL cholesterol and Lp(a), 2 highly atherogenic lipoproteins. This calls attention to the need for precision nutrition approaches that move beyond a "one-size-fits-all" approach. To illustrate the contrast, we describe the dynamic contributions of Lp(a) and LDL cholesterol concentrations to CVD risk during interventions with a low-SFA diet, with the hope that this will stimulate further studies and discussions regarding dietary management of CVD risk., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In 2022, the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) published a new consensus statement on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], summarizing current knowledge about its causal association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic stenosis. One of the novelties of this statement is a new risk calculator showing how Lp(a) influences lifetime risk for ASCVD and that global risk may be underestimated substantially in individuals with high or very high Lp(a) concentration. The statement also provides practical advice on how knowledge about Lp(a) concentration can be used to modulate risk factor management, given that specific and highly effective mRNA-targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are still in clinical development. This advice counters the attitude: "Why should I measure Lp(a) if I can't lower it?". Subsequent to publication, questions have arisen relating to how the recommendations of this statement impact everyday clinical practice and ASCVD management. This review addresses 30 of the most frequently asked questions about Lp(a) epidemiology, its contribution to cardiovascular risk, Lp(a) measurement, risk factor management and existing therapeutic options., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Potential conflicts of interest outside the submitted work are summarized below. The following authors report participation in trials; receipt of fellowships, or grants for travel, research or staffing support; and/or personal honoraria for consultancy or lectures/speaker’s bureau from: Abbott (KKR, LST, BG Nordestgaard [BGN]), Abcentra (M Koschinsky [MK]), Abdi-Ibrahim (LST), Actelion (LST), Aegerion (ALC, PM Moriarty [PMM]), Affiris AG (G Lambert [GL]), Akcea (ALC, BGN, KG Parhofer [KGP], ESGS), Amarin (ALC, PMM, BGN, KGP), Amgen (ALC, BA Ference [BAF], F Kronenberg [FK], F Mach [FM], PMM, P Natarajan [PN], BGN, KGP, KKR, ESGS, LST, GF Watts [GFW]), Amgen Germany (A von Eckardstein [AvE]), Amgen Switzerland (AvE), Amryt (ALC), Amundsen/Amgen (FM), Apple (PN), Arrowhead (GFW), Ayma Therapeutics (MK), AstraZeneca (ALC, PN, BGN, KKR, GFW), Bayer (LST), Berlin-Chemie (KGP), Boehringer-Ingelheim (KKR), Boston Scientific (PN), CiVi Pharma (BAF), Daiichi-Sankyo (ALC, BAF, FM, KGP, KKR, LST), Daiichi Switzerland (AvE), dalCOR (BAF), Denka (BGN), Eli Lilly (ALC, BAF, MK, KKR), Esperion (ALC, BAF, PMM, BGN, KKR, ESGS, GFW), FH Foundation (PMM), Foresite Labs (PN), Fresenius (FK), GB Life Sciences (PMM), Genentech (PN), Genzyme (ALC), Horizon/Novartis (FM, BGN), Ionis Pharmaceuticals (BA, ALC, BAF, BGN, MK, PMM), Jupiter Bioventures (MR Dweck [MRD]), Kaneka (FK, PMM), Kowa (ALC, BGN, KKR), KrKa Phama (BAF), Lupin (KKR), Menarini (ALC), Merck (ALC, BAF), MSD (KGP), Mylan (ALC, BAF, LST), New Amsterdam (KKR), Noetic Insights (MK), Novartis (B Arsenault [BA], ALC, MRD, BAF, FK, FM, CJ McNeal [CJMN], PMM, PN, BGN, KGP, KKR, ESGS, LST, GFW), Novartis Canada (MK), NovoNordisk (BAF, CJMN, BGN, KKR, ES, LST), Nyrada Inc (GL), Pfizer (BA, MRD, BAF, MK,SM, KKR, LST, GFW), Quest Diagnostics (SM), Recordati (ALC, LST), Regeneron (ALC, BAF, PMM, BGN, KKR, ESGS), Renew (PMM), Resverlogix (KKR), Sandoz (ALC), Sanofi (ALC, BAF, FM, BGN, KGP, KKR, ESGS, LST, GFW), Sanofi-Aventis Switzerland (AvE), Sanofi-Regeneron (GL, ESGS), Servier (LST), Sigma Tau (ALC), Silence Therapeutics (BA, MRD, BAF, BGN, KKR, GFW), The Medicines Co (BAF) and UltraGenyx (BGN). PN declares spousal employment at Vertex and KGP is a member of the Data Monitoring and Safety Board at Boehringer-Ingelheim. SSV declares an honorarium from the American College of Cardiology (Associate Editor for Innovations, acc.org), and grant funding from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health, World Heart Federation, and Tahir and Jooma Family. Manuscripts have been published in collaboration with non-academic co-authors by PN and LST (Fitbit), GFW (Amgen), and BA (Pfizer). Equity interests including income from stocks, stock options, royalties, or from patents or copyrights were reported from AstraZeneca (JKS), Boston Scientific (L Berglund [LB]), Cargene Therapeutics (KKR), Gilead Sciences (LB), J & J (LB), GSK (JKS), Medtronic (LB), New Amsterdam Pharma (KKR), NovoNordisk (LB), Pemi31 Therapeutics (KKR), and Pfizer (LB).KKR is President of the European Atherosclerosis Society. LST is Past-President of the European Atherosclerosis Society and an Editorial Board Member, The European Heart Journal., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This 2022 European Atherosclerosis Society lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] consensus statement updates evidence for the role of Lp(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve stenosis, provides clinical guidance for testing and treating elevated Lp(a) levels, and considers its inclusion in global risk estimation. Epidemiologic and genetic studies involving hundreds of thousands of individuals strongly support a causal and continuous association between Lp(a) concentration and cardiovascular outcomes in different ethnicities; elevated Lp(a) is a risk factor even at very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. High Lp(a) is associated with both microcalcification and macrocalcification of the aortic valve. Current findings do not support Lp(a) as a risk factor for venous thrombotic events and impaired fibrinolysis. Very low Lp(a) levels may associate with increased risk of diabetes mellitus meriting further study. Lp(a) has pro-inflammatory and pro-atherosclerotic properties, which may partly relate to the oxidized phospholipids carried by Lp(a). This panel recommends testing Lp(a) concentration at least once in adults; cascade testing has potential value in familial hypercholesterolaemia, or with family or personal history of (very) high Lp(a) or premature ASCVD. Without specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies, early intensive risk factor management is recommended, targeted according to global cardiovascular risk and Lp(a) level. Lipoprotein apheresis is an option for very high Lp(a) with progressive cardiovascular disease despite optimal management of risk factors. In conclusion, this statement reinforces evidence for Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes. Trials of specific Lp(a)-lowering treatments are critical to confirm clinical benefit for cardiovascular disease and aortic valve stenosis., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Potential conflicts of interest outside the submitted work are summarized as follows. The following authors report participation in trials; receipt of fellowships, or grants for travel, research or staffing support; and/or personal honoraria for consultancy or lectures/speaker’s bureau from: Abbott (K.K.R., L.S.T.), Abcentra (M.K.), Abdi-Ibrahim (L.S.T.), Actelion (L.S.T.), Aegerion (A.L.C., P.M.M.), Affiris AG (G.L.), Akcea (A.L.C., B.G.N., K.G.P., E.S.G.S.), Amarin (A.L.C., P.M.M., B.G.N., K.G.P.), Amgen (A.L.C., B.A.F., F.K., F.M., P.M.M., P.N., B.G.N., K.G.P., K.K.R., E.S.GS., L.S.T., G.F.W.), Amgen Germany (A.v.E.), Amgen Switzerland (A.v.E.), Amryt (A.L.C.), Amundsen/Amgen (F.M.), Apple (P.N.), Arrowhead (G.F.W.), Ayma Therapeutics (M.K.), AstraZeneca (A.L.C., P.N., B.G.N., K.K.R., G.F.W.), Bayer (L.S.T.), Berlin-Chemie (K.G.P.), Boehringer-Ingelheim (K.K.R.), Boston Scientific (P.N.), CiVi Pharma (B.A.F.), Daiichi-Sankyo (A.L.C., B.A.F., F.M., K.G.P., K.K.R., L.S.T.), Daiichi Switzerland (A.v.E.), dalCOR (B.A.F.), Denka (B.G.N.), Eli Lilly (A.L.C., B.A.F., M.K., K.K.R.), Esperion (A.L.C., B.A.F., P.M.M., B.G.N., K.K.R., E.S.G.S., G.F.W.), FH Foundation (P.M.M.), Foresite Labs (P.N.), Fresenius (F.K.), GB Life Sciences (P.M.M.), Genentech (P.N.), Genzyme (A.L.C.), Horizon/Novartis (F.M., B.G.N.), Ionis Pharmaceuticals (B.A., A.L.C., B.A.F., M.K., P.M.M.), Jupiter Bioventures (M.R.D.), Kaneka (F.K., P.M.M.), Kowa (A.L.C., B.G.N., K.K.R.), KrKa Phama (B.A.F.), Lupin (K.K.R.), Menarini (A.L.C.), Merck (A.L.C., B.A.F.), MSD (K.G.P.), Mylan (A.L.C., B.A.F., L.S.T.), New Amsterdam (K.K.R.), Noetic Insights (M.K.), Novartis (B.A., A.L.C., M.R.D., B.A.F., F.K., F.M., C.J.M.N., P.M.M., P.N., B.G.N., K.G.P., K.K.R., E.S.G.S., L.S.T., G.F.W.), Novartis Canada (M.K.), NovoNordisk (B.A.F., C.J.M.N., B.G.N., K.K.R., E.S., L.S.T.), Nyrada Inc (G.L.), Pfizer (B.A., M.R.D., B.A.F., M.K., S.M., K.K.R., L.S.T., G.F.W.), Quest Diagnostics (S.M.), Recordati (A.L.C., LS.T.), Regeneron (A.L.C., B.A.F., P.M.M., B.G.N., K.K.R., E.S.G.S.), Renew (P.M.M.), Resverlogix (K.K.R.), Sandoz (A.L.C.), Sanofi (A.L.C., B.A.F., F.M., B.G.N., K.G.P., K.K.R., E.S.G.S., L.S.T., G.F.W.), Sanofi-Aventis Switzerland (A.v.E.), Sanofi-Regeneron (G.L., E.S.G.S.), Servier (L.S.T.), Sigma Tau (A.L.C.), Silence Therapeutics (B.A., M.R.D., B.A.F., B.G.N., K.K.R., G.F.W.), and The Medicines Co (B.A.F.). P.N. declares spousal employment at Vertex and K.G.P. is a member of the Data Monitoring and Safety Board at Boehringer-Ingelheim. S.S.V. declares an honorarium from the American College of Cardiology (Associate Editor for Innovations, acc.org), and grant funding from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health, World Heart Federation, and Tahir and Jooma Family. Manuscripts have been published in collaboration with non-academic co-authors by P.N. and L.S.T. (Fitbit), G.F.W. (Amgen), and B.A. (Pfizer). Equity interests including income from stocks, stock options, royalties, or from patents or copyrights were reported from AstraZeneca (J.K.S.), Boston Scientific (L.B.), Cargene Therapeutics (K.K.R.), Gilead Sciences (L.B)., J & J (L.B.), GSK (J.K.S.), Medtronic (L.B.), New Amsterdam Pharma (K.K.R.), NovoNordisk (L.B.), Pemi31 Therapeutics (K.K.R.), and Pfizer (L.B.). K.K.R. is President of the European Atherosclerosis Society. L.S.T. is past-president of the European Atherosclerosis Society and an Editorial Board Member, The European Heart Journal., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

An elevated level of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically regulated, independent, causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, the extensive variability in Lp(a) levels between individuals and population groups cannot be fully explained by genetic factors, emphasizing a potential role for non-genetic factors. In this review, we provide an overview of current evidence on non-genetic factors influencing Lp(a) levels with a particular focus on diet, physical activity, hormones and certain pathological conditions. Findings from randomized controlled clinical trials show that diets lower in saturated fats modestly influence Lp(a) levels and often in the opposing direction to LDL cholesterol. Results from studies on physical activity/exercise have been inconsistent, ranging from no to minimal or moderate change in Lp(a) levels, potentially modulated by age and the type, intensity, and duration of exercise modality. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women lowers Lp(a) levels with oral being more effective than transdermal estradiol; the type of HRT, dose of estrogen and addition of progestogen do not modify the Lp(a)-lowering effect of HRT. Kidney diseases result in marked elevations in Lp(a) levels, albeit dependent on disease stages, dialysis modalities and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes. In contrast, Lp(a) levels are reduced in liver diseases in parallel with the disease progression, although population studies have yielded conflicting results on the associations between Lp(a) levels and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Overall, current evidence supports a role for diet, hormones and related conditions, and liver and kidney diseases in modifying Lp(a) levels., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Factor VIIc, fibrinogen, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) are cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and are modulated, in part, by fat type and amount., Objective: We evaluated fat type and amount on the primary outcomes: factor VIIc, fibrinogen, and PAI-1., Methods: In the Dietary Effects on Lipoproteins and Thrombogenic Activity (DELTA) Trial, 2 controlled crossover feeding studies evaluated substituting carbohydrate or MUFAs for SFAs. Study 1: healthy participants (n = 103) were provided with (8 wk) an average American diet [AAD; designed to provide 37% of energy (%E) as fat, 16% SFA], a Step 1 diet (30%E fat, 9% SFA), and a diet low in SFA (Low-Sat; 26%E fat, 5% SFA). Study 2: participants (n = 85) at risk for CVD and metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) were provided with (7 wk) an AAD, a step 1 diet, and a high-MUFA diet (designed to provide 37%E fat, 8% SFA, 22% MUFA)., Results: Study 1: compared with AAD, the Step 1 and Low-Sat diets decreased mean factor VIIc by 1.8% and 2.6% (overall P = 0.0001), increased mean fibrinogen by 1.2% and 2.8% (P = 0.0141), and increased mean square root PAI-1 by 0.0% and 6.0% (P = 0.0037), respectively. Study 2: compared with AAD, the Step 1 and high-MUFA diets decreased mean factor VIIc by 4.1% and 3.2% (overall P < 0.0001), increased mean fibrinogen by 3.9% and 1.5% (P = 0.0083), and increased mean square-root PAI-1 by 2.0% and 5.8% (P = 0.1319), respectively., Conclusions: Replacing SFA with carbohydrate decreased factor VIIc and increased fibrinogen in healthy and metabolically unhealthy individuals and also increased PAI-1 in healthy subjects. Replacing SFA with MUFA decreased factor VIIc and increased fibrinogen but less than carbohydrate. Our results indicate an uncertain effect of replacing SFA with carbohydrate or MUFA on cardiometabolic risk because of small changes in hemostatic factors and directionally different responses to decreasing SFA. This trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00000538?term=NCT00000538&rank=1 as NCT00000538., (Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent, causal, genetically determined risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We provide an overview of current knowledge on Lp(a) and CVD risk, and the effect of pharmacological agents on Lp(a). Since evidence is accumulating that diet modulates Lp(a), the focus of this paper is on the effect of dietary intervention on Lp(a). We identified seven trials with 15 comparisons of the effect of saturated fat (SFA) replacement on Lp(a). While replacement of SFA with carbohydrate, monounsaturated fat (MUFA), or polyunsaturated fat (PUFA) consistently lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), heterogeneity in the Lp(a) response was observed. In two trials, Lp(a) increased with carbohydrate replacement; one trial showed no effect and another showed Lp(a) lowering. MUFA replacement increased Lp(a) in three trials; three trials showed no effect and one showed lowering. PUFA or PUFA + MUFA inconsistently affected Lp(a) in four trials. Seven trials of diets with differing macronutrient compositions showed similar divergence in the effect on LDL-C and Lp(a). The identified clinical trials show diet modestly affects Lp(a) and often in the opposing direction to LDL-C. Further research is needed to understand how diet affects Lp(a) and its properties, and the lack of concordance between diet-induced LDL-C and Lp(a) changes.

Background: Established cardiovascular risk markers, such as hypertension, are associated with increased risk of brain infarcts. The newer markers N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, troponin I, C-reactive protein, and cystatin C may affect the risk of cardiovascular events and potentially, thereby, also stroke. We investigated the association between established and new risk markers for cardiovascular disease and brain infarcts detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at age 75., Methods: Four hundred six randomly selected subjects from the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors study were examined with MRI of the brain at age 75. Blood samples, measurements, and dedicated questionnaires at age 70 were used for analysis of risk markers. A history of diseases had been obtained at age 70 and 75. MRI was evaluated regarding lacunar and cortical infarcts. Univariate associations between outcomes and risk markers were assessed with logistic regression models., Results: One or more infarcts were seen in 23% of the subjects (20% had only lacunar infarcts, 1% had only cortical infarcts, and 2% had both). Hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4, 4.7) and obesity (OR 1.3; CI 1.0, 1.8) were significantly associated with increased risk of brain infarction. The newer risk markers were not significantly associated with the brain infarcts., Conclusions: The new markers were not associated with the predominantly lacunar infarcts in our 75-year-old population, why troponin I and NT-proBNP may be associated mainly with cardioembolic infarcts as shown recently., (Copyright © 2015 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

While there has been considerable focus on the role and treatment of LDL cholesterol levels, a definitive role of triglycerides in the management of cardiovascular disease has been uncertain. Notably, with increasing triglyceride levels, there is a parallel increase in cholesterol levels carried by triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, which has prompted interest in the use of non-HDL cholesterol levels as a tool guiding interventions. Recent studies have provided evidence for an independent role of triglyceride levels as a cardiovascular risk factor, and recently, an Endocrine Society guideline was published for treatment of hypertriglyceridemia. In contrast to the relative uncertainty regarding triglycerides and cardiovascular disease, a role of very high triglyceride levels as a risk factor for pancreatitis has been well known. The present paper summarizes the underlying evidence for a risk role for triglyceride levels in cardiovascular disease and pancreatitis, current treatment recommendations and areas of future research., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The objective was to evaluate the hypothesis that growth-differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is an independent marker of the long-term risk for both cardiovascular disease and cancer morbidity beyond clinical and biochemical risk factors. Plasma obtained at age 71 was available from 940 subjects in the Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men (ULSAM) cohort. Complete mortality and morbidity data were obtained from public registries. At baseline there were independent associations between GDF-15 and current smoking, diabetes mellitus, biomarkers of cardiac (high-sensitivity troponin-T, NT-proBNP) and renal dysfunction (cystatin-C) and inflammatory activity (C-reactive protein), and previous cardiovascular disease (CVD). During 10 years follow-up there occurred 265 and 131 deaths, 115 and 46 cardiovascular deaths, and 185 and 86 events with coronary heart disease mortality or morbidity in the respective total cohort (n=940) and non-CVD (n=561) cohort. After adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors, one SD increase in log GDF-15 were, in the respective total and non-CVD populations, associated with 48% (95%CI 26 to 73%, p<0.001) and 67% (95%CI 28 to 217%, p<0.001) incremental risk of cardiovascular mortality, 48% (95%CI 33 to 67%, p<0.001) and 61% (95%CI 38 to 89%, p<0.001) of total mortality and 36% (95%CI 19 to 56%, p<0.001) and 44% (95%CI 17 to 76%, p<0.001) of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality. The corresponding incremental increase for cancer mortality in the respective total and non-cancer disease (n=882) population was 46% (95%CI 21 to 77%, p<0.001) and 38% (95%CI 12 to 70%, p<0.001) and for cancer morbidity and mortality in patients without previous cancer disease 30% (95%CI 12 to 51%, p<0.001). In conclusion, in elderly men, GDF-15 improves prognostication of both cardiovascular, cancer mortality and morbidity beyond established risk factors and biomarkers of cardiac, renal dysfunction and inflammation.

Background: Cardiac troponin is emerging as risk indicator in community-dwelling populations. In this study, we investigated the associations of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) to cardiovascular (CV) disease and outcome in elderly men., Methods: Cardiac troponin T was measured using a high-sensitive assay in 940 men aged 71 years participating in the Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men. We assessed both the cross-sectional associations of cTnT to CV risk factors and morbidities including cancer and the longitudinal associations to outcomes over 10 years of follow-up., Results: Cardiac troponin T levels were measurable in 872 subjects (92.8%). In the cross-sectional analyses, cTnT was associated to CV risk factors (diabetes, smoking, and obesity), renal dysfunction, CV disease including atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease, and biomarkers of inflammation and left ventricular dysfunction. In the longitudinal analyses, cTnT independently predicted total mortality and CV events including stroke. The standardized adjusted hazard ratio regarding the composite CV end point was 1.5 (95% CI 1.3-1.8), P < .001, for men with prevalent CV disease and 1.2 (95% CI 1.0-1.4), P = .02, for men without. Cardiac troponin T improved discrimination metrics for all outcomes in the total population. This was mainly driven by the prognostic value of cTnT in subjects with prevalent CV disease., Conclusions: In community-dwelling men, cTnT levels are associated to CV risk factors and morbidities and predict both fatal and nonfatal CV events. The relations to outcome are mainly seen in men with prevalent CV disease indicating that the prognostic value of cTnT in subjects free from CV disease is limited., (© 2013.)

Background: Cardiovascular risk prediction is particularly important in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Yet, data on whether the combined addition of albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improves cardiovascular risk prediction in individuals without CVD in the community is scarce., Methods: We investigated associations between urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER), cystatin C-based eGFR and cardiovascular mortality in a community-based cohort of elderly men (ULSAM study; n = 1113, mean age 71 years, 208 cardiovascular deaths, median follow-up 12.9 years) with prespecified analyses in participants without CVD (n = 649, 86 cardiovascular deaths)., Results: Using multivariable Cox regression, higher UAER and lower eGFR were associated with increased risk for cardiovascular mortality independently of established cardiovascular risk factors in the whole sample and in men without CVD at baseline [subsample without CVD: UAER; hazard ratio (HR) per 1 SD 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.51, P = 0.01; eGFR: HR per 1 SD 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.92, P = 0.007]. Analyses of model discrimination, calibration, reclassification and global fit suggested that UAER and eGFR also add relevant prognostic information beyond established cardiovascular risk factors in participants without prevalent CVD. Interestingly, established cutoffs used to diagnose microalbuminuria (UAER > 20 μg/min) and chronic kidney disease Stage 3 (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), appeared less suitable for cardiovascular risk prediction [integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) 0.006, P = 0.11], while cutoffs UAER > 6 μg/min and eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) significantly improved IDI (0.047, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: UAER and eGFR improved cardiovascular risk prediction beyond established cardiovascular risk factors, suggesting that these kidney biomarkers may be useful in predicting cardiovascular death in elderly men.

Objective: Levels of acute phase reactants are affected by age. The extent to which cardiovascular risk associated with aging is due to an increase in the inflammatory burden is not known. We assessed the relationship with age of inflammatory markers, representing (1) systemic (C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and serum amyloid-A) and (2) vascular (lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) and pentraxin-3) inflammation., Methods and Results: We determined lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) mass and activity, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, serum amyloid-A, and pentraxin-3 levels and other cardiovascular disease risk factors in 336 whites and 224 African Americans. Levels of systemic inflammatory markers increased significantly with age in both ethnic groups (P<0.05 for all), whereas trend patterns of vascular inflammatory markers did not change significantly with age for either group. In multivariate regression models adjusting for confounding variables, age remained independently associated with a composite Z score for systemic but not vascular inflammation (β=0.250, P<0.001, and β=0.276, P<0.001, for whites and African Americans, respectively)., Conclusions: We report an increase in the systemic but not vascular inflammatory burden with age. Levels of both categories of inflammatory markers with age were similar across ethnicity after adjustment for confounders. Our results underscore the importance of age in evaluating inflammatory markers to assess cardiovascular risk.

Background: Impaired endothelial function has been implicated as a cause of cardiovascular disease. Little is known of the relations of measures of endothelial function in resistance and conduit arteries to incident cardiovascular disease in the general population, and available techniques have not been compared., Methods and Results: In 1016 participants (70 years of age) of the population-based Prospective Study of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) study (52% women), we measured endothelium-dependent vasodilation using the invasive forearm technique with acetylcholine given in the brachial artery, the brachial artery ultrasound technique with measurement of flow-mediated dilatation, and the pulse-wave analysis-based method with β-2-agonist terbutaline provocation. During 5 years of follow-up, 101 participants experienced a composite end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death, excluding the 85 persons with a history of myocardial infarction or stroke at baseline. In logistic regression models adjusted for several established and novel cardiovascular disease risk factors and medications, endothelium-dependent vasodilation by the invasive forearm technique with acetylcholine was associated with risk of the end point (odds ratio, 0.72 per SD; 95% confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.93; P=0.01). Endothelial function by the other 2 methods was not related to risk of the end point. Addition of endothelium-dependent vasodilation to the Framingham risk score improved discrimination of risk of the end point., Conclusions: Endothelium-dependent vasodilation in resistance arteries, but not in the brachial conduit artery (flow-mediated dilatation), was associated with 5-year risk of a composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke independently of major cardiovascular disease risk factors. This vascular measurement improved risk discrimination when added to an established risk score in an elderly population.

Lipoprotein (a), [Lp(a)] has many properties in common with low-density lipoprotein, (LDL) but contains a unique protein apolipoprotein(a), linked to apolipoprotein B-100 by a single disulfide bond. There is a substantial size heterogeneity of apo(a), and generally smaller apo(a) sizes tend to correspond to higher plasma Lp(a) levels, but this relation is far from linear, underscoring the importance to assess allele-specific apo(a) levels. The presence of apo(a), a highly charged, carbohydrate-rich, hydrophilic protein may obscure key features of the LDL moiety and offer opportunities for binding to vessel wall elements. Recently, interest in Lp(a) has increased because studies over the past decade have confirmed and more robustly demonstrated a risk factor role of Lp(a) for cardiovascular disease. In particular, levels of Lp(a) carried in particles with smaller size apo(a) isoforms are associated with coronary artery disease (CAD). Other studies suggest that proinflammatory conditions may modulate risk factor properties of Lp(a). Further, Lp(a) may act as a preferential acceptor for proinflammatory oxidized phospholipids transferred from tissues or from other lipoproteins. However, at present only a limited number of agents (e.g., nicotinic acid and estrogen) has proven efficacy in lowering Lp(a) levels. Although Lp(a) has not been definitely established as a cardiovascular risk factor and no guidelines presently recommend intervention, Lp(a)-lowering therapy might offer benefits in subgroups of patients with high Lp(a) levels., (© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Recent prospective studies in healthy individuals suggest that the postprandial triglyceride (TG) level is a better independent predictor for assessing future CVD events than fasting TG levels. In contrast, results have been more controversial among diabetic patients, as some studies report a positive association between postprandial TG and CVD. This raises the issue of to what extent postprandial TG levels may be of predictive value in the diabetic population. One possibility impacting on the predictive power of postprandial TG in identifying CVD risk may be the presence of other risk factors, including alterations in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, which could make it more difficult to identify the impact of postprandial lipemia on cardiovascular risk. The findings provide a challenge to develop a better approach to assess the impact of postprandial lipemia on CVD risk under diabetic conditions.

Objective: To define the optimal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) cut off for discriminating the risk of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death., Design: Prospective longitudinal observational study., Setting: A community-based cohort., Participants: A total of 2176 nondiabetic 50-year-old men without cardiovascular disease., Methods: The men were followed until age 70. GFR was estimated at baseline using the Cockcroft-Gault formula. The optimal GFR cut-off points for discriminating risk of a fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death were defined as the GFR levels maximizing integrated discrimination improvement (IDI)., Main Outcome Measures: Fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death., Results: During follow-up, 264 men experienced a fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, and 218 died of cardiovascular disease. The IDI-defined optimal GFR cut offs in this study were 98 mL min(-1) for discriminating myocardial infarction risk and 92 mL min(-1) for discriminating risk of cardiovascular death. In Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for established risk factors, the myocardial infarction risk was substantially higher in men with GFR below versus above 98 mL min(-1) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-2.3, P < 0.001], and the risk of cardiovascular death was doubled in men with GFR below versus above 92 mL min(-1) (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-3.0, P < 0.001)., Conclusion: The GFR cut-off point for optimal discrimination of cardiovascular risk in the general population may be higher than previously suggested.

The successful introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), a combination of potent antiretroviral agents, including protease inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, has impacted positively on morbidity and mortality among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients. Over time, HAART has been associated with a number of metabolic and anthropometric abnormalities, including dyslipidemia and insulin resistance as well as subcutaneous fat loss and abdominal obesity, potentially contributing to cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have more firmly established that both HIV infection and HAART might increase the risk of clinical cardiovascular events. Furthermore, whereas HIV/HAART is associated with multiple aspects of endocrine dysfunction, there has been less focus on bone disease, although some studies indicate a higher prevalence of osteoporosis among HIV-positive subjects compared to HIV-negative controls. The relationship between bone and fat metabolism under HIV-positive conditions deserves further attention, and available data suggest the possibility of an intriguing connection. In the future, an increasing population of aging HIV-positive patients with a spectrum of antiretroviral therapies and accumulation of endocrine abnormalities and conventional cardiovascular risk factors will present preventive and therapeutic challenges to our health-care system.

Heart disease in women is associated with high levels of morbidity and mortality. Although many of the underlying causes are similar for both genders, cardiovascular disease among women has some unique features, including higher coronary heart disease mortality, higher frequency of sudden cardiac death without previous symptoms, and increased mortality among older women compared to men following a myocardial infarction. During recent years, increasing efforts have been placed on identifying preventive measures, but translation of knowledge from epidemiological studies and clinical trials remain incomplete, particularly in women. The recent launch of the National Institutes of Health's Clinical and Translational Science Award program offers opportunities to address these gaps and represent a unique opportunity to foster a new generation of researchers familiar with important issues regarding women's cardiovascular health.

Apolipoproteins (apo) E and C-I are components of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins and impact their metabolism. Functional polymorphisms have been established in apoE but not in apoC-I. We studied the relationship between apoE and apoC-I gene polymorphisms and plasma lipoproteins and coronary artery disease (CAD) in 211 African Americans and 306 Caucasians. In African Americans but not in Caucasians, apoC-I H2-carriers had significantly lower total and LDL cholesterol and apoB levels, and higher glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR levels compared with H1 homozygotes. Differences across CAD phenotypes were seen for the apoC-I polymorphism. African-American H2-carriers without CAD had significantly lower total cholesterol (P < 0.001), LDL cholesterol (P < 0.001), and apoB (P < 0.001) levels compared with H1 homozygotes, whereas no differences were found across apoC-I genotypes for African Americans with CAD. Among African-American apoC-I H1 homozygotes, subjects with CAD had a profile similar to the metabolic syndrome (i.e., higher triglyceride, glucose, and insulin) compared with subjects without CAD. For African-American H2-carriers, subjects with CAD had a pro-atherogenic lipid pattern (i.e., higher LDL cholesterol and apoB levels), compared with subjects without CAD. ApoC-I genotypes showed an ethnically distinct phenotype relationship with regard to CAD and CAD risk factors.

Background: Diseases with elevated levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) such as primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism are associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular disease and death. However, data on the prospective association between circulating PTH levels and cardiovascular mortality in the community are lacking., Methods and Results: The Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men (ULSAM), a community-based cohort of elderly men (mean age, 71 years; n=958), was used to investigate the association between plasma PTH and cardiovascular mortality. During follow-up (median, 9.7 years), 117 participants died of cardiovascular causes. In Cox proportional-hazards models adjusted for established cardiovascular risk factors (age, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, smoking, body mass index, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, antihypertensive treatment, lipid-lowering treatment, and history of cardiovascular disease), higher plasma PTH was associated with higher risk for cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio for 1-SD increase in PTH, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 1.60; P<0.001). This association remained essentially unaltered in participants without previous cardiovascular disease and in participants with normal PTH (<6.8 pmol/L) with no other signs of a disturbed mineral metabolism (normal serum calcium, 2.2 to 2.6 mmol/L; normal glomerular filtration rate, >50 mL . min(-1) . 1.73 m(-2) and without vitamin D deficiency, plasma 25-OH vitamin D >37.5 nmol/L). Interestingly, elevated plasma PTH (>5.27 pmol/L) accounted for 20% (95% confidence interval, 10 to 26) of the population-attributable risk proportion for cardiovascular mortality., Conclusions: Plasma PTH levels predict cardiovascular mortality in the community, even in individuals with PTH within the normal range. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical implications of measuring PTH in cardiovascular risk prediction and to elucidate whether PTH is a modifiable risk factor.

Background: The incremental usefulness of adding multiple biomarkers from different disease pathways for predicting the risk of death from cardiovascular causes has not, to our knowledge, been evaluated among the elderly., Methods: We used data from the Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men (ULSAM), a community-based cohort of elderly men, to investigate whether a combination of biomarkers that reflect myocardial cell damage, left ventricular dysfunction, renal failure, and inflammation (troponin I, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, cystatin C, and C-reactive protein, respectively) improved the risk stratification of a person beyond an assessment that was based on the established risk factors for cardiovascular disease (age, systolic blood pressure, use or nonuse of antihypertensive treatment, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, use or nonuse of lipid-lowering treatment, presence or absence of diabetes, smoking status, and body-mass index)., Results: During follow-up (median, 10.0 years), 315 of the 1135 participants in our study (mean age, 71 years at baseline) died; 136 deaths were the result of cardiovascular disease. In Cox proportional-hazards models adjusted for established risk factors, all of the biomarkers significantly predicted the risk of death from cardiovascular causes. The C statistic increased significantly when the four biomarkers were incorporated into a model with established risk factors, both in the whole cohort (C statistic with biomarkers vs. without biomarkers, 0.766 vs. 0.664; P<0.001) and in the group of 661 participants who did not have cardiovascular disease at baseline (0.748 vs. 0.688, P=0.03). The improvement in risk assessment remained strong when it was estimated by other statistical measures of model discrimination, calibration, and global fit., Conclusions: Our data suggest that in elderly men with or without prevalent cardiovascular disease, the simultaneous addition of several biomarkers of cardiovascular and renal abnormalities substantially improves the risk stratification for death from cardiovascular causes beyond that of a model that is based only on established risk factors., (Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Plasma levels of lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Lp(a) has many properties in common with low-density lipoprotein (LDL), including a cholesteryl ester-rich lipid core and the presence of one copy of apolipoprotein B-100; both apoB-100 and the lipid core are pro-atherogenic. In addition, Lp(a) contains a unique hydrophilic, carbohydrate-rich protein, apo(a), linked to apoB through a single disulfide bond connecting the C-terminal regions of the two proteins. The similarities between apolipoprotein(a), apo(a), and plasminogen has initiated numerous studies on the possible role of Lp(a) as a prothrombotic agent. Studies to date suggest that Lp(a) has antifibrinolytic and procoagulant properties. In this review, we summarize recent studies focused on the interaction between Lp(a) and platelets. Collectively, results to date illustrate that thrombogenicity associated with Lp(a) could be due to risk associated with the LDL moiety, with the apo(a) moiety, or from the combination of those in Lp(a). Present findings suggest that the various components of Lp(a) may impact to a varying degree on different underlying pathways involved in platelet activation and aggregation. On balance, results indicate an effect by Lp(a) on platelet function and future studies focused on specific Lp(a) components, such as the role of apo(a) and of the LDL-like lipid moiety, are needed., (Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Few studies on echocardiographic and Doppler indices of cardiac function as predictors for cardiovascular mortality have been performed in the general population. The novel myocardial performance index (MPI, also denoted as Tei-Doppler index) has been suggested to reflect both left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function., Methods: We investigated whether 10 different echocardiographic and Doppler indices of cardiac function predicted cardiovascular mortality by using a population-based cohort of 583 seventy-year-old men with a mean follow-up time of 6.8 years., Results: In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis for a 1-SD increase including LV ejection fraction, E/A ratio, MPI, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors (previous myocardial infarction, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, smoking status, and LV hypertrophy), both ejection fraction (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.90, P < .05) and MPI (HR = 2.92, 95% CI 1.71-4.97, P < .0001) were found to be independent predictors for cardiovascular mortality. After excluding subjects with coronary heart disease, only MPI remained a significant predictor (HR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.11-4.27, P < .03, for 1-SD increase), and neither ejection fraction, E/A ratio, nor any of the cardiovascular risk factors remained significant predictors., Conclusion: Myocardial performance index is a predictor for cardiovascular mortality, independent of other measurements of cardiac function and of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in elderly men free from coronary heart disease.

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], is present only in humans, Old World nonhuman primates, and the European hedgehog. Lp(a) has many properties in common with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) but contains a unique protein, apo(a), which is structurally different from other apolipoproteins. The size of the apo(a) gene is highly variable, resulting in the protein molecular weight ranging from 300 to 800 kDa; this large variation may be caused by neutral evolution in the absence of any selection advantage. Apo(a) influences to a major extent metabolic and physicochemical properties of Lp(a), and the size polymorphism of the apo(a) gene contributes to the pronounced heterogeneity of Lp(a). There is an inverse relationship between apo(a) size and Lp(a) levels; however, this pattern is complex. For a given apo(a) size, there is a considerable variation in Lp(a) levels across individuals, underscoring the importance to assess allele-specific Lp(a) levels. Further, Lp(a) levels differ between populations, and blacks have generally higher levels than Asians and whites, adjusting for apo(a) sizes. In addition to the apo(a) size polymorphism, an upstream pentanucleotide repeat (TTTTA(n)) affects Lp(a) levels. Several meta-analyses have provided support for an association between Lp(a) and coronary artery disease, and the levels of Lp(a) carried in particles with smaller size apo(a) isoforms are associated with cardiovascular disease or with preclinical vascular changes. Further, there is an interaction between Lp(a) and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The physiological role of Lp(a) is unknown, although a majority of studies implicate Lp(a) as a risk factor.

Postprandial lipemia, characterized by a rise in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins after eating, is a dynamic, nonsteady-state condition in which humans spend the majority of time. There are several lines of evidence suggesting that postprandial lipemia increases risk of atherogenesis. Clinical data show a correlation between postprandial lipoproteins and the presence/progression of coronary artery disease and carotid intimal thickness. Mechanistic studies demonstrate that triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants may have adverse effects on endothelium and can penetrate into the subendothelial space. Exchange of core lipids between postprandial lipoproteins and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) is increased during prolonged lipemia, resulting in small, dense LDL particles and reduced HDL cholesterol levels. Hemostatic variables, including clotting factors, platelet reactivity, and monocyte cytokine expression, may be increased during postprandial lipemia. Collectively, these data suggest that assessment and treatment of atherosclerosis should include parameters related to postprandial lipemia.

Background: There is a well-established inverse relation between education and mortality from cardiovascular disease and cancer. The reasons for this are still in part unclear. We aimed to investigate whether differences in traditional vascular risk factors, adult height, physical activity, and biomarkers of fatty acid and antioxidant intake, could explain this association., Methods: In all, 2301 50-year-old men in Uppsala, Sweden (82% of the background population) were examined with regard to educational level, blood pressure, blood glucose, body mass index, serum lipids, smoking, body height, physical activity, serum beta carotene, alpha tocopherol, selenium, and serum fatty acids in cholesterol esters. Cause-specific mortality was registered 25 years later., Results: Low education was associated with a higher rate of mortality from cardiovascular disease (crude relative risk [RR] = 1.67, 95% CI : 1.17-2.39), and from cancer (crude RR = 1.94, 95% CI : 1.21-3.10), compared to high educational attainment. Men with high education had an overall more beneficial risk factor profile concerning traditional cardiovascular risk factors, physical activity, and biomarkers of dietary intake of antioxidants and fat. After adjustment for all examined risk factors, the inverse gradient between education and cardiovascular mortality disappeared (RR in low education = 1.01. 95% CI : 0.67-1.52). Controlling for smoking, physical activity and dietary biomarkers explained less than half of the excess cancer mortality in the lower educational groups. Smoking (adjusted RR = 1.89, 95% CI : 1.37-2.61), and high proportions of palmitoleic acid in serum cholesterol esters (adjusted RR per 1 SD = 1.39, 95% CI : 1.07-1.82) predicted cancer mortality, independently of all other factors. There were no independent relations between serum antioxidants and mortality., Conclusions: These data indicate that modifiable lifestyle factors mediate the inverse gradient between education and death from cerebro- and cardiovascular disease. Smoking, physical activity and dietary factors explained half of the excess cancer mortality in lower educated groups. Further studies are needed to explore the proposed association between palmitoleic acid, a marker of high intake of animal and dairy fat, and cancer.

Background: Abdominal obesity is strongly related to metabolic disorders. Recent research suggests that dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) reduces body fat and may improve metabolic variables in animals. The metabolic effects of CLA in abdominally obese humans have not yet been tested., Objective: To investigate the short-term effect of CLA on abdominal fat and cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged men with metabolic disorders., Methods: Twenty-five abdominally obese men (waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), 1.05+/-0.05; body mass index (BMI), 32+/-2.7 kg/m(2) (mean+/-s.d.)) who were between 39 and 64-y-old participated in a double-blind randomised controlled trial for 4 weeks. Fourteen men received 4.2 g CLA/day and 10 men received a placebo. The main endpoints were differences between the two groups in sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), serum cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, free fatty acids, glucose and insulin., Results: At baseline, there were no significant differences between groups in anthropometric or metabolic variables. After 4 weeks there was a significant decrease in SAD (cm) in the CLA group compared to placebo (P=0.04, 95% CI; -1.12, -0.02). Other measurements of anthropometry or metabolism showed no significant differences between the groups., Conclusions: These results indicate that CLA supplementation for 4 weeks in obese men with the metabolic syndrome may decrease abdominal fat, without concomitant effects on overall obesity or other cardiovascular risk factors. Because of the limited sample size, the effects of CLA in abdominal obesity need to be further investigated in larger trials with longer duration.

Background: Little information is available about HDL subpopulations during dietary changes., Objective: The objective was to investigate the effect of reductions in total and saturated fat intakes on HDL subpopulations., Design: Multiracial, young and elderly men and women (n = 103) participating in the double-blind, randomized DELTA (Dietary Effects on Lipoproteins and Thrombogenic Activities) Study consumed 3 different diets, each for 8 wk: an average American diet (AAD: 34.3% total fat,15.0% saturated fat), the American Heart Association Step I diet (28.6% total fat, 9.0% saturated fat), and a diet low in saturated fat (25.3% total fat, 6.1% saturated fat)., Results: HDL(2)-cholesterol concentrations, by differential precipitation, decreased (P < 0.001) in a stepwise fashion after the reduction of total and saturated fat: 0.58 +/- 0.21, 0.53 +/- 0.19, and 0.48 +/- 0.18 mmol/L with the AAD, Step I, and low-fat diets, respectively. HDL(3) cholesterol decreased (P < 0.01) less: 0.76 +/- 0.13, 0.73 +/- 0.12, and 0.72 +/- 0.11 mmol/L with the AAD, Step I, and low-fat diets, respectively. As measured by nondenaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, the larger-size HDL(2b) subpopulation decreased with the reduction in dietary fat, and a corresponding relative increase was seen for the smaller-sized HDL(3a, 3b), and (3c) subpopulations (P < 0.01). HDL(2)-cholesterol concentrations correlated negatively with serum triacylglycerol concentrations on all 3 diets: r = -0.46, -0.37, and -0.45 with the AAD, Step I, and low-fat diets, respectively (P < 0.0001). A similar negative correlation was seen for HDL(2b), whereas HDL(3a, 3b), and (3c) correlated positively with triacylglycerol concentrations. Diet-induced changes in serum triacylglycerol were negatively correlated with changes in HDL(2) and HDL(2b) cholesterol., Conclusions: A reduction in dietary total and saturated fat decreased both large (HDL(2) and HDL(2b)) and small, dense HDL subpopulations, although decreases in HDL(2) and HDL(2b) were most pronounced.

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is an established cardiovascular risk factor in adults. We sought to evaluate whether raised Lp(a) levels were predictive of a family history of early cardiovascular disease (CVD) in children already at increased risk for premature atherosclerosis because of elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Lp(a) and serum lipid levels were measured in 69 children and offspring with established moderate to severe hypercholesterolemia (serum cholesterol > 170 mg/dL) who were aged 10.7 +/- 4.3 years (range 1.5 to 21 years) and had been referred to a pediatric lipid center. The children represented families with a positive (n = 27) or negative (n = 42) history for premature CVD (<55 years of age in parent or grandparent). In all children, Lp(a) levels ranged from 1 to 140 mg/dL, with a median of 29 mg/dL. Mean total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were 234 mg/dL, 166 mg/dL, and 45 mg/dL, respectively. There was no difference in median Lp(a) levels between the children with a positive family history and those with a negative family history (29.9 mg/dL vs 29.0 mg/dL, respectively). In contrast, children with a positive family history showed significantly higher LDL cholesterol levels (186 +/- 61 mg/dL vs 153 +/- 52 mg/dL, P = .02). Thus, in this group of hypercholesterolemic children, LDL cholesterol but not Lp(a) levels were associated with a family history of premature CVD. Further studies are needed to identify additional specific risk factors associated with the development of CVD in this population.

Lipoprotein (a) has been implicated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Recently, considerable progress has been made toward understanding the importance of genetics in the regulation of plasma levels of lipoprotein (a). However, the issue as to whether lipoprotein (a) levels should be treated is still debated and furthermore the possibilities to influence lipoprotein (a) levels remain limited. The potential clinical importance of lipoprotein (a) has stimulated interest in the dietary and pharmacologic agents that affect this lipoprotein. At present, only a few of the existing therapeutic tools, such as nicotinic acid and estrogens, have been found to consistently affect lipoprotein (a).

A simple model of physiological thermoregulation, previously adapted to predict the thermoregulatory consequences of exposure to the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging environment, has been further adapted to simulate impaired cardiovascular function. Restrictions on the rate of skin blood flow (SkBF), ranging from 0 to 89% of normal, were studied. Predictions of physiological heat loss responses in real time were generated as a function of ambient temperature (Ta), relative humidity (RH) and rate of whole-body radiofrequency (RF) energy deposition (SAR). Under conditions that are desirable in the clinic (Ta = 20 degrees C, 50% RH, still air), moderate restrictions (up to 67%) of SkBF yield tolerable increases in core temperature (delta Tco less than or equal to 1 degree C) during NMR exposures (SAR less than or equal to 4 W/kg) of 40 min or less. Increased Ta and RH exacerbate the thermal stress imposed by absorbed RF energy; severely impaired SkBF encourages short NMR exposures (e.g., 20 min or less) at SARs less than or equal to 3 W/kg. In warm/humid environments, sweating is predicted to be profuse and evaporative cooling curtailed, yielding a state of extreme thermal discomfort. Added insulation (e.g., a blanket) is discouraged. Some guidelines, incorporating SkBF restrictions, Ta, RH, and insulation, are offered for the prediction of tolerable NMR exposure conditions.

Background. In the general population, a high apoB/apoA-I ratio is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. However, whether this is the case in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is currently unknown. Study design. The apoB/apoA-I ratio was evaluated in 391 incident CKD stage 5 patients examined close to dialysis initiation, and again after 1 year of dialysis in a subgroup of 182 patients, subsequently followed for up to 3 years. Results. Baseline values of the apoB/apoA-I ratio as well as changes in the ratio during the first year of dialysis correlated with body mass index (BMI) and fat mass. The baseline apoB/apoA-I ratio showed no association with 4-year mortality. However, after adjustment for confounders, a high apoB/apoA-I ratio (>0.9) predicted short-term (first year) survival [hazard ratio (HR): 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13–0.85)] and long-term (next 3 years) mortality (HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.01–2.96). An increase in the apoB/apoA-I ratio during the first year of dialysis was linked to a survival advantage thereafter (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.22–0.98). However, this association lost its significance (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.26–1.36) after adjustment for indices of protein-energy wasting. Conclusions. A high apoB/apoA-I ratio and an increase in this ratio during the first year on dialysis were associated with short-term survival advantage in CKD patients. This paradoxical relationship represents an example of the so-called reverse epidemiology phenomenon in CKD patients and suggests that the apoB/apoA-I ratio should always be interpreted with caution in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Waist girth and BMI are commonly used as markers of cardiometabolic risk. Accumulating data however suggest that sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) or "abdominal height" may be a better marker of intra-abdominal adiposity and cardiometabolic risk. We aimed to identify cutoffs for SAD using a cardiometabolic risk score. Design. A population-based crosssectional study. Methods. In 4032 subjects (1936 men and 2096 women) at age 60, different anthropometric variables (SAD, BMI, waist girth, and waist-to-hip ratio) were measured and cardiometabolic risk score calculated. ROC curves were used to assess cutoffs. Results. Among men SAD showed the strongest correlations to the majority of the individual risk factors; whereas in women SAD was equal to that of waist girth. In the whole sample, the area under the ROC curve was highest for SAD. The optimal SAD cutoff for an elevated cardiometabolic risk score in men was ~22 cm (95%CI; 21.6 to 22.8) and in women ~20 cm (95%CI; 19.4 to 20.8). These cutoffs were similar if the Framingham risk score was used. Conclusions. These cutoffs may be used in research and screening to identify "metabolically obese" men who would benefit from lifestyle and pharmacological interventions. These results need to be verified in younger age groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Loss of subcutaneous (SAT) with sparing of visceral (VAT) adipose tissue (AT) has been documented in HIV + men and women. Intermuscular AT (IMAT) rivals VAT in independent associations with cardiovascular risk. Objective: To determine whether the size and distribution of IMAT differs in HIV+ vs. HIV- men and/or women. Design: We used whole-body MRI to measure VAT, IMAT and four SAT compartments and compared them by HIV status using whole-body skeletal muscle (SM) or total AT (TAT) as co-variates in multi-ethnic groups of healthy HIV- (n=86) and stable HIV+ (n=76) men and women. Results: The sizes of AT depots (adjusting for SM) did not differ by HIV status, except for smaller gluteal SAT (lower trunk, between L4-L5 to greater trochanter) in both sexes (P<0.05). The AT distribution (adjusting for TAT) was significantly different, with larger VAT (P<0.05) and smaller gluteal and limb SAT (P<0.05) in both HIV+ sexes; IMAT increased more with TAT in HIV+ vs. HIV- men (P<0.05 for slope interaction) but there were no significant differences in women. There were significant race by HIV interactions in AT distribution with more pronounced VAT differences in non-Hispanic white men and larger trunk SAT in African Americans HIV+ vs. HIV-. Conclusion: The AT distribution differed markedly in HIV+ vs. HIV- with limb and lower body SAT representing a smaller proportion of TAT in HIV+ in both sexes and IMAT representing a larger proportion of TAT in HIV+ vs. HIV- men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]