Search

A progressive, treadmill-based VO2max is the gold standard of cardiorespiratory fitness determination but is rarely used in pediatric clinics due to time requirements and cost. Simpler and shorter fitness tests such as the Squat Test or Step Test may be feasible and clinically useful alternatives. However, performance comparisons of these tests to treadmill VO2max tests are lacking. The primary aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the correlation between Squat and Step Test scores and VO2max in a pediatric population. As secondary outcomes, we calculated correlations between Rated Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE) scores, NIH PROMIS Physical Activity scores, and BMI z-score with VO2max, and we also evaluated the ability of each fitness test to discriminate low and high-risk patients based on the FITNESSGram. Forty children aged 10-17 completed these simple cardiorespiratory fitness tests. Statistically significant correlations were observed between VO2max and the Step Test (r = -0.549) and Squat Test (r = -0.429) scores, as well as participant BMI z-score (r = -0.458). RPE and PROMIS scores were not observed to be correlated with VO2max. Area Under the Receiver Operator Curve was relatively high for BMI z-scores and the Step Test (AUC = 0.813, 0.713 respectively), and lower for the Squat Test (AUC = 0.610) in discriminating risk according to FITNESSGram Scores. In this sample, the Step Test performed best overall. These tests were safe, feasible, and may add great value in assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in a clinical setting., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is the only major risk factor that is not routinely assessed in the clinical setting, for preventive medicine. A valid and practical CRF test is needed for use in the clinics. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the validity of a 3-minute squat test to assess CRF in primary care., Methods: A cross-sectional study in which the participants performed both the Ruffier squat test and the Balke maximal treadmill test. The study was conducted in a clinical setting from September 2016 to March 2017. We recruited a convenient sample of 40 adults between 18 and 64 years from the general U.S. population. Participants completed 30 squats in 45 seconds, paced by a metronome. Heart rate was measured at rest (P1), immediately after the test (P2), one minute after the test (P3). [Formula: see text] was measured using the Balke maximal treadmill fitness test., Results: Of the 40 participants, there were 18 men and 22 women. Mean age was 31.2 years (SD = 9.9). We found that the best [Formula: see text] predictors were HR features P1/height and (P2-P3)/age3. Our best-performing model using these two features predicted individuals' CRF levels with an adjusted R2 of 0.637, sensitivity of 0.79, and specificity of 0.56., Conclusions: The study provided strong evidence for the validity of the squat test in the clinical setting. Further, the equation of our model along with [Formula: see text] normative tables provides an efficient and easy way to assess CRF in a primary care setting., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.