Search

This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations on basic life support summarizes evidence evaluations performed for 22 topics that were prioritized by the Basic Life Support Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. The evidence reviews include 16 systematic reviews, 5 scoping reviews, and 1 evidence update. Per agreement within the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, new or revised treatment recommendations were only made after a systematic review. Systematic reviews were performed for the following topics: dispatch diagnosis of cardiac arrest, use of a firm surface for CPR, sequence for starting CPR (compressions-airway-breaths versus airway-breaths-compressions), CPR before calling for help, duration of CPR cycles, hand position during compressions, rhythm check timing, feedback for CPR quality, alternative techniques, public access automated external defibrillator programs, analysis of rhythm during chest compressions, CPR before defibrillation, removal of foreign-body airway obstruction, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, drowning, and harm from CPR to victims not in cardiac arrest. The topics that resulted in the most extensive task force discussions included CPR during transport, CPR before calling for help, resuscitation care for suspected opioid-associated emergencies, feedback for CPR quality, and analysis of rhythm during chest compressions. After discussion of the scoping reviews and the evidence update, the task force prioritized several topics for new systematic reviews.

Out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a global public health problem, with survival rates remaining low at around 10% or less despite widespread cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training and availability of automated external defibrillators (AEDs). This is partly due to the challenges of knowing when and where a sudden OHCA occurs and where the nearest AED is located. In response, countries around the world have begun to use network technology‐based smartphone applications. These applications are activated by emergency medical service dispatchers and alert preregistered volunteer first responders (VFRs) to nearby OHCAs using Global Positioning System localization. Accumulating evidence, although mostly from observational studies, shows their effectiveness in increasing the rate of bystander CPR, defibrillation, and patient survival. Current guidelines recommend the use of these VFR alerting systems, and the results of ongoing randomized trials are awaited for further dissemination. This article also proposed the concept of a life‐saving mobile network (LMN), which uses opportunistic network and wireless sensor network technologies to create a dynamic mesh network of potential victims, rescuers, and defibrillators. The LMN works by detecting a fatal arrhythmia with a wearable sensor device, localizing the victim and the nearest AED with nearby smartphones, and notifying VFRs through peer‐to‐peer communication. While there are challenges and limitations to implementing the LMN in society, this innovative network technology would reduce the tragedy of sudden cardiac death from OHCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Anaesthesiologie & Intensivmedizin is the property of DGAI e.V. - Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Anasthesiologie und Intensivmedizin e.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Anaesthesiologie & Intensivmedizin is the property of DGAI e.V. - Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Anasthesiologie und Intensivmedizin e.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: Hypothermia is an uncommon cause of cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom, and more commonly occurs in countries experiencing avalanches and significant winter climates; however, this case demonstrates that the presentation can occur in the United Kingdom. This case adds to a body of evidence that prolonged resuscitation can be successful in patients suffering a cardiac arrest secondary to hypothermia, leading to a good neurological outcome. Case presentation: The patient suffered a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest following rescue from a free-flowing river, and underwent prolonged resuscitation. The patient presented in persistent ventricular fibrillation, unresponsive to defibrillation attempts. An oesophageal probe recorded the patient's temperature as 24°C. Rescuers were guided by the Resuscitation Council UK advanced life support algorithm to withhold drug therapy and limit defibrillation attempts to three, until the patient had been rewarmed to above 30°C. Appropriate triage of the patient to an extracorporeal life support (ECLS) capable centre allowed specialised treatment to be initiated, and culminated in successful resuscitation once normothermia was restored. After a short stay in intensive care, the patient was discharged for rehabilitation due to a hypoxic spinal cord injury before discharge home. Conclusion: This case highlights that hypothermia is a reversible cause of cardiac arrest, which needs to be recognised and acted upon appropriately to provide the best possible chance for a positive outcome. Low-reading thermometers capable of identifying the temperature thresholds stated in the Resuscitation Council UK guidelines are required, to allow clinicians to adapt their practice according to the presenting situation. Tympanic thermometers are often limited to their lowest recordable temperature, and invasive monitoring such as oesophageal or rectal probes are not common in UK ambulance service practice. With the necessary equipment, patients can be triaged to an ECLS-capable centre, allowing them to receive the specialist rewarming that they require. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Journal of First Aid Education is the property of International Journal of First Aid Education and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Code Blues allow a rapid, hospital wide response to acutely deteriorating patients. The concept of frailty is being increasingly recognised as an important element in determining outcomes of critically ill patients. We hypothesised that increasing frailty would be associated with worse outcomes following a Code Blue. Aims: To investigate the association between increasing frailty and outcomes of Code Blues. Methods: Single‐centre retrospective design of patients admitted to Frankston Hospital in Australia between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017 who triggered a Code Blue. Frailty evaluation was made based on electronic medical records as were the details and the outcomes of the Code Blue. The primary outcome measure was a composite of hospital mortality or Cerebral Performance Categories scale ≥3. Secondary outcomes included the immediate outcome of the Code Blue and hospital mortality. Results: One hundred and forty‐eight of 911 screened patients were included in the final analysis. Seventy‐three were deemed 'frail' and the remainder deemed 'fit'. Seventy‐eight percent of frail patients reached the primary outcome, compared with 41% of fit patients (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated frailty to be associated with primary outcome (odds ratio = 2.87; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28–6.44; P = 0.01). A cardiac aetiology for the Code Blue was also associated with an increased odds of primary outcome (OR = 3.52; 95% CI 1.51–8.05; P = 0.004). Conclusions: Frailty is independently associated with the composite outcome of hospital mortality or severe disability following a Code Blue. Frailty is an important tool in prognostication for these patients and might aid in discussions regarding treatment limitations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Current guidelines emphasize the assistance of the emergency dispatcher in bystander cardiopulmonary resusitation (CPR). Its quality, however, has varied across cases.Objective: To determine the effect of repetitive coaching by dispatchers using verbal encouragement on the quality of lay-rescuer CPR.Methods: We conducted a dispatch-assisted CPR (DACPR) simulation study. Participants with no CPR training within the previous year were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 DACPR simulations. One was the No Coaching Group: callers were told to perform CPR and the dispatcher periodically confirmed that the caller was performing CPR. The second group was the Coaching Group: the dispatcher repetitively coached, encouraged, and counted aloud using a metronome. Participants performed CPR for 2 min under instruction from the study dispatcher. Parameters including chest compression depth, rate, and chest compression fraction were recorded by video camera and CPR manikin.Results: Forty-nine participants 20 to 50 years of age were recruited, and 48 completed the simulation (Coaching Group, n = 27; No Coaching Group, n = 21). The chest compression fraction was higher in the Coaching Group (99.4% vs. 93.0%, p = 0.005) and no participants interrupted chest compression more than 10 s in this group. When comparing the average depth of each 30-s period in each group, the depth increased over time in the Coaching Group (40.9 mm, 43.9 mm, 44.1 mm, and 42.8 mm), while it slightly decreased in the No Coaching Group (40.6 mm, 40.1 mm, 39.4 mm, and 39.8 mm).Conclusions: Repetitive verbal encouragements augmented chest compression depth with less-hands off time. Continuous coaching by dispatchers can optimize lay-rescuer CPR. © 2022 Elsevier Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: One-fifth of Australia's population do not speak English at home. International studies have found emergency calls with language barriers (LB) result in longer delays to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) recognition, and lower rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and survival. This study compared LB and non-LB OHCA call time intervals in an Australian emergency medical service (EMS).Methods: The retrospective cohort study measured time intervals from call commencement for primary outcomes: (1) address acquisition; (2) OHCA recognition; (3) CPR initiation; (4) telecommunicator CPR (t-CPR) compressions, in all identified LB calls and a 2:1 random sample of non-LB EMS calls from January to June 2019. Results for time intervals #1, 2, and 4 were benchmarked against the American Heart Association's (AHA) t-CPR minimal acceptable time standards. Patient survival outcomes were compared.Results: We identified 50 (14%) LB calls from a cohort of 353 calls. LB calls took longer than non-LB calls (n=100) for: address acquisition (median 29 vs 14 secs, p<0.001), OHCA recognition (103 vs 85 secs, p=0.02), and CPR initiation (206 vs 164 secs, p=0.01), but not for t-CPR compressions (292 vs 248 secs, p=0.12). Rates of OHCA recognition and 30-day-survival did not differ but smaller proportions of LB calls met the AHA standards.Conclusion: Time delays found in LB calls point to phases of the call which need further qualitative investigation to understand how to improve communication. Overall, training call-takers for LB calls may assist caller understanding and cooperation during OHCAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study aimed to develop an AI model for detecting a caller's emotional state during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest calls by processing audio recordings of dispatch communications.Methods: Audio recordings of 337 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest calls from March-April 2011 were retrieved. The callers' emotional state was classified based on the emotional content and cooperative scores. Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients extracted essential information from the voice signals. A support vector machine was utilised for the automatic judgement, and repeated random sub-sampling cross validation (RRS-CV) was applied to evaluate robustness. The results from the artificial intelligence classifier were compared with the consensus of expert reviewers.Results: The audio recordings were classified into five emotional content and cooperative score levels. The proposed model had an average positive predictive value of 72.97%, a negative predictive value of 93.47%, sensitivity of 38.76%, and specificity of 98.29%. If only the first 10 seconds of the recordings were considered, it had an average positive predictive value of 84.62%, a negative predictive value of 93.57%, sensitivity of 52.38%, and specificity of 98.64%. The artificial intelligence model's performance maintained preferable results for emotionally stable cases.Conclusion: Artificial intelligence models can possibly facilitate the judgement of callers' emotional states during dispatch conversations. This model has the potential to be utilised in practice, by pre-screening emotionally stable callers, thus allowing dispatchers to focus on cases that are judged to be emotionally unstable. Further research and validation are required to improve the model's performance and make it suitable for the general population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Dispatchers should be trained to interrogate bystanders with strict protocols to elicit information focused on recognizing cardiac arrest and should provide telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions in all cases of suspected cardiac arrest. While an objective assessment of training outcomes is needed, there is no performance assessment scale for simulated dispatcher-assisted CPR.Study Objective: The aim of the study was to create a valid and reliable performance assessment scale for simulated dispatcher-assisted CPR.Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-centric simulation-based trial (registration number TCTR20210130002), the scale was developed according to the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines 2015 and revised by experts. The performance of 48 dispatchers' telephone-CPR and of 48 bystanders carrying out CPR on a manikin was assessed by two independent evaluators using the scale and using a SkillReporter (PC) software to provide CPR objective performance. Continuous variables were described as mean (SD) and categorical variables as numbers and percentage (%). Comparative analysis between two groups used a Student t-test or a non-parametric test of Mann-Whitney. The internal structure of the scale was evaluated, including internal consistency using α Cronbach coefficient, and reproducibility using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and linear correlation coefficient (R2) calculation.Results: The scale included three different parts: two sections for dispatchers' (32 items) and bystanders' CPR performance (15 items) assessment, and a third part recording times. There was excellent internal consistency (α Cronbach coefficient = 0.77) and reproducibility (ICC = 0.93; R² = 0.86). For dispatchers' performance assessment, α Cronbach coefficient = 0.76; ICC = 0.91; R2 = 0.84. For bystanders' performance assessment, α Cronbach coefficient = 0.75; ICC = 0.93; R2 = 0.87. Reproducibility was excellent for nine items, good for 19 items, and moderate for 19 items. No item had poor reproducibility. There was no significant difference between dispatch doctors' and medical dispatch assistants' performances (33.0 [SD = 4.7] versus 32.3 [SD = 3.2] out of 52, respectively; P = .70) or between trained and untrained bystanders to follow the instructions (14.3 [SD = 2.0] versus 13.9 [SD = 1.8], respectively; P = .64). Objective performance (%) was significantly higher for trained bystanders than for untrained bystanders (67.4 [SD = 14.5] versus 50.6 [SD = 19.3], respectively; P = .03).Conclusion: The scale was valid and reliable to assess performance for simulated dispatcher-assisted CPR. To the authors' knowledge, no other valid performance tool currently exists. It could be used in simulated telephone-CPR training programs to improve performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Little is known about differences in bystander behavior among people who use drugs, trained and untrained in opioid overdose prevention. We examined three types of recommended overdose response – a 911 call, rescue breathing/CPR, and naloxone administration—among Philadelphia-based, predominantly street-involved women with a history of illicit drug use. The study utilized a convergent mixed methods approach integrating data from 186 quantitative survey responses and 38 semi-structured qualitative interviews. Quantitative findings revealed that compared to untrained women, trained women were more likely to administer naloxone (32.9% vs. 5.2%) and use two recommended responses (20.0% vs. 9.5%). No significant differences were found between the two groups in calling 911 or using rescue breathing/CPR. Qualitative findings indicated that barriers to enacting recommended overdose response were either structural or situational and included the avoidance of police, inability to carry naloxone or phone due to unstable housing, and perceived lack of safety on the streets and when interacting with strangers. Our study demonstrated that overdose training improved the frequency of naloxone administration among this sample of predominantly street-involved women. Future efforts need to focus on avoiding intrusive policing, scaling-up naloxone refill sites, and providing secondary naloxone distribution via drug user networks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Fast recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by dispatchers might increase survival. The aim of this observational study of emergency calls was to (1) examine whether a machine learning framework (ML) can increase the proportion of calls recognizing OHCA within the first minute compared with dispatchers, (2) present the performance of ML with different false positive rate (FPR) settings, (3) examine call characteristics influencing OHCA recognition.Methods: ML can be configured with different FPR settings, i.e., more or less inclined to suspect an OHCA depending on the predefined setting. ML OHCA recognition within the first minute is evaluated with a 1.5 FPR as the primary endpoint, and other FPR settings as secondary endpoints. ML was exposed to a random sample of emergency calls from 2018. Voice logs were manually audited to evaluate dispatchers time to recognition.Results: Of 851 OHCA calls, the ML recognized 36% (n = 305) within 1 min compared with 25% (n = 213) by dispatchers. The recognition rate at any time during the call was 86% for ML and 84% for dispatchers, with a median time to recognition of 72 versus 94 s. OHCA recognized by both ML and dispatcher showed a 28 s mean difference in favour of ML (P < 0.001). ML with higher FPR settings reduced recognition times.Conclusion: ML recognized a higher proportion of OHCA within the first minute compared with dispatchers and has the potential to be a supportive tool during emergency calls. The optimal FPR settings need to be evaluated in a prospective study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cardiac arrest is a time-sensitive condition requiring urgent intervention. Prompt and accurate recognition of cardiac arrest by emergency medical dispatchers at the time of the emergency call is a critical early step in cardiac arrest management allowing for initiation of dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR and appropriate and timely emergency response. The overall accuracy of dispatchers in recognizing cardiac arrest is not known. It is also not known if there are specific call characteristics that impact the ability to recognize cardiac arrest.Methods: We performed a systematic review to examine dispatcher recognition of cardiac arrest as well as to identify call characteristics that may affect their ability to recognize cardiac arrest at the time of emergency call. We searched electronic databases for terms related to "emergency medical dispatcher", "cardiac arrest", and "diagnosis", among others, with a focus on studies that allowed for calculating diagnostic test characteristics (e.g. sensitivity and specificity). The review was consistent with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method for evidence evaluation.Results: We screened 2520 article titles, resulting in 47 studies included in this review. There was significant heterogeneity between studies with a high risk of bias in 18 of the 47 which precluded performing meta-analyses. The reported sensitivities for cardiac arrest recognition ranged from 0.46 to 0.98 whereas specificities ranged from 0.32 to 1.00. There were no obvious differences in diagnostic accuracy between different dispatching criteria/algorithms or with the level of education of dispatchers.Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of cardiac arrest recognition at the time of emergency call varied across dispatch centres and did not appear to differ by dispatch algorithm/criteria used or education of the dispatcher, although comparisons were hampered by heterogeneity across studies. Future efforts should focus on ways to improve sensitivity of cardiac arrest recognition to optimize patient care and ensure appropriate and timely resource utilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The defibrillator prompt, which directs callers to retrieve a defibrillator during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, is crucial to the emergency call because it can save lives. We evaluated communicative effectiveness of the prompt instated by the Medical Priority Dispatch System™ Version 13, namely: if there is a defibrillator (AED) available, send someone to get it now, and tell me when you have it.Methods: Using Conversation Analysis and descriptive statistics, we examined linguistic features of the defibrillator sequences (call-taker prompt and caller response) in 208 emergency calls where non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was confirmed by the emergency medical services, and they attempted resuscitation, in the first six months of 2019. Defibrillator sequence durations were measured to determine impact on time to CPR prompt. The proportion of cases where bystanders retrieved defibrillators was also assessed.Results: There was low call-taker adoption of the Medical Priority Dispatch System™ Version 13 prompt (99/208) compared to alternative prompts (86/208) or no prompt (23/208). Caller responses to the Version 13 prompt tended to be longer, more ambiguous or unrelated, and have more instances of repair (utterances to address comprehension trouble). Defibrillators were rarely brought to the scene irrespective of defibrillator prompt utilised.Conclusion: While the Version 13 prompt aims to ensure the use of an available automatic external defibrillator, its effectiveness is undermined by the three-clause composition of the prompt and exclusion of a question structure. We recommend testing of a re-phrased defibrillator prompt in order to maximise comprehension and caller action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Airway management is one of the critically important skills in practicing emergency medicine. However, intubation in the prehospital setting is quite different from those done in controlled environment and still poses significant risks for serious complications. Although checking for clinical findings and end-tidal carbon dioxide detection system (ETCO2) are well-established and widely adopted way to verify ETT placement in the prehospital setting, there are certain situations that the use of these methods could be unreliable. The use of advanced flexible bronchoscopy technology allows us to directly visualize the tube placement and can also assist difficult intubation. Studies have shown that the verification of tube placement utilizing bronchoscopy is an easy and highly reliable methods and this is especially beneficial in the prehospital settings. Although the use of bronchoscopy in prehospital setting currently is somehow limited, this new, rapidly advancing technology and technique is believed to be a game changer in our prehospital intubation/post-intubation practice in the near future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Worldwide, call-taker recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (CA) suffers from poor accuracy, leading to missed opportunities for dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DACPR) in CA patients and inappropriate DACPR in non-CA patients. Diagnostic protocols typically ask 2 questions in sequence: 'Is the patient conscious?' and 'Is the patient breathing normally?' As part of quality improvement efforts, our national emergency medical call centre changed the breathing question to an instruction for callers to place their hand onto the patient's abdomen to evaluate for the presence of breathing.Methods: We performed a prospective before-and-after study of all unconscious cases from the national call centre database over a 31-day period in 2018. Cases were placed in 2 groups: 1) 'Before' group (standard protocol) where call-takers asked 'Is the patient breathing normally?' and 2) 'After' group (modified protocol) where callers were instructed to place their hand on the patient's abdomen. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of both protocols for determining CA were compared.Results: 1557 calls presented with unconsciousness, of which 513 cases were included. 231 cases were in the 'Before' group and 282 cases were in the 'After' group. The 'After' showed superior accuracy (84.4% vs 67.5%), sensitivity (75.0% vs 40.4%) and specificity (87.9% vs 75.4%) when compared to the standard protocol. Adherence in the 'Before' group to the standard protocol was 100%. However, adherence in the 'After' group to the modified protocol was 50.4%. Per protocol analysis comparing the modified protocol with the standard protocol showed vastly improved accuracy (96.5% vs 69.3%), sensitivity (94.1% vs 39.0%) and specificity (97.8% vs 77.2%) of the modified protocol. In patients with true cardiac arrest, the median time to 1st compression was 32.5 s longer in the modified protocol group when compared to the standard protocol group, approaching significance (199.5 s vs 167.0 s, p = 0.059). Median time to recognize CA was similar in both groups.Conclusion: Dispatch assessment using the hand on abdomen method appeared feasible but uptake by dispatch staff was moderate. Diagnostic performance of this method should be verified in randomised trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In 2015, the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) replaced the Medical Priority Dispatch System® (MPDS) with a new, homegrown Los Angeles Tiered Dispatch System (LA-TDS). The objective of this study was to assess the impact of this new dispatch system on telecommunicator-assisted CPR (T-CPR).Methods: This was an interrupted time series study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases where resuscitation was attempted with LAFD 9-1-1 telecommunicators using either MPDS® (January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014) or LA-TDS (January 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015). Trained non-LAFD abstractors listened to all 9-1-1 calls and recorded if T-CPR was initiated, and the elapsed time from the start of the call until key events. The primary outcome was prevalence of T-CPR.Results: Of 1027 calls during the study period, 597 9-1-1 calls met study inclusion/exclusion criteria (including 289 in MPDS cohort, 308 in LA-TDS cohort). The prevalence of T-CPR was significantly greater using LA-TDS (57%) vs. MPDS (43%) (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.3-2.6). The LA-TDS cohort demonstrated a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in time to recognition of cardiac arrest, time to dispatch, and time to first T-CPR chest compression while there was no significant difference in the elapsed time to first description of agonal breathing. For cases where the telecommunicator had the opportunity to assess consciousness and breathing, there was a significant improvement in cardiac arrest recognition in < 1 min, prevalence of T-CPR (p < 0.001), and T-CPR started in <2 min (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Implementation of the new Los Angeles Tiered Dispatch System was associated with decreased time to recognition of cardiac arrest and an increased rate of T-CPR compared to the previously used Medical Priority Dispatch System®. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This study identified clinical nurses' awareness of emergency codes and disaster nursing competencies and investigated the relationships between these variables. Background: Nurses are on the front lines of disaster and emergency response; however, they report not feeling confident about their disaster preparedness. Methods: Participants included 234 nurses working at a general hospital in Korea. Emergency code awareness was measured by recognition of and self‐confidence in eight emergency codes, and disaster nursing competencies were measured using the Disaster Nursing Preparedness Response Competency Scale. Data were collected from 17 to 23 October 2019. Results: The recognition rate of emergency codes was 87.4%, whereas the level of self‐confidence was 3.30 out of 5. Nurses scored 2.98 out of 5 on disaster preparedness competencies and 3.37 out of 5 on disaster response competencies. Emergency code recognition was positively correlated with self‐confidence and disaster nursing competencies (p <.05). Conclusion: Higher recognition of emergency codes among clinical nurses was associated with higher self‐confidence and disaster nursing competencies. Further studies need to develop strategies to improve nurses' awareness and confidence concerning emergency codes. Implications for Nursing Management: Nurse managers should pay attention to provide more opportunities for disaster education to improve nurses' self‐confidence and disaster nursing competencies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Telecommunicator Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (T-CPR) is independently associated with improved survival and improved functional outcome after adult Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA). The objective of this study was to evaluate whether there are racial and socioeconomic disparities in the provision of T-CPR instruction and subsequent CPR performance. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a convenience sample of EMS agencies throughout the United States that utilized the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) dispatch registry during the period 1/2014–12/2017. Data were collected by dispatch agencies after review of 9-1-1 OHCA audio recordings. Elements related to dispatcher CPR instruction, barriers to bystander CPR (BCPR) performance, patient race (White, Black, Hispanic-Latino, or other) and Utstein data were captured from the CARES database. These data were merged with census tract data from incident locations. The effects of race and income (Socioeconomic status, SES) on outcome were analyzed using multilevel logistic regression. Results: A total of 3,807 cases were identified from 37 dispatch agencies in 6 states. The sample was predominantly White (57.5%) and male (64.9%) with an average age of 60.3 ± 19.9. In the adjusted analysis, there were no differences in the odds of receiving CPR instruction by race (black vs white), OR = 0.96 (95% CI. 0.70, 1.32) or for increased income, (OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99, 1.02). There was a significant difference in receipt of T-CPR instruction by patient age, OR = 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98, 0.99). Subsequent utilization of T-CPR instruction to perform BCPR was less likely for patients that had a lower income, OR = 1.03 (95% CI 1.01, 1.05). There was also a decreased rate of BCPR provision by patient age OR = 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99, 1.00), but there was no difference in rate of BCPR provision by race, OR = 0.86 (95% CI 0.61, 1.23). Conclusion: We identified differences in age but not race or SES in the provision of T-CPR instruction by dispatch centers. We also identified decreased CPR provision by age and income after receipt of T-CPR instructions. In this sample, we found no evidence of racial disparities in the provision of T-CPR instruction or subsequent provision of BCPR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major cause of mortality in developing countries such as India. Most cardiac arrests happen outside the hospital and are associated with poor survival rates due to delay in recognition and in performing early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Community CPR training and telephone CPR (T-CPR) in the dispatch centers have been shown to increase bystander CPR rates and survival. Objectives: The aim of this study is to identify the significance of T-CPR in OHCA and to discuss its implementation in the health system to improve OHCA outcomes in India. Materials and Methods: A descriptive research study methodology was adopted following a literature search. Results: The search criterion "Cardiovascular diseases" resulted in 162, "Out-side hospital cardiac arrest" in 50; For a comprehensive overview, these publications were evaluated looking for data on T-CPR incidence, criteria for detecting OHCA by emergency medical dispatchers, sensitivity and specificity, and BCPR. Conclusion: This current research stresses the scale and seriousness of the implementation of T-CPR in OHCA in India. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The objective of this study was to test if caller descriptions of chief complaint delays emergency medical dispatchers' (EMDs) recognition of the need for telephone-assisted CPR (T-CPR).Methods: We conducted an analysis of N = 433 cardiac arrest calls from six large call centers in the United States. Calls were abstracted for initial chief complaint description: caller reports (1) correct medical condition (CMC); (2) incorrect medical condition (IMC), or (3) signs/symptoms only (SS), as well the time interval between call pickup and recognition of the need for T-CPR. In addition, we abstracted if EMDs asked questions related to the caller's chief complaint (rather than, or before), asking about patients' consciousness and breathing status.Results: The majority of cardiac arrest calls (60%) were reported as SS. Median time to recognition of the need for T-CPR was 64 s for SS chief complaints, 47 s for CMC chief complaints, and 100 s for IMC chief complaints. EMDs pursued chief complaint descriptions for 9% of the calls with SS chief complaints, 41% of the calls with IMC chief complaints, and 19% of the calls with CMC chief complaints. Median time to recognition of the need for CPR for calls in which the chief complaint description was pursued was 166 s compared to 62 s for calls in which the chief complaint description was not pursued.Conclusion: Caller chief complaint description affects the time to recognition of the need for T-CPR.Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Trial # NCT01972087. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The detection of cardiac arrests by dispatchers allows telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (t-CPR) and improves Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) survival. To enhance the OHCA detection rate, in 2012, the Paris Fire Brigade dispatch center created an original technique called "Hand On Belly" (HoB). The new algorithm that resulted has become a central point in a broader program for dispatch-assisted cardiac arrests.Methods: This is a repeated cross-sectional study with retrospective data of four 15-day call samples recorded from 2012 to 2018. We included all calls from OHCAs cared for by Basic Life Support (BLS) teams and excluded calls where the dispatcher was not in contact directly with a witness. The primary endpoint was the successful detection of an OHCA by the dispatcher; the secondary endpoints were successful t-CPR and measurements of the different time intervals related to the call. Logistic regressions were performed to assess parameters associated with detecting OHCAs and initiating t-CPR.Results: From 2012 to 2018, among the detectable OCHAs, the proportion correctly identified increased from 54% to 93%; the rate of t-CPRs from 51% to 84%. OHCA detection and t-CPR initiation were both associated with HoB breathing assessments (adjustedOR: 89, 95%CI: 31-299, and adjustedOR: 11.2, 95%CI: 1.4-149, respectively). Over the study period, the times to answering calls and the time to sending BLS teams were shorter than those recommended by international guidelines; however, the times to OHCA recognition and starting t-CPR delivery were longer.Conclusions: The HoB effectively facilitated OHCA detection in our system, which has achieved very high performance levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Widespread use of smartphones allows automatic geolocalization (i.e., transmission of location data) in countless apps. Until now, this technology has not been routinely used in connection with an emergency call in which location data play a decisive role This study evaluated a new software automatically providing emergency medical service (EMS) dispatchers with a caller's geolocation. We hypothesized that this technology will provide higher accuracy, faster dispatching of EMS and a faster beginning of thoracic compressions in a cardiac arrest scenario.Material and Methods: Approval from the local Ethics Committee was obtained. 108 simulated emergency calls reporting a patient in cardiac arrest were conducted at 54 metropolitan locations, which were chosen according to a realistic pattern. At each location, a conventional emergency call, with an oral description of the location, was given first; subsequently, another call using an app with automatic geolocation was placed. Accuracy of localization, time to location, time to EMS dispatch and time to first thoracic compression were compared between both groups.Results: The conventional emergency call was always successful (n = 54). Emergency call via app worked successfully in n = 46 cases (85.2%). Automatic geolocation was provided to EMS in all these n = 46 cases (100%). Deviation from estimated position to actual position was 1173.5 ± 4343.1 m for conventional and 65.6 ± 320.5 m for automatic geolocalization (p < 0.001). In addition, time to localization was significantly shorter using automatic geolocalization (34.7 vs. 71.7 s, p < 0.001). Time to first thoracic compression was significantly faster in the geolocalization group (83.0 vs. 122.6 s; p < 0.001).Conclusions: This pilot study showed that automatic geolocalization leads to a significantly shorter duration of the emergency call, significantly shorter times until the beginning of thoracic compressions, and a higher precision in determining the location of an emergency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To describe the barriers to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiation and continuation in emergency calls for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We analysed 295 consecutive emergency calls relating to OHCA over a four-month period (1 January – 30 April 2021). Calls included were paramedic-confirmed, non-traumatic, non-EMS-witnessed OHCA, where the caller was with the patient. Calls were listened to in full and coded in terms of barriers to CPR initiation and continuation, and patient and caller characteristics. Overall, CPR was performed in 69% of calls and, in 85% of these, callers continued performing CPR until EMS arrival. Nearly all callers (99%) experienced barriers to CPR initiation and/or continuation during the call. The barriers identified were classified into eight categories: reluctance, appropriateness, emotion, bystander physical ability, patient access, leaving the scene, communication failure, caller actions and call-taker instructions. Of these, bystander physical ability was the most prevalent barrier to both CPR initiation and continuation, occurring in 191 (65%) calls, followed by communication failure which occurred in 160 (54%) calls. Callers stopping or interrupting CPR performance due to being fatigued was lower than expected (n = 54, 26% of callers who performed CPR). Barriers to CPR initiation that related to bystander physical ability, caller actions, communication failure, emotion, leaving the scene, patient access, procedural barriers, and reluctance were mostly overcome by the caller (i.e., CPR was performed). Barriers to CPR initiation and continuation were commonly experienced by callers, however they were frequently overcome. Future research should investigate the strategies that were successful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Many dispatch systems send Advanced Life Support (ALS) resources to patients complaining of abdominal pain even though the majority of these incidents require only Basic Life Support (BLS). With increasing 911-call volume, resource utilization has become more important to ensure that ALS resources are available for time-critical emergencies. In 2015, a large, urban fire department implemented an internally developed, tiered-dispatch system. Under this system, patients reporting a chief complaint of abdominal pain received the closest BLS ambulance dispatched alone emergency if located within three miles of the incident. The objective of this study was to determine the safety of BLS-only dispatch to abdominal pain by determining the frequency of time-sensitive events. Methods: This was a retrospective review of electronic health records of one emergency medical service provider agency from May 2015-2018. Inclusion criteria were a chief complaint of abdominal pain from a first- or second-party caller, age over 15, and the patient was reported to be alert and breathing normally. The primary outcome was the prevalence of time-sensitive events, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defibrillation, or airway management. Secondary outcomes were hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg); or a prehospital 12 lead-electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrating ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria or a wide complex arrhythmia. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: During the study period, there were 1,220,820 EMS incidents, of which 33,267 (2.72%) met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 49.9 years (range 16-111, standard deviation [SD] 19.6); 14,556 patients (56.2%) were female. Time-sensitive events occurred in seven cases (0.021%), mean age was 75.3 years (range 30-86, SD18.7); 85.7% were female. Airway management was required in seven cases (0.021%), CPR in six cases (0.018%), and defibrillation in one case (0.003%). Two of the seven (28.6%) cases involved dispatch protocol deviations. Hypotension was present in 240 (0.72%) cases; six (0.018%) cases had 12-lead ECGs meeting STEMI criteria; and no cases demonstrated wide complex arrhythmia. Conclusion: Among adult 911 patients with a dispatch chief complaint of abdominal pain, time-sensitive events were exceedingly rare. Dispatching a BLS ambulance alone appears to be safe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of automatic external defibrillator (AED) retrieval and placement by bystander callers when prompted by an Emergency Medical Dispatcher (EMD). Methods: This retrospective descriptive study utilized a convenience sample of emergency dispatch data collected from 23 Emergency Communication Centers (ECCs) spanning 14 states across the United States (U.S.) from July 11, 2014 to August 13, 2018, including all cases in which the EMD recorded any response to the AED availability prompt. Data were collected using ProQA, the software version of the Medical Priority Dispatch System. Primary outcome measures were (a) distribution of responses to the AED prompt; (b) percentage of cases in which an AED was retrieved; and (c) percentage of cases in which AED pads were placed by the bystander-caller. Results: A total of 2,200,285 cases were collected during the study period, in 18,904 (0.86%) of which the AED prompt was displayed (indicating suspected out of hospital cardiac arrest, or OHCA). Overall, an AED was reported as available 5.8% (n = 1,091) of the time the EMD recorded an answer to the AED prompt. In multiple-rescuer situations, a rescuer was sent to get the AED 2.8% (n = 523) of the time, as opposed to only 0.30% (n = 56) for single-rescuer calls. The AED was reported to be already on scene, by the patient, in 2.7% (n = 512) of the cases. A majority (72.0%; n = 417) of the time, rescuers who were sent to get an AED were unable to retrieve it, with single rescuers being successful more often (57.1% unable to retrieve, vs 73.6% for multiple rescuers). Conclusions: AEDs are reported as available by only a small percentage of callers to 911, and in the majority of cases in which a bystander rescuer is sent to retrieve an AED, one is never located or used. Sending someone to retrieve the AED may be more appropriate in multiple-rescuer situations than when a single bystander rescuer is alone on scene. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In emergency ambulance calls, agonal breathing remains a barrier to the recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and rapid dispatch. We aimed to explore whether the language used by callers to describe breathing had an impact on call-taker recognition of agonal breathing and hence cardiac arrest.Methods: We analysed 176 calls of paramedic-confirmed OHCA, stratified by recognition of OHCA (89 cases recognised, 87 cases not recognised). We investigated the linguistic features of callers' response to the question "is s/he breathing?" and examined the impact on subsequent coding by call-takers.Results: Among all cases (recognised and non-recognised), 64% (113/176) of callers said that the patients were breathing (yes-answers). We identified two categories of yes-answers: 56% (63/113) were plain answers, confirming that the patient was breathing ("he's breathing"); and 44% (50/113) were qualified answers, containing additional information ("yes but gasping"). Qualified yes-answers were suggestive of agonal breathing. Yet these answers were often not pursued and most (32/50) of these calls were not recognised as OHCA at dispatch.Conclusion: There is potential for improved recognition of agonal breathing if call-takers are trained to be alert to any qualification following a confirmation that the patient is breathing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of simulation training, using actors to make mock calls, on improving Emergency Medical Dispatchers' (EMDs) ability to recognize the need for, and reduce the time to, telephone-assisted CPR (T-CPR) in simulated and real cardiac arrest 9-1-1 calls.Methods: We conducted a parallel prospective randomized controlled trial with n=157 EMDs from thirteen 9-1-1 call centers. Study participants were randomized within each center to intervention (i.e., completing 4 simulation training sessions over 12-months) or control (status quo). After the intervention period, performance on 9 call processing skills and 2 time-intervals were measured in 2 simulation assessment calls for both arms. Six of the 13 call centers provided recordings of real cardiac arrest calls taken by study participants during the study period.Results: Of the N=128 EMDs who completed the simulation assessment, intervention participants (n=66) performed significantly better on 6 of 9 call processing skills and started T-CPR 23s faster (73 vs 91s respectively, p<0.001) compared to participants in the control arm (n=62). In real cardiac arrest calls, EMDs who completed 3 or 4 training sessions were more likely to recognize the need for T-CPR for more challenging cardiac arrest calls than EMDs who completed fewer than 3, including controls who completed no training (68% vs 53%, p=0.018).Conclusions: Simulation training improves call processing skills and reduces time to T-CPR in simulated call scenarios, and may improve the recognition of the need for T-CPR in more challenging real-life cardiac arrest calls.Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Trial # NCT01972087. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clear and efficient communication between emergency caller and call-taker is crucial to timely ambulance dispatch. We aimed to explore the impact of linguistic variation in the delivery of the prompt "okay, tell me exactly what happened" on the way callers describe the emergency in the Medical Priority Dispatch System®.Methods: We analysed 188 emergency calls for cases of paramedic-confirmed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We investigated the linguistic features of the prompt "okay, tell me exactly what happened" in relation to the format (report vs. narrative) of the caller's response. In addition, we compared calls with report vs. narrative responses in the length of response and time to dispatch.Results: Callers were more likely to respond with a report format when call-takers used the present perfect ("what's happened") rather than the simple past ("what happened") (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 4.07; 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 2.05-8.28, p<0.001). Reports were significantly shorter than narrative responses (9s vs. 18s, p<0.001), and were associated with less time to dispatch (50s vs. 58s, p=0.002).Conclusion: These results suggest that linguistic variations in the way the scripted sentences of a protocol are delivered can have an impact on the efficiency with which call-takers process emergency calls. A better understanding of interactional dynamics between caller and call-taker may translate into improvements of dispatch performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most out-of-hospital paediatric cardiac arrests (CA) are not identified until a call is made to the emergency medical services. Accurate identification increases overall survival by enabling immediate ambulance dispatch and delivery of bystander CPR. European ambulance services use a variety of didactic telephone scripts to interrogate the caller and rapidly identify paediatric CA. The performance of these scripts has not been reported. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the NHS Pathways as a telephone triage tool to identify patients less than 16 years age in cardiac arrest.Methods: All emergency calls to South Central Ambulance Service (SCAS) over a 12-month period screened by 'NHS Pathways' v9.04 were identified. All actual or presumed paediatric CAs (<16 years age) identified by the emergency call taker were cross-referenced with the ambulance crew's Patient Report Form to identify all confirmed CAs.Results: Over a 12-month period from March 2015, a total of 540,715 emergency calls were received by SCAS, of which 53,213 related to children, 2052 (3.86%) being categorised by 'NHS Pathways' as paediatric CA. On arrival of the ambulance crew, only 87/2052 (4.24%) patients were in CA. Sensitivity=71.3%; specificity=96.3%; positive predictive value=4.2%. NHS Pathways missed the CA in 28.7% cases.Conclusions: This is the first reported evaluation of any currently used European paediatric telephone triage system for identifying CA. Further work is required to refine telephone triage pathways for paediatric cardiac arrest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: 9-1-1 callers often face barriers preventing them from starting Telephone CPR (TCPR). The most common problem is getting patients to a hard, flat surface. This study describes barriers callers report when trying to move patients to a hard, flat surface and assesses conditions associated with overcoming these barriers.Methods: We audited 2396 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) audio recordings. A barrier was defined as any statement by the caller that the rescuer could not move the patient to the ground and into a supine position. Barriers were recorded and TCPR process metrics compared across the barrier and non-barrier groups.Results: There were 802 OHCAs in the study group. Roughly 26% had a barrier. Telecommunicators were less likely to start TCPR instructions in the barrier group than in the non-barrier group (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45-0.88; p=0.007). Telecommunicator-directed bystander chest compressions were more than twice as likely to start in the non-barrier group (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.6-3.2; p<0.001). Median time to first compression was longer in the barrier group (276s vs 171s; p<0.001). Rescuers were 3.7 times more likely to overcome a barrier and start compressions (OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 2.0-6.8; p<0.001) when multiple bystanders were present.Conclusion: Inability to move patients to a hard, flat surface is associated with a reduced rate of TCPR and increased time to first compression. Assessing the conditions under which such barriers are overcome is important for telecommunicator training and can help improve rates and timeliness of TCPR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Initiation of early bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) depends on bystanders' or medical dispatchers' recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The primary aim of our study was to investigate if OHCA recognition during the emergency call was associated with bystander CPR, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and 30-day survival. Our secondary aim was to identify patient-, setting-, and dispatcher-related predictors of OHCA recognition.Methods: We performed an observational study of all OHCA patients' emergency calls in the Capital Region of Denmark from 01/01/2013-31/12/2013. OHCAs were collected from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry and the Mobile Critical Care Unit database. Emergency call recordings were identified and evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied to all OHCAs and witnessed OHCAs only to analyse the association between OHCA recognition and bystander CPR, ROSC, and 30-day survival. Univariable logistic regression analyses were applied to identify predictors of OHCA recognition.Results: We included 779 emergency calls in the analyses. During the emergency calls, 70.1% (n=534) of OHCAs were recognised; OHCA recognition was positively associated with bystander CPR (odds ratio [OR]=7.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.10-12.05) in all OHCAs; and ROSC (OR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.13-3.06) and 30-day survival (OR=2.80, 95% CI: 1.58-4.96) in witnessed OHCA. Predictors of OHCA recognition were addressing breathing (OR=1.76, 95% CI: 1.17-2.66) and callers located by the patient's side (OR=2.16, 95% CI: 1.46-3.19).Conclusions: Recognition of OHCA during emergency calls was positively associated with the provision of bystander CPR, ROSC, and 30-day survival in witnessed OHCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Spanish-only speaking residents in the United States face barriers to receiving potentially life-saving 911 interventions such as Telephone -cardiopulmonary resuscitation (TCPR) instructions. Since 2015, 911 dispatchers have placed an increased emphasis on rapid identification of potential cardiac arrest. The purpose of this study was to describe the utilization and timing of the 911 system during suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by Spanish-speaking callers in Metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona.Methods: The dataset consisted of suspected OHCA from 911 centers from October 10, 2010 through December 31, 2013. Review of audio TCPR process data included whether the need for CPR was recognized by telecommunicators, whether CPR instructions were provided, and the time elements from call receipt to initiation of compressions.Results: A total of 3398 calls were made to 911 for suspected OHCA where CPR was indicated. A total of 39 (1.2%) were determined to have a Spanish language barrier. This averages to 18 calls per year with a Spanish language barrier during the study period, compared with 286 OHCAs expected per year among this population. The average time until telecommunicators recognized CPR need was 87.4s for the no language barrier group compared to 160.6s for the Spanish-language barrier group (p<0.001).Time to CPR instructions started was significantly different between these groups (144.4s vs 231.3s, respectively) (p<0.001), as was time to first compression, (174.4s vs. 290.9s, respectively) (p<0.001).Conclusions: Our study suggests that Hispanic callers under-utilize the 911 system, and when they do call 911, there are significant delays in initiating CPR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: We compared the time to initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by lay responders and/or first responders alerted either via Short Message Service (SMS) or by using a mobile application-based alert system (APP).Methods: The Ticino Registry of Cardiac Arrest collects all data about out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) occurring in the Canton of Ticino. At the time of a bystander's call, the EMS dispatcher sends one ambulance and alerts the first-responders network made up of police officers or fire brigade equipped with an automatic external defibrillator, the so called "traditional" first responders, and - if the scene was considered safe - lay responders as well. We evaluated the time from call to arrival of traditional first responders and/or lay responders when alerted either via SMS or the new developed mobile APP.Results: Over the study period 593 OHCAs have occurred. Notification to the first responders network was sent via SMS in 198 cases and via mobile APP in 134 cases. Median time to first responder/lay responder arrival on scene was significantly reduced by the APP-based system (3.5 [2.8-5.2]) compared to the SMS-based system (5.6 [4.2-8.5] min, p 0.0001). The proportion of lay responders arriving first on the scene significantly increased (70% vs. 15%, p<0.01) with the APP. Earlier arrival of a first responder or of a lay responder determined a higher survival rate.Conclusions: The mobile APP system is highly efficient in the recruitment of first responders, significantly reducing the time to the initiation of CPR thus increasing survival rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Recognition of cardiac arrest and prompt activation time by emergency medical dispatch are key process measures that have been associated with improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The aim of this study is to improve recognition of OHCA and time to initiation of telephone assisted chest compressions in an emergency medical communication centre (EMCC).Methods: A prospective, interventional study implementing targeted interventions in an EMCC. Interventions included: (1) lectures focusing on agonal breathing and interrogation strategy (2) simulation training (3) structured dispatcher feedback (4) web-based telephone assisted CPR training program. All ambulance-confirmed OHCA calls in the study period were assessed and relevant process and result measures were recorded pre- and post-intervention. Cardiac arrest was reported as (1) recognised, (2) not recognised or (3) delayed recognition.Results: We included 331 and 230 calls pre- and post-intervention, respectively. Recognition of cardiac arrest improved significantly after intervention (89 vs. 95%, p=0.024). Delayed recognition was significantly reduced (21 vs. 6%, p>0.001), as was misinterpretation of agonal breathing (25 vs. 10%, p<0.001). Telephone assisted compressions increased (71% vs. 83%, p=0.002) whereas bystander performed ventilations decreased after intervention (23% vs. 15%, p=0.016). Time intervals for initiation of chest compression instructions (2.6 vs. 2.3min, p=0.042) and delivery of telephone assisted chest compressions (3.3 vs. 2.8min, p=0.015) were significantly shortened after intervention.Conclusion: Targeted simulation, education and feedback significantly improved recognition of OHCA and reduced time to first chest compression. Continuous measurement of key quality metrics can facilitate development of targeted education and training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Emergency dispatchers use protocols to instruct bystanders in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Studies changing one element in the dispatcher's protocol report improved CPR quality. Whether several changes interact is unknown and the effect of combining multiple changes previously reported to improve CPR quality into one protocol remains to be investigated. We hypothesize that a novel dispatch protocol, combining multiple beneficial elements improves CPR quality compared with a standard protocol.Methods: A novel dispatch protocol was designed including wording on chest compressions, using a metronome, regular encouragements and a 10-s rest each minute. In a simulated cardiac arrest scenario, laypersons were randomized to perform single-rescuer CPR guided with the novel or the standard protocol.Primary Outcome: a composite endpoint of time to first compression, hand position, compression depth and rate and hands-off time (maximum score: 22 points). Afterwards participants answered a questionnaire evaluating the dispatcher assistance.Results: The novel protocol (n=61) improved CPR quality score compared with the standard protocol (n=64) (mean (SD): 18.6 (1.4)) points vs. 17.5 (1.7) points, p<0.001. The novel protocol resulted in deeper chest compressions (mean (SD): 58 (12)mm vs. 52 (13)mm, p=0.02) and improved rate of correct hand position (61% vs. 36%, p=0.01) compared with the standard protocol. In both protocols hands-off time was short. The novel protocol improved motivation among rescuers compared with the standard protocol (p=0.002).Conclusions: Participants guided with a standard dispatch protocol performed high quality CPR. A novel bundle of care protocol improved CPR quality score and motivation among rescuers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Explore, understand and address issues that impact upon timely and adequate allocation of prehospital medical assistance and resources to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients.Methods: Mixed-methods design obtaining data for one year in three emergency medical communication centres (EMCC); Oslo-Akershus (OA), Vestfold-Telemark (VT) and Østfold (Ø). Data collection included quantitative data from analysis of dispatch logs, ambulance records and audio files. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews and non-participant observations.Results: OA-, VT- and Ø-EMCC responded to 1095 OHCAs and 579 of these calls were included for further analysis (333, 143 and 103, respectively). There were significant site differences in their recognition of OHCA (89, 94 and 78%, respectively, p<0.001), provision of CPR instructions (83, 83 and 61%, respectively, p<0.001), time from call answered to initial CPR instructions (1.4min (1.2, 1.6), 1.1min (0,9, 1.2) and 1.3 (1.2, 1.7) respectively, p=0.002). The most frequent reason for delayed or failed recognition of OHCA was misinterpretation of agonal breathing. Interviews and observations revealed individual differences in protocol use, interrogation strategy and assessment of breathing. Use of protocol was only part of decision making, dispatchers trusted their own clinical experience and intuition, and used assumptions about the patient and the situation as part of decision making.Conclusion: Agonal breathing continues to be the main barrier to recognition of cardiac arrest. Individual differences among dispatchers' strategies can directly impact on performance, mainly due to the wide definition of cardiac arrest and lack of uniform tools for assessment of breathing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains low. Early recognition by emergency medical dispatchers is essential for an effective chain of actions, leading to early cardiopulmonary resuscitation, use of an automated external defibrillator and rapid dispatching of the emergency medical services.Aim: To analyse and compare the accuracy of OHCA recognition by medical dispatchers in two countries.Method: An observational register-based study collecting data from national cardiac arrest registers in Denmark and Sweden during a six-month period in 2013. Data were analysed in two steps; registry data were merged with electronically registered emergency call data from the emergency medical dispatch centres in the two regions. Cases with missing or non-OHCA dispatch codes were analysed further by auditing emergency call recordings using a uniform data collection template.Results: The sensitivity for recognition of OHCA was 40.9% (95% CI: 37.1-44.7%) in the Capital Region of Denmark and 78.4% (95% CI: 73.2-83.0%) in the Skåne Region in Sweden (p<0.001). With additional data from the emergency call recordings, the sensitivity was 80.7% (95% CI: 77.7-84.3%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 81.3-89.8%) for the two regions (p=0.06). The majority of the non-recognised OHCA were dispatched with the highest priority.Conclusion: The accuracy of OHCA recognition was high and comparable. We identified large differences in data registration practices despite the use of similar dispatch tools. This raises a discussion of definitions and transparency in general in scientific reporting of OHCA recognition, which is essential if used as quality indicator in emergency medical services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) requires prompt intervention. Better outcomes are associated with briefer time from dispatch of emergency medical services (EMS) providers to arrival on scene, application of a defibrillator or insertion of an advanced airway. We assessed whether time from receipt of a call by a telecommunicator to dispatch of EMS providers was associated with outcomes.Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study of persons who had OHCA treated by EMS providers in Seattle, WA. Activation interval was defined as time from call pick up by telecommunicator to notification of EMS providers to respond to the call. Response interval was defined as the time from notification of EMS providers to their arrival at patient side. We determined the association between time intervals and outcomes of sustained restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge and neurologically favorable survival using multiple logistic regression. Secondary analyses assessed the relative contribution of activation versus response interval, and adjusted for post-treatment patient and EMS characteristics.Results: Among 2,687 patients, activation interval was mean 1.2±0.6min. Response interval was mean 6.1±2.4min. 1,232 (45.9%) achieved ROSC; 475 (17.7%) survived to discharge; and 428 (15.9%) had favorable neurologic status at discharge. Compared to an activation interval of at least 1.5min, patients with briefer intervals were more likely to survive to discharge (adjusted odds ratio (OR) for <1min, 1.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.26, 2.28); adjusted odds ratio for 1 to 1.49min, 1.54 (95% CI, 1.14, 2.08); p value=0.002). With baseline survival of 10%, the absolute increase in survival associated with a 30s decrease in activation interval was 0.7% and for a 30s decrease in response interval was 0.4%.Conclusions: Briefer activation interval was independently associated with greater survival. Further research is needed to assess whether reduction of the activation interval improves outcome after OHCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the impacts of emergency calls made using mobile phones on the quality of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) that were not witnessed by emergency medical service (EMS).Methods: In this prospective study, we collected data for 2530 DA-CPR-attempted medical emergency cases (517 using mobile phones and 2013 using landline phones) and 2980 non-EMS-witnessed OHCAs (600 using mobile phones and 2380 using landline phones). Time factors and quality of DA-CPR, backgrounds of callers and outcomes of OHCAs were compared between mobile and landline phone groups.Results: Emergency calls are much more frequently placed beside the arrest victim in mobile phone group (52.7% vs. 17.2%). The positive predictive value and acceptance rate of DA-CPR in mobile phone group (84.7% and 80.6%, respectively) were significantly higher than those in landline group (79.2% and 70.9%). The proportion of good-quality bystander CPR in mobile phone group was significantly higher than that in landline group (53.5% vs. 45.0%). When analysed for all non-EMS-witnessed OHCAs, rates of 1-month survival and 1-year neurologically favourable survival in mobile phone group (7.8% and 3.5%, respectively) were higher than those in landline phone group (4.6% and 1.9%; p<0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis, including other backgrounds, revealed that mobile phone calls were associated with increased 1-month survival in the subgroup of OHCAs receiving bystander CPR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.15-2.92).Conclusion: Emergency calls made using mobile phones are likely to augment the survival from OHCAs by improving DA-CPR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Early use of automated external defibrillators (AED) increases survival in cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Dispatchers play important roles in identifying OHCA, dispatching ambulances and providing callers with telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Guidelines recommend that AED registries be linked to dispatch centres as tools to refer callers to nearby AED.Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent dispatchers, when provided with a tool to display AED locations and accessibility, referred callers to nearby AED.Methods: An application providing real-time visualization of AED locations and accessibility was implemented at four dispatch centres in Sweden. Dispatchers were instructed to refer callers to nearby AED when OHCA was suspected. Such cases were prospectively collected, and geographic information systems were used to identify those located ≤100m from an AED. Audio recordings of emergency calls were assessed to evaluate the AED referral rate.Results: Between February and August 2014, 3009 suspected OHCA calls were received. In 6.6% of those calls (200/3009), an AED was ≤100m from the suspected OHCA. The AED was accessible and the caller was not alone on scene in 24% (47/200) of these cases. In two of those 47 cases (4.3%), the dispatcher referred the caller to the AED.Conclusion: Despite a tool for dispatchers to refer callers to a nearby AED, referral was rare. Only a minority of the suspected OHCA cases occurred ≤100m from an AED. We identified AED accessibility and callers being alone on scene as obstacles for AED referral. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The two most commonly used dispatch tools are medical priority dispatch (MPD) and criteria based dispatch (CBD), but there are countries still using non-standardized emergency call processing. We compared selected characteristics of DA-CPR before and after implementation of a standardized protocol in a non-MPD and non-CBD system.Methods: Observational study of DA-CPR recordings during 4-month periods before (PER1) and after (PER2) the standardized protocol had been implemented. Selected performance characteristics included times to event verification, identification of cardiac arrest, DA-CPR instructions, and first chest compression, which were compared between PER1 and PER2. The secondary goal was to compare survival to hospital discharge.Results: A total of 152 call recordings with DA-CPR were evaluated in PER1 and 174 in PER2. Median times to cardiac arrest recognition were 46s in PER1 and 37s in PER2 (p=0.002), to first compression 2min 35s in PER1 and 2min 25s in PER2 (p=0.549). Admission to hospital with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved in 39 patients (31.9%) in PER1 and 57 (45.6%) in PER2 (p<0.05), discharge from hospital (CPC 1-2) in 9.0% and 14.4% patients in PER1 and PER2, respectively. If ventricular fibrillation was the initial rhythm, survival rate (CPC 1-2) was 32.3% in PER1 and 38.7% in PER2 (p=0.523).Conclusion: Implementation of a standardized DA-CPR protocol resulted in faster identification of cardiac arrest, response team dispatching and arrival at scene. These factors were associated with a trend to better survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) is effective in increasing bystander CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). Singapore has recently implemented a DA-CPR program. We aimed to characterize barriers to commencement of chest compressions by callers in Singapore.Methods: We analyzed dispatch recordings of OHCA cases received by the ambulance call center between July 2012 and March 2015. Audio recordings of poor quality were excluded. Trained reviewers noted the sequential stages of the dispatcher's recognition of CPR, delivering CPR instructions and caller performing CPR. Time taken to reach these milestones was noted. Barriers to chest compressions were identified.Results: A total of 4897 OHCA occurred during the study period, overall bystander CPR rate was 45.7%. 1885 dispatch recordings were reviewed with 1157 cases qualified for dispatcher CPR. In 1128 (97.5%) cases, the dispatcher correctly recognized the need for CPR. CPR instructions were delivered in 1056 (91.3%) cases. Of these, 1007 (87.0%) callers performed CPR to instruction. One or more barriers to chest compressions were identified in 430 (37.2%) cases. The commonest barrier identified was "could not move patient" (27%). Cases where barriers were identified were less likely to have the need for CPR recognized by the dispatcher (94.9% vs. 99.0%, p<0.001), CPR instructions given (79.3% vs. 98.3%, p<0.001) and CPR started (67.9% vs. 98.3%, p<0.001), while the time taken to reach each of these stages were significantly longer (p<0.001).Conclusion: Barriers were present in 37% of cases. They were associated with lower proportion of CPR started and longer delay to CPR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: 9-1-1 dispatchers are often the first contact for bystanders witnessing an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In the time before Emergency Medical Services arrives, dispatcher identification of the need for, and provision of Telephone-CPR (T-CPR) can improve survival. Our study aims to evaluate the use of phone-based standardized patient simulation training to improve identification of the need for T-CPR and shorten time to start of T-CPR instructions.Methods/design: The STAT-911 study is a randomized controlled trial. We will recruit 160 dispatchers from 9-1-1 call-centers in the Pacific Northwest; they are randomized to an intervention or control group. Intervention participants complete four telephone simulation training sessions over 6-8 months. Training sessions consist of three mock 9-1-1 calls, with a standardized patient playing a caller witnessing a medical emergency. After the mock calls, an instructor who has been listening in and scoring the dispatcher's call management, connects to the dispatcher and provides feedback on select call processing skills. After the last training session, all participants complete the simulation test: a call session that includes two mock 9-1-1 calls of medium complexity. During the study, audio from all actual cardiac arrest calls handled by the dispatchers will be collected. All dispatchers complete a baseline survey, and after the intervention, a follow-up survey to measure confidence. Primary outcomes are proportion of calls where dispatchers identify the need for T-CPR, and time to start of T-CPR, assessed by comparing performance on two calls in the simulation test. Secondary outcomes are proportion of actual cardiac arrest calls in which dispatchers identify the need for T-CPR and time to start of T-CPR; performance on call-taking skills during the simulation test; self-reported confidence in the baseline and follow-up surveys; and calculated costs of the intervention training sessions and projected costs for field implementation of training sessions.Discussion: The STAT-911 study will evaluate if over-the-phone simulation training with standardized patients can improve 9-1-1 dispatchers' ability identify the need for, and promptly begin T-CPR. Furthermore, it will advance knowledge on the effectiveness of simulation training for health services phone-operators interacting with clients, patients, or bystanders in diagnosis, triage, and treatment decisions.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.govRegistration Number: NCT01972087 . Registered 23 October 2013. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Despite recent efforts, most people are not trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), which has a major impact on survival following cardiac arrest (CA). We have set up a dispatcher-assisted CPR protocol at our call centre, based on international guidelines issued in 2010. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of this protocol on CA diagnosis and quantity of recommendations given by telephone dispatchers to untrained witnesses. Methods: We performed a 'before and after' monocentric observational study. Data were compared before and a short time after (2 months) implementation of the protocol. We included patients presenting as an out-of-hospital CA in the presence of a witness untrained in CPR. Fisher's test was used to compare periods. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: During the 8 month period before the protocol, 115 victims were potentially eligible for CPR. Diagnosis was achieved in 63.5% of cases and CPR recommendations given in 6.1%. After implementation of the protocol, 130 victims were potentially eligible for CPR. Frequency of CA diagnosis was significantly higher after the protocol with 76% of cases (P = 0.0359). Frequency of CPR recommendations given to witnesses was also significantly higher after the protocol, with a fivefold increase up to 29.2% (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Implementation of a dispatcher-assisted CPR protocol was efficient in improving both CA diagnosis and CPR recommendations given to untrained witnesses for out-of-hospital CA with a very short time of dispatcher training. It is a simple and efficacious measure, at no additional cost and with the promises of improving prognosis following cardiac arrest in a centre not equipped with computerised dispatcher support programmes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the advantages of understanding the interaction among layperson cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training, telecommunicator-CPR, and frequency of bystander-CPR delivery. Topics improving the survival of persons effected from cardiac arrest; improving quality of life of the patients; and educating and training people about CPR.

Background: A preceding randomized controlled trial demonstrated that chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instruction by dispatcher was more effective to increase bystander CPR than conventional CPR instruction. However, the actual condition of implementation of each type of dispatcher instruction (chest compression-only CPR [CCCPR] or conventional CPR with rescue breathing) and provision of bystander CPR in real prehospital settings has not been sufficiently investigated.Methods: This registry prospectively enrolled patients aged =>18 years suffering an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of non-traumatic causes before emergency-medical-service (EMS) arrival, who were considered as target subjects of dispatcher instruction, resuscitated by EMS personnel, and transported to medical institutions in Osaka, Japan from January 2005 through December 2012. The primary outcome measure was provision of CPR by a bystander. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors that were potentially associated with provision of bystander CPR.Results: Among 37,283 target subjects of dispatcher instruction, 5743 received CCCPR instruction and 13,926 received conventional CPR instruction. The proportion of CCCPR instruction increased from 5.7% in 2005 to 25.6% in 2012 (p for trend <0.001). The CCCPR instruction group received bystander CPR more frequently than conventional CPR instruction group (70.0% versus 62.1%, p<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, CCCPR dispatcher instruction was significantly associated with provision of bystander CPR compared with conventional CPR instruction (adjusted odds ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.34-1.55).Conclusions: CCCPR dispatcher instruction among adult OHCA patients significantly increased the actual provision of bystander CPR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unlabelled: The aim of this study was to explore challenges in recognition and initial treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by using closed-circuit television (CCTV) recordings combined with audio recordings from emergency medical calls.Method: All OHCA captured by CCTV in the Capital Region of Denmark, 15 June 2013-14 June 2014, were included. Using a qualitative approach based on thematic analysis, we focused on the interval from the victim's collapse to the arrival of the ambulance.Results: Based on the 21 CCTV recordings collected, the main challenges in OHCA seemed to be situation awareness, communication and attitude/approach. Situation awareness among bystanders and the emergency medical dispatchers (dispatcher) differed. CCTV showed that bystanders other than the caller, were often physically closer to the victim and initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Hence, information from the dispatcher had to pass through the caller to the other bystanders. Many bystanders passed by or left, leaving the resuscitation to only a few. In addition, we observed that the callers did not delegate tasks that could have been performed more effectively by other bystanders, for example, receiving the ambulance or retrieving an Automated External Defibrillator (AED).Conclusion: CCTV combined with audio recordings from emergency calls can provide unique insights into the challenges of recognition and initial treatment of OHCA and can improve understanding of the situation. The main barriers to effective intervention were situation awareness, communication and attitude/approach. Potentially, some of these challenges could be minimized if the dispatcher was able to see the victim and the bystanders at the scene. A team approach, with the dispatcher responsible for the role as team leader of a remote resuscitation team of a caller and bystanders, may potentially improve treatment of OHCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]