Search

Background: Aficamten is a cardiac myosin inhibitor that mitigates left ventricular outflow gradients in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). The clinical efficacy of aficamten across multiple outcome domains in oHCM has not been fully defined., Objectives: This responder analysis from the SEQUOIA-HCM (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Placebo in Adults With Symptomatic oHCM) trial characterizes the clinical impact of aficamten., Methods: Patients who were symptomatic of oHCM were randomized to aficamten (n = 142) or placebo (n = 140) daily for 24 weeks. Outcomes assessed included the proportion of patients with complete hemodynamic response (rest and Valsalva gradient <30 mm Hg and <50 mm Hg, respectively), relief in limiting symptoms (≥1 improvement in NYHA functional class and/or ≥10-point change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score), enhanced exercise capacity (≥1.5 mL/kg/min change in peak oxygen uptake), and ≥50% reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. Eligibility for septal reduction therapy was also evaluated., Results: At 24 weeks, patients treated with aficamten vs placebo showed significant improvement in limiting symptoms (71% vs 42%), were more likely to have complete hemodynamic response (68% vs 7%), demonstrated enhanced exercise capacity (47% vs 24%), and showed a decrease ≥50% in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (84% vs 8%) (P ≤ 0.002 for all). An improvement in ≥1 of these outcome measures was achieved in 97% of patients treated with aficamten (vs 59% placebo), including 23% on aficamten who achieved all 4 outcomes compared with none in placebo. Among 32 patients receiving aficamten and 29 patients receiving placebo who were eligible for septal reduction therapy, 28 (88%) from the aficamten group were no longer eligible at 24 weeks compared with 15 (52%) from the placebo group (P = 0.002)., Conclusions: Treatment with aficamten was associated with substantial improvements across a broad range of clinically relevant efficacy measures. These results underscore the wide-ranging potential of aficamten for treatment of patients with symptomatic oHCM (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Placebo in Adults with oHCM [SEQUOIA-HCM]; NCT05186818)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The SEQUOIA-HCM study was funded by Cytokinetics, Incorporated. Dr Maron has received consultant/advisor fees from Imbria, Edgewise, and BioMarin; and has received steering committee fees for SEQUIOA-HCM from Cytokinetics. Dr Masri has received consultant/advisor fees from Tenaya, Attralus, Cytokinetics, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Ionis; and has received research grants from Ionis, Akcea, Pfizer, Ultromics, and the Wheeler Foundation. Dr Nassif has received research and grant support from AstraZeneca and Cytokinetics; and has received consulting/advisory fees from Vifor and Cytokinetics. Dr Barriales-Villa has received consultant/advisor fees from MyoKardia/Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Arad has received consulting and lecture fees from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Cardim has received consultant/advisor fees from Cytokinetics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Menarini, Boehinger Ingelheim, and Bial. Dr Coats has received speaker fees from Alnylam and Roche; and has received advisor fees from Cytokinetics. Dr Düngen has received grants from Novartis, CSL Behring, and Cytokinetics. Dr Garcia-Pavia has received speakers’ bureau fees from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Ionis, Bridgebio, Bristol Myers Squibb, Intelllia, and Alnylam; has received consulting/advisor fees from Pfizer, Alnylam, MyoKardia/Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Neuroimmune, Intellia, Ionis, Bridgebio, Lexeo, Rocket, Attralus, and AstraZeneca; and has received research/educational grants to his institution from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, BridgeBio, and Alnylam. Dr Hagège has received consulting/advisor fees from Alnylam, Amicus Therapeutics, Bayer, MyoKardia/Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Sanofi Genzyme; and has received steering committee fees for SEQUOIA-HCM from Cytokinetics. Dr Januzzi is funded in part by the Hutter Family Professorship; is a Trustee of the American College of Cardiology; has served as a board member for Imbria Pharmaceuticals; has served as a Director at Jana Care; has received grant support from Abbott, Applied Therapeutics, HeartFlow, Innolife, and Roche Diagnostics; has received consulting fees from Abbott, Beckman, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens; and has participated in clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, CVRx, Intercept, and Takeda. Dr Lee has received research grants through his institution from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roche Diagnostics; has been a member of a Clinical Endpoints Committee for Bayer; and has been a member of the Trial Steering Committee for Cytokinetics. Dr Lewis has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01-HL 151841, R01-HL131029, and R01-HL159514), American Heart Association (15GPSGC-24800006), Amgen, Cytokinetics, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, and SoniVie; has received honoraria for advisory boards from Pfizer, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, American Regent, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, and Amgen; and has received royalties from UpToDate for scientific content authorship related to exercise physiology. Dr Michels has received consulting/advisor fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, and Pfizer; and has received research grant funding from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Olivotto has received speakers’ bureau fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Amicus, and Sanofi Genzyme; has received consulting/advisor fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Sanofi Genzyme, Amicus, Bayer, Tenaya, Rocket Pharma, and Lexeo; and has received research grant funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Sanofi Genzyme, Amicus, Bayer, Menarini International, Chiesi, and Boston Scientific. Dr Oreziak has received investigator fees from Cytokinetics and MyoKardia/Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Owens has received consulting/advisor fees from Cytokinetics, Bristol Myers Squibb/MyoKardia. Dr Spertus is the principal investigator of grants from the NIH, Abbott Vascular, and the American College of Cardiology Foundation; has received consulting fees from Janssen, Novartis, Amgen, Myokardia, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Merck; has served on the Scientific Advisory Board of United Healthcare and the Board of Directors for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas City; owns the copyright to the KCCQ, SAQ, and PAQ; and has an equity interest in Health Outcomes Sciences. Dr Solomon has received consulting/advisor fees from Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, DiNAQOR, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, Akros, and Puretech Health; and has received research grants from Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, NIH/NHLBI, Neurotronik, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, and US2.AI. Dr Tfelt-Hansen has received consulting fees from Leo Pharma, MicroPort, and Johnson and Johnson. Ms van Sinttruije is a patient advisory committee member and a SEQUOIA-HCM Steering Committee member for Cytokinetics. Dr Watkins has received consulting/advisor fees from Cytokinetics, BioMarin, and BridgeBio. Drs Jacoby, Heitner, Kupfer, Malik, and Meng and Ms Wohltman are employees of Cytokinetics Incorporated and hold stock in Cytokinetics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Aficamten, a next-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor, improved peak oxygen uptake (pVO 2 ) and lowered resting and Valsalva left ventricular outflow (LVOT) gradients in adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) in SEQUOIA-HCM (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Placebo in Adults With Symptomatic oHCM), a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study., Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the effect of aficamten on echocardiographic measures of cardiac structure and function in SEQUOIA-HCM., Methods: Serial echocardiograms were performed over 28 weeks in patients randomized to receive placebo or aficamten in up to 4 individually titrated escalating doses (5-20 mg daily) over 24 weeks based on Valsalva LVOT gradients and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)., Results: Among 282 patients (mean age 59 ± 13 years; 41% female, 79% White, 19% Asian), mean LVEF was 75% ± 6% with resting and Valsalva LVOT gradients of 55 ± 30 mm Hg and 83 ± 32 mm Hg, respectively. Over 24 weeks, aficamten significantly lowered resting and Valsalva LVOT gradients, and improved left atrial volume index, lateral and septal e' velocities, and lateral and septal E/e' (all P ≤ 0.001). LV end-systolic volume increased and wall thickness decreased (all P ≤ 0.003). Aficamten resulted in a mild reversible decrease in LVEF (-4.8% [95% CI: -6.4% to -3.3%]; P < 0.001) and absolute LV global circumferential strain (-3.7% [95% CI: 1.8%-5.6%]; P < 0.0010), whereas LV global longitudinal strain was unchanged. Several measures, including LVEF, LVOT gradients, and E/e' returned to baseline following washout. Among those treated with aficamten, improved pVO 2 and reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were associated with improvement in lateral e' velocity and septal and lateral E/e' (all P < 0.03), whereas improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Scores (KCCQ-CSS) was associated with a decrease in both LVOT gradients (all P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Compared with placebo, patients receiving aficamten demonstrated significant improvement in LVOT gradients and measures of LV diastolic function, and several of these measures were associated with improvements in pVO 2 , KCCQ-CSS, and NT-proBNP. A modest decrease in LVEF occurred yet remained within normal range. These findings suggest aficamten improved multiple structural and physiological parameters in oHCM without significant adverse changes in LV systolic function. (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Placebo in Adults With Symptomatic oHCM [SEQUOIA-HCM]; NCT05186818)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The SEQUOIA-HCM trial is funded by Cytokinetics, Incorporated. Representatives of Cytokinetics have been involved in the design and conduct of the study reported in this paper. Study design and data analysis was supported by the funder and aided by coauthors. Manuscript drafting was completed independently but reviewed by the funder. Dr Wang is supported by a ACC/Merck Research Fellowship. Dr Hegde’s and Dr Wang’s institutions have received fees for core lab services from Cytokinetics and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Masri has received research grants from Pfizer, Ionis, Attralus, and Cytokinetics; and has received fees from Cytokinetics, BMS, Eidos/BridgeBio, Pfizer, Ionis, Lexicon, Attralus, Alnylam, Haya, Alexion, Akros, Prothena, BioMarin, AstraZeneca, and Tenaya. Dr Nassif has received research and grant support from AstraZeneca and Cytokinetics; and has received consulting/advisory fees from Vifor and Cytokinetics. Dr Barriales-Villa has received consultant/advisor fees from MyoKardia/Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Cardim has received speaker fees from Cytokinetics and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Coats has received speaker fees from Alnylam and Pfizer; and has received advisory fees from Cytokinetics and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Kramer has received research grants from Cytokinetics, BMS, and Eli Lilly; and is a consultant for Eli Lilly. Dr Maron has received consultant/advisor fees from Imbria and Takeda; and has received steering committee fees for SEQUOIA-HCM from Cytokinetics, Incorporated. Dr Michels’ institution has received a research grant from Bristol Myers Squibb; has received consultant/ advisor fees from Cytokinetics and Bristol Myers Squibb/Myokardia and Alnylam; and has received speaker fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer. Dr Olivotto has received research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytotinetics, Sanofi, Benzyme, Amicus, Bayer, Menarini International, Chiesi, and Boston Scientific; has received consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Amicus, Sanofi, and Genzyme; and has served as an Advisory Board member for Cytokinetics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, and Rocket Pharma. Dr Saberi has received consultant/advisor fees from Bristol Myers Squibb; and has received research grants from Cytokinetics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Novartis, and Actelion Pharmaceuticals. Drs Jacoby, Heitner, Kupfer, Meng, and Malik, and Ms Wohltman are employees of and hold stock in Cytokinetics, Incorporated. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Alexion, Alnylam, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Boston Scientific, Cytokinetics, Edgewise, Eidos/Bridgebio, Gossamer, GSK, Ionis, Lilly, NIH/NHLBI, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Tenaya, Theracos, and US2.AI; and has consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alexion, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, Akros, and Valo. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Aficamten, a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor, reversibly reduces cardiac hypercontractility in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We present a prespecified analysis of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of aficamten in SEQUOIA-HCM (Safety, Efficacy, and Quantitative Understanding of Obstruction Impact of Aficamten in HCM)., Methods and Results: A total of 282 patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were randomized 1:1 to daily aficamten (5-20 mg) or placebo between February 1, 2022, and May 15, 2023. Aficamten dosing targeted the lowest effective dose for achieving site-interpreted Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient <30 mm Hg with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%. End points were evaluated during titration (day 1 to week 8), maintenance (weeks 8-24), and washout (weeks 24-28), and included major adverse cardiac events, new-onset atrial fibrillation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharges, LVEF <50%, and treatment-emergent adverse events. At week 8, 3.6%, 12.9%, 35%, and 48.6% of patients achieved 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-mg doses, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Aficamten concentration increased by dose and remained stable during maintenance. During the treatment period, LVEF decreased by -0.9% (95% CI, -1.3 to -0.6) per 100 ng/mL aficamten exposure. Seven (4.9%) patients taking aficamten underwent per-protocol dose reduction for site-interpreted LVEF <50%. There were no treatment interruptions or heart failure worsening for LVEF <50%. No major adverse cardiovascular events were associated with aficamten, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between treatment groups, including atrial fibrillation., Conclusions: A site-based dosing algorithm targeting the lowest effective aficamten dose reduced left ventricular outflow tract gradient with a favorable safety profile throughout SEQUOIA-HCM., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT05186818.

Background: One of the major determinants of exercise intolerance and limiting symptoms among patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an elevated intracardiac pressure resulting from left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Aficamten is an oral selective cardiac myosin inhibitor that reduces left ventricular outflow tract gradients by mitigating cardiac hypercontractility., Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned adults with symptomatic obstructive HCM to receive aficamten (starting dose, 5 mg; maximum dose, 20 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks, with dose adjustment based on echocardiography results. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 24 in the peak oxygen uptake as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The 10 prespecified secondary end points (tested hierarchically) were change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (KCCQ-CSS), improvement in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, change in the pressure gradient after the Valsalva maneuver, occurrence of a gradient of less than 30 mm Hg after the Valsalva maneuver, and duration of eligibility for septal reduction therapy (all assessed at week 24); change in the KCCQ-CSS, improvement in the NYHA functional class, change in the pressure gradient after the Valsalva maneuver, and occurrence of a gradient of less than 30 mm Hg after the Valsalva maneuver (all assessed at week 12); and change in the total workload as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing at week 24., Results: A total of 282 patients underwent randomization: 142 to the aficamten group and 140 to the placebo group. The mean age was 59.1 years, 59.2% were men, the baseline mean resting left ventricular outflow tract gradient was 55.1 mm Hg, and the baseline mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 74.8%. At 24 weeks, the mean change in the peak oxygen uptake was 1.8 ml per kilogram per minute (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 2.3) in the aficamten group and 0.0 ml per kilogram per minute (95% CI, -0.5 to 0.5) in the placebo group (least-squares mean between-group difference, 1.7 ml per kilogram per minute; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.4; P<0.001). The results for all 10 secondary end points were significantly improved with aficamten as compared with placebo. The incidence of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups., Conclusions: Among patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM, treatment with aficamten resulted in a significantly greater improvement in peak oxygen uptake than placebo. (Funded by Cytokinetics; SEQUOIA-HCM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05186818.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) have increased risk of arrhythmia, stroke, heart failure, and sudden death. Contemporary management of oHCM has decreased annual hospitalization and mortality rates, yet patients have worsening health-related quality of life due to impaired exercise capacity and persistent residual symptoms. Here we consider the design of clinical trials evaluating potential oHCM therapies in the context of SEQUOIA-HCM (Safety, Efficacy, and Quantitative Understanding of Obstruction Impact of Aficamten in HCM). This large, phase 3 trial is now fully enrolled (N = 282). Baseline characteristics reflect an ethnically diverse population with characteristics typical of patients encountered clinically with substantial functional and symptom burden. The study will assess the effect of aficamten vs placebo, in addition to standard-of-care medications, on functional capacity and symptoms over 24 weeks. Future clinical trials could model the approach in SEQUOIA-HCM to evaluate the effect of potential therapies on the burden of oHCM. (Safety, Efficacy, and Quantitative Understanding of Obstruction Impact of Aficamten in HCM [SEQUOIA-HCM]; NCT05186818)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The SEQUOIA-HCM trial is funded by Cytokinetics, Incorporated. Representatives of Cytokinetics have been involved in the design and conduct of the study reported in this manuscript. Dr Coats has received speaker fees from Alnylam and Roche, and advisory fees from Cytokinetics. Dr Maron has received consultant/advisor fees from Imbria and Takeda, and Steering Committee fees for SEQUOIA-HCM from Cytokinetics, Incorporated. Dr Olivotto has received Speakers Bureau fees from Boston Scientific, Amicus, and Novartis; consultant/advisor fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Sanofi Genzyme, Amicus, Bayer, Tenaya, and Rocket Pharma; and research grant funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Sanofi Genzyme, Amicus, Bayer, Menarini International, and Boston Scientific. Dr Lee has received research grants to his institution from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, and Clinical Endpoint Committee fees from Bayer. Dr Arad has received consultant and lecture fees from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Cardim is on the advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb and Cytokinetics. Dr Düngen has received grants from Novartis, CSL Behring, and Cytokinetics. Dr Garcia-Pavia has received Speakers Bureau fees from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, NovoNordisk, Bristol Myers Squibb, BridgeBio, Ionis, and Alnylam; consultant/advisor fees from Pfizer, Alnylam, MyoKardia/Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Neurimmune, BridgeBio, Attralus, Intellia, Rocket Pharma, Lexeo Therapeutics, and AstraZeneca; and research/educational grants to his institution from Pfizer, BridgeBio, NovoNordisk, AstraZeneca, and Alnylam. Dr Hagège has received consultant/advisor fees from Alnylam, Amicus Therapeutics, Bayer, MyoKardia/Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Sanofi Genzyme; and Steering Committee fees for SEQUOIA-HCM from Cytokinetics, Incorporated. Dr Lewis has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01-HL 151841, R01-HL131029, and R01-HL159514), American Heart Association (15GPSGC-24800006), Amgen, Cytokinetics, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, and SoniVie; honoraria for advisory boards from Pfizer, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, American Regent, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, and Amgen; and royalties from UpToDate for scientific content authorship related to exercise physiology. Dr Michels’ institution has received a research grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Michels has received consultant/advisor fees from Cytokinetics and Bristol Myers Squibb/Myokardia; and Speakers Bureau fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer. Dr Oreziak has received investigator fees from Bristol Myers Squibb/MyoKardia; consultant/advisor fees from Biotronik Polska, Abbott Polska; and traveling fees from Hammermed. Dr Owens has received consultant/advisor fees from Cytokinetics, Bristol Myers Squibb/MyoKardia, and Pfizer. Dr Tfelt-Hansen is a consultant for Leo Pharma, MicroPort, and Johnson and Johnson. Dr Watkins has received consultant/advisor fees from Cytokinetics, BioMarin, and BridgeBio. Dr Heitner, Dr Jacoby, Dr Kupfer, Dr Malik, Dr Meng, and Ms Wohltman are employees of Cytokinetics, Incorporated and hold stock in Cytokinetics, Incorporated. Dr Masri has received consultant/advisor fees from Tenaya, Attralus, Cytokinetics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eidos, Pfizer, Lexicon, Alnylam, Haya, Intellia, and Ionis; and research grants from Ionis, Akcea, Pfizer, Cytokinetics, Ultromics, and the Wheeler Foundation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although the 12‑lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is abnormal in most patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), some present normal ECG. This study aimed to analyse the baseline characteristics, clinical presentation and outcomes of HCM patients with normal ECG and to compare them with those with abnormal ECG., Methods and Results: Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, data from complementary exams and clinical outcomes of 1070 consecutive patients included in the Portuguese Registry of HCM (Pro-HCM registry) were compared between two groups of patients: normal Vs. abnormal ECG. Among this population, 98 (9.2%) patients had normal ECG at presentation; they were significantly younger and had lower frequency of hypertension, symptoms at presentation, heart failure, angina, cardiac and non-cardiac diseases. ESC and AHA risk scores for Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) were not significantly different between the two groups. Patients with normal ECG had higher prevalence of family history of SCD and lower degree of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, LV systolic dysfunction, LV outflow tract obstruction and myocardial fibrosis. The combined endpoint of cardiac death, SCD, cardiac arrest, appropriate ICD shocks or evolution to systolic dysfunction, during a mean follow-up of 5 years was significantly less frequent in patients with normal ECG (2.1% Vs. 6.5%; p = 0.043)., Conclusions: A normal ECG is not a marker of an overall benign profile in HCM patients. Though a normal ECG at presentation is associated with a less severe phenotype and a lower probability of evolution to heart failure at 5-years, this finding did not show a protective effect in other clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared.

Aims: The European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) Scientific Initiatives Committee performed a global survey to evaluate current practice for the assessment and management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)., Methods and Results: A total of 213 centres from 38 different countries (87% European) responded to the survey. One hundred twenty-one (57%) centres followed HCM patients in a general cardiology outpatient clinic and 85 (40%) centres in a specialized HCM/cardiomyopathy clinic. While echocardiography was the primary imaging modality, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become an important complementary tool. Cardiac anatomy, left ventricular (LV) systolic, and diastolic function were assessed according to current European guidelines and recommendations. To evaluate LV obstruction, 49% of the centres performed bedside provocation manoeuvres in every patient and 55% of the centres used exercise stress echocardiography. The majority of centres used the 5-year risk assessment of sudden cardiac death (SCD) calculated with the HCM Risk-SCD score. However, 34% of the centres also used extensive non-infarct late gadolinium enhancement on CMR and 27% the presence of LV apical aneurysm to help select patients for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Ninety-nine percent of the responding centres performed regular imaging follow-up of HCM patients., Conclusion: Most centres followed European guidelines and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of patients with HCM. The importance of bedside provocation manoeuvres and exercise stress echocardiography to diagnose LV outflow obstruction requires emphasis. Additional risk markers for SCD are used in many centres and might indicate the need for an update of current European recommendations., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction and Objectives: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous disease; there is still a large proportion of patients with no identified disease-causing mutation. Although the majority of mutations are found in the MYH7 and MYBPC3 genes, mutations in Z-disk-associated proteins have also been linked to HCM., Methods: We assessed a small family with HCM based on family history, physical examination, 12-lead ECG, echocardiogram and magnetic resonance imaging. After exclusion of mutations in eleven HCM disease genes, we performed direct sequencing of the TCAP gene encoding the Z-disk protein titin-cap (also known as telethonin)., Results: We present a novel TCAP mutation in a small family affected by HCM. The identified p.C57W mutation showed a very low population frequency, as well as high conservation across species. All of the bioinformatic prediction tools used considered this mutation to be damaging/deleterious. Family members were screened for this new mutation and a co-segregation pattern was detected. Both affected members of this family presented with late-onset HCM, moderate asymmetric left ventricular hypertrophy, atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and low risk of sudden cardiac death., Conclusions: We present evidence supporting the classification of the TCAP p.C57W mutation, encoding the Z-disk protein titin-cap/telethonin as a new likely pathogenic variant of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, with a specific phenotype in the family under analysis., (Copyright © 2020 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Identifying the patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in whom the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) justifies the implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in primary prevention remains challenging. Different risk stratification and criteria are used by the European and American guidelines in this setting. We sought to evaluate the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in improving these risk stratification strategies., Methods: We conducted a multicentric retrospective analysis of HCM patients who underwent CMR for diagnostic confirmation and/or risk stratification. Eligibility for ICD was assessed according to the HCM Risk-SCD score and the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association (ACCF/AHA) algorithm. The amount of LGE was quantified (LGE%) and categorized as 0%, 0.1-10%, 10.1-19.9% and ≥ 20%. The primary endpoint was a composite of SCD, aborted SCD, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), or appropriate ICD discharge., Results: A total of 493 patients were available for analysis (58% male, median age 46 years). LGE was present in 79% of patients, with a median LGE% of 2.9% (IQR 0.4-8.4%). The concordance between risk assessment by the HCM Risk-SCD, ACCF/AHA and LGE was relatively weak. During a median follow-up of 3.4 years (IQR 1.5-6.8 years), 23 patients experienced an event (12 SCDs, 6 appropriate ICD discharges and 5 sustained VTs). The amount of LGE was the only independent predictor of outcome (adjusted HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.04-1.12; p <  0.001) after adjustment for the HCM Risk-SCD and ACCF/AHA criteria. The amount of LGE showed greater discriminative power (C-statistic 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76-0.91) than the ACCF/AHA (C-statistic 0.61; 95% CI: 0.49-0.72; p for comparison < 0.001) and the HCM Risk-SCD (C-statistic 0.68; 95% CI: 0.59-0.78; p for comparison = 0.006). LGE was able to increase the discriminative power of the ACCF/AHA and HCM Risk-SCD criteria, with net reclassification improvements of 0.36 (p = 0.021) and 0.43 (p = 0.011), respectively., Conclusions: The amount of LGE seems to outperform the HCM Risk-SCD score and the ACCF/AHA algorithm in the identification of HCM patients at increased risk of SCD and reclassifies a relevant proportion of patients.

Background: We present an ancillary study of the Portuguese Registry of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (PRo-HCM). This is one of the largest HCM genetic studies based on a registry., Methods and Results: Collected genetic variants were re-analysed for pathogenicity. Demographic, clinical, imaging and outcome data were analysed for associations with genotype, focusing on comparisons between patients with (G+) vs without (G-) a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in one the 9 main causal sarcomeric genes. From the 1042 patients in the registry, 528 (51%) had genetic testing. 152 (28%) were G+ and 98 pts. (19%) had variants of unknown significance. From the patients with the 9 mentioned genes sequenced (424 pts), 14.6% had P/LP variants in MYBPC3, 8.7% MYH7, 4.5% TNNT2, 1.7% TNNI3. Patients were 51 ± 16 years-old, 59% males. Genotype was associated with the following: birthplace (p = 0.005); age (p < 0.001); family history of HCM (p < 0.0005); hypertension (p < 0.0005); chest pain (p = 0.015); pattern of hypertrophy (p = 0.006); left ventricular hypertrophy on the ECG (p < 0.0005); family history of sudden cardiac death (SCD) (p = 0.002). G+ patients more frequently had more than one risk factor for SCD (p = 0.002) and a higher ESC-SCD risk score (p = 0.003). In survival analysis, G+ was associated with SCD (p = 0.017) and MYH7+ with LV systolic dysfunction (p = 0.038)., Conclusion: Half of the registry patients had genetic testing. Sarcomere-positive patients had distinct demographics, ECG, imaging characteristics and family history and are at increased risk of SCD. The presence of a MYH7 mutation was associated with evolution towards LV systolic dysfunction., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Subaortic septal myectomy is usually performed to mitigate obstruction in patients with the obstructive form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) or in those with congenital subaortic stenosis. Moreover, it is combined with aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (SAS) and asymmetrical septal hypertrophy causing concomitant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. When both conditions coexist, it is conceptually difficult to identify a cardiomyopathy beyond an adaptive myocardial hypertrophy, strictly related to pressure overload. Myectomy histopathology might be useful to enlighten the cause of the obstruction and establish the diagnosis., Aim: The aim was to describe the pathological findings of surgical septal myectomy specimens obtained from a group of patients with diverse clinical diagnosis, including HCM, severe aortic stenosis, and asymmetrical septal hypertrophy., Methods: This was a retrospective study of 56 patients undergoing septal myectomy along a 10-year period at a tertiary cardiac surgical center. Clinical, interventional, and anatomopathological findings between patients with and without a preoperative diagnosis of HCM were analyzed and compared., Results: Mean age at intervention was 67.5±20.5 years; 37 (66.1%) were female Preoperative diagnosis of sarcomeric obstructive HCM was assumed in 23 (41.1%) patients. All the other patients (58.9%) were referred for surgery with preoperative diagnosis of asymmetric septal hypertrophy, mainly in the context of severe aortic stenosis (24 patients). Twenty-seven (48.2%) patients had a greater than 30 mmHg intraventricular gradient at rest. Patients with presumed HCM were significantly younger (56.5±15.8 vs. 70.2±13.3 years, P<.001), had higher prevalence of significant intraventricular obstruction at rest [20 (87.0%) vs. 8 (34.8%), P<.001], and more frequently had moderate or severe mitral regurgitation [9 (39.1%) vs. 5(15.1%), P=.043]. All patients with aortic valve stenosis underwent both aortic valve replacement and septal myectomy. Twelve (52.1%) of the patients with obstructive HCM had isolated septal myectomy, while in the remaining 11, the procedure was combined with intervention on the mitral valve. Histopathological final diagnosis was of nonspecific reactive myocardial hypertrophy in all but 4 (92.2%) patients. In those, 2 (3.6%) had the final diagnosis of HCM and 2 (3.6%) the diagnosis of congenital subaortic membranous stenosis with reactive myocardial hypertrophy. Different grades of subendocardial fibroelastosis and myocardial fibrosis, mainly interstitial, were present [27 (48.2%) and 18 (32%) patients, respectively]. When microscopic data were compared between patients with or without a preoperative clinical diagnosis of HCM, no significant differences were found., Conclusion: In patients submitted to surgical septal myectomy, histology was mostly indistinctive among different clinical entities. Since different myocardial hypertrophy etiologies may share similar pathological expression, there is a need for detailed clinical assessment when trying to define the best strategy for clinical management., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We report the results of the Portuguese Registry of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, an initiative that reflects the current spectrum of cardiology centers throughout the territory of Portugal., Methods: A direct invitation to participate was sent to cardiology departments. Baseline and outcome data were collected., Results: A total of 29 centers participated and 1042 patients were recruited. Four centers recruited 49% of the patients, of whom 59% were male, and mean age at diagnosis was 53±16 years. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) was identified as familial in 33%. The major reason for diagnosis was symptoms (53%). HCM was obstructive in 35% of cases and genetic testing was performed in 51%. Invasive septal reduction therapy was offered to 8% (23% of obstructive patients). Most patients (84%) had an estimated five-year risk of sudden death of <6%. Thirteen percent received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years (interquartile range [P25-P75] 1.3-6.5 years), 31% were asymptomatic. All-cause mortality was 1.19%/year and cardiovascular mortality 0.65%/year. The incidence of heart failure-related death was 0.25%/year, of sudden cardiac death 0.22%/year and of stroke-related death 0.04%/year. Heart failure-related death plus heart transplantation occurred in 0.27%/year and sudden cardiac death plus equivalents occurred in 0.53%/year., Conclusions: Contemporary HCM in Portugal is characterized by relatively advanced age at diagnosis, and a high proportion of invasive treatment of obstructive forms. Long-term mortality is low; heart failure is the most common cause of death followed by sudden cardiac death. However, the burden of morbidity remains considerable, emphasizing the need for disease-specific treatments that impact the natural history of the disease., (Copyright © 2017 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Taking into account the complexity and limitations of clinical assessment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), imaging techniques play an essential role in the evaluation of patients with this disease. Thus, in HCM patients, imaging provides solutions for most clinical needs, from diagnosis to prognosis and risk stratification, from anatomical and functional assessment to ischaemia detection, from metabolic evaluation to monitoring of treatment modalities, from staging and clinical profiles to follow-up, and from family screening and preclinical diagnosis to differential diagnosis. Accordingly, a multimodality imaging (MMI) approach (including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac nuclear imaging) is encouraged in the assessment of these patients. The choice of which technique to use should be based on a broad perspective and expert knowledge of what each technique has to offer, including its specific advantages and disadvantages. Experts in different imaging techniques should collaborate and the different methods should be seen as complementary, not as competitors. Each test must be selected in an integrated and rational way in order to provide clear answers to specific clinical questions and problems, trying to avoid redundant and duplicated information, taking into account its availability, benefits, risks, and cost., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The prevalence, complexity, clinical importance, heterogeneity and unpredictability of inherited cardiovascular diseases make the development of inherited cardiovascular disease centers an inevitability, with the ultimate goal of reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with these conditions. An inherited cardiovascular disease center may be seen as a subunit of a cardiology department, with health professionals specializing in these types of disorders, organized to provide excellence in all related areas, including diagnosis, treatment, followup, prevention, risk stratification and prognosis. Among its objectives are the development of action protocols and the creation of databases that enable patients to be included in national and international research networks. To achieve these objectives these centers should include functional units of clinical and basic sciences, research, training and education, acting in harmony in a holistic approach to patients and their families. As most experience on inherited cardiovascular diseases is based on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and on "hypertrophic cardiomyopathy centers", these centers represent an excellent opportunity to learn how to set up inherited cardiovascular disease centers. European centers will differ from country to country, reflecting the heterogeneity of national health systems, but will share a common core, presented in this document. Though we are aware that this ambitious project is not at all easy and may be difficult to implement in its entirety--in fact we consider it a major step--our position is that all the efforts to achieve it are worthwhile, considering that the main goal will always be the well-being of those affected by these particular disorders.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a frequent genetic cardiac disease and the most common cause of sudden cardiac death in young individuals. Most of the currently known HCM disease genes encode sarcomeric proteins. Previous studies have shown an association between CSRP3 missense mutations and either dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or HCM, but all these studies were unable to provide comprehensive genetic evidence for a causative role of CSRP3 mutations. We used linkage analysis and identified a CSRP3 missense mutation in a large German family affected by HCM. We confirmed CSRP3 as an HCM disease gene. Furthermore, CSRP3 missense mutations segregating with HCM were identified in four other families. We used a newly designed monoclonal antibody to show that muscle LIM protein (MLP), the protein encoded by CSRP3, is mainly a cytosolic component of cardiomyocytes and not tightly anchored to sarcomeric structures. Our functional data from both in vitro and in vivo analyses suggest that at least one of MLP's mutated forms seems to be destabilized in the heart of HCM patients harbouring a CSRP3 missense mutation. We also present evidence for mild skeletal muscle disease in affected persons. Our results support the view that HCM is not exclusively a sarcomeric disease and also suggest that impaired mechano-sensory stress signalling might be involved in the pathogenesis of HCM.

Background: Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction is an independent predictor of adverse outcome in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The classical quantification of intraventricular obstruction is performed in resting conditions in supine position, but this assessment does not reflect what happens in HCM patients (pts) in their daily activities, neither during effort nor during orthostatic recovery., Aim: To assess intraventricular gradients with echocardiography during treadmill exercise and in the recovery period in upright position, in HCM pts., Methods: We studied 17 HCM pts (9 males, mean age 53 +/- 16 years, 11 with obstructive HCM). Each pt had 2 echocardiographic evaluations at rest (left lateral decubitus (LLD) and orthostatic position). The pts then underwent a treadmill exercise test and intraventricular gradients were measured at peak exercise and during recovery in orthostatic position., Results: 3 pts with non-obstructive HCM at rest developed intraventricular gradients during exercise. 1 pt developed this gradient only during orthostatic recovery. The mean intraventricular gradient in LLD was 49 +/- 24 mmHg; in orthostatic position was 62 +/- 29 mmHg (p < 0.001 versus in LLD); at peak exercise was 83 +/- 35 mmHg (p < 0.001 versus supine rest); during recovery it was 96 +/- 35 mmHg (p < 0.001 versus peak exercise), Conclusion: In HCM pts the intraventricular gradient increases in orthostatic position, increases significantly during treadmill exercise and continues increasing in the recovery period in orthostatic position. This type of evaluation can help us to better understand the physiopathology, the symptoms and the efficacy of different therapeutic modalities in this disease and should be routinely used in the assessment of HCM pts.

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common genetic heart disease and is often a consequence of mutations in the myosin-binding protein C gene (MYBPC3). Until now, however, no systematic review has been published on mutations of this gene in a Portuguese population., Objectives: In a Portuguese population of HCM patients: 1) to determine the prevalence of mutations in the MYBPC3 gene; 2) to characterize the mutations genetically; 3) to analyze the phenotype and compare it with the genotype-phenotype correlations for mutations in this gene described in the literature., Methods: We studied 45 consecutive index patients with HCM (41 with familial HCM). In each patient, we performed a genetic study to detect mutations in the MYBPC3 gene. Once a mutation was identified and genetically characterized, a broad phenotypic evaluation was performed. The genetic and clinical data were then compared with those described in the literature., Results: Of the 45 patients, 5 (11.1%) showed mutations in the MYBPC3 gene (2 deletions and 3 missense mutations), all in patients with familial HCM. Of these, 4 were 'new' mutations: Ala 522 Thr (exon 17); Gli 1205 Asp (exon 32); Lis 505 Del (exon 17) and Lis 813 Del (exon 25). The other mutation, Arg 502 Gln (exon 17), had been previously described in the literature. Three of the 5 mutations were located in exon 17. Four of these 5 patients were symptomatic, mainly with heart failure and supraventricular arrhythmias. No patient was at high risk for sudden cardiac death. Most of the patients had non-obstructive HCM. The ECG, echocardiogram, Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise test showed highly variable results, reflecting the heterogeneity typical of this disease., Conclusions: In a Portuguese population of 45 HCM patients, 5 (11.1%) had mutations in the MYBPC3 gene (3 missense mutations--theoretically less frequent in the MYBPC3 gene--and 2 deletions). Four of these were 'new' mutations and 3 of them were located in exon 17 (which may be a 'hot spot' for MYBPC3 gene mutations in the Portuguese population). In all the patients, the phenotypic expression was different from that usually described for these mutations; in 3 of our patients, the clinical manifestations and penetrance were of early onset and one patient had a highly symptomatic form of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. These data reflect the large number of exceptions to the classic genotype-phenotype correlations in HCM, highlighting the role of other factors, genetic and non-genetic, in regulating penetrance, clinical expression and prognosis in each family and in each individual patient.

Background: The conventional echocardiographic assessment of myocardial function in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is complex, because of the load dependency of this method. Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) may improve this evaluation., Aim: To compare regional myocardial function with TDI, between patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and with non-obstructive forms of the disease (NOHCM)., Methods: 26 patients with HOCM and 23 with NOHCM were studied with pulsed TDI. We studied longitudinal (8 left ventricular segments, apical views) and radial regional function (2 segments, short axis view), and analyzed velocities, time intervals, velocity-time integrals and heterogeneity and asynchrony indices and the meridional (basal-medial segments) velocity gradient in each wall. Data were compared within each group and between groups., Results: Compared to NOHCM, HOCM patients showed: systolic functions: a) longitudinal: similar velocities, time intervals and integrals; b) radial: higher meridional gradient, lower velocity-time integrals. Diastolic function: a) longitudinal: lower a, higher e and e/a tendency; lower e meridional gradient, higher percentage of septal and anterior wall segments with e/a > or = 1; b) radial: lower a velocities and integrals, shorter diagnostic time., Conclusions: This study shows that in HOCM patients, the presence of obstruction and its associated load conditions have a different impact on systolic and diastolic regional myocardial function, in long and short axis, assessed with TDI. So, in HOCM patients: 1-Long axis regional systolic function is similar to the non-obstructive forms, suggesting relative load independence. 2-Long and short axis regional diastolic function is, in specific segments and parameters, different from the non-obstructive forms. These data should be taken into account in the assessment of regional myocardial function with TDI in HOCM.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) can be caused by mutations in genes encoding for the ventricular myosin essential and regulatory light chains. In contrast to other HCM disease genes, only a few studies describing disease-associated mutations in the myosin light chain genes have been published. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic screening for mutations in the ventricular myosin light chain genes in a group of clinically well-characterised HCM patients. Further, we assessed whether the detected mutations are associated with malignant or benign phenotype in the respective families. We analysed 186 unrelated individuals with HCM for the human ventricular myosin regulatory (MYL2) and essential light chain genes (MYL3) using polymerase chain reaction, single strand conformation polymorphism analysis and automated sequencing. We found eight single nucleotide polymorphisms in exonic and adjacent intronic regions of MYL2 and MYL3. Two MYL2 missense mutations were identified in two Caucasian families while no mutation was found in MYL3. The mutation Glu22Lys was associated with moderate septal hypertrophy, a late onset of clinical manifestation, and benign disease course and prognosis. The mutation Arg58Gln showed also moderate septal hypertrophy, but, in contrast, it was associated with an early onset of clinical manifestation and premature sudden cardiac death. In conclusion, myosin light chain mutations are a very rare cause of HCM responsible for about 1% of cases. Mutations in MYL2 could be associated with both benign and malignant HCM phenotype.

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is classically defined as a diastolic disease with normal systolic function. Long axis left ventricular function is an important and sensitive determinant of global ventricular function but its assessment is often difficult and complex. Tissue Doppler imaging of the mitral annulus allows the study of long axis left ventricular function., Methods: 47 patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 45 healthy volunteers, matched by age and sex, were studied with pulsed tissue Doppler imaging of the 4 sides of the mitral annulus (septal, lateral, inferior, anterior) in 4 and 2 chamber views. In each wave (systolic-s, rapid filling-e, atrial contraction-a) we analyzed velocities, time intervals and velocity-time integrals, as well as heterogeneity and asynchrony. Data were compared among the different sides in each group, between groups and with conventional Doppler data., Results: In contrast to normal subjects, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients showed: 1--Systolic function: lower velocities, longer systolic time intervals (isovolumic relaxation time, time to peak s, ejection time), higher systolic asynchrony (time to peak s, ejection time, systolic time) and lower s/shortening fraction ratio. These changes occurred despite normal indices of global systolic function. 2--Diastolic function: lower velocities (much lower rapid filling velocity, lower atrial contraction velocity, lower septal e/a), higher e/a heterogeneity index, longer protodiastolic times (isovolumic relaxation time and time to peak e), higher diastolic asynchrony (time to peak e) and lower e wave integral. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients also showed higher average number of annular sides with e/a < 1 per patient and higher percentage of e/a < 1, mainly on the septal side., Conclusions: This study shows that: 1--Tissue Doppler imaging allows the detailed analysis of long axis left ventricular function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. 2--Long axis systolic function is abnormal in this disease, even in the presence of normal indices of global systolic function. 3--Long axis diastolic function is deeply disturbed in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, at ventricular and atrial levels. 4--Long axis dysfunction occurs in annular sides contiguous to hypertrophied and non-hypertrophied walls, highlighting the role of other factors in its pathophysiology.

Background: In non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, tissue Doppler imaging of the mitral annulus shows severe systolic and diastolic dysfunction, with marked heterogeneity and asynchrony. In obstructive forms, the complexity of pathophysiological interactions makes conventional echocardiographic functional assessment extremely difficult and complex., Objective: To study longitudinal left ventricular function with tissue Doppler imaging in the obstructive forms of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy., Methods: Twenty-six patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and 23 patients with the non-obstructive form of the disease, matched by age, were studied with pulsed tissue Doppler imaging of the 4 sides of the mitral annulus (septal, lateral, inferior, anterior) in 4 and 2 chamber views. In each wave (systolic-s, rapid filling-e, atrial contraction-a) we analyzed velocities, time intervals and velocity-time integrals, as well as heterogeneity and asynchrony indexes. Data were compared between the different sides in each group, between groups and with conventional Doppler data., Results: In contrast to the non-obstructive forms, patients with intraventricular obstruction showed: Systolic function: similar velocities and integrals, the relations between the different sides of the annulus usually being preserved; longer isovolumic contraction time, time to peak s and PEP/LVET. Diastolic function: similar rapid filling and e/a velocities and integrals, lower atrial contraction velocity and integral, similar number of sides with e/a higher than or equal to 1 on the lateral and inferior side of the annulus; similar diastolic time intervals, except diastolic time., Conclusions: This study shows that the presence of dynamic intraventricular obstruction and the loading conditions of obstructive forms of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy do not significantly influence most annular tissue Doppler imaging parameters, showing the relative load independence of the technique. So, in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients: 1--Longitudinal systolic function (velocities) is similar to the non-obstructive forms--longitudinal systolic dysfunction. 2--Longitudinal diastolic function (velocities and time intervals) is similar to the non-obstructive forms--longitudinal diastolic dysfunction. 3--Left atrial dysfunction is more severe than in non-obstructive forms. 4--The inferior and lateral sides of the annulus should be those selected in order to identify pseudonormalization of the transmitral flow.

Background: Tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDE) is a recent ultrasonic technique. One of its potential clinical uses is the assessment of regional diastolic function., Objectives: To compare left ventricular global diastolic function with interventricular septum regional diastolic function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with different levels of global diastolic dysfunction., Methodology: 10 normal subjects (group 1), eight hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with abnormal relaxation (group 2) and 12 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with restrictive pattern (group 3) on the mitral inflow profile (pulsed wave Doppler) were studied. Each patient performed an M-mode color; TDE of the basal septum in the four chamber view. Velocities during the rapid filling phase (RF), and during atrial contraction (AC) were measured and RF/AC ratio calculated in each patient., Results: While in normal subjects (group 1) the RF/AC ratio was always higher than 1, in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with different levels of global diastolic dysfunction (groups 2 and 3), the RF/AC ratio was always lower than 1 (velocities during atrial contraction always higher than during rapid filling), despite the level of global diastolic dysfunction., Conclusions: A ratio between myocardial velocities during the rapid filling phase and during atrial contraction lower than one (RF/AC < 1) is a tissue Doppler echocardiography index of regional diastolic dysfunction, independently of the severity of global diastolic dysfunction.

Until a few years ago, therapy of refractory Hypertrophic Obstructive cardiomyopathy was mainly surgical--Morrow's myotomy/myectomy or mitral valve replacement. Despite the good results of these techniques, they are not free of mortality and morbidity. In the last years a new and promising therapy has been developed: the Dual Chamber Pacemaker. Technically easier and less invasive than surgery, this therapy has achieved better results and lower mortality and morbidity during the follow-up.

Sudden death is a very important event in the natural history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Although its physiopathology is not still fully understood, there are several potential mechanisms to explain it, such as electrical, ischemic and hemodynamic events. It is thought that these mechanisms vary from patient to patient and that more than one mechanism may coexist in a specific patient. Risk factors for sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are clinical, genetical and electrical. Risk stratification implies aggressive investigation (electrophysiological study and/or forearm plethysmography during exercise and/or tilt test) in order to identify the most probable mechanism involved in each case and to select individualized preventive measures (pharmacological, surgical, implantable cardioverter defibrillator). The role of amiodarone is still controversial because of contradictory results with this drug in this illness.

An evaluation was undertaken regarding two female patients suffering from obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, with high and strongly symptomatic gradients, as well as evidencing a resistance to medication with beta-blockers, verapamil and disopyramide when administered in maximal doses. These patients were provided with the implant of a definitive type DDD pacemaker, with an auricular electrocatheter placed on the right auricular appendix, and with a bipolar ventricular catheter placed on the apex of the right ventricle. The generator was programmed with a short AV so as to ensure that the ventricular stimulation would at any given time be the result of the ventricular contraction would be initiated at the apex portion of the right ventricle. With these therapeutics, we observed not only a reduction or even the gradient, but also the complete elimination of the existing symptoms--angor, dyspnea, dizziness, palpitations and fainting--with the resulting normalcy of the quality of life of the patients. All taken into account we are of the opinion that these therapeutics are, in the case of patients suffering from obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, a valid alternative for surgical treatment by means of myectomy or myotomy, but without the morbidity and mortality rates presented by such methods.