Search

Background and Purpose— Data on effects of intravenous thrombolysis on outcome of patients with ischemic stroke who are dependent on assistance in activities of daily living prestroke are scarce. Recent registry based analyses in activities of daily –independent patients suggest that earlier start of intravenous thrombolysis in the prehospital setting leads to better outcomes when compared with the treatment start in hospital. We evaluated whether these observations can be corroborated in patients with prestroke dependency. Methods— This observational, retrospective analysis included all patients with acute ischemic stroke depending on assistance before stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis either on the Stroke Emergency Mobile (STEMO) or through conventional in-hospital care (CC) in a tertiary stroke center (Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin) during routine care. Prespecified outcomes were modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 3 and survival at 3 months, as well as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Outcomes were adjusted in multivariable logistic regression. Results— Between February 2011 and March 2015, 122 of 427 patients (28%) treated on STEMO and 142 of 505 patients (28%) treated via CC needed assistance before stroke. Median onset-to-treatment times were 97 (interquartile range, 69–159; STEMO) and 135 (interquartile range, 98–184; CC; P P =0.01) and 86 (70%, STEMO) versus 85 (60%, CC) patients were alive ( P =0.07). After adjustment, STEMO care was favorable with respect to modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 3 (odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–3.87; P =0.042) with a nonsignificant result for survival (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.95–3.16; P =0.07). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 5 STEMO versus 12 CC patients (4.2% versus 8.5%; P =0.167). Conclusions— The results of this study suggest that earlier, prehospital (as compared with in-hospital) start of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke may translate into better clinical outcome in patients with prestroke dependency. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02358772.

The effects of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in ischemic stroke are time dependent.1,2 Because of delays in conventional stroke workup, previous randomized IVT trials were unable to include patients with onset-to-treatment time (OTT) ≤60 minutes of symptom onset. With the invention of computed tomography–equipped mobile stroke units (MSUs), a relevant proportion of patients treated on such ambulances receive IVT within this ultraearly time window.3 In this study, we assessed the effects of IVT on 3-month functional outcome and mortality in different OTT intervals, including the first hour after onset, using a pooled analysis of 2 prospective prehospital and in-hospital registries in Berlin/Germany.4 Methods of patient inclusion and documentation in the 2 registries were described elsewhere4 (URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02358772). Briefly, all patients admitted through emergency medical services who received IVT between February 5, 2011, and March 5, 2015, were included in the registries. The prehospital registry included patients thrombolysed in an MSU and admitted to the nearest stroke unit thereafter. Intra-arterial treatment was optional in patients with occlusion of proximal intracranial arteries in both cohorts. The in-hospital registry comprised patients receiving IVT at Charite-Universitatsmedizin, Campus Benjamin Franklin. We excluded patients with nonstroke diagnosis, IVT without known exact (witnessed) time of onset, denial/withdrawal of informed consent for follow-up, missing 3-month follow-up, or incomplete documentation of data used in the multivariable analyses. For the pooled analyses of time-to-treatment effects, we included …

Background: Specialized CT-equipped stroke ambulances can shorten time to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke. Although efficacy of thrombolytic treatment is known to be time-sensitive, effects of pre-hospital thrombolysis on functional outcomes have not yet been evaluated. Methods: We compared outcomes of all consecutive stroke patients who received thrombolysis during the same period cared for either by the Berlin Stroke Emergency Mobile (STEMO) or within conventional care (normal ambulance and in-hospital thrombolysis). Treatment and outcomes were documented in prospective registries. Patients who lived at home without assistance prior to their stroke were included. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤1 at 3 month. Secondary outcome was 3-month mortality. Outcomes were adjusted in multivariable regression for demographics, co-morbidities and stroke severity. Results: From Feb. 5, 2011 to Mar 5, 2015, 427 patients were treated on STEMO and 513 in conventional care. 303 (mean age: 71y, female gender: 48%, median NIHSS: 7) and 357 (mean age: 70y, female gender: 36%, median NIHSS: 7) of them had lived at home without assistance pre-stroke, respectively. Mean onset to treatment time was 34 minutes shorter in STEMO care (96±60 vs. 130±56min). The primary outcome of mRS≤1 was observed in 167 (55%) and 168 (47%) patients (p=0.039); 17 (6%) vs 38 (11%) had died (p=0.02), respectively. Adjusted odds ratios were favorable for STEMO care: OR 1.56 (95%-CI: 1.11-2.20; p=0.01) for mRS≤1 and OR 0.50 (95%-CI: 0.26-0.98; p=0.04) for death. Conclusions: The data suggest that earlier start of IVT by specialized prehospital stroke care leads to improved outcome.

Background and Purpose— Specialized computed tomography–equipped stroke ambulances shorten time to intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke by starting treatment before hospital arrival. Because of longer travel-time-to-scene, time benefits of this concept are expected to diminish with longer distances from base station to scene. Methods— We used data from the Prehospital Acute Neurological Treatment and Optimization of Medical Cares in Stroke (PHANTOM-S) trial comparing time intervals between patients for whom a specialized stroke ambulance (stroke emergency mobile) was deployed and patients with conventional emergency medical service. Expected times from base station to scene had been calculated beforehand using computer algorithms informed by emergency medical service routine data. Four different deployment zones with–75% probability–expected arrival within 4, 8, 12, and 16 minutes and total population coverage of ≈1.3 million inhabitants were categorized for stroke emergency mobile deployment. We analyzed times from alarm-to-arrival at scene, to start of intravenous thrombolysis and from onset-to-intravenous thrombolysis. Results— Corresponding to the size of the respective catchment zone, the number of patients cared increased with distance (zone 1: n=30, zone 2: n=127, zone 3: n=156, and zone 4: n=217). Although time to stroke emergency mobile arrival increased with distance (mean: 8.0, 12.5, 15.4, and 18.4 minutes in zones 1–4), time from alarm-to-intravenous thrombolysis (mean: 41.8 versus 76.5; 50.2 versus 79.1; 54.5 versus 76.6; and 59.3 versus 78.0 minutes, respectively; all P Conclusions— In a metropolitan area such as Berlin, time benefits justify a specialized stroke ambulance service up to a mean travel time of 18 minutes from base station. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01382862.