1. LA reservoir strain: a sensitive parameter for estimating LV filling pressure in patients with preserved EF
- Author
-
Nazli Turan Serifler, Turkan Seda Tan, Irem Dincer, Ayse Irem Demirtola, Demet Menekşe Gerede Uludağ, Irem Muge Akbulut, Haci Ali Kurklu, Nil Özyüncü, Volkan Kozluca, Kerim Esenboğa, Aydan Ongun, and D Eralp Tutar
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Longitudinal strain ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Ventricular Dysfunction, Left ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Internal medicine ,2d speckle tracking ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,In patient ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cardiac imaging ,Heart Failure ,business.industry ,Stroke Volume ,Single parameter ,Mean age ,Left atrial pressure ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction ,business - Abstract
Aims: An elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure is the main finding in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, which is estimated with an algorithm by the recent ASE/EACVI guideline. In this study, we sought to determine the efficacy of the LA global longitudinal strain to estimate the elevated LV filling pressure. Methods and Results: Consecutive patients who underwent left ventricular catheterization between January 2016 and December 2018 were included. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed within 24hrs before the catheterization. The LV filling pressure was estimated using echo parameters based on the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm. Moreover, to evaluate left atrial function, the LA GLS was measured using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography on four chamber-view (GE, Vivid E9 USA). Invasive LV pre-A pressure corresponding to mean left atrial pressure (LAP) was used as a reference, and >12 mm Hg was defined as elevated.71 patients (mean age of 63.2±9.75, 70.4% male) underwent left heart catheterization. Invasive LV filling pressure was defined as elevated in 41 (57.8%) and normal in 30 patients (42.2%). 9(12.7%) patients of 71 were defined as indeterminate based on the 2016 algorithm. Using the ROC method, the accuracy of the algorithm was found as AUC:0.75 with 77% specificity and 70% sensitivity. The accuracy of 25.5 % cut point of LASr was found as AUC:0.79 with 77% specificity and 80% sensitivity for estimating LAP.Conclusions: LASr with higher sensitivity may add an incremental value to estimate LV filling pressure, and hence may be used for HFpEF diagnosis.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF