Search

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem inflammatory condition with occasional cardiac involvement (CS), which may be associated with risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). As data on VTE in CS are sparse and corticosteroid therapy has not been previously examined, we aim to determine the association between CS, corticosteroid treatment for CS, and VTE. Patients referred to our institution with concern for sarcoidosis and underwent a positron emission tomography (PET) scan were retrospectively assessed. Chi-squared and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between a diagnosis of sarcoidosis, CS, corticosteroid use, and VTE events. Six hundred and forty nine patients were split into 3 categories: 235 with no sarcoidosis (NS), 91 with extra-cardiac sarcoidosis only (ECS), and 323 with CS (isolated CS and/or CS with extra cardiac sarcoid). Thirty nine CS, 7 ECS, and 9 NS patients developed PE while 44 CS, 3 ECS, and 18 NS patients developed DVT. On multivariate regression, neither CS nor ECS was an independent risk factor for VTE (p0.05) but corticosteroid use was independently associated with VTE (HR 3.06, p = 0.007 for PE, HR 6.21, p0.0001 for DVT). On logistic regression analysis, corticosteroid dose was found to be independently associated with both PE (p = 0.001) and DVT (p = 0.007). Optimal threshold for defining VTE risk with corticosteroid therapy was a prednisone-equivalent dose of 17.5 mg. In conclusion, contrary to previous studies, this current study found that neither sarcoidosis nor CS is an independent risk factor for VTE. Rather, corticosteroid therapy was associated with an increased risk of VTE.

Background Sarcoidosis is an infiltrative inflammatory condition affecting multiple organs, with cardiac involvement designated as cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). It has been proposed that inflammatory conditions like sarcoid increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), defined as pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) due to the hypercoagulable environment created by inflammation. Purpose Although previous studies have demonstrated an association with sarcoidosis and VTE, these studies failed to account for steroid use (crucial for sarcoid treatment) as an important confounder. Also, no major studies have been done previously assessing the risk of VTE in CS specifically. The objective of this investigation is to determine the association between CS, steroid treatment for CS, and VTE. Methods Patients referred to our institution with concern for sarcoid/CS were retrospectively assessed. Specific variables of interest including general baseline characteristics and those specific to CS were analyzed for their association with VTE development. Results Using Heart Rhythm Society guidelines, 649 patients were split into three categories: 235 with no sarcoid (NS), 91 with extra-cardiac sarcoid (ECS) only, and 323 with CS. In univariate analysis, 39 (12%) CS patients developed a PE vs 9 (4%) NS patients (OR 3.44, p=0.0003) and 44 (14%) CS patients developed DVT vs 18 (8%) NS patients (OR 1.90, p=0.02). In multivariate regression analysis however, neither CS nor ECS was an independent risk factor for VTE (p>0.05) but steroid use was a strong predictor of VTE (HR 3.12, p=0.007 for PE, HR 6.17, p17.5 mg daily on a receiver operating characteristic curve). Conclusion Contrary to previous studies, the current study found that neither sarcoidosis nor CS is an independent risk factor for VTE. Rather, steroid therapy for CS treatment leads to an increased prevalence of VTE, specifically at a dose above 17.5 mg daily. More research is required to clarify this relationship and assess the importance of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy and potentially VTE prophylaxis in CS management. Steroid use and time to PE/DVT Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Background Histologic evidence is required for a definitive diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) by published guidelines; however, the sporadic nature of the disease may produce false negative biopsy results, causing CS to be underdiagnosed. We sought to establish a clinical category of CS absent histologic findings. Methods Patients evaluated for CS were stratified into 3 groups: probable CS and definite CS based on Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) criteria and presumed CS, ie, patients without any histologic evidence of sarcoidosis, but with unexplained high-grade atrioventricular block or ventricular arrhythmia and findings suggestive of CS on either cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography. The primary end point was hospitalization-free and overall survival at 10 years. Results A total of 383 patients were included in the study: 59, definite CS; 223, probable CS; and 101, presumed CS (62, isolated CS and 39, systemic CS). Compared with patients meeting HRS criteria for CS, patients with presumed CS had lower odds of New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 0.44 [95% CI, 0.23–0.83]; P = .01) but greater odds of previous ventricular tachycardia (OR, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.4–4.0]; P = .001) or history of resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest (OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.0–8.6]; P = .05). Hospitalization-free and overall survival were similar among groups (P = .51 and P = .71, respectively). Conclusions Clinical categorization of patients with presumed CS identified a high-risk cohort comparable to patients with histologic evidence of disease, although caution should be exercised in reaching this diagnosis without paying due diligence to the differential diagnosis.

Background Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an infiltrative inflammatory condition defined by infiltration of noncaseating granulomas into the heart. Based on the location of sarcoid lesion involvement, patients can present with symptoms of congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, and even sudden cardiac death. Purpose Diagnosis of CS has been somewhat challenging, with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) being the 2 widely accepted diagnostic guidelines. Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard to prove definite CS but has a low sensitivity. Imaging studies have been helpful as non-invasive methods to diagnose probable CS but these can be logistically difficult and expensive. Thus, investigating for laboratory biomarkers that can act as both diagnostic and prognostic can be crucial in how we diagnose and manage CS in the future. Methods Patients meeting HRS for CS were evaluated at a single institution (n=217). Biomarkers of interest included angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), troponin-T, 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25-OHVit-D), and creatinine. Biomarkers were stratified by clinical variables of interest and their association with prognosis was examined. The primary endpoint was LVAD implantation, transplantation, or death. Results Mean values on presentation were: ACE 32.9±28, ESR 12±13, CRP 7.4±19, NT-proBNP 1630±2923, Troponin-T 0.03±0.1, 1,25-OHVit-D 55.5±20, and creatinine 1.12±0.3. None of the biomarkers differed by sex, definite or probable CS, or a history of immunosuppression. ACE levels were associated with the presence of cardiac fibrosis on cardiac MRI (mean difference 14.7, p=0.032). Troponin-T (p=0.006; HR 1.06 per 0.01 ng/mL), NT-proBNP (p=0.0003; HR 1.31 per 1,000 pg/mL), and creatinine (p=0.01; HR 4.02 per mg/dL) were each associated with the primary endpoint (52/217 patients). Biomarkers associated with long term outcomes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis Biomarker Hazard ratio P value Troponin-T 1.06 (1.02–1.11)* 0.006 NT-pro BNP 1.31 (1.15–1.48)** 0.0003 Creatinine 4.02 (1.41–9.94)*** 0.01 *Per 0.01 ng/mL change; 99th percentile upper reference limit Conclusion Troponin-T, NT-proBNP, and creatinine at presentation predict outcomes in patients with CS. Further investigation on the utility of biomarkers for assessment of disease activity and treatment response is warranted.

Background Patients with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk of cardiovascular events compared to individuals without diabetes. The role glycemic control plays in reducing cardiovascular risk remains uncertain. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is more frequent in women compared to men, is prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes and is linked to adverse cardiovascular events. We compared the association between CMD and glycemic control across sexes in patients with chest pain and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Patients with chest pain who were found to have non-obstructive CAD (stenosis Results Between 1993 and 2012, 1,469 patients (mean age 50.4 years, 35% male) underwent coronary angiography and invasive testing for CMD, of which 129 (8.8%) had type 2 diabetes. Fifty one (39.5%) had an abnormal %ΔCBFAch and 49 (38.0%) had an abnormal CFRAdn. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors did not vary significantly between groups. Females with an abnormal CFRAdn or abnormal %ΔCBFAch had a significantly higher HbA1c compared to those with a normal CFRAdn or %ΔCBFAch respectively: HbA1c % (standard deviation) 7.4 (2.1) vs. 6.5 (1.1), p=0.035 and 7.3 (1.9) vs. 6.4 (1.2), p=0.022, respectively. Females with an abnormal CFRAdn had significantly higher fasting serum glucose concentrations compared to those with a normal CFRAdn: fasting serum glucose mg/dL (standard deviation) 144.4 (55.6) vs. 121.9 (28.1), p=0.035. These effects were not observed in men. Amongst female diabetics, a higher HbA1c was significantly associated with any CMD after adjusting for covariates: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.69 (1.01 – 2.86) p=0.049; and a fasting serum glucose >140 mg/dL was significantly associated with an abnormal CFRAdn, 4.28 (1.43–12.81). Conclusion Poor glycemic control is associated with CMD in females with diabete who present with chest pain and non-obstructive CAD. These findings highlight the importance of sex-specific risk stratification models and treatment strategies when managing cardiovascular risk in diabetics. Acknowledgement/Funding Mayo Foundation

Current Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) guidelines regarding the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) require histologic evidence of sarcoidosis. Due to limitations of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and variable extra-cardiac involvement, CS may be under-diagnosed. Patients evaluated for CS (n=277) were