1. Outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation with and without bioprosthetic valve fracture
- Author
-
Holger Thiele, Darren Mylotte, Julian Witt, Lenard Conradi, Francesco Bedogni, Luca Testa, John Webb, Azeem Latib, Stephan Windecker, Oliver D. Bhadra, Christina Brinkmann, Uri Landes, Maurizio Taramasso, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, Faraj Kargoli, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Didier Tchetche, Joachim Schofer, Thomas Pilgrim, Peter Wohlmuth, Gaetan Charbonnier, Jan Stripling, David Hildick-Smith, Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Subjects
Bioprosthetic valve ,Aortic valve ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Transcatheter aortic ,business.industry ,Internal medicine ,Cardiology ,Medicine ,610 Medicine & health ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Valve in valve - Abstract
BACKGROUND Bioprosthetic valve fracture (BVF) is a technique to reduce gradients in valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (VIV-TAVI) procedures. The outcome of VIV-TAVI with BVF has not been compared with VIV-TAVI without BVF. AIMS The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of VIV-TAVI with BVF compared to VIV-TAVI without BVF. METHODS In total, 81 cases of BVF VIV-TAVI (BVF group) from 14 centres were compared to 79 cases of VIV-TAVI without BVF (control group). RESULTS VARC-2-defined device success was 93% in the BVF group and 68.4% in the control group (p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF