1. Differential clinical impact of chronic total occlusion revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function
- Author
-
Hyungdon Kook, Young Bin Song, Duck Hyun Jang, Hyeon Cheol Gwon, Juneyoung Lee, Jin-Ho Choi, Cheol Woong Yu, Seunghun Lee, Jae Hyoung Park, Jae Young Cho, Youngjin Choi, Hyung Joon Joo, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Je Sang Kim, Joo Yong Hahn, Rak Kyeong Choi, Min Sun Kim, Jeong Hoon Yang, Do Sun Lim, Soon Jun Hong, Hyun Jong Lee, and Jin Sik Park
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Revascularization ,Coronary Angiography ,Total occlusion ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,medicine ,Humans ,Myocardial infarction ,Registries ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Original Paper ,Ejection fraction ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Left ventricular systolic dysfunction ,Hazard ratio ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Chronic total occlusion ,Treatment Outcome ,Coronary Occlusion ,Chronic Disease ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Background The effect of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization on survival remains controversial. Furthermore, data regarding outcome differences for CTO revascularization based on left ventricular systolic function (LVSF) are limited. The differential outcomes from CTO revascularization in patients with preserved LVSF (PLVSF) versus reduced LVSF (RLVSF) were assessed. Methods A total of 2,173 CTO patients were divided into either a PLVSF (n = 1661, Ejection fraction ≥ 50%) or RLVSF (n = 512, Results Patients with RLVSF had a mean 37% ejection fraction (EF) and 19% had EF p p = 0.0019], which was mainly driven by a reduction in cardiac death. The difference in survival probability was greater and became more pronounced over time in patients with RLVSF than with PLVSF (1-year, p = 0.197; 3-years, p = 0.048; 5-years, p = 0.036). Conclusions SCR was associated with better survival benefit than OMT regardless of LVSF. The benefit was greater and became more significant over time in patients with RLVSF versus PLVSF. Graphic abstract
- Published
- 2020