Search

Objectives:\ud \ud This study aimed to assess the impact of stent optimization by NC‐balloon postdilatation (PD) during primary‐PCI for STEMI with the use of coronary physiology and intracoronary imaging.\ud \ud Methods:\ud \ud This was a prospective observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02788396). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and physiological measurements were performed immediately before and after PD with the operators blinded to all measurements. The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were measured. OCT analysis was performed for assessment of stent expansion, malapposition, in‐stent plaque‐thrombus prolapse (PTP) and stent‐edge dissections (SED). The change in IMR before and after PD as a measure of microvascular injury was the primary objective of the study.\ud \ud Results:\ud \ud Thirty‐two STEMI patients undergoing primary‐PCI had physiological measurements before and after PD. All patients received second‐generation DES (diameter 3.1 ± 0.5 mm, length 29.9 ± 10.7 mm) and postdilatation with NC‐balloons (diameter 3.6 ± 0.6 mm, inflation pressure 19.3 ± 2.0 atm). IMR (44.9 ± 25.6 vs. 48.8 ± 34.2, p = 0.26) and CFR (1.60 ± 0.89 vs. 1.58 ± 0.71, p = 0.87) did not change, while FFR increased after PD (0.91 ± 0.08 vs. 0.93 ± 0.06, p = 0.037). At an individual patient level, IMR increased in half of the cases. PD improved significantly absolute and relative stent expansion, reduced malapposition, and increased PTP. There was no difference in clinically relevant SED.\ud \ud Conclusion:\ud \ud In this exploratory, hypothesis‐generating study, postdilatation during primary‐PCI for STEMI improved stent expansion, apposition and post‐PCI FFR, without a significant effect on coronary microcirculation overall. Nevertheless, IMR increased in a group of patients and larger studies are warranted to explore predictors of microcirculatory response to postdilatation.

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) uses pressure-based measurements to assess the severity of a coronary stenosis. Distal pressure (Pd) is often at a different vertical height to that of the proximal aortic pressure (Pa). The difference in pressure between Pd and Pa due to hydrostatic pressure, may impact FFR calculation. Methods: One hundred computed tomography coronary angiographies were used to measure height differences between the coronary ostia and points in the coronary tree. Mean heights were used to calculate the hydrostatic pressure effect in each artery, using a correction factor of 0.8 mmHg/cm. This was tested in a simulation of intermediate coronary stenosis to give the “corrected FFR” (cFFR) and percentage of values, which crossed a threshold of 0.8. Results: The mean height from coronary ostium to distal left anterior descending (LAD) was +5.26 cm, distal circumflex (Cx) –3.35 cm, distal right coronary artery-posterior left ventricular artery (RCA-PLV) –5.74 cm and distal RCA-posterior descending artery (PDA) +1.83 cm. For LAD, correction resulted in a mean change in FFR of +0.042, –0.027 in the Cx, –0.046 in the PLV and +0.015 in the PDA. Using 200 random FFR values between 0.75 and 0.85, the resulting cFFR crossed the clinical treatment threshold of 0.8 in 43% of LAD, 27% of Cx, 47% of PLV and 15% of PDA cases. Conclusions: There are significant vertical height differences between the distal artery (Pd) and its point of normalization (Pa). This is likely to have a modest effect on FFR, and correcting for this results in a proportion of values crossing treatment thresholds. Operators should be mindful of this phenomenon when interpreting FFR values.

AIMS Recent studies have suggested that a low proportion of patients presenting with left bundle branch block (LBBB) require emergency intervention. In this study, we have compared baseline clinical characteristics, angiographic findings and subsequent outcomes in patients with LBBB versus ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) referred to our tertiary centre for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS A large retrospective observational study was performed involving 1875 consecutive patients presenting to our single tertiary cardiac centre for primary PCI over a 27-month period. Patients presenting with LBBB (n=155, 8.3%) were significantly older (P

Aim Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) is increasingly being recognised in patients admitted with suspected acute coronary syndrome, as access to angiography and echocardiography is much quicker than before. We aimed to analyse the prevalence of typical TCM in patients admitted for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) with suspected ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to a single tertiary centre in United Kingdom. Methods All patients admitted to our unit with suspected STEMI from September 2009 to November 2011 were included for analysis. Results Of the 1875 patients admitted, 17 patients (all female) with mean age of 69 ± 11.9 yrs were identified to have clinical features of typical TCM, thus giving an overall prevalence of 0.9% in PPCI admissions (3.2% prevalence in women). The admission ECG showed ST elevation in 14 patients (82%) and 3 had LBBB (18%). In the 16 patients who had raised hs Troponin (normal range Conclusion This is the first observational study to report the prevalence of typical TCM in patients admitted for PPCI in “real-world” practice. Though this condition is not benign during the acute episode, there is a good survival outcome if managed appropriately during the acute phase.

The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) emerges as a valuable prognostic tool in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronay intervention (PPCI). An IMR value more than 40 at the end of the procedure has been related with worse outcomes. In the

AIM Very few randomized trials have analysed the outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in very elderly patients (≥80 years). An observational study was performed to evaluate the outcome of PPCI in patients of at least 80 years of age who were admitted to our unit. METHODS We included all patients undergoing PPCI in our unit from September 2009 to November 2011. RESULTS Of the 1471 patients who underwent PPCI during the study period, 236 (16%) were at least 80 years of age. The mean age was 85 ± 4 years (range 80-99 years, median 85 years). There was a significant difference in in-hospital mortality [14.4 vs. 2.9%, odds ratio (OR) 5.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.4-9.2, P

Objective We aimed to carry out a “real world” comparison of bivalirudin plus unfractionated heparin (UFH) versus abciximab plus UFH in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods We included patients who had abciximab or bivalirudin during their PPCI in our unit between Sept 2009 and Nov 2011. Results The study included 516 and 484 patients in the bivalirudin and abciximab group respectively. There were more women in the bivalirudin group (29% vs 20%, p 0.001), while cardiogenic shock (6.4% vs 10.1%, p 0.04) and thrombectomy device use (76.6% vs 82%, p 0.04) were lower in the bivalirudin group. The primary composite end point of 30-day mortality, 30-day definite stent thrombosis or non-CABG major bleeding was similar between the bivalirudin and abciximab groups (7.8% vs 9.5%, OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.2, p 0.4). There was also no difference in in-hospital mortality (4.1% vs 4.3%, p 0.9), 30-day mortality (5.2% vs 6.4%, p 0.5), 1-year mortality (9.1% vs 9.9%, p 0.7), 30-day stent thrombosis (1% vs 0.4%, p 0.5) and non-CABG bleeding (2.7 vs 3.7%, p 0.4) between the bivalirudin and abciximab group respectively. On Cox proportional hazard analysis after adjusting for all the co-variates, the use of bivalirudin was not a predictor of 30-day mortality (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.7–1.9, p 0.7). Conclusion In this “real-world” observational study, there was no significant difference in the clinical outcome of PPCI for patients who had abciximab or bivalirudin after initial pre-treatment with UFH.

In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, optimal stent deployment is challenging due to factors like thrombus formation and vasoconstriction. In this setting stent post-dilatation with non-compliant (NC) balloons could optimise acute results, but carries a risk of distal embolization and

Rotational atherectomy (rotablation) of coronary artery is relatively contraindicated in high thrombotic state such as acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) because of the risk of platelet activation by the rotablator. We present a case where rotablation was necessary to recanalize the right coronary artery in a patient presenting with acute STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock, after unsuccessful attempts with balloon catheters. He improved remarkably after the procedure and was discharged after 4 days.

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a recognised complication during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) that affects short and long term prognosis. Volume of contrast media used is a known predisposing factor for its development. The aim of this study was to determine the

Introduction Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has been established as standard therapy for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Very few trials have looked at the outcome of PPCI in elderly patients. Even in trials which claimed to have looked at PPCI in elderly patients such as SENIOR PAMI (Grines, 2005) and TRIANA (Bueno, 2009) the minimum age for inclusion was 70 yrs and 75 yrs respectively. With an ageing population in the western world, about 20% of patients admitted for suspected STEMI are ≥80 yrs. We evaluated the outcome of PPCI in patients ≥80 yrs who were admitted to our unit with STEMI. Methods Our PPCI service was started in September 2009 and we analysed all the patients who were ≥80 yrs presenting to the PPCI service between September 2009 and September 2010 (13 months). Prospectively entered data were obtained from our dedicated cardiac service database system (Philips CVIS). Mortality data were obtained from the summary care record (SCR) database. Follow-up data were obtained from patients9 respective district general hospitals and general practitioners medical records. Results Of the 998 patients who were admitted to our unit for primary PCI for suspected STEMI during the study period, 183 (18.3%) were ≥80 yrs of age. After excluding 51 patients (27.9%) who did not undergo PPCI, we included 132 (70.1%) patients for analysis. Of those who were included in the study (n=132, 63 female), the mean age was 85±3.95 yrs (range 80–99 yrs, median 85 yrs). There were 20 diabetics (15.2%) and 39 (29.5%) had previous myocardial infarction. Ten patients (7.6%) were in cardiogenic shock on arrival of which 9 (90%) had an Intra aortic balloon pump (IABP). The infarct related vessel was the right coronary in 42.4% and left anterior descending in 37.1%. Drug eluting stents were used in 40.2% of patients. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 14.4% and 19.7% respectively. There was a significant difference in the mortality between patients age Conclusion This study clearly demonstrates a significant mortality difference between patients aged

Aims Current national and international guidelines continue to recommend activation of the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) pathway in patients presenting with chest pain and presumed new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB). Previous research has suggested that a lower proportion of patients presenting with LBBB require emergency intervention. In this study we have compared baseline clinical characteristics, angiographic findings and subsequent outcome in patients with LBBB versus ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) referred to our tertiary centre for PPCI. Methods All patients accepted for PPCI within the period of September 2009 to November 2011 were included in the study. Patient data obtained from our Cardiac Services Database System (Phillips CVIS) were analysed and angiographic images reviewed on our Cardiac Image Database (McKesson Horizon). Mortality data were gathered from the Summary Care Record (SCR) database. Statistical comparisons of continuous variables were made by an unpaired t test. Categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 test. A p value of Results During the study period, 1875 patients were referred for PPCI of whom 155 (8.3%) had LBBB. Compared with STEMI, patients with LBBB were significantly older, more likely to be female and have prior history of MI and CABG (table 1). Patients with LBBB had similar door-to-balloon (DTB) and call-to-balloon (CTB) times. PCI was performed in 40 (26%) patients with LBBB although an acutely occluded culprit vessel was found in only 19 (12.2%) patients (table 2). Furthermore, 85 (54.8%) patients had non-flow limiting coronary artery disease and of those with significant disease 12 (7.7%) patients required CABG (figure 1). Overall, an acute coronary syndrome (defined as ischaemic chest pain with positive troponin) was confirmed in only 67 (43.2%) of patients presenting with LBBB. 30-day mortality was similar between LBBB and STEMI patients (table 2). However, during a mean follow-up period of 2.1 years, overall mortality was significantly higher in the LBBB group compared to STEMI (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.20) (figure 2). Conclusions Our study shows that, in contrast to STEMI, only a small proportion of patients presenting with chest pain and LBBB had an acutely occluded coronary artery. Although short-term mortality was similar between the two groups, long-term outcome was significantly worse in patients with LBBB. Further work is needed to identify those patients presenting with LBBB who are most likely to have an acute coronary occlusion, in order to facilitate the appropriate use of emergency coronary angiography and PPCI.

Introduction Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) is increasingly being recognised in patients admitted with suspected acute coronary syndrome, as access to angiography and echocardiography are much quicker than before. Typically, patients with TCM present to the primary PCI service (PPCI) with chest pain and ST elevation on their electrocardiogram mimicking ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there is no ‘real-world’ data about the prevalence of this condition in PPCI admissions for suspected STEMI. Therefore we aimed to analyse the prevalence of TCM in a high volume regional PPCI service in UK. Methods All patients admitted with suspected STEMI between Sept 2009 and Nov 2011 to our centre were included. After excluding those who underwent PPCI, We analysed the echocardiogram and/or left ventriculogram of those patients who did not undergo PPCI to identify patients with typical TCM features of apical akinesia with basal hyperkinesia. Their coronary angiograms were reviewed and the inclusion criteria to identify TCM was the absence of significant coronary disease with no artery having >50% stenosis. Results Of the 1875 patients admitted, 17 (0.9%) patients (0 m, 17 f) with the mean age of 70±10.7 years (range 56–94 years) were identified to have typical TCM features. The prevalence of TCM in female PPCI admission was 3.1% (17/560) (figure 1). The admission ECG showed ST elevation in 14 patients (82%) and three had LBBB (18%). In those who had positive hsTroponin (n=16, 94.1%), the mean level was 921±668 (median 778, range 110–2550). Two patients had cardiac arrest prior to hospital admission with successful resuscitation. Left ventricular function was severely impaired (EF≤30%) in 2 patients whilst all others had moderately impaired LV function (EF 31–50%) (table 1). Aspirin, β-blocker, Angiotensin converter enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) was given to 13 (76.5%), 13 (76.5%) and 15 (88.2%) patients respectively on their discharge. All the 15 patients who had repeat echocardiogram within 3 months of their index admission showed complete recovery of their LV function. During a mean follow up period of 22±7 months (median 21, range 8–36 months), there was no mortality. Conclusions This first ‘real-world’ observational study of TCM in STEMI patients admitted for PPCI to a single centre showed an overall prevalence of 0.9% with 3% prevalence in female population. Although TCM is not benign during the acute episode, there is an excellent survival outcome if managed appropriately during the acute phase.

Introduction Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) has been established as a standard therapy for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In addition to thrombectomy and unfractionated heparin (UFH), thrombus burden in STEMI may require use of more potent antithrombotic agents. Bivalirudin is shown to be superior to abciximab in reducing the net adverse clinical events and major bleeding in STEMI in the HORIZONS-AMI trial (Stone et al NEJM , 2008). We aimed to carry out a “real world” comparison of different anti-thrombotic regimes in patients undergoing PPCI in our unit. Methods Our PPCI service started in September 2009 and we included all patients undergoing PPCI between September 2009 and September 2010. Prospectively entered data were obtained from our dedicated cardiac service database system (Philips CVIS). Mortality data were obtained from the summary care record (SCR) database. We used Fisher′s exact test to compare clinical outcomes between the groups. Results Of the 998 patients admitted with suspected STEMI to our unit during the study period, 776 (77.8%) underwent PPCI. After excluding patients who had both bivalirudin and abciximab during their procedure (n=15), we divided the others (n=761) into 3 groups according to the anti-thrombotic regime used (Grp 1- Abciximab+UFH, Grp 2- Bivairudin+UFH and Grp 3- “UFH only”). Patient demographics and procedural information are given in Abstract 30 table 1. Continuous data are presented as mean± SD. Clinical outcomes are shown in Abstract 30 table 2. In-hospital and 30-day mortality did not differ between patients who had bivalirudin vs abciximab (5.6% vs 3.8%, p=0.35 and 6.8% vs 5.2% p=0.53 respectively). Both acute and 30 day stent thrombosis rates were also similar in the two groups (0.6% vs none, p=0.3, 0.6% vs 0.9%, p=1.0 respectively). Even though the bleeding risk was higher in the abciximab group when compared with bivalirudin, this was not significant (5.8% vs 3.1%, p=0.27). There was also no difference in the outcomes between the bivalirudin and “UFH only” groups for mortality, stent thromboses (acute and 30-day) and major bleeding. The abciximab group had significantly higher major bleeding rates than the “UFH only” group (5.8% vs 2.4%, p=0.04); all other outcomes were similar. Conclusion These “real-world” data do not show any significant difference in the clinical outcome for patients who had bivalirudin or abciximab. There was no advantage seen with the more expensive agent (abciximab) in keeping with previous trial data. Therefore bivalirudin should be considered as a non-inferior alternative to abciximab. This would have considerable economic benefits in the present situation. The “UFH only” group had similar outcomes to both bivalirudin and abciximab, which suggests that this may be a viable alternative in its own right. However, our study is clearly limited by not being randomised and those patients treated with UFH alone may have been a lower risk group.