1. Safety and efficacy of coronary sinus narrowing in chronic refractory angina: Insights from the RESOURCE study
- Author
-
Arif A Khokhar, Carlo Zivelonghi, Mirthe Dekker, Geert E. Leenders, Roberto Ferrari, F Sgura, Stefan Verheye, Giuseppe Tarantini, Alessandro Cafaro, Jan-Peter van Kuijk, Stefano Guarracini, Christoph Liebetrau, Maayan Konigstein, Sergio Berti, Dan Ioanes, Matjaž Bunc, Pieter R. Stella, Leo Timmers, Issameddine Ajmi, Antonio Colombo, Shmuel Banai, Ranil de Silva, Francesco Ponticelli, Pierfrancesco Agostoni, Claudio Rapezzi, Max J. M. Silvis, Alfonso Ielasi, Matteo Tebaldi, M. Ciardetti, Jan Sebastian Wolter, Michele Di Mauro, Kevin Cheng, Gianluca Campo, Simon Redwood, Guglielmo Gallone, Francesco Giannini, Tiffany Patterson, Federico De Marco, Gianpiero D'Amico, Steffen Schnupp, and Steven Lindsay
- Subjects
Canada ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Chronic coronary syndrome ,RESOURCE study ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Refractory angina ,NO ,Percutaneous coronary intervention ,Coronary artery disease ,Angina ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,Israel ,Coronary sinus reducer ,Stroke ,Coronary sinus ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Coronary Sinus ,Canadian Cardiovascular Society ,medicine.disease ,United Kingdom ,Europe ,Treatment Outcome ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Mace - Abstract
Introduction Refractory angina (RA) is considered the end-stage of coronary artery disease, and often has no interventional treatment options. Coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) is a recent addition to the therapeutic arsenal, but its efficacy has only been evaluated on small populations. The RESOURCE registry provides further insights into this therapy. Methods The RESOURCE is an observational, retrospective registry that includes 658 patients with RA from 20 centers in Europe, United Kingdom and Israel. Prespecified endpoints were the amelioration of anginal symptoms evaluated with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) score, the rates of procedural success and complications, and MACEs as composite of all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndromes, and stroke. Results At a median follow-up of 502 days (IQR 225–1091) after CSR implantation, 39.7% of patients improved by ≥2 CCS classes (primary endpoint), and 76% by ≥1 class. Procedural success was achieved in 96.7% of attempts, with 3% of procedures aborted mostly for unsuitable coronary sinus anatomy. Any complication occurred in 5.7% of procedures, but never required bailout surgery nor resulted in intra- or periprocedural death or myocardial infarction. One patient developed periprocedural stroke after inadvertent carotid artery puncture. At the last available follow-up, overall mortality and MACE were 10.4% and 14.6% respectively. At one, three and five years, mortality rate at Kaplan-Meier analysis was 4%, 13.7%, and 23.4% respectively. Conclusions CSR implantation is safe and reduces angina in patients with refractory angina.
- Published
- 2021