Search

Background Clinical implications of change in the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guideline on the diagnosis and management of hypertension, compared with recommendations by 2014 expert panel and Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC7), are not known. Methods and Results Using data from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry) PINNACLE (Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence) Registry (January 2013‐Decemver 2016), we compared the proportion and clinical characteristics of patients seen in cardiology practices diagnosed with hypertension, recommended antihypertensive treatment, and achieving blood pressure (BP) goals per each guideline document. In addition, we evaluated the proportion of patients at the level of practices meeting BP targets defined by each guideline. Of 6 042 630 patients evaluated, 5 027 961 (83.2%) were diagnosed with hypertension per the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline, compared with 4 521 272 (74.8%) per the 2014 panel and 4 545 976 (75.2%) per JNC7. The largest increase in hypertension prevalence was seen in younger ages, women, and those with lower cardiovascular risk. Antihypertensive medication was recommended to 70.6% of patients per the ACC/AHA guideline compared with 61.8% and 65.9% per the 2014 panel and JNC7, respectively. Among those on antihypertensive agents, 41.2% achieved BP targets per the ACC/AHA guideline, compared with 79.4% per the 2014 panel and 64.3% per JNC7. Lower proportions of women, non‐White (Black and "other") races, and those at higher cardiovascular risk achieved BP goals. Median practice‐level proportion of patients meeting BP targets per the 2014 panel but not the ACC/AHA guideline was 37.8% (interquartile range, 34.8%–40.7%) and per JNC7 but not the ACC/AHA guideline was 22.9% (interquartile range, 19.8%–25.9%). Conclusions Following publication of the 2017 guideline, significantly more people, particularly younger people and those with lower cardiovascular risk, will be diagnosed with hypertension and need antihypertensive treatment compared with previous recommendations. Significant practice‐level variation in BP control also exists. Efforts are needed to improve guideline‐concordant hypertension management in an effort to improve outcomes.

Background Although intensive blood pressure reduction has cardiovascular benefits, the absolute benefit is greater in those at higher cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Objectives This study examined whether N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) helps identify subjects at higher risk for CVD events across systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), or pulse pressure (PP) categories. Methods Participants from the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study visit 4 (1996 to 98) were grouped according to SBP, DBP, or PP categories and further stratified by NT-proBNP categories. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios for incident CVD (coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, or heart failure hospitalization) and mortality across combined NT-proBNP and/or BP categories, adjusting for CVD risk factors. Results There were 9,309 participants (age: 62.6 ± 5.6 years; 58.3% women) with 2,416 CVD events over a median follow-up of 16.7 years. Within each SBP, DBP, or PP category, a higher category of NT-proBNP (100 to Conclusions Elevated NT-proBNP is independently associated with CVD and mortality across SBP, DBP, and PP categories and helps identify subjects at the highest risk. Participants with stage 1 hypertension but elevated NT-proBNP had greater cardiovascular risk compared with those with stage 2 SBP but lower NT-proBNP. Future studies are needed to evaluate use of biomarker-based strategies for CVD risk assessment to assist with initiation or intensification of BP treatment.

Purpose of Review This review highlights late-breaking science presented at the Virtual American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2021 that demonstrated advancements in preventative cardiology and introduced novel therapeutic modalities for the management of chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and COVID-19. Recent Findings The studies reviewed include clinical trials that assessed the use of dapagliflozin in patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (DARE-19 trial); evinacumab for patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia and pancreatitis; effect of genotype-guided oral P2y12 inhibitors vs conventional clopidogrel on long-term ischemic outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (TAILOR-PCI trial); anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (ACTION trial); atorvastatin vs placebo in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU (INSPIRATION-S trial); rehabilitation therapy in older acute heart failure patients (REHAB-HF trial); and aspirin dosing: a patient-centric trial assessing benefits and long-term effectiveness (ADAPTABLE trial). In addition, we review the results of the American College of Cardiology Global Heart Attack Initiative (GHATI). Finally, we discuss the secondary analysis of the STRENGTH trial assessing the association of achieved levels of omega-3 fatty acid levels and major cardiovascular outcomes. Summary The studies presented at the virtual American College of Cardiology Scientific Session 2021 represent remarkable contributions in the field of cardiovascular disease and prevention.

Background Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as alternatives to vitamin K antagonists in select situations. For left atrial (LA) appendage thrombus in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter, guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation (OAC) for at least 3 weeks prior to reassessment. Data comparing NOACs to warfarin in this scenario are scarce. Methods A retrospective study identified subjects with nonvalvular AF or flutter who were: a) noted to have LA thrombus detected on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), b) previously not receiving long-term OAC; and c) evaluated for resolution of LA thrombus by follow-up TEE between 3 weeks to less than 1 year of the initial TEE. Results The study included 45 subjects with mean age 63.2 years, 69% male, 78% white race/ethnicity, 42% paroxysmal, and mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc score 3.4 ± 1.7. All LA thrombi were confined to the appendage. OAC received included apixaban (3), dabigatran (13), rivaroxaban (6), and warfarin (23), The median follow-up time to repeat TEE was 67 (interquartile range, 49-96) days. LA appendage thrombus resolution rates were 76% for the entire cohort, 77% for NOACs, and 74% for warfarin. In univariable logistic regression analysis, LA appendage thrombus resolution was similar for NOACs when compared to warfarin (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-4.69; P = .79). Conclusions In patients nonvalvular AF or flutter who were OAC naive at the time of diagnosis with LA appendage thrombus, complete resolution was similar between NOACs and warfarin.

Purpose Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in adults in the United States, yet the benefits of genetic testing are not universally accepted. Methods We developed the "HeartCare" panel of genes associated with CVD, evaluating high-penetrance Mendelian conditions, coronary artery disease (CAD) polygenic risk, LPA gene polymorphisms, and specific pharmacogenetic (PGx) variants. We enrolled 709 individuals from cardiology clinics at Baylor College of Medicine, and samples were analyzed in a CAP/CLIA-certified laboratory. Results were returned to the ordering physician and uploaded to the electronic medical record. Results Notably, 32% of patients had a genetic finding with clinical management implications, even after excluding PGx results, including 9% who were molecularly diagnosed with a Mendelian condition. Among surveyed physicians, 84% reported medical management changes based on these results, including specialist referrals, cardiac tests, and medication changes. LPA polymorphisms and high polygenic risk of CAD were found in 20% and 9% of patients, respectively, leading to diet, lifestyle, and other changes. Warfarin and simvastatin pharmacogenetic variants were present in roughly half of the cohort. Conclusion Our results support the use of genetic information in routine cardiovascular health management and provide a roadmap for accompanying research.

Aims Despite statin and antihypertensive therapies, older Americans have high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Novel measures of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein triglycerides (LDL-TG), and remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C), are associated with ASCVD in middle-aged adults. Polymorphisms in genes encoding angiopoietin-related protein 3 (ANGPTL3) and apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III), two proteins involved in triglyceride catabolism, are associated with increased risk for hypertriglyceridaemia and ASCVD and are potential therapeutic targets. We examined associations of LDL-TG, RLP-C, apoC-III, and ANGPTL3 levels with ASCVD events in older adults in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Methods and results In 6359 participants (mean age 75.8 ± 5.3 years) followed for ASCVD events [coronary heart disease (CHD) or ischaemic stroke] up to 6 years, associations between LDL-TG, RLP-C, apoC-III, and ANGPTL3 and ASCVD events were assessed using Cox regression. With adjustment for age, sex, and race, RLP-C, LDL-TG, apoC-III, and ANGPTL3 (as continuous variables) were significantly associated with CHD. However, after adjustment for traditional risk factors and lipid-lowering medications, only LDL-TG and ANGPTL3 were significantly associated with ASCVD events [hazard ratio (HR) 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25–2.37 per log unit increase in LDL-TG; HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.17–2.28 per log unit increase in ANGPTL3]. Conclusions In older adults, LDL-TG, RLP-C, apoC-III, and ANGPTL3 were associated with CHD events in minimally adjusted models; LDL-TG and ANGPTL3 remained independent predictors of ASCVD events with further adjustment. Future studies should assess potential benefit of lowering hepatic apoC-III or ANGPTL3 expression in patients with elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins.

Detection of subclinical atherosclerosis through noninvasive imaging such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve cardiovascular risk stratification beyond that based on traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Ultrasound-based measures such as carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and presence of plaque (carotid, iliofemoral) have been evaluated and shown to have associations with cardiovascular events. However, given issues with reproducibility and other potential errors related to assessment of CIMT, there is currently a greater focus on use of carotid artery plaque measurement for cardiovascular risk assessment. The Mannheim consensus defined plaque as a focal structure or thickening (1) that is at least 50% greater than the thickness of its surrounding vessel, or (2) encroaches into the arterial lumen by at least 0.5 mm, or (3) demonstrates a CIMT greater than 1.5 mm. Several methods of plaque quantification including plaque score, plaque area, and 3D ultrasound-based plaque volume have been shown to predict cardiovascular outcomes. Additional efforts in characterizing plaque also continue to be evaluated. Carotid MRI is an important diagnostic tool not only to identify plaque burden but also to characterize plaque components including a thin fibrous cap, lipid-rich necrotic core, calcification, and intraplaque hemorrhage. It demonstrates moderate to excellent correlation of different plaque characteristics with histology. Clinical data on the value of MRI in risk prediction are starting to emerge. Numerous prospective and retrospective studies have shown MRI-derived measures of plaque characteristic and burden can identify those at higher risk for future cardiovascular events. At the current time, coronary calcium scoring is the recommended imaging approach in cardiovascular risk stratification. However, as technology continues to advance, the value of ultrasound and MRI in cardiovascular risk stratification will likely increase.

Membrane-bound angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is important in regulation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, but the association of cleaved soluble ACE2 (sACE2) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is unclear. We evaluated the association of sACE2 with cardiac biomarkers, structure, and function and cardiovascular events in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. sACE2 was measured in a subset of 497 participants (mean age 78±5.4 years, 53% men, 27% black); Cox regression analyses assessed prospective associations of sACE2 with time to first CVD event at median 6.1-year follow-up. sACE2 was higher in men, blacks, and participants with prevalent CVD, diabetes, or hypertension. Higher sACE2 levels were associated with significantly higher biomarkers of cardiac injury (high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T, N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide), greater left ventricular mass index, and impaired diastolic function in linear regression analyses, and with increased risk for heart failure hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio per natural log unit increase [HR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 1.58), CVD events (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.60), and all-cause death (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.57). In an elderly biracial cohort, sACE2 was positively associated with biomarkers reflecting myocardial injury and neurohormonal activation, left ventricular mass index, impaired diastolic function, CVD, events and all-cause death.

Introduction: Membrane-bound angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) has been identified to a have prominent role in SARS-COV-2 infection and is an important counter-regulator of renin-angiotensin system. But the association of cleaved soluble ACE2 (sACE2) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains unclear. We sought to identify the association of sACE2 with cardiac biomarkers, structure, function and events in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Methods: sACE2 was measured in a subset of 497 patients from a case-control study of incident heart failure (HF) at visit 5 (2011-2013), mean age 78 (SD 5.4), 53% men and 27% black. We used linear regression to evaluate the associations of sACE2 with cardiac biomarkers (hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP) and echocardiographic parameters. We used Cox regression to evaluate associations of sACE2 with risk of HF hospitalization, global CVD events (CHD, ischemic stroke or HF hospitalization) and all-cause death. Results: Over a median follow up of 6.1 (4.6, 6.8) years, 282 global CVD events and 190 all-cause deaths occurred. sACE2 levels were higher in men, blacks, those with prevalent CVD, diabetes and hypertension. Higher sACE2 levels were associated with significantly higher hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP levels, greater left ventricular (LV) mass index, impaired diastolic function ( Table ) and increased risk for HF hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.32 per log unit increase, 95% CI 1.10-1.58), global CVD events (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.13-1.60) and all-cause death (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01-1.57). Conclusions: In an elderly biracial cohort, sACE2 was positively associated with biomarkers reflecting myocardial injury and neurohormonal activation, LV mass index, impaired diastolic function, CVD events and all-cause death. Future research is needed to elucidate the significance of sACE2 in development of CVD, not only in patients with SAR—COV2 infection, but the general population

Purpose of Review The review highlights selected studies related to cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention that were presented at the 2020 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress—The Digital Experience. Recent Findings The studies reviewed include clinical trials on novel RNA interference-based lipid-lowering therapies AKCEA-APOCIII-LRx and vupanorsen (AKCEA-ANGPTL3-LRx); the EVAPORATE trial assessing the effects of icosapent ethyl on coronary plaque volume progression; the LoDoCo2 trial evaluating the efficacy of low-dose colchicine in cardiovascular disease risk reduction among patients with chronic coronary artery disease; as well as the EMPEROR-Reduced trial evaluating cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. In addition, we review the BPLTTC analysis on blood pressure treatment across blood pressure levels and CVD status and discuss findings from the BRACE CORONA study that examined continuing versus suspending angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blockers in patients on these antihypertensive medications who were hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. Summary The studies presented at the 2020 digital ESC Congress highlight the continuing advancements in the field of CVD prevention.

BACKGROUND Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is prescribed for left atrial thrombi (LAT) in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or atrial flutter (AFL). The study objective was to review the existing evidence regarding LAT resolution in nonrheumatic AF and/or AFL with OAC agents. METHODS Data sources included PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 1991 and February 10, 2017. English-language studies that assessed LAT resolution with OAC agents in subjects with nonrheumatic AF and/or AFL, by serial transesophageal echocardiography, and with follow-up times ≥ 3 weeks and

Pulse pressure (PP), a marker of arterial stiffness, and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) have been associated with heart failure (HF) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). We examined whether the combination of PP and NT-proBNP identifies individuals at higher risk for

BACKGROUND: Baseline predictors of myocardial recovery after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in left bundle branch block (LBBB)‐associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) are unknown. METHODS: A retrospective study included subjects with idiopathic NICM, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and LBBB. Myocardial recovery was defined as post‐CRT LVEF ≥50%. Logistic regression analyses described associations between baseline characteristics and myocardial recovery. Cox regression analyses estimated the hazard ratio (HR) between myocardial recovery status and adverse clinical events. RESULTS: In 105 subjects (mean age 61 years, 44% male, mean initial LVEF 22.6% ± 6.6%, 81% New York Heart Association class III, and 98% CRT‐defibrillators), myocardial recovery after CRT was observed in 56 (54%) subjects. Hypertension, heart rate, and serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) had negative associations with myocardial recovery in univariable analyses. These associations persisted in multivariable analysis: hypertension (odds ratio (OR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17–0.95; p = 0.04), heart rate (OR per 10 bpm, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48–0.997; p = 0.048), and serum BUN (OR per 1 mg/dl, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88–0.99; p = 0.04). Subjects with post‐CRT LVEF ≥50%, when compared to

In a population with newly diagnosed, nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who were 98.3% male and 88.9% white, Perino et al. [(1)][1] reported lower mortality, despite higher rates of cardiovascular comorbidities, in patients who received cardiology care when compared with primary care. Those who