Search

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) following an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) poses significant management challenges, exacerbated by inflammatory responses and infectious complications. This study investigates the microbiological profiles and impacts of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) on inflammation and infection in OHCA patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed microbiological data from various specimens of 372 OHCA patients, who were treated at the Cardiac Arrest Center of the University Hospital of Marburg from January 2018 to December 2022. Clinical outcomes were evaluated to investigate the potential impact of MCS on infection and inflammation. Results: Of the study cohort, 115 patients received MCS. The microbiological analysis revealed a higher incidence of positive blood cultures in the MCS group vs. the non-MCS group (39% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.037), with predominantly Gram-positive bacteria. Patients with positive microbiological findings had longer in-hospital stays and prolonged periods of mechanical ventilation. The levels of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) differed, suggesting a more pronounced inflammatory response in MCS patients, especially in the later ICU stages. Notably, despite the higher infection rate in the MCS group, the survival rates did not significantly differ in the two groups. Conclusions: MCS appears to influence the microbiological and inflammatory landscape in OHCA patients, increasing the susceptibility to certain infections but not affecting the overall mortality. This study underscores the complexity of managing post-resuscitation care and highlights the need for tailored therapeutic strategies to effectively mitigate infectious and inflammatory complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction or failure occurs in more than 30% of patients in cardiogenic shock (CS). However, the importance of timely diagnosis of prognostically relevant impairment of RV function is often underestimated. Moreover, data regarding the impact of mechanical circulatory support like the Impella on RV function are rare. Here, we investigated the effects of the left ventricular (LV) Impella on RV function. Moreover, we aimed to identify the most optimal and the earliest applicable parameter for bedside monitoring of RV function by comparing the predictive abilities of three common RV function parameters: the pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), the ratio of right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (RA/PCWP), and the right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI). Methods: The data of 50 patients with CS complicating myocardial infarction, supported with different flow levels of LV Impella, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Enhancing Impella flow (1.5 to 2.5 L/min ± 0.4 L/min) did not lead to a significant variation in PAPi (p = 0.717), RA/PCWP (p = 0.601), or RVSWI (p = 0.608), indicating no additional burden for the RV. PAPi revealed the best ability to connect RV function with global hemodynamic parameters, i.e., cardiac index (CI; p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.181–0.663), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP; p = 0.005, 95% CI: −6.721–−1.26), central venous pressure (CVP; p < 0.001, 95% CI: −7.89–5.575), and indicators of tissue perfusion (central venous oxygen saturation (SvO2); p = 0.008, 95% CI: 1.096–7.196). Conclusions: LV Impella does not impair RV function. Moreover, PAPi seems to be to the most effective and valid predictor for early bedside monitoring of RV function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In severe cardiogenic shock, for example, following cardiac arrest, the implantation of an extracorporeal hemodynamic assist device often seems to be the last option to save a patient's life. However, even though our guidelines provide a class-IIa-recommendation to implant a veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO) device in these patients, the accompanying disease- and device-associated complications and their consequences remain challenging to handle. Case presentation: A 43-year-old patient presented with severe cardiogenic-septic shock with a complicating abdominal compartment due to a prolonged out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). A loss of function of the vaECMO, implanted immediately after admission, impended due to increasing intra-abdominal pressure. This dangerous situation was resolved by crafting an experimental "arterio-venous shunt," using the side port of the reinfusion (arterial) vaECMO cannula and a downstream large-volume central access in the right femoral vein toward the abdominal venous system, which led to the patient's full recovery. Conclusion: In patients with cardiogenic shock, the use of catecholamines and implantation of extracorporeal assist devices alone do not ensure successful therapy. To optimize the outcome, device- and disease-associated complications must also be managed in a timely and minimally invasive procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute kidney injury is one of the most frequent and prognostically relevant complications in cardiogenic shock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of the Impella® pump on hemodynamics and renal organ perfusion in patients with myocardial infarction complicating cardiogenic shock. Between January 2020 and February 2022 patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock supported with the Impella® pump were included in this single-center prospective short-term study. Changes in hemodynamics on different levels of Impella® support were documented with invasive pulmonal arterial catheter. As far as renal function is concerned, renal perfusion was assessed by determining the renal resistive index (RRI) using Doppler sonography. A total of 50 patients were included in the analysis. The increase in the Impella® output by a mean of 1.0 L/min improved the cardiac index (2.7 ± 0.86 to 3.3 ± 1.1 p < 0.001) and increased central venous oxygen saturation (62.6 ± 11.8% to 67.4 ± 10.5% p < 0.001). On the other side, the systemic vascular resistance (1035 ± 514 N·s/m5 to 902 ± 371 N·s/m5p = 0.012) and the RRI were significantly reduced (0.736 ± 0.07 to 0.62 ± 0.07 p < 0.001). Furthermore, in the overall cohort, a baseline RRI ≥ 0.8 was associated with a higher frequency of renal replacement therapy (71% vs. 39% p = 0.04), whereas the consequent reduction of the RRI below 0.7 during Impella® support improved the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) during hospital stay (15 ± 3 days; 53 ± 16 mL/min to 83 ± 16 mL/min p = 0.04). Impella® support in patients with cardiogenic shock seems to improve hemodynamics and renal organ perfusion. The RRI, a well-known parameter for the early detection of acute kidney injury, can be directly influenced by the Impella® flow rate. Thus, a targeted control of the RRI by the Impella® pump could mediate renal organ protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although scoring systems are widely used to predict outcomes in postcardiac arrest cardiogenic shock (CS) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI), data concerning the accuracy of these scores to predict mortality of patients treated with Impella in this setting are lacking. Thus, we aimed to evaluate as well as to compare the prognostic accuracy of acute physiology and chronic health II (APACHE II), simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA), the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), CardShock, the prediction of cardiogenic shock outcome for AMI patients salvaged by VA-ECMO (ENCOURAGE), and the survival after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (SAVE) score in patients with OHCA refractory CS due to an AMI treated with Impella 2.5 or CP.Methods: Retrospective study of 65 consecutive Impella 2.5 and 32 CP patients treated in our cardiac arrest center from September 2015 until June 2020.Results: Overall survival to discharge was 44.3%. The expected mortality according to scores was SOFA 70%, SAPS II 90%, IABP shock 55%, CardShock 80%, APACHE II 85%, ENCOURAGE 50%, and SAVE score 70% in the 2.5 group; SOFA 70%, SAPS II 85%, IABP shock 55%, CardShock 80%, APACHE II 85%, ENCOURAGE 75%, and SAVE score 70% in the CP group. The ENCOURAGE score was the most effective predictive model of mortality outcome presenting a moderate area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79, followed by the CardShock, APACHE II, IABP, and SAPS score. These derived an AUC between 0.71 and 0.78. The SOFA and the SAVE scores failed to predict the outcome in this particular setting of refractory CS after OHCA due to an AMI.Conclusion: The available intensive care and newly developed CS scores offered only a moderate prognostic accuracy for outcomes in OHCA patients with refractory CS due to an AMI treated with Impella. A new score is needed in order to guide the therapy in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe acute heart failure requires immediate intensive care unit ( ICU) treatment, but prognosis and outcome of further treatment regimens largely depends on the preprocedural status of the patient. Especially, multiorgan failure including mechanical ventilation are unfavorable predictors of clinical outcome. Here, we report a strategy of immediate initiation of extracorporeal life support ( ECLS) in awake and spontaneously breathing patients with acute heart failure to achieve early multiorgan recovery and gain sufficient time for further treatment planning. Twenty-three patients with severe cardiac failure refractory to standard medical management underwent ECLS treatment, after first clinical signs of cardiac failure appeared to avoid mechanical ventilation. Hemodynamic parameters and renal and liver functions were monitored. Outcome at 1 and 6 months was determined. Patients 46.1 ± 15.5 years of age were placed on ECLS due to various underlying diagnosis: ischemic heart disease ( n = 6), dilatative cardiomyopathy ( n = 4), myocarditis ( n = 2), graft failure following heart transplantation ( n = 6), or other diseases ( n = 5). ECLS lasted 11.9 ± 12.9 days. Hemodynamic stabilization was achieved immediately after ECLS initiation. Vasopressors were reduced subsequently and the cardiac situation improved indicated by central venous saturation, which increased from 38.5 ± 11.3% before to 74.26 ± 8.4% ( P < 0.0001) 24 h after ECLS initiation. Similarly, serum lactate levels decreased from 4.7 ± 4.6 to 1.7 ± 1.51 mmol/L ( P = 0.003). Cumulative 30-day survival was 87.5%, and 6-month survival was 70.8%. In acute cardiac failure, early ECLS treatment is a safe, feasible treatment in awake patients allowing a gain of time for final decision. Moreover, this strategy avoids complications associated with sedation and mechanical ventilation and leads to recovery of secondary organ function, enabling destination therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our aim was to compare the outcomes of Impella with extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in patients with post-cardiac arrest cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This was a retrospective study of patients resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with post-cardiac arrest CS following AMI (May 2015 to May 2020). Patients were supported either with Impella 2.5/CP or ECLS. Outcomes were compared using propensity score-matched analysis to account for differences in baseline characteristics between groups. 159 patients were included (Impella, n = 105; ECLS, n = 54). Hospital and 12-month survival rates were comparable in the Impella and the ECLS groups (p = 0.16 and p = 0.3, respectively). After adjustment for baseline differences, both groups demonstrated comparable hospital and 12-month survival (p = 0.36 and p = 0.64, respectively). Impella patients had a significantly greater left ventricle ejection-fraction (LVEF) improvement at 96 h (p < 0.01 vs. p = 0.44 in ECLS) and significantly fewer device-associated complications than ECLS patients (15.2% versus 35.2%, p < 0.01 for relevant access site bleeding, 7.6% versus 20.4%, p = 0.04 for limb ischemia needing intervention). In subgroup analyses, Impella was associated with better survival in patients with lower-risk features (lactate < 8.6 mmol/L, time from collapse to return of spontaneous circulation < 28 min, vasoactive score < 46 and Horowitz index > 182). In conclusion, the use of Impella 2.5/CP or ECLS in post-cardiac arrest CS after AMI was associated with comparable adjusted hospital and 12-month survival. Impella patients had a greater LVEF improvement than ECLS patients. Device-related access-site complications occurred more frequently in patients with ECLS than Impella support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although the use of microaxilar mechanical circulatory support systems may improve the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), little is known about its effect on the long-term structural integrity of left ventricular (LV) valves as well as on the development of LV-architecture. Therefore, we aimed to study the integrity of the LV valves and architecture and function after Impella support. Thus, 84 consecutive patients were monitored over two years having received ImpellaTM CP (n = 24) or 2.5 (n = 60) for refractory CS (n = 62) or for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (n = 22) followed by optimal medical treatment. Beside a significant increase in LV ejection fraction after two years (p ≤ 0.03 vs. pre-implantation), we observed a statistically significant decrease in LV dilation (p < 0.001) and severity of mitral valve regurgitation (p = 0.007) in the two-year follow-up period, suggesting an improved LV architecture. Neither the duration of support, nor the size of the Impella device or the indication for its use revealed any devastating impact on aortic or mitral valve integrity. These findings indicate that Impella device is a safe means of support of LV-function without detrimental long-term effects on the structural integrity of LV valves regardless of the size of the device or the indication of support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become integral component in the therapy of refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS), we identified 67 patients in biventricular support with Impella and venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for RCS between February 2013 and December 2019 and evaluated the risk factors of mortality in this setting. Mean age was 61.07 ± 10.7 and 54 (80.6%) patients were male. Main cause of RCS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (74.6%), while 44 (65.7%) were resuscitated prior to admission. The mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA) score on admission was 73.54 ± 16.03 and 12.25 ± 2.71, respectively, corresponding to an expected mortality of higher than 80%. Vasopressor doses and lactate levels were significantly decreased within 72 h on biventricular support (p < 0.05 for both). Overall, 17 (25.4%) patients were discharged to cardiac rehabilitation and 5 patients (7.5%) were bridged successfully to ventricular assist device implantation, leading to a total of 32.8% survival on hospital discharge. The 6-month survival was 31.3%. Lactate > 6 mmol/L, vasoactive score > 100 and pH < 7.26 on initiation of biventricular support, as well as Charlson comorbity index > 3 and prior resuscitation were independent predictors of survival. In conclusion, biventricular support with Impella and VA-ECMO in patients with RCS is feasible and efficient leading to a better survival than predicted through traditional risk scores, mainly via significant hemodynamic improvement and reduction in lactate levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

REFERENCES 1 Hiroi S, Imamura T. Implication of Early Impella Support in Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction. In addition, the further management of all patients until Impella implantation (including type of inotropic and vasoactive agents, mechanical ventilation and sedatives) was made according to institutionally predefined operating procedures and, therefore, uniformly in all patients. 2021; 49:, e1274 2 Chatzis G, Markus B, Luesebrink U. Early Impella support in postcardiac arrest cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction improves short- and long-term survival. [Extracted from the article]

Objectives: Early mechanical circulatory support with Impella may improve survival outcomes in the setting of postcardiac arrest cardiogenic shock after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest complicating acute myocardial infarction. However, the optimal timing to initiate mechanical circulatory support in this particular setting remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare survival outcomes of patients supported with Impella 2.5 before percutaneous coronary intervention (pre-PCI) with those supported after percutaneous coronary intervention (post-PCI).Design: Retrospective single-center study between September 2014 and December 2019 admitted to the Cardiac Arrest Center in Marburg, Germany.Patients: Out of 2,105 patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to acute myocardial infarction with postcardiac arrest cardiogenic shock between September 2014 and December 2019 and admitted to our regional cardiac arrest center, 81 consecutive patients receiving Impella 2.5 during admission coronary angiogram were identified.Outcomes/measurements: Survival outcomes were compared between those with Impella support pre-PCI to those with support post-PCI.Main Results: A total of 81 consecutive patients with infarct-related postcardiac arrest shock supported with Impella 2.5 during admission coronary angiogram were included. All patients were in profound cardiogenic shock requiring catecholamines at admission. Overall survival to discharge and at 6 months was 40.7% and 38.3%, respectively. Patients in the pre-PCI group had a higher survival to discharge and at 6 months as compared to patients of the post-PCI group (54.3% vs 30.4%; p = 0.04 and 51.4% vs 28.2%; p = 0.04, respectively). Furthermore, the patients in the early support group demonstrated a greater functional recovery of the left ventricle and a better restoration of the end-organ function when Impella support was initiated prior to percutaneous coronary intervention.Conclusions: Our results suggest that the early initiation of mechanical circulatory support with Impella 2.5 prior to percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved hospital and 6-month survival in patients with postcardiac arrest cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To compare survival outcomes of Impella support and medical treatment in patients with post-cardiac arrest cardiogenic shock related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods: Retrospective single center study of patients resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to AMI with post-cardiac arrest cardiogenic shock between September 2014 and September 2016. Patients were either assisted with Impella or received medical treatment only. Survival outcomes were compared using propensity score-matched analysis to account for differences in baseline characteristics between both groups.Results: A total of 90 consecutive patients with post-cardiac arrest shock due to AMI were included; 27 patients in the Impella group and 63 patients in the medical treatment group. Patients with Impella support had a longer duration of low-flow time (29.54 ± 10.21 versus 17.57 ± 8.3 min, p < 0.001), higher lactate levels on admission (4.75 [IQR 3.8-11] versus 3.6 [IQR 2.6-3.9] mmol/L, p = 0.03) and lower baseline systolic LVEF (25% [IQR 25-35] versus 45% [IQR 35-51.25], p < 0.001) as compared to patients without circulatory support. After propensity score matching, patients with Impella support had a significantly higher survival to hospital discharge (65% versus 20%, p = 0.01) and 6-months survival (60% versus 20%, p = 0.02).Conclusion: The results from our study suggest that Impella support is associated with significantly better survival to hospital discharge and at 6 months compared to medical treatment in OHCA patients admitted with post-cardiac arrest cardiogenic shock and AMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Cardiogenic shock remains a clinical challenge with high mortality rate. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become an integral component of the therapeutic armamentarium expanding the treatment options for refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS). Methods We included all consecutive patients with biventricular unloading with Impella-2.5 and VA-ECMO admitted for RCS between October 2013 and March 2015. Outcome data included survival to discharge, bridging to VAD and 28-day mortality. Results A total of 17 patients were included. Mean age was 63.3 ± 10.5 and 15 (88%) patients were male. RCS resulted from acute myocardial infarction in 14 (82%), acute myocarditis in 1 (6%) dilated cardiomyopathy in 2 (12%) patients. Mean SAPS II and SOFA score on admission was 74.7 ± 16.86 and 11.16 ± 1.79, respectively. Vasopressor doses and lactate levels were significantly decreased within 72 h on biventricular support (p = 0.025 for norepinephrine and p = 0.005 for lactate). Nine (53%) patients died while on support. Of the remaining 8 patients, 5 (29%) patients were weaned successfully and discharged in cardiac rehabilitation and 3 (18%) patients were successfully bridged to VAD. All 5 patients who were discharged to rehabilitation survived at day 28 after discharge, while 1 of 3 VAD patients died after VAD implantation, corresponding to an overall 28-day survival rate of 41%. Conclusions Biventricular support with Impella-2.5 and VA-ECMO in patients with RCS is feasible and led to significant hemodynamic improvement and reduction of lactate levels. Despite high severity scores, ICU- and 28-day mortality rates were better than predicted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mechanical circulatory support represents an evolving field of clinical research and practice. Currently, several cardiac assist devices have been developed but, among different institutions and countries, a large variation in indications for use and device selection exists. The Impella platform is an easy to use percutaneous circulatory support device which is increasingly used worldwide. During 2014, we established a working group of European physicians who have collected considerable experience with the Impella device in recent years. By critically comparing the individual experiences and the operative protocols, this working group attempted to establish the best clinical practice with the technology. The present paper reviews the main theoretical principles of Impella and provides an up-to-date summary of the best practical aspects of device use which may help others gain the maximal advantage with Impella technology in a variety of clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]