Search

Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Our study aimed to gain insights into patient characteristics, outcomes and treatment strategies in CS patients. Patients with CS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2017 and 2021 were identified in a nationwide registry. Data on medical history, laboratory values, angiographic features and outcomes were retrospectively assessed. A total of 2328 patients with a mean age of 66 years and of whom 73% were male, were included. Mortality at 30 days was 39% for the entire cohort. Non-survivors presented with a lower mean blood pressure and increased heart rate, blood lactate and blood glucose levels (p-value for all <0.001). Also, an increased prevalence of diabetes, multivessel coronary artery disease and a prior coronary event were found. Of all patients, 24% received mechanical circulatory support, of which the majority was via intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs). Furthermore, 79% of patients were treated with at least one vasoactive agent, and multivessel PCI was performed in 28%. In conclusion, a large set of hemodynamic, biochemical and patient-related characteristics was identified to be associated with mortality. Interestingly, multivessel PCI and IABPs were frequently applied despite a lack of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With great pleasure, we read the well-conducted study by Schrage et al[1] in which they showed a favorable effect of left ventricular (LV) unloading via Impella as an adjunct to venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on mortality. Second, it seems as if the clinical benefit of LV unloading might be different in patients who exhibit signs of pulmonary edema versus those who do not. Cohort Study". [Extracted from the article]

It is important to gain more insight into the cardiogenic shock (CS) population, as currently, little is known on how to improve outcomes. Therefore, we assessed clinical outcome in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with and without CS at admission. Furthermore, the incidence of CS and predictors for mortality in CS patients were evaluated. The Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR) is a nationwide registry on all cardiac interventions. We used NHR data of ACS patients treated with PCI between 2015 and 2019. Among 75,407 ACS patients treated with PCI, 3028 patients (4.1%) were identified with CS, respectively 4.3%, 3.9%, 3.5%, and 4.3% per year. Factors associated with mortality in CS were age (HR 1.02, 95%CI 1.02–1.03), eGFR (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.98–0.99), diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.08–1.45), multivessel disease (HR 1.22, 95%CI 1.06–1.39), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.06–1.45), and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) (HR 1.71, 95%CI 1.50–1.94). In conclusion, in this Dutch nationwide registry-based study of ACS patients treated by PCI, the incidence of CS was 4.1% over the 4-year study period. Predictors for mortality in CS were higher age, renal insufficiency, presence of DM, multivessel disease, prior MI, and OHCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fitting this theory, patients in the delayed group died considerably more often as a consequence of cardiogenic shock, whereas at the same time, Impella support duration and length of ICU stay were considerably shorter. To the Editor: With great interest, we read a study by Chatzis et al ([1]) published in a recent issue of I Critical Care Medicine i reporting improved survival after receiving an Impella before versus after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction. Although hemodynamics commonly improve after conventional treatment ([2]) causing Impella support to be redundant in several patients, the studies' comparator arm only involved the first type of patients. [Extracted from the article]