Search

Objectives: The objectives were to analyze the long-term outcomes of tricuspid aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation and the impact of different annuloplasty techniques., Methods: The study cohort consists of 127 consecutive patients who received aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation in the tricuspid aortic valve between 1996 and 2019 in our institution. Exclusion criteria were aorta dilatation (≥45 mm), connective tissue disease, active endocarditis, type A dissection, and rheumatic disease. Mean age of patients was 55.6 ± 16 years, and 80% were male. Median follow-up was 6.4 years. Time-to-event analysis was performed, as well as risk of death, reoperation, and aortic regurgitation recurrence., Results: Cusp repair was performed in 117 patients (92%), and annuloplasty was performed in 126 patients (99%) with Cabrol stitch (73%), reimplantation technique (19.7%), or ring annuloplasty (6.3%). There was no hospital mortality. At 10 and 14 years, overall survival was 81% ± 5% and 71% ± 6%, respectively, and freedom from reoperation was 80% ± 5% and 73% ± 6%, respectively. Age and left coronary cusp repair were independent predictors of reoperation. Freedom from recurrent severe aortic regurgitation (>2+) was 73% ± 5% and 66% ± 7% at 10 and 12 years, respectively. Age, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and patch repair were independent predictors of recurrent aortic regurgitation. Type of annuloplasty had no impact on survival or reoperation., Conclusions: Aortic valve repair for isolated severe aortic regurgitation in the tricuspid aortic valve is a safe procedure, and durability at 14 years is acceptable. In this study, the annuloplasty technique did not influence repair durability as was found in bicuspid aortic valve repair or aortic valve-sparing surgery. Severity of cusp pathology seems to be the main determinant of repair durability., (Copyright © 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Root reimplantation has been the favoured approach for patients with heritable aortic disorder requiring valve-sparring root replacement. In the past few years, root remodelling with annuloplasty has emerged as an alternative to root reimplantation in the general population. The aim of this study was to examine the late outcomes of patients with heritable aortic disorder undergoing valve-sparring root replacement and compare different techniques., Methods: Using the AVIATOR registry (Aortic Valve Insufficiency and ascending aorta Aneurysm InternATiOnal Registry), data were collected from 5 North American and European centres. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to the technique of valve-sparing used (root reimplantation, root remodelling with ring annuloplasty, root remodelling with suture annuloplasty and root remodelling alone). The primary endpoints were freedom from aortic regurgitation (AR) ≥2 and freedom from reintervention on the aortic valve. Secondary endpoints were survival and changes in annular dimensions over time., Results: A total of 237 patients were included in the study (reimplantation = 100, remodelling + ring annuloplasty = 76, remodelling + suture annuloplasty = 34, remodelling alone = 27). The majority of patients had Marfan syndrome (83%). Preoperative AR ≥2 was present in 41% of the patients. Operative mortality was 0.4% (n = 1). No differences were found between techniques in terms of postoperative AR ≥2 (P = 0.58), reintervention (P = 0.52) and survival (P = 0.59). Changes in aortic annulus dimension were significantly different at 10 years (P < 0.05), a difference that started to emerge 4 years after surgery., Conclusions: Overall, valve-sparring root replacement is a safe and durable procedure in patients with heritable aortic disorder. Nevertheless, root remodelling alone is associated with late annular dilatation. The addition of an annuloplasty, however, results in similar freedom from AR, reintervention, survival and changes in annulus size compared to reimplantation., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare long-term outcomes after bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair utilizing the Cabrol annuloplasty versus valve sparing Reimplantation technique., Methods: From 1996 to 2018, 340 consecutive patients underwent BAV repair. Eighty underwent Cabrol annuloplasty and 189 underwent Reimplantation. Exclusion criteria were re-repairs (n = 6), active endocarditis (n = 4), no annuloplasty (n = 41) and ring or suture annuloplasty (n = 20). We compared both groups for survival, reoperations, valve related events and recurrent severe aortic regurgitation (AR > 2+). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to balance the 2 groups. Cox regression analysis was used to identify outcome predictors., Results: After weighting, pre- and intraoperative characteristics were similar between groups, except for aorta replacement techniques and operative time, which was longer in the Reimplantation group (P < 0.001). At 12 years, overall survival was similar between groups (IPW: Cabrol 97 ± 2% vs Reimplantation 94 ± 3%, P = 0.52). Freedom from reoperation and freedom from AR > 2+ were significantly lower in the Cabrol group (reoperation IPW: 69 ± 9% vs 91 ± 4%, P = 0.004 and AR > 2+ IPW: 71 ± 8% vs 97 ± 2%, P < 0.001). The Reimplantation technique was the only independent predictor of reoperation (hazard ratio 0.31; confidence interval 0.19-0.7; P = 0.005)., Conclusions: In this study, comparing 2 annuloplasty strategies for BAV repair, we found statistically significant differences in long-term durability favouring the Reimplantation technique, and no differences in overall survival. The results support our current strategy of Reimplantation technique and repair of AR in patients with BAV. Cabrol annuloplasty is obsolete and should be generally abandoned in patients undergoing BAV repair for AR., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The optimal management of functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) in the setting of mitral valve operations remains controversial. The current practice is both centre specific and surgeon specific with guidelines based on non-randomized data. A prospective randomized trial was performed to evaluate the worth of less-than-severe FTR repair during mitral valve procedures., Methods: A single-centre randomized study was designed to allocate patients with less-than-severe FTR undergoing mitral valve surgery to be prophylactically treated with or without tricuspid valve annuloplasty (TVP- or TVP+). These patients were analysed using longitudinal cardiopulmonary exercise capacity, echocardiographic follow-up and cardiac magnetic resonance. The primary outcome was freedom from more than or equal to moderate tricuspid regurgitation with vena contracta ≥4 mm. Secondary outcomes were maximal oxygen uptake and right ventricular (RV) dimension and function., Results: A total of 53 patients were allocated to receive concomitant TVP+, and 53 patients were treated conservatively (TVP-). At 5 years, tricuspid regurgitation was observed to be greater than mild in 10 patients in the TVP- group and no patients in the TVP+ group (P < 0.01). Maximal oxygen uptake, RV basal diameter, end-diastolic diameter and end-systolic diameter and fractional area changes were similar in both groups. Cardiac magnetic resonance confirmed no differences in RV end-diastolic volume, RV end-systolic volume and RV ejection fraction., Conclusions: This single-centre prospective randomized trial demonstrated that prophylactic tricuspid annuloplasty irrespective of annular dilatation at the time of mitral surgery reduced the recurrence of moderate or severe FTR at 5-year follow-up and reduced the pulmonary pressure. Nevertheless, the functional capacity, the RV function and the RV dimension remained similar., (© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Failure to address the functional aortic annulus during bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair has led to early repair failures. The pathology of regurgitant BAV involves annular dilatation, which is more pronounced anteriorly and deep toward the muscular interventricular septum. In this study, we assessed the results of BAV repair using a strategy of deep circumferential annular support involving the septum in patients with a dilated annulus (>26 mm) and moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (AR)., Methods: Between February 1999 and June 2015, 100 patients with regurgitant (≥2+) BAV and a dilated ventriculoaortic junction (VAJ) (≥26 mm) underwent repair with an adjunctive circumferential annuloplasty (reimplantation procedure or ring). External root dissection to accommodate the annuloplasty was carried deep onto the anterior aspect of the interventricular septum. Follow up was complete in 96 patients, with a median follow-up of 31 months and a total of 362 patient-years. Cox regression analysis was used to predict recurrence of AR., Results: The mean VAJ diameter was 30 ± 4 mm. Seventy-nine patients exhibited delayed prolapse of the anterior leaflet (conjoined right and left cusps in Siever type 1 or anterior cusp in Siever type 0), and 93 patients underwent reimplantation. In the entire study group, there were no in-hospital deaths, and only 1 patient had 2+ AR on discharge. There was 1 late noncardiac death. At 8 years, freedom from AR ≥2+ was 96.4% and freedom from reoperation was 96.8%. Higher preoperative AR grade, small graft size, and use of a ring were predictive of recurrent AR., Conclusions: Regurgitant BAVs with a dilated annulus display anterior cusp prolapse toward the septum. A deep circumferential annuloplasty may help maintain repair durability., (Copyright © 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Valve sparing reimplantation can improve the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair compared with subcommissural annuloplasty, especially in patients with a large basal ring. This study analyses the effect of basal ring size and annuloplasty on valve repair in the setting of a tricuspid aortic valve., Methods: From 1995 to 2013, 382 patients underwent elective tricuspid aortic valve repair. We included only those undergoing subcommissural annuloplasty, valve sparing reimplantation or no annuloplasty and in whom intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography images were available for retrospective pre- and post-repair basal ring measurements (n = 323, subcommissural annuloplasty: 146, valve sparing reimplantation: 154, no annuloplasty: 23). In a subgroup of patients with available echocardiographic images, basal ring was retrospectively measured at the latest follow-up or prior to reoperation. subcommissural annuloplasty and valve sparing reimplantation were compared after matching for degree of aortic regurgitation and root size., Results: All three groups differed significantly for most of preoperative characteristics. Hospital mortality was 0.9%. The median follow-up was 4.7 years. At 8 years, overall survival was 80 ± 5%. Freedom from reoperation and freedom from aortic regurgitation >1+ were 92 ± 5% and 71 ± 8%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, predictors of aortic regurgitation >1+ were left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P = 0.003), cusp repair (P = 0.006), body surface area (P = 0.01) and subcommissural annuloplasty (P = 0.05). In subcommissural annuloplasty, freedom from aortic regurgitation >1+ was lower for patients with basal ring ≥28 mm compared with patients with basal ring <28 mm (P = 0.0001). In valve sparing reimplantation, freedom from aortic regurgitation >1+ was independent of basal ring size (P = 0.38). In matched comparison between subcommissural annuloplasty and valve sparing reimplantation, freedom from aortic regurgitation >1+ was not significantly different (P = 0.06), but in patients with basal ring ≥28 mm, valve sparing reimplantation was superior to subcommissural annuloplasty (P = 0.04). Despite similar intraoperative reduction in basal ring size in subcommissural annuloplasty and valve sparing reimplantation, patients with subcommissural annuloplasty exhibited greater increase in basal ring size during the follow-up compared with the valve sparing reimplantation group (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: As with a bicuspid aortic valve, a large basal ring predicts recurrence of aortic regurgitation in patients with tricuspid aortic valve undergoing repair with the subcommissural annuloplasty technique. This recurrence is caused by basal ring dilatation over time after subcommissural annuloplasty. With the valve sparing reimplantation technique, large basal ring did not predict aortic regurgitation recurrence, as prosthetic-based circumferential annuloplasty displayed better stability over time. Stable circumferential annuloplasty is recommended in tricuspid aortic valve repair whenever the basal ring size is ≥28 mm., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: To enhance the reproducibility of aortic valve-sparing reimplantation and annuloplasty, we analyzed the topographic relationship between the ventriculoaortic junction (VAJ), basal ring (BR), and sinotubular junction (STJ). The root base thickness is also quantified., Method: Fifty-eight fresh human aortic valves were analyzed. The root was dissected to the limit where the aortic wall terminates into the cardiac structures (VAJ). Root height was measured externally from the STJ to the VAJ and internally from the STJ to the BR defined as the plane passing through the cusps nadir. The root base thickness was measured at the BR and orthogonal to the internal wall; except at the right coronary sinus, where it was measured between the BR internally and the VAJ externally. Measurements were taken at the middle of the 3 sinuses and commissures., Results: The VAJ is at the same level as the BR from the noncoronary sinus (-0.1 ± 0.9 mm) to the left coronary sinus (0.5 ± 1.3 mm); it is above the BR from the left/right commissure (4.6 ± 1.4 mm) to the right/non commissure (2.5 ± 1.6 mm). The external root height was highest at the non/left commissure (21.5 ± 2.6 mm) followed by the right/non commissure (19.2 ± 2.3 mm) then the left/right commissure (15.7 ± 2.2 mm) (P < .05). The mean root base thickness was 3.2 mm, ranging from 1 ± 0 mm at the left/non commissure to 6.2 ± 1.2 mm at the right coronary sinus (P < .001)., Conclusions: The VAJ is not planar; it is above the level of the BR from the left/right to the right/non commissure. As a consequence, the external height of the non/left commissure is greater than the other 2 commissures. These findings should be taken into consideration when performing aortic valve-sparing reimplantation or external annuloplasty., (Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We have recently shown that valve sparing reimplantation (VSR) improves the durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair in comparison with subcommissural annuloplasty. The aim of this study was to assess the degree of annular reduction provided by these techniques and to correlate these findings with repair durability., Methods: From 1995 to 2010, 161 patients underwent bicuspid valve repair. We included only patients with subcommissural annuloplasty or reimplantation having intraoperative pre- and post-repair transoesophageal echocardiography images. Pre- and post-repair ventriculo-aortic junction (VAJ) diameters were measured on long axis views. Inclusion criteria were met by 53 patients with subcommissual annuloplasty and 65 with reimplantation. Median follow-up was 53 months in the subcommissual annuloplasty group and 42 months in the reimplantation group. Follow-up completeness was 100% in subcommissural annuloplasty and 94% in reimplantation., Results: There was no operative or late mortality. Mean preoperative VAJ was similar in both groups (reimplantation: 28 ± 3 mm vs subcommissural annuloplasty: 28 ± 3, P = 0.16). Preoperative VAJ was larger in patients <40 years and with aortic regurgitation (AR) ≥ 3+ (P < 0.01). Mean postoperative VAJ was smaller in reimplantation compared with subcommissural annuloplasty (21 ± 2 mm vs 24 ± 3 mm, P < 0.01). In univariate analyses, subcommissural annuloplasty, preoperative VAJ ≥ 30 mm, postoperative VAJ ≥ 25 mm and cusp repair with patch were predictive of recurrent AR > 1+. In the subcommissural annuloplasty group, VAJ≥ 30 mm preoperatively and ≥ 25 mm postoperatively were associated with decreased 6 years freedom from recurrent AR>1+ (<30 mm: 74% vs ≥ 30 mm: 39%, P = 0.01; <25 mm: 80% vs ≥ 25 mm 31%, P = 0.02) In the reimplantation group, VAJ dimension had no effect on recurrent AR >1+ (P = 0.93)., Conclusions: In bicuspid aortic valve repair, the circumferential annuloplasty of VSR offers greater reduction of VAJ compared with the non-circumferential annuloplasty provided by the subcommissural annuloplasty. The degree and extent of VAJ reduction in reimplantation seem to be factors among others that positively influence repair durability particularly in patients with a large VAJ (≥ 30 mm).

A 43-year-old man with Marfan syndrome presented with recurrent aortic root dilatation and aortic regurgitation at ten years after a remodeling (Yacoub) procedure. Herein is described a reoperative valve-sparing procedure employing the reimplantation technique (David procedure) used in the treatment of this patient.

Objectives: In aortic valve repair, reduction and stabilization of the ventriculo-aortic junction (VAJ) is generally recommended. In this in vitro study, we compare three techniques of annuloplasty: the subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA), the internal ring (IR) and the external ring (ER) annuloplasty., Methods: Ten fresh porcine aortic valve preparations were tested in a pulsatile mock loop. Each sample was tested untreated (baseline: B). The annuloplasty techniques were then performed successively in each sample. Each technique was tested, then removed and the following technique performed. SCA was applied at 50% of interleaflet triangle height; the ER and IR were applied with a moderate reduction (15-20%) of the VAJ. Hydrodynamic, video and echographic parameters were collected. Flow rate and arterial pressure were maintained consistently between groups., Results: Effective orifice area decreased significantly with each annuloplasty technique compared with baseline (P < 0.001). Mean transvalvular pressure drop was significantly higher in the ER and IR vs SCA (P = 0.007). Annuloplasty reduced valve opening and closing time in comparison to baseline. Echocardiography confirmed that the VAJ experienced a greater reduction with the ER and IR vs SCA. A narrowing of the lower third of the sinuses of Valsalva was observed after the ER, and subvalvular narrowing was observed after the IR. Valve coaptation increased with all annuloplasty techniques., Conclusions: The three annuloplasty techniques examined demonstrated differential effects on aortic valve function and root morphology. The ER and IR have greater potential to reduce VAJ diameter in comparison to SCA. The IR induced a subvalvular remodelling of the VAJ, whereas the ER induced a paravalvular remodelling.