Search

Although the occurrence of intraoperative cardiac arrest is rare, it is a severe adverse event with a high mortality rate. Trauma patients have additional causes for intraoperative arrest, and we hypothesised that the survival of trauma patients who experienced intraoperative cardiac arrest would be worse than nontrauma patients who experienced intraoperative cardiac arrest.The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of trauma and nontrauma patients after intraoperative cardiac arrest.In a tertiary university hospital and trauma centre, the intraoperative cardiac arrest cases were evaluated from January 2007 to December 2009, excluding patients submitted to cardiac surgery. Data were prospectively collected using the Utstein-style. Outcomes among the patients with trauma were compared to the patients without trauma.We collected data from 81 consecutive intraoperative cardiac arrest cases: 32 with trauma and 49 without trauma. Patients in the trauma group were younger than the patients in the nontrauma group (44±23 vs. 63±17, p0.001). Hypovolaemia (63% vs. 35%, p=0.022) and metabolic/hydroelectrolytic disturbances (41% vs. 2%, p0.001) were more likely to cause the cardiac arrest in the trauma group. The first documented arrest rhythm did not differ between the groups, and pulseless electrical activity was the most prevalent rhythm (66% vs. 53%, p=0.698). The return of spontaneous circulation (47% vs. 63%, p=0.146) and survival to discharge with favourable neurological outcome (16% vs. 14%, p=0.869) did not differ between the two groups.The outcomes did not differ between patients with trauma and nontrauma intraoperative cardiac arrest.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Although advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques have reduced perioperative morbidity-mortality, the survival rate following cardiac arrest remains low. The aim of this study was to evaluate, over the course of one year, the prevalence of intraoperative cardiac arrest and the 30-day survival rate after this event in a tertiary teaching hospital. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort study in a tertiary teaching hospital. METHODS: Following approval by the institutional ethics committee, anesthetic procedures and cases of intraoperative cardiac arrest between January and December 2007 were evaluated. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery were excluded. The data were gathered prospectively using the modified Utstein model, with evaluation of demographic data, pre-arrest conditions, intraoperative care, care during arrest and postoperative outcome up to the 30th day. The data were recorded by the attending anesthesiologist. RESULTS: During the study period, 40,379 anesthetic procedures were performed, and 52 cases of intraoperative cardiac arrest occurred (frequency of 13:10,000). Among these, 69% presented spontaneous return of circulation after the initial arrest, and only 25% survived for 30 days after the event. The following factors were associated with shorter survival: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status IV and V, emergency surgery, hemorrhagic events, hypovolemia as the cause of arrest and use of atropine during resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: Although the frequency of cardiac arrest in the surgical environment has declined and resources to attend to this exist, the survival rate is low. Factors associated with worst prognosis are more frequent in critical patients.