Search

Aims: We aimed to evaluate within the MADIT-CRT database whether different enrollment characteristics between US and non-US centres affected the clinical course of study patients., Methods and Results: We evaluated differences in baseline characteristics, procedure-associated complications, clinical as well as echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D), between patients enrolled in 87 US centres (n = 1271) and 23 non-US centres (n = 549) in MADIT-CRT. Non-US patients displayed significant differences in baseline characteristics from US patients, including a higher frequency of left bundle branch block, a more advanced heart failure (HF) functional class >3 months prior to enrollment, and larger baseline cardiac volumes. Procedure-related complications occurred at a significantly higher frequency among patients enrolled in non-US centres (17%) than among those enrolled in US centres (10%; P < 0.001). During follow-up, CRT-D was associated with 42% (P = 0.003) and 38% (P < 0.001) reductions in the risk of HF or death in the two respective groups (P for the difference = 0.80), and with similar reductions in cardiac volumes (all P > 0.10). Subgroup analysis showed a more pronounced effect of CRT-D among women in the US group, including a significant 71% (P = 0.02) reduction in the risk of death, whereas CRT-D therapy was associated with a significant clinical benefit in men only in the non-US group., Conclusion: Patients enrolled in US and non-US centres in MADIT-CRT displayed significant differences in baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics and in the frequency of procedure-related complications, but experienced an overall similar clinical and echocardiographic response to CRT-D.

Background: Securing transvenous left ventricular (LV) pacing leads without an active fixation mechanism in proximal coronary vein (CV) segments is usually challenging and frequently impossible. We investigated how active fixation leads can be safely implanted in this location, how to avoid perforating the free wall of the CV, and how to recognize and respond to perforations. Materials and Methods: In five patients with no alternative to LV pacing from proximal CV segments, 4 Fr SelectSecure (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) leads, which have a fixed helix, were implanted through a modified 6 Fr guide catheter with a pre-shaped tip (Launcher, Medtronic). Results: Active fixation leads were successfully implanted in proximal CVs in five patients. There were no complications. Acute and chronic pacing thresholds were comparable to those of conventional CV leads. The pre-shaped guide catheter tip remains in close proximity to the myocardial aspect of the CV, directing the lead helix toward a safe implantation site. Conclusions: If only proximal CV pacing sites are available, 4 Fr SelectSecure leads can be safely implanted through a modified Launcher guide catheter, avoiding more invasive implantation techniques. Other than venous stenting or implantation of leads with retractable tines, SelectSecure leads are expected to remain extractable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resynchronization of segmental left ventricular mechanics as well as re-coordination of both atrio-ventricular and inter-ventricular contraction are potential mechanisms responsible for the clinical benefit observed in patients with advanced congestive heart failure treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Initially electrical conduction problems, in the majority of cases a left bundle branch block (LBBB), were considered the target for CRT. However, growing experience with CRT in different patient populations including those with only a mild degree of conduction disturbance, and improved cardiac imaging utilizing the tissue Doppler approach have shown the complexity of CRT and the usefulness of sophisticated echocardiographic imaging techniques for therapeutic decision making. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]