Search

Aims: We aimed to assess the effect of cardiac resynchronization on left ventricular (LV) function, volumes, geometry, and mechanics in order to demonstrate reverse remodelling using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with resynchronization on., Methods and Results: New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-III patients on optimal medical therapy with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and complete LBBB with broad QRS (>150 ms) were prospectively recruited. Cardiac magnetic resonance examination was performed at baseline and at 6-month follow-up, applying both biventricular and AOO pacing. The following data were measured: conventional CMR parameters, remodelling indices, global longitudinal, circumferential, radial strain, global dyssynchrony [mechanical dispersion (MD) defined as the standard deviation of time to peak longitudinal/circumferential strain in 16 LV segments], and regional dyssynchrony (maximum differences in time between peak septal and lateral transversal displacement). Thirteen patients (64 ± 7 years, 38% male) were enrolled. Comparing the baseline and follow-up CMR parameters measured during biventricular pacing, significant increase in LVEF, and decrease in LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) were found. Left ventricular remodelling indices, global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain values showed significant improvement. Circumferential MD decreased (20.5 ± 5.5 vs. 13.4 ± 3.4, P < 0.001), while longitudinal MD did not change. Regional dyssynchrony drastically improved (362 ± 96 vs. 104 ± 66 ms, P < 0.001). Applying AOO pacing resulted in an immediate deterioration in LVEF, LVESVi, circumferential strain, global and regional dyssynchrony., Conclusion: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging during biventricular pacing is feasible and enables a more precise quantification of LV function, morphology, and mechanics. As a result, it may contribute to a better understanding of the effects of resynchronization therapy and might improve responder rate in the future., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: While improvement in quality of life (QoL) has been widely reported in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients, its predictive value is not well-understood. We aimed to assess the predictive role of baseline QoL on long-term heart failure (HF) or death events in mild HF patients enrolled in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT)., Methods and Results: A total of 1791 of 1820 patients had their QoL evaluated at baseline, using the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires (KCCQ). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariate Cox models were utilized. Issues within any of the domains of the baseline EQ-5D questionnaire (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) were associated with long-term mortality (median follow-up 5.6 years) (all P < 0.05). Heart failure or death events were predicted by issues in baseline mobility [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.41, P < 0.001], usual activities (HR = 1.41, P < 0.001), and anxiety/depression (HR = 1.21, P = 0.035). The risk of HF events alone was significantly higher in patients with baseline mobility issues (HR = 1.42, P < 0.001) or usual activity (HR = 1.35, P = 0.003). Every 10% increase in the visual analogue scale (0-100) was associated with an 8% lower risk of all-cause mortality (P = 0.006), and a 6% lower risk of HF/death (P = 0.002). Mobility issues also predicted echocardiographic reverse remodelling (-33.08 mL vs. -31.17 mL, P = 0.043). Using the KCCQ, patients in the lower tertile of the clinical summary or physical limitations score had a significantly higher risk of long-term HF or death (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: In mild HF patients enrolled in MADIT-CRT, multiple baseline QoL questionnaire domains were predictors of echocardiographic remodelling, long-term all-cause mortality, and HF events., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Objectives: The authors aimed to evaluate the association of left ventricular (LV) lead location and long-term outcomes in MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)., Background: There is limited data on the association of lead location with long-term clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D)., Methods: The LV lead location was classified in 797 patients with CRT-D, in 569 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), in 228 patients with non-LBBB, and in 505 patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) only. Leads were classified into apical (n = 83) and non-apical (n = 486); with the non-apical LV leads further categorized into anterior (n = 99) and posterior/lateral (n = 387) within LBBB. All-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) events were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses., Results: In CRT-D patients with LBBB and posterior/lateral LV lead location, there was an association with a significant reduction in long-term all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37 to 0.79; p = 0.001), and HF events (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.60; p < 0.001) compared to an ICD only, accompanied with better LV reverse remodeling. CRT-D patients with LBBB and an anterior LV lead location were shown to be associated with a significant reduction in HF events compared to an ICD only (anterior HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.82; p = 0.006); however, no association with mortality reduction was observed from CRT-D versus an ICD only. CRT-D was not associated with improved outcomes in non-LBBB patients, regardless of LV lead location., Conclusions: In mild HF patients with LBBB and an implanted CRT-D, lateral/posterior, and anterior LV lead locations are similarly associated with reduction in the risk of HF or death events compared to ICD alone. Mortality benefit derived from CRT-D is associated only with patients with lateral/posterior LV lead location. An apical LV lead location should be avoided due to the early risk of death whenever possible. (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [MADIT-CRT], NCT00180271; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Post Approval Registry [MADIT-CRT-PAR], NCT01294449; and MADIT-CRT Long-Term International Follow-Up Registry - Europe, NCT02060110)., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality, heart failure events, and symptoms while improving exercise capacity and quality of life. Nevertheless, despite a large number of multicentre randomised trials and clear evidence confirming the above, there is still a higher number of patients who fail to develop reverse remodelling. In order to select the optimal patient population, the current European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend a simultaneous evaluation of QRS morphology and width. However, based on recent data, QRS width itself is a less accurate parameter in the prediction of the outcome, as compared to QRS morphology. Furthermore, the baseline left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF), which is also an known criterion for selecting CRT candidates (partly applied due to cost-benefit reasons), can be misleading. Data showed that patients with LVEF > 35% might also benefit from this type of treatment. Thus, LVEF should be evaluated less rigorously when screening patients for resynchronisation therapy. While the subsequent beneficial response to CRT is multifactorial, procedure-related parameters, such as LV lead position, are also crucial. The first data released recently confirmed the previous empiric clinical experience indicating that the LV lead should be implanted into the lateral or posterior coronary sinus side branch. This location was associated with a better long-term clinical outcome in terms of death and heart failure events. Some issues related to CRT are awaiting further clarification, such as the choice of the type of the implanted device (pacemaker or defibrillator) or the decision about CRT device upgrade. This review discusses the current evidence regarding the above, focusing on the questions that should be handled with caution or require clarification.

Patients with conventional pacemakers or implanted defibrillators are often considered for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Our aim was to summarize the available evidences regarding the clinical benefits of upgrade procedures. A systematic literature search was performed from studies published between 2006 and 2017 in order to compare the outcome of CRT upgrade vs. de novo implantations. Outcome data on all-cause mortality, heart failure events, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class, QRS narrowing and echocardiographic parameters were analysed. A total of 16 reports were analysed comprising 489,568 CRT recipients, of whom 468,205 patients underwent de novo and 21,363 upgrade procedures. All-cause mortality was similar after CRT upgrade compared to de novo implantations (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.88-1.60, p = 0.27). The risk of heart failure was also similar in both groups (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.70-1.32, p = 0.81). There was no significant difference in clinical response after CRT upgrade compared to de novo implantations in terms of improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (ΔEF de novo - 6.85% vs. upgrade - 9.35%; p = 0.235), NYHA class (ΔNYHA de novo - 0.74 vs. upgrade - 0.70; p = 0.737) and QRS narrowing (ΔQRS de novo - 9.6 ms vs. upgrade - 29.5 ms; p = 0.485). Our systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available studies reports that CRT upgrade is associated with similar risk for all-cause mortality compared to de novo resynchronization therapy. Benefits on reverse remodelling and functional capacity improved similarly in both groups suggesting that CRT upgrade may be safely and effectively offered in routine practice., Clinical Trial Registration: Prospero Database-CRD42016043747.

Aims: There are limited data on whether clinical presentation at first heart failure (HF) hospitalization predicts recurrent HF events. We aimed to assess predictors of recurrent HF hospitalizations in mild HF patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator., Methods and Results: Data on HF hospitalizations were prospectively collected for patients enrolled in MADIT-CRT. Predictors of recurrent HF hospitalization (HF2) after the first HF hospitalization were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models including baseline covariates and clinical presentation or management at first HF hospitalization. There were 193 patients with first HF hospitalization, and 156 patients with recurrent HF events. Recurrent HF rate after the first HF hospitalization was 43% at 1 year, 52% at 2 years, and 55% at 2.5 years. Clinical signs and symptoms, medical treatment, or clinical management of HF at first HF admission was not predictive for HF2. Baseline covariates predicting recurrent HF hospitalization included prior HF hospitalization (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.15-2.20, P = 0.005), digitalis therapy (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.13-2.20, P = 0.008), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume >240 mL (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.17-2.25, P = 0.004)., Conclusions: Recurrent HF events are frequent following the first HF hospitalization in patients with implanted implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator. Neither clinical presentation nor clinical management during first HF admission was predictive of recurrent HF. Prior HF hospitalization, digitalis therapy, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume at enrolment predicted recurrent HF hospitalization, and these covariates could be used as surrogate markers for identifying a high-risk cohort., (© 2017 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: There is lack of conclusive evidence from randomized clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with implanted pacemakers (PM) or defibrillators (ICD) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic heart failure (HF). The BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade Study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of CRT upgrade from conventional PM or ICD therapy in patients with intermittent or permanent right ventricular (RV) septal/apical pacing, reduced LVEF, and symptomatic HF., Methods and Results: The BUDAPEST-CRT study is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, investigator-sponsored clinical trial. A total of 360 subjects will be enrolled with LVEF ≤ 35%, NYHA functional classes II-IVa, paced QRS ≥ 150 ms, and a RV pacing ≥ 20%. Patients will be followed for 12 months. Randomization is performed in a 3:2 ratio (CRT-D vs. ICD). The primary composite endpoint is all-cause mortality, a first HF event, or less than 15% reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are all-cause mortality, all-cause mortality or HF event, and LV volume reduction at 12 months. Tertiary endpoints include changes in quality of life, NYHA functional class, 6 min walk test, natriuretic peptides, and safety outcomes., Conclusion: The results of our prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial will provide important information on the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) upgrade in patients with symptomatic HF, reduced LVEF, and wide-paced QRS with intermittent or permanent RV pacing., Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02270840., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Data on longer right to left ventricular activation delay (RV-LV AD) predicting clinical outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by left bundle branch block (LBBB) are limited. We aimed to evaluate the impact of RV-LV AD on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), ejection fraction (EF), and clinical outcome in patients implanted with CRT, stratified by LBBB at baseline., Methods and Results: Heart failure (HF) patients undergoing CRT implantation with EF ≤ 35% and QRS ≥ 120 ms were evaluated based on their RV-LV AD at implantation. Baseline and 6-month clinical parameters, EF, and NT-proBNP values were assessed. The primary endpoint was HF or death, the secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. A total of 125 patients with CRT were studied, 62% had LBBB. During the median follow-up of 2.2 years, 44 (35%) patients had HF/death, 36 (29%) patients died. Patients with RV-LV AD ≥ 86 ms (lower quartile) had significantly lower risk of HF/death [hazard ratio (HR): 0.44; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.23-0.82; P = 0.001] and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.23-1.00; P = 0.05), compared with those with RV-LV AD < 86 ms. Patients with RV-LV AD ≥ 86 ms and LBBB showed the greatest improvement in EF (28-36%; P<0.001), NT-proBNP (2771-1216 ng/mL; P < 0.001), and they had better HF-free survival (HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.11-0.49, P < 0.001) and overall survival (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.75; P = 0.007). There was no difference in outcome by RV-LV AD in non-LBBB patients., Conclusion: Left bundle branch block patients with longer RV-LV activation delay at CRT implantation had greater improvement in NT-proBNP, EF, and significantly better clinical outcome., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: There are limited and contradictory data on the effects of CRT with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) on mortality as compared with CRT with pacemaker (CRT-P)., Methods and Results: We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients implanted with a CRT-D or CRT-P device in our high-volume single-centre experience. Data on all-cause mortality were derived from clinic visits and the Hungarian National Healthcare Fund Death Registry. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate all-cause mortality in patients with CRT-D vs. CRT-P, stratified by the aetiology of cardiomyopathy. From 2000 to 2011, 1122 CRT devices, 693 CRT-P (LVEF 28.2 ± 7.4%) and 429 CRT-D (LVEF 27.6 ± 6.4%), were implanted at our centre. During the median follow-up of 28 months, 379 patients died from any cause, 250 patients (36%) with an implanted CRT-P and 129 patients (30%) with an implanted CRT-D. There was no evidence of mortality benefit in patients implanted with a CRT-D compared with a CRT-P in the total cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-1.32, P = 0.884]. In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, CRT-D treatment was associated with a significant 30% risk reduction in all-cause mortality compared with an implanted CRT-P (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.97, P = 0.03). In non-ischaemic patients, there was no mortality benefit of CRT-D over CRT-P (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73-1.32, P = 0.894, interaction P-value = 0.15)., Conclusions: In heart failure patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, CRT-D was associated with a mortality benefit compared with CRT-P, but no benefit of CRT-D over CRT-P in mortality was observed in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy., (© 2014 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: We aimed to assess the effect of cardiac resynchronization on left ventricular (LV) function, volumes, geometry, and mechanics in order to demonstrate reverse remodelling using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with resynchronization on.Methods and Results: New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-III patients on optimal medical therapy with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and complete LBBB with broad QRS (>150 ms) were prospectively recruited. Cardiac magnetic resonance examination was performed at baseline and at 6-month follow-up, applying both biventricular and AOO pacing. The following data were measured: conventional CMR parameters, remodelling indices, global longitudinal, circumferential, radial strain, global dyssynchrony [mechanical dispersion (MD) defined as the standard deviation of time to peak longitudinal/circumferential strain in 16 LV segments], and regional dyssynchrony (maximum differences in time between peak septal and lateral transversal displacement). Thirteen patients (64 ± 7 years, 38% male) were enrolled. Comparing the baseline and follow-up CMR parameters measured during biventricular pacing, significant increase in LVEF, and decrease in LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) and LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) were found. Left ventricular remodelling indices, global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain values showed significant improvement. Circumferential MD decreased (20.5 ± 5.5 vs. 13.4 ± 3.4, P < 0.001), while longitudinal MD did not change. Regional dyssynchrony drastically improved (362 ± 96 vs. 104 ± 66 ms, P < 0.001). Applying AOO pacing resulted in an immediate deterioration in LVEF, LVESVi, circumferential strain, global and regional dyssynchrony.Conclusion: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging during biventricular pacing is feasible and enables a more precise quantification of LV function, morphology, and mechanics. As a result, it may contribute to a better understanding of the effects of resynchronization therapy and might improve responder rate in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: While improvement in quality of life (QoL) has been widely reported in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients, its predictive value is not well-understood. We aimed to assess the predictive role of baseline QoL on long-term heart failure (HF) or death events in mild HF patients enrolled in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).Methods and Results: A total of 1791 of 1820 patients had their QoL evaluated at baseline, using the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires (KCCQ). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and multivariate Cox models were utilized. Issues within any of the domains of the baseline EQ-5D questionnaire (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) were associated with long-term mortality (median follow-up 5.6 years) (all P < 0.05). Heart failure or death events were predicted by issues in baseline mobility [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.41, P < 0.001], usual activities (HR = 1.41, P < 0.001), and anxiety/depression (HR = 1.21, P = 0.035). The risk of HF events alone was significantly higher in patients with baseline mobility issues (HR = 1.42, P < 0.001) or usual activity (HR = 1.35, P = 0.003). Every 10% increase in the visual analogue scale (0-100) was associated with an 8% lower risk of all-cause mortality (P = 0.006), and a 6% lower risk of HF/death (P = 0.002). Mobility issues also predicted echocardiographic reverse remodelling (-33.08 mL vs. -31.17 mL, P = 0.043). Using the KCCQ, patients in the lower tertile of the clinical summary or physical limitations score had a significantly higher risk of long-term HF or death (P < 0.05).Conclusion: In mild HF patients enrolled in MADIT-CRT, multiple baseline QoL questionnaire domains were predictors of echocardiographic remodelling, long-term all-cause mortality, and HF events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]