Search

Aims: Multisite atrial pacing has been suggested to be effective in suppressing atrial fibrillation (AF), however, the effect of linear triple-site atrial pacing (LTSP) in humans has not been evaluated. We compared the effects of LTSP to single-site atrial pacing (SSP) on the atrial activation and wavefront propagation pattern in patients with persistent AF., Methods and Results: In 10 patients with persistent AF, the effects of LTSP and SSP were evaluated by left atrial (LA) endocardial non-contact multielectrode array mapping and multipolar catheters. LTSP and SSP were delivered from the high right atrium (HRA), the distal coronary sinus (CS), and within the LA at the site showing maximal overlay of low-voltage zones during sinus rhythm and pacing at HRA and CS. Atrial activation time and pattern, P wave duration, and the prevention of AF induced by burst pacing were assessed with these pacing interventions. Compared with SSP, LTSP at the HRA, CS, and LA shortened atrial activation times (183 +/- 24 vs. 174 +/- 24 ms, 186 +/- 29 vs. 166 +/- 28 ms, and 171 +/- 40 vs. 163 +/- 39 ms; P < 0.05, respectively). P wave duration was shorter with LTSP than SSP at all three sites (141.7 +/- 35.1 vs. 146.9 +/- 38.5 ms, 138.1 +/- 34.6 vs. 145.7 +/- 33.7 ms, and 142.7 +/- 33.4 vs. 151.3 +/- 35.1 ms; P < 0.05, respectively). LTSP initially depolarized a larger area than SSP, and produced more uniform and planar wavefront propagation. LTSP prevented the burst-induction of AF during LA pacing in 3 of 10 patients, while SSP was never successful., Conclusion: In patients with persistent AF, LTSP provided more rapid and uniform activation of the atria compared with SSP, which was associated with prevention of burst-induction of AF in some patients. Further study is required to determine whether LTSP can modify the substrate of chronic AF, leading to frank AF suppression.

Background: Elderly pacemaker patients with chronotropic incompetence (CI) may experience orthostatic hypotension (OH) upon standing. The objective of this study was to determine whether a transient increase in heart rate (HR) by overdrive pacing upon standing prevents OH in elderly pacemaker patients., Methods: We studied the effect of transient overdrive pacing upon standing in mitigating the drop in blood pressure (BP) in 62 pacemaker patients (77 +/- 6 years, 32 F) implanted with DDD pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome (n = 40) or atrioventricular block (n = 22). All patients underwent two standing procedures in random order: a control, with backup (60 bpm) pacing and another with overdrive DDD pacing (at 35 bpm above their baseline rate) for 2 minutes upon standing. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and HR were measured while supine (baseline) and 1, 2, and 3 minutes after standing. OH was defined as a drop in SBP > or = 20 mmHg or DBP > or = 10 mmHg during standing. Chronotropic incompetence (CI) was defined as an absence of HR increase of > or = 10 bpm during standing., Results: A total of 17 (27%) patients developed OH upon standing during backup pacing. Baseline clinical characteristics (age, sex, prevalence of diabetes, use of vasoactive medications, and sick sinus syndrome) were similar between patients with or without OH. In patients with or without OH, transient overdrive pacing upon standing increased HR and DBP as compared with baseline (P < 0.05). However, in patients with OH, transient overdrive pacing did not prevent decrease in SBP upon standing and avoided the development of OH in only 10/17 patients (59%). Among those patients with OH, 10/17 (59%) patients had CI. In OH patients with CI, transient overdrive pacing upon standing maintained SBP and DBP as compared to baseline and prevented OH in the majority of patients (80%). By contrast, transient overdrive pacing in OH patients without CI had no significant effect on the decrease in SBP upon standing and prevented OH in only 20% of patients., Conclusions: OH is common (27%) in the elderly pacemaker population. In a subgroup of these patients, CI may be responsible for the occurrence of OH, and OH can be prevented by transient overdrive pacing upon standing.

Determination of the optimal interventricular (VV) delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy currently relies on costly, time-consuming echocardiographic (ECHO) methods. This study evaluated the performance of a new intracardiac electrogram (IEGM)-based VV method compared to the aortic velocity time integral (AVTI) method of VV delay optimization. The study included two patient groups. Eleven patients enrolled by a single center in the Rhythm II ICD trial underwent prospective comparisons of the AVTI at the VV interval determined by the IEGM VV method versus the maximum AVTI at the echocardiographically determined optimal VV delay. In 61 patients enrolled in the RHYTHM VV trial, the same testing methods were compared retrospectively. In the prospective study, the maximum AVTI by the ECHO-based method (24.3 +/- 7.9 cm), was closely correlated with maximum AVTI by the IEGM-based method (23.9 +/- 7.9 cm; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.99; 95% confidence, lower limit of 98%. Likewise, in the retrospective analysis, the ECHO-determined maximum AVTI (22.1 +/- 8.2 cm) was similar to that determined by the IEGM-based method (20.9 +/- 8.3 cm; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.98; 95% confidence, lower limit of 97%).

Beat-by-beat Autocapture is currently limited to operation in the ventricle with bipolar leads. The authors investigated the integral of the negative-going portion of the atrial evoked response integral (AERI) as a potential resource for verification of atrial capture. Intracardiac electrogram signals were collected from 59 patients (ages 67.8 +/- 15.1 years) with bipolar, low polarization atrial leads. The signals were collected over a mean period of 6.1 months (minimum 4 days) after lead implantation. St. Jude Medical Affinity pulse generators were used to perform automatic capture threshold tests while the electrogram signals were recorded by a Model 3510 programming device. These signals were transferred to a personal computer in digital form for later analysis. The AERI was calculated at each programmable pacing voltage until capture was lost. The difference between the polarization integral at loss of capture and evoked response integral with successful capture was sufficient to justify enabling the atrial Autocapture feature in 53 of 59 patients in whom bipolar pacing and unipolar sensing was performed. The authors developed a calibration routine to identify automatically those patients in whom atrial Autocapture could be programmed On, based on the polarization integral at loss of capture, the estimated maximum polarization integral, and the AERI. Preliminary analysis indicated that the AERI is a practical resource for beat-by-beat atrial capture detection when used with low polarization leads.

Left ventricular (LV) pacing is increasingly used in the management of congestive heart failure. Optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) interval is essential to maximize the hemodynamic benefits of this therapy. Although Doppler echocardiography (echo) is the most widely used method, it is time-consuming, expensive, and operator-dependent. We examined the value of an impedance cardiography (IC)-based method of cardiac output (CO) measurement to optimize the AV interval in 5 men and 1 woman (mean age = 72 +/- 11 years) during permanent LV pacing with a 4.8 Fr unipolar coronary sinus pacing lead. Simultaneous measurements of CO by IC and echo were performed at AV intervals of 50, 80, 110, 150, 180, and 225 ms during DDD pacing at 85 beats/min. The optimal AV interval varied between 110 and 180 ms. In 5 of 6 patients (83%), the optimal AV interval by echo and IC was identical. While CO measurements were higher with IC than with echo (6.1 +/- 0.4 L/min vs 4.7 +/- 0.3 L/min, P < 0.05), CO measurements by IC and echo were closely correlated r = 0.67, P < 0.001). In conclusion, our initial experience suggests that IC is a reliable method of AV interval optimization during LV pacing. IC and echo measurements of CO during LV pacing were closely correlated.

Beat-by-beat Autocapture maximizes device longevity by minimizing stimulus amplitude while assuring patient safety. Currently, Autocapture permits use of only bipolar leads. The authors have devised a detection method that operates with unipolar and bipolar leads and covers all pacing and sensing combinations (but bipolar pace and sense simultaneously). This new detection method for unipolar sensing uses the integral of the negative portion of the unipolar evoked response as a robust capture detection feature. When using bipolar leads, the method provides the flexibility of bipolar or unipolar pacing. In this study, unipolar ventricular intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) were recorded in 71 patients, 73.7 +/- 9.9 years of age; 9 with high polarization, 62 with low polarization. High polarization had polished platinum or activated carbon electrodes. Low polarization had TiN, platinized platinum, or IrOx electrodes. The intracardiac EGMs were recorded 544 +/- 796 days after implant. The pacemakers performed an automatic capture threshold test while the intracardiac EGM signals were recorded in a programmer. These digitized signals were saved for off-line analysis. The unipolar evoked response was calculated at up to six (depending on capture threshold) pacing voltages and the polarization integral at 4.5 V and at loss of capture. An automatic calibration algorithm determined if the signal-to-noise ratio was adequate for Autocapture operation. Autocapture was possible with 60 of 62 of the low polarizations, and with 6 of 9 of the high polarizations. The average values form the data collected were: average unipolar evoked response--4.1 +/- 2.1 mV, average peak negative voltage--10.0 +/- 3.7 mV, average polarization 0.3 +/- 0.34 mV, and average signal-to-noise ratio (unipolar evoked response/ polarization) 38 +/- 71. In all cases the algorithm correctly determined the appropriateness of using Autocapture with the electrodes tested and the unipolar evoked response threshold to be used.