Search

Background: Physiologic pacing has been demonstrated to be effective in preventing atrial fibrillation recurrences in patients with sinus bradycardia. Aim of the study was to evaluate long-term incidence of atrial fibrillation in a large population of patients affected by sinus node disease receiving physiologic pacing. Furthermore, predictors of arrhythmia recurrence and effect of pacing mode were investigated., Population: Four hundred twenty-five patients (220 Male, 77 +/- 9 years) were retrospectively analyzed: implanted system was AAI in 20.5% and DDD in 79.5%. Thirty-four percent had atrial fibrillation before implant., Results: Follow-up lasted on average 51 +/- 36 months (median 42, range 1 month-18 years). Sixty-six percent were on antiarrhythmic drug therapy. After 5 years, 89% survived, 74.5% had at least one episode of atrial fibrillation, 39.9% were submitted to electrical cardioversion, 67.2% were hospitalized because of cardiac causes, 33.3% developed permanent atrial fibrillation. Primary conduction system disease and valvular heart disease were independent predictors for atrial fibrillation recurrence. Preimplant atrial fibrillation predicted arrhythmia recurrence during the follow-up, but it did not predict development of permanent atrial fibrillation. AAI pacing, when compared with DDD, was associated to a lower rate of atrial fibrillation recurrences (AAI 28.7%, DDD 53.3%, P < 0.001)., Conclusion: In spite of expected benefits of physiologic pacing, the development of atrial fibrillation and permanent atrial fibrillation were quite common. The additional benefits of multifunction pacemakers designed to prevent and treat atrial fibrillation should be evaluated in controlled studies.

Several studies on the acute effect of cardiac resynchronization in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) have shown that left and biventricular stimulation increase pulse pressure and contractility, while patients with a QRS complex <150 ms may deteriorate during stimulation. Patients with LBBB, severe HF and a QRS width >150 ms underwent right, left and biventricular stimulation at different AV delays. Acute response was defined as > or =10% pulse pressure increase. 165 of 188 patients (88%) in sinus rhythm (47 women, mean age 62.5+/-10 years, ejection fraction 23+/-8%, NYHA class 3.1+/-0.3) were regarded acute responders. 10% of 103 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and 16.5% of 79 patients with coronary artery disease were considered non-responders. 29 patients (81%) with 2 posterolateral veins were acute responders with 10 of them (33%) being responders in only one vein. 54 patients had a higher pulse pressure increase (10.7+/-10.6%) with atrio-left ventricular stimulation, 48 patients with atrio-biventricular stimulation (9.8+/-6.4%). At one-year follow-up, heart failure had significantly (p<0.0001) improved from NYHA class 3.1+/-0.4 to 2.1+/-0.7, VO(2)peak from 12.7+/-2.8 to 15.9+/-3.6 ml/min/kg. Left ventricular enddiastolic diameter being an indicator of reverse remodeling decreased from 80.5+/-10.5 to 73.3+/-13 (p<0.0001). Hemodynamic testing before CRT allows for the identification of acute non-responders as well as the best mode and site of stimulation and the optimal atrioventricular delay in responders.

The extension of the RAM memories in the latest generation of pacemakers has enabled development of Holter function allowing continuous surveillance of the cardiac rhythm. Between October 1991 and February 1995, 213 patients implanted with a Chorus 6234 or 7034 (Ela Medical) pacemaker, functioning in the DDD (R) mode, were followed up using the implanted continuous Holter function. Of the patients with no documented supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA) before implantation (n = 154), 67 (43.5%) developed SVA during an average period of one year. Male patients (p = 0.01; OR = 7.5 on multivariate analysis), high degrees of AVB (p = 0.03) and the presence of isolated or bursts of atrial extrasystoles (p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for SVA. The average time to detection of SVA was 207 days. In patients with documented SVA before implantation (n = 59), 22 (37.3%) had no recurrence during follow-up; in the other 37 cases, the average period before recurrence was 127 days. Multivariate analysis did not reveal any independent risk factor for recurrence of the arrhythmias. On the other hand, persistent but delayed atrioventricular conduction (1 degree AVB, long H-V interval or bifascicular block), seemed to protect against SVA, independently of other variables and of antiarrhythmic therapy (p = 0.008). These results suggest a high prevalence of SVA in patients on long-term pacemaker therapy, most episodes being asymptomatic. The implanted Holter function would therefore seem to be an essential tool for investigating and following up the natural history of arrhythmias in these patients.

Although rate adaptive pacemakers are now frequently prescribed, there is limited information regarding long-term follow-up of patients with a pacemaker capable of rate adaptation. We have examined our patients in whom a pacemaker capable of rate adaptation via a sensor that determines minute ventilation has been implanted. After following a group of 42 patients for a mean of 13.2 months we have found this to be a reliable rate adaptive pacing system. The sensor was reliable long term, the system is easy to program, and sensor settings were changed infrequently.

Several varieties of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) with pacing capabilities are now available. Although specific recommendations for prophylactic perioperative placement of pacemakers have been offered previously, the authors believe that those recommendations warrant further examination, taking into consideration the availability of new pacing modalities. Toward this end, the use of pacing PACs in cardiac surgical patients was prospectively examined. In 600 consecutive adult patients with PACs placed prior to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), the cardiac anesthesiologist recorded if a pacing PAC was placed, the indications for placing it, and whether the catheter was used to pace. If a pacing PAC was not chosen, the anesthesiologist indicated whether cardiac pacing was needed prior to CPB. In all patients, the presence and specifics of the following five possible indications were documented: sinus node dysfunction/bradydysrhythmias, atrioventricular heart block, fascicular or bundle branch block, cardiac reoperation, and/or valvular heart disease. PACs with pacing capability were placed in 180 of the 600 patients (30.0%) and were used in 34 of these 180 patients (18.8%). In 4 of 420 patients (0.95%) without pacing PACs, cardiac pacing was needed prior to CPB. The following preoperative diagnoses were significant predictors (P less than .05) for the use or need for pacing catheters: sinus node dysfunction/bradydysrhythmias, a history of transient complete atrioventricular block, aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency, and reoperation. The majority of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery do not require the use of a pacing PAC prior to CPB.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)