Search

Although kidney transplantation (KT) has been shown to ameliorate adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling associated with end stage kidney disease, its effects on the right ventricle have not been well studied. Recently, strain imaging has been shown to be a sensitive measure of early subclinical myocardial dysfunction. Using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined the effects of KT on right ventricular (RV) strain parameters. In a cohort of 81 patients (39 patients underwent KT and 42 patients remained on dialysis as control group), cardiac MRI studies were obtained at baseline and at 1 year follow‐up. There were no significant differences in RV strain values between the groups at baseline. After 1 year, RV strain values did not significantly change in patients who received KT, and changes in RV strain over 1 year were not significantly different between the KT and the dialysis groups. Given the previously demonstrated improvement in LV strain post‐KT, the current study suggests that RV and LV remodelling post‐KT may have different mechanisms. Further studies elucidating the effects of KT on RV remodelling are needed. SUMMARY AT A GLANCE: In this prospective cohort study, the authors compared changes over time in right ventricular (RV) strain using cardiac MRI in dialysis patients who did and did not receive a kidney transplant. They found that RV strain measures did not change over time, suggesting that cardiac remodelling after transplant likely occurs via other mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Current guidelines provide left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) criterion for use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) but do not specify which modality to use for measurement. We compared LVEF measurements by radionuclide ventriculography (RNV) vs cardiac MRI (CMR) in ICD candidates to assess impact on clinical decision making. Methods This single-centre study included 124 consecutive patients referred for assessment of ICD implantation who underwent RNV and CMR within 30 days for LVEF measurement. RNV and CMR were interpreted independently by experienced readers. Results Among 124 patients (age 64 ± 11 years, 77% male), median interval between CMR and RNV was 1 day; mean LVEF was 32 ± 12% by CMR and 33 ± 11% by RNV ( p  = 0.60). LVEF by CMR and RNV showed good correlation, but Bland-Altman analysis showed relatively wide limits of agreement (−12.1 to 11.4). CMR LVEF reclassified 26 (21%) patients compared to RNV LVEF (kappa = 0.58). LVEF by both modalities showed good interobserver reproducibility (ICC 0.96 and 0.94, respectively) (limits of agreement −7.27 to 5.75 and −8.63 to 6.34, respectively). Conclusion Although LVEF measurements by CMR and RNV show moderate agreement, there is frequent reclassification of patients for ICD placement based on LVEF between these modalities. Future studies should determine if a particular imaging modality for LVEF measurement may enhance ICD decision making and treatment benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiac amyloidosis is increasingly recognized as a significant contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. With the emergence of novel therapies, there is a growing interest in prognostication of patients with cardiac amyloidosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to examine the prognostic significance of myocardial native T1 and T2, and extracellular volume (ECV). Observational cohort studies or single arms of clinical trials were eligible. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were systematically searched from their respective dates of inception to January 2023. No exclusions were made based on date of publication, study outcomes, or study language. The study populations composed of adult patients (≥18 years old) with amyloid cardiomyopathy. All studies included the use of CMR with and without intravenous gadolinium contrast administration to assess myocardial native T1 mapping, T2 mapping, and ECV in association with the pre-specified primary outcome of all-cause mortality. Data were extracted from eligible primary studies by two independent reviewers and pooled via the inverse variance method using random effects models for meta-analysis. A total of 3852 citations were reviewed. A final nine studies including a total of 955 patients (mean age 65 ± 10 years old, 32% female, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 59 ± 12% and 24% had NYHA class III or IV symptoms) with cardiac amyloidosis [light chain amyloidosis (AL) 50%, transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) 49%, other 1%] were eligible for inclusion and suitable for data extraction. All included studies were single centered (seven with 1.5 T MRI scanners, two with 3.0 T MRI scanners) and non-randomized in design, with follow-up spanning from 8 to 64 months (median follow-up = 25 months); 320 patients died during follow-up, rendering a weighted mortality rate of 33% across studies. Compared with patients with AL amyloid, patients with ATTR amyloid had significantly higher mean left ventricular mass index (LVMi) (102 ± 34 g/m2 vs 127 ± 37 g/m2, p = 0.02). N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), troponin T levels, mean native T1 values, ECV and T2 values did not differ between patients with ATTR amyloid and AL amyloid (all p > 0.25). Overall, the hazard ratios for mortality were 1.33 (95% CI = [1.10, 1.60]; p = 0.003; I 2 = 29%) for every 60 ms higher T1 time, 1.16 (95% CI = [1.09, 1.23], p < 0.0001; I 2 = 76%) for every 3% higher ECV, and 5.23 (95% CI = [2.27, 12.02]; p < 0.0001; I 2 = 0%) for myocardial-to-skeletal T2 ratio below the mean (vs above the mean). Higher native T1 time and ECV, and lower myocardial to skeletal T2 ratio, on CMR are associated with worse mortality in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Therefore, tissue mapping using CMR may offer a useful non-invasive technique to monitor disease progression and determine prognosis in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. • In this meta-analysis of nine studies of cardiac MRI (CMR) in cardiac amyloidosis, patients with cardiac amyloidosis have high mortality rate. • Every 3% increase in myocardial extracellular volume on CMR corresponds to 16% relative increase in mortality risk. • Every 60 ms increase in myocardial T1 time on CMR corresponds to 33% relative increase in mortality risk. • Lower myocardial to skeletal T2 ratio is associated with a higher mortality rate. • Therefore, CMR is a useful tool for prognostication in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]