Search

Objectives: To investigate if the effect of cardiac computed tomography (CT) vs. invasive coronary angiography (ICA) on cardiovascular events differs based on smoking status. Materials and methods: This pre-specified subgroup analysis of the pragmatic, prospective, multicentre, randomised DISCHARGE trial (NCT02400229) involved 3561 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or stroke). Secondary endpoints included an expanded MACE composite (MACE, transient ischaemic attack, or major procedure-related complications). Results: Of 3445 randomised patients with smoking data (mean age 59.1 years + / − 9.7, 1151 men), at 3.5-year follow-up, the effect of CT vs. ICA on MACE was consistent across smoking groups (p for interaction = 0.98). The percutaneous coronary intervention rate was significantly lower with a CT-first strategy in smokers and former smokers (p = 0.01 for both). A CT-first strategy reduced the hazard of major procedure-related complications (HR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.81; p = 0.045) across smoking groups. In current smokers, the expanded MACE composite was lower in the CT- compared to the ICA-first strategy (2.3% (8) vs 6.0% (18), HR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.17, 0.88). The rate of non-obstructive CAD was significantly higher in all three smoking groups in the CT-first strategy. Conclusion: For patients with stable chest pain referred for ICA, the clinical outcomes of CT were consistent across smoking status. The CT-first approach led to a higher detection rate of non-obstructive CAD and fewer major procedure-related complications in smokers. Clinical relevance statement: This pre-specified sub-analysis of the DISCHARGE trial confirms that a CT-first strategy in patients with stable chest pain referred for invasive coronary angiography with an intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease is as effective as and safer than invasive coronary angiography, irrespective of smoking status. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02400229. Key Points: • No randomised studies have assessed smoking status on CT effectiveness in symptomatic patients referred for invasive coronary angiography. • A CT-first strategy results in comparable adverse events, fewer complications, and increased coronary artery disease detection, irrespective of smoking status. • A CT-first strategy is safe and effective for stable chest pain patients with intermediate pre-test probability for CAD, including never smokers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is commonly assessed with Agatston score (AS). A higher sensitivity and precision for the detection of CAC has been demonstrated with calibrated mass score (cMS). We hypothesized that cMS would detect low-level CAC not detectable with AS in a large asymptomatic background population.Methods: Participants (N = 2985) from the Copenhagen General Population Study were evaluated for CAC using both conventional AS and cMS. The population was grouped according to number of traditional risk factors and heart score was used to assess the risk of event for those with no CAC, those with only cMS > 0 and those with both AS and cMS > 0.Results: In participants with an AS = 0, 11% had cMS > 0. The risk profile of this cMS-only group was between that of the CAC-negative participants and those with AS > 0 and cMS > 0. Overall, 6% of the population belonged to the cMS-only group independent of the number of risk factors.Conclusion: In individuals with AS = 0, a fraction was found to have cMS > 0. Based on traditional risk factors, this group has a higher 10-year risk than individuals with both AS = 0 and cMS = 0; cMS might offer very early cardiovascular risk assessment in asymptomatic individuals.Key Points: • In individuals with AS=0, a fraction has CAC with highly sensitive cMS. • This fraction has a higher 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease. • Regardless of risk factors, 6% has CAC detectable only with cMS. • cMS might offer very early cardiovascular risk assessment in asymptomatic individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]