Search

Background: Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) provides accurate evaluation of mitral valve (MV) function following mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) and may better detect complications in case of suboptimal result., Aims: We aimed to evaluate midterm anatomical changes and structural complications after M-TEER using TOE and investigate their association with clinical outcomes at 2 years., Methods: A follow-up TOE at 6 months was systematically recommended to all patients included in our institutional prospective M-TEER registry until December 2021. We assessed changes in the incidence of mitral regurgitation (MR), MV stenosis (≥5 mmHg), and partial or complete single leaflet device attachment (SLDA) between the index procedure and follow-up and evaluated MV area and annular dimensions in a subset of patients with available three-dimensional (3D) datasets. The clinical endpoint was a composite of mortality and heart failure (HF) rehospitalisation at 2 years., Results: Among the 373 patients included in the registry between February 2012 and December 2021, 128 patients (34%) underwent elective TOE at 6 months. Using TOE, severe MR was observed in 13.3% (n=17) of the patients. The number of patients with an elevated MV gradient increased from 17 (13.3%) after the procedure to 23 (18%) at 6 months, and a new partial or complete SLDA was detected in 7.8% (n=10). Based on 3D TOE measurements, significant increases in MV area, annular area, annular perimeter, and intercommissural (but not anteroposterior) diameter were observed compared to intraprocedural images. A mean MV gradient ≥5 mmHg (hazard ratio [HR] 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-4.81; p=0.023) and the presence of severe MR at 6 months (HR 3.26, 95% CI: 1.18-8.99; p=0.023) were associated with the primary endpoint, which was met in 34 (26.6%) patients at 2 years., Conclusions: TOE follow-up allowed the detection of complications that would not be diagnosed using transthoracic echocardiography only and should therefore be used liberally in the patients presenting with a suboptimal result. A mean MV gradient ≥5 mmHg and severe MR, diagnosed at the 6-month TOE follow-up, were associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

Background: New postprocessing software facilitates 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic determination of mitral annular (MA) and neo-left ventricular outflow tract (neo-LVOT) dimensions in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR)., Objectives: This study aims to test the accuracy of 3D echocardiographic analysis as compared to baseline computed tomography (CT)., Methods: A total of 105 consecutive patients who underwent TMVR at 2 tertiary care centers between October 2017 and May 2023 were retrospectively included. A virtual valve was projected in both baseline CT and 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) using dedicated software. MA dimensions were measured in baseline images and neo-LVOT dimensions were measured in baseline and postprocedural images. All measurements were compared to baseline CT as a reference. The predicted neo-LVOT area was correlated with postprocedural peak LVOT gradients., Results: There was no significant bias in baseline neo-LVOT prediction between both imaging modalities. TEE significantly underestimated MA area, perimeter, and medial-lateral dimension compared to CT. Both modalities significantly underestimated the actual neo-LVOT area (mean bias pre/post TEE: 25.6 mm 2 , limit of agreement: -92.2 mm 2 to 143.3 mm 2 ; P < 0.001; mean bias pre/post CT: 28.3 mm 2 , limit of agreement: -65.8 mm 2 to 122.4 mm 2 ; P = 0.046), driven by neo-LVOT underestimation in the group treated with dedicated mitral valve bioprosthesis. Both CT- and TEE-predicted-neo-LVOT areas exhibited an inverse correlation with postprocedural LVOT gradients (r 2  = 0.481; P < 0.001 for TEE and r 2  = 0.401; P < 0.001 for CT)., Conclusions: TEE-derived analysis provides comparable results with CT-derived metrics in predicting the neo-LVOT area and peak gradient after TMVR., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Bartkowiak has received grants from Novartis Foundation. Dr Windecker has received grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse Inc, Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson and Johnson, Medalliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp and Dohm, Miracor Medical, MonarQ, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; has served as advisory board member and/or member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave with payments to the institution but no personal payments; and has been a member of a steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr George has received consulting fees from Zimmer Biomet, Atricure, Neosurgery, Neptune Medical, Abbvie, Johnson and Johnson, Durvena, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Help-TheraX, 3ive, Encompass, Summus Medical, Abbott SJM, BCI, and Xeltis; has been on advisory boards for Edwards Surgical, Medtronic Surgical, Medtronic Structural Mitral and Tricuspid, Trisol Medical, Valcare Medical, Durvena, Abbvie, Johnson and Johnson, Foldax Medical, Zimmer Biomet, Neosurgery, Abbvie, Boston Scientific, Summus Medical, BCI Equity: Valcare Medical, Durvena, CardioMech, Vdyne, MitreMedical, MITRx, and BCI; and has received institutional funding to Columbia University from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and JenaValve. Dr Kodali has received institutional grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Abbott; has received consulting fees from Abbott, Admedus, and Meril Lifesciences; and has equity options from Biotrace Medical and Thubrikar Aortic Valve Inc. Dr Praz has been compensated for travel expenses from Edwards Lifescicences, Abbott Vascular, Medira, Polares Medical, and Siemens Healthineers. Dr Hahn has received speaker fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Philips Healthcare; has institutional consulting contracts for which she receives no direct compensation with Abbott Structural, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Novartis; and the is Chief Scientific Officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored tricuspid valve trials for which she receives no direct industry compensation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To identify anatomical computed tomography (CT) predictors of procedural and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER)., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients undergoing T-TEER between March 2018 to December 2022 who had cardiac CT prior to the procedure were included. CT scans were automatically analyzed using a dedicated software that employs deep learning techniques to provide precise anatomical measurements and volumetric calculations. Technical success was defined as successful placement of at least one implant in the planned anatomic location without single leaflet device attachment. Procedural success was defined as tricuspid regurgitation reduction to moderate or less. Procedural complexity was assessed by measuring the fluoroscopy time. The clinical endpoint was a composite of death, heart failure hospitalization, or tricuspid re-intervention throughout two years. A total of 33 patients (63.6% male) were included. Procedural success was achieved in 22 patients (66.7%). Shorter end-systolic (ES) height between the inferior vena cava (IVC) and tricuspid annulus (TA) (r ​= ​- 0.398, p ​= ​0.044) and longer ES RV length (r ​= ​0.551, p ​= ​0.006) correlated with higher procedural complexity. ES RV length was independently associated with lower technical(adjusted Odds ratio [OR] 0.812 [95% CI 0.665-0.991], p ​= ​0.040) and procedural success (adjusted OR 0.766, CI [0.591-0.992], p ​= ​0.043). Patients with ES right ventricular (RV) length of >77.4 ​mm had a four-fold increased risk of experiencing the composite clinical endpoint compared to patients with ES RV length ≤77.4 ​mm (HR ​= ​3.964 [95% CI, 1.018-15.434]; p ​= ​0,034])., Conclusion: CT-derived RV length and IVC-to-TA height may be helpful to identify patients at increased risk for procedural complexity and adverse outcomes when undergoing T-TEER. CT provides valuable information for preprocedural decision-making and device selection., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Dr. Bartkowiak reports research grant from Novartis Foundation. Dr. Windecker reports research, travel or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse Inc. Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medalliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohm, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech. Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, V-Wave. Dr. Windecker served as advisory board member and/or member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave with payments to the institution but no personal payments. He is also member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr. Hahn reports speaker fees from Abbott Structural, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic and Philips Healthcare; she has institutional consulting contracts for which she receives no direct compensation with Abbott Structural, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic and Novartis; she is Chief Scientific Officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored tricuspid valve trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr. Praz has been compensated for travel expenses from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Polares Medical, Medira, and Siemens Healthineers., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)