Search

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to drowning carries high morbidity and mortality. There are a few studies on drowning-related out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), in which patients are followed from the scene to hospital discharge. This study aims to compare patient characteristics between the survival group and mortality group of OHCA due to drowning. OHCA due to drowning cases were selected from the North America Termination of Resuscitation Association database between 2011 and 2015. The retrospective analysis of epidemiological characteristics and clinical features of all OHCA patients were performed. Of the 17,094 OHCA cases in the registry, 54 cases of OHCA due to drowning were included in this study. Among the 54 OHCAs due to drowning, 7 (13.0%) survived, while 47 (87.0%) died. Compared to the mortality group, the survival group had a higher bystander witness rate (57.1% versus 17.0%, p < 0.05), higher asystole rate (42.9% versus 78.7%, p < 0.05), and higher mild therapeutic hypothermia rate (28.6% versus 2.1%, p < 0.05). In addition, a large proportion of survivors were children (71.4%) and males (71.4%). Survival among OHCA's due to drowning was found to be improved with a higher bystander rate, higher asystole rate, and higher mild hypothermia rate. In addition, children and males comprised the majority of survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The conversion from a nonshockable rhythm (asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA)) to a shockable rhythm (pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) may be associated with better out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes. There are insufficient data on the prognostic significance of such conversions by initial heart rhythm and different rhythm conversion time. Methods. Among 24,849 adult OHCA patients of presumed cardiac etiology with initial asystole or PEA in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Cardiac Epidemiologic Registry (version 3, 2011–2015), we examined the association of shockable rhythm conversion with prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival, and favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤3) at hospital discharge by initial rhythm and rhythm conversion time (time from cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiation by emergency medical providers to first shock delivery), using logistic regression adjusting for key clinical characteristics. Results. Of 16,516 patients with initial asystole and 8,333 patients with initial PEA, 16% and 20% underwent shockable rhythm conversions; the median rhythm conversion time was 12.0 (IQR: 6.7–18.7) and 13.2 (IQR: 7.0–20.5) min, respectively. No difference was found in odds of prehospital ROSC across rhythm conversion time, regardless of initial heart rhythm. Shockable rhythm conversion was associated with survival and favorable functional outcome at hospital discharge only when occurred during the first 15 min of CPR, for those with initial asystole, or the first 10 min of CPR, for those with initial PEA. The associations between shockable rhythm conversion and outcomes were stronger among those with initial asystole compared with those with initial PEA. Conclusions. The conversion from a nonshockable rhythm to a shockable rhythm was associated with better outcomes only when occurred early in initial nonshockable rhythm OHCA, and it has greater prognostic significance when the initial rhythm was asystole. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Signing Do-Not-Resuscitate orders is an important element contributing to a worse prognosis for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, our data showed that some of those OHCA patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate orders signed in hospital survived to hospital discharge, and even recovered with favorable neurological function. In this study, we described their clinical features and identified those factors that were associated with better outcomes.Methods: A retrospective, observational analysis was performed on all adult non-traumatic OHCA who were enrolled in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) PRIMED study but signed Do-Not-Resuscitate orders in hospital after admission. We reported their demographics, characteristics, interventions and outcomes of all enrolled cases. Patients surviving and not surviving to hospital discharge, as well as those who did and did not obtain favorable neurological recovery, were compared. Logistic regression models assessed those factors which might be prognostic to survival and favorable neurological outcomes at discharge.Results: Of 2289 admitted patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate order signed in hospital, 132(5.8%) survived to hospital discharge and 28(1.2%) achieved favorable neurological recovery. Those factors, including witnessed arrest, prehospital shock delivered, Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) obtained in the field, cardiovascular interventions or procedures applied, and no prehospital adrenaline administered, were independently associated with better outcomes.Conclusions: We suggest that some factors should be taken into considerations before Do-Not-Resuscitate decisions are made in hospital for those admitted OHCA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There remains controversy over the prognostic significance of spontaneous shockable rhythm conversion in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with initial non-shockable heart rhythms (pulseless electrical activity [PEA] or asystole). The aim of this study was to examine the association of shockable rhythm conversion with multiple OHCA outcomes, and to explore effect modifiers.Methods: A dual-reviewer search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE databases in March 2017. Data on study design, patient characteristics, outcomes, adjusting and stratifying variables were extracted. Estimates were combined using random-effects models.Results: Twelve studies involving 1,108,281 OHCA patients with initial non-shockable heart rhythms were identified using pre-specified eligibility criteria. Combined adjusted estimates showed that shockable rhythm conversion was associated with higher odds of pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (odds ratio [OR]=1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-1.55). Although shockable rhythm conversion was not associated with survival to hospital discharge (OR=1.36, 95% CI 0.77-2.38), it was associated with higher odds of one-month survival (OR=1.96, 95% CI 1.66-2.31), and one-month favourable neurological outcome (OR=2.69, 95% CI 2.00-3.62). Subgroup analyses found that shockable rhythm conversion from asystole, but not PEA, was associated with pre-hospital ROSC and survival to hospital discharge, and that earlier shockable rhythm conversions, compared to those occurring later during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, were associated with higher odds of one-month favourable neurological outcome.Conclusion: Shockable rhythm conversion from initial non-shockable heart rhythms was associated with better OHCA outcomes, depending on the type of initial heart rhythm, and time of rhythm conversion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

the Aim Of the Study: To identify the prognostic factors and effects of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with ICDs because the clinical characteristics and outcomes of OHCA patients with ICDs are unknown.Methods: The North American Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Cardiac Epistry Version 3 dataset was analyzed. Eligible patients were divided into OHCA patients with and without ICDs. Multivariable regressions were employed to analyze.Results: Of 51,634 eligible OHCA patients, 581 (1.13%) had implanted ICDs. Among them, 53 (9.1%) patients survived to hospital discharge, and 40 (6.9%) patients had favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Multivariable regression showed ICDs were not associated with OHCA outcomes in the total OHCA patients. In the OHCA patients with ICDs, shockable initial emergency medical services (EMS)-recorded rhythms and the ICD-shock-only defibrillation pattern were independent favorable factors for survival to hospital discharge(OR = 3.3, 95%CI 1.7-6.2, P < 0.001; OR = 2.4, 95%CI 1.1-5.5, P = 0.035, respectively) and neurological outcome at hospital discharge (OR = 6.5, 95%CI 2.9-14.4, P < 0.001; OR = 3.6, 95%CI 1.4-9.1, P = 0.006, respectively). During field resuscitation in OHCA patients with ICDs, at least 34.9% of total patients and 64.6% of patients with initial EMS-recorded VT/VF rhythms needed additional external shocks.Conclusions: Shockable initial EMS-recorded rhythms and ICD-shock-only defibrillation pattern were independent factors for the favorable outcomes of OHCA patients with ICDs. ICDs were not associated with the outcomes of OHCA, and additional external shocks were needed in a substantial number of OHCA patients with ICDs during field resuscitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Adrenaline is an important component in the resuscitation of individuals experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The 2018 Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) algorithm gives the option of either intravenous (IV) or intraosseous (IO) routes for adrenaline administration during cardiac arrest. However, the optimal route during prehospital resuscitation remains controversial. This study aims to investigate whether IV and IO routes lead to different outcomes in OHCA patients who received prehospital adrenaline.Methods: This retrospective analysis included adult patients with OHCA of presumed cardiac origin who had Emergency Medical Services (EMS) CPR, received adrenaline, and were enrolled in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Cardiac Epistry version 3 database between 2011 and 2015. We divided the study population into IV and IO groups based on the administration route. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between adrenaline delivery routes and prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge, and favorable neurological outcome.Results: Of the 35,733 patients included, 27,758 (77.7%) had adrenaline administered via IV access and 7975 (22.3%) via IO access. With the IO group as a reference in the logistic regression model, the adjusted odds ratios of the IV group for prehospital ROSC, survival and favorable neurological outcome were 1.367 (95%CI, 1.276-1.464), 1.468 (95%CI, 1.264-1.705) and 1.849 (95%CI, 1.526-2.240), respectively. Similar results were found in the propensity score matched population and subgroup analysis.Conclusion: Compared with the IO approach, the IV approach appears to be the optimal route for adrenaline administration in advanced life support for OHCA during prehospital resuscitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]