Search

Background: Recent guidelines have emphasized actively avoiding fever to improve outcomes in patients who are comatose following resuscitation from cardiac arrest (ie, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest). However, whether targeted temperature management between 32°C and 36°C (TTM32-36) can improve neurologic outcome in some patients remains debated.Research Question: Is there an association between the use of TTM32-36 and outcome according to severity assessed at ICU admission using a previously derived risk score?Study Design and Methods: Data prospectively collected in the Sudden Death Expertise Center (SDEC) registry (France) between May 2011 and December 2017 and in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Continuous Chest Compressions (ROC-CCC) trial (United States and Canada) between June 2011 and May 2015 were used for this study. Severity at ICU admission was assessed through a modified version of the Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis (mCAHP) score, divided into tertiles of severity. The study explored associations between TTM32-36 and favorable neurologic status at hospital discharge by using multiple logistic regression as well as in tertiles of severity for each data set.Results: A total of 2,723 patients were analyzed in the SDEC data set and 4,202 patients in the ROC-CCC data set. A favorable neurologic status at hospital discharge occurred in 728 (27%) patients in the French data set and in 1,239 (29%) patients in the North American data set. Among the French data set, TTM32-36 was independently associated with better neurologic outcome in the tertile of patients with low (adjusted OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.15-2.30; P = .006) and high (adjusted OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.06-3.54; P = .030) severity according to mCAHP at ICU admission. Similar results were observed in the North American data set (adjusted ORs of 1.36 [95% CI, 1.05-1.75; P = .020] and 2.42 [95% CI, 1.38-4.24; P = .002], respectively). No association was observed between TTM32-36 and outcome in the moderate groups of the two data sets.Interpretation: TTM32-36 was significantly associated with a better outcome in patients with low and high severity at ICU admission assessed according to the mCAHP score. Further studies are needed to evaluate individualized temperature control following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Emergency research is challenging to do well as it involves time sensitive interventions in unstable patients. There is limited time to obtain informed consent from the patient or their legally authorized representative (LAR). Such research is permitted under exception from informed consent (EFIC) if specific criteria are met, including notification after enrollment. Some question whether the risks of EFIC outweighs its benefits. To date, there is limited empiric information about time to notification (TTN) and rates of withdrawal in such trials.Objective: To describe variation in TTN and rates of withdrawal among that patients enrolled in EFIC trials over a twelve-year period.Design: We performed post hoc descriptive analyses of data from five trials conducted under EFIC.Setting: Emergency medical services and receiving hospitals participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium in the United States and Canada.Participants: Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or life-threatening traumatic injury.Exposures: Notification strategies were specified at each site before initiation of enrollment by a local institutional review board. We monitored TTN within each site centrally throughout each study's enrollment period.Outcomes: TTN was defined as time from randomization to first-reported notification of patient or LAR of enrollment. Withdrawal was defined as patient or LAR opt out of ongoing participation at the time of notification.Results: Of 35,442 patients enrolled in five trials, 33,805 had cardiac arrest; and 1636 had traumatic injury. TTN varied overall and by patient outcome. Among those with cardiac arrest, TTN ranged from median (5%ile, 95%ile) of 6 (1,27) days to 28 (2, 53) days across sites. 0.3% of notified patients with cardiac arrest withdrew. Among those with traumatic injury, TTN ranged from 0 (0, 5) days to 36 (5, 68) days across sites. 7.7% of notified patients with traumatic injury withdrew.Conclusions and Relevance: There is large variation in TTN in trials conducted under EFIC for emergency research. This may be due to several factors. It may or may not be modifiable. Overall rates of withdrawal are low, which suggests current practices related to EFIC are acceptable to those who have participated in emergency research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Analyses of data recorded by monitor-defibrillators that measure CPR depth with different methods show significant relationships between the process and outcome of CPR. Our objective was to evaluate whether chest compression depth was significantly associated with outcome based on accelerometer-recordings obtained with monitor-defibrillators from a single manufacturer, and to assess whether an accelerometer-based analysis corroborated evidence-based practice guidelines on performance of CPR.Methods and Results: We included 5434 adult patients treated from seven US and Canadian cities between January 2007 and May 2015. These had mean (SD) age of 64.2 (17.2) years, mean compression depth of 45.9 (12.7) mm, ROSC sustained to ED arrival of 26%, and survival to hospital discharge of 8%. For survival to discharge, the adjusted odds ratios were 1.15 (95% CI, 0.86, 1.55) for cases within 2005 depth range (38-51 mm), and 1.17 (95% CI, 0.91, 1.50) for cases within 2010 depth range (>50 mm) compared to those with an average depth of <38 mm. The adjusted odds ratio of survival was 1.33 (95% CI, 1.01, 1.75) for cases within 2015 depth range (50 to 60 mm) for at least 60% of minutes.Conclusions: This analysis of patients with OHCA demonstrated that increased chest compression depth measured by accelerometer is associated with better survival. It confirms that current evidence-based recommendations to compress within 50-60 mm are likely associated with greater survival than compressing to another depth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A large, randomized trial showed no significant difference in survival to discharge between cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) strategies of 30 compressions with pause for 2 ventilations per cycle (30:2) and continuous chest compression with asynchronous ventilations (CCC). Data from the same trial suggested that adherence to the intended CPR strategy was associated with significantly greater survival. We sought to determine the adherence rate with intended strategy and then explore the association of adherence with survival to discharge in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC).Methods: This secondary analysis of data from the ROC included three interventional trials and a prospective registry. We modified an automated software algorithm that classified care as 30:2 or CCC before intubation based on compression segment length (defined as the elapsed time from start of compressions to subsequent pause of ≥2 s), number of pauses per minute ≥2 s in length and chest compression fraction. Intended CPR strategy for individual agencies was based on study randomization (during trial phase) or local standard of care (during registry phase). We defined CPR delivered as adherent when its classification matched the intended strategy. We characterized adherence with intended strategy across trial and registry periods. We examined its association with survival to hospital discharge using multivariate logistic regression after adjustment for Utstein and other potential confounders. Effect modification with intended strategy was assessed through a multiplicative interaction term.Results: Included were 26,810 adults with out of hospital cardiac arrest, of which 10,942 had an intended strategy of 30:2 and 15,868 an intended strategy of CCC. The automated algorithm classified 12,276 cases as CCC, 7037 as 30:2 and left 7497 as unclassified. Adherence to intended strategy was 54.4%; this differed by intended strategy (58.6% for CCC vs 48.3% for 30:2). Overall adherence was less during the registry phase as compared to during the trial phase(s). The association between adherence and survival was modified by treatment arm (CCC OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64-0.81 vs 30:2 OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.90-1.22; interaction p-value<0.01) after adjustment for known confounders.Conclusion: For intended strategy CCC, survival was significantly lower, OR (95%CI) = 0.72 (0.64, 0.81), when adhered to while for intended strategy 30:2, survival was higher, OR (95%CI) = 1.05 (0.90, 1.22), when adhered to. Intended strategy of 30:2 had lower adherence rates than CCC possibly a result of being a more difficult strategy to administer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Clinical trial investigators often assemble internal study monitoring committees (SMCs) to measure individual or group adherence with trial performance benchmarks. We examined the processes and results of study monitoring in an international trial of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Methods: We studied SMC operations for the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Continuous Chest Compressions (CCC) trial, which compared continuous with interrupted chest compressions upon survival after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. The SMC defined trial performance benchmarks, which included compliance with the intervention, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) process data availability and timely data completion. Trial investigators received monthly performance reports. We determined rates of trial noncompliance and suspension from the trial. Results: ROC‐CCC enrolled a total of 23,711 subjects in the primary analysis population. Across 113 enrolling agencies, the SMC monitored performance for a total 2,367 agency‐months. Emergency medical services agencies were on probation for a total of 178 (7.5%) agency‐months. Fifty‐five agencies were placed on probation at least once, of which 78% improved their performance and were approved for continued participation in the trial. A total of 12 agencies were suspended from trial participation. Data monitoring resulted in high‐quality CPR (mean chest compression fraction = 0.80), 87% CPR process availability and timely data completion (75th and 95th percentiles prehospital data = 22 and 57 days; hospital data = 58 and 118 days). Conclusions: Study monitoring procedures may play an important role in ensuring the performance quality in acute care clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: Editorials; death, sudden, cardiac; heart arrest; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest EN Editorials death, sudden, cardiac heart arrest out-of-hospital cardiac arrest 1775 1777 3 06/04/20 20200602 NES 200602 B Article, see p 1764 b Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest assessed by emergency medical services occurs in 347 000 Americans per year and in-hospital cardiac arrest occurs in another 209 000 individuals annually in the United States.[1] These events are often referred to as being sudden, in part because they may be the first clinical manifestation of heart disease, but the majority of them are associated with symptoms in the preceding hour.[2] Causative factors often are sought to inform prevention and intervention. Autoantibodies were present at significantly different levels in patients with cardiac arrest associated with myocardial ischemia, patients with cardiac arrest not associated with ischemia, and healthy controls. This work illustrates the usefulness of a high-throughput screening method to identify autoantibodies of interest and create profiles of autoantibody expression in patients with cardiac arrest associated or not with ischemia. [Extracted from the article]

Cardiac arrest is defined as the termination of cardiac activity associated with loss of consciousness, of spontaneous breathing, and of circulation. Sudden cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are terms often used interchangeably. Most patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have shown coronary artery disease or symptoms during the hour before the event. Cardiac arrest is potentially reversible by cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, cardioversion, cardiac pacing, or treatments targeted at the underlying disease (e.g., acute coronary occlusion). We restrict SCD hereafter to cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation, including rhythms shockable by an automatic external defibrillator (AED), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), or wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD). We summarize the state of the art related to defibrillation in treating SCD, including a brief history of the evolution of defibrillation, technical characteristics of modern AEDs, strategies to improve AED access and increase survival, ancillary treatments, and use of ICDs or WCDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) requires prompt intervention. Better outcomes are associated with briefer time from dispatch of emergency medical services (EMS) providers to arrival on scene, application of a defibrillator or insertion of an advanced airway. We assessed whether time from receipt of a call by a telecommunicator to dispatch of EMS providers was associated with outcomes.Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study of persons who had OHCA treated by EMS providers in Seattle, WA. Activation interval was defined as time from call pick up by telecommunicator to notification of EMS providers to respond to the call. Response interval was defined as the time from notification of EMS providers to their arrival at patient side. We determined the association between time intervals and outcomes of sustained restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital discharge and neurologically favorable survival using multiple logistic regression. Secondary analyses assessed the relative contribution of activation versus response interval, and adjusted for post-treatment patient and EMS characteristics.Results: Among 2,687 patients, activation interval was mean 1.2±0.6min. Response interval was mean 6.1±2.4min. 1,232 (45.9%) achieved ROSC; 475 (17.7%) survived to discharge; and 428 (15.9%) had favorable neurologic status at discharge. Compared to an activation interval of at least 1.5min, patients with briefer intervals were more likely to survive to discharge (adjusted odds ratio (OR) for <1min, 1.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.26, 2.28); adjusted odds ratio for 1 to 1.49min, 1.54 (95% CI, 1.14, 2.08); p value=0.002). With baseline survival of 10%, the absolute increase in survival associated with a 30s decrease in activation interval was 0.7% and for a 30s decrease in response interval was 0.4%.Conclusions: Briefer activation interval was independently associated with greater survival. Further research is needed to assess whether reduction of the activation interval improves outcome after OHCA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Efficient trials of interventions for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) should have adequate but not excess power to detect a difference in outcomes. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is the threshold value in outcomes observed in a trial at which providers should choose to adopt a treatment. There has been limited assessment of MCID for outcomes after OHCA. Therefore, we conducted an international survey of individuals interested in cardiac resuscitation to define the MCID for a range of outcomes after OHCA.Methods: A brief survey instrument was developed and modified by consensus. Included were open-ended responses. The survey included an illustrative example of a hypothetical randomized study with distributions of outcomes based on those in a public use datafile from a previous trial. Elicited information included the minimum significant difference required in an outcome to change clinical practice. The population of interest was emergency physicians or other practitioners of acute cardiovascular research.Results: Usable responses were obtained from 160 respondents (50% of surveyed) in 46 countries (79% of surveyed). MCIDs tended to increase as baseline outcomes increased. For a population of patients with 25% survival to discharge and 20% favorable neurologic status at discharge, the MCID were median 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 3, 10) percent for survival to discharge; median 5 (IQR 2, 10) percent for favorable neurologic status at discharge, median 4 (IQR 2, 9) days of ICU-free survival and median 4 (IQR 2, 8) days of hospital-free survival.Conclusion: Reported MCIDs for outcomes after OHCA vary according to the outcome considered as well as the baseline rate of achieving it. MCIDs of ICU-free survival or hospital-free survival may be useful to accelerate the rate of evidence-based change in resuscitation care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance Assessment of morbidity is an important component of evaluating interventions for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Objective We evaluated among survivors of OHCA cognition, functional status, health-related quality of life and depression as functions of patient and emergency medical services (EMS) factors. Design Prospective cohort sub-study of a randomized trial. Setting The parent trial studied two comparisons in persons with non-traumatic OHCA treated by EMS personnel participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Participants Consenting survivors to discharge. Main outcome measures Telephone assessments up to 6 months after discharge included neurologic function (modified Rankin score, MRS), cognitive impairment (Adult Lifestyle and Function Mini Mental Status Examination, ALFI-MMSE), health-related quality of life (Health Utilities Index Mark 3, HUI3) and depression (Telephone Geriatric Depression Scale, T-GDS). Results Of 15,794 patients enrolled in the parent trial, 729 (56% of survivors) consented. About 644 respondents (88% of consented) completed ≥ 1 assessment. Likelihood of assessment was associated with baseline characteristics and study site. Most respondents had MRS ≤ 3 (82.7%), no cognitive impairment (82.7% ALFI-MMSE ≥ 17), no severe impairment in health (71.6%, HUI3 ≥ 0.7) and no depression (90.1% T-GDS ≤ 10). Outcomes did not differ by trial intervention or time from hospital discharge. Conclusions and relevance The majority of patients in this large cohort who survived cardiac arrest and were interviewed had no, mild or moderate health impairment. Concern about poor quality of life is not a valid reason to abandon efforts to improve an EMS system's response to cardiac arrest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IMPORTANCE Hospital cooling improves outcome after cardiac arrest, but prehospital cooling immediately after return of spontaneous circulation may result in better outcomes. OBJECTIVE To determine whether prehospital cooling improves outcomes after resuscitation from cardiac arrest in patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF) and without VF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized clinical trial that assigned adults with prehospital cardiac arrest to standard care with or without prehospital cooling, accomplished by infusing up to 2 L of 4°C normal saline as soon as possible following return of spontaneous circulation. Adults in King County, Washington, with prehospital cardiac arrest and resuscitated by paramedics were eligible and 1359 patients (583 with VF and 776 without VF) were randomized between December 15, 2007, and December 7, 2012. Patient follow-up was completed by May 1, 2013. Nearly all of the patients resuscitated from VF and admitted to the hospital received hospital cooling regardless of their randomization. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and neurological status at discharge. RESULTS The intervention decreased mean core temperature by 1.20°C (95%CI, -1.33°C to -1.07°C) in patients with VF and by 1.30°C (95%CI, -1.40°C to -1.20°C) in patients without VF by hospital arrival and reduced the time to achieve a temperature of less than 34°C by about 1 hour compared with the control group. However, survival to hospital discharge was similar among the intervention and control groups among patients with VF (62.7%[95%CI, 57.0%-68.0%] vs 64.3%[95%CI, 58.6%-69.5%], respectively; P = .69) and among patients without VF (19.2%[95%CI, 15.6%-23.4%] vs 16.3%[95%CI, 12.9%-20.4%], respectively; P = .30). The intervention was also not associated with improved neurological status of full recovery or mild impairment at discharge for either patients with VF (57.5%[95%CI, 51.8%-63.1%] of cases had full recovery or mild impairment vs 61.9%[95%CI, 56.2%-67.2%] of controls; P = .69) or those without VF (14.4%[95%CI, 11.3%-18.2%] of cases vs 13.4% [95%CI,10.4%-17.2%] of controls; P = .30). Overall, the intervention group experienced rearrest in the field more than the control group (26%[95%CI, 22%-29%] vs 21% [95%CI, 18%-24%], respectively; P = .008), as well as increased diuretic use and pulmonary edema on first chest x-ray, which resolved within 24 hours after admission. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Although use of prehospital cooling reduced core temperature by hospital arrival and reduced the time to reach a temperature of 34°C, it did not improve survival or neurological status among patients resuscitated from prehospital VF or those without VF. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00391469 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Academic Emergency Medicine is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves outcomes after cardiac arrest. Much of the lay public is untrained in CPR skills. We evaluated the effectiveness of a compression-only CPR video self-instruction (VSI) with a personal manikin in the lay public. Methods: Adults without prior CPR training in the past year or responsibility to provide medical care were randomized into one of three groups: 1) Untrained before testing, 2) 10-minute VSI in compressions-only CPR (CPR Anytime, American Heart Association, Dallas, TX), or 3) 22-minute VSI in compressions and ventilations (CPR Anytime). CPR proficiency was assessed using a sensored manikin. The primary outcome was composite skill competence of 90% during five minutes of skill demonstration. Evaluated were alternative cut-points for skill competence and individual components of CPR. 488 subjects (143 in untrained group, 202 in compressions-only group and 143 in compressions and ventilation group) were required to detect 21% competency with compressions-only versus 7% with untrained and 34% with compressions and ventilations. Results: Analyzable data were available for the untrained group (n = 135), compressions-only group (n = 185) and the compressions and ventilation group (n = 119). Four (3%) achieved competency in the untrained group (p-value = 0.57 versus compressions-only), nine (4.9%) in the compressions-only group, and 12 (10.1%) in the compressions and ventilations group (p-value 0.13 vs. compressions-only). The compressions-only group had a greater proportion of correct compressions (p-value = 0.028) and compressions with correct hand placement (p-value = 0.0004) compared to the untrained group. Conclusions: VSI in compressions-only CPR did not achieve greater overall competency but did achieve some CPR skills better than without training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Hypothermia improves neurologic recovery compared to normothermia after resuscitation from out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation, but may or may not be beneficial for patients resuscitated from in-hospital cardiac arrest. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of induced hypothermia in a large cohort of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods: Retrospective analysis of multi-center prospective cohort of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest enrolled in an ongoing quality improvement project. Included were adults with a pulseless event in an in-patient hospital ward of a participating institution who achieved restoration of spontaneous circulation between 2000 and 2009. The exposure of interest was induced hypothermia. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. The secondary outcome was neurological status at discharge. Analyses evaluated all eligible patients; those with a shockable rhythm; or those with endotracheal tube inserted after resuscitation; and the effect of no hypothermia versus hypothermia (lowest temperature>32°C but≤34°C) versus overcooled (≤32°C). Associations were assessed using propensity score methods. Results: Included were 8316 patients with complete data, of whom 214 (2.6%) had hypothermia induced and 2521 (30%) survived to discharge. Of patients reported to receive hypothermia, only 40% were documented as achieving a temperature between 32°C and 34°C. Adjusted for known potential confounders using propensity score methods, induced hypothermia was associated with an odds ratio of survival of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.65, 1.23; p-value=0.49) compared to no hypothermia. Induced hypothermia was associated with an odds ratio of neurologically-favorable survival of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.65, 1.32; p-value=0.68) compared to no hypothermia. For patients with shockable first-recorded rhythm, induced hypothermia was associated with an odds ratio of survival of 1.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.68, 3.01; p-value=0.35) compared to no hypothermia. Conclusion: Hypothermia is induced infrequently in patients resuscitated from in-hospital cardiac arrest with only 40% achieving target temperatures. Induced hypothermia was not associated with improved or worsened survival or neurologically-favorable survival. The lack of benefit in this population may reflect lack of effect, inefficient application of the intervention, or residual confounding. High-quality controlled studies are required to better characterize the effect of induced hypothermia in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The impedance threshold device (ITD) is designed to enhance venous return and cardiac output during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by increasing the degree of negative intrathoracic pressure. Previous studies have suggested that the use of an ITD during CPR may improve survival rates after cardiac arrest. Methods: We compared the use of an active ITD with that of a sham ITD in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who underwent standard CPR at 10 sites in the United States and Canada. Patients, investigators, study coordinators, and all care providers were unaware of the treatment assignments. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with satisfactory function (i.e., a score of ≤3 on the modified Rankin scale, which ranges from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability). Results: Of 8718 patients included in the analysis, 4345 were randomly assigned to treatment with a sham ITD and 4373 to treatment with an active device. A total of 260 patients (6.0%) in the sham-ITD group and 254 patients (5.8%) in the active-ITD group met the primary outcome (risk difference adjusted for sequential monitoring, −0.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, −1.1 to 0.8; P=0.71). There were also no significant differences in the secondary outcomes, including rates of return of spontaneous circulation on arrival at the emergency department, survival to hospital admission, and survival to hospital discharge. Conclusions: Use of the ITD did not significantly improve survival with satisfactory function among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receiving standard CPR. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ROC PRIMED ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00394706.) [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: Background: Two simple questions have been used to classify neurologic outcome in patients with stroke. Could they be similarly applied to patients with cardiac arrest? Methods: As part of a randomized trial, study personnel interviewed by telephone survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to assess their outcomes 3 months after discharge. They asked two simple questions: (1) In the last 2 weeks, did you require help from another person for your everyday activities? and (2) Do you feel that you have made a complete mental recovery form your heart arrest? Next they administered the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) from the Adult Lifestyles and Function Interview (ALFI) to assess cognition on a scale from 0 to 22 and the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) to assess quality of life on a scale from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Results: Based on responses to the two simple questions, 32 survivors were classified as dependent (n =5, 16%), independent (n =3, 9%) and full recovery (n =24, 75%). The mean ALFI-MMSE score was 19.1 (standard deviation 5.1), and the mean HUI3 score was 0.76 (standard deviation 0.28). The classification based on the two simple questions was significantly correlated with ALFI-MMSE (p =0.002) and HUI3 (p =0.001). Scores for the HUI3 were missing in eight survivors. Conclusions: Neurologic outcomes based on the two simple questions after cardiac arrest can be easily determined, sensibly applied, and readily interpreted. These preliminary findings justify further evaluation of this simple and practical approach to classify neurologic outcome in survivors of cardiac arrest. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article focuses on a study which estimated the racial differences in survival for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrests. The study also examined the link between sociodemographic and clinical factors, and admitting hospital. It included 10,011 patients diagnosed with cardiac arrests due to ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. Such patients were from 274 hospitals within the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Study authors found that rates of survival to discharge are lower in black patients compared to white patients. They concluded that the racial difference in survival rates was associated with hospital center.

The article focuses on a study which focuses on the understanding of the hospital-level variation in rates of delayed defibrillation at acute-care hospitals in the U.S. It reveals that the adjusted rate of delayed defibrillation ranges from 2.4%-50.9% among hospitals. However, rates of delayed defibrillation through traditional hospital factors are largely unexplained. The result of the study reveals that the rates of delayed defibrillation varies among hospitals differently.

The article discusses out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) incidence and outcome, examining the question of whether there are regional differences that could be attributed to effective interventions used in some locations but not others. Reports of OHCA survival are highly variable, the article indicates. Topics include cardiac arrest incidence and outcome that vary across geographic regions and involvement of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) in the research. Also discussed is the exclusion from clinical trials of patients at higher risk of poor outcomes.

Summary: Objective: To describe the development, design and consequent scientific implications of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) population-based registry; ROC Epistry—Cardiac Arrest. Methods: The ROC Epistry—Cardiac Arrest is designed as a prospective population-based registry of all Emergency Medical Services (EMSs)-attended 9-1-1 calls for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurring in the geographical area described by the eight US and three Canadian regions. The dataset was derived by an North American interdisciplinary steering committee. Enrolled cases include individuals of all ages who experience cardiac arrest outside the hospital, with evaluation by organized EMS personnel and: (a) attempts at external defibrillation (by lay responders or emergency personnel), or chest compressions by organized EMS personnel; (b) were pulseless but did not receive attempts to defibrillate or CPR by EMS personnel. Selected data items are categorized as mandatory or optional and undergo revisions approximately every 12 months. Where possible all definitions are referenced to existing literature. Where a common definition did not exist one was developed. Optional items include standardized CPR process data elements. It is anticipated the ROC Epistry—Cardiac Arrest will enroll between approximately 9000 and 13,500 treated all rhythm arrests and 4000 and 5000 ventricular fibrillation arrests annually and approximately 8000 EMS-attended but untreated arrests. Conclusion: We describe the rationale, development, design and future implications of the ROC Epistry—Cardiac Arrest. This paper will serve as the reference for subsequent ROC manuscripts and for the common data elements captured in both ROC Epistry—Cardiac Arrest and the ROC trials. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Paul S. Chan, Graham Nichol and Brahmajee K. Nallamothu respond to a letter to the editor about their article "Time to Defibrillation After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest" in the January 3, 2008 issue.

1 L. Abazi, A. Awad, P. Nordberg, Long-term survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature control at 33 °C or 36 °C: a national registry study. 3 R. Salter, M. Bailey, R. Bellomo, Changes in temperature management of cardiac arrest patients following publication of the target temperature management trial. [Extracted from the article]

Summary: Background: Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest are common, lethal, debilitating and costly. Percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass is an innovative strategy for treating these disorders that consists of rapid initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass and extracorporeal maintenance of circulation until restoration of an effective cardiac output. Multiple case reports suggest that percutaneous bypass is efficacious in patients with these disorders but these experiences have not been collated. Therefore, we have reviewed systematically the published experience with percutaneous bypass in patients with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Objectives: The objectives were to describe the proportion of patients with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest who achieved restoration of spontaneous circulation or survival to discharge with percutaneous bypass. A secondary objective was to describe adverse effects associated with percutaneous bypass, if feasible. Design: Articles were identified by using a comprehensive search of English-language MEDLINE from 1966 to September 2005. Patients: Individuals in cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Interventions: Percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass. Analysis: Effects were summarized as inverse-variance weighted means, standard errors, median and interquartile range. Results: Included were 85 studies of 1494 patients with cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest or both. Studies were case reports, case-series or case-control studies of heterogeneous interventions in heterogeneous patients. The proportion of patients weaned was mean, 76.8±4.2%, and median, 66.0% (IQR 50%, 100%). The proportion of patients who survived to discharge was mean, 47.4±4.5%, and median 40.0% (IQR 20%, 75%). Fifty-two studies included 533 patients in cardiogenic shock. The proportion of patients who survived to discharge was mean, 51.6±6.5%, and median 38.5% (IQR 23.4%, 76.3%). Fifty-four studies included 675 patients in cardiac arrest. The proportion of patients who survived to discharge was mean, 44.9±6.7%, and median, 42.3% (IQR 15.4%, 75%). Five studies with 286 subjects had both patients with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Conclusions: Percutaneous bypass is an efficacious intervention in patients with cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock. Adequately-powered experimental studies of current percutaneous bypass technologies are required to demonstrate whether it is safe, effective and cost-effective. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Context: Cardiac arrests in adults are often due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT), which are associated with better outcomes than asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Cardiac arrests in children are typically asystole or PEA. Objective: To test the hypothesis that children have relatively fewer in-hospital cardiac arrests associated with VF or pulseless VT compared with adults and, therefore, worse survival outcomes. Design, Setting, and Patients: A prospective observational study from a multicenter registry (National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) of cardiac arrests in 253 US and Canadian hospitals between January 1, 2000, and March 30, 2004. A total of 36 902 adults ( 18 years) and 880 children (<18 years) with pulseless cardiac arrests requiring chest compressions, defibrillation, or both were assessed. Cardiac arrests occurring in the delivery department, neonatal intensive care unit, and in the out-of-hospital setting were excluded. Main Outcome Measure: Survival to hospital discharge. Results: The rate of survival to hospital discharge following pulseless cardiac arrest was higher in children than adults (27% [236/880] vs 18% [6485/36 902]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-2.68). Of these survivors, 65% (154/236) of children and 73% (4737/6485) of adults had good neurological outcome. The prevalence of VF or pulseless VT as the first documented pulseless rhythm was 14% (120/880) in children and 23% (8361/36 902) in adults (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.65; P<.001). The prevalence of asystole was 40% (350) in children and 35% (13 024) in adults (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.40; P = .006), whereas the prevalence of PEA was 24% (213) in children and 32% (11 963) in adults (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.78; P<.001). After adjustment for differences in preexisting conditions, interventions in place at time of arrest, witnessed and/or monitored status, time to defibrillation of VF or pulseless VT, intensive care unit location of arrest, and duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, only first documented pulseless arrest rhythm remained significantly associated with differential survival to discharge (24% [135/563] in children vs 11% [2719/24 987] in adults with asystole and PEA; adjusted OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 2.23-3.32). Conclusions: In this multicenter registry of in-hospital cardiac arrest, the first documented pulseless arrest rhythm was typically asystole or PEA in both children and adults. Because of better survival after asystole and PEA, children had better outcomes than adults despite fewer cardiac arrests due to VF or pulseless VT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest are at high risk of recurrent arrests, many of which could be prevented with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). We sought to determine the ICD insertion rate among survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and to determine factors associated with ICD implantation. Methods: The Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) study is a prospective, multiphase, before-after study assessing the effectiveness of prehospital interventions for people experiencing cardiac arrest, trauma or respiratory arrest in 19 Ontario communities. We linked OPALS data describing survivors of cardiac arrest with data from all defibrillator im-plantation centres in Ontario. Results: From January 1997 to April 2002, 454 patients in the OPALS study survived to hospital discharge after experiencing an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The mean age was 65 (standard deviation 14) years, 122 (26.9%) were women, 398 (87.7%) had a witnessed arrest, 372 (81.9%) had an initial rhythm of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF), and 76 (16.7%) had asystole or another arrhythmia. The median cerebral performance category at discharge (range 1-5, 1 = normal) was 1. Only 58 (12.8%) of the 454 patients received an ICD. Patients with an initial rhythm of VT/VF were more likely than those with an initial rhythm of asystole or another rhythm to undergo device insertion (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 9.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-71.50). Similarly, patients with a normal cerebral performance score were more likely than those with abnormal scores to undergo ICD insertion (adjusted OR 12.52, 95% CI 1.74-92.12). Interpretation: A minority of patients who survived cardiac arrest underwent ICD insertion. It is unclear whether this low usage rate reflects referral bias, selection bias by electrophysiologists, supply constraint or patient preference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors discuss several studies published within the issue which investigated improvements in the treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). They provide details of the studies which include the Amsterdam Resuscitation Study (ARREST) in the Netherlands and temporal changes in risk-adjusted survival after OHCA. They also emphasize the need for a simple, sustainable, and comparable approach to gathering major factors related to the risk after the onset of cardiac arrest.

The article discusses research being done on the use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) devices. It references the study "Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Meta-Analysis," by M. Westfall et al. published in the 2013 issue of "Critical Care Medicine." The researchers concluded that the restoration of circulation was the unifying theme in various studies of mechanical CPR devices in patients with cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVES: Given the uncertainty regarding the optimal approach for airway management for adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the use of supraglottic airways (SGAs) with tracheal intubation for initial airway management in OHCA. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, as well as unpublished sources, from inception to February 7, 2023. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult OHCA patients randomized to SGA compared with tracheal intubation for initial prehospital airway management. DATA EXTRACTION: Reviewers screened abstracts, full texts, and extracted data independently and in duplicate. We pooled data using a random-effects model. We used the modified Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool and assessed certainty of evidence using the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We preregistered the protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42022342935). DATA SYNTHESIS: We included four RCTs (n = 13,412 patients). Compared with tracheal intubation, SGA use probably increases return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (relative risk [RR] 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.15; moderate certainty) and leads to a faster time to airway placement (mean difference 2.5 min less; 95% CI, 1.6-3.4 min less; high certainty). SGA use may have no effect on survival at longest follow-up (RR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.84-1.34; low certainty), has an uncertain effect on survival with good functional outcome (RR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82-1.50; very low certainty), and may have no effect on risk of aspiration (RR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.16; low certainty). CONCLUSIONS: In adult patients with OHCA, compared with tracheal intubation, the use of SGA for initial airway management probably leads to more ROSC, and faster time to airway placement, but may have no effect on longer-term survival outcomes or aspiration events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses research about the involvement of bystanders in improving outcomes of patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Topics mentioned include the implementation of cardiac resuscitation systems of care, efforts of emergency medical services systems, and use of an automated external defibrillator.

A response from the authors to the article "Effect of Prehospital Induction of Mild Hypothermia on Survival and Neurological Status Among Adults With Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial" in the 2014 issue is presented.

Introduction: There is significant variation in hospital survival rates for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). Evidence-based performance measures (PM) have been proposed to estimate the quality of care for patients with IHCA. It is unclear if better quality of care for IHCA is associated with better outcomes. We evaluated: a) the degree of variability in quality of care after IHCA among US hospitals and b) whether PM were associated with patient outcomes. Methods: Hospital composite performance was calculated using six guideline recommended PM (Table) among US hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation (GWTG-R). Opportunity based composite performance scores were calculated for all patients, aggregated at the hospital level, divided into quartiles, and then associated with patient survival. Generalized linear mixed models assessed the independent association between these quartiles and risk-standardized rates of survival. Results: Our analysis included 149,551 IHCA patients treated at 447 GWTG-R hospitals between 2000 and 2012. Hospitals in the highest quartile had a composite performance score of 87.9% (IQR, 86.5 to 89.8%) compared with 70.5% (IQR, 66.7 to 73.2%) in the lowest performance quartile. There was significant variation in individual PM by hospital quartiles (Table). Risk standardized rates of survival were 16.7%, 18.4%, 19.1%, and 19.8% from the lowest to highest performance quartiles (p<0.001). Each 10% increase in a hospital's composite performance remained associated with an 18% higher odds of survival (adjusted OR, 1.18 [95% Cl, 1.12-1.23]); this relationship was consistent among subgroups with an initial cardiac arrest rhythm of VT/VF and asystole/pulseless electrical activity. Conclusions: The quality of evidenced-based care for IHCA varies widely among US hospitals and is associated with patient survival for both shockable and nonshockable rhythms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors discusses a study that developed a simple, bedside prediction tool that provides accurate estimation of favorable neurological survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. They cite the success of the Cardiac Arrest Survival Postresuscitation In-hospital (CASPRI) rule in meeting most criteria for a high-quality clinical prediction rule. While the tool provides accurate prognostication after cardiac arrest, the authors urges caution to those who consider applying the rule.

The authors discuss their cluster-randomised trial about the effect of the use of real-time (RT) audiovisual feedback devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outside hospital. They recruited 1586 patients who have cardiac arrest outside hospital in whom CPR was tried by emergency medical services from three sites in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium in North America. They found that improvements in CPR performance using RT feedback were not associated with improvements in return of spontaneous circulation or other clinical outcomes.

Objective: We sought to evaluate the utility and validity of ICU-free days and ventilator-free days as candidate outcomes for OHCA trials.Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial. We determined ICU-free (days alive and out of ICU during the first 30 days) and ventilator-free days (days alive and without mechanical ventilation). We determined ICU-free and ventilator-free day distributions and correlations with Modified Rankin Scale (MRS). We tested associations with trial interventions (laryngeal tube (LT), endotracheal intubation (ETI)) using continuous (t-test), non-parametric (Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test - WRS), count (negative binomial - NB) and survival models (Cox proportional hazards (CPH) and competing risks regression (CRR)). We conducted bootstrapped simulations to estimate statistical power.Main Results: ICU-free days was skewed; median 0 days (IQR 0, 0), survivors only 24 (18, 27). Ventilator-free days was skewed; median 0 (IQR 0, 0) days, survivors only 27 (IQR 23, 28). ICU-free and ventilator-free days correlated with MRS (Spearman's ρ = -0.95 and -0.97). LT was associated with higher ICU-free days using t-test (p = 0.001), WRS (p = 0.003), CPH (p = 0.02) and CRR (p = 0.04), but not NB (p = 0.13). LT was associated with higher ventilator-free days using t-test (p = 0.001), WRS (p = 0.001) and CRR (p = 0.03), but not NB (p = 0.13) or CPH (p = 0.13). Simulations suggested that t-test and WRS would have had the greatest power to detect the observed ICU- and ventilator-free days differences.Conclusion: ICU-free and ventilator-free days correlated with MRS and differentiated trial interventions. ICU-free and ventilator-free days may have utility in the design of OHCA trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background--The 2010 American Heart Association guidelines suggested an increase in cardiopulmonary resuscitation compression depth with a target >50 mm and no upper limit. This target is based on limited evidence, and we sought to determine the optimal compression depth range. Methods and Results--We studied emergency medical services-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Prehospital Resuscitation Impedance Valve and Early Versus Delayed Analysis clinical trial and the Epistry-Cardiac Arrest database. We calculated adjusted odds ratios for survival to hospital discharge, 1-day survival, and any return of circulation. We included 9136 adult patients from 9 US and Canadian cities with a mean age of 67.5 years, mean compression depth of 41.9 mm, and a return of circulation of 31.3%, 1-day survival of 22.8%, and survival to hospital discharge of 7.3%. For survival to discharge, the adjusted odds ratios were 1.04 (95% CI, 1.00-1.08) for each 5-mm increment in compression depth, 1.45 (95% CI, 1.20-1.76) for cases within 2005 depth range (>38 mm), and 1.05 (95% CI, 1.03-1.08) for percentage of minutes in depth range (10% change). Covariate-adjusted spline curves revealed that the maximum survival is at a depth of 45.6 mm (15-mm interval with highest survival between 40.3 and 55.3 mm) with no differences between men and women. Conclusions--This large study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients demonstrated that increased cardiopulmonary resuscitation compression depth is strongly associated with better survival. Our adjusted analyses, however, found that maximum survival was in the depth interval of 40.3 to 55.3 mm (peak, 45.6 mm), suggesting that the 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guideline target may be too high. Clinical Trial Registration--URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00394706. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: Little is known about triggers of sudden cardiac arrest. This study aimed to analyze the association of the occurrence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with patient activities just before the arrest and ambient temperature as one of the major environmental factors. Methods: This prospective, population-based cohort study enrolled all person aged 18 years or older with OHCA of presumed cardiac origin in Osaka Prefecture, Japan, from 2005 through 2007. Patient activities before arrest were divided into six categories: sleeping, bathing, working, exercising, non-specific activities, and unknown. Age-adjusted annual incidence rate of OHCA according to their prior activity and an hourly event rate in each activity by temperature were calculated. Results: Among 19,303 OHCAs, 10,723 were presumed to be of cardiac etiology. The event rate of OHCA was 6.22, 54.49, 1.15, and 10.11 per 10,000,000 population per hour for sleeping, bathing, working, and exercising, respectively. Among patients who suffered OHCA during bathing, the event rate of OHCA per 10,000,000 per hour increased with decreasing temperature from 18.27 (≥25.1°C) to 111.42 (≤5.0°C) (odds ratio [OR] for 1°C increase in temperature, 0.915; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.907–0.923), while it was almost constant among those who were working (OR for 1°C increase, 0.994; 95% CI, 0.981–1.007) or exercising (OR for 1°C increase, 1.004; 95% CI, 0.971–1.038) before arrest. Conclusion: Both activities before cardiac arrest and ambient temperature were associated with the occurrence of OHCA. Preventive measures against OHCA should be enveloped considering these behavioral and environmental factors. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Background: The primary objective of layperson CPR training is to ensure that learners achieve minimal competence to provide aid that improves the odds of survival of victims of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest. During CPR courses, pronouncement of a learner''s competence typically depends entirely on judgments made by an instructor; yet previous research strongly suggests that these judgments – particularly of chest compressions – are not sufficiently precise or accurate to ensure valid assessments. Comparisons of instructors’ subjective assessments with objective data from recording manikins provide one means of understanding the magnitude and type of instructor errors in assessment. Method: Eight hundred and twenty-six laypersons between 40 and 70 years old participated in CPR training. Performance of five discrete skills was tested in a scenario format immediately afterward: assessing responsiveness, calling the emergency telephone number 911, delivering ventilations of adequate volume, demonstrating correct hand placement for compressions, and delivering compressions with adequate depth. Thirteen AHA-certified instructors assessed these five skills and rendered a global performance rating; sensored Resusci Anne™ manikins with SkillReporting™ software recorded ventilation and compression data. Results: Instructors’ ratings of the ventilation skills were highly accurate; ratings of compressions were correct about 83% of the time; yet inadequate compression depth was rated adequate 55% of the time, and incorrect hand placement was rated adequate 49% of the time. Conclusion: Instructors’ judgments alone are not sufficient to determine learners’ competence in performing compressions. Assessment, technology, and guidelines must be better aligned so that learners can receive accurate feedback. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Expert guidelines advocate defibrillation within 2 minutes after an in-hospital cardiac arrest caused by ventricular arrhythmia. However, empirical data on the prevalence of delayed defibrillation in the United States and its effect on survival are limited. Methods: We identified 6789 patients who had cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia at 369 hospitals participating in the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Using multivariable logistic regression, we identified characteristics associated with delayed defibrillation. We then examined the association between delayed defibrillation (more than 2 minutes) and survival to discharge after adjusting for differences in patient and hospital characteristics. Results: The overall median time to defibrillation was 1 minute (interquartile range, <1 to 3 minutes); delayed defibrillation occurred in 2045 patients (30.1%). Characteristics associated with delayed defibrillation included black race, noncardiac admitting diagnosis, and occurrence of cardiac arrest at a hospital with fewer than 250 beds, in an unmonitored hospital unit, and during after-hours periods (5 p.m. to 8 a.m. or weekends). Delayed defibrillation was associated with a significantly lower probability of surviving to hospital discharge (22.2%, vs. 39.3% when defibrillation was not delayed; adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.54; P<0.001). In addition, a graded association was seen between increasing time to defibrillation and lower rates of survival to hospital discharge for each minute of delay (P for trend <0.001). Conclusions: Delayed defibrillation is common and is associated with lower rates of survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2008;358:9-17. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background:: The length of current 4-h classes in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a barrier to widespread dissemination of CPR training. The effectiveness of video-based self-instruction (VSI) has been demonstrated in several studies; however, the effectiveness of this method with older adults is not certain. Although older adults are most likely to witness out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, these potential rescuers are underrepresented in traditional classes. We evaluated a VSI program that comprised a 22-min video, an inflatable training manikin, and an audio prompting device with individuals 40–70 years old. The hypotheses were that VSI results in performance of basic CPR skills superior to that of untrained learners and similar to that of learners in Heartsaver classes. Methods:: Two hundred and eighty-five adults between 40 and 70 years old who had had no CPR training within the past 5 years were assigned to an untrained control group, Heartsaver training, or one of three versions of VSI. Basic CPR skills were measured by instructor assessment and by a sensored manikin. Results:: The percentage of subjects who assessed unresponsiveness, called the emergency telephone number 911, provided adequate ventilation, proper hand placement, and adequate compression depth was significantly better (P <0.05) for the VSI groups than for untrained controls. VSI subjects tended to have better overall performance and better ventilation performance than did Heartsaver subjects. Conclusions:: Older adults learned the fundamental skills of CPR with this training program in about half an hour. If properly distributed, this type of training could produce a significant increase in the number of lay responders who can perform CPR. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Patients with sudden cardiac arrest occurring in the acute phase of myocardial infarction (MI-SCA) are believed to be at similar risk of death after revascularization compared with MI patients without SCA (MI-no SCA). Among patients with anterior MI, we examined whether those with MI-SCA were at greater risk of all-cause mortality or sudden cardiac death (SCD) than MI-no SCA patients.Methods: The Home Automated External Defibrillator Trial enrolled patients with anterior MI who had not received or were candidates for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Our cohort included patients with a reported SCA event, in the acute phase of an MI, prior to HAT trial enrollment. Cox proportional hazards models examined the adjusted association between MI-SCA versus MI-no SCA patients and all-cause mortality and sudden cardiac death (SCD). We also determined whether the relationship between prior SCA and outcomes changed with subsequent events (syncope, revascularization, and recurrent MI) during follow-up.Results: Of 6849 patients, 650 (9.5%) had MI-SCA before trial enrollment. Approximately 48% of patients had the MI-SCA event ≤1 year prior to enrollment; 71% of SCA events were in-hospital. MI-SCA patients were younger, more frequently white, and had higher rates of prior PCI versus MI-no SCA patients. There were no differences in adjusted all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.65-1.38]) or SCD (HR 1.12; 95% CI 0.68-1.83) for MI-SCA vs. MI-no SCA. After ICD implantation, MI-SCA patients experienced higher all-cause mortality risk (HR 5.01, 95% CI 1.05-23.79) versus MI-no SCA patients; there was no mortality difference between MI-SCA and MI-no SCA patients without ICD implantation (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.60-1.31), [interaction p = 0.035].Conclusions: Patients with MI-SCA had similar adjusted risk of all-cause mortality and SCD compared with MI-no SCA. After ICD implantation, MI-SCA patients had higher mortality compared with MI-no SCA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]