Search

Objective: UGN-101 has been approved for the chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) involving the renal pelvis and calyces. Herein is the first reported cohort of patients with ureteral tumors treated with UGN-101., Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with UGN-101 for UTUC at 15 high-volume academic and community centers focusing on outcomes of patients treated for ureteral disease. Patients received UGN-101 with either adjuvant or chemo-ablative intent. Response rates are reported for patients receiving chemo-ablative intent. Adverse outcomes were characterized with a focus on the rate of ureteral stenosis., Results: In a cohort of 132 patients and 136 renal units, 47 cases had tumor involvement of the ureter, with 12 cases of ureteral tumor only (8.8%) and 35 cases of ureteral plus renal pelvic tumors (25.7%). Of the 23 patients with ureteral involvement who received UGN-101 induction with chemo-ablative intent, the complete response was 47.8%, which did not differ significantly from outcomes in patients without ureteral involvement. Fourteen patients (37.8%) with ureteral tumors had significant ureteral stenosis at first post-treatment evaluation, however, when excluding those with pre-existing hydronephrosis or ureteral stenosis, only 5.4% of patients developed new clinically significant stenosis., Conclusions: UGN-101 appears to be safe and may have similar efficacy in treating low-grade urothelial carcinoma of the ureter as compared to renal pelvic tumors., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Solomon Woldu receives honoraria for consulting for UroGen Pharma Ltd. Yair Lotan is involved in research with Pacific Edge Inc., Cepheid Inc., MDx Health and received honoraria for consulting for Nanorobotics, C2I genomics, Photocure, Astra-Zeneca, Merck, Fergene, Abbvie, Nucleix, Ambu, Seattle Genetics, Hitachi, Ferring Research, Verity Pharmaceutics, Virtuoso Surgical, Stimit, Urogen Pharma Ltd, Vessi medical, CAPs medical, Xcures, BMS, Nonagen, Aura Biosciences, Inc., Convergent Genomics, Pacific Edge, Pfizer, Phinomics Inc, CG oncology, Uroviu, On target lab., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: UGN-101 can be used for chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The gel can be administered via a retrograde route through a ureteral catheter or an antegrade route via a nephrostomy tube., Objective: To report outcomes of UGN-101 by route of administration., Design, Setting, and Participants: We performed a retrospective review of 132 patients from 15 institutions who were treated with UGN-101 for low-grade UTUC via retrograde versus antegrade administration., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Survival outcomes are reported per patient. Treatment, complications, and recurrence outcomes are reported per renal unit. Statistical analysis was performed for primary endpoints of oncological response and ureteral stricture occurrence., Results and Limitations: A total of 136 renal units were evaluated, comprising 78 retrograde and 58 antegrade instillations. Median follow-up was 7.4 mo. There were 120 cases (91%) of biopsy-proven low-grade UTUC. Tumors were in the renal pelvis alone in 89 cases (65%), in the ureter alone in 12 cases (9%), and in both in 35 cases (26%). Seventy-six patients (56%) had residual disease before UGN-101 treatment. Chemoablation with UGN-101 was used in 50/78 (64%) retrograde cases and 26/58 (45%) antegrade cases. A complete response according to inspection and cytology was achieved in 31 (48%) retrograde and 30 (60%) antegrade renal units (p = 0.1). Clavien grade 3 ureteral stricture occurred in 21 retrograde cases (32%) and only six (12%) antegrade cases (p < 0.01). Limitations include treatment bias, as patients in the antegrade group were more likely to undergo endoscopic mechanical ablation before UGN-101 instillation., Conclusions: These preliminary results show a significantly lower rate of stricture occurrence with antegrade administration of UGN-101, with no apparent impact on oncological efficacy., Patient Summary: We compared results for two different delivery routes for the drug UGN-101 for treatment of cancer in the upper urinary tract. For the antegrade route, a tube is inserted through the skin into the kidney. For the retrograde route, a catheter is inserted past the bladder into the upper urinary tract. Our results show a lower rate of narrowing of the ureter (the tube draining urine from the kidney into the bladder) using the antegrade route, with no difference in cancer control., (Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Intracavitary UGN-101 is approved for the treatment of low-grade noninvasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Post-commercialization studies underscore the benefit of UGN-101 administration for patients with imperative indications for whom radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is not a viable option., Objective: To describe the use, efficacy, and safety of UGN-101 in patients with UTUC with imperative indications for renal preservation, including high-grade disease., Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients receiving UGN-101 with imperative indications were retrospectively analyzed using a multicenter centralized registry from 15 high-volume academic and community centers., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: We defined imperative indications as patients with a solitary kidney, the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min, bilateral UTUC, and patients unfit for or unwilling to undergo surgical extirpation. Tumor characteristics, disease progression/recurrence, and adverse events were recorded on a per-renal-unit basis., Results and Limitations: UGN-101 was instilled into 52 renal units (38%) in 48 patients for imperative indications, including 29 patients (56%) with a solitary kidney, 11 kidneys (21%) in the setting of bilateral UTUC, six patients (12%) with CKD, and six patients (12%) who were unfit for or unwilling to undergo RNU. Twelve renal units had biopsy-proven high-grade papillary disease. Tumors were completely ablated before induction therapy in 34% of cases, while 66% had tumor present. Following induction therapy, 17 patients (40%) had no evidence of disease (NED) on ureteroscopy, 88% of whom maintained this status at median follow-up of 10.8 mo. In the cohort with high-grade disease, five patients (45%) had NED at initial post-induction primary disease evaluation. Adverse events included pyelonephritis (8%), ureteral stenosis (8%), anemia (6%), and acute renal failure (4%). Limitations include the retrospective study design, the lack of long-term follow up, and patient selection bias., Conclusions: Intracavitary therapy with UGN-101 in patients with UTUC and imperative indications shows promise as a kidney-sparing treatment modality. While long-term follow-up is needed, this intracavitary treatment may help in prolonging time to RNU and delaying the morbidity of hemodialysis in this comorbid population., Patient Summary: We reviewed results for patients with cancer in the upper urinary tract and an additional condition that would not allow kidney removal who received treatment with a gel called UGN-101. Our results suggest that UGN-101 shows promise as a kidney-sparing treatment. It may delay the time until kidney removal is needed in these patients and avoid the negative effects associated with dialysis., (Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the safety profile of antegrade mitomycin gel instillation through a percutaneous nephrostomy tube (PCNT) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with the aim of decreasing morbidity associated with therapy., Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing antegrade administration of mitomycin gel via PCNT were retrospectively included for analysis from four tertiary referral centres between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was safety profile, as graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0). Post-therapy disease burden was assessed by primary disease evaluation (PDE) via ureteroscopy., Results: Thirty-two patients received at least one dose of mitomycin gel via PCNT for UTUC, 29 of whom completed induction and underwent PDE. Thirteen patients (41%) had residual tumour present prior to induction therapy. At a median of 15.0 months following first dose of induction therapy, ureteric stenosis occurred in three patients (9%), all of whom were treated without later recurrence or chronic stenosis. Other adverse events included fatigue (27%), flank pain (19%), urinary tract infection (12%), sepsis (8%) and haematuria (8%). No patients had impaired renal function during follow-up and there were no treatment-related deaths. Seventeen patients (59%) had no evidence of disease at PDE and have not experienced recurrence at a median follow-up of 13.0 months post induction., Conclusions: Administration of mitomycin gel via a PCNT offers a low rate of ureteric stenosis, demonstrates a favourable safety profile, and is administered without general anaesthesia., (© 2022 The Authors. BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.)

Background: UGN-101 is a novel delivery system for intracavitary treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). UGN-101 was approved based on a pivotal trial for small volume residual low-grade UTUC. Our aim was to report our experience with UGN-101 in a more heterogenous and real-world setting., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all UGN-101 cases from 15 institutions with a focus on practice patterns, efficacy, and adverse effects. We include UGN-101 utilization in both the chemoablative and adjuvant setting., Results: There were a total 136 renal units treated from 132 patients. The majority of cases were biopsy proven low-grade UTUC. Practice patterns varied considerably - the most common administration technique was antegrade instillation via a percutaneous nephrostomy. When utilized in the adjuvant setting, 69% of patients were disease free at the time of their first endoscopic evaluation, while in the chemoablative setting, 37% were endoscopically clear on the first evaluation (P < 0.001). Complete response was higher in patients with smaller tumor size prior to UGN-101 induction; low volume (<1 cm) residual disease was associated with a 70% complete response, similar to disease free rate at first endoscopic evaluation when UGN-101 was used in the adjuvant setting. The use of maintenance doses of UGN-101 was reported in 27% of cases. The overall incidence of new onset, clinically significant ureteral stenosis was 23%., Conclusions: This study represents the largest review of patients treated with UGN-101 and can serve as a basis of ongoing hypotheses regarding treatment with UGN-101 for UTUC., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Solomon Woldu receives honoraria for consulting for UroGen Pharma Ltd. Yair Lotan is involved in research with Pacific Edge Inc., Cepheid Inc., MDx Health and received honoraria for consulting for UroGen Pharma Ltd., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: UGN-101 (mitomycin for pyelocalyceal solution) is a recently approved chemoablative treatment for low-grade (LG) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). While approved for retrograde or antegrade administration, previous reports discuss only patients treated by retrograde approach. We report our techniques for antegrade administration along with early outcomes from our cohort of patients who have undergone UGN-101 administration via nephrostomy., Materials and Methods: UGN-101 is administered as 6 weekly instillations in patients who have undergone endoscopic ablation of LG UTUC. We outline our approach in patients thought to have LG UTUC from initial ureteroscopy to nephrostomy placement, UGN-101 administration and eventual nephrostomy removal. We discuss early durability of response along with adverse events with special attention to ureteral strictures., Results: Eight patients underwent antegrade UGN-101 administration during the study period, all of whom underwent followup ureteroscopy with complete response in 4 patients. Three patients reported 5 adverse events-3 grade 1, 1 grade 2 requiring 1 week delay of treatment and 1 asymptomatic ureteral stricture. Median followup was 7 months., Conclusions: We outline our approach for antegrade administration of UGN-101 and discuss early results along with adverse events. Future studies should evaluate our method's potential to increase patient comfort, improve logistics and decrease risk of adverse events.

Purpose: Patients undergoing endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma often progress to definitive therapy with radical nephroureterectomy. This study examined the rate of progression as well as risk factors for transitions in treatment over time., Methods: Retrospective review at two institutions identified patients undergoing endoscopic management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Patients were assessed for progression to radical nephroureterectomy. Baseline characteristics were compared using Chi square analysis. Kaplan-Meier method analyzed the probability of patients not progressing to radical nephroureterectomy. Cox proportional hazards identified factors associated with progression to radical nephroureterectomy., Results: Eighty-one patients had endoscopic management alone and 89 progressed to radical nephroureterectomy. The two groups had similar age, histories of bladder cancer, and Charlson comorbidity index. Positive urinary cytology, ureteroscopic visualization, and biopsy grade were higher in those progressing to RNU (p < 0.001). Hazard modeling demonstrated higher rates of progression to radical nephroureterectomy with positive biopsy (HR 11.8, 95% CI 2.4-59.5, p = 0.003) or visible lesion on ureteroscopy (HR 8.4, 95% CI 3.0-23.9, p < 0.001). Patients with a higher Charlson comorbidity index were less likely to have radical nephroureterectomy. On Kaplan-Meier modeling, the probability of not undergoing radical nephroureterectomy at 2 years and 5 years was 50% and 20%, respectively., Conclusions: Patients who progress to radical nephroureterectomy after endoscopic management have fewer comorbid conditions and changes in disease status including visible lesions on ureteroscopy and positive biopsies. The high rate of progression to radical nephroureterectomy reinforces the need for long-term follow-up of these patients.

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of combination treatment of vascular targeted photodynamic therapy and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immunotherapy in a mouse model of urothelial carcinoma., Methods: We used C57BL/6 mice injected with murine bladder 49 cell line. Mice were randomly allocated into four treatment groups: vascular targeted photodynamic therapy only, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 only, combination therapy and control. We carried out three separate experiments that used distinct cohorts of mice: tumor growth and development of lung metastases monitored with bioluminescent imaging (n = 91); survival evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves (n = 111); and tumor cell population studied with flow cytometry (n = 20). In a fourth experiment, we re-challenged tumors in previously treated mice and compared tumor growth with that of naïve mice., Results: Combination therapy provided significant benefits over the other three treatment groups: prolonged survival (P < 0.0001), lower tumor signal (P < 0.0001) and decreased lung signal uptake (P ≤ 0.002). We also observed that mice previously treated with vascular targeted photodynamic therapy only or combination therapy did not present tumor growth after re-challenged tumors., Conclusions: Combination of vascular targeted photodynamic therapy with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 is an effective therapy in a urothelial carcinoma syngeneic mouse model. The present results suggest this therapy as a potential treatment option for both bladder and upper tract tumors in future clinical trials., (© 2019 The Japanese Urological Association.)

Purpose: Surgical management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma requires kidney and ureter removal, compromising renal function. Nonsurgical alternatives have potentially prohibitive safety concerns. We examined the feasibility and safety of ablation of the ureter and renal pelvis using endoluminal vascular targeted photodynamic therapy in a porcine model. We also report the efficacy of WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy in a murine model., Materials and Methods: After receiving approval we performed a total of 28 endoluminal ablations in the ureters and renal pelvis of 18 swine. Intravenous infusion of WST11 (4 mg/kg) followed by 10-minute laser illumination was done via percutaneous access or a retrograde ureteroscopic approach. Animals were followed clinically with laboratory testing, imaging and histology, which were evaluated at several postablation time points. A murine xenograft was created with the 5637 human urothelial cell carcinoma line to determine sensitivity to this therapy., Results: At 24 hours 50 mW/cm laser fluence produced superficial necrosis of the ureter. Deeper necrosis penetrating the muscularis propria or adventitia was produced by treatment with 200 mW/cm in the ureter and the renal pelvis. At 4 weeks superficial urothelium had regenerated over the treatment site. No symptomatic obstruction, clinically relevant hydronephrosis or abnormality of laboratory testing was noted up to 4 weeks. Of the mice 80% had no evidence of tumor 19 days after WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy., Conclusions: Urothelial cell carcinoma appears to be sensitive to WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy. The depth of WST11 vascular targeted photodynamic therapy treatment effects can be modulated in a dose dependent manner by titrating light intensity. Moreover, when applied to the porcine upper urinary tract, this treatment modality is feasible via antegrade and retrograde access., (Copyright © 2016 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)