Search

Introduction and Objective: Adjuvant studies with checkpoint inhibitors have attracted new interest in accurate pathological lymph node (LN) staging in renal cell carcinoma. Sentinel lymph node (SN) studies in cN0 patients revealed the pattern of lymphatic radiotracer drainage from renal tumors. The aim of this study was to describe the location of single- or oligometastatic LN and analyze if the topography of these first landing sites matches the drainage pattern observed in SN studies of renal tumors., Materials and Methods: We collected data from 8 referral centers from 1990 to 2018 of all patients with pT1-4 cN0 or cN1 M0 renal cell carcinoma with pathologically confirmed single- or oligometastases in locoregional LN. The location of LN metastases, number, size of metastatic LN, and survival were analyzed using descriptive statistics with SPSS version 22 (IBM, Chicago, IL)., Results: From 3,794 patients with histologically confirmed pN1, a total of 76 patients (2%) with single- or oligometastatic pN1 were identified, of whom 24 (31.6%) and 52 (68.4%) were cN0 and cN1, respectively. On the left side, LN metastases were predominantly located in the para-aortal (48.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 29.22-63.12%) and hilar (31.42%; 95% CI 17.4-49.4%) area. On the right side, metastases located in retrocaval (26.82%; 95% CI 14.7-43.2%), hilar (26.82%; 95% CI 14.7-43.2%), interaortocaval (26.82%; 95% CI 14.7-43.2%), and paracaval (17.07%; 95% CI 7.6-32.6%) LNs. These landing sites exactly matched the lymphatic drainage pattern of intratumorally injected radiotracer reported in SN studies for both sides., Conclusions: Single- or oligometastatic LNs in renal cancer are mainly located in the hilar, retro-, para, and interaortocaval region on the right side and para-aortal region on the left side. These first landing sites match the drainage pattern reported in SN trials., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Cancer du Rein Métastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangiogéniques (CARMENA) concluded that sunitinib alone is not inferior to cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. It remains uncertain whether deferred CN is beneficial in this setting., Objective: The aim of this study was to compare outcome in patients treated with presurgical VEGFR-TKI followed by CN (deferred CN) with that in patients receiving CN followed by VEGFR-TKI (upfront CN)., Design, Setting, and Participants: Pooled data from prospective trials in which a strategy of deferred CN in the absence of disease progression was investigated were compared with a retrospective dataset of upfront CN., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Overall survival (OS) in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) intermediate-risk group., Results and Limitations: Patients were treated between 2006 and 2016. In the MSKCC intermediate-risk group, 144 patients with a strategy of deferred CN after systemic therapy were compared with 131 patients treated with upfront CN. OS in the deferred cohort was 33.0 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.0-51.0) compared with 22.8 mo (95% CI 17.9-30.6) after upfront CN (hazard ratio 0.72 [95% CI 0.52-0.996], p = 0.047). This study is limited by retrospective comparison of data, subgroup analysis, and a lack of intention-to-treat data for the upfront CN cohort., Conclusions: In MSKCC intermediate-risk patients, a strategy of deferred CN in the absence of progression yields OS, which compares favourably with upfront CN and published trial data from CARMENA. This warrants a formal individual patient data analysis of CARMENA, SURTIME, and single-arm prospective studies to define the role and timing of deferred CN in intermediate-risk patients., Patient Summary: In this study, we report outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with targeted therapy followed by nephrectomy, which compared favourably with nephrectomy followed by targeted therapy and results from published studies., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Recent trials have emphasized the importance of a precise patient selection for cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN). In 2013, a nomogram was developed for pre- and postoperative prediction of the probability of death (PoD) after CN in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. To date, the single-institutional nomogram which included mostly patients from the cytokine era has not been externally validated. Our objective is to validate the predictive model in contemporary patients in the targeted therapy era., Methods: Multi-institutional European and North American data from patients who underwent CN between 2006 and 2013 were used for external validation. Variables evaluated included preoperative serum albumin and lactate dehydrogenase levels, intraoperative blood transfusions (yes/no) and postoperative pathologic stage (primary tumour and nodes). In addition, patient characteristics and MSKCC risk factors were collected. Using the original calibration indices and quantiles of the distribution of predictions, Kaplan-Meier estimates and calibration plots of observed versus predicted PoD were calculated. For the preoperative model a decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed., Results: Of 1108 patients [median OS of 27 months (95% CI 24.6-29.4)], 536 and 469 patients had full data for the validation of the pre- and postoperative models, respectively. The AUC for the pre- and postoperative model was 0.68 (95% CI 0.62-0.74) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.68-0.78), respectively. In the DCA the preoperative model performs well within threshold survival probabilities of 20-50%. Most important limitation was the retrospective collection of this external validation dataset., Conclusions: In this external validation, the pre- and postoperative nomograms predicting PoD following CN were well calibrated. Although performance of the preoperative nomogram was lower than in the internal validation, it retains the ability to predict early death after CN.

Objective: To investigate the rate of occult SN metastases, oncological outcome, and association of recurrence with the pattern of lymphatic tumour drainage in RCC., Materials and Methods: A pooled RCC sub-group analysis was conducted of secondary endpoints from a published feasibility and a phase II prospective single-arm SN study to investigate oncological outcome. Patients with cT1-3 (<10 cm) cN0M0 RCC of any sub-type were enrolled. After intratumoural injection of Tc 99m nanocolloid, pre-operative imaging of SNs with SPECT/CT was followed by (partial) nephrectomy with SN and regional lymph node dissection using a γ-probe. The patients were followed with a risk-adapted surveillance programme. Endpoints of the studies were analysed using Cox proportional hazard models., Results: Sixty-six RCC patients were included. Two patients (3%, 95% CI =0.5-11%) had occult SN metastases and remained free of disease at 57 and 72 months. Ten patients (15%, 95% CI =7-26%) developed recurrences, and four (6%, 95% CI =2.3-14.5%) had died of disease at a median follow-up of 57 months (IQR =18-72 months). Occurrence of distant metachronous metastases were associated with tumour size (HR =1.39, p = 0.02), pT stage (HR =6.83, p < 0.01 for comparison T1 vs T3/4), Grade 3/4 (HR =8.38, p = 0.05 for comparison 1/2 vs 3/4) and interaortocaval sentinel lymph node location (HR =10.52, p = 0.03 for comparison yes vs no)., Conclusions: The rate of occult metastatic SN is low, but long disease-free survival (DFS) was observed in two patients with occult SN metastases. We hypothesize an interaortocaval lymphatic route in thoracic recurrences. Evaluation of the prognostic and therapeutic role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) requires a clinical trial in high-risk RCC.

Introduction: Although the broad use of ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) has led to an early diagnosis of the disease, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains one of the most lethal urological cancers. The present review is based on the latest data published on RCC management., Evidence Acquisition: A literature search was carried out searching recent publications from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase up to December 2016 as well as European Association of Urology (EAU) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines., Evidence Synthesis: A narrative synthesis based on recent publications was undertaken. Current evidence regarding treatment strategies and guidelines is based on prospective randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies although the level of evidence for surgical management is generally lower than for systemic therapy., Conclusions: This narrative review depicts a summary of the evidence base for treatment of RCC. Management of RCC is a rapidly evolving and changing field. As a consequence guidelines need regular updating and patients may benefit from centralization of care and multidisciplinary approach.

Objective: To evaluate the probability of downsizing primary renal tumors by targeted therapy in correlation to size., Methods: A literature search was conducted and our own data were pooled with data of retrospective series and prospective trials in which patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and in which tumor sizes before and after treatment were reported. Included were 89 primary clear cell renal tumors, including 34 from our institutes. The longest diameter of the primary tumors before and after treatment was obtained. Primary tumor size at presentation was divided in 4 categories: <5 cm (n=10), 5 to 7 cm (n=21), 7 to 10 cm (n=31), and >10 cm (n=27). Pearson correlation and t test were used for statistical analysis., Results: The TKI was sorafenib in 21 tumors and sunitinib in the remaining 68. Smaller tumor size was related to more effective downsizing (P=0.01). Median downsizing was 32% (-46% to 11%) in the first group (<5 cm) and 11% (-55% to 16%) in the second group (5-7 cm); however, 8 of 21 (38%) in this group reduced to a range of 2.3 to 4.7 cm in which ablative techniques are feasible and nephron-sparing surgery may benefit from the reduced size. Median downsizing was 18% (-39% to 2%) in tumors of 7 to 10 cm and 10% (-31% to 0%) in those>10 cm., Conclusion: The smaller the primary tumor, the greater the likelihood and the more effective the downsizing. A potential benefit of neoadjuvant treatment to downsize the primary tumor for ablative techniques or nephron-sparing surgery may exist, particularly in tumors sized 5 to 7 cm., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)