Search

Objective: While several studies reported epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in salivary gland cancer (SGC), results varied due to a lack of unified definition of EGFR positivity. In this study, we assessed the EGFR expression level using both EGFR positive score and cumulative EGFR score in the patients with SGC., Methods: Between January 2010 and April 2021, 102 patients with SGC who underwent surgical resection were reviewed retrospectively by immunohistochemistry. The membrane staining intensity was scored as follows: no staining (0), weak staining (1+), intermediate staining (2+), and strong staining (3+). The cumulative EGFR score was determined on a continuous scale of 0-300 using the formula:1 × (1+: percentage of weakly stained cells) + 2 × (2+: percentage of moderately stained cells) + 3 × (3+: percentage of strongly stained cells)., Results: EGFR expression in SGC varied widely even among the same as well as different histopathological types. The average EGFR positive scores were 46.0 %, 55.7 %, 51.6 %, 1.0 %, 26.8 %, 50 %, and 76.8 % for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), acinic cell carcinoma (AcCC), adenocarcinoma NOS (ACNOS), carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CAexPA), and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), respectively. The average cumulative EGFR scores were 82, 91, 80, 1, 52, 93, and 185 for MEC, SDC, AdCC, AcCC, ACNOS, CAexPA, and SqCC, respectively., Conclusions: EGFR positive scores and cumulative EGFR scores in SGCs varied among the various histological types, and even in the same histological type. These scores may predict the clinical outcome of SGC treated with EGFR-targeting therapies, such as head and neck photoimmunotherapy, and need to be evaluated in future studies., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Aims: To investigate the histological diversity of salivary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), its clinicopathological features, and its associations with CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions., Methods and Results: Salivary MEC cases (n = 177) were examined for CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions, histological variants were classified, and tumours were graded according to four different grading systems. Adverse histological features considered to be unusual in MEC were also investigated. Of the 177 MEC cases, 110 were positive for CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions. The classical variant was the most frequent in the fusion-positive case group, the fusion-negative case group, and the total case group. The clear/oncocytic variant was the second most frequent in the fusion-positive and total case groups. Oncocytic, Warthin-like and spindle variants were seen in the fusion-positive case group only. Clear cell, sclerosing, mucinous and central variants were seen in both the fusion-positive case group and the fusion-negative case group. No case was classified as a ciliated variant, as a mucoacinar variant, or as a high-grade transformation. As compared with the classical variant, non-classical variants were characterised by frequent CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions and a low clinical stage in all cases. Of the four histological features considered to be unusual in MEC, marked nuclear atypia, frequent mitoses (>10/10 high-power fields) and extensive necrosis were found independently of the fusion status, and were present in 3-5% of all cases. However, none of the cases showed overt keratinisation. On comparison, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology and modified Healey grading systems downgraded tumours, the Brandwein system upgraded tumours, and the Memorial Sloan Kettering system provided a moderate means of assessment., Conclusion: Recognition of the histological diversity of MEC, its clinicopathological features and its associations with CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions is helpful for an accurate diagnosis of this carcinoma., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is rare, but the most common primary malignancy of the salivary gland and not infrequent in young individuals. CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions are frequently detected in MEC and are useful as a diagnostic biomarker. However, there has been debate as to whether the fusions have prognostic significance. In this study, we retrospectively collected 153 salivary gland MEC cases from 11 tertiary hospitals in Japan. As inclusion criteria, the MEC patients in this study had curative surgery as the initial treatment, received no preoperative treatment, and had no distant metastasis at the time of the initial surgery. The MEC diagnosis was validated by a central pathology review by five expert salivary gland pathologists. The CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions were detected using FISH and RT-PCR. In 153 MEC cases, 90 (58.8%) were positive for CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions. During the follow-up period, 28 (18.3%) patients showed tumor recurrence and 12 (7.8%) patients died. The presence of the fusions was associated with favorable tumor features. Of note, none of the fusion-positive patients died during the follow-up period. Statistical analysis showed that the presence of the fusions was a prognostic indicator of a better overall survival in the total and advanced-stage MEC cohorts, but not in the early-stage MEC cohort. In conclusion, CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions are an excellent biomarker for favorable overall survival of patients with salivary gland MEC., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Aims: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is one of the most common salivary gland carcinomas. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling pathway gene mutations are important in predicting a patient's prognosis, selecting molecularly targeted drugs and estimating the efficacy of a molecular therapy. However, their significance in MEC have been poorly clarified. CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions are specific to MEC and may be associated with favourable characteristics in these patients., Methods and Results: We looked for CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions and gene alterations in the EGFR, RAS family (KRAS, HRAS and NRAS), PIK3CA, BRAF and AKT1 in 101 MEC cases. We also examined mutations in TP53. CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions were found in 62.4% of the cases. KRAS, HRAS and PIK3CA mutations were detected in 6.9%, 2.0% and 6.9%, respectively, but other EGFR pathway genes were not mutated. In total, gene mutations (RAS/PIK3CA) in the EGFR pathway were detected in 14.9% of the cases. TP53 mutations were found in 20.8%. CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions were associated with a better prognosis and RAS/PIK3CA mutations a worse prognosis of the patients, respectively, and both were selected as independent prognostic factors for the overall survival of the patients. TP53 mutations had no prognostic impact. CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion-positive rates were inversely associated with the patients' age and the fusions were found in 82% of patients aged < 30 years., Conclusions: RAS/PIK3CA mutations were frequently detected, and may be a biomarker for a poorer prognosis in MEC patients. CTRC1/3-MAML2 fusions were positive in most of the young MEC patients., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend considering postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for completely resected T1/2N0M0 salivary mucoepidermoid carcinomas when they show tumor spillage, perineural invasion, or intermediate/high-grade histology. CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions have been associated with a favorable clinical outcome., Methods: Forty-seven T1/2N0M0 mucoepidermoid carcinoma cases positive for CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions were completely resected and were not treated with PORT., Results: Pathologically, none of the cases showed tumor spillage or perineural invasion. Cases with intermediate/high-grade histology numbered 9 (19%) to 26 (55%) with the currently used 3 different grading systems. During the follow-up (median 60 months), locoregional tumor recurrence occurred in 4 cases, which were treated with surgery alone. At the last follow-up (median 60 months; 7-160), all patients were alive with no evidence of disease., Conclusion: An excellent prognosis may be achieved without PORT in T1/2N0M0 mucoepidermoid carcinoma patients positive for CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusions when the tumors are completely resected without tumor spillage., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

In mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), CRTC1-MAML2 fusion indicates a favorable prognosis. Amphiregulin (AREG), an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) ligand, has been shown to be a downstream target of CRTC1-MAML2 fusion, and to play a role in tumor growth and survival in CRTC1-MAML2-positive MEC cell lines. The aim of this study was to characterize the AREG and EGFR expression in the fusion-positive and fusion-negative MEC of the major salivary gland. The AREG and EGFR expression were studied by immunochemistry in 33 MEC cases of the major salivary glands. CRTC1-MAML2 fusion was tested by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (23 CRTC1-MAML2 fusion-positive, 10 fusion-negative). Of 23 fusion-positive cases, AREG and EGFR overexpression were detected in 17 (73.9%) and 14 (60.9%) cases, respectively. Of 10 fusion-negative cases, AREG and EGFR overexpression were detected in 1 (10%) and 3 (30.0%) cases, respectively. There was a positive correlation between CRTC1-MAML2 fusion and AREG overexpression (P < .01), but not between CRTC1-MAML2 fusion and EGFR overexpression. The AREG overexpression was associated with a longer disease-free survival of the MEC patients (P = .042), but EGFR overexpression was not. In this study, we showed that AREG overexpression was detected more frequently in the CRTC1-MAML2 fusion-positive tumors than in fusion-negative tumors. Detection of AREG expression may be useful for identifying CRTC1-MAML2-positive MECs and as a marker for favorable prognosis., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)