Search

Purpose: To compare the long-term outcomes of anatomic resection (AR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with an ablative margin (AM) of ≥ 1.0 cm as first-line treatment for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma measuring ≤ 3 cm., Methods: Two hundred and fifty-one patients who underwent AR (n = 156) or RFA (ablative margin ≥ 1.0 cm, n = 95) at any of 6 tertiary hospitals from 2009 to 2018 were enrolled. Propensity score matched analysis (PSM) were used to compare overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and perioperative outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors associated with RFS and OS., Results: PSM created 67 patient-pairs. After 96 months of follow-up, RFA with an ablative margin ≥ 1.0 cm and AR showed comparable 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 8-year OS rates before (P = 0.580) and after (P = 0.640) PSM. However, RFS was better at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years after AR before (P = 0.0036) and after (P = 0.017) PSM. The operation time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly longer in the AR group than in the RFA group before and after PSM (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified age and type of treatment to be independent prognostic factors for RFS and age and hepatitis C to be associated with OS., Conclusions: Long-term OS was not significantly different between AR and RFA with an AM ≥ 1.0 cm in patients with a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma measuring ≤ 3 cm; but, RFS appeared to be better after AR than after RFA. However, RFA was associated with fewer perioperative complications and a shorter postoperative hospital stay., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for such hemangiomas (5-9.9 cm in diameter)., Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study investigated the differences in technical success, ablation time, complete ablation, complications, hospital stay, and clinical response between MWA and RFA. A total of 452 patients with hepatic hemangiomas were screened. Propensity score matching was performed. Univariable and multivariate regression analyses were used., Results: Among the 452 patients, 394 met the eligibility criteria and completed the follow-up. After the propensity score matching analysis, 72 pairs of patients were created. No technical failures were found. The RFA group had a longer ablation time (48.63 ± 18.11 min versus [vs.] 37.18 ± 15.86 min, p < 0.001), higher morbidity of hemoglobinuria (77.78% vs. 50.00%, p < 0.001), and longer hospital stay (5.01 ± 1.56 days vs. 4.34 ± 1.42 days, p < 0.05) than the MWA group. The treatment methods (p = 0.032, OR = 0.105, 95% CI = 0.013-0.821), size of the hemangioma (p = 0.021, OR = 5.243, 95% CI = 1.285-21.391), and time of ablation (p = 0.031, OR = 1.145, 95% CI = 1.013-1.294) were significant independent risk factors associated with hemoglobinuria. No recurrence or delayed complications were observed. There were no differences in complete ablation, clinical response, and health-related quality of life between the groups., Conclusions: MWA and RFA appear to be effective treatments for large hepatic hemangiomas. However, MWA had a shorter ablation time than RFA, and MWA was associated with fewer hemolysis-related complications and shorter hospital stays., Key Points: • MWA and RFA appear to be effective treatments for large hepatic hemangiomas. • MWA had a shorter ablation time than RFA. • MWA was associated with fewer hemolysis-related complications and shorter hospital stays., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Understanding the mechanisms underlying evasive resistance in cancer is an unmet medical need to improve the efficacy of current therapies. In this study, a combination of shRNA-mediated synthetic lethality screening and transcriptomic analysis revealed the transcription factors YAP/TAZ as key drivers of Sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by repressing Sorafenib-induced ferroptosis. Mechanistically, in a TEAD-dependent manner, YAP/TAZ induce the expression of SLC7A11, a key transporter maintaining intracellular glutathione homeostasis, thus enabling HCC cells to overcome Sorafenib-induced ferroptosis. At the same time, YAP/TAZ sustain the protein stability, nuclear localization, and transcriptional activity of ATF4 which in turn cooperates to induce SLC7A11 expression. Our study uncovers a critical role of YAP/TAZ in the repression of ferroptosis and thus in the establishment of Sorafenib resistance in HCC, highlighting YAP/TAZ-based rewiring strategies as potential approaches to overcome HCC therapy resistance., (© 2021 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.)

Autophagy perturbation represents an emerging therapeutic strategy in cancer. Although LATS1 and LATS2 kinases, core components of the mammalian Hippo pathway, have been shown to exert tumor suppressive activities, here we report a pro-survival role of LATS1 but not LATS2 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. Specifically, LATS1 restricts lethal autophagy in HCC cells induced by sorafenib, the standard of care for advanced HCC patients. Notably, autophagy regulation by LATS1 is independent of its kinase activity. Instead, LATS1 stabilizes the autophagy core-machinery component Beclin-1 by promoting K27-linked ubiquitination at lysine residues K32 and K263 on Beclin-1. Consequently, ubiquitination of Beclin-1 negatively regulates autophagy by promoting inactive dimer formation of Beclin-1. Our study highlights a functional diversity between LATS1 and LATS2, and uncovers a scaffolding role of LATS1 in mediating a cross-talk between the Hippo signaling pathway and autophagy.