Search

Purpose: Carcinoid and islet cell tumors are known to be highly vascular. There is no effective systemic therapy currently available for metastatic disease. We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of the anti-antiangiogenic agent thalidomide in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors., Patients and Methods: Eighteen patients with measurable, histologically proven metastatic carcinoid neuroendocrine carcinomas (well-differentiated, n = 13; moderately-differentiated, n = 5) were enrolled on this study. The majority of the patients had gastrointestinal primaries (small bowel, 8; pancreas, 5; colon, 1). All but one patient had hepatic metastases, and 12 patients (67%) had carcinoid syndrome. All patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero or one. Eight patients (44%) had received previous hepatic artery chemoembolization and 11 (61%) had undergone surgical resection. Patients were started on oral thalidomide at a daily dose of 200 mg that was escalated to the target dose of 400 mg daily after 2 weeks. Tumor response was assessed at 12-week intervals using RECIST criteria. Planned treatment duration was 24 weeks unless unacceptable toxicity or disease progression was observed., Results: No patient achieved a partial remission or a complete remission. Best response was stable disease (SD) in 11 of 16 response-evaluable patients (69%). Serum pancreastatin results did not correlate with clinical response. Grade 3 toxicities included dizziness with orthostatic hypotension (n = 5), sensory neuropathy (n = 2), fatigue (n = 2), hemorrhagic cystitis (n = 1), and deep venous thrombosis (n = 1). Frequent Grade 1-2 toxicities were: fatigue (n = 13), constipation (n = 13), dry mouth (n = 12), somnolence (n = 12), dizziness/syncope (n = 10), weight gain (n = 5), and peripheral neuropathy (n = 5)., Conclusions: Thalidomide was fairly well tolerated in patients with metastatic carcinoid/islet cell tumors, but failed to reveal any objective responses. The single stage design of the trial makes it difficult to determine whether observed SD in a subset of patients was attributable to the indolent nature of these tumors, or to beneficial effect of thalidomide.

Purpose: There are few treatment options for patients with metastasized or inoperable endocrine gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors. Chemotherapy can be effective, but the response is usually less than 1 year. Here, we present the results of treatment with a radiolabeled somatostatin analog, [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate (177Lu-octreotate)., Patients and Methods: One hundred thirty-one patients with somatostatin receptor-positive tumors were treated with up to a cumulative dose of 600 to 800 mCi (22.2 to 29.6 GBq) of 177Lu-octreotate., Results: One patient developed renal insufficiency, and another patient developed hepatorenal syndrome. Creatinine clearance did not change significantly in the other patients. WHO hematologic toxicity grade 3 or 4 occurred after less than 2% of the administrations. We observed complete remission in three patients (2%), partial remission in 32 patients (26%), minor response (tumor diameter decrease of 25% to 50%) in 24 patients (19%), stable disease (SD) in 44 patients (35%), and progressive disease (PD) in 22 patients (18%). Higher remission rates were positively correlated with high uptake on pretherapy somatostatin receptor imaging and a limited number of liver metastases, whereas PD was significantly more frequent in patients with a low performance score and extensive disease. Median time to progression in 103 patients who either had SD or tumor regression was more than 36 months., Conclusion: Treatment with 177Lu-octreotate results in tumor remission in a high percentage of patients with GEP tumors. Serious side effects are rare. The median time to progression compares favorably with chemotherapy. Results are better in patients with a limited tumor load. Therefore, early treatment, even in patients who have no PD, may be better.

Background: New agents with antitumor activity in patients with neuroendocrine tumors are sorely needed. A Phase II study of high-dose paclitaxel in patients with metastatic carcinoid and islet cell tumors was performed at the Mayo Clinic. Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) also was administered to ameliorate neutropenia., Methods: Twenty-four patients (14 with carcinoid tumors, 9 with islet cell tumors, and 1 with an anaplastic tumor) were enrolled on this Phase II study of paclitaxel given as a 24-hour continuous infusion at a dose of 250 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks plus GCSF at a dose of 5 microg/kg/day subcutaneously, beginning 24 hours after the completion of the paclitaxel dose and continuing until the absolute neutrophil count was > 10,000/microL., Results: All 24 patients were evaluable for analysis. The overall response rate was 8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0-0.11). At last follow-up all patients except 1 had developed disease progression, with an estimated median time to disease progression of 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.6-6.0 months). The estimated median survival was 1.5 years (95% CI, 1.0-1.8 years). Hematologic toxicity was significant with 12 of 24 patients developing Grade 4 (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria scale) neutropenia; however, there were no septic deaths reported. There were 17 episodes of Grade 4 neutropenia in these 12 patients and the duration of these events ranged from 2-5 days. More common nonhematologic toxicities included arthralgia (21 patients), anorexia (15 patients), nausea (15 patients), diarrhea (12 patients), and allergic reactions (2 patients)., Conclusions: Given the lack of antitumor activity of paclitaxel and the significant hematologic toxicity observed despite the use of GCSF support in the current study cohort of patients with neuroendocrine tumors, further studies of this combination in this particular patient population are not recommended., (Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Octreotide, a long-acting somatostatin analogue, has demonstrated clinical utility in patients with carcinoid syndrome and malignant islet cell tumors of the pancreas. Prior studies have reported a greater than expected incidence of cholelithiasis in patients treated with octreotide for acromegaly. This study attempted to determine the incidence and morbidity of cholelithiasis in a group of patients with metastatic carcinoid or malignant pancreatic islet cell tumors who were receiving chronic therapy with octreotide., Methods: Forty-four of 55 patients on investigational protocols with octreotide were eligible for chart review; 10 patients were excluded due to prior cholecystectomy and 1 patient due to asymptomatic cholelithiasis at presentation. Patients fell into three treatment groups. The low dose (LD) group was comprised of 17 patients receiving 150 microg of subcutaneous octreotide 3 times a day. Twenty-one patients received high dose (HD) therapy comprised of 500 microg given 3 times a day. The low dose-high dose (LD-HD) group was comprised of 6 patients who had their dose escalated from 150 microg to 225-500 microg of octreotide 3 times a day., Results: The overall incidence of cholelithiasis and/or gallbladder sludge was found to be 52.3% in all 3 treatment groups. Three of the 44 patients (6.8%) had symptomatic disease requiring emergency cholecystectomy. Five other patients underwent elective or incidental gallbladder surgery. The incidence of cholelithiasis in the LD, LD-HD, and HD groups was 35.3%, 66.6%, and 61.9%, respectively. The incidence of acute cholecystitis in the three groups was 11.8%, 0%, and 4.8%, respectively., Conclusions: Although greater than 50% of patients receiving octreotide developed cholelithiasis, a much smaller percentage of patients had symptomatic gallbladder disease. Patients receiving chronic octreotide treatment require monitoring for the development of gallstones. However, prophylactic cholecystectomy is not indicated, unless it is performed in conjunction with bowel resection or cytoreductive hepatic surgery.

Background: The unsatisfactory control of neuroendocrine tumor growth with chemotherapy and/or interferon (IFN-2a) stimulated us to investigate the role of the somatostatin analogue octreotide (SMS 201.995), which is reported to be highly effective in controlling carcinoid syndrome symptoms. Octreotide has been used in a wide range of doses, and it was postulated that higher doses might lead to an objective response., Methods: The aim of the present multicenter Phase II study was to determine the safety and efficacy of SMS 201.995 in controlling carcinoids and other neuroendocrine tumors. Fifty-eight patients were treated subcutaneously with 2 sequential doses of the drug (Sandostatina, Sandoz, Inc., S.b.A. Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland). The first 23 patients received 500 micrograms 3 times a day and the remaining 35 patients received 1000 micrograms 3 times a day. The treatment was continued until the tumor progressed., Results: All of the patients were adequately treated and evaluated. The predominant histotype was carcinoid, although there were instances of medullary thyroid carcinoma, pancreatic islet cell tumors, and Merkel cell carcinoma. Carcinoid syndrome was documented in 16 patients and abnormal urinary 5-hydroxyindoloacetic acid excretion in 15. The median treatment duration was 5 months (range, 2-31 months). The responses were evaluated in three categories: tumor regression for tumor growth control, symptom response, and biochemical response. There was an effect on tumor growth in two patients with carcinoids. Symptomatic control was achieved in 73% of patients and a biochemical response in 77% of patients. In twenty-seven patients, the disease stabilized for at least 6 months (range, 6-32+). The median survival time for all patients was 22 months (range, 1-32+)., Conclusions: In terms of tumor regression, octreotide is disappointing (partial response: 3%); symptomatic response and biochemical control are satisfactory. These data confirm that somatostatin analogues are comparable to interferons in the treatment of carcinoid syndrome, although other efforts are necessary to control tumor regression.

Background: Although patients with neuroendocrine tumors typically exhibit an indolent clinical course, the pace of disease accelerates and the prognosis deteriorates once objective progression of disease begins. Thirty-four patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors were treated with octreotide as antineoplastic therapy. This treatment was begun only after documentation of clear objective progression of disease., Methods: A Phase II trial was performed at a tertiary comprehensive cancer center., Results: The median survival for this patient population from the start of octreotide therapy has not been reached, with a median follow-up of 29 months (range, 1-47 months). No major objective tumor regressions were seen. Seventeen patients (50%) experienced a computed tomography-documented stabilization of disease that was maintainable for a minimum of 2 months (median, 5 months; range, 0-27 months). Of the 34 patients, 20 patients received octreotide as their first antineoplastic therapy. The median survival for these 20 patients has not been reached, with a median follow-up also of 29 months (range, 12-41 months)., Conclusions: Octreotide may influence the natural history of neuroendocrine tumors. The survival in patients treated with octreotide, as measured from the time of progression of disease, compares favorably with that of historical controls. Proof of a survival advantage for patients treated with octreotide would require a multicenter, randomized trial.

A prospective study was performed to determine the efficacy of octreotide (Sandostatin; SMS 201-995) 200 micrograms tid in controlling tumor growth. The study included 21 patients with metastasized endocrine GEP tumors: 6 gastrinomas, 8 carcinoid syndromes, 7 nonfunctioning tumors. Treatment was performed for 3 to 59 months (median 15 months). Evaluation of the response to octreotide was facilitated in 12 patients by a pretreatment observation period of 3 to 47 months (median 17 months) during which the natural growth behavior was determined. Based on the presence or absence of a control period prior to treatment, 5 patients were considered to be responders, 7 as questionable responders (no pretreatment phase available), and 9 as nonresponders. None of the 21 patients had documented shrinkage of the tumor mass. The most favorable response was tumor standstill. In all but one responder an escape to an initially favorable response occurred after 6 to 28 months (median 14 months). Proved inhibition of growth was paralleled by a reduction of serum and urine hormone parameters, whereas unaltered progression of tumor growth was observed also in the presence of hormone suppression. Tumor growth and hormone release was inhibited in the absence and presence of somatostatin receptors on the tumor. It is concluded that octreotide exerts a limited effect on metastatic GEP tumor growth. The evaluation of a response to octreotide is facilitated by an observation period prior to the drug that provides information on growth characteristics of the tumor. The presence of octreotide receptors does not predict the success of therapy.

Forty-five patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors were treated with a regimen of etoposide 130 mg/m2/d for 3 days plus cisplatin 45 mg/m2/d on days 2 and 3. Both drugs were given by continuous intravenous infusion. Among 27 patients with well-differentiated carcinoid tumors or islet cell carcinomas, only two partial objective tumor regressions were observed (7%). Among 18 patients prospectively classified as having anaplastic neuroendocrine carcinomas, however, there were nine partial regressions and three complete regressions, an overall regression rate of 67%. For anaplastic disease, the median duration of regression was 8 months (range to 21 months). Tumor response was unrelated to primary site, endocrine hyperfunction, or prior therapy experience. The median survival of all patients with anaplastic tumors was 19 months; this seemed favorable when considering the small experiences with these rare tumors reported in the literature. Toxicity, which was severe for most patients, consisted primarily of vomiting, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, alopecia, and neuropathy. The anaplastic neuroendocrine tumor is strongly responsive to therapy with combined etoposide and cisplatin. Patients with undifferentiated carcinomas, originating in typical neuroendocrine tumor sites (small and large bowel, pancreas, and stomach) or of unknown origin, who have consistent histologic findings by light microscopy should be evaluated for this possibility with appropriate immune staining or electron microscopy.

A phase II trial of chemotherapy in carcinoid and islet cell pancreatic tumours has been conducted with the FAP protocol: 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 per day (5-FU) for 3 days, 50 mg/m2 doxorubicin on day 2, and 90 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 2, repeated every 4 weeks. 24 patients, 20 non-pretreated and 4 pretreated, were included. For non-pretreated patients we observed 1 complete response and 2 partial responses. The response rate was 15% (95% confidence interval 0-31%). No response was observed in the pretreated patients. The toxicity was mainly digestive and haematological with 7 patients experiencing vomiting grade 3 and 3 patients with leucopenia grade 3. We conclude that the FAP protocol is of poor efficiency in endocrine tumours.

Somatostatin (SS) receptor status was investigated in the tumor tissues from 62 patients with carcinoid tumors and 15 patients with islet cell carcinomas using receptor autoradiography techniques with two different iodinated somatostatin analogues as radioligands, a [Leu8, DTrp22, Tyr25]somatostatin-28 and a somatostatin octapeptide, Tyr3-octreotide. The carcinoid tumors were either primaries (n = 32) or metastases (n = 43), sampled as surgical specimens or as small needle liver biopsies. Fifty-four of 62 carcinoid patients had SS receptor-positive tumors (87%). All 15 islet cell carcinoma patients had positive tumors (4 primaries, 11 metastases), i.e., 3 vipomas, 3 insulinomas, 2 glucagonomas, 1 gastrinoma, 2 polyfunctional tumors, and 4 nonfunctioning tumors. Saturation and competition experiments on tissue sections revealed saturable, high affinity binding sites pharmacologically specific for bioactive SS analogues. In a majority of the tumors, the receptors were densely distributed and were always homogeneously found in the whole tumor. All except two tumors were labeled with both radioligands. Multiple liver metastases (n = 16) from three different patients were all shown to contain a comparable amount of receptors. SS receptors could be demonstrated even in very small tissue samples of liver metastases obtained by percutaneous liver biopsies (mean weight, 6.8 mg). The majority of the eight SS receptor-negative carcinoids were mainly bronchial carcinoids (n = 5), usually poorly differentiated. On the contrary, SS receptor-positive cases were never found to be anaplastic. All tumors except one from patients pretreated with octreotide (3 days to 3.8 years) were SS receptor positive. In the majority of carcinoids or islet cell carcinomas, the SS receptor status correlated with the in vivo biochemical response (hormone inhibition) to octreotide. These data demonstrate (a) the high prevalence of SS receptors in the primary tumors of both carcinoids and islet cell carcinomas, (b) their presence in metastases as well, (c) their continuous expression even during long term octreotide therapy, (d) the possibility of measuring SS receptors in percutaneous needle liver biopsies, and (e) the evidence of their functionality. This study therefore suggests that tumoral SS receptors may be the likely molecular basis for octreotide action and may be an important parameter for predicting the therapeutic efficacy of SS analogues in carcinoids and islet cell carcinomas.

Thirty-three patients with advanced, metastatic APUD tumors (islet cell, carcinoid, or medullary carcinomas of the thyroid) were treated with etoposide as a single agent. Of 29 evaluable patients, four (14%) had partial responses (95% confidence limits, 1%-26%). Toxic effects seen were those previously reported for etoposide as a single agent. Etoposide has activity in APUD tumors; further studies with this agent are indicated.

The results of combination chemotherapy with intermittent courses of 5-fluorouracil and streptozotocin in ten patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors and in eight patients with islet cell carcinoma are reported. Objective responses occurred in two of ten and in two of seven evaluable patients respectively. Biochemical responses occurred in an additional two patients with carcinoid. No improvement over single-agent chemotherapy and no effects on survival were noted.

As streptozocin has a toxic effect on gastrin producing cells in some patients with gastrinomas, the action of the drug upon normal gastrin release was evaluated in patients with carcinoid tumours (n=6) and malignant insulinomas (n=2). No acute effects were recorded in 22 instances where gastrin levels were followed during the first 24 hours after infusion of streptozocin. When gastrin levels were compared throughout a course of repeated infusions during months a significant increase was noted. Concentrations were doubled after 6 g streptozocin given during a four months period, and tripled after 10 g in nine months period. One patients developed bleeding duodenal ulcer after a total dose of 6 g. It is concluded that streptozocin does not damage normal G cells, but by some action seems to stimulate gastrin relase. Peptic ulceration may be an important side effect during a long term treatment.

Malignant intra-abdominal neuroendocrine tumors are rare; consequently, a standard chemotherapeutic protocol for patients with unresectable disease has not been established. This prompted a review of our experience with dimethyltriazeno imidazole carboxamide (dacarbazine) (DTIC) treatment for these tumors. From 1976 to 1986, 14 patients were treated with DTIC for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. There were seven men and seven women whose ages ranged from 19 to 76 years. Diagnoses included eight nonfunctioning islet-cell carcinomas, three retroperitoneal neuroendocrine tumors, two glucagonomas, and one ileal carcinoid. Before DTIC chemotherapy, four patients were treated with streptozotocin and 5-FU, and one was treated with cytoxan and methotrexate without response. Two patients who were initially treated with DTIC with no response were subsequently treated with streptozotocin and 5-FU without benefit. Standard treatment with DTIC consisted of monthly cycles of 250 mg/m2/day administered intravenously for 5 days. Seven patients had an objective response to DTIC with both improvement in quality of life and a decrease of more than 50% in tumor size on computerized tomography (CT) or liver scanning. Response duration ranged from 1 to 10 years. One patient with a glucagonoma was treated for two years and had no evidence of disease at laparotomy 7 years later. Four patients with nonfunctioning islet cell carcinoma had a positive response to DTIC, but three of these patients had tumor recurrence 3 to 6 years after treatment. Two patients with retroperitoneal neuroendocrine tumors had a positive response to DTIC treatment. One patient with a glucagonoma and one with a nonfunctioning islet-cell tumor had equivocal responses with transient clinical improvement but no objective changes in tumor size. Five patients did not respond; two were given DTIC therapy as a last resort and died 1 and 12 days later. Of the other three patients, two died 6 months and one 2 years after treatment. DTIC chemotherapy was effective in 50% of patients with intra-abdominal neuroendocrine tumors. Although DTIC therapy was associated with nausea, no major gastrointestinal, hematologic, or renal complications were noted. This favorable experience with DTIC chemotherapy for nonresectable intra-abdominal neuroendocrine tumors indicates that further clinical evaluation and use are warranted.