Search

Mechanisms of soil organic carbon (SOC) stabilization have been widely studied due to their relevance in the global carbon cycle. No‐till (NT) has been frequently adopted to sequester SOC; however, limited information is available regarding whether sequestered SOC will be stabilized for long term. Thus, we reviewed the mechanisms affecting SOC stability in NT systems, including the priming effects (PE), molecular structure of SOC, aggregate protection, association with soil minerals, microbial properties, and environmental effects. Although a more steady‐state molecular structure of SOC is observed in NT compared with conventional tillage (CT), SOC stability may depend more on physical and chemical protection. On average, NT improves macro‐aggregation by 32.7%, and lowers SOC mineralization in macro‐aggregates compared with CT. Chemical protection is also important due to the direct adsorption of organic molecules and the enhancement of aggregation by soil minerals. Higher microbial activity in NT could also produce binding agents to promote aggregation and the formation of metal‐oxidant organic complexes. Thus, microbial residues could be stabilized in soils over the long term through their attachment to mineral surfaces and entrapment of aggregates under NT. On average, NT reduces SOC mineralization by 18.8% and PE intensities after fresh carbon inputs by 21.0% compared with CT (p <.05). Although higher temperature sensitivity (Q10) is observed in NT due to greater Q10 in macro‐aggregates, an increase of soil moisture regime in NT could potentially constrain the improvement of Q10. This review improves process‐based understanding of the physical and chemical mechanism of protection that can act, independently or interactively, to enhance SOC preservation. It is concluded that SOC sequestered in NT systems is likely to be stabilized over the long term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the context of climate change, soil is a major pool of stable carbon on earth, yet knowledge on soil carbon turnover is limited. The difference in 13C/12C content observed between C3 and C4 plant crops has been widely used to distinguish the sources of soil organic carbon under continuous monoculture, but not in C3–C4 rotations. We studied the stability of the δ13CSOC content and the effect of no tillage, conventional tillage, and rotary tillage in 4 soils sampled at 0–5, 5–10, and 10–20 cm depth, in 2018–2019 in a field with long-term history of wheat (C3) and maize (C4) rotations. We also analyzed the results from the literature. The results show that the δ13CSOC is not statistically affected by the sampling date, thus allowing to use this method to distinguish C3 and C4 plant contributions in rotations. Moreover, no-tillage favored the preservation of wheat carbon, and this preservation was accentuated at 10–20 cm depth. δ13CSOC is also affected by fertilization and irrigation. The literature confirmed that wheat-derived carbon is better preserved that maize-derived carbon, on the average. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: 14th Line, "The variation between C3 (~ 27%) and C4 (~ 13%)"; Page no: 2, 1st line "ranging from - 23 - - 40% ... from - 9 to - 19%". 2nd page under title: Materials and methods (Soil sample and analysis): 15th line " SP 13 sp C3 and SP 13 sp C4 are - 27% and - 13%". [Extracted from the article]