Search

Ni-supported SBA-15 catalysts were prepared by physical mixing of Ni(NO3)2·6H2O and SBA-15 (Ni/SBA-15-M) and in the presence of citric acid as the complexing agent (Ni/SBA-15-M-C). Moreover, an Ni-supported SBA-15 catalyst was also prepared by the conventional incipient impregnation method (Ni/SBA-15-I). All the catalysts were systematically evaluated for carbon dioxide reforming of methane (CDR) at CO2/CH4 = 1.0, gas hourly space velocity of 60,000 mL·g−1·h−1, and reaction temperature of 700 °C. The characterization results show that the Ni particle size of Ni/SBA-15-M-C is significantly smaller than that of Ni/SBA-15-M due to the coordination effect of citric acid and Ni2+. Consequently, the Ni/SBA-15-M-C exhibits superior anti-coking and anti-sintering during the CDR-operated period because of the higher Ni dispersion and stronger Ni–support interaction. Compared to the Ni/SBA-15-I, the physical mixing of nickel salt and mesoporous material for preparing of Ni-based catalyst is easy to operate, although the crystal size and catalytic performance of Ni/SBA-15-C are very similar to that of Ni/SBA-15-M-I. Thus, the efficient and easily controlled catalyst structure makes the physical mixing strategy very promising for preparing highly active and stable CDR catalysts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reforming methane to produce syngas is a subject that generates considerable interest. The process requires catalysts that possess high-performance active sites to activate stable C–H bonds. Herein, we report a facile synthetic strategy to prepare Ni-based catalysts by complexation–impregnation (Ni-G/SiO2-C) and precipitation–impregnation (Ni-G/SiO2-P) methods using glycine as a complexing agent. The particle size of Ni in both types of catalysts is decreased by adding glycine in the preparation process. Nevertheless, the preparation methods and amount of glycine play a significant role in the particle size and distribution of Ni over the Ni-based catalysts. The smaller particle size and narrower distribution of Ni were obtained in the Ni-G/SiO2-P catalyst. The catalysts were comparatively tested for carbon-dioxide reforming of methane (CDR). Ni-G/SiO2-P showed better CDR performance than Ni-G/SiO2-C and Ni/SiO2 and increased stability because of the smaller particle size and narrower distribution of Ni. Moreover, a high-performance Ni-based catalyst was prepared by optimizing the amount of glycine added. An unobservable deactivation was obtained over Ni-G-2/SiO2-P and Ni-G-3/SiO2-P for CDR during TOS = 20 h. Thus, a new promising method is described for the preparation of Ni-based catalysts for CDR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ni-C/SiO2 and Ni-G/SiO2 catalysts were prepared by a complexed-impregnation method using citric acid and glycine as complexing agents, respectively. Ni/SiO2 was also prepared by the conventional incipient impregnation method. All the catalysts were comparatively tested for carbon dioxide reforming of methane (CDR) at P = 1.0 atm, T = 750 °C, CO2/CH4 = 1.0, and GHSV = 60,000 mL·g−1·h−1. The results showed that Ni-C/SiO2 and Ni-G/SiO2 exhibited better CDR performance, especially regarding stability, than Ni/SiO2. The conversions of CH4 and CO2 were kept constant above 82% and 87% after 20 h of reaction over Ni-C/SiO2 and Ni-G/SiO2 while they were decreased from 81% and 88% to 56% and 59%, respectively, over the Ni/SiO2. The characterization results of the catalysts before and after the reaction showed that the particle size and the distribution of Ni, as well as the interactions between Ni and the support were significantly influenced by the preparation method. As a result, an excellent resistance to the coking deposition and the anti-sintering of Ni was obtained over the Ni-C/SiO2 and Ni-G/SiO2, leading to a highly active and stable CDR performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]