1. Systematic Approach to Selecting and Preparing a Medical Power of Attorney in the Gynecologic Oncology Center.
- Author
-
Zhukovsky, Donna S., Soliman, Pamela T., Mathew, Boby, Mills, Sarah, Bodurka, Diane, Frumovitz, Michael, Meyer, Larissa A., Westin, Shannon, Nowitz, Marisa, Archie, LaShan, Fenton, Shauna, Lang, Kai, Williams, Janet L., Boving, Valentine, and Bruera, Eduardo
- Subjects
- *
CANCER patient medical care , *CANCER treatment , *FEMALE reproductive organ tumors , *OUTPATIENT services in hospitals , *MEDICAL appointments , *MEDICAL records , *METASTASIS , *POWER of attorney , *SOCIAL case work , *PATIENT participation , *DECISION making in clinical medicine , *ADVANCE directives (Medical care) , *GYNECOLOGIC care , *SPECIALTY hospitals , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *PATIENT selection , *ELECTRONIC health records , *ACQUISITION of data methodology - Abstract
PURPOSE: Advance care planning (ACP) supports national priorities of patient engagement, person-centered care, and safety. A systematic approach is uncommon in most care settings. Our institution offers all patients with cancer new to the institution an opportunity to select and prepare a medical decision maker (MDM) after social work counseling. The goals of this study were to determine the success of a systematic institutional process for selecting a prepared MDM. The primary objectives were that (1) 70% or more of new patients would have one or more documented social work ACP discussions by the third office visit within 4 months, and (2) there would be a two-fold increase in scanned medical power of attorney (MPOA) documents available in the electronic health record (EHR). The secondary objectives were (1) improved surrogate preparedness for medical decision making, and (2) to determine whether patients with metastatic disease demonstrated greater readiness for selection of an MDM than those with localized disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive gynecology oncology outpatients. RESULTS: Of 133 patients, 93 (70%) had metastatic disease. The median number of visits was two (one to three). Forty-seven patients (39.3%) met with social work by visit 3. Review of ACP notes suggested that most patients were in the early stages of selecting a prepared MDM. At visit 1, 39 (29.3%) reported having an advance directive document; 14 (10.5%) had an MPOA in the EHR. There was no increase by visit 3. Fewer patients with metastatic disease than those with localized cancer (32.3% v 67.5%; P =.001) had three visits; no other parameter, including presence of MPOA documents in the EHR, achieved statistical significance between groups. CONCLUSION: Current processes fail to engage patients in selecting and preparing an MDM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF