1. Genetic Testing in a Population-Based Sample of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors from the REACH Randomized Trial: Cost Barriers and Moderators of Counseling Mode.
- Author
-
Steffen LE, Du R, Gammon A, Mandelblatt JS, Kohlmann WK, Lee JH, Buys SS, Stroup AM, Campo RA, Flores KG, Vicuña B, Schwartz MD, and Kinney AY
- Subjects
- BRCA1 Protein genetics, BRCA2 Protein genetics, Breast Neoplasms economics, Breast Neoplasms genetics, Female, Genetic Counseling economics, Genetic Counseling methods, Genetic Testing economics, Health Expenditures statistics & numerical data, Humans, Insurance, Health economics, Insurance, Health statistics & numerical data, Middle Aged, Mutation, Ovarian Neoplasms economics, Ovarian Neoplasms genetics, Patient-Centered Care economics, Patient-Centered Care methods, Patient-Centered Care statistics & numerical data, Telephone, Breast Neoplasms diagnosis, Cancer Survivors statistics & numerical data, Genetic Counseling statistics & numerical data, Genetic Testing statistics & numerical data, Ovarian Neoplasms diagnosis
- Abstract
Background: This study evaluates predictors of BRCA1/ 2 testing among breast and ovarian cancer survivors who received genetic counseling as part of a randomized trial and evaluates moderators of counseling mode on testing uptake. Methods: Predictors of BRCA1/2 testing within one year postcounseling were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression in a population-based sample of breast and ovarian cancer survivors at increased hereditary risk randomly assigned to in-person counseling (IPC; n = 379) versus telephone counseling (TC; n = 402). Variables that moderated the association between counseling mode and testing were identified by subgroup analysis. Results: Testing uptake was associated with higher perceived comparative mutation risk [OR = 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11-1.57] in the adjusted analysis. Those without cost barriers had higher testing uptake (OR = 18.73; 95% CI, 7.09-49.46). Psychologic distress and perceived comparative mutation risk moderated the effect of counseling and testing. Uptake between IPC versus TC did not differ at low levels of distress and risk, but differed at high distress (26.3% TC vs. 44.3% IPC) and high perceived comparative risk (33.9% TC vs. 50.5% IPC). Conclusions: Cost concerns are a strong determinant of testing. Differences in testing uptake by counseling mode may depend on precounseling distress and risk perceptions. Impact: Cost concerns may contribute to low testing in population-based samples of at-risk cancer survivors. Precounseling psychosocial characteristics should be considered when offering in-person versus telephone counseling. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(12); 1772-80. ©2017 AACR ., (©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF