Search

The National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Derived Models Repository (NCI PDMR; https://pdmr.cancer.gov) has developed a national repository of Patient-Derived Models (PDMs) comprised of patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), in vitro patient-derived tumor cell cultures (PDCs) and cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) as well as patient-derived organoids (PDOrg). These PDMs are clinically annotated with molecular information available in an easily accessible database for the extramural community. A key effort in developing these models is to develop matched models sets allowing for larger scale screening efforts using 2D or 3D models to prioritize selection of PDX models for preclinical translational research. To date, over 220 model sets with a PDX, PDOrg, and PDC from a single patient have been developed; 40 of these have matched CAF models allowing for exploration of research questions focused on tumor microenvironment. The largest model sets are in colorectal cancer (COADREAD, n=76), gynecologic cancers (n=33), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD, n=29), melanoma (MEL, n=19), and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC, n=17). Every model undergoes several quality control assessments that serve as go/no-go criteria including pathology assessment, STR validation, NGS concordance assessment and for PDXs, human:mouse DNA content assessment. It should be noted that not every model is successful in the development or QC phase so additional model sets with only one or two of the model types are also available for researcher requests, for example there are over 125 PDX/PDOrg matched model sets. The NCI is currently performing parallel preclinical screening of PDXs and PDCs or PDOrgs to determine the ability of the in vitro lines to predict in vivo activity. Genetic and histopathologic assessment of these matched model sets have demonstrated a high degree of stability by somatic mutation, copy number alteration (CNA) and gene expression data. Gene expression correlation analysis shows that mean of Spearman r between PDXs 0.89, between matched PDC/PDXs 0.79, and between matched PDOrg/PDXs 0.82. As expected, some variation at the gene expression level when comparing PDX to in vitro cultures by t-SNE can be observed, likely due to the differences in culture conditions. Funded by NCI Contract No. HHSN261200800001E Citation Format: Yvonne A. Evrard, Li Chen, Sergio Alcoser, Gareth Bliss, Carrie Bonomi, Suzanne Borgel, John Carter, Ting-Chia Chang, Alice Chen, Kevin Cooper, Biswajit Das, Kelly Dougherty, Lindsay Dutko, Marion Gibson, Michelle M. Ahalt-Gottholm, Tara Grinnage-Pulley, Keegan Kalmbach, Chris Karlovich, Kimberly Klarmann, Shahanawaz Jiwani, Tiffanie Miner, Michael Mullendore, Matthew Murphy, Kevin Plater, Gloryvee Rivera, Jessica Steed, Luke Stockwin, Cindy R. Timme, Dianne L. Newton, Paul Mickey Williams, Melinda G. Hollingshead, James H. Doroshow. NCI patient derived models repository: PDX, organoid and cell lines from the same patient - bridging the translational pipeline [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 40.

Background: A PDX bladder cancer model, BL0293-F563, spontaneously metastasizes to the liver and bone, and sheds high numbers of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). This PDX model provides a unique opportunity to explore the relationships between primary tumors, CTCs, and metastases. Methods: BL0293-F563 tumors (available from the NCI Patient-Derived Models Repository [https://pdmr.cancer.gov/] and originally developed by Jackson Laboratories) were implanted into NSG mice, and primary tumors, metastatic nodules in the liver, and blood were collected at maximal allowable tumor burden. Tumor tissue was dissociated using Miltenyi Tumor Dissociation Kit with OctoDissociator, and Human CTCs were enriched from mouse blood through negative selection with anti-mouse CD45 and anti-mouse MHC-1 magnetic beads. Single cell sequencing was done using 10X Genomics 3’ gene expression assay v3.1. Data processing and analysis was done using 10X Genomics’ Cell Ranger pipeline, Seurat, and cNMF. Results: single cell RNAseq data from primary tumors, CTCs, and metastases from 9 mice were aggregated into a single dataset, and cells were classified into 17 clusters using Seurat FindNeighbors. All clusters contained cells from multiple sites (primary tumor, CTCs, metastases), but three clusters were enriched in CTCs and one cluster was composed of mostly primary tumor cells. All clusters exhibited epithelial-like gene expression signature scores, suggesting that CTC shedding was occurring without prominent epithelial-mesenchymal transition. CTC-enriched clusters showed elevated expression of RHO pathway genes, implicating ameboid-like migration in CTC shedding in this PDX model. Consistent with expected differences in oxygenation states, CTC-enriched clusters exhibited a lower hypoxia gene expression score than primary tumor and metastasis-enriched clusters. CTC-enriched clusters also showed higher expression of oxidative phosphorylation genes, suggesting metabolic differences between CTCs and cells from other sites. Additionally, two of three CTC-enriched clusters had elevated expression of mitosis-associated genes, indicating that at least some subpopulations of CTCs are actively cycling. A metastasis suppressor gene KISS1 was expressed in a subset of primary tumor cells but undetectable in CTCs, suggesting that KISS1 expression loss occurs before CTC shedding. Conclusions: Utilizing single cell gene expression profiling, we have linked the gene expression profile of CTCs to specific cell subpopulations in primary tumors and metastases. We show that CTC-enriched cell clusters appear to maintain an epithelial phenotype. Subpopulations of CTC cells exhibit enrichment of motility-associated transcripts and features of active cell cycling. Our results implicate a known metastasis suppressor gene KISS1 in CTC shedding and metastatic dissemination in this PDX model. Citation Format: Tomas Vilimas, Brandie Fullmer, Alyssa Chapman, Rini Pauly, Ting-Chia Chang, Li Chen, Biswajit Das, Chris Karlovich, Yvonne Evrard, Melinda Hollingshead, Howard Stotler, Michelle Ahalt-Gottholm, Tara Grinnage-Pulley, Mickey Williams, James H. Doroshow. Comparative single cell transcriptome profiling of primary tumors, CTCs and metastatic sites from a bladder cancer PDX model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 973.

Background: A PDX bladder cancer model, BL0293-F563, grows large subcutaneous tumors, spontaneously metastasizes to the liver and bone, and sheds high numbers of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). This PDX model provides a unique opportunity to explore the relationships between primary tumors, CTCs and metastatic cell subpopulations. Methods: BL0293-F563 tumors (available from the NCI Patient-Derived Models Repository [https://pdmr.cancer.gov/] and originally developed by Jackson Laboratories) were implanted into NSG mice and and primary tumors, metastatic nodules in the liver, and blood were collected at maximal allowable tumor burden. Tumor tissue was dissociated using Miltenyi Tumor Dissociation Kit with OctoDissociator, and Human CTCs were enriched from whole mouse blood through negative selection with anti-mouse CD45 and anti-mouse MHC-1 magnetic beads. Single cell sequencing was done using 10X Genomics 3’ gene expression assay v3.1. Sequencing libraries were prepared using 10X Genomics Chromium and 3’ gene expression kit v3.1. Data processing and analysis was done using 10X Genomics’ Cell Ranger pipeline, Seurat, and consensus non-negative matrix factorization. Results: Using Seurat FindNeighbors, cells in the aggregated dataset were classified into 17 distinct clusters. All clusters were comprised of cells from multiple sites (primary tumor, CTCs, metastases), but three clusters were enriched in CTCs and one cluster was composed of mostly primary tumor cells. All clusters exhibited an epithelial-like gene expression signature score, suggesting that CTC shedding was occurring without prominent epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Consistent with expected differences in oxygenation states, CTC-enriched clusters exhibited a lower hypoxia gene expression score than primary tumor and metastasis-enriched clusters. CTC-enriched clusters also showed higher expression of oxidative phosphorylation genes, suggesting metabolic differences between CTCs and cells from primary tumors and metastases. Based on Human Primary Cell Atlas phenotype prediction, several clusters were associated with stem cell like phenotypes. Additionally, two of three CTC-enriched clusters had elevated expression of mitosis-associated genes, suggesting that at least some populations of CTCs are not quiescent but actively cycling. Conclusions: Utilizing single cell gene expression profiling, we have linked the gene expression profile of CTCs to specific cell subpopulations in primary tumors and metastases. We show that CTC-enriched cell clusters appear to maintain an epithelial phenotype. Subpopulations of CTC cells exhibited enrichment of stemness-associated transcripts and features of active cell cycling. Citation Format: Tomas Vilimas, Brandie Fullmer, Alyssa Chapman, Li Chen, Ting-Chia Chang, Rini Pauly, Biswajit Das, Chris Karlovich, Yvonne A. Evrard, Howard Stotler, Michelle M. Gottholm-Ahalt, Tara Grinnage-Pulley, Melinda G. Hollingshead, James H. Doroshow, P. Mickey Williams. Comparative single cell transcriptome profiling of primary tumors, CTCs and metastatic sites from a bladder cancer PDX model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P097.

Background: Acquired Uniparental Disomy (aUPD) is relatively common in cancer. Occurrence of aUPD is more frequent in some tumor histologies (e.g., serous ovarian, colorectal) and may be relevant for choice of therapy. The Patient-Derived Models Repository (PDMR; https://pdmr.cancer.gov) developed by The National Cancer Institute (NCI) includes patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models from multiple tumor histologies with different passages and lineages. The associated clinical annotation and genomic data make it possible to assess the prevalence of aUPD in the PDMR cohort and the stability of aUPD in different passages and lineages within a PDX model. Methods: High tumor purity in the PDX specimens (after removal of mouse reads representing the stroma) enabled highly accurate assessment of loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Variants called by GATK Haplotype caller from whole exome sequencing (WES) data were used to identify segments of homozygosity using BCFtools/RoH (runs of homozygosity). The RoH segments were then intersected with the bed file for chromosome arms to get %LOH at the arm level. If %LOH on a chromosome arm was >90%, we considered the sample to have aUPD at the arm level. WES was also used to look for associations between DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway alterations and aUPD. Results: We made the following observations: a) aUPD was observed most frequently in chr18q (75/427, 17.6%) and chr3p (69/427, 16%) of PDX models; b) aUPD was observed more frequently in certain tumor histologies, e.g., clear cell renal cell carcinoma (6/8), small cell lung cancer (3/4) and non-small cell lung cancer (25/38); c) extensive aUPD was observed in 4 PDMR models (>50% of evaluated chromosome arms in these models have aUPD); d) aUPD was not observed in some tumor histologies, i.e., synovial sarcoma, uterine endometrioid carcinoma; e) in the vast majority of PDMR models (>90%), aUPD is maintained faithfully across lineages and through multiple passaging; f) subclonal aUPD events were observed in some models across different lineages; g) significant enrichment of double strand DNA break repair (DSBR) pathway alterations was observed in PDMR models without aUPD (p=0.0007, Fisher's exact test) suggesting defects in DSBR are not associated with aUPD; and h) aUPD was rarely observed in MSI-high models (1/30) suggesting mutual exclusivity of mismatch repair (MMR) pathway defects and aUPD. Conclusion: We observed a relatively high frequency of UPD in the PDMR models (at least 1 arm of a chromosome). UPD was more frequently observed in specific chromosomal arms. The frequency of aUPD was higher in some tumor histologies and absent in others. aUPD was stably maintained across passages and lineages, although some heterogeneity was observed. Our data suggest aUPD is not associated with defects in DSBR and MMR pathways. Preclinical drug studies using NCI PDMR models may suggest appropriate therapeutic options for cancers with aUPD. Citation Format: Rajesh Patidar, Li Chen, Chris A. Karlovich, Biswajit Das, Yvonne A. Evrard, Tomas Vilimas, Justine N. McCutcheon, Amanda L. Peach, Nikitha V. Nair, Thomas D. Forbes, Brandie A. Fullmer, Anna J. Lee Fong, Luis E. Romero, Alyssa K. Chapman, Kelsey A. Conley, Robin D. Harrington, Shahanawaz S. Jiwani, Peng Wang, Michelle M. Gottholm Ahalt, Erin N. Cantu, Gloryvee Rivera, Lindsay M. Dutko, Kelly M. Benauer, Vishnuprabha R. Kannan, Suzanne D. Borgel, John P. Carter, Jesse M. Stottlemyer, Tiffanie L. Miner, Devynn R. Breen, Emily T. Delaney, Chelsea A. McGlynn, Candace N. Mallow, Marianne Radzyminski, Shannon N. Uzelac, Sergio Y. Alcoser, Tara L. Grinnage-Pulley, Michelle A. Eugeni, Dianne L. Newton, Melinda G. Hollingshead, Paul M. Williams, James H. Doroshow. Genomic landscape of acquired uniparental disomy in NCI PDMR patient derived xenograft models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3554.

Cancer organoids are heterogeneous 3D cellular clusters with complexities that mimic some characteristics of tumors in situ. Thus, assays performed with cancer organoids might enable better predictions of in vivo drug responses than those performed with cell monolayers. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) is developing a national repository of Patient-Derived (PD) models comprised of clinically annotated and molecularly characterized PD xenografts (PDXs), PD tumor cell lines (PDCs), and PD cancer organoids (PDOrgs) (https://pdmr.cancer.gov/). We evaluated the therapeutic activity of a panel of FDA-approved and investigational anticancer agents, including carboplatin, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, SN38, 5-FU, adavosertib, erlotinib, trametinib, and vemurafenib, against a cohort of PDCs, PDOrgs, and PDXs from solid tumors including colon, gastroesophageal, head and neck, NSCLC, pancreatic, bladder, and uterine cancers. Our goal was to investigate whether drug sensitivities determined using PDCs and PDOrgs correlate with responses observed in the matching PDXs. Cultures were exposed to anticancer agents at concentrations ranging from 1 pM to 100 µM for periods of 4 or 6 days. The data indicated that the GI50 values for PDOrgs were in overall agreement with in vivo PDX drug responses measured as relative median to event free survival (RMEFS), where an event is the median time (days) from treatment initiation to tumor volume quadrupling, calculated as median time to tumor volume quadrupling for treated animals/median time to tumor volume quadrupling for control animals. For both paclitaxel and trametinib, responses in PDOrgs, from most sensitive to most resistant, were similar to the corresponding PDXs. Drug sensitivities determined in PDC monolayers were less clearly related to in vivo PDX responses; particularly for PDCs treated with carboplatin, gemcitabine, and SN-38. This work is part of a larger effort to provide a rigorous comparison between fully characterized and annotated PDCs-PDOrgs-PDXs to assess the value of different in vitro model systems for the prediction of PDX drug responses. This research was supported [in part] by the Developmental Therapeutics Program in the Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis of the National Cancer Institute. Funded by NCI Contract No. HHSN261200800001E. Citation Format: Petreena Campbell, Curtis Hose, Lara El Touny, Erik Harris, John Connelly, Carrie Bonomi, Kelly Dougherty, Savanna Styers, Abigail Walke, Jenna Moyer, Mariah Baldwin, Anna Wade, Michael Mullendore, Kaitlyn Arthur, Matthew Murphy, Kevin Plater, Marion Gibson, Joseph Geraghty, Michelle Gottholm-Ahalt, Tara Grinnage-Pulley, Tiffanie Chase, John Carter, Howard Stotler, Debbie Trail, Luke Stockwin, Dianne Newton, Yvonne Evrard, Melinda Hollingshead, Ralph E. Parchment, Nathan P. Coussens, Beverly A. Teicher, James H. Doroshow, Annamaria Rapisarda. Evaluation of patient-derived cell lines and cancer organoids for the prediction of drug responses in patient-derived xenograft models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3913.

The National Cancer Institute's Patient-Derived Models Repository (NCI PDMR; https://pdmr.cancer.gov) is performing a large-scale multi-year preclinical study with 39 PDX models of rare cancers (mesothelioma, MPNST, osteosarcoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, etc) treated with 56 novel therapeutic combinations in an exploratory, n-of-4 arm, study design. Combinations that show promising responses (e.g., regression or durable inhibition of tumor growth) will be repeated along with the single agent arms to determine if the response is driven by the combination or only one of the agents. In order to do this in a timely fashion, relatively speaking, the PDX tumors are serially passaged and each passage is treated with a set of 8 combinations plus relevant vehicle control(s) while in parallel enough PDXs are retained to be expanded for the next passage and drug set. Every serial passage undergoes several quality control assessments that serve as go/no-go criteria including pathology assessment, human:mouse DNA content assessment, and low pass whole genome sequencing to determine the average fraction of genome changed compared to the original donor material. If there is a QC failure, the PDX model is restarted from early passage cryo-material (passage 1-2). An additional quality control effort is to bookend the combination studies with the first set of agents to see if tumor response is similar across passages. To date, most of the models have demonstrated a high degree of stability, though a couple of models have moved toward murine content and have been restarted from early passage material so all drug combinations can be tested. DNA and RNA are retained from all passages so a full NGS evaluation can be performed at a later date. This effort has been ongoing for over a year and the first bookend studies are beginning to be tested to determine if response at first and last passage of the study are consistent with each other, given the constraints of the inherent heterogeneity of the models themselves. Single agent studies of drug combinations that demonstrated a response in 30%-50% of the models tested are also underway to determine which combinations have a more than additive effect compared to the single agents. Promising combinations will be moved forward to early phase clinical trials for these rare cancers. Funded by NCI Contract No. HHSN261200800001E Citation Format: Yvonne A. Evrard, Biswajit Das, Sergio Y. Alcoser, Suzanne Borgel, Devynn Breen, John Carter, Tiffanie Chase, Alice Chen, Lily Chen, Kristen Cooley, Emily Delaney, Raymond Divelbiss, Lyndsay Dutko, Thomas Forbes, Kyle Georgius, Michelle Gottholm-Ahalt, Tara Grinnage-Pulley, Sierra Hoffman, Chris Karlovich, Shahanawaz Jiwani, Justine Mills, Malorie Morris, Michael Mullendore, Dianne Newton, Rajesh Patidar, Gloryvee Rivera, Howard Stotler, Jesse Stottlemyer, Savanna Styers, Debbie Trail, Shannon Uzelac, Thomas Vilimas, Abigail Walke, Thomas Walsh, Nicole Walters, Peng Wang, P. Mickey Williams, Melinda Hollingshead, James H. Doroshow. Quality control efforts in a large-scale, preclinical trial of rare cancer PDXs by the National Cancer Institute's patient-derived models repository (NCI PDMR) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5056.

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has developed a Patient-Derived Models Repository (PDMR) comprised of quality-controlled, early-passage, clinically-annotated patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs), in vitro tumor cell cultures (PDCs), cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and patient-derived organoids (PDOrg). NCI has focused on generating models to complement existing PDX collections and address unmet needs in the preclinical model space. These models are offered to the extramural community for research use (https://pdmr.cancer.gov), along with clinical annotation and molecular information (whole exome sequence, gene expression using RNASeq), via a publicly accessible database. Currently, over 200 PDX models, 50 PDC models, and 100 CAF models are available for distribution to the US research community. Approximately 50 PDOrg models will be released in early 2019. As part of its rare cancer initiative, the NCI is also targeting the collection of infrequently-observed tumor histologies to advance both biological investigations and drug development efforts for under-studied malignancies. Comparison of matched models, models where more than one model type are available (e.g., PDX and PDC), demonstrate a high degree of concordance across the model types. Genetic stability across the models is assessed using multiple criteria including genetic assessment of CNVs and presence of driver mutations. Optimal CNV assessment uses whole exome sequence data corrected for cellularity in the patient specimen using germline reads and corrected for cellularity in the PDX specimens by subtraction of the mouse reads. Histomorphologic comparison of PDXs and cell line xenografts (CLX) generated from in vitro PDCs and PDOrgs also overall show a high degree of concordance, though loss of features and dedifferentiation can be observed in some models. Overall these models demonstrate a high degree of conservation at the genetic and pathologic level when compared to the patient tumor. These models can provide researchers the ability to perform high- or mid-throughput screening in 2D or 3D culture followed by targeted selection of PDX models for in vivo studies. Funded by NCI Contract No. HHSN261200800001E Citation Format: Yvonne A. Evrard, Dianne Newton, Biswajit Das, Sergio Y. Alcoser, Kaitlyn Arthur, Mariah Baldwin, Carrie Bonomi, Suzanne Borgel, John Carter, Tiffany Chase, Alice Chen, Lily Chen, Nikki E. Craig, Vivekananda Datta, Emily Delaney, Raymond Divelbiss, Kelly Dougherty, Thomas Forbes, Kyle Georgius, Joe Geraghty, Marion Gibson, Michelle M. Gottholm-Ahalt, Tara Grinnage-Pulley, Kelly Hedger, Sierra Hoffman, Chris Karlovich, Wiem Lassoued, Shahanawaz Jiwani, Candace Mallow, Chelsea McGlynn, Mallorie Morris, Jenna Moyer, Mike Mullendore, Matt Murphy, Rajesh Patidar, Kevin Plater, Marianne Radzyminski, Nicki Scott, Luke H. Stockwin, Howard Stotler, Jesse Stottlemyer, Savanna Styers, Debbie Trail, Tomas Vilimas, Anna Wade, Abigail Walke, Thomas Walsh, P. Mickey Williams, Melinda G. Hollingshead, James H. Doroshow. Comparison of PDX, PDC, and PDOrg models from the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Derived Models Repository (PDMR) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4524.

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has developed a Patient-Derived Models Repository (PDMR) comprised of quality-controlled, early-passage, clinically-annotated patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to serve as a resource for public-private partnerships and academic drug discovery efforts. These models are offered to the extramural community for research use (https://pdmr.cancer.gov/), along with clinical annotation and molecular information (whole exome sequence, RNASeq), which is available in a publicly accessible database. The PDMR was established by NCI at the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNLCR) in direct response to discussions with academia and industry; the oncology community's highest priority need was preclinical models that more faithfully reflect the patient's tumor and are associated with the patient's treatment history. NCI has focused on generating models to complement existing PDX collections and address unmet needs in the preclinical model space. The PDMR generates the majority of its PDXs by subcutaneous implantation except for those histologies having better success rates in either orthotopic or alternate implant sites. All SOPs and quality-control standards developed by the PDMR as well as those shared by collaborators are posted to a public web site that houses the PDMR database. In May 2017, the public website (https://pdmr.cancer.gov/) went live with its first 100 models from histologies including pancreatic, colorectal, renal, head and neck, and lung squamous cell cancers as well as melanoma and adult soft tissue sarcomas. In early 2018, the PDMR will begin releasing models from gynecological cancers, small cell lung cancer, chondro/osteo sarcomas, lung adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell skin and Merkel cell carcinomas. In addition, wherever available germline sequence and somatic variant calls will be added to the existing molecular characterization data for each model. NCI has also increased its focus on creating PDXs from racial and ethnic minorities through several funding opportunities. The overall goal of NCI is to create a long-term home for at least 1000 models such that sufficient biological and clinical diversity is represented to allow researchers to ask questions regarding the impact of tumor heterogeneity on target qualification or clinical response, whether PDXs more faithfully represent the human tumor for pharmacodynamic assay and predictive marker development, or if adequately powered preclinical PDX clinical trials can lead to better evaluation of therapies for future clinical use. Moving forward the PDMR plans to distribute in vitro, early-passage tumor cell cultures and cancer-associated fibroblasts as well as releasing PDX drug response data for a panel of FNA-approved therapeutic agents. Funded by NCI Contract No. HHSN261200800001E Citation Format: Yvonne A. Evrard, Michelle M. Gottholm Ahalt, Sergio . Y. Alcoser, Kaitlyn Arthur, Mariah Baldwin, Linda L. Blumenauer, Carrie Bonomi, Suzanne Borgel, Elizabeth Bradtke, Corinne Camalier, John Carter, Tiffanie Chase, Alice Chen, Lily Chen, Donna W. Coakley, Nicole E. Craig, Biswajit Das, Vivekananda Datta, Jordyn Davidson, Margaret R. DeFreytas, Emily Delaney, Michelle A. Eugeni, Raymond Divelbiss, Palmer Fliss, Thomas Forbes, Marion Gibson, Tara Grinnage-Pulley, Sierra Hoffman, Lilia Ileva, Paula Jacobs, Franklyn Jimenez, Joseph Kalen, Catherine Karangwa, Chris Karlovich, Candace Mallow, Chelsea McGlynn, Jenna E. Moyer, Michael Mullendore, Dianne L. Newton, Nimit Patel, Rajesh Patidar, Kevin Plater, Marianne Radzyminski, Lisa Riffle, Larry Rubinstein, Luke H. Stockwin, Mickey Williams, Melinda G. Hollingshead, James H. Doroshow. The National Cancer Institute's patient-derived models repository (PDMR) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 986.

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has developed a Patient-Derived Models Repository (PDMR) comprised of quality-controlled, early-passage, clinically-annotated patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to serve as a resource for public-private partnerships and academic drug discovery efforts. These models are offered to the extramural community for research use (https://pdmr.cancer.gov/), along with clinical annotation and molecular information (whole exome sequence, RNASeq), which is available in a publicly accessible database. The PDMR was established by NCI at the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNLCR) in direct response to discussions with academia and industry; the oncology community9s highest priority need was preclinical models that more faithfully reflect the patient9s tumor and are associated with the patient9s treatment history. NCI has focused on generating models to complement existing PDX collections and address unmet needs in the preclinical model space. The PDMR generates the majority of its PDXs by subcutaneous implantation except for those histologies having better success rates in either orthotopic or alternate implant sites. All SOPs and quality-control standards developed by the PDMR as well as those shared by collaborators are posted to a public web site that houses the PDMR database. In May 2017, the public website (https://pdmr.cancer.gov/) went live with its first 100 models from histologies including pancreatic, colorectal, renal, head and neck, and lung squamous cell cancers as well as melanoma and adult soft tissue sarcomas. In early 2018, the PDMR will begin releasing models from gynecological cancers, small cell lung cancer, chondro/osteo sarcomas, lung adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell skin and Merkel cell carcinomas. In addition, wherever available germline sequence and somatic variant calls will be added to the existing molecular characterization data for each model. NCI has also increased its focus on creating PDXs from racial and ethnic minorities through several funding opportunities. The overall goal of NCI is to create a long-term home for at least 1000 models such that sufficient biological and clinical diversity is represented to allow researchers to ask questions regarding the impact of tumor heterogeneity on target qualification or clinical response, whether PDXs more faithfully represent the human tumor for pharmacodynamic assay and predictive marker development, or if adequately powered preclinical PDX clinical trials can lead to better evaluation of therapies for future clinical use. Moving forward the PDMR plans to distribute in vitro, early-passage tumor cell cultures and cancer-associated fibroblasts as well as releasing PDX drug response data for a panel of FNA-approved therapeutic agents. Funded by NCI Contract No. HHSN261200800001E Citation Format: Yvonne A. Evrard, Michelle M. Gottholm Ahalt, Sergio . Y. Alcoser, Kaitlyn Arthur, Mariah Baldwin, Linda L. Blumenauer, Carrie Bonomi, Suzanne Borgel, Elizabeth Bradtke, Corinne Camalier, John Carter, Tiffanie Chase, Alice Chen, Lily Chen, Donna W. Coakley, Nicole E. Craig, Biswajit Das, Vivekananda Datta, Jordyn Davidson, Margaret R. DeFreytas, Emily Delaney, Michelle A. Eugeni, Raymond Divelbiss, Palmer Fliss, Thomas Forbes, Marion Gibson, Tara Grinnage-Pulley, Sierra Hoffman, Lilia Ileva, Paula Jacobs, Franklyn Jimenez, Joseph Kalen, Catherine Karangwa, Chris Karlovich, Candace Mallow, Chelsea McGlynn, Jenna E. Moyer, Michael Mullendore, Dianne L. Newton, Nimit Patel, Rajesh Patidar, Kevin Plater, Marianne Radzyminski, Lisa Riffle, Larry Rubinstein, Luke H. Stockwin, Mickey Williams, Melinda G. Hollingshead, James H. Doroshow. The National Cancer Institute9s patient-derived models repository (PDMR) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 986.