Search

Immune-related pneumonitis is an important toxicity associated with checkpoint inhibitor therapy with anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-L1 antibodies, often necessitating discontinuation of treatment. Development of methods to mitigate checkpoint inhibitor–related pneumonitis is required. The contributions of PD-L1, PD-L2, and VEGF to the pathogenesis of pneumonitis were examined in an IL2- plus IL18-induced mouse pneumonitis model (IL pneumonitis model). Furthermore, the incidences of pneumonitis were retrospectively examined in patients with non–small cell lung cancer treated with the anti–PD-L1 mAb atezolizumab plus chemotherapy, with or without the anti-VEGF mAb bevacizumab, in the phase III IMpower150 trial. PD-1 signal blockade by anti–PD-L1 and anti–PD-L2 antibodies aggravated pneumonitis in the IL pneumonitis model. An anti-VEGF antibody prevented PD-1 signal blockade from aggravating pneumonitis in this model. PD-1 signal blockade induced interstitial T-cell infiltration in the lungs, but VEGF blockade did not affect this T-cell infiltration. The anti-VEGF antibody protected against vascular-to-alveolar leakage of protein and fluid due to PD-1 signal blockade in a murine model. In the IMpower150 trial, incidence rates of pneumonitis of any grade were 4.3% in the group without bevacizumab and 2.8% in the group with bevacizumab. In patients with pneumonitis, outcomes of “Not recovered/Not resolved” were reported for 29.4% in the group without bevacizumab compared with 9.1% in the group with bevacizumab. Our findings suggest that anti-VEGF antibodies in combination with checkpoint inhibitors may be a treatment method that can control checkpoint inhibitor–related pneumonitis.

We herein report the rare case of a 72-year-old female who presented with paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) and bronchiolitis obliterans (BO) associated with follicular lymphoma (FL), who was successfully treated with obinutuzumab (GA101; G) and bendamustine (B). The patient had severe erosive stomatitis and bilateral conjunctival hyperemia that persisted for more than 6 months. A huge mass was found in the abdominal cavity, and a biopsy revealed grade 1 FL (stage IV). Based on a lip biopsy result, the patient was diagnosed with PNP associated FL. The patient received bendamustine and obinutuzumab (BG) chemotherapy and FL and PNP responded very well, but BO was additionally associated during the course of BG. BO progressed without exacerbation as BG therapy progressed to a 2 year maintenance therapy with G, and combination of azithromycin, inhaled bronchodilator therapy, and corticosteroid. She was followed up at the outpatient department with no pulmonary function decline or FL and PNP recurrence. Our case suggests that BG could be a promising treatment option for PNP and BO.

Anti-PD-L1 antibodies inhibit interactions between PD-L1 and PD-1 and interactions between PD-L1 and B7-1, thereby reinvigorating anticancer immunity. Although there are numerous ongoing clinical studies evaluating combinations of standard chemotherapies and anti-PD-L1 antibodies, irinotecan has not yet been investigated in this context so there is little information about its compatibility with anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Here we investigated the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 antibody in combination with irinotecan and the role of irinotecan in the tumor–immunity cycle in an FM3A murine tumor model. Despite a transient decrease in lymphocytes in the peripheral blood after irinotecan treatment, the antitumor activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody plus irinotecan was significantly greater than each agent alone. Irinotecan in combination with anti-PD-L1 antibody enhanced proliferation of CD8+ cells in both tumors and lymph nodes, and the number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ cells was higher than either irinotecan or anti-PD-L1 antibody monotherapy. Irinotecan was found to decrease the number of Tregs in lymph nodes and tumors, and specific depletion of Tregs by anti-folate receptor 4 antibodies was found to enhance the proliferation of CD8+ cells in this model. In addition, irinotecan augmented MHC class I expression on tumor cells and concurrently increased PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells. These results indicate that irinotecan may enhance the effect of T cell activation caused by anti-PD-L1 treatment by reducing Tregs and augmenting MHC class I–mediated tumor antigen presentation, and concurrent upregulation of PD-L1 expression can be blocked by the anti-PD-L1 antibody. These interactions may contribute to the superior combination effect.

The anti-VEGF humanized antibody bevacizumab suppresses various malignancies, but tumors can acquire drug resistance. Preclinical studies suggest myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) may be associated with tumor refractoriness to anti-VEGF treatment. Here we report a novel mechanism of tumor escape from anti-VEGF therapy. Anti-VEGF treatment enhanced intratumoral recruitment of CD11bhigh/Gr-1high polymorphonuclear (PMN)-MDSCs in anti-VEGF-resistant Lewis lung carcinoma tumors. This effect was diminished by the anticancer agent capecitabine, a pro-drug converted to 5-fluorouracil, but not by 5-fluorouracil itself. This process was mediated by enhanced intratumoral granulocyte-colony stimulating factor expression, as previously demonstrated. However, neither interleukin-17 nor Bv8, which were previously identified as key contributors to anti-VEGF resistance, was involved in this model. Capecitabine eliminated PyNPase-expressing MDSCs from both tumors and peripheral blood. Capecitabine treatment also reversed inhibition of both antitumor angiogenesis and tumor growth under anti-VEGF antibody treatment, and this effect partially inhibited in tumors implanted in mice deficient in both PyNPases. These results indicate that intratumoral granulocyte-colony stimulating factor expression and CD11bhigh/Gr-1high PMN-MDSC recruitment underlie tumor resistance to anti-VEGF therapy, and suggest PyNPases are potentially useful targets during anti-angiogenic therapy.

Erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), shows superior efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring activating EGFR mutations (EGFR Mut+). However, almost all tumors eventually develop resistance to erlotinib. Recently, the Phase II JO25567 study reported significant prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS) by erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination compared with erlotinib in EGFR Mut+ NSCLC. Herein, we established a preclinical model which became refractory to erlotinib after long-term administration and elucidated the mode of action of this combination. In this model, tumor regrowth occurred after remarkable shrinkage by erlotinib; regrowth was successfully inhibited by erlotinib plus bevacizumab. Tumor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was greatly reduced by erlotinib in the erlotinib-sensitive phase but significantly increased in the erlotinib-refractory phase despite continued treatment with erlotinib. Although EGFR phosphorylation remained suppressed in the erlotinib-refractory phase, phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK), phosphorylated AKT, and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) were markedly higher than in the erlotinib-sensitive phase; among these, pERK was suppressed by erlotinib plus bevacizumab. MVD was decreased significantly more with erlotinib plus bevacizumab than with each drug alone. In conclusion, the erlotinib plus bevacizumab combination demonstrated promising efficacy in the B901L xenograft model of EGFR Mut+ NSCLC. Re-induction of VEGF and subsequent direct or indirect VEGF-dependent tumor growth was suggested as a major mechanism of erlotinib resistance, and erlotinib plus bevacizumab achieved remarkably prolonged antitumor activity in this model.

Background Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapeutics has shown significant survival benefit in clinical studies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since bevacizumab was administered as standard treatment until disease progression, the importance of bevacizumab during the maintenance phase was not prospectively investigated in these studies. Materials and methods Three human NSCLC cell line xenograft models were used to investigate antitumor effect of bevacizumab and tumor microvessel density (MVD) was analyzed. Results In A549 and NCI-H292 models, bevacizumab maintenance following combination with paclitaxel exhibited stronger tumor suppression than its absence. In an NCI-H292 model, bevacizumab maintenance continuously inhibited increase of MVD. In an NCI-H2228 model following induction treatment with pemetrexed and bevacizumab, maintenance with pemetrexed plus bevacizumab, had stronger efficacy than pemetrexed alone and led to lower MVD and level of thymidylate synthase. Conclusion Continuous suppression of angiogenesis by bevacizumab may contribute to the superior efficacy of maintenance treatment containing bevacizumab.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-neutralizing therapy with bevacizumab has become increasingly important for treating colorectal cancer. It was demonstrated that second-line chemotherapy together with bevacizumab after disease progression (PD) on first-line therapy including bevacizumab showed clinical benefits in metastatic colorectal and breast cancers (ML18147 trial, TANIA trial). One of the rationales for these trials was that the refractoriness to first-line therapy is caused by resistance to not so much bevacizumab as to the chemotherapeutic agents. Nevertheless, resistance to bevacizumab cannot be ruled out because VEGF-independent angiogenesis has been reported to be a mechanism of resistance to anti-VEGF therapy. In this study, we used a xenograft model with the human colon cancer HT-29 cells to investigate the mechanisms underlying the effect of continued administration of bevacizumab plus capecitabine even after resistance to bevacizumab was acquired. The combination of capecitabine plus bevacizumab exhibited significantly stronger antitumor and anti-angiogenic activities than did monotherapy with either agent. Capecitabine treatment significantly increased the intratumoral VEGF level compared with the control group; however, the combination with bevacizumab neutralized the VEGF. Among angiogenic factors other than VEGF, intratumoral galectin-3, which reportedly promotes angiogenesis both dependent on, and independently of VEGF, was significantly decreased in the capecitabine group and the combination group compared with the control group. In an in vitro experiment, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), an active metabolite of capecitabine, inhibited galectin-3 production by HT-29 cells. These results suggested that capecitabine has a dual mode of action: namely, inhibition of tumor cell growth and inhibition of galectin-3 production by tumor cells. Thus, capecitabine and bevacizumab may work in a mutually complementary manner in tumor angiogenesis inhibition to overcome the resistance caused by angiogenic factors other than VEGF. These results suggest the clinical relevance and the mechanism of action of treatment with bevacizumab in combination therapy beyond PD.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors have marked antitumor effect. However, monotherapy benefits only a limited population of patients, and further improvement of their effects is required. Here the therapeutic effect and immune response during anti-PD-L1 plus cisplatin combination therapy were investigated in a mouse model. Materials and methods E.G7-OVA, expressing ovalbumin (OVA) gene as a model tumor antigen, was subcutaneously inoculated into syngeneic mice and treated with anti-PD-L1 with/without cisplatin. The tumor growth and activation status of immune cells were evaluated. Results The anti-PD-L1 plus cisplatin combination resulted in a potent antitumor effect leading to tumor shrinkage compared to anti-PD-L1 or cisplatin alone, even though each alone, significantly inhibited tumor growth compared to the control group. During treatment, all groups, including that treated with cisplatin alone, had increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration into tumor tissues compared with the control group, and the therapeutic effect was diminished by CD8+ cell depletion. Aside from its direct cytotoxic effect, cisplatin alone increased chemokine levels and expression of immune checkpoint molecules on CD8+ T-cells in the tumor site. The combination effectively activated OVA-specific CD8+ T-cells. Furthermore, anti-PD-L1 alone and in combination with cisplatin, but not cisplatin alone, induced interferon-gamma-producing CD4+ T-cells. Conclusion These findings provide a rationale for anti-PD-L1 plus cisplatin becoming a promising combination therapy for patients with cancer.

Erlotinib (ERL), an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, shows notable efficacy against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. Bevacizumab (BEV), a humanized monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF), in combination with ERL (BEV+ERL) significantly extended progression-free survival in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC compared with ERL alone. However, the efficacy of BEV+ERL against EGFR-mutated NSCLC harboring T790M mutation or MET amplification, is unclear. Here, we examined the antitumor activity of BEV+ERL in four xenograft models of EGFR-mutated NSCLC (three harboring ERL resistance mutations). In the HCC827 models (exon 19 deletion: DEL), ERL significantly inhibited tumor growth by blocking EGFR signal transduction. Although there was no difference between ERL and BEV+ERL in maximum tumor growth inhibition, BEV+ERL significantly suppressed tumor regrowth during a drug-cessation period. In the HCC827-EPR model (DEL+T790M) and HCC827-vTR model (DEL+MET amplification), ERL reduced EGFR signal transduction and showed less pronounced but still significant tumor growth inhibition than in the HCC827 model. In these models, tumor growth inhibition was significantly stronger with BEV+ERL than with each single agent. In the NCI-H1975 model (L858R+T790M), ERL did not inhibit growth or EGFR signal transduction, and BEV+ERL did not inhibit growth more than BEV. BEV alone significantly decreased microvessel density in each tumor. In conclusion, addition of BEV to ERL did not enhance antitumor activity in primarily ERL-resistant tumors with T790M mutation; however, BEV+ERL enhanced antitumor activity in T790M mutation- or MET amplification-positive tumors as long as their growth remained significantly suppressed by ERL.

Purpose: Intratumoral PD-L1 plays an important role in preventing T cell-mediated cancer cell killing. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies generally show higher clinical benefit specifically in patients with high intratumoral PD-L1 expression. However, anti-PD-L1 antibody, atezolizumab, provide clinical benefit even in the subgroup of cancer patients where PD-L1 is low or undetectable on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TC0/IC0). In this study, we investigated the mechanism of action by which PD-L1-negative tumors responded to an anti-PD-L1 therapy by using a syngeneic mouse tumor model. Experimental Design: We tested the antitumor effect of an anti-mouse PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in vivo in murine models. Flow cytometry, tumor-stimulated IFNγ release assay, T cell repertoire analysis, RNA sequencing, protein immunoassays, and immunohistochemistry were performed on isolated tumors or on tumor-draining lymph nodes (dLN). Results: The anti-PD-L1 mAb showed significant antitumor activity in 6 of the 17 tumor models tested. Model FM3A, one of these 6 sensitive models, showed little intratumoral PD-L1 expression and was classified as an immune desert-like tumor model, but PD-L1 was found to be highly expressed on CD103+CD11c+ cells in dLN in this model. Some of the CD44+CD62L−CD8α+ effector T cells in dLN expressed PD-L1 receptors, i.e. they were PD-1- and/or B7-1-positive cells. Using lymphocytes from dLN, we found that tumor cell-stimulated IFNγ production was significantly increased even in the control group, and it was further significantly increased in the anti-PD-L1 mAb group compared to that in the control group. We found that anti-PD-L1 mAb treatment firstly enhanced T cell priming and increased CXCR3+ activated T cells in dLN. FM3A tumors expressed CXCR3 ligands regardless of anti-PD-L1 mAb treatment. CXCR3 blockade significantly prevented activated CD8α+ T cells from increasing in tumors as a result of anti-PD-L1 mAb treatment but not in dLN and significantly attenuated tumor growth inhibition of anti-PD-L1 mAb. Conclusions: We showed that an anti-PD-L1 mAb exerted antitumor activity in a TC0/IC0-like and immune desert-like tumor model through the blocking of PD-L1 in dLN. Tumor antigen presentation and T cell priming had already occurred in dLN at baseline prior to anti-PD-L1 mAb treatment in the FM3A model but PD-L1 on antigen-presenting cells prevented further T cell priming. We suggested that PD-L1 blockade in dLN appeared to trigger re-activation of T cells leading to antitumor activity. The results also suggested that the antitumor activity of anti-PD-L1 Ab requires both the enhancement of T cell priming by PD-L1 blockade as well as the trafficking of T cells to the tumor in response to the tumor via CXCR3 and its ligands system. Citation Format: Toshiki Iwai, Masamichi Sugimoto, Osamu Kondo. Mechanism of action of anti-PD-L1 antibody in a PD-L1-negative and immune desert-like tumor model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4995.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) show notable effects against non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) harboring EGFR-activating mutations. However, almost all patients eventually acquire resistance to EGFR-TKIs. In this study, we established novel erlotinib resistant NSCLC cells and examined their resistant mechanisms. Resistant cells were established in 14, 3, and 0 wells exposed to 0.1, 1, and 10μM erlotinib, respectively. The IC50 values of these cells were 47- to 1209-fold higher than that of the parent cells. No secondary T790M mutation was detected in any resistant cells. However, in 13/17 resistant cells, EGFR copy number was reduced less than approximately one-eighth of parent cells, and in one resistant cell (B10), >99.99% of the population was EGFR-unamplified cells. Most (97.5%) parent cells showed EGFR amplification, but 2.5% of the population comprised EGFR-unamplified cells. An EGFR-unamplified clone (4D8) isolated from parent cells in erlotinib-free normal medium also showed erlotinib resistance comparable to the resistant B10 cells. Loss of an EGFR-amplified chromosome 7 (EGFR-ampch7) was observed in 4D8 and B10 cells. EGFR-unamplified cells were constantly maintained as a minor population of the parent cells under normal cell culture conditions. In conclusion, loss of an EGFR-ampch7 causes acquired resistance in EGFR-mutated HCC827 cells exposed to a relatively low concentration of erlotinib, but a high concentration prevents the emergence of resistance.

Erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been shown to have benefits for non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer patients; however, almost all patients develop progressive disease during the therapy. On the other hand, it has been reported that a tumor continues to express epidermal growth factor receptor even after developing progressive disease. To demonstrate the clinical relevance of erlotinib treatment after progressive disease, we investigated whether continuous administration of erlotinib in combination with chemotherapy has a useful effect on progressive disease development during erlotinib treatment. For this purpose, we examined the antitumor effect of a combination therapy of a chemotherapeutic agent with erlotinib using two types of erlotinib-resistant tumor xenograft models: a non-small cell lung cancer model, in which EBC-1, H1975 and HCC827TR3 tumors were implanted, and an HPAC pancreatic cancer cell xenograft which generates erlotinib-resistant tumors in vivo. As a result, the combination therapy showed a significantly higher antitumor activity compared with chemomonotherapy in all xenograft models except the H1975 xenografts. Furthermore, erlotinib alone suppressed the phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor in HPAC tumors and the two non-small cell lung cancer cell lines other than H1975. Therefore, combination therapy which uses erlotinib can be considered effective if epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylation is inhibited by erlotinib, even in erlotinib-resistant tumor xenograft models. Our results suggest that the continuous inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylation by erlotinib after progressive disease enhances the antitumor activity of chemotherapy.

Erlotinib treatment in combination with gemcitabine is a standard therapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer in many countries, including the US and the EU. Since mutations of the K-ras oncogene (KRAS) occur in approximately 90% of pancreatic cancers, we examined the antitumor activity of erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine in KRAS-mutated pancreatic cancer cell lines, HPAC and Capan-1, which have the KRAS mutation G12D and G12V, respectively. We analyzed the mode of inhibition of in vitro tumor cell proliferation by means of a combination index and found that a combination treatment of erlotinib plus gemcitabine had an additive effect in the two cell lines. We then examined the effect of erlotinib and gemcitabine on the phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Erlotinib strongly suppressed, while gemcitabine augmented the phosphorylation of EGFR, which was completely blocked by erlotinib in the two cell lines. An in vivo tumor growth inhibition test was then performed using the HPAC tumor xenograft model. The combination therapy of erlotinib and gemcitabine resulted in a significant inhibition of tumor growth compared with erlotinib or gemcitabine monotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show the combination effect of erlotinib and gemcitabine in vivo using a xenograft model of a KRAS-mutated pancreatic cancer cell line.

Peritonitis carcinomatosa is an advanced and intractable state of gastrointestinal and ovarian cancer, where mechanistic elucidation might enable the development of more effective therapies. Peritoneal dissemination of this type of malignancy has been generally thought to initiate from “milky spots” of primitive lymphoid tissues in the peritoneal cavity. In this study, we offer evidence challenging this idea, based on the finding that tumor implantation and directional dissemination was not required for the presence of milky spots, but rather SCF/CXCL12–expressing niche-like cells located at the border regions of perivascular adipose tissue. Interestingly, we found that peritoneal cavity lavage fluid, which specifically contains peritoneal collagen type IV and plasma fibronectin, dramatically facilitated spheroid formation of murine and human colon cancer cells. Spheroid formation strongly induced the expression of CXCR4 in an Sp1-dependent manner to promote niche-directed metastasis. Notably, disrupting sphere formation or inhibiting Sp1 activity was sufficient to suppress tumor dissemination and potentiated chemosensitivity to 5-fluorouracil. Our findings illuminate mechanisms of peritoneal cancer dissemination and highlight the Sp1/CXCR4/CXCL12 signaling axis as a rational target for the development of therapeutics to manage this intractable form of malignancy. Cancer Res; 76(2); 347–57. ©2016 AACR.

Despite recent advances in therapeutic modalities for autoimmune disease (AID) or allogeneic organ transplant, the resultant increase in the number of long-term survivors with sustained immunologic...

We recently reported an internal tandem duplication of the human flt3 receptor gene (FLT3) as a somatic mutation in 17% of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). The present study revealed the duplication at the juxtamembrane and the first tyrosine kinase domains of FLT3 in seven of 92 (8%) patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and AML with trilineage myelodysplasia (AML/TMDS), the diseases which may represent neoplastic changes of pluripotent stem cells. A tandem duplication of exon 11 of FLT3 was harbored by two of 58 (3%) patients with MDS and five of 34 (15%) with overt leukemia, including MDS-derived leukemia, AML/TMDS and therapy-related leukemia. Although the duplicated regions varied within exon 11 in each case, they occurred in-frame, and altered mRNA expressions were demonstrated by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Two cases of MDS with a FLT3 duplication transformed to overt leukemia within a few months. Longitudinal analyses in two other patients with leukemia revealed that the duplication was a late genetic event during the disease course; one of whom showed two independent duplications of FLT3 at the terminal therapy-resistant phase. Of seven patients with the FLT3 duplication, six had abnormal karyotypes, and four harbored a point mutation of the N-RAS and/or TP53 genes. Patients with FLT3 mutations have poor prognoses. This study uncovered the fact that the accumulation of genetic events, including FLT3 duplication, correlates with leukemic transformation from antecedent myelodysplasia and with subsequent disease progression.

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) has been used in the EU and the United States for the treatment of anemia in cancer patients after myelosuppressive chemotherapy or radiotherapy. However, several conflicting results have been reported concerning the detrimental effect of rhEPO on survival benefit in cancer patients. In experimental studies, contradictory results were also reported in in vitro tumor cell proliferation studies and in vivo tumor growth studies using tumor cells expressing EPO-receptor (EPO-R). Therefore, we tried to clarify the effect of epoetin β, a product of rhEPO, on tumor growth in xenograft models using five EPO-R-positive human cancer cell lines, namely the MCF7 breast, 786-O renal, SCH gastric, A549 lung and SK-OV-3 ovarian cancer cell lines. Epoetin β was administered once a week for 3 weeks at doses of 1,000, 3,000 and 10,000 IU/kg in accordance with the clinical administration schedule and dosages. As a result, no enhancement of tumor growth from the administration of epoetin β was observed in any of the xenograft models throughout the experiment duration. The effect of epoetin β on the antitumor activity of bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic agent, was additionally examined using A549 and MCF7 xenograft models, since rhEPO reportedly stimulates tumor neovascularization. Epoetin β showed no significant effect on the antitumor activity of bevacizumab in either xenograft model. These findings suggest that epoetin β is not involved in in vivo tumor growth promotion.

Erlotinib is used as a standard treatment for recurrent advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in NSCLC have been shown to be a predictive factor of erlotinib, although the relationship between K-ras oncogene (KRAS) mutations and erlotinib resistance is controversial. Recently, in vitro sequence-dependent interactions of erlotinib and docetaxel have been studied on as a novel therapeutic approach against NSCLC. The purpose of the present study was to determine the optimum novel regimen of erlotinib and docetaxel against NSCLC cells which have EGFR mutation (HCC827 cells), KRAS mutation (A549 cells) or both wild-type (NCI-H292 cells). First, we analyzed the effects of in vitro combination for cell proliferation-inhibition using a combination index. In all cell lines, docetaxel followed by erlotinib treatment showed nearly additive effects. On the other hand, erlotinib followed by docetaxel treatment showed remarkable antagonistic interactions. Second, we examined the effect of combinations on the in vitro apoptosis induction. Erlotinib followed by docetaxel treatment reduced apoptosis induction compared with docetaxel alone; in contrast, docetaxel followed by erlotinib treatment had no inhibitory effects on docetaxel-induced apoptosis in any of the cell lines. Finally, an in vivo tumor growth inhibition test was performed using xenograft models. Docetaxel followed by erlotinib administration resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition compared with erlotinib or docetaxel monotherapy in all models. In conclusion, we demonstrated that docetaxel followed by erlotinib therapy was a potentially optimum regimen against NSCLC regardless of the mutation status of EGFR and KRAS.

Background The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) show notable effects for non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) harboring EGFR activating mutations. However, almost all patients eventually acquire resistance to EGFR-TKIs within several years. The major mechanisms of acquired resistance including 2nd mutation of T790M and amplification of MET have been identified. However, the mechanisms of other resistance remain unclear. In this study, we established novel erlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells and examined their resistant mechanisms. Methods NSCLC HCC827 cells have an EGFR Exon 19 deletion and gene amplification and are highly sensitive to erlotinib. The resistant cells were established by continuously exposing HCC827 cells to 0.1, 1 or 10 µM of erlotinib in 96 well plates for three months. The resistant mechanisms were determined by direct sequence analysis and EGFR FISH analysis. Results The fourteen and three resistant cells were established by 0.1 µM and 1 µM of erlotinib exposure, respectively. No resistant cells appeared in the wells of 10 µM of erlotinib. The IC50 values of these resistant cells were more than 25-fold higher than that of parental cells. No 2nd mutation of T790M was detected in any of the resistant cells and MET gene amplification was detected in only one resistant cells. Instead, we found that 13/17 resistant cells were dominated by EGFR not amplified cells and one of resistant cells B10 consisted of more than 99.9% of EGFR not amplified cells, and that the parental cells consisted of only 2.5% of EGFR not amplified cells and 97.5% of EGFR amplified cells. EGFR not amplified clone 4D8 isolated from parental cells and showed resistance to erlotinib comparable to the resistant cells B10. Furthermore, we found that EGFR not amplified cells were constantly emerged from EGFR amplified clone isolated from parental cells under normal cell culture condition. Conclusion Loss of amplified EGFR gene with mutation causes acquired resistance in HCC827 cells when exposed to relatively low concentration of erlotinib while high concentration of erlotinib deprives HCC827 cells of the chance of emergence of resistant cells. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Aim: Bevacizumab (Bev) is a humanized anti-human VEGF monoclonal antibody (Ab), and maintaining VEGF inhibition with Bev plus chemotherapy beyond progression (BBP) has had clinical benefits in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However the mechanism of BBP is still unknown and, although some chemotherapeutic agents have been shown to modulate the host immune response against malignancies, the role of chemotherapy in BBP is also unknown. In this study, we examined the mechanism of BBP. Methods: Murine Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) was s.c. inoculated into C57BL/6 or CCR2-/- knockout (KO) mice. Mice were randomly allocated to control and treatment groups after tumor formation. Anti-VEGF Ab (5 mg/kg, weekly) and anti-G-CSF Ab (10 µg/day, daily) were i.p. administered, and capecitabine (Cape) (718 mg/kg, daily) was p.o. administered for 18 days. Cytokine levels were analyzed by ELISA and cytometric bead array. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) were identified as CD11b +/Gr1 high by flow cytometry. Microvessel density (MVD) was determined by CD31-immunostaining. Results: The LLC model showed resistance to anti-VEGF Ab as previously reported [1]. In this model, anti-VEGF Ab increased the intratumor infiltration by MDSC expressing PD-L1. In addition, a significant increase in G-CSF and CCL2 was observed in the tumors. Although anti-G-CSF Ab did not affect tumor growth, anti-G-CSF combined with anti-VEGF significantly reduced tumor growth compared with anti-VEGF alone. The number of intratumor MDSC was significantly decreased in the combination group compared with the anti-VEGF group. However, no difference in the number of intratumor MDSC induced by anti-VEGF was observed in CCR2 KO mice compared with wild type mice. Adding Cape to anti-VEGF abolished both MDSC and the intratumor G-CSF level, and significantly reduced tumor growth compared with either monotherapy. MVD in the combination group was significantly reduced compared with the anti-VEGF group. Conclusions: Add-on Cape abolished MDSC by decreasing intratumor G-CSF, suggesting that the mechanism of BBP may be that chemotherapy recovers the anti-angiogenic effect of Bev. [1] Nature Biotechnology 25, 911-20 (2007). Disclosure: T. Iwai: COI Disclosure: Research funding from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

We examined homozygous deletion, point mutation and expression of DPC4 gene, a recently isolated candidate pancreatic tumor suppressor gene, in 53 patients with myelogenous leukemias and 5 cell lines. The patients consisted of 34 cases of chronic myelogenous leukemia including 22 in the chronic phase, 3 in the accelerated phase, and 9 in blastic crisis, and 19 with acute myelogenous leukemia including 9 at the initial presentation and 10 at relapse. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based deletion analysis for DPC4 exon 8 and PCR-single strand conformation polymorphism study for the entire coding region were carried out. Homozygous deletion or subtle mutation was not detected in any of the samples examined. However, 3 patients with various clinical phases showed a decrease of DPC4 expression. These results suggest that DPC4 alteration is not a crucial event in the development or the progression of myelogenous leukemias.

In this study, we examined a large number of patients to clarify the distribution and frequency of a recently described FLT3 tandem duplication among hematopoietic malignancies, including 112 acute myelocytic leukemia (AML), 55 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 37 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 20 chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), 30 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), 14 adult T cell leukemia, 15 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and 38 multiple myeloma (MM). We also evaluated 71 cell lines derived from 11 AML, 31 ALL, two hairy cell leukemia, three acute unclassified leukemia, 10 CML, 12 NHL including six Burkitt's lymphoma, and two MM. Using genomic PCR of exon 11 coding for the juxtamembrane (JM) domain and first amino acids of the 5'-tyrosine kinase (TK) domain, this length mutation was found only in AML (22/112, 20%) and MDS (1/37). According to the FAB subclassification, they were 5/18 (28%) of M1, 4/29 (14%) of M2, 3/17 (18%) of M3, 6/24 (25%) of M4, 4/20 (20%) of M5 and 1/9 of refractory anemia with excess of blast in transformation. In the various cell lines examined, this abnormality was determined in only one derived from AML and never found in other hematological malignancies. The sequence analysis of the abnormal PCR products revealed that 23 of 24 showed internal tandem duplication with or without insertion of nucleotides. In one AML, insertion and deletion without duplication was determined. All 24 lengthened sequences were in-frame. Duplication takes place in the sequence coding for the JM domain and leaves the TK domain intact. In conclusion, we emphasize that the length mutation of FLT3 at JM/TK-I domains were restricted to AML and MDS. Since all these mutations resulted in in-frame, this abnormality might function for the proliferation of leukemic cells.

e18091 Background: The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) show notable effects for non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) harboring EGFR activating mutations. However, almost all patients eventually acquire resistance to EGFR-TKIs within several years. The major mechanisms of acquired resistance are acquisition of a secondary EGFR mutation T790M and amplification of MET. However, the mechanisms of other resistance remain unclear. In this study, we established novel erlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells and examined their resistant mechanism. Methods: Resistant cells were established by continuously exposing EGFR mutated NSCLC cells HCC827 to 0.1, 1 or 10 μM of erlotinib in 96 well plates for three months. The resistant mechanisms were determined by direct sequence analysis and EGFR FISH analysis. Results: Resistant cells were emerged from 14/96 and 3/96 wells by 0.1 μM and 1 μM of erlotinib exposure, respectively. No resistant cells appeared in the wells of 10 μM of erlotinib. The IC50 values of these resistant cells were more than 100-fold higher than that of parental cells. No secondary mutation of T790M was detected in any of the resistant cells. Instead, we found that 13/17 resistant cells were dominated by EGFR not amplified cells and one of resistant cells B10 consisted of more than 99.9% of them, while the parental cells consisted of 2.5% of EGFR not amplified cells. Then, we isolated EGFR not amplified clone 4D8 from parental cells and found that this clone also had a resistance to erlotinib comparable to the resistant cells B10. Metaphase FISH analysis showed that EGFR amplified cells in parental cells had a chromosome 7 containing multiple copies of EGFR, while EGFR not amplified cells in B10 did not have it. Furthermore, we found that EGFR not amplified cells were constantly emerged from EGFR amplified clone isolated from parental cells under normal cell culture condition. Conclusions: Loss of a chromosome 7 containing multiple copies of EGFR causes acquired resistance in HCC827 cells when exposed to relatively low concentration of erlotinib, while high concentration of erlotinib deprives HCC827 cells of the chance of emergence of resistant cells.

Previous preclinical and clinical findings have suggested a potential role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in osteoclast differentiation and the pathogenesis of bone metastasis in cancer. In this study, we investigated the effect of erlotinib, an orally active EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), on the bone invasion of human non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line NCI-H292. First, we established a novel osteolytic bone invasion model of NCI-H292 cells which was made by inoculating cancer cells into the tibia of scid mice. In this model, NCI-H292 cells markedly activated osteoclasts in tibia, which resulted in osteolytic bone destruction. Erlotinib treatment suppressed osteoclast activation to the basal level through suppressing receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) expression in osteoblast/stromal cell at the bone metastatic sites, which leads to inhibition of osteolytic bone destruction caused by NCI-H292 cells. Erlotinib inhibited the proliferation of NCI-H292 cells in in vitro. Erlotinib suppressed the production of osteolytic factors, such as parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), IL-8, IL-11 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in NCI-H292 cells. Furthermore, erlotinib also inhibited osteoblast/stromal cell proliferation in vitro and the development of osteoclasts induced by RANKL in vitro. In conclusion, erlotinib inhibits tumor-induced osteolytic invasion in bone metastasis by suppressing osteoclast activation through inhibiting tumor growth at the bone metastatic sites, osteolytic factor production in tumor cells, osteoblast/stromal cell proliferation and osteoclast differentiation from mouse bone marrow cells.