Search

Although immunomodulating antibodies are highly effective in metastatic melanoma, their toxicity, related to the activation of T lymphocytes, can be severe. Anticancer vaccines promote a fairly specific response and are very well tolerated, but their effectiveness has yet to be demonstrated. We have been treating patients with advanced melanoma with an autologous dendritic cell vaccine since 2001; to better characterize the safety and efficacy of our product, we designed a retrospective study on all of our patients treated with the vaccine to date. We retrospectively reviewed both case report forms of patients included in clinical trials and medical records of those treated within a compassionate use program. Response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria and toxicity has been graded according to CTCAE 4.0. Although the response rate has been rather low, the median overall survival of 11.4 months and the 1-year survival rate of 46.9% are encouraging, especially considering the fact that data were obtained in a heavily pretreated population and only about one quarter of the patients had received ipilimumab and/or BRAF inhibitors. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the development of an immune response was significantly correlated with a better prognosis (hazard ratio 0.54; P=0.019). The adverse events observed were generally mild and self-limiting. Our analysis confirms the excellent tolerability of our vaccine, making it a potential candidate for combination therapies. As efficacy seems largely restricted to immunoresponsive patients, future strategies should aim to increase the number of these patients.

Of 93 patients with pretreated, BRAFV600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma who received vemurafenib or dabrafenib before (n = 45) or after (n = 48) treatment with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, median overall survival (mOS) from first treatment was 9.9 and 14.5 months, respectively. Among patients treated with a BRAF inhibitor first, mOS from the end of BRAF inhibition was 1.2 months for those who did not complete ipilimumab treatment as per protocol, compared with 12.7 months for those who did (p < .001). Prospective, randomized studies are required to determine the optimal sequencing of ipilimumab and BRAF inhibitors in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma.

Ipilimumab is a fully human, monoclonal antibody that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 to potentiate antitumor T-cell responses. In a phase III trial, ipilimumab monotherapy at 3 mg/kg demonstrated an improvement in overall survival (OS) in patients with previously treated, metastatic melanoma. Here, we conducted a retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety data from a phase II clinical trial in which treatment-naive and previously treated patients with metastatic melanoma received ipilimumab at an investigational dose of 10 mg/kg. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive oral budesonide or placebo, and ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses, to determine whether prophylactic budesonide affected the rate of grade ≥2 diarrhea. One hundred fifteen patients were randomized and treated: 62 had received prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease and 53 had not. No efficacy endpoint was affected by budesonide therapy, and the efficacy data were therefore pooled for budesonide and placebo subgroups. Median OS was 30.5 months for treatment-naive patients who received ipilimumab, with survival rates of 69.4%, 62.9%, and 56.9% at 12, 18, and 24 months. In previously treated patients who received ipilimumab, median OS was 13.6 months, with survival rates of 50.0%, 37.7%, and 28.5% at 12, 18, and 24 months. There were no meaningful differences in the number of objective responses or rate of grade ≥2 diarrhea between groups. These retrospective analyses are the first to provide survival data for ipilimumab in treatment-naive and previously treated patients within the same clinical trial.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are unique specialized antigen-presenting cells capable of priming naive T cells and inducing antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. This study presents an update of clinical results from a DC-based phase I-II clinical vaccine trial in stage IV melanoma. From 2003 to 2010, 27 patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with mature DCs pulsed with autologous tumor lysate and keyhole limpet hemocyanin and with subcutaneous low-dose interleukin-2. Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) tests for in-vivo immunomonitoring were performed at baseline and every four vaccinations thereafter. Two complete, two mixed and six partial responses, and five stable diseases were observed (overall response, 37.0%; clinical benefit, 55.5%). All 15 responders showed DTH positivity. A median overall survival of 22.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.4-61.3] for DTH-positive patients (19) and 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.9-11.9) for DTH-negative patients (8; log rank=7.26; P=0.007) was observed. The overall median overall survival was 16 months (95% CI: 9-33). Our results would seem to highlight a relationship between positive-DTH test and an improved survival.

Background: This study compared the central nervous system (CNS) metastasis incidence between a temozolomide- and a dacarbazine-based regimen in untreated stage IV melanoma patients. Methods: A total of 150 patients were randomly assigned to receive either oral temozolomide (200 mg m−2 per day; days 1–5) or intravenous dacarbazine (800 mg m−2; day 1), in combination with intravenous cisplatin (75 mg m−2; day 1) and subcutaneous interleukin-2 (3 MU twice daily; days 9–18), every 28 days (CTI and CDI). Results: A total of 149 patients were eligible for an intention-to-treat analysis (CTI: n=74, CDI: n=75). The 1-year cumulative CNS incidence failure was 20.6% for CTI and 31.1% for CDI (P=0.22). In all 24 patients in CTI (32%) and 34 (45%) in CDI developed CNS metastases; 31 patients died of early systemic progression, before CNS evaluation. Median survival time was 8.4 months in the CTI and 8.7 in the CDI arm; in patients with CNS metastases the median survival time was 13.5 months in the CTI and 11.5 in the CDI arm. No difference in toxicity was observed between the two arms. Conclusion: The incidence of CNS failures in metastatic melanoma was not significantly reduced and the clinical course was not modified substituting a dacarbazine-based regimen with a temozolomide–based regimen. Patients who developed CNS metastases did not have a worse prognosis than patients progressing in other sites and should not be excluded from new investigational studies.

PURPOSE: Anthracyclines and fluoropyrimidines are very active in breast cancer, while liposomal doxorubicin has low cardiotoxicity. We conducted a dose-finding study of the combination of liposomal doxorubicin and capecitabine in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received liposomal doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 plus capecitabine 825 mg/m2 bid (level 0) or 1,000 mg/m2 bid (level 1) on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and cardiac safety. RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled and a total of 52 courses were delivered (median 6 cycles per patient [range 4-7]). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 15% of cycles, with one episode of febrile neutropenia; most nonhematological toxicities were mild or moderate. No formal MTD was established, and the study was closed because two cardiac events were observed at dose level 1 and another at dose level 0 in patients pretreated with epirubicin > or = 560 mg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for phase II studies is liposomal doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 plus capecitabine 825 mg/m2/bid on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle. Despite the lower cardiotoxicity of liposomal doxorubicin, the risk of cardiac damage persists in anthracycline-pretreated individuals and mandates close cardiac monitoring and careful evaluation of the overall cumulative dose.

A patient with resected stage III nodular melanoma treated with high-dose interferon-α-b2 adjuvant therapy went on to develop generalized lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly. The total body positron emission tomography showed a high 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake (standardized uptake values > 9), indicating possible lymph node and spleen malignancies. Histologic examinations of an axillary lymph node biopsy and an osteomedullar biopsy were negative, excluding both melanoma metastases and hematopoietic tumors. The symptoms completely regressed after suspension of treatment and a follow-up positron emission tomography was negative. It remains to be seen whether this unusual event can be ascribed to an autoimmune phenomenon linked to potential treatment efficacy and survival.

Purpose The PRAME tumour antigen is expressed in several tumour types but in few normal adult tissues. A dose-escalation phase I/II study (NCT01149343) assessed the safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity of the PRAME immunotherapeutic (recombinant PRAME protein (recPRAME) with the AS15 immunostimulant) in patients with advanced melanoma. Here, we report the phase I dose-escalation study segment. Patients and methods Patients with stage IV PRAME-positive melanoma were enrolled to 3 consecutive cohorts to receive up to 24 intramuscular injections of the PRAME immunotherapeutic. The RecPRAME dose was 20, 100 or 500 µg in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively, with a fixed dose of AS15. Adverse events (AEs), including predefined dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the anti-PRAME humoral response (ELISA), were coprimary end points. Cellular immune responses were evaluated using in vitro assays. Results 66 patients were treated (20, 24 and 22 in the respective cohorts). AEs considered by the investigator to be causally related were mostly grade 1 or 2 injection site symptoms, fatigue, chills, fever and headache. Two DLTs (grade 3 brain oedema and proteinuria) were recorded in two patients in two cohorts (cohorts 2 and 3). All patients had detectable anti-PRAME antibodies after four immunisations. Percentages of patients with predefined PRAME-specific-CD4+T-cell responses after four immunisations were similar in each cohort. No CD8+ T-cell responses were detected. Conclusions The PRAME immunotherapeutic had an acceptable safety profile and induced similar anti-PRAME-specific humoral and cellular immune responses in all cohorts. As per protocol, the phase II study segment was initiated to further evaluate the 500 µg PRAME immunotherapeutic dose. Trial registration number NCT01149343, Results.

Alterations in the expression of signal activation molecules, such as the T-cell receptor (TCR) zeta and epsilon chains and p56lck tyrosine kinase, are described in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL). The aim of this study was to ascertain if such molecules were present in near-tumor-tissue lymphocytes (NTTL) and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), as well as TIL, of renal cell carcinoma patients, to verify whether this tumor induces immunosuppression only locally or affects distant lymphocytes as well. Tissue from the tumor and from healthy nearby sites, as well as blood samples, were obtained from 27 consecutive patients who had undergone radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Phenotype analysis and immunohistochemical staining of the TCR zeta and epsilon chains and p56lck were performed with standard techniques on TIL, NTTL, and PBL, and values were compared for each patient. Low expression of the TCR zeta chain and an almost complete absence of TCR epsilon chain and p56lck expression was observed in TIL (median values: 10% for zeta chain and 0% for epsilon and p56lck). In NTTL, these signal transduction molecules were expressed by a higher percentage of cells (60%, 50%, and 60%, respectively; p=0.000 vs. TIL), whereas PBL showed an almost normal expression of zeta and epsilon chains (80% and 90%, respectively; p=0.000 vs. TIL). Conversely, p56lck was detected in a greater proportion of NTTL than PBL (50% vs. 10%; p=0.001). The absence or the very low expression of signaling activation molecules in TIL compared with NTTL and PBL in renal cancer patients suggest that tumor-induced immunosuppression generally occurs or starts locally.

PURPOSE: Phase II and III studies have shown that the addition of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa-2b (IFNα-2b) in multiagent chemotherapy (CT) for advanced melanoma increases overall response (OR), albeit without clear evidence of an improvement in overall survival (OS). Treatment with high-dose IL-2 can cause severe toxicity and is normally administered in an inpatient setting. We conducted a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial in outpatients with metastatic melanoma to compare CT with biochemotherapy (bioCT) using immunomodulant doses of IL-2 and IFNα-2b. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-six eligible patients with advanced melanoma were randomized to receive CT (cisplatin and dacarbazine with or without carmustine every 21 days) or bioCT comprising the same CT regimen followed by low-dose subcutaneous IL-2 for 8 days and IFNα2b three times a week, both for six cycles. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 18 (CT) and 16 (bioCT) months, median OS was 9.5 versus 11.0 months (P = .51), respectively. In the 89 CT-arm patients, 18 ORs (20.2%) (three complete responders [CRs] and 15 partial responders [PRs]) were observed according to World Health Organization criteria. In the 87 bioCT-arm patients, 22 ORs (25.3%) (three CRs and 19 PRs) (P = .70) were recorded. Treatment-related toxicity was fairly similar in both arms. CONCLUSION: The addition of low-dose immunotherapy did not produce a statistically significant advantage in OS, time to progression, or OR. However, the 11-month median OS in the bioCT arm does not differ greatly from the best results with high-dose IL-2–containing regimens reported in the literature. Furthermore, our treatment schedule was carried out on outpatients and had an acceptable level of toxicity.

MicroRNAs are increasingly being recognized to play an important role in finely tuning gene expression; therefore, their dysregulation in cancer has been investigated extensively. In terms of melanoma, they are involved in the regulation of many genes and pathways impacting invasiveness, dissemination, and disease progression. Many microRNAs also target genes regulating ontogenesis and functions of the immune system. Indeed, fine-tuning of gene expression by microRNAs is necessary for normal differentiation of the various components of the immune system and for mounting an effective innate and cell-mediated response, which has been shown to be able to control tumor growth. Dendritic cells, by presenting antigens to and activating naive T cells, constitute a critical aspect and have been therefore been used in many studies of cancer vaccination with promising results. Many genes regulating functions and plasticity of dendritic cells are indeed targeted by microRNAs, whose expression is also dependent on maturation status. Therefore, microRNAs could provide new potential therapeutic targets both on the tumor and on the immune system, and could also be used to characterize dendritic cells utilized in immunotherapy trials.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is often unresectable at diagnosis, is refractory to cytotoxic agents and is frequently complicated by pleural effusion. The expected survival range for patients with or without involvement of visceral pleura is respectively 1–9 and 9–12 months; mesothelioma-related pleural effusion severely impairs the patients’ quality of life and easily relapses after conservative treatments. Intrapleural administration of IL-2 is reported to be effective both in tumor-associated malignant pleurisy and on primary mesothelioma, whereas few data exist about IL-2 systemic administration. In order to assess the palliative and therapeutic activity of IL-2 in unresectable pleural malignant mesothelioma with pleural effusion, we performed a phase II study on 31 consecutive patients (M/F 16/15; median age 61 years, range 40–84; PS ECOG 0 n=7; ECOG 1 n=15; ECOG 2 n=9; stage IA n=13; IB n=9; II n=7; IV=2) who received first-line therapy with intrapleural repeated instillation of 9 000 000 I.U. IL-2 twice/weekly for 4 weeks, after needle thoracenthesis. In nonprogressing patients, 3 000 000 I.U. IL-2 were subcutaneously administered thrice weekly for up to 6 months. Toxicity (WHO criteria) with intrapleural IL-2 consisted of grade 3 fever in 6/31 (19%) patients and of cardiac toxicity (failure) grade 3 in one patient (3%); toxicity during subcutaneous treatment was mild to moderate, mainly a flu-like syndrome. In 28/31 (90%) of patients there was no further or minimal (asymptomatic) pleural fluid collection (according to Paladine criteria); pleurisy relapsed only in 1/28 patients after 19 months. Tumor objective response (WHO criteria), evaluated by CT, occurred in seven patients (one CR and six PR; ORR 22%); ten patients achieved SD and 14 patients progressed. Median overall survival was 15 months (range 5–39) in all patients. IL-2 intrapleural administration followed by low-dose IL-2 subcutaneously in pleurisy-complicated malignant mesothelioma is feasible and active both in palliation of pleural effusion and on primary tumor, with manageable toxicity. The overall survival observed in nonprogressing patients warrants further randomized studies with IL-2 aimed to the patient outcome.

Aims and background Adoptive immunotherapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) reinfusion plus continuous interleukin-2 (IL-2) infusion could represent an innovative way of treating immunogenic tumors. This study therefore recruited melanoma, colorectal and renal carcinoma patients whose metastases had been surgically removed. Study design The treatment was initially given to 22 patients with advanced disease and more recently to 39 disease-free (DF) patients after radical metastasectomy. The latter group was selected in view of a theoretically better lymphocyte/tumor cell ratio and with the aim to improve disease-free and overall survival (DFS-OS) in very high risk patients. The starting IL-2 dose was 12 MlU/day (West's schedule); doses were modulated on the bases of toxicity parameters. Even though patients received different total amounts of IL-2, all of them completed the treatment. Results The treatment was offered to 22 advanced-stage cancer patients (12 melanomas, 9 colorectal carcinomas, 1 kidney carcinoma). Few and short stabilizations were observed with a median survival of 12 months (range, 3-29). Subsequently, another 39 patients were treated in an adjuvant setting after radical metastasectomy (18 melanomas, 19 colorectal carcinomas, 2 kidney cancers). Eleven out of 17 DF melanoma patients (64.7%) are still free of disease after a median of 37+ months (range, 5+ - 69+). In the group of DF colorectal cancer patients eight (44.4%) are still DF after a median of 21+ months (range, 7+ - 67+ months). One of the two patients with kidney cancer is still DF after 28+ months. Two patients (1 melanoma and 1 colorectal cancer) had just been treated and were therefore not evaluable. Severe toxicity occurred in three cases but was rapidly resolved. There was a great diversity in IL-2 doses administered; comparison of the total IL-2 dose administered between the patients who are still DF and those who progressed revealed no difference between the two groups of colorectal cancer patients, whereas melanoma patients who progressed rebeived an average IL-2 dose of 6.5 MlU/day versus 15.8 MlU/day in DF patients. No differences were observed in any of the groups between the number of TILs reinfused and clinical response. Conclusions The study is still ongoing; it has been decided to focus on DF melanoma patients after radical metastasectomy, for whom the data seem to be encouraging. Further endpoints of the study are the role of IL-2 dosage in the adjuvant setting, and the possibility to make correlations between biological parameters and clinical results.

Adoptive tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in combination with a modulated dosage of interleukin-2 (IL-2) can be used with acceptable toxicity in the treatment of immunogenic tumours. Following an experience of reinfusion in advanced melanoma, colorectal and renal cancer patients, treatment was given to disease-free patients after metastasectomy. The high risk of relapse and favourable ratio between reinfused TIL and possible microscopic residual disease determined this choice of adjuvant treatment. A group of 12 patients with advanced disease (7 melanoma, 4 colorectal carcinoma, 1 kidney carcinoma) were treated with TIL (median 5.8 x 10(10) cells) and IL-2 (West's schedule) modulated towards a lower dosage (from 12 to 6 MIU/day) in order to maintain an acceptable level of toxicity. As treatment was well tolerated, it was offered to another 22 patients in an adjuvant setting after metastasectomy (11 melanoma, 10 colorectal carcinoma, 1 renal cancer), the median dose of TIL reinfused being 4.95 x 10(10) cells. No objective response was observed in advanced patients: all patients progressed after a median of 1.5 months (0-8 months) and median survival was 8 months (3-22+ months). Thirteen patients from the second group are still disease-free after a median of 23+ months (9+ - 47+ months). The remaining 9 patients relapsed after a median of 5 months (3-18 months). Toxicity was moderate as clinical and hepatic/renal function parameters were used to assess the need for dose reductions. Consequently, there was great diversity in IL-2 dosages administered. In particular, there seemed to be a difference in IL-2 doses administered between disease-free cases and those who progressed (17.5 MIU/day versus 7 MIU/day in melanoma patients; 11.2 MIU/day versus 7.1 MIU/day in colorectal cancer patients). By contrast, no differences were observed between number of TIL reinfused and clinical response. Phenotypical characteristics of reinfused TIL were similar to those reported in the literature: 97% were CD3 and 92% were CD8. Aspecific cytolytic activity was evaluated on 12 cases whereas, in 2 melanoma cases, autologous tumour tissue was available for the specific cytotoxicity test. Perforin levels in TIL measured at the end of culture were generally high or very high. Cytokine levels were measured on the supernatant at the end of culture, with an estreme variability in results. Finally, delta chain and p56lck were histologically assessed on the resected tissue from which TIL were cultivated. There were virtually none of the former and a complete absence of the latter, which concurs with data reported in the literature. The same immunocytochemical analysis was carried out on TIL at the end of culture. This time an almost complete restoration of both functions was seen, especially in melanoma patients, who are still free from disease. The study is on-going and it has been decided to focus on disease-free patients after metastasectomy in order to increase the number and possibility of clinical and histological correlations.

BACKGROUND: Tumor cells killed by radiation therapy (RT) are a potentially good source of antigens for dendritic cell (DC) uptake and presentation to T-cells. RT upregulates cell death receptors such as Fas/CD95 and MHC-I, induces the expression of co-stimulatory molecules on tumor cells, and promotes production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. High-dose interleukin-2 (HD-IL-2) bolus has been shown to obtain objective response rates ranging from 15% to 17% in patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell carcinoma (RCC), with 6% to 8% of cases experiencing a durable complete response. However, HD-IL-2 is also associated with severe side-effects; if it is to remain a component of the curative treatment strategy in patients with metastatic melanoma or RCC, its therapeutic efficacy must be improved and patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment must be identified a priori. We designed a clinical study combining immunomodulating RT and HD-IL-2 to evaluate their clinical and immunological efficacy and to explore the predictive and prognostic value of 1) tumor-specific immune response and 2) serum levels of proangiogenic cytokines. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary endpoint of this proof-of-principle phase II study is immune response. Secondary endpoints are the identification of biomarkers potentially predictive of response, toxicity, response rate and overall survival. Three daily doses of booster radiotherapy (XRT) at 6–12 Gy will be administered to at least one metastatic field on days −3 to −1 before the first and third cycle. Treatment with IL-2 (dose 18 MIU/m2/day by continuous IV infusion for 72 hours) will start on day +1 and will be repeated every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles and then every 4 weeks for a further 2 cycles. Immune response against tumor antigens expressed by melanoma and/or RCC will be evaluated during treatment. Circulating immune effectors and regulators, e.g. cytotoxic T lymphocytes and regulatory T cells, as well as serum levels of proangiogenic/proinflammatory cytokines will also be quantified. DISCUSSION: This study aims to evaluate the potential immunological synergism between HD-IL-2 and XRT, and to identify biomarkers that are predictive of response to IL-2 in order to spare potentially non responding patients from toxicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT no. 2012-001786-32 CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01884961

The GOLFIG-2 phase III trial was designed to compare the immunobiological activity and antitumor efficacy of GOLFIG chemoimmunotherapy regimen with standard FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy in frontline treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This trial was conceived on the basis of previous evidence of antitumor and immunomodulating activity of the GOLFIG regimen in mCRC. GOLFIG-2 is a multicentric open/ label phase III trial (EUDRACT: 2005-003458-81). Chemo-naive mCRC patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive biweekly standard FOLFOX-4 or GOLFIG [gemcitabine (1000 mg/m 2, day 1); oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, day 2); levofolinate (100 mg/m2, days 1-2), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (400 mg/m2 in bolus followed by 24 h infusion at 800 mg/m2,days 1-2), sc. GM-CSF (100 μg, days 3-7); sc. aldesleukin (0 ° 5 MIU bi-daily, days 8-14 and 17-30)] treatments. The study underwent early termination because of poor recruitment in the control arm. After a median follow-up of 43.83 months, GOLFIG regimen showed superiority over FOLFOX in terms of progression-free survival [median 9 ° 23 (95% confidence interval (CI), 6 ° 9-11.5) vs. median 5.70 (95% CI, 3.38-8.02) months; hazard ratio (HR): 0.52 (95% CI, 0.35-0.77), P=0 ° 002] and response rate [66.1% (95% CI, 0.41-0.73) vs. 37 °0% (95% CI, 0.28-0.59), P=0.002], with a trend to longer survival [median 21.63 (95% CI, 18.09-25.18) vs. 14.57mo (95% CI, 9.07-20.07); HR: 0 ° 79 (95% CI, 0.52-1.21); P=0.28]. Patients in the experimental arm showed higher incidence of non-neutropenic fever (18.5%), autoimmunity signs (18.5%), an increase in the number of monocytes, eosinophils, CD4+ T lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and a decrease in immunoregulatory (CD3+CD4 +CD25+ FoxP3+) T cells. Taken together, these findings provide proofof- principle that GOLFIG chemoimmunotherapy may represent a novel reliable option for first-line treatment of mCRC. Copyright © 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Background Patients with advanced melanoma are faced with a poor prognosis and, until recently, limited treatment options. Ipilimumab, a novel immunotherapy that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4, was the first agent to improve survival of patients with advanced melanoma in a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. We used data from an expanded access programme (EAP) at Italian centres to evaluate the clinical activity and safety profile of ipilimumab 10 mg/kg in patients with advanced melanoma in a setting more similar to that of daily practice. Methods Data were collected from patients enrolled in an ipilimumab EAP across eight participating Italian centres. As per the EAP protocol, patients had life-threatening, unresectable stage III/IV melanoma, had failed or did not tolerate previous treatments and had no other therapeutic option available. Treatment comprised ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for a total of four doses. If physicians believed patients would continue to derive benefit from ipilimumab treatment, maintenance therapy with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg was provided every 12 weeks. Tumour responses were assessed every 12 weeks using modified World Health Organization criteria and safety continuously monitored. Results Seventy-four pretreated patients with advanced melanoma were treated with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg. Of these, 9 (13.0%) had an objective response, comprising 3 patients with a complete response and 6 with a partial response. Median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval, 5.3–8.7) and 16.6% of patients were alive after 3 years. Forty-five patients (60.8%) reported treatment-related adverse events of any grade, which were most commonly low-grade pruritus, pain, fever and diarrhoea. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs were reported in 8 patients (10.8%). Conclusions The clinical activity and safety profile of ipilimumab 10 mg/kg in the EAP was similar to that seen in previous clinical trials of ipilimumab in pretreated patient populations.

3040 Background: Vaccination with dendritic cells (DC) is still a valid experimental option for metastatic melanoma (MM). However, only a few patients experience long-lasting objective responses and the majority of clinical responders afterwards relapse and die. Which mechanisms are actually responsible for this “secondary resistance” to whole tumor antigens-loaded DC vaccines is largely unknown. It has been hypothesized that suppressive immune cell subpopulations, regulatory T cells in particular, may progressively accumulate in tumor tissues thus hampering therapy-induced antitumor immune responses along time. To elucidate this issue we evaluated changes induced by immunologically effective DC vaccination in the composition of tumor-associated T cell subpopulations. Methods: 12 patients with MM previously enrolled in a phase I/II DC vaccine trial and for which tumor tissue taken before and after at least 4 induction vaccine doses were available, were included in the study. Intratumoral lymphocytes were evaluated by CD3, CD4, CD8, FoxP3 and GrB immunostainings, and quantified by a computer-assisted method. A nonparametric two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized for evaluating differences in the distribution of the number of cell positive for each marker on the total cell counts in pre- and post-vaccine biopsies. Results: Our data showed a considerable and statistically significant decrease of intratumoral FoxP3+regulatory T cells in melanoma tissues after DC vaccination. In addition, the concurrent increase of intratumoral activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes, as shown by CD8 and Granzyme B stainings, indicated that this decrease has likely a functional relevance. Conclusions: Our findings that vaccination with DC loaded with autologous tumor lysate strongly reduces the intratumoral content of regulatory T cells add strength to the rationale for the development of potentially more effective combination schedules where whole tumor antigen-loaded DC vaccine prime and partially activate tumor-specific low-affinity T cells in a first tumor antigen-focusing step, followed by boosting with non-maximal doses of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies.

A 37-year-old patient with liver metastases from gastric cancer was treated with a double adoptive immunotherapy regimen comprising tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes plus interleukin-2 and subsequently local-regional lymphokine-activated killer cells plus interleukin-2 because of an extremely high in vitro cytotoxic specific activity on established gastric cancer cell lines. The necrosis verified in the center of the hepatic metastasis would appear to demonstrate treatment efficacy, but no clinical response was seen. In vitro cytotoxicity data alone are insufficient to predict the clinical efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy.

Patients with metastatic melanoma have a poor prognosis; the results of chemotherapy remain unsatisfactory. Ipilimumab, an anticytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 antibody, has shown promising results in several clinical trials. In this report, advanced melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab were scored according to novel immune-related response criteria (irRC) in an attempt to capture additional response patterns and to avoid premature treatment cessation. Thirty-six heavily pretreated metastatic melanoma patients recieved ipilimumab within five international clinical trials at our Institution from May 2006 to August 2008. Disease progression was defined as an increase in tumor burden by at least 25% compared with the nadir, irrespective of any initial increase in baseline lesions or the appearance of new lesions. We report unusually long-lasting responses in patients treated with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg. An overall response was observed in six out of 30 patients (20%), a complete response in three (10%), and disease control in 11 (37%), which seemed to be of a long duration (median of 16 months; complete response 36+, 34+, and 41+ months). All irRC patterns seemed to be strongly associated with an improvement in overall survival. Interestingly, we found a correlation between the presence of a grade 3/4 immune-related adverse event and responses, time to progression, and overall survival. Ipilimumab therapy resulted in clinically meaningful responses in advanced melanoma patients, supporting the need for further irRC validation.

Current systemic treatments for metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) have not improved overall survival (OS). The fully human anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody, ipilimumab, improved OS of patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma in a phase 3 trial; however, UM patients were excluded. The aim of this subanalysis, performed by the ipilimumab-ocular melanoma expanded access program (I-OMEAP) study group, was to assess the activity and safety of ipilimumab in patients with UM in a setting similar to daily clinical practice. Patients participating in a multicenter expanded access program (EAP) received induction treatment with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg. Maintenance doses were administered in patients who experienced clinical benefit or at physicians’ discretion. Tumor assessment was evaluated per modified World Health Organization criteria at baseline, Week 12, Week 24, and Week 36. Adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs (irAEs) were collected according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Thirteen pretreated patients with metastatic UM were treated at 6 European institutions. All patients received at least one dose of ipilimumab. Overall, no objective responses were observed; however, two patients had stable disease (SD), with a third patient achieving SD after initial progressive disease. Median OS as of July 1, 2011, was 36 weeks (range 2–172+ weeks). No grade 3/4 AEs of non-immune origin were reported. Three patients (23%) experienced grade 3 irAEs (1 thrombocytopenia, 1 diarrhea, and 1 alanine/aspartate aminotransferase elevation) that resolved with steroid therapy. The results indicate UM is a potential indication for ipilimumab treatment that should be further investigated in clinical trials.

8513 Background: Ipilimumab (ipi), an antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4, improves survival in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM); however, objective tumor responses are limited. NIBIT-M1 aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of ipi plus fotemustine (FTM), a cytotoxic alkylating drug, in pts with MM. Methods: Eligible pts, with or without brain metastases, received induction therapy with ipi 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W) for four doses and FTM 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks. Ipi and FTM maintenance therapy was provided Q12W from Week 24 and Q3W from Week 9, respectively. The primary objective was the immune-related (ir) disease control rate (irDCR: pts with complete response [CR], partial response [PR] or stable disease [SD] as determined using the ir response criteria). Secondary objectives included ir objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS), and safety. Tumor assessments were performed Q8W from Week 12 to Week 36 and Q12W thereafter. Results: Among 86 pts with unresectable stage III (n=3) or stage IV (n=83) MM treated at 7 NIBIT centers, 42 were previously untreated, 44 had progressed following first-line treatment and 20 had asymptomatic brain metastases. As of December 2011, the irDCR was 46.5% (40/86; 95% CI, 35.7–57.6%); the irORR was 29.1% (95% CI, 19.8–39.8%; 5 CRs and 20 PRs) and with a median 8.3 months follow-up, median irPFS was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.5–7.1). The 1-year OS rate was 51.8% (95% CI, 37.5–66.1%); median OS was not yet reached. Among all pts, 58.1% and 87% completed ipi or FTM induction, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events (AEs) (reported in 54.6% pts overall) were myelotoxicity (43.5%), increased ALT/AST (14.1/10.6%), gastrointestinal (4.7%) and skin-related (2.3%). AEs were generally manageable and reversible per protocol guidance. Conclusions: The study reached its primary objective with 46.5% of pts achieving disease control. The combination of ipi plus FTM is safe; the irDCR, 1-year OS rate and median irPFS warrant its further investigation in MM pts.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with IL-2-dependent cell-mediated immunodeficiency. As IL-2 is the main lymphocyte growth factor, a phase III randomized multicenter trial was conducted to evaluate the impact of subcutaneous low-dose IL-2 added to standard chemotherapy (CT) on overall survival (OS) in advanced NSCLC patients. Patients (n=241) with histologically confirmed stage IIIb or IV non-operable NSCLC underwent stratified randomization on the basis of center, ECOG PS, stage of disease and percentage of weight loss. Patients received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 + cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on day 2 every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles [chemotherapy (CT) arm]. In the CT+IL-2 arm, patients also received low-dose subcutaneous IL-2 3,000,000 IU/die on days 3-5, 9-11, 15-17. The study had 90% power to detect a 20% absolute increase in 1-year OS with 118 patients/arm. An overall response (OR) rate of 12.8% (14% in the CT+IL-2 arm and 11.4% in CT arm) was observed. Stable disease was 70 and 66.7%, and progressive disease 16 and 21.8% in the CT+IL-2 and CT arms, respectively. No differences in response were found in any subgroup analysis. At a median follow-up of 32 months, 1-year OS was 45% for the CT+IL-2 arm vs. 51% for the CT arm (p=0.456 log-rank). Median progression-free survival was 6.6 months in the CT+IL-2 arm vs. 6.9 months in the CT arm (p=0.573, log-rank). A higher number of grade 4 toxicities were reported with CT+IL-2. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were gastrointestinal toxicity (mainly nausea and diarrhea) and myelosuppression. No relevant differences in clinical outcome were observed from the addition of IL-2 to CT. Future studies investigating the role of T-regulators in chemoimmunotherapeutic regimens could be performed.

Previous studies have shown that tumor endothelial markers (TEMs 1-9) are up modulated in immunosuppressive, pro-angiogenic dendritic cells (DCs) found in tumor microenvironments. We recently reported that monocyte-derived DCs used for vaccination trials may accumulate high levels of TEM8 gene transcripts. Here, we investigate whether TEM8 expression in DC preparations represents a specific tumor-associated change of potential clinical relevance. TEM8 expression at the mRNA and protein level was evaluated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and cytofluorimetric analysis in human clinical grade DCs utilized for the therapeutic vaccination of 17 advanced cancer patients (13 melanoma and 4 renal cell carcinoma). The analyses revealed that DCs from patients markedly differ in their ability to up-modulate TEM8. Indeed, mDCs from eight non-progressing patients [median overall survival (OS) = 32 months, all positive to the delayed-type hypersensitivity test (DTH)], had similar TEM8 mRNA expression levels [mDCs vs. immature iDCs; mean fold increase (mfi) = 1.97] to those found in healthy donors (mfi = 2.7). Conversely, mDCs from nine progressing patients (OS < 5 months, all but one with negative DTH) showed an increase in TEM8 mRNA levels (mfi = 12.88, p = 0.0018). The present observations suggest that TEM8 expression levels in DC-based therapeutic vaccines would allow the selection of a subgroup of patients who are most likely to benefit from therapeutic vaccination.

Purpose: Diarrhea (with or without colitis) is an immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with ipilimumab. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multinational phase II trial was conducted to determine whether prophylactic budesonide (Entocort EC), a nonabsorbed oral steroid, reduced the rate of grade ≥2 diarrhea in ipilimumab-treated patients with advanced melanoma. Experimental Design: Previously treated and treatment-naïve patients (N = 115) with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma received open-label ipilimumab (10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses) with daily blinded budesonide (group A) or placebo (group B) through week 16. The first scheduled tumor evaluation was at week 12; eligible patients received maintenance treatment starting at week 24. Diarrhea was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 3.0. Patients kept a diary describing their bowel habits. Results: Budesonide did not affect the rate of grade ≥2 diarrhea, which occurred in 32.7% and 35.0% of patients in groups A and B, respectively. There were no bowel perforations or treatment-related deaths. Best overall response rates were 12.1% in group A and 15.8% in group B, with a median overall survival of 17.7 and 19.3 months, respectively. Within each group, the disease control rate was higher in patients with grade 3 to 4 irAEs than in patients with grade 0 to 2 irAEs, although many patients with grade 1 to 2 irAEs experienced clinical benefit. Novel patterns of response to ipilimumab were observed. Conclusions: Ipilimumab shows activity in advanced melanoma, with encouraging survival and manageable adverse events. Budesonide should not be used prophylactically for grade ≥2 diarrhea associated with ipilimumab therapy. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(17):5591–8)

The efficacy and tolerability of fotemustine, cisplatin, alpha-interferon and interleukin-2 biochemotherapy were evaluated in advanced melanoma patients. The schedule consisted of fotemustine (100 mg/m) and cisplatin (75 mg/m) intravenous on day 1, followed by subcutaneous interleukin-2 at a dose of 4.5 MIU on days 3-5 and 8-12 and alpha-interferon at a dose of 3 MU three times/week, every 3 weeks for six cycles. Sixty patients were evaluated for tumour response, 12 of whom had brain metastases (BM). One patient (1.7%) with BM achieved a complete response and partial responses were observed in 10 patients (16.7%), including one BM patient. Overall response rate was 18.4 and 16.6% in BM patients (median response duration 8.2 months). Disease control, defined as overall response and stable disease, was 58.4% in all patients and 75% in patients with BM. Median time to progression was 3.2 months (4.2 months in BM patients). Median overall survival was 8.9 months (7.6 months in BM patients). Toxic events were mild to moderate. This combination was well tolerated and showed acceptable clinical activity, especially in BM patients.

This study analyses the health related quality of life (HRQOL) of advanced melanoma patients, in a randomised trial comparing bio-chemotherapy (bio-CT) versus chemotherapy (CT). The trial enrolled 178 patients and the median survival was not statistically different between the two arms. HRQOL was assessed at baseline and before each cycle of therapy, using the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) questionnaire completed with 140 patients. At baseline, overall quality of life and psychological distress scores were the most impaired, compared with the normal population. During treatment, the difference between the two arms in the changes from baseline was statistically significant ( P =0.03) only in the overall quality of life score, with a decrease of 6.28 points in the bio-CT arm. The mean values decreased significantly in all domains in bio-CT arm, but only in activity level and physical symptom distress scores in the CT arm. Testing HRQOL variables and prognostic clinical factors in a Cox model, only the serum level of lactic dehydrogenase, baseline overall quality of life and the physical symptom distress scores remained significant independent prognostic factors for survival. A score of less than 75 points in the overall quality of life and in the physical symptom distress domains was associated with a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 2.31 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.09–4.90) and 1.92 (95% CI: 1.10–3.36), respectively.

We investigated the effects of interleukin-2 (IL-2) exposure on T-cell signal transduction molecules and apoptosis markers in tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) isolated from 20 melanoma and 16 colorectal carcinoma metastases and expanded in vitro for therapeutic reinfusion. Before IL-2 culture, TIL showed undetectable or very low levels of T-cell receptor (TCR) epsilon chain, p56(lck), Fas ligand (FasL) and Bax expression, while Bcl-2 values were elevated. Cancer cells were characterised by low or absent Fas and Bcl-2 and high Bax expression. Notably, they also expressed FasL. After 41-48 days of IL-2 culture, TCR epsilon chain and p56(lck) expression of TIL rose to median values of approximately 80 and 30% positive cells, respectively (P0.001), FasL expression was detected in 45% cells from melanomas (P0.001) and in 3% from colorectal carcinomas (P=0.09), and Bax-positive cells increased from 17.5 to 70% (P=0.005). Moreover, TCR zeta chain-positive cells were significantly increased from baseline (P=0.001), Bcl-2-positive cells dropped from 50 to 1% (P=0.007) and perforin content was high, while Fas expression was not significantly modified by IL-2 culture. In conclusion, our data suggest that the degree of immunosuppression in TIL from melanomas and colorectal carcinomas is very high, and the apoptosis markers' repertoire of cancer cells resembles that of immune-privileged tissue. Interleukin-2 culture appears to restore lymphocyte activation mechanisms, resulting in consistent FasL expression and perforin production.

Adoptive immunotherapy with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and interleukin (IL)-2 is reasonably effective in the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma. However, theoretically it should be of greater benefit as adjuvant therapy, especially in high-risk stages (resected stages III and IV). In a preliminary study, 25 patients (aged 23-72 years) with stage III-IV melanoma who underwent resection of metachronous metastases were reinfused with TIL cultivated and expanded in vitro with IL-2 from surgically removed metastases. IL-2 (starting dose 12 x 10 6 IU/m 2 ) was co-administered as a continuous infusion according to West's scheme. A total of 8/22 (36.3%) evaluable patients were disease-free (DF) at a median follow-up of 5 years. DF survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 44% and 37%, respectively, at 2 years, and 52% and 45% at 3 years. The CNS was the only site of disease recurrence in 57% of patients who relapsed. DF patients received a higher median dose of IL-2 than those who progressed (total dose 110 x 10 6 versus 86 x 10 6 IU/m 2 , respectively). The progressive reduction in IL-2 dosage allowed all patients to complete treatment without permanent grade 4 toxicity. Analysis of tumor immunosuppression factors in lymphocytes inside the tumor (TCR ζ and e chains, p56 lck , FAS, and FAS-ligand) confirmed that the immunologic potential of TIL, depressed at the time of metastasectomy, was significantly restored after in vitro culture with IL-2. Adoptive immunotherapy with TIL and IL-2 could improve DFS and OS, although further work is required to determine its role in the treatment of patients with high-risk melanoma.

TPS9105 Background: Preliminary evidence in the literature suggests that interferon receptor subunit IFNAR1 is down-regulated in melanoma cells harboring a mutated active BRAF. This possibility is ...

9065 Background: Ipilimumab was the first agent approved for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma that showed an overall survival benefit in randomised phase III trials. Early clinical studies explored the potential relationship between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with ipilimumab and antitumor activity but no definitive conclusion has been reached. Here, we evaluated the possible correlation between efficacy of ipilimumab treatment and irAEs in patients (pts) enrolled in the EAP in Italy. Methods: Ipilimumab was available upon physician request for pts aged ≥16 years with unresectable stage III/stage IV melanoma who had either failed systemic therapy or were intolerant to ≥1 systemic treatment and for whom no other therapeutic option was available. Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses. Tumour assessments were conducted at baseline and after completion of induction therapy using immune-related response criteria. Pts were monitored for adverse events (AEs), including immune-related AEs (irAEs), using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3.0. Results: In total, 855 Italian pts participated in the EAP from June 2010 to April 2012 across 55 centres. Among 833 evaluable pts, 278 pts (33.4%) reported an irAE and 555 (66.6%) did not. As of December 2012, the disease control rates among pts with or without irAEs were 35.3% and 33.9% respectively. We noted that there was a difference in the distribution of pts with or without irAEs among pts who experienced a fast progression, thus not being able to receive at least 3 cycles, and pts with slow progression. In fact, due to the mechanism of action of the drug and consequent delayed onset of irAEs, pts with irAEs among fast and slow progressors were 22% and 37% respectively. Therefore, median overall survival was evaluated by adjusting the 2 groups for this factor and results showed a comparable survival between pts who reported an irAE and pts who did not (10.0 vs 9.7 months respectively). Conclusions: This exploratory analysis of EAP data suggest that activity and efficacy of ipilimumab is not related with the occurrence of irAEs.

e20028 Background: Adjuvant high-dose interferon (HDI) treatment of patients (pts) with malignant melanoma (MM) consists of 4 weeks intravenous (IV) induction with 20 MU/m² interferon (IFN) alpha 2b followed by 11 months of 10 Mio IU/m² IFN subcutaneously (sc). It is unclear whether both parts of the regimen are mandatory for the efficacy of HDI treatment. The adjuvant phase III trials DeCOG MM-ADJ-5 and the Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI) trial evaluated intermittent IV HDI (iHDI) regimens as compared to standard HDI. In both trials, the experimental arm consisted of iHDI for 3 or 4 cycles, respectively. To gain more insight into the role of iHDI in the adjuvant setting we performed a pooled analysis of both trials. Methods: Based on the intent-to-treat populations, the German DeCOG trial contributed data on 627 MM pts. with stage III (AJCC 2002) resected intransit or lymph node metastasis. From the Italian IMI trial 330 pts. with stage III regional lymph node metastasis excluding intransit metastasis were evaluable. We performed a combined analysis with respect to relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), and toxicity using Cox regression models. Results: Median follow-up was 4.6 years in the DeCOG trial and 7.2 years in the IMI trial. There were 320 relapses in the DeCOG trial (51%) and 179 relapses in the IMI trial (54%) resulting in a combined hazard ratio (HR) for RFS of 1.11 (95% CI 0.93; 1.33) comparing iHDI vs.conventional HDI. OS was similar for iHDI vs. conventional HDI (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.84; 1.29). There was no significant heterogeneity comparing different substages (IIIA vs. IIIB vs. IIIC) or ulcerated versus non-ulcerated primary tumors. In both studies more patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity or impairment of quality of life with conventional HDI as compared to iHDI (DeCOG: 31.0% vs. 16.7%; IMI: 31.2% vs. 23.8%). Conclusions: The pooled analysis of the two pulsed adjuvant HDI treatments showed no significant differences for RFS or OS as compared to conventional HDI. There is a favorable safety profile and less overall toxicity in the pulsed regimens.

8529 Background: Patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM) often develop treatment-resistant brain metastases (mets). Treatment includes fotemustine (FTM), which crosses the blood-brain barrier. Ipilimumab (ipi) has shown activity in pts with MM and asymptomatic brain mets (Heller et al. ASCO 2011; abs 8581). In the phase II NIBIT-M1 trial, MM pts with asymptomatic brain mets were eligible for treatment with ipi plus FTM. Here, data from this pt subset are reported. Methods: Eligible pts received induction therapy with ipi 10 mg/kg every 3 wks (Q3W) x4 and FTM 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 wks, followed by ipi Q12W from Week (W) 24 and FTM Q3W from W9. The primary objective was the immune-related (ir) disease control rate (irDCR: complete/partial response [CR/PR] or stable disease [SD] using the ir response criteria). Secondary objectives included ir objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS), and safety. Tumor assessments were performed Q8W from W12 to W36 and Q12W thereafter. Results: Among 86 enrolled pts, 20 had brain mets. Of these, 7 had prior whole brain radiotherapy (n=4) or radiosurgery (n=3). As of December 2011, the irDCR was 50% (10/20; 95% CI, 27.2–72.8%) with an irORR of 40% (95% CI, 19.1–63.9%: 2 CRs and 6 PRs). Pts with irDC also had stability/reduction (n=5) or disappearance (n=5) of brain mets. Among pts with progressive disease, all but one had progression in the brain. With median follow-up of 8.3 months (range: 0.4–16.9), median irPFS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 0.7–12.3). The 1-year OS rate was 52.9% (95% CI, 26.6–79.2); median OS was not reached. Induction with ipi and FTM was completed by 55% and 85% pts, respectively. Grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60% pts; most commonly myelotoxicity (50%), increased ALT/AST (5%) and gastrointestinal (5%). AEs were generally manageable and reversible per protocol guidance. CNS AEs of any grade (i.e., haemorrhage, headache and seizure) occurred in 25% pts (grade 3/4 in 2 pts) and were attributed to disease progression. Conclusions: The combination of ipi plus FTM is active and safe in pts with MM and brain mets, regardless of prior treatment, and will be further explored in the phase III NIBIT-M2 trial.

TPS230 Background: CTLA-4 blockade by monoclonal antibodies (mAb) up-regulates host’s immune response(s) through the inhibition of negative signals delivered to T lymphocytes by the engagement with...

8591 Background: One recently developed strategy in treating patients with stage IV melanoma consists of dendritic cell (DC) vaccination. This therapy has variable results, based on patients’ immun...

8506 Background: High dose IFNalfa2b, according to the ECOG 1684 schedule, is the only approved adjuvant treatment for stage III melanoma. The risk/benefit profile has limited its use, while effica...

e13029 Background: Cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) able to kill tumor cells are efficiently induced by Dendritic Cells (DC); however, immunosuppressive factors, as CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ T lymphocytes (T-re...

Background: previous clinical studies demonstrated the safety, the immunological and anti-tumor activity of a newest chemo-immunotherapy regimen with gemcitabine + FOLFOX followed by sc. granulocyte-macrophage Colony stimulating Factor and low dose sc aldesleukine (GOLFIG regimen) in pretreated advanced colorectal carcinoma patients. This regimen was designed on translational bases to mimic in cancer patients, a successful protocol for the in vitro generation of tumor specific T cell lines. We therefore, designed a phase-III trial in advanced colon carcinoma patients to compare the anti-tumor efficacy of GOLFIG regimen with standard FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: GOLFIG/2 is a multicenter open label randomized phase-III trial. The study was designed on the hypothesis of a two months advantage of GOLFIG over FOLFOX-4 regimen in term of progression free survival (PFS). It was allowed an alpha and beta error of 0.05 (5%) and 0, 2 (80%), respectively. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio in the two arms. Patients enrolled in the control arm received standard FOLFOX-4 poly-chemotherapy, while those enrolled in the experimental arm, received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, day 1, 15); oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, day 2, 16); levo-folinate (100 mg/m2, days 1-2, 15-16), 5-FU (400 mg/m2 in bolus followed by 24 h infusion at 800 mg/m2, days 1-2, 15-16), sc. GM-CSF (100 µg, days 3-7); sc. aldesleukine (0.5 MIU bi-daily, days 8-14 and 17-30) day 1-15. One hundred thirty patients were enrolled between September 2005 and January 2010. The study was prematurely terminated because GOLFIG arm demonstrated a significantly longer PFS at the first preplanned interim analysis. Both FOLFOX-4 and GOLFIG regimens resulted safe, showing a similar range of adverse events mainly represented by grade I-II hematological toxicity, mucositis, and neurotoxicity. In the experimental arm, it was recorded a high frequency of aldesleukine-related fever, and self-limiting signs of autoimmunity in 16% of the patients. The GOLFIG regimen showed significant superiority over FOLFOX chemotherapy in term of response rate [59.3 (95%CI; 0.41-0.73) vs 34.4%, (95%CI; 0.28-0.59), P = 0.0001] and PFS [12.4 (95%CI- 9.3-15.6) vs 7.9 (95% CI 6.1-9.6) months; HR=0.64; P = 0.0105]. COX analysis indicated that performance status, autoimmunity, tumor infiltration by regulatory T cells (CD4+FoxP3+) and central memory T cells (CD8+CD45Ro-CCR7+) were independent predictive markers of favorable outcome. There was no correlation with either tumor site, histotype, grading, k-ras-mutational status or specific metastatic sites.Conclusion: the GOLFIG regimen is the first chemo-immunotherapy regimen which demonstrated efficacy in the frontline treatment of colorectal carcinoma. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5511. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5511

e19025 Background: MUP are estimated to comprise between 3.7% and 6% of all melanomas. It represents an interesting phenomenon not clearly explained yet and also its natural history is controversia...

TPS311 Background: Dendritic cells (DCs) play a central role in the induction of specific antigen recognition and tumor cell killing. Therapeutic vaccination with DCs is based on the potential for the in vitro cultivation and maturation of DC precursors from peripheral blood over a maximum of 7 days using GM-CSF and IL-4 in order to avoid the influence of immunosuppressive mechanisms present in tumor tissue. Among these, attention has recently focused on CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ T lymphocytes (T-regs). It has been seen that daily low-dose temozolomide (TMZ) induces lymphopenia, with a consequent reduction in T-regs (Su YB, J Clin Oncol, 2004). Furthermore, in a preliminary experience, we evaluated the expression of tumor endothelial marker 8 (TEM8) as a predictive marker of immunological and clinical response in mature DCs (mDCs) (Venanzi FM, Cancer Immunol Immunother, 2009). Following our experience of a vaccination trial using autologous mDCs pulsed with autologous tumor lysate (ATL) and keyhole limpet hemocyani...

e19591 Background: Chronic cancer pain (CCP) is present in 50% of cancer patients at any stage of disease and in 70% of those in an advanced setting. Preliminary results have shown the effectivenes...