Search

PURPOSE CheckMate 651 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02741570 ) evaluated first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus EXTREME (cetuximab plus cisplatin/carboplatin plus fluorouracil ≤ six cycles, then cetuximab maintenance) in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). METHODS Patients without prior systemic therapy for R/M SCCHN were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab or EXTREME. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) in the all randomly assigned and programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 20 populations. Secondary end points included OS in the programmed death-ligand 1 CPS ≥ 1 population, and progression-free survival, objective response rate, and duration of response in the all randomly assigned and CPS ≥ 20 populations. RESULTS Among 947 patients randomly assigned, 38.3% had CPS ≥ 20. There were no statistically significant differences in OS with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus EXTREME in the all randomly assigned (median: 13.9 v 13.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 97.9% CI, 0.80 to 1.13; P = .4951) and CPS ≥ 20 (median: 17.6 v 14.6 months; HR, 0.78; 97.51% CI, 0.59 to 1.03; P = .0469) populations. In patients with CPS ≥ 1, the median OS was 15.7 versus 13.2 months (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.97). Among patients with CPS ≥ 20, the median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) versus 7.0 months (EXTREME), objective response rate was 34.1% versus 36.0%, and median duration of response was 32.6 versus 7.0 months. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 28.2% of patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 70.7% treated with EXTREME. CONCLUSION CheckMate 651 did not meet its primary end points of OS in the all randomly assigned or CPS ≥ 20 populations. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed a favorable safety profile compared with EXTREME. There continues to be a need for new therapies in patients with R/M SCCHN.

We performed an integrated biomarker evaluation in pembrolizumab-treated patients with R/M HNSCC enrolled in KEYNOTE-012 or KEYNOTE-055. The relationship between biomarkers and HPV status was explored.We evaluated PD-L1 (combined positive score [CPS]), TMB, T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (TcellTwo hundred and fifty-seven patients (KEYNOTE-012, n = 106; KEYNOTE-055, n = 151) had TMB data available; of these, 254 had PD-L1 and 236 had TcellTMB and the inflammatory biomarkers PD-L1 and Tcell

PURPOSEMutations in the HRAS (m HRAS) proto-oncogene occur in 4%-8% of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Tipifarnib is a farnesyltransferase inhibitor that disrupts HRAS function. We evaluated the efficacy of tipifarnib in patients with R/M m HRAS HNSCC.METHODSWe enrolled 30 patients with R/M HNSCC in a single-arm, open-label phase II trial of tipifarnib for m HRAS malignancies; one additional patient was treated on an expanded access program. After an ad hoc analysis of the first 16 patients with HNSCC with m HRAS variant allele frequency (VAF) data, enrollment was limited to those with a m HRAS VAF of ≥ 20% (high VAF). The primary end point was objective response rate. Secondary end points included assessing safety and tolerability. Patients received tipifarnib 600 or 900 mg orally twice daily on days 1-7 and 15-21 of 28-day cycles.RESULTSOf the 22 patients with HNSCC with high VAF, 20 were evaluable for response at the time of data cutoff. Objective response rate for evaluable patients with high-VAF HNSCC was 55% (95% CI, 31.5 to 76.9). Median progression-free survival on tipifarnib was 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 16.4) versus 3.6 months (95% CI, 1.3 to 5.2) on last prior therapy. Median overall survival was 15.4 months (95% CI, 7.0 to 29.7). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events among the 30 patients with HNSCC were anemia (37%) and lymphopenia (13%).CONCLUSIONTipifarnib demonstrated encouraging efficacy in patients with R/M HNSCC with HRAS mutations for whom limited therapeutic options exist ( NCT02383927 ).

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown clinical benefit in many types of metastatic cancers with only a few predictive biomarkers identified so far. CDKN2A is commonly altered in human cancers, but prior studies have provided conflicting evidence regarding the association between CDKN2A genomic alterations (GA) and response to ICIs. Herein, we examined the impact of loss-of-function CDKN2A alterations on response and survival in patients treated with ICIs. Experimental Design: We studied the association between loss-of-function CDKN2A alterations and the response to ICIs in two independent cohorts of six different cancer types. Seven hundred and eighty-nine patients treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI; Boston, MA) and 1,250 patients treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC; New York, NY) were included in the final analysis. Patients' tumors were sequenced using Oncopanel or MSK-IMPACT. RNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and IMvigor210 were used to investigate differences in the tumor microenvironment. Results: In the DFCI cohort, CDKN2A GAs were associated with poor response and survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with ICIs, but not those treated with platinum-based therapy. Similarly, CDKN2A GAs were associated with worse outcomes in the MSKCC urothelial carcinoma cohort treated with ICIs. There was no association of CDKN2A status with ICI treatment outcome in five other cancers: esophagogastric, head and neck, non–small cell lung, renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Immuno-inflammatory pathways were significantly reduced in expression in CDKN2A-altered tumors. Conclusions: Our data show that CDKN2A GAs were associated with reduced benefit from ICI therapy in urothelial carcinoma as well as changes in the tumor–immune microenvironment.

Prior data have variably implicated the inactivation of the mammalian SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (mSWI/SNF) complex with increased tumor sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Herein, we examined the association between mSWI/SNF variants and clinical outcomes to ICIs. We correlated somatic loss-of-function (LOF) variants in a predefined set of mSWI/SNF genes (ARID1A, ARID1B, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, PBRM1, and ARID2) with clinical outcomes in patients with cancer treated with systemic ICIs. We identified 676 patients from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI, Boston, MA) and 848 patients from a publicly available database from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC, New York, NY) who met the inclusion criteria. Multivariable analyses were conducted and adjusted for available baseline factors and tumor mutational burden. Median follow-up was 19.6 (17.6–22.0) months and 28.0 (25.0–29.0) months for the DFCI and MSKCC cohorts, respectively. Seven solid tumor subtypes were examined. In the DFCI cohort, LOF variants of mSWI/SNF did not predict improved overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), or disease control rate. Only patients with renal cell carcinoma with mSWI/SNF LOF showed significantly improved OS and TTF with adjusted HRs (95% confidence interval) of 0.33 (0.16–0.7) and 0.49 (0.27–0.88), respectively, and this was mostly driven by PRBM1. In the MSKCC cohort, where only OS was captured, LOF mSWI/SNF did not correlate with improved outcomes across any tumor subtype. We did not find a consistent association between mSWI/SNF LOF variants and improved clinical outcomes to ICIs, suggesting that mSWI/SNF variants should not be considered as biomarkers of response to ICIs.

Background Although high-grade salivary gland cancers (SGCs) often express androgen receptor (AR) and/or HER-2/neu, therapeutically targeting these receptors in SGC remains investigational. We investigated the prevalence of receptor expression and the benefit of adjuvant HER-2 directed therapy in the high-risk postoperative setting and explored the clinical utility of sequentially targeting these receptors in the setting of advanced disease. Materials and Methods We clinically annotated 95 patients with SGC (excluding adenoid cystic carcinoma) treated at our institution from 2002 to 2019 and recorded AR, HER-2/neu status, and tumor genomic profiling results when available. Clinicopathologic information was then integrated with outcomes. Results Of 95 patients, most had high-risk histologies, with salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) as the most frequent diagnosis (43, 45%). Thirty-five (37%) experienced recurrence (51% SDC). HER-2/neu was positive (1–3+) by immunostaining in 34 of 52 (65%) evaluable cases. There was no difference in survival based on HER-2/neu or AR expression. Nine of 17 (53%) patients with HER-2+ SDC received adjuvant chemoradiation with trastuzumab. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were longer among patients with HER-2/neu 3+ staining tumors who received adjuvant trastuzumab versus those who did not (DFS, 117 vs. 9 months; p = .02; OS, 74 vs. 43 months; p = .02), with no difference among other HER-2/neu subgroups (0–2+). Two of nine (22%) patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab demonstrated recurrence, both with low HER-2/neu staining intensity (1+). Longer time to recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.94; p = .01) predicted improved outcomes. Both androgen deprivation and HER-2-directed therapies had clinical benefit beyond the first-line metastatic setting, with partial response observed beyond second-line use. Conclusion Although prospective data are lacking, the use of adjuvant trastuzumab in high-risk patients with SGC appears beneficial, particularly among patients with tumors exhibiting HER-2/neu 3+ immunostaining. Implications for Practice Results of this study showed an improved disease-free and overall survival in patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab for high-risk salivary gland cancers with strong HER-2/neu staining intensity. Following recurrence or metastatic spread, sequential HER-2, and androgen-directed therapies may benefit certain patients with salivary gland cancer.

BackgroundTo characterize genomic determinants of response to pembrolizumab in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in the KEYNOTE-012 study.MethodsAssociations between biomarkers (tumor mutational burden (TMB), neoantigen load (NL), 18-gene T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (TcellinfGEP), and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS)) and clinical outcomes with pembrolizumab were assessed in patients with R/M HNSCC (n=192). Tumor human papillomavirus (HPV) status was also evaluated with the use of p16 immunohistochemistry and whole exome sequencing (WES; HPV+, mapping >20 HPV reads) in pretreatment tumor samples (n=106).ResultsTMB, clonality-weighted TMB, and TcellinfGEP were significantly associated with objective response (p=0.0276, p=0.0201, and p=0.006, respectively), and a positive trend was observed between NL and PD-L1 CPS and clinical response (p=0.0550 and p=0.0682, respectively). No correlation was observed between TMB and TcellinfGEP (Spearman ρ=–0.026) or TMB and PD-L1 (Spearman ρ=0.009); a correlation was observed between TcellinfGEP and PD-L1 (Spearman ρ=0.511). HPV status by WES and p16 immunohistochemistry showed concordance (84% ҡ=0.573) among patients whose HPV results were available using both methods.ConclusionsTMB and inflammatory biomarkers (TcellinfGEP and PD-L1) may represent distinct and complementary biomarkers predicting response to anti-programmed death 1 therapies in HNSCC; further study of these relationships in randomized clinical trials is needed.Trial registration numberNCT01848834.

BACKGROUND Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with radiation therapy (RT) are at risk for jaw osteoradionecrosis (ORN), which is largely characterized by the presence of exposed necrotic bone. This report describes the incidence and clinical course of and risk factors for exposed intraoral bone in the multicenter Observational Study of Dental Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Patients (OraRad) cohort. METHODS Participants were evaluated before RT and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after RT. Exposed bone was characterized by location, sequestrum formation, and other associated features. The radiation dose to the affected area was determined, and the history of treatment for exposed bone was recorded. RESULTS The study enrolled 572 participants; 35 (6.1%) were diagnosed with incident exposed bone at 6 (47% of reports), 12 (24%), 18 (20%), and 24 months (8%), with 60% being sequestrum and with 7 cases (20%) persisting for >6 months. The average maximum RT dose to the affected area of exposed bone was 5456 cGy (SD, 1768 cGy); the most frequent associated primary RT sites were the oropharynx (42.9%) and oral cavity (31.4%), and 76% of episodes occurred in the mandible. The diagnosis of ORN was confirmed in 18 participants for an incidence rate of 3.1% (18 of 572). Risk factors included pre-RT extractions (P = .008), a higher RT dose (P = .039), and tobacco use (P = .048). CONCLUSIONS The 2-year incidence of exposed bone in the OraRad cohort was 6.1%; the incidence of confirmed ORN was 3.1%. Exposed bone after RT for HNC is relatively uncommon and, in most cases, is a short-term complication, not a recurring or persistent one.

The immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab is US FDA approved for treatment of solid tumors with high tumor mutational burden (TMB-high; ≥10 variants/Mb). However, the extent to which TMB-high generalizes as an accurate biomarker in diverse patient populations is largely unknown. Using two clinical cohorts, we investigated the interplay between genetic ancestry, TMB, and tumor-only versus tumor-normal paired sequencing in solid tumors. TMB estimates from tumor-only panels substantially overclassified individuals into the clinically important TMB-high group due to germline contamination, and this bias was particularly pronounced in patients with Asian/African ancestry. Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with ICIs, those misclassified as TMB-high from tumor-only panels did not associate with improved outcomes. TMB-high was significantly associated with improved outcomes only in European ancestries and merits validation in non-European ancestry populations. Ancestry-aware tumor-only TMB calibration and ancestry-diverse biomarker studies are critical to ensure that existing disparities are not exacerbated in precision medicine.

Purpose: Surgery often represents the best chance for disease control in locoregionally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We investigated dual immune-checkpoint inhibition [anti–PD-1, nivolumab (N), and anti-KIR, lirilumab (L)] before and after salvage surgery to improve disease-free survival (DFS). Patients and Methods: In this phase II study, patients received N (240 mg) + L (240 mg) 7 to 21 days before surgery, followed by six cycles of adjuvant N + L. Primary endpoint was 1-year DFS; secondary endpoints were safety, pre-op radiologic response, and overall survival (OS). Correlatives included tumor sequencing, PD-L1 scoring, and immunoprofiling. Results: Among 28 patients, the median age was 66, 86% were smokers; primary site: 9 oral cavity, 9 oropharynx, and 10 larynx/hypopharynx; 96% had prior radiation. There were no delays to surgery. Grade 3+ adverse events: 11%. At the time of surgery, 96% had stable disease radiologically, one had progression. Pathologic response to N + L was observed in 43% (12/28): 4/28 (14%) major (tumor viability, TV ≤ 10%) and 8/28 (29%) partial (TV ≤ 50%). PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) at surgery was similar regardless of pathologic response (P = 0.71). Thirteen (46%) recurred (loco-regional = 10, distant = 3). Five of 28 (18%) had positive margins, 4 later recurred. At median follow-up of 22.8 months, 1-year DFS was 55.2% (95% CI, 34.8–71.7) and 1-year OS was 85.7% (95% CI, 66.3–94.4). Two-year DFS and OS were 64% and 80% among pathologic responders. Conclusions: (Neo)adjuvant N + L was well tolerated, with a 43% pathologic response rate. We observed favorable DFS and excellent 2-year OS among high-risk, previously treated patients exhibiting a pathologic response. Further evaluation of this strategy is warranted.

Purpose: Cetuximab, which modulates immune responses, may affect the efficacy of subsequent immunotherapy. Here, we assessed outcomes with nivolumab, by prior cetuximab exposure, in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who had experienced progression within 6 months of platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: In the randomized, open-label, phase III CheckMate 141 trial, patients were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or investigator's choice (IC) of single-agent chemotherapy, with stratification by prior cetuximab exposure. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); additional endpoints were progression-free survival, objective response rate, and safety. Results: In patients with prior cetuximab exposure, the median OS was 7.1 months with nivolumab versus 5.1 months with IC (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.62–1.15); OS benefit with nivolumab was maintained across most demographic subgroups. In patients without prior cetuximab exposure, the median OS was 8.2 months with nivolumab versus 4.9 months with IC (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35–0.77); OS benefit with nivolumab was maintained across patient baseline subgroups including tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ( Conclusions: Nivolumab appeared to improve efficacy versus IC regardless of prior cetuximab use, supporting its use in patients with R/M SCCHN with or without prior cetuximab exposure. The reduction in risk of death with nivolumab compared with IC was greater in patients without prior cetuximab exposure versus with prior cetuximab exposure.

Aims The activity that the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cemiplimab has recently demonstrated has led to a paradigm shift in the management of patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). To identify predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs in advanced cSCC, we studied 33 patients who received ICI therapy at the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (DF/HCC) and analysed sequencing data for a subset of these patients. Methods We collected clinical data using electronic health records and genomic data using the institutional OncoPanel platform of the DF/HCC. We compared tumour genomics with data from previously sequenced cSCC cohorts. Results We observed high tumour mutational burden regardless of smoking status and response to ICI and longer median overall survival among those patients who achieved an ICI response. We compared the genetic data from our cohort with data from other cohorts that included fewer patients with distant metastatic disease. Although our cohort had a similar genetic landscape to those of comparator cohorts, mutations in PIK3C2B were more common in our study. In our cohort, copy number alterations (CNAs) in the 3q chromosomal arm appeared to predict response to ICI therapy. Conclusion CNAs in the 21–27 bands of chromosome arm 3q, a region that includes PIK3CA, ETV5 and BCL6, may represent predictors of response to ICI and may be candidates for drug targeting in combination or sequence with ICI agents.

Большой прогресс в лечении распространенного медуллярного рака щитовидной железы за последние 5 лет достигнут благодаря одобрению 2 препаратов – вандетаниба и кабозантиниба. Действие этих ингибиторов протеинкиназ во многом совпадает и направлено на различные мишени, участвующие в патогенезе медуллярного рака щитовидной железы. Оба препарата имеют достаточно широкий ряд токсических побочных эффектов, таких как артериальная гипертензия, кровотечения, перфорация кишечника, диарея и другие нежелательные явления со стороны желудочно-кишечного тракта, поражения кожи и гипотиреоз. Кроме того, вандетаниб может вызывать удлинение интервала QT из-за взаимодействия с калиевыми ионными каналами клеток миокарда, а кабозантиниб – ладонно-подошвенный синдром. Связанные с лечением токсические эффекты возникают достаточно часто, могут быть очень тяжелыми и даже опасными для жизни. Следовательно, пациенты, получающие эти препараты в течение длительного времени, имеют весьма высокий риск развития побочных эффектов. В данной статье даны практические рекомендации по лечению побочных эффектов применения вандетаниба и кабозантиниба. Рекомендуемый нами подход основан на раннем выявлении побочных эффектов и их своевременном лечении на фоне прерывания терапии ингибиторами протеинкиназ или снижения их дозы, чтобы обеспечить как можно более длительное применение максимально допустимой для конкретного пациента дозы препарата и предотвратить ухудшение качества его жизни. На сегодняшний день отсутствуют рекомендации по выбору очередности применения вандетаниба и кабозантиниба, однако большинство пациентов получают оба эти препарата. Выбор терапии 1-й линии следует проводить в индивидуальном порядке после тщательной оценки потенциальных рисков и пользы. Часто этот выбор зависит от предпочтений врача и особенностей пациента, например наличия сопутствующих заболеваний. Поскольку многие специалисты могут быть незнакомы с тонкостями применения таких препаратов, как вандетаниб и кабозантиниб, мы рекомендуем проводить лечение пациентов с медуллярным раком щитовидной железы под контролем опытного, хорошо осведомленного специалиста, а также мультидисциплинарной бригады врачей.

Purpose: Outcomes for patients with recurrent, incurable or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) refractory to platinum and immunotherapy are poor. Cellular therapies are emerging treatments with potential utility in epithelial cancers. This proof-of-concept trial investigates an allogeneic cytokine-induced, memory-like (CIML) NK cell infusion with IL-15 superagonist (sa) after lymphodepleting (LD) chemotherapy in advanced SCCHN. Patients and methods: This phase 1 single-center trial enrolled patients (pts) with R/M SCCHN regardless of human papillomavirus (HPV) status who had prior platinum and immunotherapy. Pts received LD fludarabine (25 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/m2/kg) on days -6 to -2 prior to haploidentical CIML NK cell infusion on day 0 (5-10 x 106 viable cells/kg=dose level 0) followed by N-803 (IL-15sa, 15 mcg/kg subcutaneously) starting on day +1 every 21-days for 4-doses. Part 1 treated 3 pts at dose level 0; Results: From 9/8/20 to 9/7/21, 6 pts enrolled to Part 1. One DLT was observed at dose level 0. Among 6 pts, median age: 59; 5/6 (83%) were men; 5/6 (83%) had oropharyngeal primaries (4 HPV+) with a median 6 prior lines of therapy for R/M disease (range: 4-8). R/M disease sites: lung, bone, skin, liver. 5/6 (83%) had offspring donors. Grade (G) 3-4 hematologic adverse events were common (6/6, 100%). One patient died of G5 febrile neutropenia and infection. Median days hospitalized: 14 (range: 9-37). Mild cytokine release syndrome was observed in 5/6 (83%) (median peak ferritin: 2248, CRP: 168); 3/5 required anti-IL6 therapy; no neurotoxicity was noted. There were no dose adjustments or discontinuation of therapy. One (17%) partial response (PR) was observed lasting 6.5 months; 4 (67%) pts had stable disease (SD), and 1 (17%) had progression. Tumor regression was observed in 3/6 (50%) pts at day +30. At a median follow-up of 9.5 months, median PFS: 3.4 months (95%CI 2.6-6.5); median OS: 4.7 months (95%CI 3.4-11.8). CIML NK cells showed large expansion in the peripheral blood (PB) at day +7 in all pts; mean increase: 66% (6-fold; standard deviation [SD] 10.5), to constitute 80% (SD 12.1) of PB lymphocytes. In pts with tumor regression at day +30 compared to those without, the % of PB NK cells remained high at day +28 (mean: 78 vs. 11%). PB NK cells remained >50% at day +42 in the pt with a PR. Conclusion: Allogeneic CIML NK cells can induce tumor regression associated with persistent CIML NK cell expansion among advanced SCCHN pts. In Part 1 we demonstrate safety and feasibility with the expected risks of LD conditioning. These findings have important implications for the development of cellular therapies in solid tumors. Citation Format: Glenn J. Hanna, Kimberly Coleman, Grace Birch, Robert A. Redd, Alejandro Alonso, Samantha Bednarz, Heather Daley, Diego E. Hernandez Rodriguez, Kit L. Shaw, Robert I. Haddad, Ravindra Uppaluri, Jerome Ritz, Sarah Nikiforow, Robert J. Soiffer, Rizwan Romee. A phase 1 trial of cytokine-induced memory-like (CIML) natural killer (NK) cell therapy with IL-15 superagonist in advanced head and neck cancer: Part 1 results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT540.

2622 Background: We previously showed that CDKN2A genomic alterations (GAs) are associated with resistance to ICI (Adib E, Clinical Cancer Research, 2021). The majority of such GAs are homozygous deletions, which commonly (̃50-80%) include MTAP, located 100kb telomeric of CDKN2A. MTAP loss leads to 5′-deoxy-5′-methylthioadenosine (MTA) accumulation and immunosuppressive effects in tumors. We examined combined CDKN2A/MTAP deletion vs. CDKN2A deletion/mutation alone as predictors of poor ICI response. Methods: We curated clinical data for cancer patients (pts) treated with ICI at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute through 6/2021, who had targeted panel sequencing. Inclusion criteria were: ICI in metastatic setting, ≥2 cycles, no concurrent systemic therapy, cancer type with > 50 pts treated. CDKN2A/ MTAP GAs were defined as a deep deletion affecting both genes; CDKN2A only GAs included both homozygous deletions and truncating mutations. Hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) were derived using multivariable Cox regression, adjusted for prior lines of therapy, treatment type (single vs. combination ICI), tumor mutational burden and ECOG PS. We also used a machine learning approach to quantify the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in digital whole-slide H&E images of 144 melanoma pts with available genomic data. Results: 921 pts with 6 cancer types were studied: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n = 366), melanoma (mel, n = 228), urothelial carcinoma (UC, n = 120), esophagogastric carcinoma (EGC,n = 90), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC, n = 58), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC, n = 59). UC pts with MTAP/ CDKN2A GAs had shorter OS and TTF than pts without GA in either gene (OS HR = 1.9[1.1-3.4], p = 0.005; TTF HR = 1.8[1.0-3.1], p = 0.0016) after adjusting for covariates. Similar results were seen for melanoma (OS HR = 2.5[1.4-2.6],p = 0.00065; TTF HR = 1.9[1.1-3.2],p = 0.018). There was no significant difference between pts with CDKN2A GA only and those without GA in either gene for OS or TTF in either UC or melanoma. CDKN2A/MTAP status was not associated with significantly shorter survival for NSCLC and EGC; while the analysis was confounded by HPV events for HNSCC, and underpowered for RCC. ML-based analysis of digital slides for melanoma, showed that tumors with CDKN2A GAs only (n = 42) had similar median density of TILs compared to tumors without GAs in either gene (n = 84; 920 vs. 943 TILs/mm2; p = 0.42). In contrast, tumors with co-occurring CDKN2A/ MTAP GAs had lower TIL density (529 TIL/mm2, n = 17 vs. 925 TIL/mm2, n = 126 (pooled); p = 0.018, Wilcoxon rank sum). Conclusions: In this study, we showed that co-occurrence of MTAP/CDKN2A GAs, but not CDKN2A GA only, was associated with worse outcomes in pts with UC and melanoma treated with ICI. Lower TIL density was also seen in melanoma tissue samples with combined MTAP/CDKN2A GA.

Introduction Patients with lung cancer (LC) are susceptible to severe outcomes from COVID-19. This study evaluated disruption to care of patients with LC during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods The COVID-19 and Cancer Outcomes Study (CCOS) is a prospective cohort study comprised of patients with a current or past history of hematological or solid malignancies with outpatient visits between March 2 and March 6, 2020, at two academic cancer centers in the Northeastern United States (US). Data was collected for the three months prior to the index week (baseline period) and the following three months (pandemic period). Results 313 of 2365 patients had LC, 1578 had other solid tumors, and 474 had hematological malignancies. Patients with LC were not at increased risk of COVID-19 diagnosis compared to patients with other solid or hematological malignancies. When comparing data from the pandemic period to the baseline period, patients with LC were more likely to have a decrease in in-person visits compared to patients with other solid tumors (aOR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.46–2.58), but without an increase in telehealth visits (aOR 1.13; 95% CI 0.85–1.50). Patients with LC were more likely to experience pandemic-related treatment delays than patients with other solid tumors (aOR 1.80; 95% CI 1.13–2.80) and were more likely to experience imaging/diagnostic procedure delays than patients with other solid tumors (aOR 2.59; 95% CI, 1.46–4.47) and hematological malignancies (aOR 2.01; 95% CI, 1.02–3.93). Among patients on systemic therapy, patients with LC were also at increased risk for decreased in-person visits and increased treatment delays compared to those with other solid tumors. Discussion Patients with LC experienced increased cancer care disruption compared to patients with other malignancies during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Focused efforts to ensure continuity of care for this patient population are warranted.

Purpose/objective(s) Automated tumor segmentation for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has the potential to improve treatment planning, response assessment, and clinical translation of imaging-based biomarkers. Deep learning has shown promise for cancer imaging segmentation, but performance for OPC tumors has been suboptimal with studies generally limited to small single-institution settings. In this study, we curated and harmonized multiple heterogeneous, multi-institutional datasets to develop and validate computed tomography (CT)-based, deep learning models for total gross tumor volume (GTV), primary (GTVp), and nodal (GTVn) segmentations. Materials/methods Data was obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) and included 1228 CT simulation scans from OPC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy collected from 2003-2014 from four institutions that included original gross tumor volumes (GTV) as delineated by the treating radiation oncologist. GTVs were manually reviewed and ground-truth labels were harmonized to include distinct GTVp and GTVn labels. Cases were split randomly, such that 70% of cases were used for model training, 15% for tuning, and 15% for independent performance testing. Utilizing a modified 3D UNET-based architecture, models were trained and tuned to predict total GTV, GTVp and GTVn. Model performance was assessed by measuring precision, recall, and dice score coefficient (DSC) when comparing deep learning-generated to ground truth volumes in the independent test set. Patients without contrast-enhanced CT were excluded from the GTVp model a priori, given the importance of contrast in delineating primary tumor. Results Algorithms' median performance on test sets with 95% confidence intervals. GTVp test set limited to contrast-enhanced scans. Within the total dataset (n = 1228), median age was 59, cases were 82% male, and HPV status was 49% positive, 16% negative, and 35% unknown. Tumor staging was 45% T3-4, 54% T1-T2, and 1% T0/X. Nodal staging was 75% N2-N3 and 25% N0-1. Overall, the GTVn model had the highest performance (median DSC: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.77), followed by total GTV (median DSC: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.73), and GTVp (median DSC 0.68; 95% CI: 0.63, 0.71). Conclusion Deep learning with multiple harmonized data sources can yield effective models for OPC primary and nodal segmentation using CT alone. The utility of these models will depend on the clinical use case and will be explored on further investigation, though current model performance metrics, particularly for nodal segmentation, are likely adequate for prospective testing in clinical and research applications.

Purpose/objective(s) Ablation of oligometastases (OM) has demonstrated benefit in specific histologies such as non-small cell lung and prostate cancer, among other tumor types. Although local ablation is often employed in the treatment of patients with metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), there are limited data as to the detection and management of OM in this disease. We aimed to characterize the natural history of OM in patients with ACC and identify predictors of long-term outcomes. Materials/methods We identified 42 patients with metastatic ACC treated with systemic and/or locally ablative therapy between 2001 and 2019. Locally ablative treatments included surgical resection, radiation therapy, and radiofrequency ablation. Systemic treatments included chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy. Imaging studies were retrospectively analyzed to identify patients with OM (1-5 lesions) at any point during their follow-up. Number of metastases and tumor burden (sum of all measurable lesions > 2 mm) was recorded at three timepoints: when metastases were first visualizable on imaging, confirmed by biopsy, and treated. Long-term outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results There was evidence of OM in 33/42 (79%) patients. A majority of these patients had OM to the lungs (82%) while fewer patients had OM to the bone (9%) and liver (6%). The median time between initial ACC diagnosis and earliest detection of metastasis was 13.1 months (range 0-298). At the time of earliest detection, 15 patients had a single lesion, 7 patients had 2 lesions, 6 patients had 3 lesions, 2 patients had 4 lesions, 3 patients had 5 lesions, and 9 patients had polymetastases (PM, 6+ lesions). Median overall survival (OS) for patients with a solitary metastasis on first visualization was 36.0 years, compared to 11.7, 11.5, and 8.5 years for those presenting with 2-3, 4-5, and 6+ metastases, indicating a significant association between number of metastases and OS (P = 0.04). 18 patients still had OM when they first received local or systemic treatment for metastatic disease, and had significantly improved OS compared to 24 patients treated for PM (36.0 years vs. 9.2 years, HR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14-0.89). Patients with OM who received earlier locally ablative treatment (median time from OM detection to local treatment 21.5 months) had improved OS (17.7 vs. 9.2 years, HR, 0.15; 95% CI 0.02-0.63). However, early systemic treatment of patients with OM did not impact survival. Conclusion A significant proportion of patients with ACC will experience an oligometastatic state in the natural history of their cancer, for whom earlier ablative therapy may improve survival outcomes. To build upon these findings, we have since developed a clinical trial to investigate the benefit of treating oligometastatic ACC with early initiation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Future studies are needed to determine the potential role of early treatment of OM in patients with ACC.

PURPOSE The aim of this joint guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other healthcare providers on definitive-intent chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage II-IVA nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) and ASCO convened an expert panel of radiation oncology, medical oncology, surgery, and advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2020. Outcomes of interest included survival, distant and locoregional disease control, and quality of life. Expert panel members used this evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. RESULTS The literature search identified 108 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Five overarching clinical questions were addressed, which included subquestions on radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy sequence, and concurrent, induction, and adjuvant chemotherapy options. RECOMMENDATIONS Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address aspects of care related to chemotherapy in combination with RT for the definitive-intent treatment of stage II to IVA NPC. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .

PURPOSE We conducted a post hoc analysis of the vandetanib phase III trial involving patients with advanced medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) to assess the efficacy and safety of vandetanib in patients with progressive and symptomatic MTC. The primary objective of the analysis was to determine progression-free survival (PFS) of these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients from the ZETA trial were divided into 4 disease severity subgroups: progression and symptoms, symptoms only, progression only, and no progression and no symptoms assessed at baseline. PFS, determined from objective tumor measurements performed by the local investigator, overall survival (OS), time to worsening of pain (TWP), and objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated. RESULTS Of the 331 patients in this trial, 184 had symptomatic and progressive disease at baseline. In this subgroup, results were similar in magnitude to those observed in the overall trial for PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.64; P < .0001), OS (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.61; P = .71), and TWP (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.04; P = .07), and the observed adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of vandetanib. In this subgroup, the ORR was 37% in the treatment arm versus 2% in the placebo arm. CONCLUSION Vandetanib demonstrated clinical benefit—specifically, increased PFS—in patients with symptomatic and progressive MTC.

Graphical abstract, Highlights • We note high 30-day all-cause mortality for HNC patients admitted with COVID-19. • ICU admission and residing in a LTC facility predicted poor outcomes. • Most deaths were in HNC survivors and not in those on active cancer therapy., Background The impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer is emerging, but data are urgently needed for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients or survivors who are inherently high-risk for severe illness and mortality with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods This multi-institution, academic cohort study collected comprehensive data on clinical risk factors, COVID-19 symptoms and viral testing patterns, information about hospitalization rates, and predictors of survival among HNC patients with active disease or in remission. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality from the date of confirmed COVID-19. We performed multivariate analysis to understand the prognostic value of clinical and laboratory parameters on outcomes. Results Thirty-two patients with COVID-19 and HNC were included. Median age was 70 (range: 38–91) with 38% aged 75+, and 34% resided in long-term care facilities (LTCF). Thirteen (41%) had active cancer, with 6 (19%) on cancer therapy within 4 weeks of COVID-19 diagnosis. New or worsening cough and fatigue were the most commonly reported presenting symptoms. More than 30% required >1 SARS-CoV-2 test before confirming a positive result. Twenty (63%) required hospitalization. At data cutoff, 7 (22%) had died (1 on active cancer treatment), with a 30-day all-cause mortality of 18.9% (95%CI: 11.4–33.6) among all patients, and 71.5% (95%CI: 38.2–92.3) among those requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. ICU admission and residing in a LTCF predicted worse outcomes (p

Purpose We evaluated the safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (pembro) ± radiation therapy (RT) in a phase 2 study among patients with progressive, metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Methods and Materials Eligible patients had metastatic ACC with progression within the last year and ≥1 measurable lesion. Patients were randomized to pembro alone or with RT to 30 Gy in 5 fractions (pembroRT). The primary endpoint was objective response rate outside the RT field. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and local RT responses. Results We randomized 20 patients (10 per arm) from 2017 to 2018. We did not observe objective response outside of the radiation treatment field; stable disease (SD) was the best response in 12 (60%) patients and was not different per arm (7 pembro, 5 pembroRT, P = .65). A tumor growth rate decrease (TGR) of >25% was noted among 7 of 12 patients and >75% in 4 patients. There were local responses in the irradiated field among all evaluable pembroRT patients. Median PFS and OS were 4.5/not reached for pembroRT and 6.6 / 27.2 months for pembro patients. One patient developed grade 3 liver enzyme elevation after 27 cycles of therapy. Correlative analyses confirm low levels of programmed death-ligand 1 expression (PD-L1), and CD8 infiltrating T-cells. We identified associations between local response and both MYB/NFIB translocation and PD-L1 expression and between changes in systemic immune populations and RT. Conclusions Pembrolizumab and pembroRT were well tolerated. We observed no objective responses, but 60% of patients with PD before the study achieved SD, the majority with decreased TGR and half (n = 10) with clinical benefit (SD >6 months). We observed favorable local responses within the RT field. Additional strategies are needed to further delay progression and effect response.

SUMMARYBackgroundPembrolizumab improved survival of patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aims of this phase 2 trial were to determine if pembrolizumab administered to patients with resectable locally advanced, human papillomavirus (HPV)-unrelated HNSCC would be safe, result in pathologic tumor response (pTR), and lower the relapse rate.MethodsNeoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered 2-3 weeks before surgery. Resection of the primary tumor and involved/at-risk nodes was performed. Post-operative (chemo) radiation was planned. Patients with high-risk pathology (positive margins and/or extranodal extension) were to receive adjuvant pembrolizumab. pTR was quantified as the proportion of the resection bed with tumor necrosis, keratinous debris, and giant cells/histiocytes: pTR-0 (NCT02296684), and is ongoing but closed to accrual.FindingsBetween June 30, 2015, and March 30, 2018, 36 patients enrolled. After neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, serious (grades 3-4) adverse events and unexpected surgical delays/complications did not occur. pTR-2 occurred in eight patients (22%), and pTR-1 in eight other patients (22%). pTR ≥10% correlated with baseline tumor PD-L1 expression, immune infiltrate, and IFN-γ pathway activity. Matched sample analysis showed compensatory upregulation of multiple immune inhibitory checkpoints in patients with pTR-0, and confirmed that clonal loss occurred in some patients. The one-year relapse rate among the eighteen patients with high-risk pathology was 16.7% (95%CI: 3.6-41.4%).ConclusionsAmong patients with locally advanced, HPV-unrelated HNSCC, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab was safe, and resulted in pTR-1 or pTR-2 in 44% of patients. The one-year relapse rate in patients with high-risk-pathology was lower than historical.FundingMerck, NCI, NIDCR, NHGRI and The V Foundation.

Nivolumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) vs investigator's choice (IC) of chemotherapy at the primary analysis of randomized, open-label, phase 3 CheckMate 141 in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Here, we report that OS benefit with nivolumab was maintained at a minimum follow-up of 11.4 months. Further, OS benefit with nivolumab vs IC was also noted among patients who received first-line treatment for R/M SCCHN after progressing on platinum therapy for locally advanced disease in the adjuvant or primary (i.e., with radiation) setting.

Background Second-line treatment options for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are limited. The phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 study evaluated the safety and the efficacy of pembrolizumab for the treatment of HNSCC after long-term follow-up. Methods Multi-centre, non-randomised trial included two HNSCC cohorts (initial and expansion) in which 192 patients were eligible. Patients received pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (initial cohort; N = 60) or 200 mg every 3 weeks (expansion cohort; N = 132). Co-primary endpoints were safety and overall response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1; central imaging vendor review). Results Median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.2–32). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade and grade 3/4 occurred in 123 (64%) and 24 (13%) patients, respectively. No deaths were attributed to treatment-related AEs. ORR was 18% (34/192; 95% CI, 13–24%). Median response duration was not reached (range, 2+ to 30+ months); 85% of responses lasted ≥6 months. Overall survival at 12 months was 38%. Conclusions Some patients received 2 years of treatment and the responses were ongoing for more than 30 months; the durable anti-tumour activity and tolerable safety profile, observed with long-term follow-up, support the use of pembrolizumab as a treatment for recurrent/metastatic HNSCC.

Purpose: Targeting mutations leading to PI3K/mTOR/Akt activation are of interest in thyroid cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of everolimus in aggressive, radioactive iodine–refractory (RAIR) thyroid cancer and correlated tumor mutational profiling with response. Exploratory medullary and anaplastic thyroid cancer cohorts were included. Experimental Design: This single-arm, multi-institutional phase II study was conducted from 2009 to 2013 in patients with incurable RAIR thyroid cancer who had radiographic progression six months prior to enrollment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with a median follow-up of 31.8 months. The study is closed to enrollment but treatment and follow-up are ongoing. A targeted next-generation sequencing platform was used for mutational analysis. Results: Thirty-three patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), 10 with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), and 7 with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) enrolled. For the DTC cohort, median PFS was 12.9 months (95% CI, 7.3–18.5) with a 2-year PFS of 23.6% (95% CI, 10.5–39.5). Median OS was not reached; 2-year OS was 73.5% (95% CI, 53.8–85.8). Among ATC patients, 1 had a partial response and was progression-free until 17.9 months after study entry and one had disease stability for 26 months, respectively. The genomically profiled cohort enriched for PI3K/mTOR/Akt alterations. PI3K/mTOR/Akt–mutated ATC subgroups appeared to benefit from everolimus. Treatment-related adverse events were as anticipated. Conclusions: Everolimus has significant antitumor activity in thyroid cancer. While genomic profiling does not currently guide therapeutic selection in thyroid cancer patients, these data have important implications when considering the use of an mTOR inhibitor in an era of precision medicine. Clin Cancer Res; 24(7); 1546–53. ©2018 AACR.

BackgroundThis study sought to determine the efficacy and safety profile of cabozantinib in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).Experimental DesignThis prospective, phase II, single-institution trial enrolled patients with platinum-failure, recurrent/metastatic MCC to receive cabozantinib 60 mg orally daily until disease progression, withdrawal from study, or severe toxicity. The primary endpoint was disease control rate. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Immunohistochemistry for VEGFR-2, MET, and HGF expression and next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue were performed and correlated with outcome.ResultsEight patients were accrued from January 24, 2014, to June 8, 2016. The study was closed prematurely because of toxicity and lack of responses. The most frequent adverse events were grades 1 and 2 and included anorexia, fatigue, nausea, hypothyroidism, and dysgeusia. Two patients developed nonhealing, painful ulcers and tumor-skin fistula. One patient had stable disease for 8 months. One patient withdrew from the study after 2 weeks of therapy because of adverse events. Three patients required dose reduction because of toxicity. Median PFS and OS were 2.1 and 11.2 months, respectively. No expression of MET, HGF, or VEGFR-2 was identified in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry of patients’ tissue samples.ConclusionCabozantinib was poorly tolerated and did not demonstrate activity in patients with recurrent/metastatic, platinum-failure MCC. It is unclear whether preselection of patients with the specific upregulation or genetic alteration in the targets for cabozantinib would have changed the results of this study. (Clinical trial identification number: NCT02036476)Implications for PracticeThis phase II study demonstrated poor tolerability and lack of activity of cabozantinib in an unselected group of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. Although it is unclear whether preselection of patients with the specific upregulation and genetic alterations in targets for cabozantinib would have changed the results of this study, this would have likely led to an extremely rare patient population that would take many years to accrue.

Purpose: Recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (R/M ACC) is a rare cancer often arising from the salivary glands of the head and neck. While effective therapies are lacking, preclinical models have suggested that retinoic acid agonists may inhibit ACC growth by blocking MYB binding at translocated gene enhancers. We conducted a phase II trial evaluating retinoic acid as a potential novel therapy for R/M ACC. Patients and methods: Patients with histologically confirmed R/M ACC of any primary site with measurable disease (RECIST v1.1), clinical or radiographic progression within 12 months prior to enrollment, and any number of prior lines of therapy were eligible. Cohort 1 (CH1) received ATRA 45 mg/m2 split oral daily dosing on days 1-14 of a 28-day cycle; cohort 2 (CH2) received the same dosing continuously; treatment continued until disease progression. The primary endpoint was best overall response: ≥5 patients in CH1 with disease in response (CR+PR) among N=25 (assuming ≥2 of N=14 accrued in first stage of a two-stage design had disease in response) provided 85% power to target a >10% response rate (one-sided 9% binomial test). Secondary endpoints: safety, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival. Exploratory analyses: ATRA impact on MYB expression, define resistance mechanisms, and monitor circulating tumor DNA. All had targeted tumor sequencing prior to enrollment. Results: Between 8/2019 and 2/2020, N=14 enrolled in stage 1 CH1. Primary endpoint of response to continue accrual into stage 2 in CH1 was not met; by 5/2020, N=4 enrolled in CH2 when the trial closed to accrual (budget constraints). Among 18 patients, median age: 58, 61% (11/18) women; each patient had a median of 3 organs (range, 1-4) with metastatic disease. 39% had 2+ prior lines of therapy. Best overall response: CR+PR 0%; SD 61% (11/18); PD 28% (5/18); unevaluable 11% (2/18). Median duration of stability 3.5 months (range, 1-12.3+). One patient (CH1) remains on drug with SD >1 year. Half of those who received prior VEGFR therapy achieved SD (4/8). At a median follow-up of 7.9 months, median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.9). N=1 required dose adjustment; N=1 came off drug for toxicity. There were no grade 3-4 adverse events (headache, dry skin were common); no deaths due to treatment. Median tumor mutational burden was 0 (range, 0-5). NOTCH1 was the most frequent alteration (4, 22%) with 2 evaluable NOTCH1-mutant patients exhibiting SD. Mutations in the PI3K pathway, TP53, and TERT promoter were common. Low MYB protein expression was associated with longer duration of stability (p Citation Format: Glenn J. Hanna, Anne O'Neill, Jennifer M. Cutler, Michelle Flynn, Tushara Vijaykumar, John R. Clark, Lori J. Wirth, Jochen H. Lorch, Jong C. Park, Jeffrey Mito, Jens G. Lohr, Jeffrey Kaufman, Leonard I. Zon, Robert I. Haddad. A phase II trial of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT165.

Objectives To characterize specific serious toxicities of reRT with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and identify treatment-related predictors of toxicity for patient counseling and decision-making. Materials/Methods 75 consecutive patients with recurrent or 2nd primary SCCHN received reRT from 8/2004-02/2013. All patients had prior definitive or postoperative RT. Objective endpoints of “serious toxicity” were defined as: hospitalization during reRT, tracheotomy after reRT, hemorrhage, soft tissue complication requiring operative intervention, or other CTCAE grade ≥4 toxicity. Results Patients received definitive (n = 41,55%) or postoperative (n = 34,45%) reRT (median dose 60 Gy, range 59.4–70 Gy). Most patients (88%) had concurrent chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 1.4 years, 39 (52%) patients had at least one serious toxicity: hospitalization during reRT (24%), surgically-managed soft tissue complication (19%), and/or urgent tracheotomy (18%). There were no grade 5 acute toxicities but there were 4 fatal hemorrhages (median 8.3 months) including 2 attributed to local-regional recurrence (LRR). Most patients (69%) had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube at last follow-up; those with a LRR had higher PEG tube-dependence rates (86% vs. 53%, p = 0.001). LRR, site of reRT, and laryngeal RT dose, were marginally associated with toxicity-risk. Conclusions Patients considering reRT should be counseled on the high rate of PEG tube-dependence, and events of urgent tracheotomy, hospitalization, hemorrhage, and operative intervention, which typically occur months after reRT completion. Further study of baseline patient function and cumulative radiation dose to the larynx and other organs-at-risk may improve estimates of serious toxicity-risk after reRT.

Background HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is increasing in incidence. Laboratory assays that identify virally-mediated disease and predict HPV clearance in OPSCC may have important prognostic implications. Objective Here we investigated serum, salivary HPV16 early (E) antibodies before and after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locoregionally advanced OPSCC. Methods We prospectively measured salivary, serum samples at the beginning of and 6-7 weeks following the completion of CRT in 44 patients. IgG antibodies targeting N- and C-terminal fragments of E2 (NE2, CE2), E6 and E7 were measured by programmable enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results We observed serum antibodies directed against HPV-associated E proteins in patients with HPV-associated OPSCC. E7 directed antibodies were detected in saliva in the majority of patients, and were associated with HPV status (p= 0.03). When analyzed longitudinally, median salivary E7 antibody levels decreased significantly post-treatment (p= 0.007). Conclusions Our results demonstrate the feasibility of measuring HPV16 E antibodies in saliva and serum. E7 antibodies, in particular, are more detectable in saliva as compared with other E protein antibodies. Measuring E7 salivary antibody levels at various time points may have utility in understanding HPV clearance and should be explored for their ability to predict the risk of recurrence.

BackgroundNUT midline carcinoma, renamed NUT carcinoma (NC), is an aggressive squamous cancer defined by rearrangement of the NUTM1 gene. Although a subset of patients can be cured, for the majority of patients the prognosis is grim. We sought to classify patients into risk groups based on molecular and clinicopathologic factors at the time of diagnosis.MethodsClinicopathologic variables and survival outcomes were extracted for a total of 141 NC patients from the NUT midline carcinoma Registry using questionnaires and medical records. Translocation type was identified by molecular analyses. Survival tree regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors associated with overall survival (OS).ResultsFor 141 patients, the median age at diagnosis was 23.6 years. Fifty-one percent had thoracic origin compared with 49% nonthoracic sites (41% head and neck, 6% bone or soft tissue, 1% other). The median OS was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.8 to 9.1 months). Most patients had the BRD4-NUTM1 fusion (78%), followed by BRD3-NUTM1 (15%) and NSD3-NUTM1 (6%). Survival tree regression identified three statistically distinct risk groups among 124 patients classified by anatomical site and genetics: group A is nonthoracic primary, BRD3-, or NSD3-NUT (n = 12, median OS = 36.5 months, 95% CI = 12.5 to not reported months); group B is nonthoracic primary, BRD4-NUT (n = 45, median OS = 10 months, 95% CI = 7 to 14.6 months); and group C is thoracic primary (n = 67, median OS = 4.4 months, 95% CI = 3.5 to 5.6 months). Only groups A and B had long-term (≥3 years, n = 12) survivors.ConclusionsWe identify three risk groups defined by anatomic site and NUT fusion type. Nonthoracic primary with non-BRD4-NUT fusion confers the best prognosis, followed by nonthoracic primary with BRD4-NUT. Thoracic NC patients, regardless of the NUT fusion, have the worst survival.

Treating head and neck cancer patients with systemic therapy is challenging because of tumor related, patient related and treatment related factors. In this review, we aim to summarize the current standard of care in the curative and palliative setting, and to describe best practice with regard to structural requirements, procedures, and monitoring outcome. Treatment advice for individual head and neck cancer patients is best discussed within a multidisciplinary team. Cisplatin is the drug of choice for concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the primary and postoperative setting, and also a main component of induction chemotherapy. However, acute and late toxicity is often significant. Checkpoint inhibitors have recently been proven to be active in the metastatic setting which has resulted in a shift of paradigm. Detailed knowledge, institution of preventive measures, early recognition, and prompt treatment of adverse events during systemic therapy is of paramount importance. Documentation of patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment details, and clinical and patient reported outcome is essential for monitoring the quality of care. Participation in initiatives for accreditation and registries for benchmarking institutional results are powerful incentives for implementation of best practice procedures.

Performance of commercially available human papillomavirus (HPV) assays (approved for cervical HPV detection) is unknown for detecting HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC). Assays for detection of HPV DNA [ELISA (DEIA) and Cobas], and RNA (Aptima) in oral rinse samples, and serum HPV oncogene antibodies were evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity of each test was explored among HPV-OPC cases and controls. Biomarker prevalence was evaluated among 294 “at-risk” people (screening) and 133 “high-risk” people [known to previously have oral oncogenic HPV (oncHPV) DNA and/or HPV16 E6/E7 antibodies detected]. HPV16 E6 antibodies had the best overall test performance with sensitivity of 88%, compared with oral HPV16 DNA sensitivity of 51% by DEIA and 43% by Cobas (each P < 0.001). Specificity was comparable in each of these tests (≥98%). When positivity for any oncHPV type was compared with HPV16 for the same test, sensitivity was comparable (60% vs. 51%, 40% vs. 43%, and 92% vs. 88% for DEIA, Cobas, and E6 antibodies, respectively), but specificity was reduced (93%–97%). Aptima had poor sensitivity (23%). Sensitivity decreased when cotesting HPV16 oral rinse DNA and E6 antibodies (37%–48%), or multiple E antibodies (69%–72%). HPV16 DNA were detected in ∼2% of the at-risk by either DEIA or Cobas and up to 15% of the high-risk population. HPV16 E6 seroprevalence was 2.3% and 2.4% in the at-risk and high-risk populations, respectively. Oral rinse HPV testing had moderate-to-poor sensitivity for HPV-OPC, suggesting many true positives would be missed in a potential screening scenario. HPV16 E6 serum antibody was the most promising biomarker evaluated.

Quantifying tumor DNA in tissue and circulating in blood permits high-quality molecular monitoring to detect and track cancer progression. Evaluating tumor DNA in both blood and saliva in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) could provide a non-invasive and clinically actionable method for real-time disease detection.We previously validated an ultrasensitive droplet-digital (dd)PCR assay targeting the dominant high-risk HPV subtypes causally linked to OPC. Here we enrolled an observational cohort to evaluate the predictive and prognostic potential of paired plasma-salivary tumor DNA among 21 patients with advanced HPV+OPC.In patients with recurrent, persistent locoregional (LR) disease, median baseline normalized salivary HPV DNA was 10.9 copies/ng total DNA, nearly 20x higher compared with those with distant disease only (p = 0.01). A cutoff of 5 copies/ng yielded 87% sensitivity and 67% specificity for accurately predicting LR disease. Total tumor burden among those with LR disease strongly correlated with salivary HPV DNA levels (R = 0.83, p = 0.02). The rise and fall of salivary HPV DNA predicted treatment failure and response, respectively, in all patients with LR disease, and predated imaging findings. Among paired salivary-plasma (cell-free) cfDNA samples, only higher plasma HPV cfDNA levels were associated with poor outcomes (p 0.01), suggesting that each bodily fluid provides unique information about HPV disease status.Salivary HPV DNA provides valuable information about tumor burden and predicts treatment response in advanced HPV+OPC. Paired blood-saliva samples could be used to monitor HPV DNA with broad applications to inform diagnosis, prognosis, and surveillance in HPV-associated diseases.

Purpose To determine the maximum tolerated dose and tolerability of (1) afatinib in combination with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for patients with intermediate-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and (2) afatinib in combination with PORT and weekly docetaxel for high-risk SCCHN. Methods and Materials An open-label, multicenter, 2-cohort, phase 1 dose-escalation trial was conducted using a 3 + 3 design. Eligible patients had definitive surgery for SCCHN, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx and had intermediate- or high-risk pathologic features. Afatinib was given for a 1-week lead in before PORT and daily during 6 to 6.5 weeks of PORT with or without weekly docetaxel. The starting dose was 30 mg and could be escalated to 40 mg or de-escalated to 20 mg. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of afatinib with PORT or PORT + docetaxel. Results Between April 2013 and November 2017, 27 patients were enrolled and started study treatment, including 16 intermediate-risk patients and 11 high-risk patients, all with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Most patients (n = 25) had oral cavity cancer and were treated to a median total dose of 60 Gy in the intermediate-risk arm and 65 Gy in the high-risk arm. There was 1 grade 4 event, but no deaths. The maximum tolerated dose was not established owing to dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in both arms. In the high-risk arm, DLTs were grade 3 mucositis (n = 3) and grade 3 diarrhea/hypokalemia (n = 1). In the intermediate-risk arm, DLTs were grade 3 mucositis (n = 4) and grade 3 diarrhea (n = 2). Conclusions Afatinib in combination with PORT for mucosal SCCHN was difficult to tolerate because of grade 3 toxicity, mostly mucositis, in a cohort of patients requiring high-dose PORT to the oral cavity. This regimen may be better tolerated for a non-oral cavity site or if given in a different schedule.

Objectives: Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) can experience severe symptom burden and/or difficulty swallowing, leading to problems with treatment adherence/administration. In LUXHead and Neck 1 (LH & N1; NCT01345682), second-line afatinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus methotrexate in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. We report adherence and safety across pre-specified and additional subgroups potentially linked to afatinib PFS benefit in LH&N1 (p16 status, smoking history), and afatinib adherence, safety and efficacy by administration (oral versus feeding tube; post-hoc analysis). Methods: Patients were randomized (2:1) to afatinib (40 mg/day) or intravenous methotrexate (40 mg/m(2)/ week). Results: Among 320 afatinib-treated and 160 methotrexate-treated patients, 83-92% and 76-92% (of patients with data available) across all subgroups took >= 80% of treatment. Across p16 status and smoking history subgroups, the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (70-91%), rash/acne (72-84%), stomatitis (34-73%) with afatinib; and included stomatitis (39-100%), fatigue (22-50%), nausea (19-36%) with methotrexate. Dose reduction decreased AE incidence/severity. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between oral/feeding tube (n = 276/n = 46) groups. 89%/89% (of patients with data available) took >= 80% of assigned afatinib. Median PFS was 2.6 versus 2.7 months (hazard ratio: 0.997; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.38). The most common afatinib-related AEs were: rash/acne (74% versus 74%), diarrhea (73% versus 65%), stomatitis (40% versus 30%). Conclusion: Subgroup analyses of LH&N1 demonstrate that afatinib has predictable and manageable safety across patient subgroups, with high treatment adherence, and is effective via oral and feeding tube administration.

Background Treatment options are limited for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We report results from a phase II study of CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in advanced NPC. Patients and methods Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NPC and 1–2 prior treatment regimens received CC-486 300 mg daily on days 1–14 of 21-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The first 6 patients of Asian-Pacific Islander (API) ethnicity received a reduced dose of 200 mg to preserve safety and tolerability; if well tolerated, subsequent API patients received CC-486 300 mg. The study could advance to stage 2 if > 4 patients achieved a response. Co-primary end-points were overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (independent review). Key secondary end-points were overall survival and safety. Results Owing to faster-than-anticipated enrolment, 36 patients, including 13 of API ethnicity, were enrolled; the median age was 54.0 years. Most patients were male (81%) and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1 (97%). Among 25 efficacy-evaluable patients, the ORR was 12%; the median progression-free and overall survival were 4.7 and 18.0 months, respectively. The most common grade III/IV treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (33%) and febrile neutropenia (11%). Twenty-one posttreatment deaths, primarily due to progressive disease or disease complications, and 1 on-treatment death (epistaxis, unrelated to study drug) occurred. The study did not advance to stage 2. Conclusion CC-486 did not show sufficient clinical activity to support further development as monotherapy in this patient population. The safety profile of CC-486 in NPC was consistent with that in other solid tumours.

TPS6087 Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) accounts for more than 830,000 new cancer cases each year worldwide. The prognosis for recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC patients remains poor with an estimated median overall survival (mOS) of 7-15 months in the first line setting and 5-8 months in the second line setting and beyond. Approximately 4-8% of HNSCC tumors are driven by gain-of-function mutations in the HRAS (m HRAS) proto-oncogene. Tipifarnib is a potent and selective farnesyltransferase inhibitor that disrupts HRAS function by blocking required protein membrane localization, and subsequent cellular growth and survival. Data from a prior phase 2 study (RUN-HN; NCT02383927) of tipifarnib in R/M m HRAS HNSCC patients in the second line plus setting demonstrated encouraging efficacy, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 55% and mOS of 15.4 months for patients with mHRAS variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥ 20%, providing support for pursuing a pivotal trial in this patient population. Methods: AIM-HN (NCT03719690) is a global, open-label single-arm pivotal study evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of tipifarnib in second line plus R/M m HRAS HNSCC patients. The primary objective is to determine the ORR in patients with a m HRAS VAF ≥ 20% (High VAF population), as assessed using RECIST v1.1 by Independent Review Facility. Key secondary objectives include the ORR for patients of all VAF levels, and the duration of responses for both VAF≥ 20% and all VAF levels. Key inclusion criteria include: histologically confirmed head and neck cancer of squamous histology not amenable to local therapy with curative intent; known tumor missense HRAS mutation (with VAF determined and available) detected by Next Generation Sequencing; ECOG performance status of 0-1; measurable disease by RECIST v1.1; and adequate organ function. Key exclusion criteria include: salivary gland, thyroid, (primary) cutaneous squamous or non-squamous histologies; intolerable Grade 2 or ≥ Grade 3 neuropathy or unstable neurological symptoms within 4 weeks of Cycle 1 Day 1; or active, uncontrolled infections requiring systemic therapy. Tipifarnib is administered at a dose of 600 mg, orally with a meal twice a day for 7 days in alternating weeks (Days 1-7 and 15-21) of 28-day cycles until discontinuation criteria are met. All patients are being followed for safety through the End of Treatment visit, roughly 30 days after treatment discontinuation or immediately before the administration of another anticancer treatment, whichever occurs first. Upon therapy discontinuation, all patients are being followed approximately every 12 weeks for survival status, and the use of subsequent therapy. The IDMB last reviewed data in October 2020 and recommended the trial continue as planned. AIM-HN is continuing to enroll patients globally. Ho et al, JCO, accepted. Clinical trial information: NCT03719690.

6053 Background: Locoregional recurrence (LRR) is a major cause of death for patients (pts) with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). With therapy options limited by prior treatment, surgery often represents the best chance for disease control. Emerging data suggests a role for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in upfront resectable SCCHN and the importance of NK cells in the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesized that dual immune checkpoint inhibition (anti-PD-1, nivolumab [N] and anti-KIR, lirilumab [L]) before and after salvage surgery would improve 1-year disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: Pts with operable LRR of SCCHN (any HPV or smoking status) with a disease-free interval of > 8 weeks after curative intent therapy were eligible for this phase II trial. Pts received a single dose of pre-op N (240 mg) + L (240 mg) 7-21 days before surgery, followed by 6-cycles of adjuvant N+L on days 1, 15 (N alone) of a 28-day cycle (C) for C1-3; and on day 1 for C4-6. Primary endpoint was 1-year DFS; 37 DFS events among N = 54 pts provided 81% power to detect improvement in 1-year DFS from 57% to 67.5% (one-sided 10% Wald’s test). Secondary endpoints: safety, radiologic response (RECIST v1.1) to pre-op N+L, and overall survival (OS). Correlatives included tumor sequencing, PD-L1 status, and immunoprofiling. Results: Between 3/15/18 and 5/29/20, N = 29 enrolled (stopped due to expiration of drug supply). Among 28 treated pts, median age: 66, 18% (5/28) women, 83% smokers; primary site: 10 oral cavity, 8 oropharynx (5/8 HPV+), and 10 larynx/hypopharynx. 96% (27/28) had prior HN radiation; 71% (20/28) prior chemotherapy. There were no delays to surgery. Grade 3+ adverse events: 11% (3/28); no deaths from treatment. At time of surgery, 96% (27/28) had stable disease radiologically with 3 showing regression, 4% (1/28) had disease progression. Pathologic response to N+L was observed in 43% (12/28): 4/28 (14%) major (tumor viability, TV ≤10%); 8/28 (29%) partial (TV ≤50%). PD-L1 CPS at surgery was similar regardless of pathologic response (p = 0.63). 68% (19/28) completed all 6-cycles of adjuvant N+L; N = 1 came off for toxicity. Ten pts (36%) recurred (local = 8, distant = 2). 5/28 (18%) had positive margins, of which 4 (80%) recurred; 4/28 (14%) declined to start adjuvant N+L, of which 3 (75%) later recurred. At median follow-up of 20.2 months, 1-year DFS70% (95%CI, 48-84%) and 1-year OS: 85% (95%CI, 65-94%). Median tumor mutational burden was 4 (range, 1-11). TP53 was the most frequent alteration (78%, 21/27). CD39 expression by TILs and CD38 expression by circulating CD4/8+ T cells increased after N+L exposure (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant N+L was safe and well tolerated. We observed a 43% pathologic response rate prior to salvage surgery, with a favorable 1-year DFS of 70% and 1-year OS > 80% among previously irradiated pts. Further evaluation of this strategy is warranted (NCT03341936).

6008 Background: We reported that one cycle of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab induced pathologic tumor response in >10% (pTR-any) and in >50% (pTR-2) of the resection bed in 44% and 22% of patients (pts) with surgically resectable HPV-negative, Stage III/IV HNSCC ( Clin Cancer Res 2020). We hypothesized that two cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab would induce pTR-2 in 50% of pts. Increasing the pathologic response rate may favorably impact clinical outcomes. Methods: Multi-institutional phase 2 trial where pts with locally advanced, HPV-negative HNSCC received two cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg), given 42 and 21 days prior to surgery. Resected tumor was analyzed by two independent pathologists for pTR (tumor necrosis and/or giant cell/histiocytic reaction to keratinous debris) in the resection bed (primary tumor and/or lymph nodes). Additional definitions: pTR-1 (>10-49%) and major pathologic response ( > 90%). The primary endpoint was pTR-2. A sample size of 26 pts was needed to detect a significantly higher pTR-2 rate of 50%, with 80% power using a one-sided alpha level of 0.05. Pts were followed for serious adverse events (AEs) for 30 days after surgery and for AEs of clinical interest for 90 days following the last dose of pembrolizumab. Pts underwent baseline blood collection and tumor biopsies to match with blood and surgical specimens obtained post-pembrolizumab. Planned correlatives included PD-L1 expression, immune function, and molecular signatures of activation in the pre- and post-treatment blood and tumor tissue. Results: Characteristics of 29 enrolled and treated pts were median age 62 (30-82) yrs, smoking history 62% (18 pts); clinical stage T2 (n = 6), T3 (n = 5), T4 (n = 18) and N0/1 (n = 17), N2 (n = 12). All treated patients received two cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, which was tolerated well with only one (3%) grade 3 AE (rash) and no grade 4 AEs. The primary endpoint was evaluable in 25 pts, and not evaluable in 4 pts (one pt withdrew before surgery and in three pts, pTR review was pending). pTR-2 occurred in 44% (11 of 25 pts), and 4 (16%) of these pts had a major pathologic response including 1 (4%) pathologic CR at the primary site. Conclusions: Two (vs one) cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab resulted in a two-fold increase in the frequency of pTR-2 (44% vs 22%). These data imply that the frequency of pTR to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab can be improved by increasing the number of cycles and the treatment interval. Clinical trial information: NCT02296684.

Introduction: Patients with thoracic malignancies are susceptible to severe outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to evaluate the disruption to care of patients with thoracic malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The COVID-19 and Cancer Outcomes Study (CCOS) is a multicenter prospective cohort study comprised of adult patients with a current or past history of hematological malignancy or invasive solid tumor who had an outpatient medical oncology visit on the index week between March 2 and March 6, 2020 at the Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, NY (MSSM) or the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, MA (DFCI). An electronic data capture platform was used to collect patient-, cancer-, and treatment-related variables during the three months prior to the index week (the baseline period) and the following three months (the pandemic period). Two-by-three contingency tables with Fisher’s exact tests were computed. All tests were two-tailed and considered statistically significant for p Citation Format: Sheena Bhalla, Ziad Bakouny, Andrew L. Schmidt, John A. Steinharter, Douglas A. Tremblay, Mark M. Awad, Alaina J. Kessler, Robert I. Haddad, Michelle Evans, Fiona Busser, Michael Wotman, Catherine R. Curran, Brittney S. Zimmerman, Gabrielle Bouchard, Tomi Jun, Pier V. Nuzzo, Qian Qin, Laure Hirsch, Jonathan Feld, Kaitlin M Kelleher, Danielle Seidman, Hsin-Hui Huang, Chris Labaki, Heather M. Anderson-Keightly, Sarah Abou Alaiwi, Talia D. Rosenbloom, Penina S. Stewart, Matthew D. Galsky, Toni K. Choueiri, Deborah B. Doroshow. Disruption to care of patients with thoracic malignancies: A COVID-19 and cancer outcomes study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Meeting: COVID-19 and Cancer; 2021 Feb 3-5. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(6_Suppl):Abstract nr S06-02.

475 Background: ICB has shown clinical benefit across several metastatic carcinomas; however, predictive biomarkers are still lacking. CDKN2A is one of the most commonly altered genes across human cancers. With prior studies giving conflicting evidence regarding the association between CDKN2A alterations and ICBs, we examined the impact of CDKN2A alterations on clinical outcomes in UC patients treated with ICBs. Methods: Of 809 patients at the Dana Farber Cancer institute (DFCI) treated with ICBs only and with relevant cancer types and targeted exome sequencing data (Oncopanel), 235 (29%) had loss-of-function (LOF) mutations or homozygous deletions in CDKN2A. Overall survival (OS) was compared by Cox logistic regression between CDKN2A altered and CDKN2A wild type (WT) patients. Hazard ratio (HR) was derived using multivariable analysis (MVA), adjusted for prior lines of therapy and tumor mutational burden (TMB). A validation cohort from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) (Samstein et al., Nature Genetics, 2019) of 811 cancer patients treated with ICBs was analyzed in a similar manner, adjusted for TMB. As a control, the association between CDKN2A alterations and OS was examined in a cohort of platinum-treated UC patients (N = 56) to determine whether CDKN2A alterations were predictive of response to ICIs. Results: For the DFCI and MSKCC cohorts, median follow-up was 26.9 and 24 months (m), respectively. In the DFCI and MSKCC cohorts, CDKN2A alterations were found in 32/90 (35%) and 22/104 (21.2%) of UC, respectively; 4/55 (7.3%) and 3/131 (2.3%) of renal cell carcinoma, respectively; 73/178 (41%) and 45/194 (23.2%) of melanoma tumors, respectively; 86/370 (23.2%) and 26/260 (10%) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors, respectively; 18/66 (27.2%) and 4/53 (7.5%) of esophagogastric tumors, respectively; and 22/50 (44%) and 11/69 (15.9%) of head and neck, respectively. CDKN2A alterations were significantly associated with shorter OS and TTF in the DFCI UC and melanoma cohorts by MVA, and showed a trend towards significance in the MSKCC UC cohort (Table). There was no significant association between CDKN2A alterations and OS for the other cancer types in both cohorts; and no association with OS or TTF was seen in the DFCI cisplatin-treated UC cohort. Conclusions: CDKN2A alteration status may serve as a predictive biomarker in patients with UC treated with ICBs. Further studies are needed to examine the mechanism of this clinical effect. [Table: see text]

Background: Preclinical and clinical studies suggest potential synergy between high dose per fraction focal radiation and immunotherapy. However, conventionally fractionated radiation regimens in combination with concurrent chemotherapy are more commonly administered to patients as definitive treatment and may have both immune-stimulating and -suppressive effects. Methods: We prospectively collected longitudinal samples from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiation therapy. We quantified changes in populations of circulating immune cells and chemokines CXCL9, 10, and 16. Analyses of humoral and cellular immune responses were conducted in select patients via proteomic analysis and T-cell receptor sequencing. Results: Treatment not only increased circulating CD-8+ T-effector cells, but also myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells, and checkpoint receptor-expressing T cells, particularly PD-1+ T cells. Significant decreases in CXCL10 and increases in CXLC16 were noted. Treatment also increased the percentage of unique and dominant TCR clones, and increased humoral responses as measured by proteomic array. Conclusions: Our results suggest that fractionated chemoradiation leads to quantifiable effects in circulating immune mediators, including a balance of stimulatory and suppressive mechanisms. These results suggest future combinations with immune checkpoint blockade.