Search

The benefit of radiation therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. We hypothesized that a new mechanistic mathematical model of chemotherapy and radiation response could predict clinical outcomes a priori, using a previously described baseline measurement of perfusion from computed tomography scans, normalized area under the enhancement curve (nAUC).We simplified an existing mass transport model that predicted cancer cell death by replacing previously unknown variables with averaged direct measurements from randomly selected pathologic sections of untreated PDAC. This allowed using nAUC as the sole model input to approximate tumor perfusion. We then compared the predicted cancer cell death to the actual cell death measured from corresponding resected tumors treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation in a calibration cohort (n = 80) and prospective cohort (n = 25). After calibration, we applied the model to 2 separate cohorts for pathologic and clinical associations: targeted therapy cohort (n = 101), cetuximab/bevacizumab + radiosensitizing chemotherapy, and standard chemoradiation cohort (n = 81), radiosensitizing chemotherapy to 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions.We established the relationship between pretreatment computed v nAUC to pathologically verified blood volume fraction of the tumor (r = 0.65; P = .009) and fractional tumor cell death (r = 0.97-0.99; P.0001) in the calibration and prospective cohorts. On multivariate analyses, accounting for traditional covariates, nAUC independently associated with overall survival in all cohorts (mean hazard ratios, 0.14-0.31). Receiver operator characteristic analyses revealed discrimination of good and bad prognostic groups in the cohorts with area under the curve values of 0.64 to 0.71.This work presents a new mathematical modeling approach to predict clinical response from chemotherapy and radiation for PDAC. Our findings indicate that oxygen/drug diffusion strongly influences clinical responses and that nAUC is a potential tool to select patients with PDAC for radiation therapy.

Background Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has improved outcomes for patients with microsatellite instability high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors. However, not all MSI-H/dMMR patients will exhibit the same ICB efficacy. Previous studies suggest that concomitant antibiotic use while receiving ICB may result in poorer outcomes. We aimed to evaluate this association in patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Materials and Methods A single-site, retrospective review of 57 patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC that received ICB was completed. Data collected included patient demographics, ICB information, and antibiotic use. Antibiotic exposure was considered from 90 days prior to ICB through 6 weeks after initiation. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Results The majority of patients received pembrolizumab (27 [47%]) or nivolumab (17 [30%]) monotherapy as their ICB agent. Of the 57 patients, 19 (33.3%) had antibiotic exposure from 90 days prior to ICB initiation through 6 weeks after initiation with most (13 [68%]) having antibiotic use in the 30 days preceding ICB initiation. Similar ORRs were seen in both groups (P-value > .99). No difference was observed in OS (P-value .29) or PFS (P-value .36) between groups. Conclusion Our data show no association of lower response rates or survival in those MSI-H/dMMR patients with mCRC who receive antibiotics around the initiation of ICB. This information needs to be confirmed in a larger prospective cohort.

Over the past two decades of successive clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), the median overall survival of both control and experimental arms has steadily improved. However, the incremental change in survival for metastatic CRC patients not treated on trial has not yet been quantified. We performed a retrospective review of 1420 patients with de novo metastatic CRC who received their primary treatment at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC) from 2004 through 2019. Median OS was roughly stable for patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 (22.6 months) but since has steadily improved for those diagnosed in 2013 to 2015 (28.8 months), and 2016 to 2019 (32.4 months). Likewise, 5-year survival rate has increased from 15.7% for patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2006 to 26% for those diagnosed from 2013 to 2015. Notably, survival improved for patients with BRAFV600E mutant as well as microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) tumors. Multivariate regression analysis identified surgical resection of liver metastasis (HR = 0.26, 95% CI, 0.19–0.37), use of immunotherapy (HR = 0.44, 95% CI, 0.29–0.67) and use of third line chemotherapy (regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil, HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58–0.95), but not year of diagnosis (HR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.98–1), as associated with better survival, suggesting that increased use of these therapies are the drivers of the observed improvement in survival.

PURPOSE KRAS p.G12C mutations occur in approximately 3% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC). Recently, two allosteric inhibitors of KRAS p.G12C have demonstrated activity in early phase clinical trials. There are no robust studies examining the behavior of this newly targetable population. METHODS We queried the MD Anderson Cancer Center data set for patients with colorectal cancer who harbored KRAS p.G12C mutations between January 2003 and September 2019. Patients were analyzed for clinical characteristics, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) and compared against KRAS nonG12C. Next, we analyzed several internal and external data sets to assess immune signatures, gene expression profiles, hypermethylation, co-occurring mutations, and proteomics. RESULTS Among the 4,632 patients with comprehensive molecular profiling, 134 (2.9%) were found to have KRAS p.G12C mutations. An additional 53 patients with single gene sequencing were included in clinical data but excluded from prevalence analysis allowing for 187 total patients. Sixty-five patients had de novo metastatic disease and received a median of two lines of chemotherapy without surgical intervention. For the first three lines of chemotherapy, the median PFS was 6.4 months (n = 65; 95% CI, 5.0 to 7.4 months), 3.9 months (n = 47; 95% CI, 2.9 to 5.9 months), and 3.0 months (n = 21; 95% CI, 2.0 to 3.4 months), respectively. KRAS p.G12C demonstrated higher rates of basal EGFR activation compared with KRAS nonG12C. When compared with an internal cohort of KRAS nonG12C, KRAS p.G12C patients had worse OS. CONCLUSION PFS is poor for patients with KRAS p.G12C metastatic colorectal cancer. OS was worse in KRAS p.G12C compared with KRAS nonG12C patients. Our data highlight the innate resistance to chemotherapy for KRAS p.G12C patients and serve as a historical comparator for future clinical trials.

Recent studies defined a potentially important role of the microbiome in modulating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and responses to therapies. We hypothesized that antibiotic usage may predict outcomes in patients with PDAC. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of patients with resectable or metastatic PDAC seen at MD Anderson Cancer from 2003 to 2017. Demographic, chemotherapy regimen and antibiotic use, duration, type, and reason for indication were recorded. A total of 580 patients with PDAC were studied, 342 resected and 238 metastatic patients, selected retrospectively from our database. Antibiotic use, for longer than 48 hrs, was detected in 209 resected patients (61%) and 195 metastatic ones (62%). On resectable patients, we did not find differences in overall survival (OS) or progression‐free survival (PFS), based on antibiotic intake. However, in the metastatic cohort, antibiotic consumption was associated with a significantly longer OS (13.3 months vs. 9.0 months, HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34–0.7, p = 0.0001) and PFS (4.4 months vs. 2 months, HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34–0.68, p =, We have analyzed the effect of antibiotics’ intake on two cohorts of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, resectable, and metastatic. We have found that on the metastatic cohort, antibiotics use was significantly associated with better outcomes, particularly, on patients that received gemcitabine based‐chemotherapy as the first line.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive neoplasm with poor clinical outcome because most patients present at an advanced stage, at which point curative surgical options, such as tumor excision or liver transplantation, are not feasible. Therefore, the majority of HCC patients require systemic therapy. Nonetheless, the currently approved systemic therapies have limited effects, particularly in patients with advanced and resistant disease. Hence, there is a critical need to identify new molecular targets and effective systemic therapies to improve HCC outcome. The liver is a major target of the growth hormone receptor (GHR) signaling, and accumulating evidence suggests that GHR signaling plays an important role in HCC pathogenesis. We tested the hypothesis that GHR could represent a potential therapeutic target in this aggressive neoplasm. We measured GH levels in 767 HCC patients and 200 healthy controls, and then carried out clinicopathological correlation analyses. Moreover, specific inhibition of GHR was performed in vitro using siRNA and pegvisomant (a small peptide that blocks GHR signaling and is currently approved by the FDA to treat acromegaly) and in vivo, also using pegvisomant. GH was significantly elevated in 49.5% of HCC patients, and these patients had a more aggressive disease and poorer clinical outcome (Pin vitro. In addition, pegvisomant potentiated the effects of sorafenib (Pin vivo. Mechanistically, pegvisomant decreased the phosphorylation of GHR downstream survival proteins including JAK2, STAT3, STAT5, IRS-1, AKT, ERK, and IGF-IR. In two patients with advanced-stage HCC and high GH who developed sorafenib resistance, pegvisomant caused tumor stability. Our data show that GHR signaling represents a novel “druggable” target, and pegvisomant may function as an effective systemic therapy in HCC. Our findings could also lead to testing GHR inhibition in other aggressive cancers.

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GemNP) therapies are increasingly used to treat patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, limited data are available on their clinicopathologic prognosticators. We examined the clinicopathologic factors and survival of 213 PDAC patients who received FOLFIRINOX with 71 patients who received GemNP. The FOLFIRINOX group was younger (p < 0.01) and had a higher rate of radiation (p = 0.049), higher rate of borderline resectable and locally advanced disease (p < 0.001), higher rate of Group 1 response (p = 0.045) and lower ypN stage (p = 0.03) than the GemNP group. Within FOLFIRINOX group, radiation was associated with decreased lymph node metastasis (p = 0.01) and lower ypN stage (p = 0.01). The tumor response group, ypT, ypN, LVI and PNI, correlated significantly with both DFS and OS (p < 0.05). Patients with the ypT0/T1a/T1b tumor had better DFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.03) than those with ypT1c tumor. In multivariate analysis, the tumor response group and ypN were independently prognostic factors for DFS and OS (p < 0.05). Our study demonstrated that the FOLFIRINOX group was younger and had a better pathologic response than the GemNP group and that the tumor response group, ypN, ypT, LVI and PNI, are significant prognostic factors for survival in these patients. Our results also suggest that the tumor size of 1.0 cm is a better cut off for ypT2. Our study highlights the importance of systemic pathologic examination and the reporting of post-treatment pancreatectomies.

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)-based cancer immunotherapies have shown great promise for inducing clinical regressions by targeting tumor-associated antigens (TAA). To expand the TAA landscape of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), we performed tandem mass spectrometry analysis of HLA class I-bound peptides from 35 PDAC patient tumors. This identified a shared HLA-A*0101 restricted peptide derived from co-transcriptional activator Vestigial-like 1 (VGLL1) as a putative TAA demonstrating overexpression in multiple tumor types and low or absent expression in essential normal tissues. Here we show that VGLL1-specific CTLs expanded from the blood of a PDAC patient could recognize and kill in an antigen-specific manner a majority of HLA-A*0101 allogeneic tumor cell lines derived not only from PDAC, but also bladder, ovarian, gastric, lung, and basal-like breast cancers. Gene expression profiling reveals VGLL1 as a member of a unique group of cancer-placenta antigens (CPA) that may constitute immunotherapeutic targets for patients with multiple cancer types., Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)-based immunotherapies can induce tumor regressions by targeting HLA class I-bound tumor-associated peptides. Here, the authors identified a peptide derived from Vestigial-like 1 (VGLL1) as a shared, potentially therapeutic CTL target expressed by multiple cancer types.

Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma anal cancer (SCCA) is rare. Prospective data recommends front-line platinum doublet combinations and second-line anti-programmed death-1 therapy. Standard therapy beyond these treatments are currently unknown. We evaluated anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) outcomes in metastatic SCCA.Metastatic SCCA patients given anti-EGFR mAb from Oct 2011-May 2018 were included. Primary endpoints included best response, progression-free survival, and overall survival.56 patients were evaluated with a median of one prior therapy. Most patients (~90%) received anti-EGFR mAbs with chemotherapy. Response rate (any response) was 41%. Median PFS was 4.3 months with a median OS of 16 M. Seven patients with disease control proceeded onto maintenance therapy (anti-EGFR mAb ± a fluoropyrimidine) with a median PFS of 13.8 M. Next generation sequencing of 16 pts (28%) showed 4 pts had a PIK3CA mutation with 3 of these 4 patients demonstrating progression on initial restaging.Our analysis suggests anti-EGFR mAb therapy with chemotherapy provides clinical benefit in previously treated metastatic SCCA. Our maintenance therapy and the role of PIK3CA MT outcomes were thought-provoking.Metastatic SCCA patients have limited options; therefore, anti-EGFR mAbs may provide benefit in the treatment armamentarium and should be further explored.

Background Gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab‐paclitaxel (NabP) (GEM 1000 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes + NabP 125 mg/m2 IV given days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days) is one of the two standard of care combination therapies for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Our cancer center has utilized GEM‐NabP given every two‐weeks due to tolerability and patient convenience. Here, we review the safety and efficacy of this modified regimen. Methods Metastatic PDAC patients (pts) who initiated front‐line or second‐line GEM‐NabP during 2013‐2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary objective was overall survival. Secondary objectives were disease control rate, progression‐free survival, and the incidence of dose delays and/or adjustments. Results From a total of 235 patients, 140 pts received GEM‐NabP front‐line while 95 pts received GEM‐NabP second‐line. Median dosing was 600 mg/m2 at fixed‐dose rate for GEM and 125 mg/m2 for NabP given predominantly (~90%) every two‐weeks. Eastern Cooperative Group performance status of 0 and 1 pts had front‐line OS of 12.7 and 9.6 months and when given second‐line had OS of 8 months and 7.3 months, respectively. ECOG 0 and 1 pts had front‐line progression‐free survival (PFS) of 5.3 months and 2.8 months and second‐line PFS was 3.5 months and 2.4 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated with limited dose modifications. Conclusion Our analysis revealed safety with every two‐week low dose GEM‐NabP while maintaining efficacy. Patient schedule convenience should factor into metastatic incurable malignancies. We suggest the use of every two‐week GEM‐NabP particularly in patients desiring a modified schedule., Our real‐world data, outside the context of a clinical trial, suggests that every two‐week Gem‐NabP can be administered safely without compromising efficacy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In particular, the alternate (bi‐weekly) dosing regimen showed low rates of grades 3 and 4 toxicities and no treatment‐related deaths. This regimen is better tolerated than weekly Gem‐NabP, is convenient, and allows similar palliative benefits to patients with metastatic PDAC.

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has rapidly spread globally since being identified as a public health emergency of major international concern and has now been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). In December 2019, an outbreak of atypical pneumonia, known as COVID‐19, was identified in Wuhan, China. The newly identified zoonotic coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), is characterized by rapid human‐to‐human transmission. Many cancer patients frequently visit the hospital for treatment and disease surveillance. They may be immunocompromised due to the underlying malignancy or anticancer therapy and are at higher risk of developing infections. Several factors increase the risk of infection, and cancer patients commonly have multiple risk factors. Cancer patients appear to have an estimated twofold increased risk of contracting SARS‐CoV‐2 than the general population. With the WHO declaring the novel coronavirus outbreak a pandemic, there is an urgent need to address the impact of such a pandemic on cancer patients. This include changes to resource allocation, clinical care, and the consent process during a pandemic. Currently and due to limited data, there are no international guidelines to address the management of cancer patients in any infectious pandemic. In this review, the potential challenges associated with managing cancer patients during the COVID‐19 infection pandemic will be addressed, with suggestions of some practical approaches. Implications for Practice The main management strategies for treating cancer patients during the COVID‐19 epidemic include clear communication and education about hand hygiene, infection control measures, high‐risk exposure, and the signs and symptoms of COVID‐19. Consideration of risk and benefit for active intervention in the cancer population must be individualized. Postponing elective surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy for cancer patients with low risk of progression should be considered on a case‐by‐case basis. Minimizing outpatient visits can help to mitigate exposure and possible further transmission. Telemedicine may be used to support patients to minimize number of visits and risk of exposure. More research is needed to better understand SARS‐CoV‐2 virology and epidemiology., Cancer patients have an increased risk of contracting COVID‐19. This article addresses the challenges associated with managing cancer patients during the COVID‐19 infection pandemic and suggests some practical approaches.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Fibrosis and cirrhosis are important risk factors for the development of HCC. Hepatic myofibroblasts are the cells responsible for extracellular matrix deposition, which is the hallmark of liver fibrosis. It is believed that myofibroblasts are predominantly derived from hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), also known as Ito cells. Nevertheless, depending on the nature of insult to the liver, it is thought that myofibroblasts may also originate from a variety of other cell types such as the portal fibroblasts (PFs), fibrocytes, hepatocytes, hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs), and mesothelial cells. Liver myofibroblasts are believed to transform into cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) while HCC is developing. There is substantial evidence suggesting that activated HSCs (aHSCs)/cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) may play an important role in HCC initiation and progression. In this paper, we aim to review current literature on cellular origins of myofibroblasts with a focus on hepatitis B virus (HBV)- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced hepatic fibrosis. We also address the role of aHSCs/CAFs in HCC progression through the regulation of immune cells as well as mechanisms of evolvement of drug resistance.

Effective consolidative chemoradiation (CRT) regimens are lacking. In this phase 1 trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, and radiation therapy after induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC and BRPC). Also, we evaluated a computed tomography (CT)-based biomarker of response.Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, underwent computed tomography-imaging, received a diagnosis of LAPC or BRPC, and received induction chemotherapy. Standard 3 + 3 study design was used, with 3 escalating nab-paclitaxel dose levels (50, 75, and 100 mg/mTwenty-three patients started and finished on protocol (LAPC = 14, BRPC = 9). No grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported in level 1 (n = 3) or level 2 (n = 3) initial groups. Two patients in the initial level 3 group developed dose limiting toxicity, establishing level 2 dose as the maximal tolerated dose. Level 2 group was expanded for additional 15 patients (for a total of 23 on trial), 5 of whom developed grade 3 toxicities. Seven patients underwent surgical resection. Median OS and PFS were 21.2 and 8.1 months, respectively. Type I IR was associated with better OS (P = .004) and PFS (P = .03) compared with type II IR.We established the maximum tolerated dose for nab-paclitaxel in a consolidative CRT regimen for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Preliminary efficacy results warrant phase 2 trial evaluation. IR may be used for personalized treatment.

3 Background: For patients with metastatic anal cancer, demonstration of anti-tumor activity by anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies has expanded the treatment landscape. To date, there are no predictive biomarkers associated with clinical benefit to immunotherapy in this setting. In the absence of clinical trials directly comparing chemotherapy and immunotherapy for metastatic anal cancer, the optimal sequencing of therapeutic lines remains undefined because historical series have been limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy. We evaluated the survival outcomes of patients with metastatic anal cancer following treatment with immunotherapy and with chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed retrospectively the MD Anderson Cancer Center database for patients with unresectable and/or metastatic anal cancer diagnosed between 6/2014 and 11/2021. Median survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between subpopulations of interest with a log-rank test. Results: Among 82 patients with metastatic anal cancer, 68 (83%) were female, and the median age was 60 years (range, 39-81). With a median follow-up time of 24.6 months, the median lines of systemic therapy were 2 (range, 1-5). 58 (71%) received anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy, either alone (N=51) or in combination with bevacizumab or with MEDI-0457 on a clinical trial (N=7). Median progression-free survival times (PFS) for lines 1, 2, and 3 of systemic therapy were 7.2 months (95% CI (Confidence Interval) 5.3-9.1; N=82), 3.6 months (95% CI 2.4-4.8; N=58), and 4.1 months (95% CI 2.8-5.4; N=34), respectively. In the treatment-refractory setting, no difference in median PFS between chemotherapy and immunotherapy was observed (4.7 months vs 2.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.9, 95% CI 0.5-1.4); p=.17). Median overall survival (OS) was estimated at 33.9 months (95% CI, 24.0-34.8). For patients with metastatic anal cancer treated with immunotherapy, involvement of only distant lymph nodes (N=10/58, 17%) was associated with improved median PFS (11.3 months vs 2.8 months; HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.8-6.6; p=.002) and median OS (45.2 months vs 27.1 months; HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.5, p=.02) than other sites of distant organ involvement (N=48/58, 83%). Conclusions: In this single-institution retrospective study at a large academic referral center, both chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade were effective treatment options for patients with metastatic anal cancer. These data provide historical context in estimating median PFS necessary for future trial design in patients with metastatic anal cancer. Lymph node-only distribution of distant metastatic disease was predictive for improved survival with immunotherapy. Pending further validation, these data provide novel identification of a potential predictive factor associated with benefit to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic anal cancer.

PURPOSE Effective preoperative regimens and biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are lacking. We prospectively evaluated fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX)-based treatment and imaging-based biomarkers for borderline resectable PDAC. METHODS Eligible patients had treatment-naïve, histology-confirmed PDAC and one or more high-risk features: mesenteric vessel involvement, CA 19-9 level of 500 mg/dL or greater, and indeterminate metastatic lesions. Patients received modified FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation before anticipated pancreatectomy. Tumors were classified on baseline computed tomography as high delta (well-defined interface with parenchyma) or low delta (ill-defined interface). We designated computed tomography interface response after therapy as type I (remained or became well defined) or type II (became ill defined). The study had 80% power to differentiate a 60% from 40% resection rate (α = .10). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and subgroups were compared using log-rank tests. RESULTS Thirty-three patients initiated therapy; 45% underwent pancreatectomy. The median OS was 24 months (95% CI, 16.2 to 29.6 months). For patients who did and did not undergo pancreatectomy, the median OS was 42 months (95% CI, 17.7 months to not estimable) and 14 months (95% CI, 9.0 to 24.8 months), respectively. Patients with high-delta tumors had lower 3-year PFS (4% v 40%) and 3-year OS rates (20% v 60%) than those with low-delta tumors (both P < .05). Patients with type II interface responses had lower 3-year PFS (0% v 29%) and 3-year OS rates (16% v 47%) than those with type I responses (both P < .001). CONCLUSION Preoperative FOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiation for high-risk borderline resectable PDAC was associated with a resection rate of 45% and median OS of approximately 2 years. Our imaging-based biomarker validation indicates that personalized treatment may be achieved using these biomarkers at baseline and post-treatment.

Background: The relationship between obesity and colorectal cancer (CRC) outcome is poorly understood in late-stage patients. Increased body mass may negate aspirin use for cancer prevention, but the influence of body mass index (BMI) on post-diagnosis aspirin use is unclear. This study aims to evaluate impacts of pre-diagnosis BMI and post-diagnosis aspirin use on overall survival in late-stage CRC patients on the Assessment of Targeted Therapies Against Colorectal Cancer (ATTACC) clinical protocol. Methods: Patients with metastatic or treatment refractory disease were consented on the ATTACC protocol at MD Anderson Cancer Center and invited to complete a survey on risk factors relevant to CRC etiology. Using survey data, BMI was calculated from the decade prior to initial CRC diagnosis for 656 patients. Survival was measured from stage IV diagnosis until death or last follow-up. Cox Proportional Hazards models were constructed to estimate associations of pre-diagnosis obesity and post-diagnosis aspirin use with overall survival. Results: Controlling for age, sex, race, stage at initial diagnosis, and weight change between pre-diagnosis and survey date, patients with pre-diagnosis obesity had significantly higher likelihood of death (HR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.91) compared to those with normal pre-diagnosis BMI. Further, only patients with normal weight pre-diagnosis experienced a survival benefit with post-diagnosis aspirin use (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.90). Conclusions: Our findings suggest potentially differential tumor development resulting from the long-term physiologic host environment, here obesity. Confirmation and further evaluation are needed to determine whether pre-diagnosis BMI may predict benefit from post-diagnosis aspirin use. Citation Format: Jennifer S. Davis, Janelle C. Chavez, Melissa Kok, Yazmin San Miguel, Hwa Young Lee, Henry Henderson, Michael J. Overman, Van Karlyle Morris, Bryan Kee, David Fogelman, Shailesh M. Advani, Benny Johnson, Christine Parseghian, John Paul Shen, Arvind Dasari, Kenna R. Shaw, Eduardo Vilar, Kanwal P. Raghav, Imad Shureiqi, Robert A. Wolff, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Dipen Maru, David G. Menter, Scott Kopetz, Shine Chang. Influence of pre-diagnosis obesity and post-diagnosis aspirin use on survival from stage IV colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Colorectal Cancer; 2022 Oct 1-4; Portland, OR. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(23 Suppl_1):Abstract nr A023.

Introduction: BRAF + EGFR inhibition induces decreased expression of mismatch repair (MMR) genes in preclinical models of microsatellite stable (MSS), BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but has not been reported in patients. We evaluated exosomal RNA (exoRNA) isolated from serial blood specimens collected from patients (pts) with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC treated with encorafenib (E) + cetuximab (C) + nivolumab (N) as a novel blood-based approach to compare differences in gene expression according to treatment response. Methods: Pts with refractory MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC were treated with E (300 mg daily), C (500 mg/m2 q2 weeks), and N (480 mg q4 weeks) on an IRB-approved clinical trial at MD Anderson. Responses to treatment were assessed every 8 weeks (RECIST v1.1). ExoRNA isolated from pretreatment and on-treatment (week 8) blood samples were sequenced (SMART-seq) and deconvoluted (DeMix) in order to estimate cancer-specific gene expression. Previously validated MAPK and interferon (IFN)-γ gene expression signatures were used for measuring transcriptomic changes following treatment with E+C+N. Scores between responders and non-responders were compared by unpaired t-tests. For Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), an adjusted false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.25 was applied to find significantly enriched pathways between on-treatment and pretreatment samples separately for responders and non-responders. Results: 26 pts were treated with E+C+N, and 24 were evaluable for response. Overall response rate was 50% (95% confidence interval (CI), 29-71), and median progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.0-NA). Four pts remained on study > 12 months. Between responders vs non-responders (N=12 each), mean changes in MAPK signature score was decreased (-0.63 vs 0.15, respectively; p=.13). Both patients with response > 18 months demonstrated dramatic increases in IFN-γ score following treatment with E+C+N (+13.1 and +14.6), a trend not observed in all other patients (range, -18.0 to 3.6). Among responders to E+C+N, GSEA analysis demonstrated dynamic pathway changes in normalized enrichment score (NES) for DNA repair (NES -2.3; p-adj=.008), IL6/JAK/STAT3 (NES -2.1, p-adj=.02), and IFN-α response (NES -2.0, p-adj=.03). For non-responders, relative increases in NES were observed for angiogenesis (NES 2.1, p-adj=.02) and IL-2/STAT5 (NES 2.0, p-adj= .02). Conclusions: Transcriptome analysis using exoRNA isolated from serial blood samples is feasible for assessing treatment response in pts with mCRC. Decreased MAPK score in exoRNA may be associated with treatment response to E+C+N in pts with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC. Changes in immune NES scores following treatment may distinguish responders from non-responders to MAPK + PD-1 blockade and highlight targets for novel immune-mediated combinations for MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC. Citation Format: Van Karlyle Morris, Kimal I. Rajapakshe, Vahid Bahrambeigi, Christine M. Parsehgian, Benny Johnson, Kanwal P. Raghav, Arvind Dasari, Ryan W. Huey, Michael J. Overman, Jason Willis, Michael S. Lee, Robert A. Wolff, Bryan K. Kee, Phat Le, Paola A. Guerrero, Scott Kopetz, Anirban Maitra. Changes in exosomal RNA expression associate with treatment response to BRAF + EGFR + PD-1 blockade in MSS, BRAFV600E colorectal cancer: A liquid biopsy approach [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Colorectal Cancer; 2022 Oct 1-4; Portland, OR. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(23 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B028.

Purpose: VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2)–mediated angiogenesis contributes to pathogenesis of biliary tract cancers (BTC). We investigated ramucirumab, a mAb targeting VEGFR-2 for treatment of advanced, chemorefractory BTC. Patients and Methods: This is a phase II, single-arm trial for advanced, unresectable, pre-treated patients with BTC with ECOG 0/1, adequate liver, renal, and marrow functions. Ramucirumab was administered at 8 mg/kg, 2 weekly with restaging performed 8 weekly. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Exploratory endpoints included correlation of tumor mutational status with PFS and OS. Results: 61 patients were enrolled: the median age was 58.5 years; 59 with stage IV disease; 62%, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; 22%, gallbladder cancer; and 16%, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. All received prior chemotherapy: 52% had 1 prior, and rest ≥2 prior lines. Median treatment duration was 10.1 weeks (range, 2.1–86). Median PFS was 3.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1–4.8]; median OS, 9.5 months (95% CI, 5.8–13.6). One (1.7%) patient achieved partial response; 26 (43.3%), stable disease; and 25 (41.7%), disease progression; DCR, 45%. Median 6-month PFS and OS rates were 32% (95% CI, 0.22–0.46) and 58% (95% CI, 0.47–0.72). The majority of toxicities were grade 1 or 2; grade 3 proteinuria (1, 2%), hypertension (13, 22%), and pulmonary embolism (1, 2%), and grade 4 gastrointestinal bleeding (1, 2%) occurred. Conclusions: Ramucirumab was well tolerated and resulted in PFS similar to that achieved with other chemotherapy regimens used historically for chemorefractory BTC.

BackgroundMonotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade is ineffective for patients (pts) with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study investigates whether the combination of trametinib (T) with durvalumab (D) can alter the immune tumor microenvironment (TME) by successfully priming and activating T-cells.MethodsOpen-label, single-center, phase II trial with primary endpoint of immune-related response rate for combination of T+D in refractory MSS mCRC pts (NCT03428126). T is 2 mg/day orally starting 1 week prior to D, which is given 1500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks. Simon 2-stage design used to enroll 29 pts into first stage, requiring a response in two or more pts to proceed to stage 2. Tumor biopsies were collected at baseline (BL) and early on-treatment (OT) at week 4.ResultsTwenty nine treated pts include 48% females, median age 48 years (range 28–75), and median prior therapies 2 (range 1–5). No grade (G) 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). The most common TRAE of any grade was acneiform rash, 17% being G3. One of 29 pts had confirmed partial response (PR) lasting 9.3 months (mo) for an overall response rate of 3.4%. Seven pts had stable disease (SD) and five pts (1 PR, 4 SD) demonstrated decrease in total carcinoembryonic antigen ng/mL (best percentage reduction: 94%, 95%, 42%, 34%, and 22%, respectively). Median progression-free survival was 3.2 mo (range 1.1–9.3 months). Three pts with both liver and lung metastases demonstrated discrepant responses in which clinical benefit was present in the lung metastases but not liver metastases. Comparison of BL and 4-week OT tumor tissue flow cytometry demonstrated no changes in T-cell infiltration but upregulation expression of PD-1 and Tim3 on CD8 T cells. However, expression of PD-1 and Tim3 as single markers and as coexpressed markers was observed to increase OT relative to BL (p=0.03, p=0.06 and p=0.06, respectively).ConclusionsT+D demonstrated acceptable tolerability in pts with refractory MSS mCRC. The response rate in the first stage of the study did not meet efficacy criteria to proceed to the second stage. Specific site of metastatic disease may impact outcomes in novel immunotherapy combination trials.Trial registration numberNCT03428126.

2514 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are usually ineffective in patients (pts) with immune-cold microsatellite stable colorectal cancer (MSS-CRC) or pancreatic cancer (PDAC) and in those who progressed on previously treated with antibodies against PD1 or PD-L1. Here, we report the combination of NT-I7 plus pembrolizumab (pembro) on CPI-naïve MSS-CRC and PDAC cohorts, and patients (pts) with CPI-treated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cohorts of this ongoing phase 2a trial. Methods: Pts with CPI-naïve relapsed/refractory (R/R) MSS-CRC and PDAC, and CPI-treated R/R TNBC, NSCLC, and SCLC, were enrolled. NT-I7 (efineptakin alfa) 1200 µg/kg intramuscularly every 6 weeks and 200 mg pembro intravenously every 3 weeks were administered until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint of the Phase 2a is the objective response rate (ORR), assessed by RECIST v1.1 and iRECIST. The secondary endpoints are duration of response (DoR), disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: As of 14 Jan 2022, 92 pts with metastatic or locally advanced cancer who had received a median of 3 prior treatments were enrolled in the study; 32 in PDAC, 28 in MSS-CRC, 22 in NSCLC, 6 in TNBC, and 4 in SCLC. The median age was 62 years [29-81], ECOG PS 0 in 23 (25%), 1 in 68 (74%) and 2 in 1 (1%). Among 71 evaluable pts, the median follow up (months) was 7.7, 5.3, 5.0, 3.7, and 2.4 in TNBC, MSS-CRC, NSCLC, PDAC and SCLC, respectively. The ORR was 50% (1/2) in SCLC, 12% (3/25) in MSS CRC, 8% (2/26) in PDAC 6% (1/16) in NSCLC and 0% (0/2) in TNBC per iRECIST; and 50% (1/2) in SCLC, 4% (1/25) in MSS CRC, and 4% (1/26) in PDAC per RECIST 1.1. All 7 responders are ongoing. The two PDAC pts had DoR over 1.35 months (mos) and 6.64 mos with the best tumor reduction 100% and 72% respectively. The one SCLC pt had DoR over 1.5 mos with the tumor reduction 67%. The one NSCLC pt had DoR over 2.73 mos with the tumor reduction 60%, and the three MSS-CRC pts had DoR 6.34, 2.96, and 0.03 mos with the tumor reduction 60%, 56%, and 43% respectively. A sustained and significant (approximate 3X from baseline) increase of peripheral lymphocytes in all arms was observed as shown in our previous report. Among 92 treated pts, NT-I7-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 67 (72.8%) pts, including 52 (56.5%) Grade (G)1-2, 13 (14.1%) G3, and 2 (2.2%) G4. There were no NT-I7 related G5 AEs. Additional updated efficacy, safety and biomarker data will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of NT-I7 and pembro demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable toxicity profile in heavily pretreated pts with CPI-naïve MSS-CRC and PDAC and CPI-treated TNBC, NSCLC, and SCLC, suggesting that the addition of NT-I7 to CPI can overcome the primary resistance to CPI in the former group and acquired resistance in the latter. Clinical trial information: NCT04332653.

2536 Background: TIL therapy has been used extensively in metastatic melanoma patients for many years, now with ongoing efforts to commercialize treatment. The efficacy of TIL outside of melanoma is largely unknown thus we designed and implemented a trial using TIL manufactured at a single academic center for treatment refractory metastatic colorectal (CRC), pancreas (PDAC) and ovarian (OVA) cancers. Methods: Patients with CRC, PDAC and OVA refractory to standard therapies with ECOG PS 0-1 and normal organ function were eligible for TIL harvest. Ex vivo TIL expansion and manufacturing was conducted at the MD Anderson TIL lab under conditions that included IL2 and 41BB stimulation (using urelumab). All patients received a lymphodepletion regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg days -7 and -6 and fludarabine 25mg/m2 days -5 through day -1, followed by infusion of pooled ex-vivo expanded TIL. Patients received up to 6 doses of high dose IL-2 (600,000 IU/kg) after TIL infusion. The primary endpoint was evaluation of the objective response rate (ORR) using RECIST 1.1 criteria with secondary endpoints including disease control rate, duration of response, PFS, OS and safety. Results: A total of 17 patients underwent TIL harvest and 16 were treated on protocol; including 8 CRC, 5 PDAC and 3 OVA. Median age was 57.5 (range 33-70) and 50% were females. Median number of lines of prior therapy was 2 (range 1-8). Median number of TIL infused was 76 X 109 (range 20.3 x 109-150 x 109). Median doses of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine administered were 2 (range, 2-2) and 3 (range, 1-5), respectively. Median doses of IL-2 administered was 6 (range, 1-6). There were no responders. Best response included prolonged SD in a patient with PDAC lasting until 18 months. Grade 3 or higher toxicities attributable to therapy was seen in 14 subjects (87.5%; 95% CI: 61.7 – 98.4) with the majority of toxicities representing expected pancytopenia from lymphodepletion. Infusion product analysis showed the presence of effector memory cells with high expression of CD39 irrespective of tumor type. Early on-treatment biopsy of PDAC patient with prolonged SD showed presence of proliferating (KI67+) CD4+ and CD8+ TIL. Conclusions: Generation of TIL at a single academic center for CRC, PDAC and OVA is feasible and treatment is associated with no new safety signals. For these tumor types, further research is required to identify host factors associated with resistance to TIL therapy and optimize manufacturing processes to create more effective TIL cell therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03610490.

3598 Background: Treatment with encorafenib (E) and cetuximab (C) offers response and survival benefit for patients (pts) with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). BRAF + EGFR inhibition induced a transient MSI-H phenotype in preclinical models of MSS, BRAFV600E CRC and may prime these tumors for response to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies like nivolumab (N). Methods: In this single-arm, single-institution, phase I/II clinical trial, pts with treatment-refractory MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC were eligible. No prior BRAF, MEK, or ERK inhibitors, anti-EGFR antibody, or immunotherapy was permitted. Pts received E (300 mg PO daily), C (500 mg/m2 IV q14 days), and N (480 mg IV q28 days). The primary endpoints were best overall response (RECIST 1.1) and safety/tolerability (CTCAE v5). A Simon two-stage design (H0: p≤.22; Ha: p≥.45, where p = percentage of pts with radiographic response) was employed using a one-sided α =.05 and β =.20. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated via Kaplan-Meier. To measure ex vivo treatment responses with an E-slice assay (EMPIRI), 300 µm fresh tissue slices from core biopsies were generated and cultured in serum-free media with E, C, and N. Longitudinal changes in viability were measured at days 4, 8, and 12 and compared to baseline viability in each tissue. Ex vivo “response” was defined if < 1X baseline tumor cell viability. Results: With a data cutoff of 2/8/2022, all pts are enrolled: 26 evaluable for toxicity and 23 for response. Median age is 60 years (range, 32-85), and 16 (62%) are female. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (AE) have occurred in 5/26 (19%) patients: colitis, maculopapular rash, leukocytosis, and myositis/myocarditis (all N = 1); asymptomatic elevated amylase/lipase (N = 2). Overall response rate is 48% (95% CI, 27-69), and disease control rate is 96% (95% CI, 78-100). Median PFS is 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.6-NA). For the 11 pts with responses, median duration of response is 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.5-NA). Median OS is 15.1 months (95% CI, 7.7-NA). E-slices showed concordance between pts with radiographic responses and reduction in cell viability, and between non-responders and increase in cell viability. Final results will be presented. Conclusions: E + C + N appears to be effective and well-tolerated for pts with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC. Ex vivo analysis of pretreatment tissue predicted eventual clinical response in matched patients. A follow-up randomized phase II trial (SWOG 2107) to evaluate encorafenib/cetuximab with or without nivolumab in pts with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC will activate in 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04017650.

3520 Background: In RAS/RAF WT colorectal cancer (CRC), rechallenge with anti-EGFR therapy (EGFRi) in patients (pts) with prior response leads to clinical benefit, with response rates up to 30% in prior trials. However, secondary MTs in the MAPK signaling pathway have been implicated in resistance to EGFRi. We designed a phase 2 trial to evaluate the efficacy of EGFRi rechallenge +/- a MEK inhibitor (trametinib) based on pre-treatment ctDNA MTs. Methods: This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of EGFRi rechallenge +/- trametinib in pts with RAS/BRAF WT, MSS, treatment refractory mCRC who achieved clinical benefit with prior EGFRi based therapy for ≥16 weeks with subsequent progression. Pre study ctDNA was used to enroll in one of 3 arms: Arm A: Pts with an acquired EGFR ECD MT but absence of RAS/BRAF/MAP2K1 or with absence of any acquired resistance MT (Arm C) at time of study initiation received panitumumab 6 mg/kg IV Q2 wks. Arm B: Pts with an acquired RAS/BRAF/MAP2K1 MT received panitumumab 4.8 mg/kg plus trametinib 1.5 mg PO daily. Pts in Arms A and C were allowed to cross over on progression. The primary endpoint was ORR by RECIST v1.1. Results: 54 pts were enrolled, with 52 evaluable for efficacy. Median age is 59 yrs (range, 37-78), and 23 (46%) are female. Median number of prior therapies was 3. Three, 20, and 31 pts were enrolled in Arms A, B, C, respectively. Grade 3 TREAs occurred in 29 (54%) pts (all receiving the doublet regimen) and included acneiform rash in 17 (31%) and others occurring in < 5% of pts. There were no grade 4 TRAEs. In pts with no acquired MTs (Arm C), ORR was 20% (6/30) (95% CI, 0.07-0.37), DCR 67% (20/30) (95% CI, 0.45- 0.81), and median PFS and OS 4.1 mo and 11.2 mo, respectively. The median DOR was 5.5 mo. 22 patients crossed over to add trametinib at time of progression, without any responses. In contrast, in pts with acquired RAS/RAF/MAP2K1 MTs (Arm B), there were no responses, with DCR of 63% (12/19) (95% CI, 0.36-0.81), and median PFS and OS 2.1 mo and 5.9 mo, respectively. Only 3 pts were identified with EGFR ECD MTs (Arm A), and ORR is 0% (0/3) in this cohort, with DCR 67% (2/3) (95% CI, 0.09-0.99). Pts with PR had a longer median interval from prior EGFRi and longer time on prior EGFRi than those with SD+PD (5.5 vs 3.6 mo; p = 0.03, and 9.5 vs. 8.8 mo; p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: CtDNA guided rechallenge leads to responses in 20% of pts without acquired resistance MTs, with DCR of 67%. This exceeds current third line standard options. While panitumumab has the potential to block EGFR ECD mutations arising from cetuximab, these mutations in isolation were uncommon and there were no signals of efficacy. Although the acneiform rash induced by the combination of MEK and EGFR inhibition was manageable with close dermatologic management, the combination failed to improve outcomes for pts with acquired resistance. Alternative approaches to downstream MAPK blockade should be explored to improve outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT03087071.

4010 Background: Preclinical and small clinical studies of chemoimmunotherapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) point to a yet unrealized potential of clinically significant immune activation. In our phase II study of the CD40 agonist antibody sotigalimab (sotiga) and/or nivolumab (nivo) with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (chemo), we observed promising improvements in overall survival (OS) in 105 patients with newly diagnosed mPDAC (NCT03214250); the primary endpoint of 1-year OS rate was 57.7% (p = 0.006) in the nivo/chemo arm, 48.1% (p = 0.062) in the sotiga/chemo arm and 41.3% (p = 0.233) in the nivo/sotiga/chemo arm (O’Hara, ASCO 2021) as compared to a historical control of 35%. Here, we report results of multi-omic translational analyses designed to identify signatures predictive of OS benefit. Methods: Longitudinal blood and tumor tissue samples were collected for immune and tumor biomarker analysis. Tumor samples underwent RNA sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF). Peripheral blood was analyzed by mass cytometry time of flight (CyTOF), high parameter flow cytometry, and proteomics. Machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied to the data to identify biosignatures related to OS in each arm. Results: Comprehensive multi-omic, multi-parameter immune and tumor biomarker analyses identified distinct pretreatment immune signatures predictive of longer OS specific to nivo/chemo or sotiga/chemo (Table, representative examples). Because patients in each arm received chemotherapy, these and other arm-unique biomarkers suggest a relationship to the immunotherapy rather than chemotherapy in this randomized study. There was evidence of immune exhaustion in the sotiga/nivo/chemo arm that may explain the lack of survival benefit. Conclusions: From in-depth translational and ML analyses of randomized phase II trial of first-line chemoimmunotherapy in mPDAC patients, we identified novel biomarkers that associated with OS distinctly in each arm. Clinical trials in first-line mPDAC exploiting these previously unappreciated biomarkers and aiming to enrich patients for response, are warranted to further advance chemoimmunotherapy in this disease. Clinical trial information: NCT03214250. [Table: see text]

3592 Background: While BRAFV600E accounts for the majority of BRAF mutations in mCRC, non-V600 BRAF variants (a BRAF) have emerged in recent years as a distinct molecular subtype. There are no consensus recommendations regarding management. This study provides a comprehensive profile of a BRAF, their clonalities and co-mutations in mCRC using a large genomic database as well as a prospective treatment cohort of patients with a BRAF and mCRC managed at a single center. Methods: A systematic analysis was performed of patients with mCRC who underwent ctDNA testing (Guardant360 platform, Guardant Health) from September 2014 to May 2021. A variant was defined as clonal if the mutant allele frequency (MAF) was greater than 50% of the highest somatic MAF in the sample; otherwise it was defined as subclonal. Co-mutation analysis was conducted with BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, NF1, ERBB2, PIK3CA and SMAD4. Treatment history and overall survival (OS) for patients with a BRAF mCRC from MD Anderson Cancer Center were included. Results: 1,733 out of 14,742 mCRC patients had at least one BRAF variant, including 6.5% of patients with BRAFV600E variants and 6.2% with a BRAF variants (1.1% with class II, 1.9% with class III, and 3.2% with unclassified variants). 431 unique BRAF variants were identified in a total of 1,905 BRAF variants. BRAF class II and III variants showed a higher rate of co-occurring KRAS mutations (25.6% and 21.5%) and co-occurring NRAS mutations (5.8% and 2.7%) compared with BRAFV600E variants (2.4% for KRAS and 0.1% for NRAS); however, co-occurring KRAS G12C was only noted in one patient. In our MDACC cohort, 38 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 55, 81% were Caucasian, and 74 % had left sided primary tumors (45% rectal, 24% sigmoid) with 37% being exposed to at least 2 lines of therapy. The most common mutations in clinical practice were class III, D594G (39%), followed by class II G469A (10%), & class III G466E (7%). The median follow-up time was 23.8 months (mo). While there were no survival differences between a BRAF classes II and III, there was a significant difference in OS in patients with RAS co-mutation (28.3 mo vs not reached [NR], p = 0.05) or liver involvement (28.8 mo vs NR, p = 0.02). Patients < 50 years of age had extremely poor survival with OS of 16.3 mo (vs. NR) and HR 7.51 (95% CI 1.82-31.0, p = 0.005). Treatment with anti-EGFR or use of metastasectomy was not associated with improved survival. Conclusions: a BRAF mutations have historically been considered a favorable prognostic marker in mCRC. Co-mutation with RAS is frequent for both classes and portends poor survival in our real-world cohort. Furthermore, early onset a BRAF mCRC is associated with more aggressive disease. These factors highlight the need for dedicated clinical trials for this unique subset of mCRC and may represent an opportunity to improve management in early onset colorectal cancer.

2548 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly used as a prognostic marker with high ctDNA shedding associated with poor survival. Gene-, but not variant-specific, differences in ctDNA shedding have been reported. Tumor burden, mitotic rate, and cell death rate have been proposed as contributors to ctDNA shedding. Here we investigate associations of ctDNA shedding for the two most common mPDAC KRAS variants, G12D and G12V, with tumor burden, mitotic score, and overall survival (OS). Methods: Pretreatment (baseline) ctDNA was analyzed by droplet digital PCR for 86 (including 44 G12D, 30 G12V) patients with mPDAC receiving front-line chemoimmunotherapy in a randomized open-label Phase II study (NCT03214250). Baseline tumor burden in total, within the pancreas, and distally, was assessed by sum of RECIST target lesion diameters. Tumor tissue variant allele fraction (tVAF) and mitotic score (geometric mean expression of 65 mitosis-associated genes) were calculated from DNA and RNA sequencing. Results: ctKRAS shedding (dichotomized at median mutant copies/mL) was associated with OS for G12D bearing tumors (p = 0.03) but not G12V (p = 0.17, log-rank test). To identify variant-specific features of shedding, we examined the Spearman correlation for total tumor burden and ctKRAS shedding; G12D but not G12V shedding was correlated with tumor burden (p = 0.01 and p = 0.22 respectively). However, the higher tVAF in G12V compared to G12D tumors (p = 0.048, Mann-Whitney test) could result from differences in purity, ploidy, and KRAS copy number. Thus, we used tVAF as a scalar to calculate an adjusted tumor burden which was significantly correlated with both G12D and G12V ctDNA shedding (p = 0.004 and 0.02, respectively). When a patient’s distal vs. pancreatic lesions were analyzed separately, pancreatic tumor burden was not correlated with G12D or G12V shedding (p = 0.10 and 0.33, respectively) but distal burden was correlated with both (p = 0.001 and 0.02, respectively). While there was no difference by KRAS variant for the correlation between adjusted tumor burden and shedding, these results do suggest that, in patients with mPDAC, distal rather than primary tumor burden may drive ctDNA shedding. Finally, tumor mitotic rate was combined with adjusted total tumor burden in a linear regression model; both were significant for predicting G12D shedding (p = 0.007 and p < 0.0001, respectively) but not for G12V (p = 0.045 and p = 0.16, respectively). Conclusions: These data suggest that ctDNA shedding and survival associations may be KRAS variant-specific in mPDAC. Tumor mitotic score and location of tumors may explain some variant-specific differences in shedding. As clinical ctDNA tests become more widely used, further investigation of variant-specific shedding in KRAS and other genes may be key for proper interpretation of ctDNA tests.

Purpose: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a heterogeneous disease with variable presentations and natural histories of disease. We hypothesized that different morphologic characteristics of PDAC tumors on diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans would reflect their underlying biology. Experimental Design: We developed a quantitative method to categorize the PDAC morphology on pretherapy CT scans from multiple datasets of patients with resectable and metastatic disease and correlated these patterns with clinical/pathologic measurements. We modeled macroscopic lesion growth computationally to test the effects of stroma on morphologic patterns, hypothesizing that the balance of proliferation and local migration rates of the cancer cells would determine tumor morphology. Results: In localized and metastatic PDAC, quantifying the change in enhancement on CT scans at the interface between tumor and parenchyma (delta) demonstrated that patients with conspicuous (high-delta) tumors had significantly less stroma, higher likelihood of multiple common pathway mutations, more mesenchymal features, higher likelihood of early distant metastasis, and shorter survival times compared with those with inconspicuous (low-delta) tumors. Pathologic measurements of stromal and mesenchymal features of the tumors supported the mathematical model's underlying theory for PDAC growth. Conclusions: At baseline diagnosis, a visually striking and quantifiable CT imaging feature reflects the molecular and pathological heterogeneity of PDAC, and may be used to stratify patients into distinct subtypes. Moreover, growth patterns of PDAC may be described using physical principles, enabling new insights into diagnosis and treatment of this deadly disease.

IMPORTANCE: The subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer (PDAC) with DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiency from BRCA1/2 variants has a favorable prognosis and is sensitive to platinum analogues and poly–(adenosine diphosphate–ripose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition with olaparib. Approximately 10% to 20% of patients with PDAC have DDR genetic alterations other than germline BRCA variants. This population has been termed as having BRCAness. An opportunity exists to define the clinical phenotype, molecular underpinnings, and effectiveness of PARP inhibitors for this population. OBJECTIVE: To examine the therapeutic effectiveness of the PARP inhibitor olaparib for patients with pancreatic cancer with BRCAness. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two parallel phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trials were conducted from November 11, 2016, to October 2, 2018, among 46 patients in Israel and Texas to determine the effectiveness of olaparib as monotherapy in advanced, previously treated PDAC with BRCAness. Inclusion criteria were treatment with 1 or more prior systemic therapies for advanced PDAC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, and lack of the germline BRCA1/2 variant. BRCAness in these studies was defined as previously known DDR genetic alterations (DDR-GAs), personal or family history of BRCA-associated cancers (without DDR-GAs), or ATM protein loss as determined by immunohistochemistry. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary study end point was the objective response rate, and the secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were enrolled, and 46 (26 women [57%]; mean [SD] age, 65.5 [11.1] years) were evaluable. The median treatment duration with olaparib was 3.0 months (interquartile range, 1.8-6.4 months). A total of 24 patients had the DDR phenotype (DDR-GAs), 17 had a family history of BRCA-associated cancers without DDR-GAs, and 5 had ATM loss as determined by immunohistochemistry. The DDR-GAs included ATM (n = 14), PALB2 (n = 2), ARID1A (n = 3), BRCA somatic (n = 1), PTEN (n = 1), RAD51 (n = 1), CCNE (n = 1), and FANCB (n = 2). Common toxic effects were grade 1 to 2 anemia, fatigue, anorexia, and nausea. One patient had a confirmed partial response (2%), 33 patients experienced stable disease (72%), of whom 11 (24%) experienced disease stability longer than 4 months and 12 patients had progressive disease (26%). The response duration for the patient with confirmed partial response was 3.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.9-5.7) and was significantly higher for patients with DDR-GAs (5.7 months; 95% CI, 3.6-8.8 months; P = .008) and platinum-sensitive PDAC (4.1 months; 95% CI, 3.6-7.8 months; P = .01). The estimated median OS was 9.9 months (95% CI, 7.6-16.1 months) in the study and 13.6 months (95% CI, 9.69 to not reached) in the prespecified DDR-GA cohort. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The definition of the BRCAness phenotype in PDAC may be limited to patients harboring DDR-GAs. In these 2 phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trials, olaparib was well tolerated and showed limited antitumor activity in patients with advanced, platinum-sensitive PDAC with DDR-GAs. These conclusions suggest a potential therapeutic opportunity for a subset of patients with PDAC.

BACKGROUND: CD73, a newly recognized immune checkpoint mediator, is expressed in several types of malignancies. However, CD73 expression and its impact on tumor microenvironment and clinical outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain unclear. METHODS: This study included two cohorts: 138 patients from our institution (MDA) and 176 patients from TCGA dataset. CD73 expression, CD4+, CD8+, CD21+ and CD45RO+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were evaluated by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays. The results of CD73 expression were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters, survival and TILs. RESULTS: CD73 overexpression correlated with poorly differentiation (P = 0.002) and tumor size (P = 0.049). For CD73-low group, median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 26.9 ± 3.8 months and 12.6 ± 2.6 months, respectively, compared to 16.9 ± 4.4 months (P = 0.01) and 7.9 ± 1.2 months (P = 0.01), respectively, in CD73-high group. CD73 was an independent predictor for both RFS (P = 0.015) and OS (P = 0.01) by multivariate variate analysis. Similarly, CD73-high tumors had significantly shorter OS than CD73-low tumors in TCGA dataset (P < 0.0001). CD73-high correlated with decreased CD4+ TILs in MDA cohort and decreased CD8A and CR2 (CD21) expression in TCGA cohort. CONCLUSIONS: CD73 overexpression is associated with poor differentiation, tumor size, and shorter survival, and is an independent prognostic factor in PDAC patients. CD73 overexpression is associated with decreased CD4+, CD8+ and CD21+ TILs. Our data support that CD73 plays an important role in immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and promote tumor progression in PDAC.

Previously, we characterized qualitative imaging-based subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) on computed tomography (CT) scans. Conspicuous (high delta) PDAC tumors are more likely to have aggressive biology and poorer clinical outcomes compared to inconspicuous (low delta) tumors. Here, we developed a quantitative classification of this imaging-based subtype (quantitative delta, q-delta). Retrospectively, baseline pancreatic protocol CT scans of three cohorts (cohort#1 = 101, cohort#2 = 90 and cohort#3 = 16 [external validation]) of patients with PDAC were qualitatively classified into high and low delta. We used a voxel-based method to volumetrically quantify tumor enhancement while referencing normal-pancreatic-parenchyma and used machine learning-based analysis to build a predictive model. In addition, we quantified the stromal content using hematoxylin- and eosin-stained treatment-na&iuml, ve PDAC sections. Analyses revealed that PDAC quantitative enhancement values are predictive of the qualitative delta scoring and were used to build a classification model (q-delta). Compared to high q-delta, low q-delta tumors were associated with improved outcomes, and the q-delta class was an independent prognostic factor for survival. In addition, low q-delta tumors had higher stromal content and lower cellularity compared to high q-delta tumors. Our results suggest that q-delta classification provides a clinically and biologically relevant tool that may be integrated into ongoing and future clinical trials.

Objective Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy with limited evidence regarding outcomes after curative resection of localised disease. We aimed to evaluate presentation and prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and recurrence of SBA. Methods Consecutive patients with completely resected localised SBA (1979–2019) were retrospectively reviewed for presentation, patient and tumour characteristics, perioperative treatment, recurrence, outcomes, and prognostic factors. Results Among 257 total patients, median age was 58 years. Primary location was in the duodenum, jejunum and ileum in 52%, 29%, and 19% of patients, respectively. Median OS was 57.5 months and median follow-up was 40 months. In multivariate analysis, lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, histologic grade and race were independent predictors of RFS, while race, stage and histologic grade were independent predictors of OS. No significant difference in OS or RFS was seen when evaluating the role of perioperative treatment. Median time to diagnosis from first medical evaluation was 31 days and did not change over time. Overall recurrence rate was 56%. Recurrence rate was higher in ileal (77%), than duodenal (54%) and jejunal (65%) SBA (p=0.01). Recurrence presented most commonly as distant metastasis (71%). Proficient mismatch repair was associated with decreased risk of locoregional recurrence (LR) but increased risk of distant recurrence (DR) when compared with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in univariate analysis. Conclusions Despite advances in diagnostic modalities, this study did not show any improvement in earlier diagnosis of SBA over the course of the past three decades. The predominant pattern of disease recurrence was distant across all SBA locations, but dMMR status demonstrated a robust predilection for LR as opposed to DR. Perioperative treatment did not improve outcomes; however, a lower stage disease was seen in patients that received neoadjuvant therapy, suggesting further exploration of this approach.

TPS633 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with few effective therapeutic options. Over 90% of patients with PDAC harbor activating mutations in KRAS, a known oncogenic driver of tumor growth, cancer cell survival and metastasis thus making for an attractive therapeutic target. However, targeting the most common KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer (KRASG12D and KRASG12V) remains a pharmacological challenge. Exosomes are extracellular nano-vesicles that are efficiently internalized by target cells and are under investigation as a drug-delivery vehicle for various therapeutic payloads, including nucleic acids such as small interfering RNA (siRNA). Previously published pre-clinical data demonstrate effective delivery of exosomes loaded with siRNA targeting KRASG12D leading to tumor control in various murine models of PDAC. Methods: This is a single arm, single institution, phase I trial evaluating treatment with KRASG12D-siRNA loaded exosomes. Large-scale production of KRASG12D-siRNA loaded exosomes from mesenchymal stromal cells will be performed at the MD Anderson Cancer Center using pre-specified GMP-compliant protocols. The primary endpoints of this study are to determine a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of KRASG12D-loaded exosomes and to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Key secondary endpoints include the pharmacokinetics of circulating exosomes, overall response rate, disease control rate (defined as partial responses and patients with stable disease), median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS). Key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, documented progression on one or more lines of systemic therapy, and documented presence of a KRASG12D mutation. Selected correlative studies include measurement of circulating siRNA and KRASG12D DNA using PCR. This trial will enroll up to 28 patients and will follow a 3+3 design for dose escalation. This trial is actively accruing and has enrolled six patients at the time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT03608631.

TPS634 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating malignancy with a dearth of effective therapeutic options. Over 90% of PDAC harbor activating mutations in the KRAS oncoprotein, which in turn leads to activation of downstream effector proteins in the the RAF-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade serving to promote tumor cell survival, growth and metastasis. Unfortunately, single agent treatment with MAPK-inhibitors have had limited therapeutic efficacy in patients with PDAC owing to development of various tumor-cell intrinsic resistance mechanisms, including upregulation of autophagy. Hydroxychloroquine is an antimalarial drug that functions to inhibit autophagy by inhibiting acidification of lysosomes. Previously published preclinical data suggest combination therapy with binimetinib, a MEK 1/2 inhibitor, and hydroxychloroquine leads to enhanced killing of PDAC cells in vitro and in vivo. Methods: This is a single arm, single center phase I trial of binimetinib plus hydroxychloroquine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer harboring a KRAS mutation. All patients will receive binimetinib at a fixed dose of 45mg PO twice daily (14-day cycles) while hydroxychloroquine will be dosed at 400mg PO twice daily (14-day cycles) and dose escalated using a Bayesian optimal interval design with a target toxicity rate of 0.3. Key eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, prior treatment with at least one line of systemic therapy and a documented KRAS mutation. An estimated 24 patients will be enrolled in the first phase of this study and up to 15 patients in the dose expansion cohort. The primary endpoint of this study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of hydroxychloroquine when combined with a fixed dose of binimetinib. Key secondary endpoints include safety and toxicity profile, response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This study is ongoing and has enrolled 10 patients at the time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT04132505.

577 Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have altered the treatment landscape of various solid tumors, but clinical outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continue to remain dismal. Data are needed to determine prognostic factors of survival to ICI-therapies in pancreatic cancer to better inform future recruitment in immunotherapy-based early clinical trials. Methods: This is a single center, retrospective analysis of patients with PDAC treated with ICI-based therapy as part of phase I trials at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients enrolled in a phase I study and treated between 2014 to 2021 were included in the analysis. Descriptive analysis included patient characteristics, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards were used to assess associations between patient or tumor characteristics and survival endpoints. Results: One hundred and twenty-two patients were included in this study and received a median of two prior lines of therapy (IQR 1-3). The most commonly utilized ICI were PD-L1 inhibitors (56%) and PD-1 inhibitors (34%). Most patients (96%) received ICI in combination with another investigational agent and 9% of patients received ICI in combination with chemotherapy. The median duration of treatment was 1.38 months (IQR 0.69-2.56). The median PFS was 1.81 months (95% CI 1.78-2.04) and the median OS was 4.83 months (95% CI 4.08-5.92). Univariate analysis showed improved PFS in patients with an albumin of ≥3.5 (1.94 vs 1.32 months, HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14-0.60, p = 0.001) and Hgb ≥10.5 (1.87 vs 1.81 months, HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.4-0.98, p = 0.039); a longer OS was demonstrated in patients who had lung only metastases (7.92 vs. 4.18 months, HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.21-0.76, p = 0.006), albumin ≥3.5 (5.52 vs. 1.68 months, HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8, p = 0.010), and a Hgb ≥10.5 (5.29 vs 4.11 months, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.93, p = 0.022). Patients with an ANC/ALC ratio of ≥5 had a shorter OS compared to patients with an ANC/ALC ratio of < 5 (3.98 vs 6.54 months, HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.17-2.69, p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis showed that an albumin ≥3.5 predicted improved PFS (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.90, p = 0.026) and an ANC/ALC ratio of ≥5 predicted shorter OS (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.59-4.19, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Results of this large, single center retrospective study demonstrate that most patients with PDAC treated with ICI based therapies as a part of early phase clinical trials experience disease progression shortly after initiation of therapy and have a limited overall survival. Pretreatment albumin ≥3.5 predicted improved PFS and ANC/ALC ratio ≥5 predicted shorter OS.

12 Background: Encorafenib (E) and cetuximab (C) offers short-lived response and survival benefit for patients (pts) with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). BRAF + EGFR inhibition induced a transient MSI-H phenotype in preclinical models of MSS, BRAFV600E CRC and may prime these tumors for response to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies like nivolumab (N). Methods: In this single-arm, single-institution, phase I/II clinical trial, pts with treatment-refractory MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC were eligible. No prior BRAF inhibitors, anti-EGFR antibody, or immunotherapy was permitted. Pts received E (300 mg PO daily), C (500 mg/m2 IV q14 days), and N (480 mg IV q28 days). The primary endpoints were best overall response (RECIST 1.1) and safety/tolerability (CTCAE v5). A Simon two-stage design (H0: p≤.22; Ha: p≥.45, where p= percentage of pts with radiographic response) was employed using a one-sided α=.05 and β=.20. In the first stage, ≥ 4/15 responses were needed in order for the trial to enroll 11 additional pts. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated via Kaplan-Meier. Results: All 26 pts have been enrolled - 23 patients treated, and 21 evaluable for response so far. Median age is 59 years (range, 32-85), and 14 (54%) are female. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (AE) occurred in 4/22 (18%) patients. Grade 3 AEs included colitis, maculopapular rash, leukocytosis, and elevated amylase/lipase (all N=1). Grade 4 AEs in a single patient were myositis/myocarditis. Overall response rate is 45% (95% CI, 23-68), and disease control rate is 95% (95% CI, 75-100). Median PFS is 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.5-NA). Median OS is 11.4 months (95% CI, 7.6-NA). For the 9 pts thus far with responses, median duration of response is 8.1 months (95% CI, 7.3-NA). Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: E + C + N is effective and well-tolerated for pts with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC. The E+C+N regimen met its predefined efficacy endpoint and suggests a role for immunotherapy as a novel combination approach for this specific subpopulation of MSS metastatic CRC. A follow-up randomized phase II trial (SWOG 2107) to evaluate encorafenib/cetuximab with or without nivolumab in pts with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC will activate in early 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04017650.

Background The assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) response to therapy remains challenging. The objective of this study was to investigate whether changes in the tumor/parenchyma interface are associated with response. Methods Computed tomography (CT) scans before and after therapy were reviewed in 4 cohorts: cohort 1 (99 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery); cohort 2 (86 patients with stage IV PDAC who received chemotherapy), cohort 3 (94 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received protocol-based neoadjuvant gemcitabine chemoradiation), and cohort 4 (47 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and were prospectively followed in a registry). The tumor/parenchyma interface was visually classified as either a type I response (the interface remained or became well defined) or a type II response (the interface became poorly defined) after therapy. Consensus (cohorts 1-3) and individual (cohort 4) visual scoring was performed. Changes in enhancement at the interface were quantified using a proprietary platform. Results In cohort 1, type I responders had a greater probability of achieving a complete or near-complete pathologic response (21% vs 0%; P = .01). For cohorts 1, 2, and 3, type I responders had significantly longer disease-free and overall survival, independent of traditional covariates of outcomes and of baseline and normalized cancer antigen 19-9 levels. In cohort 4, 2 senior radiologists achieved a κ value of 0.8, and the interface score was associated with overall survival. The quantitative method revealed high specificity and sensitivity in classifying patients as type I or type II responders (with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.92 in cohort 1, 0.96 in cohort 2, and 0.89 in cohort 3). Conclusions Changes at the PDAC/parenchyma interface may serve as an early predictor of response to therapy. Cancer 2018;124:1701-9. © 2018 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Currently, treatment of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) mirrors that of colorectal cancer (CRC). Recent genomic data have demonstrated SBA to be a genetically unique entity, suggesting that therapies not traditionally utilized in CRC should be explored. In order to further characterize the activity of taxanes in this rare cancer, we completed a single-center retrospective study. Twenty patients were found to have been treated with taxane-based regimens (monotherapy in 3, combination therapy in 17). Median time to progression was 3.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9–4.6), and median overall survival was 10.7 months (95% CI: 3.1–18.3). The results of this study demonstrate clinical activity from taxane-based therapy in advanced SBA and support further clinical trial investigation.

BackgroundPancreatic cancer (PaC) is immune-quiescent and resistant to single-agent checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). NT-I7 (efineptakin alfa) is the first-in-class long-acting IL-7 that can increase T-cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and may enhance tumor responsiveness to CPI therapy. We hypothesize that the combination of NT-I7 and pembrolizumab may result in enhanced efficacy in CPI-naïve advanced PaC.MethodsThis is an open-label, phase 2a, study in subjects with relapsed/refractory (R/R) tumors, including CPI-naïve R/R PaC. Subjects received NT-I7 intramuscularly at 1200 µg/kg every 6 weeks (Q6W) plus pembro 200 mg intravenously Q3W. Antitumor activity based on Overall Response Rate (ORR) was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Biomarker analyses of peripheral blood and tumor biopsies were performed.ResultsAs of 15-July-2021, 26 subjects were enrolled in the CPI naïve R/R PaC cohort. Median age 69 years [31–81], ECOG PS 0 (35%), 1 (65%). Twenty-one (81%) subjects had ≥ 2 prior therapies All subjects had metastatic or locally advanced disease at enrollment. The median duration of follow-up was 3.3 months. Among 10 subjects with at least 1 post-treatment tumor assessment, the RECIST1.1-based ORR and disease-control rate (DCR) were 10% and 50%, respectively. One subject with MSS and TMB of 1, achieved a confirmed partial response (cPR) with 65% tumor reduction and drastically improving CA19-9. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 14 (53.8%) subjects, 9 (34.6%) G1–2, 3 (11.5%) G3; 2 (7.7%) G4; no G5 AEs were reported. No subjects discontinued from treatment due to AE. NT-I7 + pembro elicited a significant increase in the peripheral absolute lymphocyte count that peaked at week 3 (>3X from baseline, p15X, pConclusionsThe chemo-free combination of NT-I7 + pembro was well tolerated and showed promising anti-tumor activity in subjects with CPI-naïve R/R PaC. Increased TSCM and CD8+ T-cell infiltration within TME may be the underlying mechanisms of action for the observed efficacy. These results support continued evaluation of NT-I7 + pembro in subjects with CPI-naïve R/R PaC.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank ICON for their partnership in conducting this trial.Trial RegistrationNCT04332653Ethics ApprovalThe trial was approved by MD Anderson IRB (#2020–0008_MOD001), Mary Crowley IRB (#20–13) and Advarra IRB (#Pro00042639)All participant gave informed consent prior to study enrollment.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) The role of RT remains controversial in treating BRPC and LAPC following Alliance A021501 and LAP07. These studies shifted our institutional practice to more selective use of RT, whereas in the past, we most often consolidated with RT after chemotherapy (chemo). We reviewed our experience using modern multi-agent chemo with or without RT. MATERIALS/METHODS We utilized a retrospective registry to analyze 454 pts (240 M, 214 F, median age 65 [28 - 89]) who were diagnosed with BRPC (n = 172) or LAPC (n = 282) between 2011 to 2019 and who underwent chemo alone (n = 167) or chemo then RT (n = 287). For those pts who received RT, the median dose and fractionation was 50 Gy (30 - 98 Gy) and 15 fractions (4 - 28). Median biological effective dose was 60 Gy (33 - 132 Gy). All pts received FOLFIRINOX (n = 274) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP, n = 180). Associations between chemo regimen (FOLFIRINOX vs. GnP), resection (surgery vs. no surgery), CA19-9 response (normalized vs. not vs. not applicable [N/A]), and other demographic characteristics were tested using the likelihood-ratio. CA19-9 normalizers were defined by the minimum CA19-9 value between the start of chemo and 6 mos post-chemo start that was < 40 U/mL. Pts were classified as N/A if the pt either had an abnormal bilirubin level or a CA19-9 < 40 U/mL at baseline, or were missing CA19-9 data. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards tests were used for survival analyses. RESULTS For all pts, median overall survival (OS) was 17.5 mos and median distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) was 11.5 mos. The chemo then RT group had a greater proportion of pts who received FOLFIRINOX than the chemo only group (64% vs 54%, P = 0.03). The chemo then RT group also had a greater percentage of pts who went to surgery than the chemo alone group (33% vs 16%, P < 0.0001). Pts with BRPC were more likely to receive surgery than pts with LAPC (48% vs. 14%, P < 0.0001). Univariate analyses showed that baseline stage (BRPC vs LAPC), surgery, CA19-9 response, and receipt of chemo then RT were associated with both OS and DMFS. Chemo regimen was associated with OS but not DMFS on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified that surgery, CA19-9 response, and receipt of chemo then RT were independent prognostic factors for both OS and DMFS (Table). Multivariate analysis of only LAPC showed the same associations with OS and DMFS as with all pts. CONCLUSION RT following chemo was associated with better OS and DMFS compared with chemo alone in a modern retrospective BRPC and LAPC cohort. Additional studies are needed to clarify the role of RT.

BackgroundGemcitabine/nab-Paclitaxel (GnP) is a standard of care regimen for first-line metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and has a 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of approximately 35%. There is an urgent need for novel therapeutics and precision medicine approaches in PDAC. PRINCE, a randomized phase 2 trial, reported an increased 1-year OS relative to historical data, for patients treated with nivolumab (nivo)/GnP (57.3%, p = 0.007, n=34) and sotigalimab (sotiga) (APX005M; CD40 agonist)/GnP (48.1%, p = 0.062, n= 36).MethodsTo investigate immune modulatory and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of nivo or sotiga in combination with GnP we used several orthogonal minimally invasive, blood-based biomarker technologies. Immune population profiles were evaluated by CyTOF and features of T cell phenotype and function by multicolor flow cytometry. Soluble proteins were evaluated with predefined panels using the Olink platform (Immuno-oncology (IO) and Immune Response) along with an unbiased mass spectrometry proteomic approach (Biognosys) that identified circulating soluble proteins of significance.ResultsRelative to baseline, patients who received nivo/GnP had numerically increased frequencies of proliferating, activated CD8+ and CD4+ effector memory T cells in circulation across multiple timepoints. These patients also had significantly increased levels of soluble proteins associated with type II interferon responses and immune cell migration and T cell activation, as well as significantly decreased levels of immunomodulatory proteins.Patients who received sotiga/GnP had increased expression of the co-stimulatory molecule CD86 on conventional dendritic cells. These patients also had significantly increased concentrations of soluble proteins associated with mature antigen presenting cells, and the activation of helper CD4+ T cells, B cells, and monocytes. Significant increases in soluble proteins associated with type-1 cell-mediated effector immunity and decreases in immunosuppressive factors were observed in both arms. Significant proteins were defined as p ≤ 0.05, log2 expression fold change ≥ 0.5 (Olink) and Sparse PLS discriminant analysis was used with zero as a threshold (Biognosys).ConclusionsThis study is a first to use multiomic minimally invasive biomarker approaches in PDAC to demonstrate PD effects and immune modulation with immunotherapy/chemotherapy combinations. Orthogonal assays demonstrate that nivo/GnP and sotiga/GnP elicit unique immune responses and the observed effects are consistent with their distinct mechanisms of action. These data suggest that multiomic biomarker signatures may identify subsets of patients who may benefit from an immunotherapy/chemo approach in PDAC. Moreover, results from these analyses will support early phase clinical study development decisions.AcknowledgementsWe extend our gratitude to the patients, their families, the clinical investigators, and their site staff members who are making this trial possible. We would also like to thank Sultan Nawabi at Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy (PICI) for operations leadership of the trial. We thank Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) and Apexigen for collaboration and study drugs. The study was funded by Cancer Research Institute, BMS and PICI.Trial RegistrationNCT03214250Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board; Federalwide assurance #00004028.

Background Metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) has a poor prognosis. Due to its rarity, high-quality data are lacking to guide treatment. This retrospective analysis was conducted to help characterize the treatment options for patients with metastatic SBA while providing clinically meaningful prognostic information. Patients and methods In total, 437 patients who initially presented with or developed metastatic SBA between September 1977 and September 2019 were identified from the MD Anderson Tumor Registry. Clinical data were collected from review of the medical record. Overall response rates (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) were assessed across various treatments and treatment lines. Results The median OS from diagnosis of metastatic disease was 15.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.3-17.9]. Seventy-five patients (17.1%) underwent metastasectomy, which was associated with a median OS of 34.5 versus 17.1 months among patients who received chemotherapy alone (P < 0.001). Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum (n = 164) was the most common first-line chemotherapy, associated with an ORR of 59% and TTP of 8.1 months. Irinotecan with 5-FU (n = 101) was the most common second-line therapy associated with an ORR of 31% and TTP of 4.0 months. Twenty-two patients received immunotherapy; 5 of 6 patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) responded, while 0 of 16 with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) responded. Taxane-based chemotherapy was given to 34 patients with an ORR of 21% and a median TTP of 2.4 months. Among 11 patients who received anti-epidermal-growth-factor-receptor (EGFR) monotherapy, the best response was stable disease (SD) in 1 patient. Conclusions In well-selected patients with SBA, metastasectomy appears to be associated with improved OS. This improvement was seen across metastasectomy sites, including liver, lung and peritoneal. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) based immunotherapy was active for dMMR SBA but not pMMR SBA. While taxane-based chemotherapy demonstrates therapeutic activity, the activity of anti-EGFR therapy was limited., Highlights • Metastasectomy for well-selected metastatic SBA patients was associated with improved OS. • Anti-PD1-based immunotherapy was active for dMMR SBA but not pMMR SBA. • Taxane-based chemotherapy demonstrated clinical activity in refractory SBA. • Anti-EGFR therapy demonstrated minimal activity in SBA.

Purpose Molecular diagnostic testing has become an integral part of the evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Expanded mutational testing, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), often identifies mutations with unclear clinical or prognostic implications. One such example is BRAF mutations that occur outside of codon 600 (non-V600 BRAF mutations). Methods We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study to characterize the clinical, pathologic, and survival implications of non-V600 BRAF mutations in metastatic CRC. We pooled patients in whom non-V600 BRAF mutations were identified from NGS databases at three large molecular genetics reference laboratories. Results A total of 9,643 patients with metastatic CRC underwent NGS testing. We identified 208 patients with non-V600 BRAF mutations, which occurred in 2.2% of all patients tested and accounted for 22% of all BRAF mutations identified. Cancers with non-V600 BRAF mutations, compared with cancers with V600E BRAF (V600E BRAF) mutations, were found in patients who were significantly younger (58 v 68 years, respectively), fewer female patients (46% v 65%, respectively), and patients who had fewer high-grade tumors (13% v 64%, respectively) or right-sided primary tumors (36% v 81%, respectively). Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients with non-V600 BRAF-mutant metastatic CRC compared with those with both V600E BRAF-mutant and wild-type BRAF metastatic CRC (60.7 v 11.4 v 43.0 months, respectively; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, non-V600 BRAF mutation was independently associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.18; P < .001). Conclusion Non-V600 BRAF mutations occur in approximately 2.2% of patients with metastatic CRC and define a clinically distinct subtype of CRC with an excellent prognosis.

To determine whether severity of lymphopenia is dependent on radiation dose and fractional volume of spleen irradiated unintentionally during definitive chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).177 patients with LAPC received induction chemotherapy (mainly gemcitabine-based regimens) followed by CRT (median 50.4 Gy with concurrent capecitabine) from January 2006 to December 2012. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was recorded at baseline, before CRT, and 2 to 10 weeks after CRT. Splenic dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were reported as mean splenic dose (MSD) and percentage of splenic volume receiving at least 5- (V5), 10- (V10), 15- (V15), and 20-Gy (V20) dose. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed with use of the Cox model, and development of post-CRT severe lymphopenia (ALC0.5 K/UL) was assessed by multivariate logistic regression with use of baseline and treatment factors.The median post-CRT ALC (0.68 K/UL; range, 0.13-2.72) was significantly lower than both baseline ALC (1.42 K/UL; range, 0.34-3.97; P.0001) and pre-CRT ALC (1.32 K/UL, range 0.36-4.82; P.0001). Post-CRT ALC0.5 K/UL was associated with inferior OS on univariate analysis (median, 11.1 vs 15.3 months; P=.01) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 1.66, P=.01). MSD (9.8 vs 6 Gy, P=.03), median V10 (32.6 vs 16%, P=.04), V15 (23.2 vs 9.5%, P=.03), and V20 (15.4 vs 4.6%, P=.02) were significantly higher in patients with severe lymphopenia than in those without. On multivariate analysis, postinduction lymphopenia (P.001; odds ratio [OR] = 5.25) and MSD (P=.002; OR= 3.42) were independent predictors for the development of severe post-CRT lymphopenia.Severe post-CRT lymphopenia is an independent predictor of poor OS in LAPC patients receiving CRT. Higher splenic doses increase the risk for the development of severe post-CRT lymphopenia. When clinically indicated, assessment of splenic DVHs before the acceptance of treatment plans may minimize the risk of severe post-CRT lymphopenia.

Considering that the course of the COVID-19 pandemic remains to be seen, this letter to the editor considers that longstanding structural changes that may be required in oncology institutions.

This letter to the editor reflects on the recently published article about management of cancer patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic by Al‐Shamsi et al., specifically as regards the management of febrile neutropenia in the context of the pandemic.

Purpose: Molecular profiling has been used to select patients for targeted therapy and determine prognosis. Noninvasive strategies are critical to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) given the challenge of obtaining liver tissue biopsies. Experimental Design: We analyzed blood samples from 206 patients with HCC using comprehensive genomic testing (Guardant Health) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Results: A total of 153/206 (74.3%) were men; median age, 62 years (range, 18–91 years). A total of 181/206 patients had ≥1 alteration. The total number of alterations was 680 (nonunique); median number of alterations/patient was three (range, 1–13); median mutant allele frequency (% cfDNA), 0.49% (range, 0.06%–55.03%). TP53 was the common altered gene [>120 alterations (non-unique)] followed by EGFR, MET, ARID1A, MYC, NF1, BRAF, and ERBB2 [20–38 alterations (nonunique)/gene]. Of the patients with alterations, 56.9% (103/181) had ≥1 actionable alterations, most commonly in MYC, EGFR, ERBB2, BRAF, CCNE1, MET, PIK3CA, ARID1A, CDK6, and KRAS. In these genes, amplifications occurred more frequently than mutations. Hepatitis B (HBV)-positive patients were more likely to have ERBB2 alterations, 35.7% (5/14) versus 8.8% HBV-negative (P = 0.04). Conclusions: This study represents the first large-scale analysis of blood-derived ctDNA in HCC in United States. The genomic distinction based on HCC risk factors and the high percentage of potentially actionable genomic alterations suggests potential clinical utility for this technology.

Importance Administration of gemcitabine-cisplatin, the current standard therapy for advanced biliary tract cancers, results in median progression-free survival and overall survival of 8.0 and 11.7 months, respectively. New treatments offering improved survival outcomes are therefore needed. Objective To evaluate the association between progression-free survival and the addition of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)–paclitaxel to gemcitabine-cisplatin for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial conducted at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and the Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona, enrolled 62 patients with advanced biliary tract cancers between April 14, 2015, and April 24, 2017. Interventions Patients initially received gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin, 25 mg/m2, and nab-paclitaxel, 125 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Owing to hematologic adverse events among the first 32 patients enrolled, these starting doses were reduced to 800, 25, and 100 mg/m2, respectively, for the remaining 28 patients. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary trial end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Results Of 60 patients who started treatment, the mean (SD) age was 58.4 (11.0) years, 38 (63%) had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 9 (15%) had extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 13 (22%) had gallbladder cancer, 47 (78%) had metastatic disease, and 13 (22%) had locally advanced disease. Median follow-up was 12.2 (95% CI, 9.4-19.4) months, and median progression-free survival was 11.8 (95% CI, 6.0 to 15.6) months. The partial response rate was 45%, and the disease control rate was 84%. Median overall survival was 19.2 months (95% CI, 13.2 months to not estimable). Patients in the safety population (n = 57) received a median of 6 (interquartile range, 3-11) cycles of treatment; 26 patients (46%) remained on their starting dose throughout the trial. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 58% of patients, and 9 patients (16%) withdrew owing to adverse events. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3 or higher adverse event, occurring in 19 patients (33%) overall. Post hoc analyses showed that treatment efficacy was not significantly associated with starting dose, tumor type, or disease status and that tolerability was improved with reduced- vs high-dose treatment. Conclusions and Relevance Treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin prolonged median progression-free survival and overall survival vs those reported for historical controls treated with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. These findings will be tested in a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02392637

Background Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a rare subtype of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to characterise the genomic alterations and outcomes of SRCC. Methods Medical records of metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients whose tumours were evaluated by NGS analysis were reviewed. SC-mCRC were classified into two groups: SRCC (>50% signet ring cells) and adenocarcinoma (AC) with SC component (≤50% signet ring cells). Results Six hundred and sixty-five mCRC patients were included. Of the 93 mCRC cases with SC features, 63 had slides for review. Of those 63 cases, 35 were confirmed SRCC, and 28 were AC with SC component. Compared with AC group, KRAS and PIK3CA mutations (mts) were found in only 11% (OR: 0.13) and 3% (OR: 0.15) of SRCC cases, respectively. In contrast to the 44% rate of APC mts in AC group, only 3% of SRCC patients had APC mts (OR = 0.04). Conclusions SRCC has distinct molecular features, including low rates of KRAS, PIK3CA and APC mts. Further study to identify activation pathways and potential therapeutic targets are needed.

Background: Liver reserve affects survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is used to predict overall survival (OS) and to prioritize HCC patients on the transplantation waiting list, but more accurate models are needed. We hypothesized that integrating insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels into MELD score (MELD-IGF-1) improves OS prediction as compared to MELD. Methods: We measured plasma IGF-1 levels in training (n = 310) and validation (n = 155) HCC cohorts and created MELD-IGF-1 score. Cox models were used to determine the association of MELD and MELD-IGF-1 with OS. Harrell’s c-index was used to compare the predictive capacity. Results: IGF-1 was significantly associated with OS in both cohorts. Patients with an IGF-1 level of ≤26 ng/mL in the training cohort and in the validation cohorts had significantly higher hazard ratios than patients with the same MELD but IGF-1 >26 ng/mL. In both cohorts, MELD-IGF-1 scores had higher c-indices (0.60 and 0.66) than MELD scores (0.58 and 0.60) (p < 0.001 in both cohorts). Overall, 26% of training and 52.9% of validation cohort patients were reclassified into different risk groups by MELD-IGF-1 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: After independent validation, the MELD-IGF-1 could be used to risk-stratify patients in clinical trials and for priority assignment for patients on liver transplantation waiting list.

Purpose: Family history of BRCA-related tumors may correlate with response to chemotherapy and overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer. The frequency of germline mutations has been reported in patients predominantly under the age of 60 or with strong family history. We examine the incidence of deleterious germline mutations and compare the chemotherapy responses and OS in an unselected group of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Experimental Design: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, who were seen at a single cancer center between 2010 and 2016, were included. Germline DNA was sequenced using a 263-gene panel to identify novel mutations (N = 133 MD Anderson cohort, N = 127 TCGA cohort). Chemotherapy response and OS were determined by review of medical records. Results: Deleterious germline mutations were identified in 26 of 133 patients (19.5%). Patients with DNA damage repair (DDR) gene mutations (ATM, BRCA1/2, CDKN2A, CHEK2, ERCC4, PALB2, n = 15) had an improved OS as compared with patients without (16.8 vs. 9.1 months, P = 0.03). Conversely, patients with other deleterious mutations had a trend toward worse OS. However, survival in the latter group was longer (P = NS) in those mutants initially treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. A family history of multiple breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers was associated with DDR gene mutations and better survival. Conclusions: We have identified novel germline mutations that are prognostic for survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. We observe improved survival in patients with DDR gene mutations and worsened survival in patients with deleterious mutations in non-DDR genes.