Search

PURPOSE Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, a rapidly progressing malignancy with a median survival time of 6 to 9 months, have previously responded poorly to chemotherapy. We conducted a phase III trial to determine whether treatment with pemetrexed and cisplatin results in survival time superior to that achieved with cisplatin alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS Chemotherapy-naive patients who were not eligible for curative surgery were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1. Both regimens were given intravenously every 21 days. RESULTS A total of 456 patients were assigned: 226 received pemetrexed and cisplatin, 222 received cisplatin alone, and eight never received therapy. Median survival time in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm was 12.1 months versus 9.3 months in the control arm ( P = .020, two-sided log-rank test). The hazard ratio for death of patients in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm versus those in the control arm was 0.77. Median time to progression was significantly longer in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm: 5.7 months versus 3.9 months ( P = .001). Response rates were 41.3% in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm versus 16.7% in the control arm ( P < .0001). After 117 patients had enrolled, folic acid and vitamin B12 were added to reduce toxicity, resulting in a significant reduction in toxicities in the pemetrexed/cisplatin arm. CONCLUSION Treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin and vitamin supplementation resulted in superior survival time, time to progression, and response rates compared with treatment with cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Addition of folic acid and vitamin B12 significantly reduced toxicity without adversely affecting survival time.

Purpose Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a disease of increasing incidence for which treatment options are limited. This study reports the clinical efficacy data for vinflunine, a novel microtubule inhibitor, in MPM. Patients and Methods Patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of MPM were eligible for enrollment onto this multicenter phase II trial if they had not received prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy and had measurable lesions by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. Vinflunine 320 mg/m2 by 10-minute intravenous infusion was administered on day 1 of 21-day cycles. Modifications of dose and schedule were made according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0. Efficacy was assessed by an external, independent radiologist. The one-sample multiple testing procedure of Fleming was applied at the predetermined recruitment stages of 20 and 40 assessable patients. Results Sixty-seven patients were enrolled. Five patients were not assessable for tumor response. The response rate was 13.8% (95% CI, 6.5% to 24.7%). The median survival was 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.8 to 12.0 months). The most common adverse events were anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, constipation, and nausea. Of grade 3 and 4 toxicities, neutropenia and constipation were the most common (45% and 9% of patients, respectively). Conclusion Vinflunine can be delivered with high-dose intensity in patients with MPM. The response rate and median survival are encouraging for a single agent. These data suggest that vinflunine should be further evaluated in the management of MPM.

Due to their rarity, only few trials have studied the role of the doxorubicin-streptozotocin (DS) combination in advanced well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine carcinomas (AWDPEC). However, the published results are inconsistent. We reviewed all AWDPEC (5-year period, 45 patients) treated in our institution with the DS combination for: objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, overall survival (OS) and toxicity. An ORR of 36% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 22-49) was obtained, with 16 partial responses (PR). The mean duration of PR was of 19.7 months. Two and 3-year OS rates were 50.2 and 24.4%, respectively. Toxicities were mainly digestive (grade > or =3 vomiting, 13%) and haematological (grade > or =3 neutropenia, 24%). Previous systemic chemotherapy and malignant hepatomegaly were associated with a poorer ORR (P=0.033, P=0.016) and OS (P=0.008, P=0.045). Multivariate analysis demonstrated previous chemotherapy as the only independent predictive-factor for survival (P=0.013). In conclusion, our data confirm the sensitivity of AWDPEC to the DS combination, with an ORR of 36% and a remarkable median response duration of 19.7 months, and suggests that it could be considered as a valid option in first-line therapy.

Purpose: The aim of this open-label phase II study was to evaluate the activity of raltitrexed (Tomudex; AstraZeneca, Cergy, France) and oxaliplatin combination therapy in patients with diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma. Patients and Methods: Fifteen pretreated and 55 chemotherapy-naive patients (median age, 60 years; World Health Organization performance status of ≤ 2) were enrolled. Most patients (66%) had advanced disease. Patients received raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 followed by oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Results: Twenty-four patients (34%) were classified as having a poor prognosis. In the overall study population, 14 patients (20%) had a partial response, and 32 patients (46%) had stable disease. The symptomatic response rates were as follows: shortness of breath, 36%; pain, 30%; activity, 23%; appetite, 21%; and asthenia, 20%. Median time to disease progression was 18 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 13 to 22 weeks). In chemotherapy-naive patients, median survival was 31 weeks (95% CI, 23 to 40 weeks) from the start of treatment and 49 weeks (95% CI, 40 to 52 weeks) from diagnosis of mesothelioma. In pretreated patients, median survival was 44 weeks (95% CI, 24 to 40 weeks) from the start of treatment and 226 weeks (95% CI, 63 to 292 weeks) from the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Overall 1-year survival was 26% (95% CI, 15.5% to 36.4%), survival was 22% (95% CI, 10.9% to 33.2%) in chemotherapy-naive patients and 40% (95% CI, 15.2% to 64.8%) in pretreated patients. Hematologic toxicity was mild, and there was no alopecia. The most common adverse events were asthenia, nausea/vomiting, and paraesthesia, and no treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusion: The raltitrexed and oxaliplatin combination is an active outpatient regimen in malignant mesothelioma and has an acceptable tolerability profile.

In the period 1989-1991, 612 patients with inoperable stage IIIA/B and IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomized in a phase III trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens. Survival data at five and six years of follow-up confirm the overall benefit of treatment with a combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin compared to vindesine plus cisplatin or vinorelbine alone. Of the 612 patients randomized at the start of the study, 17 have survived beyond five years. Of these patients, eight had entered the trial with metastatic disease. Multivariate analysis to detect prognostic factors suggested a possible interaction between the effect of having cisplatin in the chemotherapy received and baseline performance status. Subgroup analysis subsequently confirmed that the survival benefit of the vinorelbine plus chemotherapy regimen is evident only in patients with initial World Health Organization performance status (PS) of 0-1. Among these patients, the one-year survival rate is 38% for the vinorelbine/cisplatin arm, 29% for vindesine/cisplatin and 34% for vinorelbine alone. The corresponding figures for median survival are 43, 33 and 36 weeks. Among inoperable NSCLC patients with a PS of 2, who appear from this trial not to have benefited from the presence of cisplatin in their chemotherapy, use of single agent vinorelbine is an appropriate treatment option.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the dose at which at least 50% of the patients experienced a DLT during the first cycle, and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with only one prior chemotherapy treatment (without taxanes or topoisomerase I inhibitors) for advanced disease were included in the study. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion after premedication with corticosteroids followed immediately by irinotecan as a 90-minute IV infusion, every 3 weeks. No hematologic growth factors were allowed. RESULTS: Forty patients were entered through the following seven dose levels (docetaxel/irinotecan): 40/140 mg/m2, 50/175 mg/m2, 60/210 mg/m2, 60/250 mg/m2, 60/275 mg/m2, 60/300 mg/m2, and 70/250 mg/m2. Two hundred cycles were administered. Two MTDs were determined, 70/250 mg/m2 and 60/300 mg/m2; the DLTs were febrile neutropenia and diarrhea. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, with 85% of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities in patients included late diarrhea (7.5%), asthenia (15.0%), febrile neutropenia (22.5%), infection (7.5%), and nausea (5.0%). Pharmacokinetics of both docetaxel and irinotecan were not modified with the administration schedule of this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan is 60/275 mg/m2, respectively. At this dose level, the safety profile is manageable. The activity of this combination should be evaluated in phase II studies in different tumor types.

The aim of this study was to review the experience of the Institut Gustave Roussy in 163 patients with malignant mesothelioma over a 9-year period. Data from seven consecutive prospective trials, four of chemo-immunotherapy and three of chemotherapy were reviewed. The rationale, methods and results of these trials are summarised and discussed. 98 patients were included in four phase II trials of chemo-immunotherapy whose common denominator was a combination of cisplatin and alpha-interferon. The response rate ranged from 15% to 40%. High-dose weekly cisplatin combined with alpha-interferon yielded the highest response rate but the toxicity of this regimen was considered unacceptable. Neither higher doses of alpha-interferon or the addition of mitomycin C or interleukin-2 to the regimen were able to enhance the activity of this combination. 18 patients were included in a paclitaxel-cisplatin phase II trial. The response rate was only 6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0-24) and toxicity was also significant. This regimen was, therefore, considered ineffective. Of 17 patients with mesothelioma included in a phase I trial that combined raltitrexed and oxaliplatin, 6 (35%) obtained a partial response. Responses were seen even in cisplatin-refractory mesothelioma. Preliminary results of a subsequent ongoing phase II trial using raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) have confirmed this promising activity with a 30% (9/30) response rate (95% CI: 15-49). The tolerance of this outpatient regimen is acceptable (no significant haematological toxicity and no alopecia) and compares favourably with that of our previous regimens. The final results concerning response and survival are required to confirm the efficacy of this combination. The preliminary results of two studies suggest promising activity with the combination of raltitrexed-oxaliplatin in malignant mesothelioma. The efficacy/toxicity ratio of this combination compares favourably with that of our previous chemotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy regimens.

The activity of the combination of intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 administered every 3 weeks for 3 cycles then every 6 weeks was investigated in 51 chemotherapy naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The population was 92% male, with a median age of 54 years and median performance status of 1; 80% of patients had metastatic disease, including 37% with bone involvement. All patients received prophylactic premedication (ondansetron, dexamethasone plus cetirizine) and standard hyperhydration. With a median of 4 treatment cycles (range 1-9), 14 of 42 evaluable patients responded (overall response rate 33.3%, 95% CI 19.6-49.6%); the median response duration was 7.3 months, median survival 8.4 months, and 1-year survival rate 35%. The most common adverse event was neutropenia, occurring in two-thirds of patients. Neurosensory effects were cumulative but generally mild. No treatment-related deaths occurred. This combination of docetaxel/cisplatin showed activity in advanced NSCLC. While it was not clearly superior to single-agent docetaxel, due to differences in prognostic factors among the patients in open trials, a randomised study would be needed to demonstrate definitively whether cisplatin adds to the activity of docetaxel or not.

Circulating neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and chromogranin A (CgA) were measured in 128 patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET) to compare their sensitivity and specificity, to investigate factors associated with elevated serum levels and to determine the usefulness of these markers in the follow-up of NET patients. NSE (Cispack NSE, Cis Bio International, Gif-sur-Yvette, France; normal

Clinical trials investigating new trends in the treatment of stage I and II malignant mesothelioma have shown both intra-pleural immunotherapy and systemic chemo-immunotherapy to be efficacious. Intra-pleural gamma-interferon (γ-IFN) therapy was associated with tolerable toxicity and an overall response (ORR) rate of 19%, while treatment with intra-pleural recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) was more toxic, but yielded an ORR of 47% in phase I trial and 55% in a phase II study. The association of intravenous cisplatin and subcutaneous α-interferon (α-IFN) was also associated with an encouraging ORR of 40% and a median survival of 12 months. Treatment with cisplatin, α-IFN and mitomycin C was associated with moderate toxicity and an ORR of 21% and a median survival of 12 months. The association of cisplatin, α-IFN and IL-2 was, however, extremely toxic and resulted in an ORR of 15%. The majority of patients responding to intra-pleural immunotherapy and systemic chemo-immunotherapy had epithelial type mesothelioma. The most encouraging results obtained from trials investigating systemic chemotherapy were following treatment with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C and etoposide, where an ORR of 38% and an overall median survival rate of 16 months were achieved. Toxicity was mainly haematological and tolerable.

We report the results observed in a large randomized study comparing radiotherapy alone to combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy in unresectable squamous cell and large cell lung carcinoma. Radiation dose was 65 Gy in both groups and chemotherapy included vindesine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and lomustine. One hundred seventy-seven patients received radiotherapy alone, and 176 received the combined treatment. The 2-year survival rate was 14% for patients receiving radiotherapy vs. 21% for patients receiving the combined treatment (P = 0.02). The distant metastasis rate was significantly lower in the group receiving the combined treatment (P < 0.001). Local control at 1 year was poor in both groups (17% and 15%, respectively) and remains a major problem in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

This Phase II study evaluated the combination of two active agents in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC): carboplatin and ifosfamide. Thirty previously untreated patients (27 men and 3 women) with a median age of 59 years were included in this study. Twelve patients had one metastatic site and 18 had two or more metastatic sites. The median performance status was 80%. The chemotherapy (CT) regimen administered during the course of this study consisted of carboplatin (300 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (4 g/m2) plus mesna every 4 weeks. All 30 patients were evaluable: 1 achieved a complete remission (CR) and 18 achieved a partial remission (PR) (objective response rate, 63%). The median response time was 3 months and the median survival time was 8 months (range, 1 to 25+ months). Bone marrow toxicity was Grade III in three patients and Grade IV in four patients. The carboplatin and ifosfamide combination was well tolerated. No cross-resistance with the doxorubicin and etoposide regimen was established because 4 of 11 patients responded to this combination (+/- cisplatin) after failing to respond to the ifosfamide and carboplatin regimen. The ifosfamide and carboplatin combination may be considered for inclusion in non-cross-resistant alternating CT schedules.

We report the results observed in a large, randomized study that compared the effects of radiotherapy alone (the standard therapy) with those of a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in nonresectable squamous cell and large-cell lung carcinoma. The radiation dose was 65 Gy in each group, and chemotherapy included vindesine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and lomustine. In this study, 177 patients received radiotherapy alone (group A), and 176 patients received the combined treatment (group B). The 2-year survival rate was 14% in group A and 21% in group B (P = .08). The distant metastasis rate was significantly lower in group B (P less than .001). Local control was poor in both groups (17% and 15%, respectively) and remained the major problem.

One-hundred seventy-three patients with limited small cell lung cancer were included in three consecutive protocols alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The alternating schedule consisted of six courses of chemotherapy (doxorubicin, VP16213, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate in the first protocol; methotrexate being replaced by cisplatinum in the other two protocols) and three series of thoracic radiotherapy delivering a total dose of 45, 55, and 65 Gy in each consecutive protocol. Radiotherapy was started after the second course of chemotherapy. A 1-week gap was respected between each course of chemotherapy and each series of radiotherapy. Seventy percent of patients were in complete remission at the end of the induction treatment. The actuarial 5-year local control was 60% and the 5-year overall survival was 18%. Sixty percent of patients developed distant metastases. The death rate unrelated to cancer was 10%. These results show that alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy schedules are reproducible, and provide a consistent long-term local control and a long-term survival rate exceeding 15% in limited disease.

Management of advanced malignant mesothelioma (MM) still requires innovative systemic therapy as its prognosis is poorly affected by currently available chemotherapy. The combination cisplatin and alpha-interferon (alpha-INF) has synergistic antitumoral activity in preclinical models and interesting activity in phase I-II clinical trials. Weekly CDDP (60 mg/m2) and alpha-IFN (3 MUI/d: d1-d4) in combination was tested in a previous phase I-II study in 23 MM patients, with a 36% objective response rate (ORR). A trial with higher doses of alpha-IFN in the same combination schedule was conducted to explore an incrementalist hypothesis. Thirty patients with MM received the same CDDP dose (60 mg/m2/w) and doubled doses of alpha-IFN (6 MUI/d: d1-d4). The treatment protocol consisted of two cycles of 4 weeks on/4 weeks off followed by two shorter cycles of 3 weeks on/3 weeks off, in the absence of life-threatening toxicity or progressive disease. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. The main treatment-limiting side-effects were digestive intolerance (nausea, vomiting) and severe asthenia. Antitumoral efficacy was not increased (ORR = 27%). Haematological and neurological toxicities were moderate and manageable. The antitumoral activity of the CDDP-alpha-IFN combination with higher doses of the latter is similar to our previous experience, but tolerance issues make it a poorer choice for eventual comparative trials, or as a standard therapeutic indication.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin combination regimen, to explore its safety and pharmacokinetics, and to assess its antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients received the combination of raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin. Raltitrexed was administered as a 15-minute infusion followed by oxaliplatin as a 2-hour infusion 1 hour later, repeated every 3 weeks. Seven dose levels were explored, ranging from 2 to 3.75 mg/m2 and from 85 to 130 mg/m2 for raltitrexed and oxaliplatin, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of both raltitrexed and oxaliplatin was assessed at the last three dose levels. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were assessable for toxicity. Severe toxicities usually occurred from dose level V (raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2). This combination was not myelosuppressive, eliciting only sporadic grades 3 and 4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia without complications. There was no alopecia. DLTs were asthenia and nausea/vomiting, despite systematic antiemetic prophylaxis. Dose level VI (raltitrexed 3.5 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2) was deemed to be the MTD. Eight confirmed partial responses were observed: six patients with malignant mesothelioma (both pretreated and nonpretreated), one with fluorouracil-refractory pancreatic carcinoma, and one with renal carcinoma. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of both drugs did not suggest any drug interaction. CONCLUSION: The combination of raltitrexed and oxaliplatin given as consecutive short infusions every 3 weeks seems to be an acceptable regimen that allows a dose-intensity as high as the sum of the recommended doses of each agent given alone. The dose recommended for further phase II studies is raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Promising antitumor activity has been observed in patients with malignant mesothelioma.

Primary mediastinal seminoma is an uncommon neoplasm, the optimal management of which is still debated. Radiotherapy produces a 65% disease-free survival rate. We assess whether these results have been improved with the advent of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Data from 14 patients treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy were reviewed. 9 had received cisplatin-based chemotherapy (Group 1): their outcome was compared with that of 5 patients treated with radiotherapy without chemotherapy (Group 2). We also reviewed data from the English literature using strict criteria, and report results concerning patients who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy and those who received radiotherapy. 8 of the 9 patients (89%) in Group 1 are long-term disease-free survivors and only 3 of 5 patients in Group 2. The patient who died in Group 1 was the only one who refused surgical resection of residual masses after chemotherapy. The review of the literature revealed that 59 of 68 (87%) patients initially managed with cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy and for whom sufficient data are available, are long-term survivors and free of disease. Some of these patients had also received radiotherapy. Only 64 of 103 (62%) treated with thoracic radiotherapy without chemotherapy were long-term disease-free survivors. The disease-free survival rate of 51 patients who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy (excluding those who received carboplatin) was 86%. The difference in survival between patients administered cisplatin-based chemotherapy and those who underwent radiotherapy is apparently not due to unbalanced prognostic factors, the effect of time or non-specific medical management. We conclude that cisplatin-based chemotherapy allows long-term disease-free survival in approximately 85% of patients. These results seem to be higher than those obtained without cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, a randomised study is required for definitive conclusions, but it is very unlikely that such a study will be performed due to the rarity of this neoplasm. Another alternative would be a meta-analysis based on individual data.

PURPOSE Primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) are uncommon neoplasms and clinically and biologically distinct from other germ cell tumors (GCT). We describe the clinical and biologic features of these patients and evaluate the results of treatment during the cisplatin era. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1976 and 1993, 38 patients with mediastinal NSGCT received cisplatin-based chemotherapy as part of their primary treatment. Twenty-nine of them were initially treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy (IGR), VillejuiF, France, and nine were referred for salvage treatment. RESULTS Of the 29 patients initially treated at IGR, 11 (39%) had metastasis. A complete response (CR) to therapy was obtained in 19 of 29 patients (66%) after chemotherapy and surgery. Ten patients (34.5%) have remained free of disease with a median follow-up of 89 months. All patients who did not achieve a CR died of disease. The 2-year overall survival rate for the IGR patients is 45% and the 2-year disease-free survival is 37%. Only the presence of extrapulmonary metastasis was of prognostic significance in the univariate analysis (P = .0095). None of the 20 patients who required salvage therapy is currently disease-free. Five patients developed and subsequently died of a hematologic malignancy at an interval range of 1 to 47 months from treatment of mediastinal NSGCT. Cytogenetic analysis of leukemic cells found an isochromosome of the short arm of chromosome 12 (12p) in two cases. The incidence of leukemia was 21% in patients who attained a CR. CONCLUSION Primary mediastinal NSGCT is a clinical and biologic entity that should be distinguished from other GCT. About 40% of these patients can envisage long-term survival with modern therapy that includes cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgical resection of residual masses. New strategies are required for patients who do not attain a CR. Predictive factors and improvement in therapy are required for mediastinal NSGCT-associated leukemia.

PURPOSE To identify prognostic factors of improved survival after resection of isolated pulmonary metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of the records of all patients with PM from colorectal cancer who underwent thoracic surgery with curative intent before December 1992 at a single surgical center was performed. Univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox's model) analyses of survival were used to identify significant prognostic factors. RESULTS Eighty-six patients with PM from colon (n = 49) or rectal (n = 37) cancer underwent 102 thoracic operations, which included 21 bilateral and 10 incomplete resections. The 5- and 10-year probabilities of survival (Kaplan-Meier) after the first thoracic operation were 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15% to 35%) and 20% (95% CI, 13% to 31%), respectively. Sex, age, site of the primary tumor (colon or rectum), disease-free interval (DFI), and previous resection of hepatic metastases were found not to be statistically significant prognostic factors. Complete resection, a limited number ( < two) of PM, and a normal prethoracotomy serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level were predictors of a longer survival duration by univariate analysis, but only complete resection (P = .024) and preoperative CEA level (P = .001) were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. The estimated 5-year survival rate of patients with a normal prethoracotomy CEA level was 60%, as compared with 4% in cases with elevated ( > 5 ng/mL) CEA level. CONCLUSION Besides resectability, the prethoracotomy serum CEA level appears the most reliable predictor of survival in patients with isolated PM from colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE To assess the tolerance, toxicity, and antitumoral activity of the weekly combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and interferon alfa-2a (IFNalpha2a) in advanced diffuse malignant mesothelioma (DMM). PATENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with DMM (23 pleural and three peritoneal), previously untreated, were enrolled onto this study between August 1991 and December 1992. All patients had measurable disease defined by computed tomographic (CT) scan and diagnostic confirmation by histopathology review panel. IFNalpha2a (3 x 10(6) IU subcutaneously on days 1 to 4) and CDDP (60 mg/m2/wk on day 2) were given weekly. Initially planned as a 5-weeks-on/3-weeks-off treatment cycle, poor patient tolerance observed in the first 12 patients treated (group A) led to schedule adaptation with a shorter treatment sequence and prolongation of the rest period (4 weeks on/4 weeks off) in the following 14 patients (group B). At least two cycles were administered to each patient in the absence of tumor progression. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were assessable for toxicity and 25 for efficacy (World Health Organization [WHO] criteria). Sixty-eight cycles of IFN/CDDP were given, with a median of three cycles per patient (range, one to five). Toxicity was mainly clinical, with progressive anorexia, asthenia, and prolonged nausea/emesis; these side effects have limited treatment acceptance in many patients. Thrombocytopenia and leukopenia were rarely noted as treatment-limiting toxicities. Objective responses (all partial) were obtained in 10 patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 20% to 60%). The median response duration was 11 months (range, 6 to 18). The median time to progression (TTP) for the whole cohort was 6 months and the median survival time was 12 months (range, 5 to 32). Objective responders had a significantly longer median TTP (21 months) and survival time (25 months) than nonresponders (3 and 8 months, respectively). CONCLUSION The results of this pilot phase I-II study show encouraging antitumor activity in this traditionally resistant tumor, even if the specific contribution of IFN remains speculative and needs further clinical research. Our ongoing program is exploring the dose-intensity impact of IFN dose within the same combination.

32 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously untreated by chemotherapy were included in a phase I–II study in order to determine the feasibility of the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin, each administered at its optimal dose, i.e. 30 mg/m 2 weekly and 120 mg/m 2 every 4–6 weeks, respectively. There were 27 males and 5 females with a mean age of 55 years and a median performance status of 80%. 13 had locally advanced disease and 19 had distant metastases at the time of inclusion. Our study demonstrated the feasibility of this protocol. Dose intensities could be maximised by adapting vinorelbine doses rather than by postponing treatment in the event of neutropenia. Both response rate (33%) and overall survival of the population (median 11 months) justify further studies.

Vindesine (VDS) and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) administered by continuous infusion have shown an increased therapeutic index in many solid malignancies. On the basis of our encouraging results obtained by the association of Cisplatin (CDDP, bolus) and VDS with 5-FU by continuous infusion, in unresectable non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [1], we tested VDS and 5-FU by continuous infusion in combination with CDDP and high doses of leucovorinin in order to enhance the anti tumoral effect of 5-FU [2].

7196 Background: CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor which takes part in diverse events like the migration of lymphocytes to sites of inflammation, internalization of the HIV particle by lymphocytes, and homing of metastasizing tumor cells. Recent studies suggest that nuclear -rather than membranous or cytoplasmic- expression of CXCR4 may signify a different function. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of nuclear CXCR4 expression in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Methods: The records of 66 MPM patients were reviewed and CXCR4 expression of their tumors were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Prognostic significance of this marker was evaluated using Log rank test and a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The mean age of patients was 61±10 years (min: 41, max: 85). Fifty-one patients were males (77%), and 15 were females (23%). The median percentage of cells expressing nuclear CXCR4 was 5.1% (min-max: 0–95), and this was used as the cut-off to define CXCR4-po...

7215 Background: Patients with limited SCLC have a 5-year overall survival of 25% despite aggressive initial treatment. In order to reserve toxic therapeutics to patients who may benefit from it we searched for prognostic factors in large series of localized SCLC treated at a single institution. Methods: Between 1981/10/12 and 2000/11/27, 186 patients with limited SCLC were included in six consecutive prospective trials in our institution. They received polychemotherapy by cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and etoposide with alternated radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 11.26 yrs (reverse Kaplan-Meier). Log-rank test and Cox's proportional-hazards models were used to evaluate the value of prognostic factors and the corresponding hazard ratio (HR) computed. Results: Variables tested in the univariate analysis were : gender (male), age (> 60 yrs), initial Karnofsky ( 40 PY), initial haemoglobin count (

SO-CALLED “STATE-OF-ART chemotherapy” in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is based on cisplatin (CDDP) and vinca alkakoids, such as vindesine (VDS) or vinblastine (VLB), or more recently, vinorelbine (VRL) [I, 21. On the basis of our recent experience with VDS continuous infusion (CI) and CDDP in metastatic small cell carcinoma of the head and neck [3, 41, we decided to explore the feasibility, tolerability and activity of CDDP plus CI VDS and 5-fluorouracil (S-FU) (FVP regimen) in NSCLC. A retrospective (historical) comparison has been done with the results obtained by our own group in a previous trial with the reference MVP (rnitomycin C, VLB and CDDP) regimen [5-8 1. From February 1989 to November 1989, 53 consecutive previously untreated patients bearing measurable or evaluable NSCLC were entered into the trial. Patients’ characteristics, stage and sites of metastasis are listed in Table 1. FVP regimen: 5-FU 800 mg/m* by 24-h CI, on days 1 to 4; VDS 0.8 mg/m2 by 24-h CI on days 1 to 4; CDDP 100 mg/m2 on day 1 with hydration and mannitol-induced diuresis. Both 5-FU and VDS were diluted in 1000 ml of isotonic solution and administered by a catheter placed in the subclavian vein. Cycles were repeatedevery 3 weeks. VDS and 5-FUdoses wereadjusted according to white blood cell (WBC) counts on days lo,14 and 20 after the previous cycle, with 20% reduction for grade IV myelotoxicity on days 10 and 14, and 50% reduction in cases of neutropenic fever.

Endobronchial high dose rate brachytherapy (BT) is an alternative treatment for very small and limited bronchial carcinomas in patients with chronic respiratory deficiency after past history of lung cancer treated by surgery and/or external radiotherapy. Study of toxicity and results of high dose rate B.T. in 18 patients with 21 limited and endoscopically visible lesions. Patients Medium age: 65—Sex Ratio: 16 M/2 F—OMS: 2. Localization of tumors: main bronchus = 9, lobar and segmental bronchus = 12. No adenopathy on CT-scan. No other therapy possible because of respiratory deficiency. The treatment was 6 sessions of 5 Gy with a 7-day interval with one or two catheter applicators. A CT-scan with catheter was perforated to have a better visualization ofthe tumor and to assess the relation between the tumor, the normal structures and the applicator. In 12 treatments, the dose prescription point was at With a mean follow-up of 9 months, toxicity on bronchus was nil; 18 tumors were locally controlled, 3 failures were observed and 1 peribronchial recurrence suspected. The 3 treatment failures were in relation with a wrong evaluation of the distance between the tumor and the applicator.

Sixty-three evaluable patients with limited small cell lung carcinoma were entered into two pilot studies alternating 6 cycles of combination chemotherapy (Doxorubicin 40 mg/m 2 d 1; VP16213 75 mg/m 2 d 1, 2, 3; Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 d 3, 4, 5, 6; and Methotrexate 400 mg/m 2 d 2—plus folinic acid rescue—or Cis-Platinum 100 mg/m 2 d 2) with 3 courses of mediastinal radiotherapy as induction treatment. The first course of radiotherapy started 10 days after the second cycle of chemotherapy; there was a 7 day rest between chemotherapy and radiotherapy courses. This 6 month induction treatment was followed by a maintenance chemotherapy. The total mediastinal radiation dose was increased from 4500 rad in the first study to 5500 rad in the second. Both protocols obtained a complete response (CR) rate of greater than 85% (with fiberoptic bronchoscopy and histological verification). Local control at 2 years was 61% in the first study and 82% in the second. Relapse-free survival at 2 years was 32 and 37%, respectively. Toxicity was acceptable. We conclude that our results justify further clinical research in alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy schedules.

Purpose : Local failure is a major problem in locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. The main objective of this Phase II trial was to test the feasibility of a combined concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy approach in an attempt to improve local control. Methods and Materials : From December 1989 to December 1992, 34 patients were included. The treatment schedule consisted of hyperfractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy in 48 fractions and 6 weeks with two daily sessions of 1.25 Gy), cisplatin (6 mg/m2 every day of radiotherapy), and vindesine (2.5 mg/m2 once weekly). After a 3-week rest period, two full cycles of cisplatin (120 mg/m2 on weeks 10 and 14) and vindesine (2.5 mg/m2 on weeks 11, 12, and 13) were given. Treatment evaluation with thoracic computed scan, bronchoscopy, and bronchial biopsies was performed 3 months after completion of radiation therapy. Failure rates were estimated using a competing risk approach. Results : The complete response rate was 50%. Local failure rates at 1 and 3 years were 53 and 56%, respectively. Distant metastases rates at 1 and 3 years were 26.5 and 29%. Overall survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were respectively 53, 33, and 12%. Severe esophagitis was observed in three patients (9%). Lethal toxicity was observed in two patients. Conclusion : This Phase II trial confirms the feasibility of this type of approach with specific dose reduction and suggests that it may improve local control compared to conventional approaches.