Search

Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Assess the rationale behind using i.p. chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer patients and critically evauate the data supporting its use.Interpret the argument that i.p. chemotherapy cannot be accepted as standard of care for first-line systemic treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma.Determine which epithelial ovarian cancer patients may be appropriate for i.p. chemotherapy.Avoid and/or manage the toxicities observed with i.p. chemotherapy. CME Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ at CME.TheOncologist.com The CME activity for this article consists of material from both “Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Women with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer” (Trimble et al.) and “Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer: The Con View” (Vergote et al.). In 2006, i.p. chemotherapy re-emerged as a controversial topic in debates about the optimal treatment for women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. In this paper, we address the rationale behind i.p. chemotherapy, the data supporting its use, the selection of appropriate patients for i.p. chemotherapy, how best to avoid and manage the toxicities observed with i.p. chemotherapy, and directions for future research.

Anticancer cytotoxic agents go through a process by which their antitumor activity-on the basis of the amount of tumor shrinkage they could generate-has been investigated. In the late 1970s, the International Union Against Cancer and the World Health Organization introduced specific criteria for the codification of tumor response evaluation. In 1994, several organizations involved in clinical research combined forces to tackle the review of these criteria on the basis of the experience and knowledge acquired since then. After several years of intensive discussions, a new set of guidelines is ready that will supersede the former criteria. In parallel to this initiative, one of the participating groups developed a model by which response rates could be derived from unidimensional measurement of tumor lesions instead of the usual bidimensional approach. This new concept has been largely validated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group and integrated into the present guidelines. This special article also provides some philosophic background to clarify the various purposes of response evaluation. It proposes a model by which a combined assessment of all existing lesions, characterized by target lesions (to be measured) and nontarget lesions, is used to extrapolate an overall response to treatment. Methods of assessing tumor lesions are better codified, briefly within the guidelines and in more detail in Appendix I. All other aspects of response evaluation have been discussed, reviewed, and amended whenever appropriate.

PURPOSE: We chose to examine the impact of socioeconomic factors on accrual to National Cancer Institute (NCI)–sponsored cancer treatment trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We estimated the geographic and demographic cancer burden in the United States and then identified 24,332 patients accrued to NCI-sponsored cancer treatment trials during a 12-month period. Next, we examined accrual by age, sex, geographic residence, health insurance status, health maintenance organization market penetration, several proxy measures of socioeconomic status, the availability of an oncologist, and the presence of a hospital with an approved multidisciplinary cancer program. RESULTS: Pediatric patients were accrued to clinical trials at high levels, whereas after adolescence, only a small percentage of cancer patients were enrolled onto clinical trials. There were few differences by sex. Black males as well as Asian-American and Hispanic adults were accrued to clinical trials at lower rates than white cancer patients of the same age. Overall, the highest observed accrual was in suburban counties. Compared with the United States population, patients enrolled onto clinical trials were significantly less likely to be uninsured and more like to have Medicare health insurance. Geographic areas with higher socioeconomic levels had higher levels of clinical trial accruals. The number of oncologists and the presence of approved cancer programs both were significantly associated with increased accrual to clinical trials. CONCLUSION: We must work to increase the number of adults who enroll onto trials, especially among the elderly. Ongoing partnership with professional societies may be an effective approach to strengthen accrual to clinical trials.

ABSTRACT: Preclinical data suggest that some new anticancer agents directed at novel targets demonstrate tumor growth inhibition but not tumor shrinkage. Such cytostatic agents may offer clinical benefits for patients in the absence of tumor shrinkage. In addition, lower doses of some of these agents may be just as effective as higher doses, implying that toxicity may not be an ideal end point for dose finding. Because of these factors, the sequence and design of traditional phase I, II, and III trials used for cytotoxic agents (which typically shrink tumors and in a dose-dependent manner) may not be appropriate for cytostatic agents. This article discusses options for modifying trial designs to accommodate cytostatic agents. Examples are given where these options have been tried or are currently being tried. Recommendations given for choosing among the trial designs depend on what is known preclinically about the agents (eg, does one have a validated and reproducible biologic end point that can be used to guide a dose escalation?), what is known about the patient population being studied (eg, does one have a well-documented historical progression-free survival rate at 1 year for comparison with the experience of the new agent?), and the numbers of agents and patients available for participation in trials. Planned and ongoing trials will test the utility of some of these new approaches.

Cisplatin was discovered to have cytotoxic properties in the 1960s, and by the end of the 1970s it had earned a place as the key ingredient in the systemic treatment of germ cell cancers. Since the early seminal work in the preclinical and clinical development of this drug, several thousand analogues have been synthesised and tested for properties that would enhance the therapeutic index of cisplatin. About 13 of these analogues have been evaluated in clinical trials, but only one (carboplatin) has provided definite advantage over cisplatin and achieved worldwide approval. However, carboplatin has afforded benefit only in reducing some cisplatin toxicities; it has not enlarged the spectrum of platinum-sensitive cancers, nor has it proved active in cisplatin-resistant cancers. The major obstacle to the efficacy of cisplatin or carboplatin is platinum resistance, either innate or acquired. The mechanisms of this resistance have been under intense study, and many of the cisplatin analogues synthesised in the past decade have been designed specifically with the hope of overcoming platinum resistance. The mechanism of the cytotoxic activity of platinum complexes has also been studied intensely. Recently synthesised analogues have been designed to interact with DNA in a manner different from cisplatin and carboplatin, with the desire of finding new structures with a superior or wider spectrum of antitumor efficacy. Most recently, water soluble platinum complexes that retain antitumour activity, but that can be effectively absorbed after oral administration, have been synthesised with the goal of improving patient quality of life. Nine platinum analogues are currently in clinical trials around the world (ormaplatin [tetraplatin], oxaliplatin, DWA2114R, enloplatin, lobaplatin, CI-973 [NK-121], 254-S, JM-216 and liposome-entrapped cis-bis-neodecanoato-trans-R,R-1,2-diaminocyclohexane platinum (II) [LNDDP]). Some of these analogues only represent attempts to reduce cisplatin toxicity and/or allow administration without forced hydration and diuresis, which carboplatin already does. Others are 'third generation' complexes shown to have limited or no cross-resistance with cisplatin in preclinical studies. They are being tested clinically with particular attention to this highly desirable property.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Forty-eight patients with recurrent adenocarcinoma of the ovary were treated with taxol and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), with a target taxol dose intensity of 250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (83.3 mg/m2/week). We have assessed the patterns of granulocyte and platelet toxicity seen in this cohort. Individual patients received up to nine cycles of therapy. Criteria for entry onto protocol included good end organ function, good performance status and the absence of substantial co-morbid disease. Mean taxol dose intensity was 79.0 mg/m2/week for the whole cohort and did not diminish with increased duration of therapy. Granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were well controlled, with the average duration of platelet and neutropenic nadirs being less than 1 day for all cycles. There was no evidence of cumulative toxicity for granulocytes nor platelets, for up to eight cycles of therapy. We conclude that taxol, when given with G-CSF support, can be safely administered in a dose-intense fashion for multiple cycles of therapy, without cumulative bone marrow toxicity.

The large number of negative phase III trials in oncology over the last several years has renewed interest in refining phase II oncology clinical trials to maximize the chances of success in phase III testing. More efficient phase II study designs will improve our ability to identify promising agents for testing while accurately identifying nonefficacious agents. Recognizing that new paradigms of phase II trial designs need to be developed, the Clinical Trial Design Task Force of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Investigational Drug Steering Committee has tackled the question of improving efficiency of phase II clinical trials. In this issue of CCR Focus, four of the major topics discussed are presented. First, the task force recommended that alternate phase II end points should be studied. Second, depending on the characteristics of the specific trial and study population, historical controls or a randomized design may be more appropriate. Third, rational incorporation of biomarkers into phase II trials should be encouraged. Last, novel imaging modalities will be critical in evaluating the clinical benefit of new cytostatic agents.

An analysis of the activity of compounds tested in pre-clinical in vivo and in vitro assays by the National Cancer Institute's Developmental Therapeutics Program was performed. For 39 agents with both xenograft data and Phase II clinical trials results available, in vivo activity in a particular histology in a tumour model did not closely correlate with activity in the same human cancer histology, casting doubt on the correspondence of the pre-clinical models to clinical results. However, for compounds with in vivo activity in at least one-third of tested xenograft models, there was correlation with ultimate activity in at least some Phase II trials. Thus, an efficient means of predicting activity in vivo models remains desirable for compounds with anti-proliferative activity in vitro. For 564 compounds tested in the hollow fibre assay which were also tested against in vivo tumour models, the likelihood of finding xenograft activity in at least one-third of the in vivo models tested rose with increasing intraperitoneal hollow fibre activity, from 8% for all compounds tested to 20% in agents with evidence of response in more than 6 intraperitoneal fibres (P< 0.0001). Intraperitoneal hollow fibre activity was also found to be a better predictor of xenograft activity than either subcutaneous hollow fibre activity or intraperitoneal plus subcutaneous activity combined. Since hollow fibre activity was a useful indicator of potential in vivo response, correlates with hollow fibre activity were examined for 2304 compounds tested in both the NCI 60 cell line in vitro cancer drug screen and hollow fibre assay. A positive correlation was found for histologic selectivity between in vitro and hollow fibre responses. The most striking correlation was between potency in the 60 cell line screen and hollow fibre activity; 56% of compounds with mean 50% growth inhibition below 10–7.5 M were active in more than 6 intraperitoneal fibres whereas only 4% of compounds with a potency of 10–4 M achieved the same level of hollow fibre activity (P< 0.0001). Structural parameters of the drugs analysed included compound molecular weight and hydrogen-bonding factors, both of which were found to be predictive of hollow fibre activity. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign www.bjcancer.com

In this issue of Clinical Cancer Research , Townsley et al. report the toxicities they observed in 401 patients enrolled on 19 phase I and II trials of targeted therapeutic agents as part of the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) early therapeutics development program ([1][1]). They compared

Background: Many cancer patients in phase I clinical trials are treated at doses of chemotherapeutic agents that are below the biologically active level, thus reducing their chances for therapeutic benefit. Current phase I trials often take a long time to complete and provide little information about interpatient variability or cumulative toxicity. Purpose: Our objective was to develop alternative designs for phase I trials so that fewer patients are treated at subtherapeutic dose levels, trials are of reduced duration, and important information (i.e., cumulative toxicity and maximum tolerated dose) needed to plan phase II trials is obtained. Methods: We fit a stochastic model to data from 20 phase I trials involving the study of nine different drugs. We then simulated new data from the model with the parameters estimated from the actual trials and evaluated the performance of alternative phase I designs on this simulated data. Four designs were evaluated. Design 1 was a conventional design (similar to the commonly used modified Fibonacci method) using cohorts of three to six patients, with 40% dose-step increments and no intrapatient dose escalation. Designs 2 through 4 included only one patient per cohort until one patient experienced dose-limiting toxic effects or two patients experienced grade 2 toxic effects (during their first course of treatment for designs 2 and 3 or during any course of treatment for design 4). Designs 3 and 4 used 100% dose steps during this initial accelerated phase. After the initial accelerated phase, designs 2 through 4 resorted to standard cohorts of three to six patients, with 40% dose-step increments. Designs 2 through 4 used intrapatient dose escalation if the worst toxicity is grade 0-1 in the previous course for that patient. Results: Only three of the actual trials demonstrated cumulative toxic effects of the chemotherapeutic agents in patients. The average number of patients required for a phase I trial was reduced from 39.9 for design 1 to 24.4, 20.7, and 21.2 for designs 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The average number of patients who would be expected to have grade 0-1 toxicity as their worst toxicity over three cycles of treatment is 23.3 for design 1, but only 7.9, 3.9, and 4.8 for designs 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The average number of patients with grade 3 toxicity as their worst toxicity increases from 5.5 for design 1 to 6.2, 6.8, and 6.2 for designs 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The average number of patients with grade 4 toxicity as their worst toxicity increases from 1.9 for design 1 to 3.0, 4.3, and 3.2 for designs 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Conclusion: Accelerated titration (i.e., rapid intrapatient drug dose escalation) designs appear to effectively reduce the number of patients who are undertreated, speed the completion of phase I trials, and provide a substantial increase in the information obtained. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1138-47]

Tetrachloro(d,l-trans)1,2-diaminocyclohexaneplatinum (IV), ormaplatin (OP), NSC 363812, formerly called tetraplatin, is a second generation platinum (IV) compound which has been evaluated in clinical trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in collaboration with Upjohn. Interest in this group of compounds was stimulated by structure-activity studies by Burchenal et al.,(1) which suggested that platinum compounds containing the 1,2-diaminocyclohexane (DACH) carrier ligand retained activity in vitro and in vivo against L1210 and P388 murine leukemia cell lines with acquired resistance to cisplatin. In addition, in preclinical antitumor testing, OP demonstrated broad spectrum activity comparable to or superior to cisplatin (CDDP) against a variety of murine and human tumor models (2,3) however, its activity in other models was variable and against a screening panel of 16 human ovarian cancer cell lines was disappointing (4).

PURPOSE To provide paclitaxel, an investigational drug at the inception of this study, to women with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic breast cancer and to evaluate response and toxicity in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred sixty-seven patients with progressive disease (PD) following at least two chemotherapy regimens for metastatic breast cancer and a contraindication to further doxorubicin treatment received paclitaxel either at 175 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) over 24 hours or at 135 mg/m2 if they had prior irradiation to 30% of marrow-bearing bone or a cumulative dose of mitomycin > or = 20 mg/m2. RESULTS In a subgroup of patients (n = 172) with measurable disease, four complete responses (CRs) and 36 partial responses (PRs) occurred, for an overall response rate of 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17% to 30%). No differences in response rates were noted according either to the number of prior chemotherapy regimens received or to whether patients were considered refractory to doxorubicin. The dose and schedule used in this trial resulted in febrile neutropenia in 45% of patients and a hospitalization rate of 49%. CONCLUSION Paclitaxel's activity in this multiinstitutional trial in heavily pretreated patients confirms the encouraging results attained in single-institution trials. Although at this dose and schedule paclitaxel may be considered too myelosuppressive for palliative care, supportive measures such as colony-stimulating factors and antibiotics were not used prophylactically. Current research efforts are focusing on whether paclitaxel's activity against breast cancer is dose- and/or schedule-dependent, and on what role it has in patients with less advanced disease.

PURPOSE To provide an investigational drug, paclitaxel, now commercially available, to women with refractory ovarian cancer and to evaluate response and toxicity in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 3, at least three prior chemotherapy regimens, adequate hepatic and renal function, and no significant cardiac history were eligible. Patients were treated with paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 administered by 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. RESULTS Leukopenia was the most frequent toxicity, with 78% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Other grade 3 and 4 toxicities were less common: fever (33%), infection (12%), thrombocytopenia (8%), vomiting (7%), cardiac (2%), neurologic (2%), and mucositis (1%). Fifteen treatment-related deaths (1.5%) were reported. The objective response rate was 22% (4% complete response [CR], 18% partial response; 95% confidence interval [CI] for overall response, 19% to 25%). The median time to progression from treatment initiation was 7.1 months in responding patients and 4.5 months for all patients. The median survival duration was 8.8 months. CONCLUSION Paclitaxel has shown activity in women with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer, and it can be administered with an acceptable safety profile. Further research is needed to determine the optimal role of paclitaxel in the primary and salvage treatment of ovarian cancer.

The clinical development of taxol, a new antimicrotubule agent with a unique mechanism of cytotoxic action, has proceeded slowly due to serious hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) and shortages in its supply. Nevertheless, large-scale phase II trials have been initiated as taxol has recently demonstrated impressive activity in advanced and cisplatin-refractory ovarian carcinoma. Furthermore, the incidence of HSRs has been reduced substantially with premedications and modifications in the administration schedule. However, various manifestations of potential cardiotoxicity have been observed in several patients who participated in four phase I and II studies of taxol. Asymptomatic bradycardia has occurred in a high proportion of patients, including 29% of ovarian cancer patients who were treated with maximally tolerated doses of taxol in a phase II study. More profound cardiac disturbances, including a range of atrioventricular conduction blocks, left bundle branch block, ventricular tachycardia (VT), and manifestations of cardiac ischemia, have been observed in seven of 140 patients (5%) who received taxol. Descriptions of these events are presented in this report to alert investigators to the potential for these adverse effects. Although these disturbances did not result in serious sequelae in most patients, investigators should continue to maintain a high degree of caution until precise risk factors, frequency, and clinical significance of these adverse cardiac effects are determined.

Thrombotic microangiopathic hemolytic anemia has been associated with several chemotherapeutic agents. The authors describe a patient who developed this syndrome while receiving carboplatin, an analog of cisplatin. The clinical course was marked by encephalopathy and multifocal neurologic deficits. Progressive brainstem dysfunction culminated in coma and respiratory arrest. Pathologic examination revealed widespread microvascular thrombosis, particularly severe in the heart, kidney, and brain. Although the pathogenesis of chemotherapy-related thrombotic microangiopathy remains unclear, an elevated von Willebrand factor antigen and pathologic evidence of endothelial hyperplasia in this patient suggest that an abnormality of the endothelium is related to the development of the clinical syndrome.

4-Ipomeanol (IPO) is the first agent to undergo preclinical development at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) based principally on a specific biochemical-biological rationale for clinical investigation as an antineoplastic agent targeted against lung cancer. This disease-specific development of IPO was initially stimulated by observations that the compound was activated by metabolism, preferentially within the mammalian lung, specifically within bronchiolar Clara cells, and that its predominant toxicity was to the lung in most species. IPO is inactive or only minimally active against most conventional antitumor test systems. However, some human lung cancer cell lines, as well as a variety of fresh human lung tumor biopsy specimens, have been shown to be capable of mediating the in situ biotransformation of IPO to a potentially cytotoxic intermediate. In this report, the biochemistry, metabolism, preclinical pharmacology, and toxicology of IPO are reviewed and the clinical development plans for this unique and challenging new agent are presented.

Background: Tumor shrinkage is a common end point used in screening new cytotoxic agents. The standard World Health Organization criterion for partial response is a 50% or more decrease in the sum of the products of two measurements (the maximum diameter of a tumor and the largest diameter perpendicular to this maximum diameter) of individual tumors. However, theoretically, the simple sum of the maximum diameters of individual tumors is more linearly related to cell kill than is the sum of the bidimensional products. It has been hypothesized that the calculation of bidimensional products is unnecessary, and a 30% decrease in the sum of maximum diameters of individual tumors (assuming spherical shape and equivalence to a 50% reduction in the sum of the bidimensional products) was proposed as a new criterion. We have applied the standard response and the new response criteria to the same data to determine whether the same number of responses in the same patients would result. Methods: Data from 569 patients included in eight studies of a variety of cancers were reanalyzed. The two response criteria were separately applied, and the results were compared using the k statistic. The importance of confirmatory measurements and the frequency of nonspherical tumors were also examined. In addition, for a subset of 128 patients, a unidimensional criterion for disease progression (30% increase in the sum of maximum diameters) was applied and compared with the standard definition of a 25% increase in the sum of the bidimensional products. Results: Agreement between the unidimensional and bidimensional criteria was generally found to be good. The k statistic for concordance for overall response was 0.95. Conclusion: We conclude that one dimensional measurement of tumor maximum diameter may be sufficient to assess change in solid tumors. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91:523‐8]