Search

e14529 Background: PD-L1 is the only biomarker that has been accepted to identify patients who could potentially benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) administration, but also PD-L1 negative tumors respond to immunotherapy. However, other biomarkers have been proposed but they are too expensive and actually, there is not a consensus for detection and analytical methods. Thus, there is an urgent need for inexpensive and reproducible tests to better optimize the clinical use of ICIs. Recent findings suggest that host parameters may help to select patients to treat with ICIs: performance status (PS) and some laboratory parameters, such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and blood cells count. Inflammation and inflammatory response have been considered surrogate biomarkers of host immunity. An elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), myeloid-to-lymphocyte (MLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratio have been associated with systemic inflammation and some evidences suggest that these biomarkers could play a role as prognostic factors. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 250 patients treated with ICIs at our institution. The associations between basal NLR, MLR and PLR, clinicopathological features and their impact on progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities were assessed. Results: From May 2015 to January 2022, 250 patients were screened, of whom 66 were excluded from the analysis. A total of 184 patients (64.7% men), with a median age of 68 years (37-90) a PS 0 (52.2%), 1 (39.7%) and 2 (8.1%), were enrolled. The primary tumor origin was lung (93 adenocarcinoma, 19 squamous, 14 small cell lung cancer), urothelial (33), melanoma (4) and renal (21). Nivolumab was used in 103 patients, Pembrolizumab in 67 and atezolizumab in 18. At 24 months median follow up there were 131 progression diseases and 122 deaths. Overall, the median value of NLR, PLR and MLR was 3.15 (1-41), 168 (4-797) and 3.5 (0-245), respectively. Lower values of NLR and PLR were associated with a better median PFS (HR for NLR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4, p = 0.002; HR for PLR 2.2, 95% CI, 1.6 - 3.2, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR for NLR 1.5, 95%CI 1.1-2.2, p = 0.017; HR for PLR 1.9, 95%CI 1.3-2.7 p < 0.0001). MLR was not statistically significant. According to primary tumor origin, renal cancer reported a value significantly under the median of NLR and PLR (p = 0.015 and p = 0.021 respectively). Toxicity and clinico-pathological factors showed a significant association between female sex and both severe fatigue (p = 0.002) and pain (p = 0.018). Pain was also related to younger age (p = 0.009) and to a PS ≥2 (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Our study shows that NLR and PLR represent inexpensive, reproducible and reliable markers that may help identifying patients who can have a greater benefit from immunotherapy.

Aims and background Capecitabine is the reference treatment for anthracycline-and/or taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study examined its efficacy, tolerability and impact on the quality of life of elderly patients with MBC. Materials and methods Between January 2002 and December 2009, 75 consecutive elderly patients with MBC received first-line chemotherapy with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks. Endpoints were efficacy, tolerability and clinical-benefit response measured every 3 cycles. Results Median age was 76 years (range 65–88); median ECOG performance status was 1 (range 0–2); 51 patients (68%) had received adjuvant chemotherapy and all patients had received hormonal therapy. Median exposure was 6 cycles. After 3 cycles, 11 patients (14.7%) had a partial response, one patient experienced a complete response, and 49 patients (65.3%) had stable disease, amounting to a disease control rate of 81.3%. Stable disease was maintained in 45 patients (60%) after 6 cycles, in 21 patients (28%) after 9 cycles, and in 13 patients (17.3%) after 12 cycles. A clinical-benefit response was experienced by 42 patients (56%), indicating a positive impact on quality of life. Treatment was well tolerated, the most common grade 3 events being diarrhea (12%) hand-foot syndrome (8%), and mucositis (8%). Adverse events were managed with dose adjustments and supportive therapy when required. Conclusions Our results indicate that capecitabine is active and well tolerated in elderly patients with MBC. This dosing regimen warrants further study in the first-line setting for patients with less aggressive MBC who are not candidates for combination therapy.

1080 Background: X has demonstrated consistently high single-agent activity and good tolerability in pretreated and chemonaive MBC, and extends survival when added to docetaxel. High activity, minimal myelosuppression and no alopecia make X interesting in elderly pts with hormone-refractory disease. Methods: Between Feb 2004 and Oct 2006, 36 elderly (>65 years) MBC pts previously treated with adjuvant therapy and at least one previous hormonal therapy for advanced disease received X 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1–14 every 3 weeks. Study objectives were to assess efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life (QoL), assessed by Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) every third cycle. Results: Median age was 70 years (range 68–73), median ECOG PS was 1 (range 0–2). All pts had visceral metastasis and 19 (53%) had ≥2 metastatic sites. A total of 284 cycles were administered (median 6 cycles per pt). After 3 cycles, 10 pts (28%) showed a partial response, 16 (44%) had stable disease (SD), and 2 (6%) had a minor response, resulting in a disease control rate of 78%. Biochemical response (CEA and/or CA 15.3 reduction) was observed in 20 (56%) pts. SD was maintained in 22 pts (61%) after 6 cycles, 10 pts (28%) after 9 cycles and 2 pts (6%) after 12 cycles. Treatment was well tolerated, the most common grade 3 events being mucositis (6%) and hand-foot syndrome (6%). There were no grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities. All adverse events were easily managed with dose adjustments and supportive therapies as required. As a result, all pts (100%) complied with appreciable benefits in terms of QoL (positive CBR in 56% of pts). Conclusions: These preliminary data indicate that this X dose is active and well tolerated in elderly pts with hormone-refractory MBC. This regimen also warrants study as first-line treatment in pts with less aggressive MBC who might not be suitable for combination therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.