Search

PURPOSE Genomic profiling programs have been implemented to apply next-generation sequencing (NGS) for facilitating trial enrollment. SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN is a large-scale genomic profiling program in advanced gastrointestinal cancers using a validated genomic assay with the goal of facilitating enrollment in targeted clinical trials, generating real-world data, and performing clinicogenomic analysis for biomarker discovery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Genotyping of tumor tissue samples from 5,743 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers enrolled in GI-SCREEN was centrally performed with NGS. Patients were enrolled in matched trials of targeted agents affiliated with GI-SCREEN on the basis of genotyping results. RESULTS A total of 11 gastrointestinal cancers were included, with colorectal cancer being the most common. The median age ranged from 59 to 70.5 years across cancer types. Patients enrolled after initiation of first-line treatment had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than that before treatment initiation with a median survival time difference of 8.9 months and a hazard ratio (HR) ranging from 0.25 to 0.73 across cancer types, demonstrating an immortal time bias. One hundred and forty-nine patients received matched therapies in clinical trials on the basis of their identified alterations. Among patients with colorectal cancer harboring actionable alterations, the median OS was significantly longer in patients who received matched therapies in trials than in those who did not (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.01; P = .049). Cancer-specific pathway alterations were significantly associated with shorter survival and related to primary resistance to matched trial therapies. CONCLUSION Our genomic profiling program led to patient enrollment in targeted clinical trials and improved survival of patients with colorectal cancer who received matched therapies in clinical trials. To avoid immortal time bias, precautions are needed when using data from patients who have undergone NGS testing after initiation of the evaluated treatment line.

PURPOSE ERBB2 copy number (CN), measured using next-generation sequencing, is a predictive biomarker for trastuzumab efficacy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive advanced esophagogastric and gastric cancer (AGC). We aimed to investigate the association of ERBB2 amplification and gene coalterations with response and resistance to trastuzumab-combined chemotherapy. METHODS The SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN was a comprehensive genomic profiling project of GI cancer tissues using Oncomine Cancer Research Panel and Oncomine Comprehensive Assay. From 885 patients with AGC who successfully underwent gene profiling, 74 with ERBB2 amplification (CN ≥ 4.0) and who received first-line trastuzumab-combined chemotherapy were selected, and ERBB2 CN and gene coalterations were assessed. RESULTS ERBB2 CN did not differ in tumor response to trastuzumab-combined chemotherapy (one-way analysis of variance test, P = .37). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model revealed that ERBB2 CN (continuous log2-converted CN, hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.93; P < .01) and receptor/oncogene amplifications in the HER2 signaling pathway (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.3; P = .01) were significant predictors for progression-free survival (PFS). ERBB2 variants coexisted in five patients (7%) and were missense mutations. Two patients with low variant allele frequencies (VAFs; 8%, 12%) showed high ERBB2 CN (55, 80) and durable response (≥ 20 months), whereas three patients with high VAFs (66%–90%) showed low ERBB2 CN (8-11) and no response with short PFS (1-10 months). CONCLUSION ERBB2 CN and gene coamplification in the HER2 signaling pathway were positive and negative predictors of PFS in trastuzumab-treated HER2-positive AGC patients, respectively. HER2-positive AGC patients with a high VAF of ERBB2 showed poor outcomes and may need HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors and trastuzumab deruxtecan.

Safety of combination chemotherapy using platinum and fluorouracil has not been evaluated adequately for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in elderly patients.We initiated a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) as first-line therapy for patients with AGC aged ≥70 years. Planned assessment of toxicity was made upon recruitment of the first 20 patients.In five out of 20 patients, unacceptable toxicity was observed, including three patients who were unable to complete the initial two courses due to adverse events. Among the other 15 patients, dose reduction due to toxicity were needed in 10 and treatment delay for adverse events also occurred in 12 patients during the first two courses.Early analyses of safety suggest that the CapeOX regimen was not tolerated without dose reduction for elderly patients with AGC in this study.

This phase 1b trial evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of S-1, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination therapy (S-IROX) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC).Patients aged 20-75 years with APC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible to receive escalating doses of S-1 (60 or 80 mg msup2/sup·day) on days 1-7, fixed doses of oxaliplatin (85 mg/msup2/sup) biweekly, and escalating doses of irinotecan (150, 165, or 180 mg/msup2/sup) once every 2 weeks. In the dose-escalation cohort, a 3 + 3 design was used to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and explore the recommended dose (RD). A dose-expansion cohort was added to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination. This trial was registered at UMIN-CTR (UMIN000012054).Approximately 47 patients were enrolled, of whom 45 were eligible for the analysis. The MTD was not determined, but the RD was determined to be dose level 1 based on a review of data from each level. Among the 45 patients, the ORR was 51.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 35.8-66.3%]. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.1-8.8 months) and 15.8 months (95% CI, 9.8-20.8 months), respectively. Common adverse events included neutropenia, elevated liver enzyme levels, diarrhoea, and nausea.The S-IROX regimen showed promising efficacy with manageable toxicities in Japanese patients with APC. A randomised phase 2/3 trial comparing S-IROX, mFOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is currently ongoing (jRCTs031190009).

BackgroundBiliary tract cancer (BTC) has a poor prognosis and lacks a standardized second-line therapy. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 4, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) are highly expressed in BTC. Therefore, lenvatinib (a known inhibitor of VEGF receptors 1–3, FGFRs 1–4, and PDGFR-α) was evaluated for second-line treatment of BTC.MethodsIn this single-arm, multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study, patients with BTC received lenvatinib 24 mg orally once daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS rate at 12 weeks, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, safety and pharmacokinetic profiles.ResultsTwenty-six Japanese patients were enrolled and treated; 3 had a confirmed partial response per investigator assessment and per independent imaging review (IIR); ORR was 11.5% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2–27.2). Median PFS was 3.19 months (95% CI: 2.79–7.23) per investigator assessment and 1.64 months (95% CI: 1.41–3.19) per IIR. Median OS was 7.35 months (95% CI: 4.50–11.27). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 21 patients (80.8%) and included hypertension (n = 10 [38.5%]), proteinuria (n = 3 [11.5%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (n = 3 [11.5%]), decreased appetite (n = 3 [11.5%]), and anemia (n = 3 [11.5%]). Two deaths occurred due to TEAEs between treatment initiation and 30 days after last dose, but neither were considered treatment related.ConclusionsLenvatinib demonstrated antitumor activity in BTC, with a tolerable safety profile, and should be further evaluated as potential second-line therapy for this difficult to treat population.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT02579616. Date of registration: October 19, 2015.

Background/aim Amino acids are among the most important nutrients for supplying energy and building protein blocks in cancers. L-type amino acid transporter (LAT) 1 is known to play a critical role in cancer growth. We have completed the first-in-human phase I study using the LAT1-specific inhibitor JPH203. Patients and methods We evaluated plasma free amino acids (PFAAs), body mass index (BMI), and efficacy of JPH203 in patients enrolled in the phase I study. Results LAT1-substrate PFAAs and branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) were higher in patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) than in those with other cancers. High inhibition of uptake of LAT1-substrate PFAAs was associated with survival. BMI of more than the median was associated with disease control and survival. BCAAs tended to be associated with BMI. Conclusion BCAAs and BMI are useful predictors of the efficacy of JPH203, which shows promising activity against BTC.

348 Background: CapeOX is a standard regimen for treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, limited data are available for its use in the elderly patients. Geriatric assessment (GA) assessment is also considered important other than the age. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CapeOX as a first-line therapy for AGC in elderly patients. We performed GA assessments using the G8, and the MINI-COG. Methods: The inclusion criteria were: HER2-negative or unknown status, age 70 years or older, PS 0 or 1, no history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and an evaluable lesion based on the RECIST v1.1 guidelines. The initial treatment plan consisted of capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2, b.i.d., on days 1–14), and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, on day 1) every three weeks. After the initial feasibility assessment, the treatment plan was modified and consisted of capecitabine (750 mg/m2, b.i.d., on days 1–14) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2, on day 1) every three weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). G8 assessments were performed before the beginning of the treatment, every three months after the start of the treatment, and at the end of the treatment. MINI-COG assessments were performed before the beginning of the treatment, and at the end of the treatment. Results: Between November 2016 and June 2020, 108 patients were enrolled, out of which 104 were evaluated. Thirty-nine patients received the initial treatment whereas sixty-five patients received the modified treatment. The primary endpoint was met. The median OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-treatment failure (TTF) were 12.9 (95% CI: 11.7–14.8), 5.8 (95% CI: 5.1–7.1), and 4.3 (95% CI: 3.9–5.7) months, respectively, for all patients. The median OS, PFS, and TTF for the initial treatment plan were 13.4 (95% CI: 9.6–16.0), 5.8 (95% CI: 4.1–7.9), and 5.3 (95% CI: 3.5–7.3) months, respectively, and for the modified treatment plan were 12.8 (95% CI: 11.3–15.3), 5.7 (95% CI: 4.4–7.0), and 4.2 (95% CI: 3.7–5.7) months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities in the initial treatment plan patients were neutropenia (17.9%), anemia (12.8%), thrombocytopenia (12.8%), anorexia (10.3%), and nausea (10.3%) and in the modified treatment plan patients were (13.8%) and anorexia (12.3%). Mean G8 score was 11.4 before the treatment, 13.4 during the treatment and 11.6 at the end of the treatment. Mean MINI-COG score was 4.0 before the treatment, and 4.1 at the end of the treatment and the positive screen for dementia was 13.5% before the treatment and 11.4% at the end of the treatment. Conclusions: Our results show that the modified treatment plan is favorable for the elderly patients with gastric cancer based on the OS and the toxicities. Clinical trial information: 000022450 .

Aflibercept plus 5‐fluorouracil/levofolinate/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) is a second‐line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. This ancillary exploratory analysis of data in Japanese people was aimed at exploring the relationship between a set of potential prognostic biomarkers and efficacy endpoints following aflibercept plus FOLFIRI therapy. Sixty‐two patients with metastatic colorectal cancer received aflibercept (4 mg/kg) plus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks. Seventy‐eight potential protein biomarkers were chosen for analysis based on their roles in angiogenesis, tumor progression, and tumor‐stroma interaction. Plasma levels of biomarkers at baseline and at pre‐dose 3 (day 1 of treatment cycle 3) were measured in all patients by ELISA. Relationships between these levels and efficacy endpoints were assessed. Ten potential biomarkers had a ±30% change from baseline to pre‐dose 3 (adjusted P

The Japan Clinical Oncology Group established a policy for geriatric oncology research suggesting several solutions for various issues which commonly occur in geriatric research., Due to the rapid aging of Japan’s population, clinical research focusing on older patients with cancer is urgently needed. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) has conducted several such clinical trials, but there has been no formal policy for geriatric research. We have therefore established a JCOG policy for geriatric cancer research. We defined the patient selection policy based on treatment tolerance and chronological age. Older patients are categorized into three conceptual groups: ‘fit patients’ who can undergo the same standard treatment given to younger patients, ‘frail patients’ for whom best supportive or palliative care is indicated and ‘vulnerable patients’ who fall between the fit and frail categories. Unmet needs often exist for vulnerable patients. The policy recommends that study endpoints include not only survival but also other endpoints such as physical and cognitive function because the objective of therapy in older patients is not only extended life expectancy but also maintenance of the patient’s general condition. In this viewpoint, co-primary or composite endpoints that incorporate geriatric assessment in the study design are often applicable. Study design will differ depending on the study population, clinical question, and treatment. Even for older patients, a randomized clinical trial is still the gold standard when the clinical question asks which treatment is better. An observational study of a broader population is applicable for investigating actual conditions of older patients. This JCOG Geriatric Research Policy includes several practical solutions for various issues in geriatric research. We plan to revise this policy periodically to guide future geriatric research.

Aflibercept targets vascular endothelial growth factor. The present study involved assessing the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of aflibercept plus 5-fluorouracil/levofolinate/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as a second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Japanese patients. Aflibercept (4 mg/kg) plus FOLFIRI was administered every 2 weeks in 62 patients with mCRC until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient withdrawal. Tumors were imaged every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics of aflibercept, irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil. A total of 60 patients were evaluated for ORR; 50 had received prior bevacizumab. The ORR was 8.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3%-15.3%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 80.0% (69.9%-90.1%). The median progression-free survival was 5.42 months (4.14-6.70 months) and the median overall survival was 15.59 months (11.20-19.81 months). No treatment-related deaths were observed, and no significant drug-drug interactions were found. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia and decreased appetite. Free aflibercept had a mean maximum concentration (coefficient of variation) of 73.2 μg/mL (15%), clearance of 0.805 L/d (22%) and volume of distribution of 6.2 L (18%); aflibercept bound with vascular endothelial growth factor had a clearance of 0.162 L/d (9%) (N = 62). Aflibercept did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan or 5-fluorouracil: The clearance was 11.1 L/h/m2 (28%) for irinotecan and, at steady state, 72.6 L/h/m2 (56%) for 5-fluorouracil (N = 10). Adding aflibercept to FOLFIRI was shown to be beneficial and well-tolerated in Japanese patients with mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01882868.

Purpose Patients with RAS-positive tumors respond poorly to chemotherapies and have a few treatment options. Salirasib is an oral RAS inhibitor that competitively blocks the membrane association of RAS proteins. The aim of this phase I multiple-ascending-dose clinical trial was to investigate the safety and pharmacokinetics of Salirasib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors and to explore its efficacy. Methods Salirasib was started at a dose of 100-mg twice-daily and escalated to a maximum of 1000-mg twice-daily from days 1 to 21 of a 28-day regimen. The pharmacokinetics was evaluated on days 1 and 21. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the trial. Patients with stable disease or better repeated the dosing regimen. Results A total of 21 patients received Salirasib. Among 14 patients tested, 4 had KRAS mutations. Cmax and AUCinf were maximal at 800 mg. No maximum tolerable dose was discerned, as no DLT was observed in any dosing group. The most frequently observed AEs were gastrointestinal disturbances, including diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea. No AEs led to discontinuation. All patients completed the first regimen and 11 patients repeated the regimen (median: 2 cycles; range: 1–13). Patients with KRAS mutations showed median progression-free survival of 227 days (range: 79–373). Conclusion Salirasib was safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients, and 800-mg twice-daily is recommended for phase II trials. Although the number of participants with KRAS mutations was limited, the remarkably long progression-free period warrants further investigation. Clinical trial registration JAPIC Clinical Trials Information; JapicCTI-121751. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-018-3618-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ramucirumab, a monoclonal antibody vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antagonist, given as monotherapy improved survival in a global phase 3 study (REGARD) of patients with gastric cancer. However, REGARD did not include Japanese patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer. This multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized phase 2 study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01983878) was performed at 16 Japanese sites. Patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer after disease progression following first-line chemotherapy received intravenous ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Primary efficacy outcome: 12-week progression-free survival rate (PFS). Thirty-six patients were enrolled. The 12-week PFS rate was 23.8% [90% confidence interval (CI) 12.4–37.2); the primary outcome was not met as the lower limit of the CI was outside the threshold of 16%. Median PFS was 6.6 weeks (90% CI 6.1–7.1). No patients achieved an objective response, and 11 (31%) patients achieved disease control. Median overall survival was 8.6 months (90% CI 5.7–10.7). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea (9/36; 25%) and decreased appetite (8/36; 22%). Three patients reported Grade ≥ 3 ileus; all other Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported by ≤ 2 patients. The most frequent adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were hypertension (10/36; 28%), bleeding/hemorrhage (7/36; 19%), and proteinuria (7/36; 19%). All Grade ≥ 3 AESIs were reported by ≤ 2 patients. These findings suggest that ramucirumab monotherapy has clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with gastric cancer after disease progression following first-line chemotherapy.

Lessons Learned Axitinib exhibited marginal activity against gemcitabine-refractory unselected biliary tract cancer. Pretreated soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 may be a useful biomarker for axitinib treatment outcome. Ascites should be carefully monitored in patients receiving anti–vascular endothelial growth factor receptor therapy including axitinib in advanced biliary tract cancer. Background There are no clear options for second-line treatment in patients with gemcitabine (GEM)-refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC). We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial to confirm the efficacy and safety of axitinib, a potent selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1/2/3, in patients with GEM-refractory BTC. Methods Patients refractory or intolerant to GEM-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Axitinib was administered orally at an initial dose of 5 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the threshold and expected values were set at 2 and 3 months, respectively. The target sample size was 32 patients. Results Nineteen patients were enrolled. The trial was interrupted for a total of 13 months for the evaluation of adverse events. Thirteen patients were previously treated with ≥2 regimens. The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.1–4.1). The median overall survival was 5.8 months (95% CI: 3.3–9.7). The response rate was 5.3% (95% CI: 0.0–15.3). Grade 3 ascites occurred in two patients. Baseline soluble VEGFR-2 levels were significantly associated with PFS. Conclusion Axitinib exhibited marginal activity against GEM-refractory BTC. Ascites should be carefully monitored in axitinib-treated patients with advanced BTC.

Background No standard second-line chemotherapy has been yet established for gemcitabine-refractory biliary tract cancer (BTC). Patients and methods We conducted multivariable Cox regression analysis to examine the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients who had received gemcitabine-based treatment. Results Forty-six patients received second-line chemotherapy. The median serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) value was 487 U/ml. The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) was: 0 (n=24), 1 (n=10), or 2 (n=10). The second-line chemotherapy included: S-1 in 20 patients, gemcitabine-based in 20, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in five. The median OS was 8.3 months, and the median progression-free survival was 3.0 months. Multivariate analysis identified serum CA 19-9 ≥500 U/ml, mGPS ≥1, and presence of liver metastasis as significant prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion Second-line chemotherapy for gemcitabine-refractory BTC remains inadequate. Randomized trials with appropriate stratification criteria are required.

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients previously treated for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in Japanese and Western subgroups from the RAINBOW trial.Patients received ramucirumab at 8 mg/kg or placebo (days 1 and 15) plus paclitaxel at 80 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle). End points were compared between treatment arms within Japanese (N = 140) and Western (N = 398) populations.The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was higher for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in both populations (Japanese population, 83.8 % vs 52.1 %; Western population, 79.1 % vs 61.9 %). Neutropenia was the commonest adverse event of grade 3 or higher, with a higher incidence for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (Japanese population, 66.2 % vs 25.4 %; Western population, 32.1 % vs 14.7 %). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was low and was similar between treatment arms in both populations. The overall survival hazard ratio was 0.88 (95 % confidence interval, 0.60-1.28) in the Japanese population and 0.73 (95 % confidence interval, 0.58-0.91) in the Western population. The progression-free survival hazard ratio was 0.50 (95 % confidence interval, 0.35-0.73) in the Japanese population and 0.63 (95 % confidence interval, 0.51-0.79) in the Western population. The objective response rate was higher for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in both populations (Japanese population, 41.2 % vs 19.4 %; Western population, 26.8 % vs 13.0 %), as was the 6-month survival rate (Japanese population, 94.1 % vs 71.4 %; Western population, 66.0 % vs 49.0 %).Safety profiles of the ramucirumab plus paclitaxel arm were similar between populations, though there was a higher incidence of neutropenia in Japanese patients. Progression-free survival and objective response rate improvements were observed for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in both populations. CLINICALTRIALS.NCT01170663.

Background/aim Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) has been identified as a treatment target for biliary tract cancer (BTC) and axitinib is a selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1/2/3. This study was conducted as a preliminary evaluation of the safety and efficacy of axitinib for patients with advanced BTC. Patients and methods Patients refractory to gemcitabine-based regimens were administered axitinib at the dose of 5 mg twice daily. Results Five patients (3 male and 2 female) with a median age of 68 years were enrolled. Although 3 patients developed treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), none of these patients required discontinuation of the protocol treatment due to the AEs. Partial response (PR) was achieved in 1 patient, with a 67% reduction. The response was classified as stable disease (SD) in 3 patients and as progressive disease (PD) in 1 patient. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 2.0 to 19.9 months and 1.5 to 7.4 months, respectively. Conclusion This preliminary study suggested that axitinib is well-tolerated and might exert promising activity in patients with BTC.

A phase 1 study of pazopanib alone or in combination with lapatinib was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of these oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Japanese patients with solid tumors.In part A (monotherapy), 7 patients initially received pazopanib 800 mg/day, the recommended dose for non-Japanese patients. Then, 3 patients received pazopanib 400 mg/day on day 1 followed by 800 mg/day from day 2 onward. Three other patients received pazopanib 1,000 mg/day. In part B (combination therapy), 17 patients received pazopanib plus lapatinib (pazopanib/lapatinib) at once-daily doses of 400/1,000 mg (4 patients), 800/1,000 mg (3 patients), 400/1,500 mg (3 patients), and then 600/1,250 mg (7 patients).There was no dose-limiting toxicity during the study. In part A, most drug-related adverse events were grade 2 or lower, including neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased, thrombocytopenia/platelet count decreased, diarrhea, hypertension, aspartate aminotransferase increased, and lipase increased. In part B, rash, decreased appetite, and serum thyroid-stimulating hormone increased also occurred. In all dose groups, the plasma concentrations after multiple doses of pazopanib exceeded the target trough concentration for inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 activity (20 μg/mL).The pharmacokinetic profiles of pazopanib and lapatinib in Japanese patients were not apparently different from those reported in non-Japanese patients. There were no consistent trends in pharmacokinetic drug interactions between pazopanib and lapatinib. Pazopanib monotherapy at 800 and 1,000 mg once daily and pazopanib plus lapatinib once daily at any doses studied were well tolerated in Japanese patients.

Background Gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy has been used worldwide as the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). A phase II trial has also suggested promising activity of GEM plus S-1 chemotherapy against advanced BTC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GEM plus S-1 chemotherapy in patients with advanced BTC. Patients and methods The eligibility criteria were as follows: histologically-proven BTC, unresectable or recurrent disease, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1 regardless of previous treatment. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously at the dose of 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 min on days 1 and 8, and S-1 was administered orally at doses of 60/80/100 mg/day based on the BSA, from day 1 to day 14, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the response rate according to RECIST, ver. 1.1, and the secondary endpoints were the frequency/severity of toxicities, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 38 patients were enrolled between August 2008 and November 2011. There were 19 men and 19 women, with a median age of 66 years (range=44-81 years). Seven patients had a previous history of first-line or adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The PS was 0 and 1 in 30 and 7 patients, respectively. The treatment response was classified as partial response in 6 patients (15.8%) and as stable disease in 18 patients (47.4%). The median PFS and OS were 5.8 and 15.9 months, respectively. The toxicity was generally mild, and the most common grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia (31.6%), neutropenia (36.8%), nausea/vomiting (2.6%), and diarrhea (2.6%). There was one treatment-related death due to interstitial pneumonia. Conclusion Our study revealed that gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy was well-tolerated and exhibited favorable antitumor activity in patients with advanced BTC.

TPS1100 Background: Systemic chemotherapy with anti-HER2 therapy is the standard of care for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. Patient outcomes have improved remarkably with the use of novel anti-HER2 drugs, including trastuzumab (H), pertuzumab (P), and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). The combination treatment comprising H, P, and docetaxel (D) (HPD) is highly recommended as the 1st-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. In contrast, for elderly patients over 65 years of age, this regimen seems to be intolerable mentally and physically, and impairs their quality of life. A new standard treatment with less toxicity and non-inferior efficacy for elderly patients is needed. Methods: We have planned a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial to confirm the non-inferiority of T-DM1 compared to HPD in terms of overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. The eligibility criteria are as follows: 1) histologically proven metastatic breast cancer, 2) age 65-74 years with a performance status (PS) score 0-2, or 75-79 years with a PS score 0-1, 3) HER2 overexpression or amplification confirmed in primary or metastatic tissues, and 4) no anti-HER2 therapy with chemotherapy for breast cancer, excluding (neo) adjuvant therapy. Patients are randomized to receive either HPD (H 6 mg/kg, P 420 mg/body, and D 60 mg/m2) or T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The dose up of D (75 mg/m2) after the second cycle is defined based on the data regarding safety during the first cycle. The primary endpoint is OS. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, response rate, adverse events, breast cancer-related death, and deterioration of activities of daily living. The trial is designed to achieve 70% power to confirm non-inferiority of T-DM1 to HPD at a one-sided alpha of 5% with a non-inferiority margin of 1.3 in terms of hazard ratio. With a median OS of 30 months in both arms, 6 years of accrual, and 5 years of follow up, the planned sample size is 330. The trial began in January 2018 and nineteen patients have been enrolled as of January 2019. Clinical trial information: UMIN000030783.

e15106 Background: Tumor mismatch repair (MMR) predicts benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We conducted a large-scale prospective observational trial on microsatellite instability (MSI) status in mCRC: SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN CRC-MSI. Methods: mCRC patients (pts) appropriate for systemic chemotherapy were eligible. Paired tumor and normal DNA extracted from FFPE samples were analyzed by the MSI Analysis System, which includes 5 mononucleotide markers. Tumors exhibiting ≥2 unstable markers were defined as MSI-H, while those with ≤1 were labelled MSI-L/MSS. Results: From 2/2016 to 3/2018, 1,711 pts were enrolled, and 1,696 samples were submitted. MSI status was determined in 1,676 pts (98.8%); 51 pts (3.0%) were MSI-H. For MSI-H vs. MSI-L/MSS pts: Median age (years) 64/64; male gender (%) 51.0 vs. 43.8, p=0.31; right-sided primary (%) 70.6 vs. 25.0, p20 mt/Mb, was observed in 27/29 (93.1%) MSI-H pts. The frequency of representative gene mutations (%) for MSI-H vs. MSI-L/MSS pts were: TP53 17.2 vs. 66.1, p

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Methods: This phase I dose-finding study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD) or both of FOLFOXIRI. Patients with UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*6/*6, *28/*28 and *6/*28 genotypes were excluded, because these UGT1A1 genotypes are linked to severe neutropenia in Japanese. Results: A total of 10 Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer were studied. The MTD of FOLFOXIRI in these Japanese patients was 165 mg/m2 irinotecan, 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 2,400 mg/m2 5-FU. Accordingly, the RD of FOLFOXIRI was determined to be 150 mg/m2 irinotecan, 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 2,400 mg/m2 5-FU. Toxic effects, evaluated until the completion of 4 cycles, were manageable. Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 27% of cycles, but there was no febrile neutropenia. Among the 9 assessable patients, the objective response rate was 89%. Conclusions: We thus determined the RD of FOLFOXIRI in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer who do not have UGT1A1*28/*28, *6/*6 or *6/*28 genotypes. Our results indicate that FOLFOXIRI is a well-tolerated regimen for these Japanese patients.

Objective: This phase I/II study determined the recommended dose of FOLFIRI (irinotecan, infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin) for Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer, and evaluated safety at the recommended dose in patients without the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*28 allele which caused reduced enzyme expression. Methods: The phase I part assessed the maximum tolerated dose of FOLFIRI to determine the recommended doses of irinotecan and infusional 5-fluorouracil. The doses were escalated from 150 to 180 mg/m 2 (irinotecan) and 2000 to 2400 mg/m 2 (5-fluorouracil). UDPglucuronosyltransferase 1A1*6 and *28, and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan were observationally examined. In the phase II part, patients without the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*28 allele received FOLFIRI at the recommended dose to evaluate safety. Results: Among 15 patients in the phase I part, dose-limiting toxicity (diarrhea) occurred in one patient who received 150 mg/m 2 irinotecan and 2400 mg/m 2 infusional 5-fluorouracil. The respective recommended doses were 180 and 2400 mg/m 2 for irinotecan and infusional 5-fluorouracil, without reaching the maximum tolerated dose. Twenty-five patients received FOLFIRI at the recommended doses. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 44%, and Grade 3 diarrhea in 4%. Conclusions: This phase I/II study demonstrates that the recommended doses of irinotecan and infusional 5-fluorouracil in FOLFIRI for Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer who do not possess the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*28 allele are 180 and 2400 mg/m 2 , respectively. Toxicities occurring at the recommended doses are manageable in

Differences in efficacy and toxicity between UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*1/*1 and *1/*6 or *1/*28 genotypes remain unclear in Japanese patients. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer who received irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil plus l-leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line therapy were divided into two groups: those with UGT1A1*1/*1 genotype and those with UGT1A1*1/*6 or *1/*28 genotype. Efficacy and toxicity were compared between these groups retrospectively. Forty-two patients (24 *1/*1 and 18 *1/*6 or *1/*28) were evaluated. The response rate was 48% in *1/*1 group and 56% in *1/*6 or *1/*28 group (P = 0.847). Median progression-free survival was 8.6 months in *1/*1 group and 8.5 months in *1/*6 or *1/*28 group (P = 0.888). No hematologic or non-hematologic toxic effects were clearly related to UGT1A1*1/*6 or *1/*28 during the first cycle or throughout the entire course of chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in the efficacy or toxicity of FOLFIRI between patients with UGT1A1*1/*1 genotype and those with UGT1A1*1/*6 or *1/*28 genotype. Our results suggest that patients with the latter genotypes can receive FOLFIRI at the same dose of irinotecan as those with the UGT1A1*1/*1 genotype receive.

2519Background: The uptake of amino acids is essential for cancer growth. The L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) is overexpressed in various cancers, and the LAT1-mediated uptake of plasma-free...

419 Background: Uptake of amino acids is essential for cancer growth. L-type amino acid transporter-1 (LAT-1) is overexpressed in various cancers, and uptake of LAT-1 substrate amino acids is known to have a critical role in cancer growth. JPH203 is a novel, selective, LAT-1 inhibitor. A first-in-human phase I study of JPH203 was designed to determine the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose. This study included evaluation of the anti-tumor effect, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of JPH203 and analyzed plasma free amino acids. Methods: JPH203 was administered intravenously for 7 days followed by 21 days’ rest at planned doses ranging from 12 to 110 mg/m2 in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy. Before starting this schedule, we confirmed safety of a single dose of JPH203. Dose-limiting toxicity was evaluated during the first cycle, using a 3+3 design. Results: 17 patients were enrolled from January 2015 to August 2016. One patient was discontinued after a single dose of JPH203 because of tumor progression. Dosage was escalated up to 85 mg/m2. Grade 3 liver dysfunction occurred in 1 of 6 patients at 60 mg/m2 and in the first patient at 85 mg/m2. Therefore, it was determined that MTD was 60 mg/m2. Common treatment-related adverse events were increased ALT/AST, malaise, nausea, hypertension and fever of Grade 1 or 2. Partial response was achieved in a patient with biliary tract cancer (BTC) who continued JPH203 for two years without progression. Disease control (PR+SD) was observed in 3 of 5 patients with BTC and 2 of 6 with colorectal cancer. LAT-1 substrate amino acids and branched chain amino acids including LAT-1 substrate amino acids were higher in patients with BTC than in those with other cancers. All patients with disease control had a body mass index more than the median of 20.5 kg/m2. In exploratory analysis, longer survival was achieved in patients with high inhibition of uptake of LAT-1 substrate amino acids, compared with patients with low inhibition of uptake. Conclusions: JPH203 was well tolerated, resulting in promise against BTC. This phase I study suggested that LAT-1 could be targeted in treatment for advanced BTC, because LAT-1 substrate amino acids in plasma tended to remain high. Clinical trial information: UMIN000016546.

To investigate the effects of genetic polymorphisms on morphine-induced adverse events in cancer patients. We examined the relation of morphine-related adverse events to polymorphisms in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7, ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B, number 1 (ABCB1), and μ-opioid receptor 1 genes in 32 Japanese cancer patients receiving oral controlled-release morphine sulfate tablets. The T/T genotype at 1236 or TT/TT diplotype at 2677 and 3435 in ABCB1 was associated with significantly lower frequency of fatigue (grades 1–3) (P = 0.012 or 0.011, Fisher’s exact test). The UGT2B7*2 genotype was associated with the frequency of nausea (grades 1–3) (P = 0.023). The frequency of nausea was higher in patients without UGT2B7*2 allele than others. The diplotype at 2677 and 3435 in ABCB1 was associated with the frequency of vomiting (grades 1–3) (P = 0.011). No patient whose diplotype was consisted of no GC allele at 2677 and 3435 suffered from vomiting. Our findings suggest that pharmacogenetics can be used to predict the risk of morphine-induced adverse events.

Purpose: Recently, an objective response rate of 12% was reported in a phase II study of cetuximab in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy (IMC-0144). In this large molecular correlates study, we tested whether K-ras mutation status and polymorphisms in genes involved in the EGFR-signaling pathway were associated with clinical outcome in IMC-0144.Experimental Design: We analyzed all available tissue samples from 130 of 346 mCRC patients enrolled in the IMC-0144 phase II clinical trial of cetuximab. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues, and K-ras mutation status and the genotypes were analyzed using PCR-RFLP, direct DNA-sequencing, and 5′-end [γ-33P] ATP–labeled PCR-protocols.Results: The PFS of patients with cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) −765 G>C [C/C; risk ratio (RR), 0.31; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.12-0.84; P = 0.032], COX-2 +8473 T>C (C/C; RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40-1.13; P = 0.003), EGF +61 A>G (G/G; RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = 0.042), and EGFR +497 G>A (A/G; RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.56-1.20; P = 0.017) genotypes was significantly longer compared with those with other genotypes. In addition, patients whose tumors did not have K-ras mutations showed better RR, PFS, and overall survival than patients with K-ras mutations. In multivariable analysis, COX-2 +8473 T>C (adjusted P = 0.013) and EGFR +497 G>A (adjusted P = 0.010) remained significantly associated with progression-free survival, independent of skin rash toxicity, K-ras mutation status, and Eastern Cooperative Group performance status.Conclusions: Polymorphisms in COX-2 and EGFR may be useful independent molecular markers to predict clinical outcome in patients with mCRC treated with single-agent cetuximab, independent of skin rash toxicity, K-ras mutation, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

Background: We have reported that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in gastric cancers might be a selective marker between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and a combination of 5-FU plus cisplatin (CDDP). In this study, the relationship between VEGF expression and effects of S-1 with and without CDDP is investigated. Methods: The subjects were 44 patients treated with S-1 (40 mg/m 2 , twice daily, days 1‐28, repeated every 6 weeks) and 24 patients treated with S-1 plus CDDP (S-1 40 mg/m 2 ,t wice daily, days 1‐21, CDDP, 60 or 70 mg/m 2 , day 8, repeated every 5 weeks). VEGF expression in pretreatment endoscopic biopsy samples was assessed immunohistochemically. Results: Median survival times (MST) of the patients treated with S-1 and S-1 plus CDDP were 344 and 388 days. Among evaluable patients, the response rates of patients with VEGF (þ )a nd (2) tumors to S-1 were 40% (6/15) and 54% (13/24), and to S-1 plus CDDP, 79% (15/19) and 80% (4/5). While the survival of patients with VEGF (2) tumors was slightly longer than those with VEGF (þ) tumors in the S-1 group (MST, 425 versus 308 days, P ¼ 0.42), patients with VEGF (þ) tumors survived remarkably longer than those with VEGF (2) tumors in the S-1 plus CDDP group (MST, 570 versus 333 days, P ¼ 0.19). Conclusion: Similarly to our previous study, it is suggested that the effects of adding CDDP to S-1 might be more remarkable in gastric cancer patients with VEGF (þ) tumors than in those with VEGF (2) tumors. These results should be confirmed in a large phase III study.

Objective There is little information about the patterns of care for elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients, and a standardized strategy has not been established. Therefore, we conducted a questionnaire survey about the patterns of care for these patients. Methods On September 2014, the questionnaires were sent to all 43 institutions of the Japan Esophageal Oncology Group, which comprised five parts: (i) definition of 'elderly' (age, method), (ii) basic treatment strategy according to stage and elderly status (fit/vulnerable/frail), (iii) patterns of care in each stage, (iv) considerations about conducting future clinical trials and (v) other information about geriatric oncology concerning esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Results All answers were obtained by January 2015. Nearly half institutions (47%) considered the chronological definition of elderly to be over 80 years old. Among 43 institutions, 36 (84%) reported that the type of comorbidity and performance status were important factors for decision-making; no institution selected geriatric scale as an indicator. The most selected treatment strategy in fit healthy elderly patients was the same as the standard treatment of non-elderly patients. Radiation alone was considered the main treatment for vulnerable and frail esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Most of the institutions answered that clinical trials for the elderly are warranted. Most institutions (70%) chose Stage II/III (non-T4) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma as an important investigational target. Conclusions Fit healthy elderly were considered the same as non-elderly patients, although there are no established treatment selection criteria. Radiation alone plays most important role in the treatment for vulnerable and frail esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Stage II/III (non-T4) disease is attractive and warranted for future investigations.

Pharmacogenetic testing for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*28, a promoter variant of the UGT1A1 gene, is now carried out clinically to estimate the risk of irinotecan-associated toxicity. We studied the clinical significance of UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*27, two variants in exon 1 of the UGT1A1 gene that are found mainly in Asians. The study group comprised 46 Japanese patients who received various regimens of chemotherapy including irinotecan at doses from 50 to 180 mg/m(2). Pharmacogenetic relationships were explored between the UGT1A1 genotype and the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN-38) to that of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), used as a surrogate for UGT1A1 activity (AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G)). No patient was homozygous for UGT1A1*28, and none had UGT1A1*27. Two were heterozygous for UGT1A1*28. Two were homozygous and 15 heterozygous for UGT1A1*6, all of whom were wild type with respect to UGT1A1*28. Two patients were simultaneously heterozygous for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, present on different chromosomes. The other 25 patients had none of the variants studied. The two patients simultaneously heterozygous for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 and the two patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 had significantly higher AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G) ratios than the others (P = 0.0039). Concurrence of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, even when heterozygous, altered the disposition of irinotecan remarkably, potentially increasing susceptibility to toxicity. Patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 should also be carefully monitored. UGT1A1 polymorphisms in the coding region of the UGT1A1 gene should be genotyped in addition to testing for UGT1A1*28 to more accurately predict irinotecan-related toxicity, at least in Asian patients.

A dose-escalation study of cisplatin (CDDP) combined with S-1, a new oral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidine, was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and objective response rate (RR) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). S-1 was given orally at 40 mg m(-2) b.i.d. for 21 consecutive days following a 2-week rest. CDDP was planned to be given intravenously on day 8, at a dose of 60, 70, or 80 mg m(-2) depending on the DLT. Treatment was repeated every 5 weeks, unless disease progression was observed. In the phase I portion, the MTD of CDDP was presumed to be 70 mg m(-2), because 33.3% of patients (2/6) developed DLTs, mainly neutropenia. Therefore, the RD of CDDP was estimated as 60 mg m(-2). In the phase II portion, 19 patients including six patients of the RD phase I portion were evaluated. The median administered courses was four (range: 1-8). The incidences of severe (grades 3-4) haematological and nonhaematological toxicities were 15.8 and 26.3%, respectively, but all were manageable. The RR was 74% (14/19, 95% confidence interval: 54.9-90.6%), and the median survival day was 383. This regimen is considered to be active against AGC with acceptable toxicity.

310 Background: LEN inhibits the activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor–α. These targets have been shown to be expressed in patients (pts) with BTC. The objective of this study is to evaluate LEN as a potential treatment option for these pts. Methods: This is an open-label, phase 2 study conducted in Japan. Pts aged ≥ 20 years with confirmed diagnosis of unresectable BTC, measureable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1, and 1 prior gemcitabine-based doublet chemotherapy, will receive LEN 24 mg/d. The primary endpoint is objective response rate. Secondary objectives include disease control rate (DCR), safety, and pharmacokinetics. Enrollment of 25 pts is planned. The study includes an interim evaluation for futility. If there is no objective response and disease control is achieved in < 5 pts of 15‒17 pts, the study will end. Results: An interim evaluation was performed with 17 pts enrolled (data cutoff: 25 July 2016). Ten (59%) pts were aged < 65 years, 10 (59%) were male, 2 (12%) had prior surgery, and 13 (76%) received prior gemcitabine + cisplatin therapy. Efficacy results appear in the table. One pt had a partial response (PR) and 13 had stable disease (SD). The DCR was 82%. All pts experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs occurred in 11 (65%) and serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 7 (41%) pts. There were no fatal SAEs. TEAEs leading to LEN discontinuation, dose reduction, and dose interruption occurred in 1 (6%), 12 (71%), and 9 (53%) pts, respectively. Analysis of trough plasma concentration in 13 pts from this study showed no difference versus that observed in a previous phase 3 study of LEN in differentiated thyroid cancer. Conclusions: Because results of this interim evaluation did not meet futility criteria, the study was continued, with findings suggesting possible activity of LEN in pts with unresectable BTC who failed gemcitabine-based doublet chemotherapy. Toxicities were generally manageable with dose modifications as only 1 pt required discontinuation from LEN. Clinical trial information: NCT02579616. [Table: see text]

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy (FGS) in patients with gemcitabine (GEM)-refractory pancreatic cancer (PC) and to explore independent variables associated with survival. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with GEM-refractory PC who received FGS at our institution from March 2009 to December 2013. GEM was administered by fixed dose rate intravenous infusion of 1,200 mg/m2 as a 120-min infusion on day 1, and S-1 was administered orally twice a day at a dose of 40 mg/m2 on days 1–7. Cycles were repeated every 14 days. Sixty-one patients with GEM-refractory PC received FGS. Sixteen patients received FGS as third-line treatment. Twenty-nine patients (48 %) had a history of S-1 administration. The objective response rate was 13 %, and the disease control rate was 49 %. The median progression-free survival time was 2.7 months, and the median overall survival time was 6.0 months. Major Grade 3 or 4 adverse events included neutropenia (15 %), diarrhea (3 %), anorexia (2 %), and fatigue (2 %). A high inflammation-based prognostic score (modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), which incorporates C-reactive protein and albumin), a performance status >0, and serum carbohydrate antigen 19–9 level >2,000 IU/ml were independently associated with a poor outcome. FGS might be effective and well tolerated as salvage chemotherapy in a practical setting. The inflammation-based prognostic score is a simple and reliable indicator of survival in the setting of salvage chemotherapy.

Background. Most gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination have been excluded from clinical studies because they usually have no measurable lesions. They also have a high risk of toxicity because of complications such as intestinal obstruction and ascites. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of sequential methotrexate (MTX) and 5-flurorouracil (5FU) therapy for this population. Methods. This analysis was based on 56 consecutive chemotherapy-naive patients with confirmed peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer who were being treated with sequential MTX/5FU. The therapy comprised a weekly schedule of MTX 100 mg/m2, given as a bolus infusion 3 h prior to a bolus infusion of 5FU 600 mg/m2. Leucovorin 10 mg/m2 was administered six times, every 6 h, starting 24 h after MTX administration. Results. Evidence of peritoneal dissemination was confirmed by laparotomy in 16 patients, by cytologic examination of ascites in 11 patients, and by clinical imaging in 29 patients (15 with ascites, 13 with intestinal obstruction; in 10 of the 29 patients, detection was by barium enema or computed tomography [CT] scan). Neutropenia of grade 3 or worse and anemia were observed in 8 (14%) and 10 (18%) of the 56 patients, respectively. There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis. Of the 26 patients with measurable lesions, 9 showed a response (36%). The median survival time and median time to treatment failure were 259 days and 167 days, respectively. Objective improvement of ascites was seen in 13 of 26 patients (50%), including 5 with showed complete disappearance of ascites. Seven of the 15 patients (47%) with intestinal obstruction showed resolution, and 8 of the 21 patients (38%) who needed nutritional support before the treatment were free of that support for a median duration of 220 days after the completion of the treatment. Forty-seven of the 56 patients (84%) could be treated at outpatient clinics. Conclusions. This regimen may be of clinical benefit for patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Two pathways have been proposed for the development of colorectal cancers: loss of heterozygosity and replication error. Colorectal cancers arising through the replication error pathway, like most hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancers, show microsatellite instability. It has been also reported that telomere shortening frequently occurs in colorectal cancers and that telomerase is often activated strongly in them. The aim of this study was to examine whether any relationships can be found among microsatellite instability, telomere length, and telomerase activity in colorectal cancers. METHODS: Genomic DNA was extracted from 55 invasive cancers and corresponding normal mucosas. Five microsatellite loci were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. Telomere length was examined by Southern blot analysis. Telomerase activity was assayed by telomeric repeat amplification protocol with minor modifications. RESULTS: Microsatellite instability was found in 8 (14.5 percent) of 55 tumors, and all of them showed short telomeres. Furthermore, four high-frequency microsatellite instability tumors that showed microsatellite instability at more than two loci exhibited remarkably short telomeres. The microsatellite instability correlated significantly with frequency of telomere shortening (P=0.0183; Fisher's exact probability test), but not with strength of telomerase activity. CONCLUSION: The relationship identified by this study between microsatellite instability and telomere shortening might suggest some association between the DNA mismatch repair system and the telomere maintenance mechanism in colorectal cancers.

We report a case of metastatic esophageal carcinoma successfully treated with chemoradiotherapy. A 61-year-old man, diagnosed as suffering from advanced esophageal carcinoma with liver and lymph node metastases, was treated with a combination of nedaplatin (90 mg/m2/day, 1 h drip infusion, day 1), 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day, continuous infusion, days 1-5), and radiotherapy (2 Gy/day, days 1-5, 8-12 and 15-19). The cycle was repeated twice every 5 weeks from July 2, 1997. He achieved a complete response 1 month after finishing two courses of chemoradiotherapy followed by an additional three courses of chemotherapy without radiation. Seven months after the completion of radiotherapy, pericardial effusion with negative cytology was recognized. The effusion was treated by pericardiocentesis and drainage for several days. After drainage, the effusion could be easily managed with diuretics. This patient is still alive with no evidence of disease more than 2.5 years after the initiation of the treatment.

BACKGROUND: Patients with bone metastasis of gastric cancer occasionally experience disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), with a very poor prognosis.METHODS: We treated 18 gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis with sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (sequential MTX/5-FU therapy). The treatment schedule comprised weekly administration of methotrexate (MTX; 100 mg/m(2), i.v. bolus) followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 600 mg/m(2), i.v. bolus) after an interval of 3 h. Calcium leucovorin (10 mg/m(2), p.o. or i.v.) was administered six times, every 6 h starting 24 h after the administration of MTX.RESULTS: In 11 patients with measurable metastatic lesions, the response rate was 64% (7/11). Nine patients (50%) had DIC before the initiation of chemotherapy, and 8 of them (89%) recovered from it. Two of these 9 patients (22%) survived for more than 1 year. The median survival times for all patients and for the 9 with DIC were 186 and 113 days, respectively. Grade 4 leukopenia was observed in 3 patients (17%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.CONCLUSION: Sequential MTX/5-FU therapy may have palliative potential and may be a feasible treatment for gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis with or without DIC.

We developed a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of S-1 including the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2A6 genotype and then used this PPK model to assess the influence of the CYP2A6 genotype on PK parameters of S-1 and the relationship between toxicity and the individual maximum concentrations (Cmax) or the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in Japanese patients with advanced cancer. Fifty-eight patients with advanced cancer were assessed. A dose of 80 mg/m(2)/day of S-1 was given orally. On the basis of the CYP2A6 genotypes (*1, *4, *7 and *9), all patients were classified as having the wild-type, 1 variant allele or 2 variant alleles. The PPK model was established with plasma concentration data for tegafur (FT), 5-chloro-2,4-performed dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) and 5-FU. In patients with 2 variant alleles of CYP2A6, the clearance of FT was 58% less than in patients with the wild-type or 1 variant allele. The AUC of 5-FU correlated with the AUC of CDHP, but not with the AUC of FT. Therefore, the CYP2A6 genotype did not affect the AUC of 5-FU. The individual AUC or Cmax of 5-FU did not differ significantly between patients with grade 3 or 4 toxicities and patients with grade 0-2 toxicities. In conclusion, the CYP2A6 genotype did not affect the AUC of 5-FU, although the clearance of FT was lower in patients with 2 variant alleles of CYP2A6 than in patients with the wild-type or 1 variant allele.

S-1 is an oral anticancer agent composed of tegafur (FT), 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), and potassium oxonate. CDHP is added to prevent degradation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by inhibiting dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. CYP2A6 is involved in the biotransformation of FT to 5-FU. Thus, we prospectively analyzed the effects of the CYP2A6 genotype, plasma level of CDHP, and patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of FT and 5-FU. Fifty-four Japanese patients with metastatic or recurrent cancers who received S-1 were enrolled. The CYP2A6 polymorphisms (*4A, *7, and *9) with deficient or reduced activity were analyzed. All subjects were classified into three groups according to their CYP2A6 genotype: wild type (*1/*1), one-variant allele (*1/any), or two-variant alleles (combination other than *1). The PK of FT, 5-FU, and CDHP were measured on day 1 of treatment. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that oral clearance of FT was associated with the CYP2A6 genotype (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P = 0.000838). The oral clearance of FT seen in patients with the two-variant alleles was significantly lower than those in wild type and the one-variant allele (95% confidence intervals 0.75-2.41 and 0.41-1.82, respectively; Tukey-Kramer test). The area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) of 5-FU was significantly correlated with the AUC of CDHP (ANOVA, P = 0.00126). The AUC of 5-FU and CDHP were inversely correlated with creatinine clearance (ANOVA, P = 0.0164 and P = 0.000762, respectively). Although the CYP2A6 variants are the cause of the PK variability of FT, the AUC of CDHP affected by renal function is the key determinant of the variability in the PK of 5-FU.

PurposeCetuximab, a chimeric immunoglobulin G 1 (IgG1) anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb), has shown efficacy in 10% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Recent studies demonstrate antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) is one of the modes of action for rituximab and trastuzumab. Fragment c (Fc) portion of IgG1 mAb has shown to induce ADCC. Fragment c gamma receptors (FcγR) play an important role in initiating ADCC. Studies have shown that two IgG FcγR polymorphisms (FCGR2A-H131R and FCGR3A-V158F) independently predict response to rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma. We tested the hypothesis of whether these two polymorphisms are associated with clinical outcome in metastatic CRC patients treated with single-agent cetuximab.Patients and MethodsThirty-nine metastatic CRC patients were enrolled onto the ImClone0144 trial. Using an allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) –based method, gene polymorphisms of FCGA2A-H131R and FCGA3A-V158F were assessed from genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood samples.ResultsFCGR2A-H131R and FCGR3A-V158F polymorphisms were independently associated with progression-free survival (PFS; P = .037 and .055, respectively; log-rank test). Combined analysis of these two polymorphisms showed that patients with the favorable genotypes (FCGR2A, any histidine allele, and FCGR3A, any phenylalanine allele) showed a median PFS of 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.4 to 4.4 months), whereas patients with any two unfavorable genotypes (FCGR2A arginine/arginine or valine/valine) had a PFS of 1.1 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.4 months; P = .004; log-rank test).ConclusionOur preliminary data suggest that these two polymorphisms may be useful molecular markers to predict clinical outcome in metastatic CRC patients treated with cetuximab and that they may indicate a role of ADCC of cetuximab.

e17544 Background: Seeking a second opinion has become relatively common among patients with life-threatening diseases in Japan. We investigated the backgrounds and situations of patients with inop...

2544 Background: TAS-114 is a first-in-class oral deoxyuridine triphosphatase inhibitor, which acts as a modulator of the pyrimidine nucleotide metabolic pathway. We are conducting a first combinat...

The phenotypic effects of UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 genetic polymorphisms on the in vivo pharmacokinetics of irinotecan were examined.Eighty-four Japanese patients with cancer who received irinotecan-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Polymorphisms present in UGT1A7 (T to G transversion at -57 and UGT1A7*2 to *9), UGT1A9 (9 or 10 repeat of T at -118 [-118(T)9 or 10] and UGT1A9*2 to *5), and UGT1A1 (UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*27, and UGT1A1*28) were analyzed for all patients. Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan were examined in 52 patients.The most frequent haplotype (haplotype I, 56.7%, 95% CI 53.1-60.4) consisted of polymorphisms related to normal catalytic or transcriptional activity [T at -57 and *1 of UGT1A7, -118(T)10 of UGT1A9, and UGT1A1*1]. The second most frequent haplotype (haplotype II, 15.0%, 95% CI 12.4-18.3) consisted of polymorphisms related to reduced catalytic or transcriptional activity [-57TG and *3 of UGT1A7 and -118(T)9 of UGT1A9 linked to UGT1A1*6]. The AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G) ratios in three patients homozygous for haplotype II were significantly higher than those in 20 patients with I/I diplotype (P = 0.011). Neither of these patients had UGT1A1*28.Genetic linkage of UGT1A7 and UGT1A9 polymorphisms to UGT1A1*6, related to reduced catalytic and transcriptional activities of UGTs, is associated with the decreased glucuronosyltransferase activity for SN-38 in Japanese patients with cancer.

Oxaliplatin, a platinum compound, has been commonly used around the world for treating advanced colorectal cancer. The generally recommended dose and schedule of oxaliplatin monotherapy is 130 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. This trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin monotherapy in Japanese patients with solid tumors.Oxaliplatin was administered as a 2-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks at a dose of 90 and 130 mg/m(2). Blood was collected to determine the total platinum and the ultrafiltrate platinum concentrations in plasma in all cycles.Nine patients were enrolled; three were given oxaliplatin monotherapy at 90 mg/m(2) and six received 130 mg/m(2). All tumors were colorectal cancer. The major adverse reactions included myelosuppressive, neurological and gastrointestinal toxicities, although most were grades 1 and 2 at both dose levels. Peripheral sensory neuropathy of without movement disturbance (grade 1 or 2) was observed in all patients at both dose levels. The 130 mg/m(2) dose level was not found to be the maximum tolerated dose, but was judged to be the recommended dose. No objective responses were seen and five cases of no change were observed. A bi-exponential open model best described the disappearance of platinum in the plasma, and a tri-exponential open model best described the disappearance of ultrafilterable platinum in the plasma at both dose levels. No racial difference was suggested in the pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin.The oxaliplatin monotherapy dose schedule of 130 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, recommended worldwide, is acceptable for Japanese patients.

Purpose To compare the efficacy, toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of an oral regimen consisting of uracil/tegafur (UFT) and leucovorin (LV) between Japanese patients and patients in the United States with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Forty-four Japanese patients and 45 patients in the United States were enrolled in concurrent nonrandomized phase II trials. UFT 300 mg/m2/d and leucovorin 75 mg/d were administered orally for 28 days followed by a 7-day rest period. The total daily dose of each drug was divided into three equal doses. Treatment was repeated every 5 weeks until disease progression. Blood samples for the pharmacokinetic study were obtained after the initial dose on day 1 of the first course. Results The response rate for the Japanese patients and the patients in the United States was 36.4% (95% CI, 22.4% to 52.2%) and 34.1% (95% CI, 20.5% to 49.9%), respectively. The only major toxicity was diarrhea, and other toxicities were mild in both populations. The incidence of grade 3 or higher diarrhea in the Japanese and Americans was 9% and 22%, respectively. Although the area under the curve and maximum concentration of fluorouracil were found to be slightly higher in the Japanese patients than the patients in the United States, and area under the curve–adjusted body surface area appeared to be comparable between the two groups. Conclusion The efficacy and pharmacokinetic parameters of UFT and LV are comparable in Japanese and American patients; however, a difference in toxicity profile, specifically diarrhea, was noted. This oral regimen of UFT and LV is considered to have similar activity against metastatic colorectal cancer and to have acceptable toxicity in patients in both countries.

It is likely that there are some discrepancies in the safety and efficacy results for anticancer agents between those shown in registration studies for approval and those shown in clinical practice after market release. The aim of this survey was to confirm the safety and efficacy of S-1 for advanced gastric cancer after market release.After the approval of S-1 in 1999, all patients had to be registered with the manufacturer for a post-marketing survey, according to the government recommendation. All patients were monitored for safety and survival. The data for all registered patients were updated 1 year after each registration.During this survey, a total of 4177 patients with advanced gastric cancer were registered. The incidences of all adverse events and of grade 3 or worse adverse events in the 3808 patients evaluable for safety were 74.3% and 25.0%, respectively. In patients with lower creatinine clearance at baseline, the incidences of adverse reactions were higher for all grades combined, as well as for grades 3 or worse. There were 90 (2.4%) early deaths (within 30 days of the initiation of the treatment) and 5 (0.1%) deaths possibly related to the treatment. The median survival time and the 1-year survival rate for all patients evaluable for efficacy (n = 3801) were 8.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-8.6 months) and 33.3% (95% CI, 31.8-34.9%), respectively.This nationwide survey confirmed that the safety and efficacy profiles of S-1 were similar to those seen in the registration study. These results have proven the utility of this post-marketing survey in assessing the reproducibility of the safety and efficacy results obtained from prior clinical studies.

Purpose To compare the treatment results between radical surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy for resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and to identify useful clinicopathologic and biologic markers to select better treatment. Methods and materials Between August 1992 and April 1999, 98 consecutive patients were selected for this study; 53 were treated with chemoradiotherapy and 45 with surgery. The patients in the chemoradiotherapy group received 5-fluorouracil combined with cisplatin plus 60 Gy of radiation, and those in the surgery group received an esophagectomy with radical node dissection. Biologic markers were investigated immunohistochemically using pretreatment biopsy specimens. Results The baseline clinical TNM stage was more advanced in the chemoradiotherapy group than in the surgery group. With a median follow-up period of 43 months, the 5-year survival rate was 46% in the chemoradiotherapy and 51% in the surgery group, without statistical significance (p = 0.47, log–rank test). Cox regression analysis for prognosis revealed that epidermal growth factor receptor positivity, high microvessel density, and cyclin D1 positivity yielded a low value for relative risk (0.66, 0.54, and 0.62, respectively), which favored chemoradiotherapy over surgery, without statistical significance. Conclusion This nonrandomized study showed a trend for the chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma, but the results need to be confirmed by additional study.

S-1(TS-1), a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, has been commercially available for gastric cancer in Japan. A nationwide post-marketing survey for safety was carried out after its approval. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of this agent in clinical practice for patients with advanced gastric cancer registered in the postmarketing survey from our institution.Between April 1999 and April 2000, a total of 51 chemo-naive patients were registered in the survey from the National Cancer Center Hospital East. S-1 was administered at 80 mg/m2/day for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest, repeated every 6 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or the patient's refusal.Of the 51 patients, 41 (80%) fulfilled the criteria of the guidelines determined by the company as appropriate patients for the drug administration. The median number of treatment courses was five. Toxicities were generally mild: grade 3 or 4 toxicities were seen in 10% or fewer patients, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. In the 47 patients with evaluable lesions, there were 2 complete responses and 18 partial responses, with a response rate of 43%. With a minimum follow-up of 2 years, median survival time and 2-year survival were 11.1 months and 33%, respectively. The majority of the 17 2-year survivors had diffuse-type histology and peritoneal metastasis and achieved an objective response.S-1 appears to be safe and highly active, with favorable longterm survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, particularly in those with diffuse-type histology and peritoneal metastasis.

4005 Background: RAINBOW, a global phase III trial, demonstrated significant improvements in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) in patients (p...